Reference Citation Analysis: Find an Article, Find a Category, Find a Journal, Find a Scholar

For: Miranda CJ. Intra-abdominal pressure and abdominal perfusion pressure early in severe acute pancreatitis misses the forest for the trees. J Gastrointest Surg 2011;15:2300; author reply 2301. [PMID: 21948182 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1701-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2011] [Accepted: 09/14/2011] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]

For:	Miranda CJ. Intra-abdominal pressure and abdominal perfusion pressure early in severe acute pancreatitis misses the forest for the trees. J Gastrointest Surg 2011;15:2300; author reply 2301. [PMID: 21948182 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1701-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2011] [Accepted: 09/14/2011] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]

Number	Cited by Other Article(s)
1	Jaipuria J, Bhandari V, Chawla AS, Singh M. Intra-abdominal pressure: Time ripe to revise management guidelines of acute pancreatitis? World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2016;7:186-98. [PMID: 26909242 PMCID: PMC4753186 DOI: 10.4291/wjgp.v7.i1.186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2015] [Revised: 09/08/2015] [Accepted: 11/03/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open Abstract AIM To systematically review evidence on pathophysiology of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in acute pancreatitis (AP) with its clinical correlates. METHODS Systematic review of available evidence in English literature with relevant medical subject heading terms on PubMed, Medline and Scopus with further search from open access sources on internet as suggested by articles retrieved. RESULTS Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is increasingly gaining recognition as a point of specific intervention with potential to alter disease outcome and improve mortality in AP. IAH can be expected in at least 17% of patients presenting with diagnosis of AP to a typical tertiary care hospital (prevalence increasing to 50% in those with severe disease). Abdominal compartment syndrome can be expected in at least 15% patients with severe disease. Recent guidelines on management of AP do not acknowledge utility of surveillance for IAP other than those by Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. We further outline pathophysiologic mechanisms of IAH; understanding of which advances our knowledge and helps to coherently align common observed variations in management related conundrums (such as fluid therapy, nutrition and antibiotic prophylaxis) with potential to further individualize treatment in AP. CONCLUSION We suggest that IAP be given its due place in future practice guidelines and that recommendations be formed with help of a broader panel with inclusion of clinicians experienced in management of IAH. Collapse Key Words Abdominal compartment syndrome Intra-abdominal hypertension Pancreatitis Practice guideline Collapse MESH Headings Collapse Grants Collapse Affiliation(s) Collapse Collaborators Collapse
2	Hua R. Effects of programed emergency care in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2015;23:1656-1659. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v23.i10.1656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open Abstract AIM: To evaluate the effects of programed emergency care in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with severe acute pancreatitis treated from January 2013 to December 2013 at our hospital were included in an observation group to implement programed emergency care, and 55 patients with severe acute pancreatitis treated from January 2012 to December 2012 at our hospital were included in a control group to receive routine emergency care. The length of hospital stay after intervention, satisfaction to nursing care, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) and Spitzer quality of life score were compared for the two groups. RESULTS: In the observation group, 39 (67.2%) cases were very satisfied, 18 (31.0%) satisfied, and 1 (1.7%) not satisfied with the nursing care. The corresponding figures in the control group were 23 (41.8%), 25 (45.5%), and 7 (12.7%), respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.05). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the observation group than in the control group (15.4 d ± 2.2 d vs 21.4 d ± 4.6 d, P < 0.01). KPS score was significantly higher in the observation group (76.9 ± 14.3 vs 61.4 ± 10.2, P < 0.01), and the scores of all dimensions of the quality of life scale were significantly higher in the observation group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Implementation of programed emergency nursing care in patients with severe acute pancreatitis can significantly reduce hospital stay and improve patient's satisfaction to nursing work, patient's health status, and quality of life. Collapse Key Words Programed emergency care Severe acute pancreatitis Quality of life Collapse MESH Headings Collapse Grants Collapse Affiliation(s) Collapse Collaborators Collapse