Case Control Study
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Radiol. Dec 28, 2014; 6(12): 907-912
Published online Dec 28, 2014. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i12.907
Table 1 Quantitative score assessment of bowel distension
Duodenum mean± SDMann Whitney P valueJejunum mean ± SDMann Whitney P valueIleum mean± SDMann Whitney P value
First radiologist0.0090.620.014
Positive9.1 ± 0.63315.3 ± 0.8115.6 ± 0.66
Neutral13.3 ± 1.0914.76 ± 0.7518.1 ± 0.71
Total11.2 ± 0.6615.03 ± 0.5516.8 ± 0.5
Second radiologist0.0180.590.02
Positive9.08 ± 0.6515.3 ± 0.8815.4 ± 0.65
Neutral12.88 ± 1.0714.68 ± 0.7618.1 ± 0.65
Total11.0 ± 0.6514.99 ± 0.5516.77 ± 0.48
Spearman correlation0.9970.9890.997
Table 2 Radiologists’ satisfaction with image quality
ScoreFirst radiologist
Second radiologist
NeutralPositiveP valueNeutralPositiveP value
Satisfaction
0048250
186< 0.00048< 0.000
2634830
30426
4868846
Kappa correlation0.839
Table 3 Quantitative assessment of mural delineation
ScoreFirst radiologist
Second radiologist
PositiveNeutralP valuePositiveNeutralP value
Wall delineation
0620662
11410< 0.0001480.004
222101810
320080
40802
Kappa correlation0.894