Diagnostic Advances
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Radiol. Aug 28, 2016; 8(8): 729-734
Published online Aug 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i8.729
Table 1 Classification of solitary pulmonary nodule malignancy adopted in the current study
ClassProbability of malignancy
1Minimal risk; almost certainly benign
2Low risk; probably benign
3Intermediate risk; not further characterizable
4High risk; probably malignant
5Very high risk; almost certainly malignant
Table 2 Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values before and following disclosure of the computer-aided diagnosis data for the different raters
RaterSPNsAUC blindedAUC unfoldedDifferenceSignificance
95%CI95%CI
BIMC940.845---
0.755-0.911
Rater 1940.7340.7690.035P = 0.3329
0.633-0.8200.671-0.850
Rater 2940.7880.8200.032P = 0.2170
0.691-0.8650.727-0.892
Rater 3940.7880.8300.042P = 0.0592
0.692-0.8660.738-0.899
Rater 4940.7390.7950.056P = 0.0048
0.639-0.8250.699-0.871
Rater 5940.7510.8150.064P = 0.0300
0.651-0.8340.721-0.887
Rater 6940.8360.833-0.003P = 0.9308
0.745-0.9040.742-0.902
Rater 7940.6820.7560.074P = 0.0054
0.578-0.7740.657-0.839
Overall6580.7580.8030.045P = 0.0003
0.723-0.7900.770-0.833
Table 3 Mean number of predicted solitary pulmonary nodules for each risk class considered, before (pre-computer-aided diagnosis) and after (post-computer-aided diagnosis) computer-aided diagnosis result disclosure
Risk classBenign SPNs
Malignant SPNs
Pre-CADPost-CADPre-CADPost-CAD
16.7113.431.861.86
212.436.868.437.14
36.433.7117.4311.29
43.575.0015.2915.57
52.863.0019.0026.14