BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Editorial
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Sep 5, 2026; 17(3): 120768
Published online Sep 5, 2026. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.120768
Table 1 Comparison of temporary abdominal closure techniques
Technique
Cost
Bedside feasible
Time to SSD ≤ 5 cm
Fascial closure rate
Key limitations
Standard Bogota bag[10]Low (1-2 dollars)Yes13 days35%-45%No traction; domain loss
Serial bag tighteningNegligible (approximately 0.50 dollar)Yes9.94 daysSSD ≤ 5 cm (definitive pending)Surrogate endpoint
Towel clips[11]NegligibleYes14-21 days20%-30%Skin necrosis. Poor traction
Wittmann patch alternatives[12]Moderate (10-20 dollars)Partial10-15 days50%-60%Reusability issues, infection
Mosquito net mesh tractionVery low (approximately 1 dollar)Partial11-14 days60%-70%OR-dependent, availability
ABTheraTM NPWTHigh (300+ dollars/dressing)No10-14 days70%-80%Cost, OR-dependent
Fasciotens®[6,13]High (approximately three hundred thousand rupees)Partial7-9 days70%-80%Availability
NPWT + mesh (VAWCM)[9,14-17]HighNo10-14 days70%-80%ECF risk; OR-dependent
Perforated drains[18]LowYes9.1 daysNot reportedSmall series
Table 2 Temporary abdominal closure strategies by resource tier
Setting
TAC strategy
Closure rate
Cost
Availability
High-incomeABTheraTM/VAWCM[9,14-17]70%-80%HighHigh
Middle-incomeFasciotens®/mesh[6,13]65%-75%ModerateLow
Low-incomeSerial Bogota[1]SSD ≤ 5 cm: 100%NegligibleUniversal
Table 3 Risk profile comparison
Risk
Serial Bogota
Towel clips[11]
NPWT[9]
Skin ischemiaNone reported15%-25%5%-10%
Suture cut-throughNone (polypropylene)N/AN/A
Patient discomfortMinimal (analgesia)SevereModerate
Enterocutaneous fistulaComparableHigherLower
Table 4 Study outcomes - serial tightening vs control, mean ± SD
Outcome
Serial tightening (n = 18)
Control (n = 18)
P value
Time to SSD ≤ 5 cm (days)9.94 ± 1.8813.0 ± 2.870.0003
Hospital stay (days)17.0 ± 1.8520.39 ± 3.170.0013
ComplicationsComparableComparableNS
MortalityComparableComparableNS


Write to the Help Desk