Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Radiol. Jul 28, 2016; 8(7): 693-699
Published online Jul 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i7.693
Table 1 Comparison of contrast-to-noise ratios of aorta, portal vein, right portal vein and left portal vein to liver parenchyma in the iohexol 350 and iodixanol 270 group, with the resulting P values
Iohexol 350 groupIodixanol 270 groupP value
Arterial Phase AcquisitionCNR Aorta/liver10.83 ± 3.00915.33 ± 6.480.0040
CNR PV/liver1.77 ± 1.553.40 ± 1.880.0005
CNR RPV/liver1.53 ± 1.872.47 ± 1.820.0129
CNR LPV/liver1.18 ± 1.512.36 ± 1.810.0109
Portal Phase AcquisitionCNR Aorta/liver3.30 ± 1.643.44 ± 1.400.7369
CNR PV/liver4.85 ± 1.527.38 ± 2.890.0001
CNR RPV/liver4.49 ± 1.616.92 ± 2.58< 0.0001
CNR LPV/liver4.43 ± 2.326.82 ± 2.270.0002
Table 2 Analysis and comparison of focal liver lesions
Iohexol 350 group
Iodixanol 270 group
P values
No. of lesionsMean diameter(mm)CNRNo. of lesionsMean diameter (mm)CNR
Hypervascular lesions/arterial phase1214.8 ± 8.232.522 ± 1.6991718.1 ± 8.152.266 ± 1.2430.8532
Hypodense lesions/portal phase2328.2 ± 19.52.483 ± 1.1872824.1 ± 17.83.744 ± 2.2550.0194
Hypodense lesions/equilibrium phase2128.4 ± 20.91.972 ± 0.9155819.3 ± 11.02.395 ± 1.2020.3162