Real-world studies on vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are often limited by small sample size and short follow-up. In this study, we investigated the 2-year effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in patients with IBD, and applied eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to identify predictors of both.

The Long-term Italian Vedolizumab Effectiveness (LIVE) study is multicentric, ambispective, observational study enrolling 1111 IBD patients (563 Crohn's disease, CD, 542 ulcerative colitis, UC). Steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR) at 24 months was the primary endpoint. A XAI model (eXtreme Gradient Boosting, XGB) was applied to identify the main clinical predictors of SFCR and development of adverse events (AEs).

Rates of SFCR at 24 months were 31.6 % and 39.7 % in CD and UC patients, and 0.14 AEs per patient-year was recorded. On XGB analysis, previous exposure to anti-TNFα and older age were the most important drivers for the prediction of SFCR; lower baseline CRP levels and fewer comorbidities were the most important features associated with no development of AEs.

Vedolizumab is effective and safe in IBD patients. XAI yielded promising results in identifying the most important predictors of SFCR and development of AEs.

In the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 GRAPHITE study (NCT03657160), anti-α4β7 integrin antibody vedolizumab showed greater efficacy than placebo for prevention of lower-gastrointestinal (GI) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after unrelated allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). This post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab versus placebo for lower-GI aGVHD prevention in Japanese and non-Japanese patients, when added to standard GVHD prophylaxis (calcineurin inhibitor + methotrexate/mycophenolate mofetil + / - anti-thymocyte globulin [ATG]). The analysis included 35 (18 vedolizumab-treated, 17 placebo-treated) Japanese and 298 (150 vedolizumab-treated, 148 placebo-treated) non-Japanese patients. Lower-GI aGVHD-free survival by day + 180 after allo-HSCT (primary endpoint) was 94% in vedolizumab-treated versus 81% in placebo-treated Japanese patients (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.03-4.01; P = 0.2) and 84% in vedolizumab-treated versus 70% in placebo-treated non-Japanese patients (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.28-0.78; P = 0.002). The number of events for the 5 key secondary endpoints (lower-GI aGVHD-free and relapse-free survival, Grade C-D aGVHD-free survival, non-relapse mortality, overall survival, and Grade B-D aGVHD-free survival) by day + 180 was lower in vedolizumab- versus placebo-treated Japanese patients. No safety concerns were identified for vedolizumab use as lower-GI aGVHD prophylaxis in Japanese patients.

B cells display several immunoregulatory mechanisms including the production of interleukin-10. Ectonucleotidases like CD39 and CD73 influence immune homeostasis by metabolizing eATP and generating immunosuppressive adenosine. The major objective was to examine the expression of those immunoregulatory molecules on B-cell subsets, and, more specifically, to determine their association with an infliximab (IFX) treatment in a pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) cohort. 42 IBD patients were assessed for IFX response after 12 mo of therapy and compared against 14 healthy controls (HC). Although IL10-producing plasmablasts were decreased in IFX nonresponders (NRS), we detected an up-regulation of CD39 on plasmablasts and increased fractions of CD39/CD73-co-expressing naïve and memory B cells in responding patients (RS). In addition, B cells of responders proved to have superior ATP degradation capacities and adenosine production before therapy initiation compared with NRS and HC. Moreover, IFX nonresponders had a marked deficiency of α4β7hi plasmablasts, whereas both cohorts had fewer CCR9-expressing plasmablasts. Consequently, CD39+ plasmablasts were decreased in biopsies of inflamed mucosal tissues, especially in IFX nonresponders. Our results highlight the regulatory potential of CD39/CD73-expressing B cells in pediatric IBD and suggest CD39+ plasmablasts as a potential determinant of a successful immunosuppressive therapy with IFX.

Clinical practice is currently guided by studies that average over patient outcomes. This may not be the best approach, as different patients may have different treatment responses. Here we extend a method for simulating clinical trials to identify optimal treatments for each patient, and we illustrate this approach in the context of Crohn's disease. Using the data from 15 randomized trials (N = 5703), we used statistical hypothesis testing to identify seven subgroups with distinct responses to three different drug classes. The largest subgroup consisted of patients with equivocal responses to all drug classes, whereas the second largest showed superiority with anti-TNFs. We also identified a subgroup of women over 50 with superior responses to anti-IL-12/23s. Interestingly, this group appeared under-represented in the trials (2%) compared to patients at the University of California (25%). Overall, these results underscore the importance of studying personalized medicine, demonstrate the value of clinical trial data, and provide a roadmap for applying this method broadly across diseases. These results also highlight the importance of diverse and representative recruitment into clinical trials.

Vedolizumab is approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD). Real-world evidence is essential for understanding the effectiveness and benefit-risk profile of vedolizumab outside clinical trial settings.

To identify, systematically review and assess the real-world effectiveness and treatment persistence of vedolizumab in patients with CD, particularly over long-term follow-up periods and among populations with differing treatment experience, and to compare with the treatment persistence of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α treatment.

Literature searches were conducted to identify studies published from 2014 to 2022. Relevant congress searches were conducted (2015-2022) using Embase or by hand. Data on adults with CD treated with vedolizumab or anti-TNFα treatment in a real-world setting were extracted for meta-analysis.

Data from 73 studies, including 29,894 patients with CD, reported ≥ 1 outcome of interest for this analysis. Vedolizumab treatment persistence rate was 65.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 60.2-70.1) at 1 year and 54.8% (95% CI 43.9-65.3) at 2 years. The treatment persistence rate with vedolizumab versus anti-TNFα treatment was 84.6% (95% CI 70.2-92.8) versus 75.3% (95% CI 69.7-80.2) at 1 year and 70.6% (95% CI 60.7-78.8) versus 64.6% (95% CI 56.7-71.8) at 2 years. The mucosal healing rate at 1 year was 40.6% (95% CI 34.2-47.3). Clinical remission rates were 39.4% (95% CI 33.9-45.1) at 1 year and 34.3% (95% CI 18.1-55.2) at 2 years. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates were 33.2% (95% CI 28.5-38.3) at 1 year and 20.4% (95% CI 12.5-31.5) at 2 years. All clinical outcome rates were higher in biologic-naive than in biologic-experienced patients.

Real-world use of vedolizumab was associated with favourable long-term effectiveness and treatment persistence. Vedolizumab is a suitable first-line biological option for biologic-naive patients with CD.

Vedolizumab is a gut-selective monoclonal anti-α4β7 integrin antibody treatment for Crohn's disease (CD). A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (NCT03234907) assessed vedolizumab efficacy and safety in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe CD and inadequate/loss of response/intolerance to previous conventional or anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy.

Eligible patients aged ≥18 to ≤80 years with moderate-to-severe CD (CD Activity Index [CDAI] total score 220-400) were randomized 2:1 to vedolizumab 300 mg intravenous infusion or placebo at Weeks 0, 2, 6 of induction, and every 4/8 weeks during Week 14-58 maintenance treatment. Primary and secondary endpoints at Week 10 were enhanced clinical response (≥100-point decrease from baseline CDAI score), and clinical remission (CDAI score ≤150), respectively. Additional Week 10 and/or Week 60 assessments included endoscopic and biomarker (C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin) measurements.

The study was conducted at 30 centers (August 2017 through August 2020). Enrolled patients (n = 215) were randomized to vedolizumab (n = 144) or placebo (n = 71). By Week 10, 19.4 % vedolizumab-treated versus 24.3 % placebo-treated patients achieved an enhanced clinical response. The Cui-Hung-Wang-adjusted p-value for the primary endpoint was 0.347. After maintenance treatment at Week 60, rates of enhanced clinical response, clinical remission, endoscopic response, mucosal healing, and biomarker improvements appeared greater for vedolizumab-treated than placebo-treated patients.

There were no new safety findings for vedolizumab treatment of Chinese patients with CD. Although the primary endpoint was not met, vedolizumab-treated patients showed improvements in other disease activity measures at Weeks 10 and 60.

Mucosal healing (MH) is a key therapeutic target in Crohn's disease (CD) and is associated with improved outcomes. While adult studies indicate a positive correlation between serum anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) levels and MH, data in pediatric patients is limited. We aimed to define the association of serum anti-TNF levels with MH in pediatric patients with CD during maintenance therapy.

Retrospective data (2014-2023) was collected from pediatric CD patients treated with infliximab or adalimumab who performed an ileocolonoscopy at least 26 weeks after initiating therapy. Serum anti-TNF levels around endoscopic time were compared with endoscopic findings. MH was defined as complete absence of inflammatory or ulcerative lesions across all segments of the gastrointestinal tract. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with MH.

Data were obtained from 107 patients (41 infliximab and 66 adalimumab), with a median age at diagnosis of 12.6 (9.9-14.0) years. Median time until ileocolonoscopy following anti-TNF initiation was 89.0 (56.3-152.3) weeks. MH was identified in 31 (29.0%) patients. Anti-TNF serum levels were comparable in the MH and non-MH groups (9.5 [4.9-13.9] vs. 9.3 [6.4-15.7] µg/mL; p = 0.73), without differences in patients treated with infliximab or adalimumab. In multivariable analysis, diagnosis weight Z-score (odds ratio [OR] = 2.860, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.005-8.138; p = 0.049), along with C-reactive protein (OR = 0.037, 95% CI = 0.002-0.687; p = 0.027) and fecal calprotectin (OR = 0.995, 95% CI = 0.990-1.000; p = 0.037) at time of ileocolonoscopy were significantly associated with MH.

In our cohort, anti-TNF levels during maintenance were not associated with MH in pediatric CD.

Infliximab and adalimumab are the only biologics thus far approved for paediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), so other biologics, such as vedolizumab, are prescribed off-label. Despite its frequent use, prospective data for vedolizumab treatment in children are available only for short-term induction outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with vedolizumab in paediatric patients with IBD.

In this multicentre, prospective, cohort study (VEDOKIDS), children younger than 18 years with Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or IBD unclassified (analysed with the ulcerative colitis group) who had initiated intravenous vedolizumab were enrolled from 17 centres in six countries (Israel, the USA, Italy, Ireland, Denmark, and Slovenia). Patients initiating vedolizumab to prevent postoperative recurrence were excluded. Vedolizumab dose or schedule were not standardised, and concomitant treatment with any other medication was permitted. Patients were prospectively followed up for 54 weeks, with repeated biosampling. The primary outcome was complete remission at week 54, defined as clinical remission (weighted Paediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index [wPCDAI] of <12·5 points in Crohn's disease and Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index [PUCAI] of <10 in ulcerative colitis) without the need for surgery, exclusive enteral nutrition for children with Crohn's disease, or steroids (steroid-free and exclusive enteral nutrition-free clinical remission) plus CRP concentration lower than 1·5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) of 0·5 mg/dL. In cases of missing data on CRP, ESR was used instead (concentrations <1·5 times the ULN, which was 25 mm/h). Data were analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02862132.

Between May 19, 2016, and April 1, 2022, we enrolled 142 patients. Five children who had received only one or two infusions of their three-infusion induction before switching drugs due to COVID-19 pandemic-related reasons were excluded, leaving 137 children (64 [47%] with Crohn's disease, 64 [47%] with ulcerative colitis, and nine [7%] with IBD unclassified; 63 [46%] male and 74 [54%] female; age range of 0·7-17·6 years) in the intention-to-treat population. The median wPCDAI score in children with Crohn's disease decreased from 35 (IQR 18 to 49) at baseline to 13 (0 to 25; median of differences -14 [95% CI -33 to 0]) at week 54, and the median PUCAI score in children with ulcerative colitis decreased from 25 (IQR 15 to 50) at baseline to 5 (0 to 25) at week 54 (median of difference -10 [-30 to 0]). Improvements in disease activity were significant by week 6, with no further significant changes between visits. At week 54, 16 (25%) of 64 children with Crohn's disease and 34 (47%) of 73 with ulcerative colitis or IBD unclassified were in complete remission. 38 vedolizumab-related adverse events were recorded in 29 (21%) of 137 children, the most common being headache (n=7), myalgia (n=4), and fever (n=4), and none were serious.

Vedolizumab maintenance seems safe and efficacious in children, with a higher efficacy in those with ulcerative colitis than in those with Crohn's disease.

The European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation, the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, and Takeda.

Understanding placebo rates is critical for efficient clinical trial design. We assessed placebo rates and associated factors using individual patient data from Crohn's disease trials.

We conducted a meta-analysis of phase 2/3 placebo-controlled trials evaluating advanced therapies in moderate to severe Crohn's disease (2010-2021). Deidentified individual patient data were obtained through Vivli Inc and the Yale University Open Data Access Project. Primary outcomes were clinical response and remission. Pooled placebo rates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using 1- and 2-stage meta-analytic approaches. Regression analyses identified patient-level factors associated with placebo rates.

Analysis of individual patient data from 8 induction (n = 1147) and 4 maintenance (n = 524) trials showed overall placebo clinical response and remission rates for induction were 27% (95% CI, 23%-32%) and 10% (95% CI, 8%-14%), respectively, and 32% (95% CI, 23%-42%) and 22% (95% CI, 14%-33%) for maintenance, respectively. Among biologic (bio)-naïve patients, placebo response and remission rates during induction were 29% (95% CI, 24%-35%) and 11% (95% CI, 8%-15%) respectively, and 26% (95% CI, 20%-33%) and 10% (95% CI, 8%-14%) for biologic (bio)-exposed patients, respectively. During maintenance, biologic-naïve response and remission rates were 41% (95% CI, 34%-48%) and 32% (95% CI, 24%-40%), respectively, and 29% (95% CI, 24%-34%) and 16% (95% CI, 13%-21%) for bio-exposed, respectively. Higher baseline C-reactive protein concentration predicted lower placebo rates, whereas higher baseline albumin levels and body mass index increased the odds of placebo outcomes. Increased baseline Crohn's Disease Activity Index and 2-item patient-reported outcome scores predicted higher response rates in induction, lower response rates in maintenance, and lower remission rates in induction and maintenance.

Patient- and trial-level characteristics influence placebo rates in Crohn's disease trials. Careful implementation of eligibility criteria, outcome definitions, and patient stratification may reduce placebo rates.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, is a group of chronic, immune-mediated disorders of the gastrointestinal tract that present substantial clinical challenges owing to their complex pathophysiology and tendency to relapse. A treat-to-target approach is recommended, involving iterative treatment adjustments to achieve clinical response, reduce inflammatory markers and achieve long-term goals such as mucosal healing. Lifelong medication is often necessary to manage the disease, maintain remission and prevent complications. The therapeutic landscape for IBD has evolved substantially; however, a ceiling on therapeutic efficacy remains and surgery is sometimes required (owing to uncontrolled disease activity or complications). Effective IBD management involves comprehensive care, including medication adherence and a collaborative clinician-patient relationship. This Review discusses current therapeutic options for IBD, detailing mechanisms of action, efficacy, safety profiles and guidelines for use of each drug class. We also explore emerging therapies and the role of surgery. Additionally, the importance of a multidisciplinary team and personalized care in managing IBD is emphasized, advocating for patient empowerment and involvement in treatment decisions. By synthesizing current knowledge and emerging trends, this Review aims to equip healthcare professionals with a thorough understanding of therapeutic options for IBD, enhancing informed, evidence-based decisions in clinical practice.

In contrast to previous network meta-analysis using classical frequentist methods, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of six frequently-used biologics through a Bayesian method.

Web of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease, comparing Infliximab, Adalimumab, Certolizumab pegol, Ustekinumab, Risankizumab, or Vedolizumab, relative to placebo or an active comparator for induction of clinical response (two different definitions) and maintenance of clinical remission. A random-effects model was performed with rankings according to the surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability. Finally, we completed sensitivity and consistency analyses, and evaluated the certainty of evidence through GRADE working group guidance.

We identified 22 and 20 RCTs for induction and maintenance therapy, respectively. Infliximab combined with azathioprine was most effective for inducing clinical response in TNF (tumor necrosis factor) antagonist-naïve patients. For TNF antagonist-experienced patients, Ustekinumab (SUCRA 86.19) and Risankizumab (SUCRA 62.56) have the largest SUCRA in induction of clinical response. Risankizumab has the lowest risk of adverse events (SUCRA 84.81), serious adverse events (SUCRA 94.23), and serious infections (SUCRA 79.73) in induction therapy. Adalimumab and the 10 mg/kg regimen of Infliximab rank highest for maintaining clinical remission.

This analysis suggests that Infliximab in combination with azathioprine may be preferred biologic agents for induction therapy in TNF antagonist-naïve patients. For TNF antagonist-experienced patients, Ustekinumab and Risankizumab may be preferred biologic agents for induction therapy. Risankizumab potentially has the lowest safety risk worth exploring in induction therapy. Adalimumab and the 10 mg/kg regimen of Infliximab have maintenance efficacy benefits for responders to induction therapy.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=458609, Identifier CRD42023458609.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), primarily encompassing ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, represent a challenging spectrum of disorders with a multifaceted pathogenesis. Despite the array of available treatments, a demand for novel therapeutic options persists to achieve remission in a broader patient population. Research findings indicate that relying solely on a single biologic drug may limit future treatment choices, prompting consideration for a more suitable shift from step-up to top-down strategies in certain cases. In the backdrop of advancing drug development, reimagining the application of existing therapies presents a promising avenue. Among these innovative approaches is combination therapy. This review explores the outcomes of recent randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, and case studies, focusing on dual biologic therapy. It underscores the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of combining two biologic drugs in IBD, providing insights into a potentially impactful treatment strategy.

A vicious cycle of dysregulated intestinal epithelial cell death, intestinal barrier defect, and subsequent inflammation response is core to chronic ulcerative colitis (UC). Modified Jiaoqi Powder (MJQP), a traditional Chinese medicine formula, has been clinically applied to treat chronic relapsing and chronic persistent types of UC. Nevertheless, the underlying mechanisms of MJQP in chronic UC remains unknown.

The present study aimed to demonstrate the favorable effects and potential molecular mechanisms of MJQP in chronic UC.

The chemical components of MJQP and MJQP drug serum were identified by LC-MS/MS. The curative effects of MJQP were evaluated in a well-established DSS-induced chronic UC mice model by measuring body weight, colon length, disease activity index (DAI) and histological scores. Serum cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-12, IL-13, IL-4, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and IFN-γ were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Western blotting, immunofluorescence, and MTT assay were used to analyze the effects of MJQP on colonic barrier function in chronic UC mice and human epithelial cell lines. TUNEL assay, western blotting, and flow cytometry were used to examine the related apoptosis indicators. An electron microscope was used to observe autophagosomes and autolysosomes, while western blotting and immunofluorescence were used to detect autophagy-associated proteins. Network pharmacology was used to predict potential targets and pathways of MJQP in UC. Finally, the TNF pathway-related proteins were detected by immunohistochemistry and western blotting.

MJQP administration prevented the UC progression, as evidenced by faster weight gain, longer colon length, lower histological scores and DAI, and up-/down- regulation of inflammatory factors. The expression of tight junction proteins, ki67, and E-cadherin increased dose-dependently after MJQP intervention. Moreover, MJQP treatment promoted the viability of NCM460 and Caco2 cells in a concentration-dependent manner. MJQP dose-dependently decreased the proportion of TUNEL-positive cells and attenuated the pro-apoptotic proteins cleaved-caspase 8 and cleaved-caspase 3 in colonic tissues. Flow cytometry also showed that MJQP dose-dependently decreased the apoptotic cell population of LPS-induced NCM460 and Caco2 cells. Electron microscopy revealed that autophagosomes and autolysosomes were significantly improved in the MJQP-treated groups. Additionally, autophagy-related proteins were significantly expressed after MJQP treatment. Network pharmacological analysis predicted that MJQP may alleviate chronic UC by promoting intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and affecting TNF-related signaling pathways. As anticipated, the TNF pathway-associated proteins were attenuated dose-dependently in colonic tissues after MJQP treatment.

These results provide novel therapeutic strategies indicating that MJQP may be a promising candidate treatment for chronic UC by promoting epithelial barrier restitution by enhancing epithelial autophagy against TNF-mediated apoptosis.

Curcumin, a compound from Curcuma longa L., has significant anti-inflammatory properties. However, the mechanisms underlying its anti-inflammatory activity in dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced ulcerative colitis (UC) remain inadequately understood. This study aimed to further elucidate the molecular mechanisms of curcumin DSS-induced UC mice. Our data showed that curcumin alleviated DSS-induced colitis by reducing intestinal damage and inflammation, increasing goblet cells in colon tissues. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay revealed that curcumin reduced the expression of inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1β, and interleukin-8) in serum and myeloperoxidase in colon tissues. A comprehensive analysis integrating network pharmacology and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) revealed significant enrichment of the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathways. Notably, RNA-seq analysis demonstrated that curcumin significantly downregulated the mRNA expression of sphingosine kinase 1 (SphK1). Furthermore, molecular docking analysis showed that curcumin can bind to SphK1 and NF-κB. Additionally, curcumin was found to inhibit the activation of the SphK1/NF-κB signaling pathway in DSS-induced UC colon tissue. This study addresses pharmacologic and mechanistic perspectives of curcumin that ameliorates DSS-induced UC and inflammatory response.

Vedolizumab and ustekinumab are effective in inducing and maintaining corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFR) in adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study describes the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab in pediatric IBD.

All patients ≤18 years of age with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with vedolizumab or ustekinumab in three centers in Northern France were followed retrospectively. The primary outcome was CFR at Week 14 (W14).

Twenty-five patients (9 CD, 16 UC) and 33 patients (28 CD, 5 UC) were started on vedolizumab and ustekinumab respectively between 2016 and 2021. All were previously treated with antitumor necrosis factor (TNF). The median time from diagnosis to treatment initiation was 21.0 (12.0-44.0) and 42.0 (22.0-73.5) months for vedolizumab and ustekinumab, respectively. Among vedolizumab-treated patients, 36% were in CFR at W14, including 22% in CD and 44% in UC. At W52, 56% were in CFR, including 33% in CD and 69% in UC. Among ustekinumab-treated patients, 49% were in CFR at W14, including 54% in CD and 20% in UC. At W52, 55% were in CFR, including 57% in CD and 40% in UC. There was a significant increase in median growth velocity between W0 and W52 of +2 SD in vedolizumab-treated patients (p = 0.0002). Four adverse events were reported during vedolizumab treatment, none for ustekinumab-treated patients.

Vedolizumab and ustekinumab appear to be effective in inducing and maintaining CFR in pediatric-onset IBD. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.

Several population pharmacokinetic models of vedolizumab (VDZ) are available for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. However, their predictive performance in real-world clinical settings remains unknown. This study aims to externally evaluate the published VDZ pharmacokinetic models, focusing on their predictive performance and simulation-based clinical applicability.

A literature search was conducted through PubMed to identify VDZ population pharmacokinetic models. A total of 114 VDZ concentrations from 106 IBD patients treated at the University Medical Center "Zvezdara", Republic of Serbia, served as the external evaluation cohort. The predictive performance of the models was assessed using prediction- and simulation-based diagnostics. Furthermore, the models were utilized for Monte Carlo simulations to generate concentration-time profiles based on 24 covariate combinations specified within the models.

Four published pharmacokinetic models of VDZ were included in the evaluation. Using the external dataset, the median prediction error (MDPE) ranged from 13.82% to 25.57%, while the median absolute prediction error (MAPE) varied between 41.64% and 47.56%. None of the models fully met the combined criteria in the prediction-based diagnostics. However, in simulation-based diagnostics, pvcVPC showed satisfactory results, despite wide prediction intervals. Analysis of NPDE revealed that only the models by Rosario et al. and Okamoto et al. fulfilled the evaluation criteria. Simulation analysis further demonstrated that the median VDZ concentration remains above 12 μg/mL at week 22 during maintenance treatment for approximately 45-60% of patients with the best-case covariate combinations and an 8-week dosing frequency.

None of the published models satisfied the combined criteria (MDPE, MAPE, percentages of prediction error within ±20% and ±30%), rendering them unsuitable for a priori predictions. However, two models demonstrated better suitability for simulation-based applications.

Background/Objectives: Vedolizumab (VDZ) is approved in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD). VDZ exhibits considerable variability in its pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, and its exposure-response relationship is not yet fully understood. The aim was to investigate the variability in VDZ trough levels and PK parameters, to assess the relationship between VDZ PK and biochemical response, as well as clinical and endoscopic outcomes. Methods: We included 61 UC and 45 CD patients. Patients' data and trough VDZ concentrations were retrospectively obtained. Population PK analysis was performed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling with NONMEM (version 7.5). Graphs and statistical analyses were performed using R (version 4.1.3). Results: In total, 116 trough VDZ concentrations from 106 patients were described by a two-compartment model. For a typical patient, clearance (CL) was estimated at 0.159 L/day, while in patients previously treated with anti-TNFα agents, VDZ CL increased by 26.4% on average. In univariate binary logistic regression, VDZ trough concentration was not statistically significant predictor of remission, whereas CL was. Moreover, combined CL and faecal calprotectin (FCP) were a statistically significant predictors of remission. The hazard ratio (HR) for CL above 0.1886 L/day was 0.35 (p = 0.05) and for FCP below 250 µg/g was 2.66 (p = 0.02) in a time-to-event analysis. Conclusions: Our population PK model incorporates the effect of prior anti-TNFα agents on CL, suggesting its association with more severe forms of IBD. VDZ CL emerged as a more robust and clinically relevant predictor of remission in IBD patients than trough concentration.

We aimed to assess the risk of serious infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with vedolizumab compared with those treated with anti-tumor necrosis factors (TNF) and the general population.

In this Swedish cohort study, treatment episodes were identified from nationwide health registers. We used Cox regression with propensity score-matched cohorts to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for incident serious infections, defined as infections requiring hospital admission.

During 1,376 treatment episodes in Crohn's disease, the rate of serious infections per 100 person-years (PY) was 5.18 (95% CI = 3.98-6.63) with vedolizumab vs 3.54 (95% CI = 2.50-4.85) with anti-TNF; HR = 1.72 (95% CI = 1.12-2.65), partly explained by more gastrointestinal infections. Compared with the rate of 0.75/100 PY (95% CI = 0.59-0.92) in a matched general population cohort, vedolizumab demonstrated higher risk (HR = 7.00; 95% CI = 5.04-9.72). During 1,294 treatment episodes in ulcerative colitis, the corresponding rates were 3.74/100 PY (95% CI = 2.66-5.11) with vedolizumab vs 3.42/100 PY (95% CI = 2.31-4.89) with anti-TNF; HR = 0.80 (95% CI = 0.47-1.36) during the initial 1.1 years and HR = 2.03 (95% CI = 0.65-6.32) after 1.1 years (truncated due to nonproportional hazards). Pneumonia accounted for 40% of all infections among anti-TNF, whereas no case was observed among vedolizumab episodes. Compared with the rate of 0.69/100 PYs (95% CI = 0.53-0.87) in a matched general population cohort, vedolizumab showed an HR of 5.45 (95% CI = 3.67-8.11).

Vedolizumab was associated with increased risks of serious infections compared with anti-TNF in Crohn's disease but not in ulcerative colitis. Nonetheless, the panorama of serious infections seemed to differ between the drugs. Our findings underscore the importance of clinical awareness of infections and the safety profile of the 2 therapies.

The Crohn's Disease (CD) Activity Index (CDAI), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Questionnaire (IBDQ), and IBD-Fatigue (IBD-F) scale are useful patient-reported outcome (PRO) tools for assessing the treatment benefits of vedolizumab (VDZ) beyond clinical trial endpoints in patients with CD.

To assess clinical response, clinical remission, steroid-free remission, changes from baseline for PROs, and safety in a real-world cohort of patients with moderate-to-severe active CD treated with VDZ.

POLONEZ II was a multicenter, observational, prospective study across 10 Polish centers from April 2020 to October 2023 for 54 weeks in patients with CD eligible for reimbursed VDZ.

Primary endpoints at week 54 (W54) were clinical response (⩾70-point reduction in CDAI and >25% reduction vs baseline), remission (CDAI score ⩽150), and steroid-free remission. Other outcomes were changes in PROs (CDAI score and health-related quality of life) and safety. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed.

Of 98 patients with CD, the mean age was 35.2 years, 57.1% were male, and 72.4% had an ileocolonic disease. At W54 (n = 98), 63.3% of patients achieved clinical response, 48.0% remission, and 36.0% steroid-free remission. The durability of clinical response, remission, and steroid-free remission (W14-W54) were 68.9%, 62.9%, and 57.1%, respectively. By W54, a significant reduction in the PROs, such as the total CDAI score (p < 0.001), stool frequency (p < 0.001), abdominal pain score (p < 0.001), IBDQ (p < 0.001), IBD-F (p < 0.05), and fatigue impact on daily activities (p < 0.001), was observed. During VDZ treatment, arthralgia (23.7%-8.7%) and anemia (22.6%-15.9%) decreased between baseline and W54. Non-serious adverse events (SAEs; 12.2%), SAEs (7.1%), and VDZ-related rash (1.0%) were reported. Mean CD-related hospitalization duration decreased from baseline (10.2 days) to the end of the study (5.3 days).

POLONEZ II demonstrated long-term real-world benefits of VDZ toward effectiveness, safety, and improved PROs and patients' quality of life.

ENCePP (EUPAS32716).

Randomised placebo-controlled trials are the gold standard to assess novel drugs in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. However, there might be risks associated with receiving placebo. We aimed to examine the harms associated with receiving placebo in trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for the induction of remission in ulcerative colitis and luminal Crohn's disease in a meta-analysis.

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Embase Classic, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception to May 30, 2024, for randomised placebo-controlled trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for induction of remission in adults (≥18 years) with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis or luminal Crohn's disease reporting data on adverse events over a minimum treatment period of 4 weeks. There were no prespecified study exclusion criteria. We extracted summary data and pooled data using a random-effects model for any treatment-emergent adverse event, any drug-related adverse event, infection, worsening of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity, withdrawal due to adverse events, serious adverse events, serious infection, serious worsening of IBD activity, or venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), reporting relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024527341).

The search identified 10 826 citations, of which 47 trials including 20 987 patients (14 267 [68·0%] receiving active drug and 6720 [32·0%] receiving placebo) were eligible. The risk of any treatment-emergent adverse event was no different with active drug than with placebo (7660/14 267 [53·7%] patients on active drug vs 3758/6720 [55·9%] on placebo; RR 0·97, 95% CI 0·94-1·00; I2 =36%). However, the risks of worsening of IBD activity (563/13 473 [4·2%] vs 530/6252 [8·5%]; 0·48, 0·40-0·59; I2 =54%), withdrawal due to adverse event (401/13 363 [3·0%] vs 299/6267 [4·8%]; 0·62, 0·48-0·79; I2 =46%), serious adverse event (682/14 267 [4·8%] vs 483/6720 [7·2%]; 0·69, 0·59-0·80; I2 =30%), serious infection (140/14 194 [1·0%] vs 91/6647 [1·4%]; 0·67, 0·50-0·89; I2 =0%), serious worsening of IBD activity (187/11 271 [1·7%] vs 189/5056 [3·7%]; 0·45, 0·34-0·60; I2 =27%), or VTEs (13/7542 [0·2%] vs 12/2981 [0·4%]; 0·45, 0·21-0·94; I2 =0%) were all significantly lower with active drug than placebo. Numbers needed to treat with active drug to avoid these potentially serious adverse events ranged from 23 for worsening of IBD activity to 452 for VTEs. 27 randomised controlled trials were judged as low risk of bias across all domains.

Patients with moderately to severely active IBD receiving placebo are more likely to experience significant worsening of IBD activity and some serious adverse events, which might relate to a reduction in risk of these events with active drug. Patients should be counselled about these potential harms, and alternative trial designs to mitigate these harms should be considered.

None.

Real-world studies about the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Latin America are scarce. Our study describes the effectiveness and safety of VDZ in Colombian patients with IBD.

EXVEDOCOL (EXperience of VEDOlizumab in COLombia) was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study. Adults with IBD receiving a first dose of VDZ between July 2016 and October 2018 were included. The co-primary outcomes clinical response, and remission, were determined at week 14 and last visit during the maintenance phase (LVMP). The secondary outcomes, deep remission and loss of response were recorded at LVMP.

Thirty-one patients (25 ulcerative colitis (UC), 6 Crohn's disease (CD)) were included. At week 14, clinical response was achieved by 87.1% (27/31) of the patients treated with VDZ, while loss of response was reported in 6.7% (2/30). The remission rate at week 14 was 65.5% (19/29) and 75.9% (22/29) at LVMP. Prior anti-TNF exposure was reported in 61.3% (19 patients) of whom 84.2% (16/19) achieved clinical response at week 14 and 89.5% (17/19) at LVMP. For anti-TNF naïve patients, clinical response was recorded in 91.7% (11/12) at week 14 and 100% (12/12) at LVMP.

High clinical remission rates and safety profile highlight VDZ as a valuable treatment option for IBD patients. Anti-TNF naïve patients may derive greater benefit from therapy. Studies with larger cohorts could confirm these findings.

Crohn's disease is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that affects the gastrointestinal tract. Common biologic families used to treat Crohn's are tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α blockers (infliximab and adalimumab) and immune cell adhesion blockers (vedolizumab). Given their differing mechanisms of action, the ability to monitor response and predict treatment efficacy via easy-to-obtain blood draws remains an unmet need.

To investigate these gaps in knowledge, we leveraged 2 prospective cohorts (LOVE-CD, TAILORIX) and profiled their serum using high-dimensional isobaric-labeled proteomics before treatment and 6 weeks after treatment initiation with either vedolizumab or infliximab.

The proportion of patients endoscopically responding to treatment was comparable among infliximab and vedolizumab cohorts; however, the impact of vedolizumab on patient sera was negligible. In contrast, infliximab treatment induced a robust response including increased blood-gas regulatory response proteins, and concomitant decreases in inflammation-related proteins. Further analysis comparing infliximab responders and nonresponders revealed a lingering innate immune enrichments in nonresponders and a unique protease regulation signature related to clotting cascades in responders. Lastly, using samples prior to infliximab treatment, we highlight serum protein biomarkers that potentially predict a positive response to infliximab treatment.

These results will positively impact the determination of appropriate patient treatment and inform the selection of clinical trial outcome metrics.

Outcomes in intestinal transplantation remain hampered by higher rates of rejection than any other solid organs. However, maintenance immunosuppression regimens have largely remained unchanged despite advances in therapies for induction and treatment of rejection and graft-versus-host disease. Recently, there have been a small number of new maintenance therapies attempted, and older agents have been used in new ways to achieve better outcomes. The authors herein review the traditional maintenance therapies and their mechanisms and then consider updates in new therapies and new ways of using old therapies for maintenance immunosuppression after intestinal transplantation.

Recently, novel biologics or small molecular drugs have been introduced for overcoming the unmet needs associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor α agents for inflammtory bowel disease (IBD) treatment. Among these novel drugs, anti integrin agents block leukocyte trafficking to the intestine by blocking the interaction between integrin and cell adhesion molecules. Vedolizumab (anti-α4β7) is most widely used anti-integrin approved in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease .It has been shown to be effective in both induction and maintenance therapy with a favorable safety profile due to gut selectivity. Several models incorporating clinical, genetic, immune and gut microbial markers to predict response to vedolizumab in IBD have been developed. Etrolizumab (anti-β7) blocks leukocyte trafficking via α4β7 and cell adhesion via αEβ7 integrins. In addition, the introduction of subcutaneous vedolizumab showed similar efficacy and safety with improved patients' convenience. Other investigational anti-integrin therapies include abrilumab (anti-α4β7 IgG2), PN-943 (orally administered and gut-restricted α4β7 antagonist peptide), AJM300 (orally active small molecule inhibitor of α4), and ontamalimab (anti-MAdCAM-1 IgG).

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are distributed in various tissues and are used in clinical applications as a source of transplanted cells because of their easy harvestability. Although MSCs express numerous cell-surface antigens, single-cell analyses have revealed a highly heterogeneous cell population depending on the original tissue and donor conditions, including age and interindividual differences. This heterogeneity leads to differences in their functions, such as multipotency and immunomodulatory effects, making it challenging to effectively treat targeted diseases. The therapeutic efficacy of MSCs is controversial and depends on the implantation site. Thus, there is no established recipe for the transplantation of MSCs (including the type of disease, type of origin, method of cell culture, form of transplanted cells, and site of delivery). Our recent preclinical study identified appropriate MSCs and their suitable transplantation routes in a mouse model of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Three-dimensional (3D) cultures of MSCs have been demonstrated to enhance their properties and sustain engraftment at the lesion site. In this note, we explore the methods of MSC transplantation for treating IBDs, especially Crohn's disease, from clinical trials published over the past decade. Given the functional changes in MSCs in 3D culture, we also investigate the clinical trials using 3D constructs of MSCs and explore suitable diseases that might benefit from this approach. Furthermore, we discuss the advantages of the prospective isolation of MSCs in terms of interindividual variability. This note highlights the need to define the method of MSC transplantation, including interindividual variability, the culture period, and the transplantation route.

Rapidity of effect of advanced therapies for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) can be an essential decision parameter; however, comparative evaluation is lacking. We aimed to compare early response for advanced CD therapies in a network meta-analysis (NMA).

We searched systematically MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL up to 19 February 2024, for randomised controlled trials. The co-primary outcomes were induction of clinical remission (Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤150) and clinical response (≥100-point reduction in CDAI) within the first 6 weeks of treatment. We incorporated any assessment within this time point in a Bayesian random-effects NMA following PRISMA-NMA guidance (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022368509).

Twenty-five studies, comprising 7414 patients, were included. Infliximab combined with azathioprine or monotherapy ranked highest for induction of clinical remission within 6 weeks and was significantly superior to certolizumab, ustekinumab, guselkumab, vedolizumab, and upadacitinib. However, superiority over risankizumab 600 mg and adalimumab 160/80 mg was non-significant. Accordingly, infliximab in combination with azathioprine and guselkumab 600 mg ranked highest in the corresponding analysis of clinical response with no statistical significance demonstrated. Among bio-exposed patients, none of whom received infliximab, upadacitinib, and risankizumab induced the highest clinical responses. On the other hand, vedolizumab, certolizumab, and ustekinumab ranked lowest across the analyses.

We found infliximab to be ranked highest and superior to all other agents but risankizumab and adalimumab, demonstrating the highest probability of early induction of remission. Upadacitinib and risankizumab induced the highest clinical responses in bio-exposed patients. However, infliximab was not investigated in this population.

To analyze treatment persistence and treatment outcomes of vedolizumab as first-line biological treatment in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients in a Finnish real-world setting.

Observational, retrospective, multi-center chart review study that included adult CD and UC patients initiating vedolizumab as first-line biological treatment between 2014 and 2020.

The cohort consisted of 54 CD and 69 UC patients. At month 12, treatment persistence was 84.9 % in CD and 64.7 % in UC. Most vedolizumab discontinuations (CD, n = 11; UC, n = 26) were due to inefficacy. Discontinuations due to adverse events were rare (n < 5). Efficacy improvements were observed in treatment persistent patients at 12 months vs. baseline in the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (CD, 1.8 vs. 3.9, p = 0.001), Partial Mayo Score (UC, 1.0 vs. 4.9, p < 0.001), Physician's Global Assessment (CD, 0.9 vs. 1.8, p < 0.001; UC, 0.4 vs. 2.1, p < 0.001), along with positive endoscopic and biochemical outcomes. Clinical remission was 90.9 % vs. 63.0 % for CD, and 81.6 % vs. 12.3 % for UC, while corticosteroid use was 15.9 % vs. 53.7 % for CD, and 14.6 % vs. 92.8 % for UC at 12 months and baseline, respectively.

Vedolizumab was associated with improvements in efficacy, endoscopic activity, biochemical parameters, and decreased corticosteroid burden when used as a first-line biological treatment.

This study compares the effectiveness of different biologic therapies and sequences in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] using real-world data from a large cohort with long exposure.

Demographic, disease, treatment, and outcome data were retrieved for patients in the UK IBD BioResource. Effectiveness of treatment was based on persistence free of discontinuation or failure, analysed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for differences between groups.

In total, 13 222 evaluable patients received at least one biologic. In ulcerative colitis [UC] first-line vedolizumab [VDZ] demonstrated superior effectiveness over 5 years compared to anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] agents [p = 0.006]. VDZ was superior to both infliximab [IFX] and adalimumab [ADA] after ADA and IFX failure respectively [p < 0.001 and p < 0.001]. Anti-TNF therapy showed similar effectiveness when used as first-line treatment, or after failure of VDZ. In Crohn's disease [CD] we found significant differences between first-line treatments over 10 years [p = 0.045], with superior effectiveness of IFX compared to ADA in perianal CD. Non-anti-TNF biologics were superior to a second anti-TNF after first-line anti-TNF failure in CD [p = 0.035]. Patients with UC or CD experiencing TNF failure due to delayed loss of response or intolerance had superior outcomes when switching to a non-anti-TNF biologic, rather than a second anti-TNF.

We provide real-world evidence to guide biologic selection and sequencing in a range of common scenarios. Our findings challenge current guidelines regarding drug selection after loss of response to first anti-TNF treatment.

Crohn's disease [CD] symptoms are a main driver for impaired quality of life, and fast relief is important for patient care. Stool frequency [SF] and abdominal pain score [APS] are patient-reported outcomes [PROs] measuring symptom severity, which are supported as treatment targets by the STRIDE-II consensus. This post hoc analysis examined the efficacy of risankizumab [RZB], a humanised monoclonal antibody with high specificity for interleukin-23 p19, for providing early symptom relief, along with the prognostic value of early symptom relief for achieving future clinical and endoscopic endpoints.

Individual and combined measures of SF and AP at Weeks 1, 2, and 3 were assessed in patients with moderate to severe CD who received 600 mg intravenous RZB or placebo [PBO] in the ADVANCE or MOTIVATE induction studies. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the predictiveness of early symptom improvement for clinical and endoscopic outcomes following RZB induction and maintenance.

Higher rates of SF/APS clinical remission and enhanced clinical response were observed as early as Week 1 with RZB vs PBO. A larger proportion of patients achieved clinical endpoints with RZB vs PBO, irrespective of prior bio-failure status. Early PRO improvement was associated with a greater likelihood of achieving clinical and endoscopic improvement following 12-week induction and 52-week maintenance RZB dosing.

After the first intravenous RZB induction dose, significantly greater rates of symptom improvement vs PBO were achieved. Improvements could be observed as early as Week 1 and were predictive of Weeks 12 and 52 clinical and endoscopic improvement.