Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Sep 5, 2026; 17(3): 120122
Published online Sep 5, 2026. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.120122
Published online Sep 5, 2026. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.120122
Table 1 Comparative efficacy of nor-ursodeoxycholic acid and ursodeoxycholic acid in patients with different hepatobiliary diseases
| Properties | UDCA | Nor-UDCA |
| Chemical name[1] | 3-α,7 β-dihydroxy-5 β-cholan-24-oic acid | 3-α,7 β-dihydroxy-24-nor-5 β-cholan-23-oic acid |
| Molecular formula[1] | C24H40O4 | C23H3804 (one methylene group less) |
| Synthesis[1,13] | Secondary bile acid formed by intestinal bacteria from primary bile acids and available synthetically | Synthetic sidechain shortened derivative of UDCA |
| Hydrophilicity[1,13,14] | Less | More hydrophilic than UDCA |
| Cytotoxicity[1,16] | Low cytotoxicity in healthy states; but may be toxic in obstructive cholestasis (e.g., bile duct ligated models) | Less cytotoxic; ameliorates injury even in obstructive conditions where UDCA is toxic |
| Dosage[2,9,44] | Typically, 13-15 mg/kg/day (e.g., for PBC or PSC) | 1500 mg/day (approximately equimolar to high dose UDCA) |
| FXR agonism[1,14] | Negligible effects on FXR activation | No effects on FXR. Most Effects are independent of FXR or TGR5 receptors |
| Effects on TGF-β[19] | Reduces TGF levels (moderate anti-fibrotic effect) | Significantly reduces TGF-β expression more effectively than UDCA in fibrosis models |
| Chole-hepatic shunt[1,20] | No. It is conjugated with taurine/glycine and remains in the bile until it reaches the intestine | Yes. Resists conjugation, allowing it to be reabsorbed by bile ducts and return to the liver creating a shunt |
| Bicarbonate secretion[1,15,20] | Moderate increase in bicarbonate secretion | Significant increase (hypercholeresis); the “bicarbonate umbrella” hypothesis suggests efficient choleresis protects hepatocytes and cholangiocytes |
| Anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic activity on hepatocyte[18,19] | Moderate; established in PBC but less effective in other fibrosis models | Superior and more potent. Significantly reduces hydroxyproline and collagen in models like Mdr2-/- and TAA-induced fibrosis |
| Effects on bile duct ligated mice[16] | Detrimental as it increases biliary pressure and may lead to bile infarcts or necrosis | Protective. It reduces liver injury and markers of cholestasis compared to UDCA |
| Current indications[1] | FDA approved: PBC, gallstone dissolution and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy | Investigational: MASLD and PSC. Approved in India for MASLD by Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation |
| Adverse events[2,9] | Generally well tolerated; diarrhea, weight gain, hair thinning | Similar safety profile in trials; mild gastrointestinal symptoms reported |
| Pregnancy safety[43,44] | Safe (category B); widely used for ICP | Unknown |
| Contraindications[1,44] | Complete biliary obstruction, acute cholecystitis, calcified gallstones | Hypersensitivity (theoretical: Complete obstruction, though animal models suggest it is safer than UDCA) |
Table 2 Nor-ursodeoxycholic acid in pre-clinical animal studies and randomised controlled trials on patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and primary sclerosing cholangitis
| Ref. | Study subjects | Patient phenotype | Treatment | Outcome |
| Buko et al[19] | Thioacetamide-induced liver fibrosis in rat model | Experimental in animal model of liver fibrosis | Fibrotic rats were administered UDCA (80 mg/kg) and nor-UDCA (equimolar 80 mg/kg) | Nor-UDCA decreased liver hydroxyproline content and TGF-β expression. Liver fibrosis regression was more pronounced in UDCA-treated rats |
| Fickert et al[16] | Bile duct ligated mice | Experimental animal model of cholestasis | 0.5% UDCA vs nor-UDCA in Abcb (-/-) mice with bile duct ligated mice | UDCA is toxic to bile duct ligated mice however, nor-UDCA ameliorated liver injury |
| Marchianò et al[23] | Western diet-fed rat model with hepatic steatosis | Experimental animal study in liver steatosis | UDCA vs nor-UDCA in rat model with steatosis | UDCA and nor-UDCA both protected against steatosis and fibrosis but failed to ameliorate hepatic ballooning and nor-UDCA use was associated development of dyslipidemia |
| Sombetzki et al[22] | Murine model of schistosomiasis | Experimental animal study with liver fibrosis | UDCA vs nor-UDCA in schistosoma mansoni infected liver | Nor-UDCA affected surface expression of MHC in macrophage and exerts anti-fibrotic property |
| Traussnigg et al[2] | NAFLD | A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase II dose-finding trial | 198 patients randomised to 1:1:1 to receive 500 mg/day nor-UDCA vs 1500 mg/day nor-UDCA vs placebo in patients with NAFLD | A dose-dependent reduction in ALT between baseline and end of treatment was observed with nor-UDCA vs placebo, with a significant effect in the 1500 mg group (mean change -27.8%, 95%CI: -34.7 to -14.4; P < 0.0001). Ninety nine and 112 side effects were reported in 63 subjects and 64 subjects, respectively |
| Panuganti et al[9] | MASLD | Phase III double blind randomised controlled trial | 110 received nor-UDCA (1500 mg/day) and 55 received placebo | At 12 weeks: ALT normalization in nor-UDCA group: 89% vs 76% in placebo group (P = 0.022). Fibrosis improvement: 57% in nor-UDCA group vs 40% in placebo (P = 0.035). Major limitations of this study include the absence of established parameters of liver fibrosis and steatosis as a trial endpoint, i.e., paired liver biopsy, and MR-PDFF. The effects on metabolic parameters were not elaborated in the study and they included a small number of patients. Impact of de-novo hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia during the study deserved a special mention and discussion in the trial |
| Fickert et al[10] | PSC | Randomised control trial | 161 patients PSC with or without UDCA randomized for 12 weeks of nor-UDCA with 4 weeks follow-up | Nor-UDCA group showed significant reduction in ALP levels as compared to the placebo: -12.3%, -17.3%, and -26.0% in the 500, 1000, and 1500 mg/day groups (P = 0.029, P = 0.003, and P < 0.0001 respectively) |
- Citation: Malakar S, Sood N, Giri S, Samanta A. Nor-ursodeoxycholic acid in hepatobiliary diseases: A narrative review. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2026; 17(3): 120122
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5349/full/v17/i3/120122.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.120122