1
|
Lee K, Park JM, Yoon SY, Kim MS, Kim YW, Shin JI, Lee SC. Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Hydrodissection for the Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Yonsei Med J 2025; 66:111-120. [PMID: 39894044 PMCID: PMC11790405 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2024.0089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Revised: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Ultrasound-guided nerve hydrodissection has emerged as a potential non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The objective of this research was to offer suggestions for optimizing injectables utilized in hydrodissection for the treatment of CTS through a systematic review and network meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through April 25, 2024. Effect sizes were quantified using standard mean differences within a random-effects model. Effectiveness ranking for each treatment was expressed as the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). RESULTS Nine studies with 458 patients with CTS were included. According to SUCRA, 5% dextrose (DW) was the most effective option for the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) function at 99.9, 89.8, and 88.8 at 4, 12, and 24 weeks, respectively; for BCTQ symptoms, 5% DW was the most effective option at 99.9 at 4 weeks and platelet-rich plasma at 95.7 and 93.9 at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively. In terms of both BCTQ symptoms and BCTQ function, the 5 cc injection was the most effective, with SUCRA values of 99.5 for both categories. However, the effectiveness of the electrodiagnostic assessment and ultrasound variables was dependent on the type and dose of medication. CONCLUSION Administration of 5% DW showed better results in terms of initial symptom relief and long-term functional recovery compared to other agents, while platelet-rich plasma showed greater long-term symptom improvement; an injection dose of 5 cc showed the greatest benefit. However, additional research is required to establish precise protocols based on disease severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- KunWook Lee
- Department and Research Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Mi Park
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea
| | - Seo Yeon Yoon
- Department and Research Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Seo Kim
- Cardiovascular Disease Initiative, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yong Wook Kim
- Department and Research Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Il Shin
- Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- The Center for Medical Education Training and Professional Development in Yonsei-Donggok Medical Education Institute, Seoul, Korea
- Severance Underwood Meta-Research Center, Institute of Convergence Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Sang Chul Lee
- Department and Research Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tierney DM, Shen-Wagner J, Dalal P. Outpatient Point-of-Care Ultrasound. Med Clin North Am 2025; 109:203-216. [PMID: 39567094 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2024.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2024]
Abstract
The most commonly used outpatient primary care point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) applications are similar to those used in the inpatient setting (eg, cardiac, pulmonary, and abdominal ultrasound). However, there are several additional POCUS applications that are highly applicable to the outpatient setting and should be considered for use by primary care practitioners. This article reviews 3 outpatient POCUS applications and their potential role in the primary care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Tierney
- Department of Graduate Medical Education, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Allina Health, 800 East 28th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55407, USA; Department of & Internal Medicine, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Allina Health, 800 East 28th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55407, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | - Joy Shen-Wagner
- Department of Family Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, 877 West Faris Road, Greenville, SC 29605, USA
| | - Puja Dalal
- Novant Health Family Medicine Residency Program, Novant Health, Cornelius, NC 2803, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mengi A, Bulut GT. Comparison of the Impact of Out-of-plane and In-plane Injection Approaches on Injection Pain and Functionality in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Undergoing Ultrasound-guided Injection: A Patient- and Assessor-blinded Randomized Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2024; 105:2054-2061. [PMID: 39009331 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the out-of-plane (OP) and in-plane (IP) approaches for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in terms of pain during injection and postinjection adverse effects, and to investigate whether these approaches led to any difference in terms of pain/numbness, symptom severity, functionality, and median nerve cross-sectional area and to examine the relationship of these parameters with the pain during injection. DESIGN Patient/assessor-blinded randomized study. SETTING Hospital outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS Fifty patients with mild-to-moderate CTS. INTERVENTIONS The participants were randomized into OP and IP (both n=25) ultrasound-guided injection groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Each patient reported the pain felt during the injection at 1 hour thereafter, and also any adverse effects at 4 weeks after injection. Before and 4 weeks after injection, patients used a visual analog scale to indicate pain/numbness; symptom severity and functionality were assessed using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire. The cross-sectional area of the median nerve was also obtained. RESULTS The average pain during injection was 2.64±0.82 in the IP group and 1.96±0.86 in the OP group (P=.017). Postinjection adverse effects were similar between the 2 groups (P<.05). After injection, the percentage change in symptom severity was 49.8±11.8 in the IP group and 40.6±11.5 in the OP group (P=.008). In the IP group, day preinjection pain/numbness, night pain/numbness percentage change scores, and symptom severity percentage change scores were moderately correlated with the pain during injection (r=.439, .469, and .429, respectively). CONCLUSIONS IP injection caused greater pain during injection than OP injection and led to greater reduction in symptom severity at 1 month after injection. In that group, injection pain was associated with the baseline day pain score, change in night pain score, and change in symptom severity score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alper Mengi
- Department of Pain Management, Edirne Sultan 1. Murat State Hospital, Edirne, Turkey.
| | - Gül Tugba Bulut
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McCarty JC, Eberlin KR. Discussion: Predictors and Variation in Steroid Injection Use for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome from a Multicenter Quality Collaborative. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 153:1083-1084. [PMID: 38657009 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000011218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Justin C McCarty
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| | - Kyle R Eberlin
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Balser DY, Schwanz KL, Wheelock CJ, Crosby M, Schuerger W, Walters L, Weyrauch S, Senk AM. Comparison of Comfort and Patient Preference of Common and a Novel Position for Ultrasound-Guided Carpal Tunnel Injections. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2024; 43:751-760. [PMID: 38240323 DOI: 10.1002/jum.16401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study compared levels of discomfort among three positions for ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel injections (USCTI) to potentially facilitate and improve the procedure's tolerability in treating carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS Ambulatory Veterans referred for electromyography (EMG) evaluation of CTS were eligible for the study; a total of 30 participants were evaluated. Participants were asked to hold three different positions: 1) Hypersupination, 2) Airplane, and 3) total supported abduction (TSA). Participants rated their pain level, ease of performing/holding each position, exacerbation of underlying symptoms, and position preference. Results were analyzed with two-way repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS Hypersupination was determined to be the least preferred and most painful position to hold, demonstrating a statistically significant increase in the Numeric Rating Scale score for pain during the procedure compared with Airplane and TSA, which were not significantly different from one another. Pre-procedure neck, shoulder, elbow, and wrist pain were not significantly associated with intra-procedure pain. CONCLUSIONS When performing USCTI, patient comfort can be optimized by avoiding Hypersupination. Utilizing the Airplane or TSA positions may provide similar access for ulnar approach injections while inducing lower levels of discomfort. Clinical space, resources, patient mobility, and laterality of procedures may further guide one's selection among the positions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Y Balser
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kersten L Schwanz
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Corey J Wheelock
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Schwab Rehabilitation Hospital and Care Network, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Margaret Crosby
- Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Willis Schuerger
- Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Luke Walters
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sarah Weyrauch
- School of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Alexander M Senk
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lnu S, Biswas A. A Comparative Study of Effectiveness of Splinting and Splinting Plus Local Corticosteroid Injection in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cureus 2024; 16:e52868. [PMID: 38406125 PMCID: PMC10890796 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Corticosteroid injection and wrist-hand splint are two of the most commonly used conservative options for the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). This study compares the effectiveness of splinting and splinting plus local steroid injection in improving clinical and nerve conduction findings of patients with CTS. Methods A total of 44 patients with CTS were randomized into two groups. Group A used a full-time neutral wrist splint and group B was injected with 20 mg of triamcinolone acetonide and was given a full-time neutral wrist splint for 12 weeks. Clinical and nerve conduction findings of the patients were evaluated at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks after interventions. The chi-square test was used to test the association of different study variables. Z-test was used to test the significant difference between the two proportions. The means were compared by t-test. ANOVA was used to compare more than two mean values. Results The mean difference of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire and median nerve latency at baseline and 12th week after treatment was significantly higher in group B than in group A (p<0.05). In intragroup comparison, there was significant improvement in the patient satisfaction, and clinical and nerve conduction values between the baseline level and 4 weeks after intervention and between the baseline and 12 weeks after intervention (P < 0.01). However, the inter-group comparisons were not significant. Conclusion Both of the management methods (splinting plus corticosteroid injection and splinting) have significant effects on the improvement of symptoms, and functional and nerve conduction status. It seems that splinting plus corticosteroid injection has a little edge over splinting alone during the follow-up periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shikha Lnu
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna, IND
| | - Anurug Biswas
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Patna, IND
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kumar N, Chandan SK, Jalan D, Sinha S, Jaiswal B, Singh DK. Ultrasound-guided interventions in primary carpal tunnel syndrome: perineural injection to thread carpal tunnel release. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20230552. [PMID: 37660684 PMCID: PMC10546448 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20230552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the most common entrapment neuropathy, is compression of the median nerve deep to transverse carpal ligament at wrist. Ultrasonography and electrophysiological study are complementary in the diagnosis and grading of CTS in appropriate clinical settings. The initial management of patients with CTS is conservative with medical therapy and splinting. However, surgical interventions are indicated in patients in whom medical management has failed. With evolution of the concept of safe zone on ultrasonography and identification of the sonoanatomical landmarks of carpal tunnel in greater detail, Ultrasonography-guided interventions are safer and preferred over surgical management in CTS. The primary ultrasonography-guided interventions include perineural injection, perineural hydrodissection and ultrasonography-guided release of transverse carpal ligament. This review article presents the principles of ultrasonography-guided perineural injection, perineural hydrodissection in CTS, the merits and demerits of injectant used in perineural injection/ hydrodissection, and percutaneous ultrasonography-guided thread release of transverse carpal ligament utilizing the concept of safe zone of the ultrasonography-guided interventions for CTS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nishith Kumar
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Shishir Kumar Chandan
- Department of Neurology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Divesh Jalan
- Central Institute of Orthopaedics, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Skand Sinha
- Sports Injury Centre, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Binita Jaiswal
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Dharmendra Kumar Singh
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zeng Z, Lin N, Chen CX. Comparison efficacy of ultrasound-guided needle release plus corticosteroid injection and mini-open surgery in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Front Neurol 2023; 14:1158688. [PMID: 37064174 PMCID: PMC10090491 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1158688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
This retrospective study was to compare clinical outcomes of ultrasound-guided needle release with corticosteroid injection vs. mini-open surgery in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). From January 2021 to December 2021, 40 patients (40 wrists) with CTS were analyzed in this study. The diagnosis was based on clinical symptoms, electrophysiological imaging, and ultrasound imaging. A total of 20 wrists were treated with ultrasound-guided needle release plus corticosteroid injection (Group A), and the other 20 wrists were treated with mini-open surgery (Group B). We evaluated the Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire, electrophysiological parameters (distal motor latency, sensory conduction velocity, and sensory nerve action potential of the median nerve), and ultrasound parameters (cross-sectional area, flattening ratio, and the thicknesses of transverse carpal ligament) both before and 3 months after treatment. Total treatment cost, duration of treatment, healing time, and complications were also recorded for the two groups. The Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire and electrophysiological and ultrasound outcomes at preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively had a significant difference for each group (each with P < 0.05). There were no complications such as infection, hemorrhage, vascular, nerve, or tendon injuries in both groups. Ultrasound-guided needle release and mini-open surgery are both effective measures in treating CTS patients. Ultrasound-guided needle release plus corticosteroid injection provides smaller incision, less cost, less time of treatment, and faster recovery compared with mini-open surgery. Ultrasound-guided needle release plus corticosteroid injection is better for clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeng Zeng
- Cancer Center, Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Nan Lin
- Plastic Surgery Center, Department of Hand and Reconstruct Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Cong-Xian Chen
- Cancer Center, Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- *Correspondence: Cong-Xian Chen
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lam KHS, Wu YT, Reeves KD, Galluccio F, Allam AES, Peng PWH. Ultrasound-Guided Interventions for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13061138. [PMID: 36980446 PMCID: PMC10046938 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13061138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral entrapment, and recently, ultrasound-guided perineural injection (UPIT) and percutaneous flexor retinaculum release (UPCTR) have been utilized to treat CTS. However, no systematic review or meta-analysis has included both intervention types of ultrasound-guided interventions for CTS. Therefore, we performed this review using four databases (i.e., PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane) to evaluate the quality of evidence, effectiveness, and safety of the published studies on ultrasound-guided interventions in CTS. Among sixty studies selected for systemic review, 20 randomized treatment comparison or controlled studies were included in six meta-analyses. Steroid UPIT with ultrasound guidance outperformed that with landmark guidance. UPIT with higher-dose steroids outperformed that with lower-dose steroids. UPIT with 5% dextrose in water (D5W) outperformed control injection and hydrodissection with high-volume D5W was superior to that with low-volume D5W. UPIT with platelet-rich plasma outperformed various control treatments. UPCTR outperformed open surgery in terms of symptom improvement but not functional improvement. No serious adverse events were reported in the studies reviewed. The findings suggest that both UPIT and UPCTR may provide clinically important benefits and appear safe. Further treatment comparison studies are required to determine comparative therapeutic efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- King Hei Stanley Lam
- The Department of Clinical Research, The Hong Kong Institute of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Hong Kong
- Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Center for Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- Center for Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 402, Taiwan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +852-23720888
| | - Yung-Tsan Wu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan
- Integrated Pain Management Center, Tri-Service General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan
- Department of Research and Development, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan
| | - Kenneth Dean Reeves
- Private Practice PM&R and Pain Management, 4840 El Monte, Roeland Park, KS 66205, USA
| | - Felice Galluccio
- Center for Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
- Fisiotech Lab. Studio, Rheumatology and Pain Management, 50136 Firenze, Italy
- Morphological Madrid Research Center (MoMaRC), 10107 Madrid, Spain
| | - Abdallah El-Sayed Allam
- Morphological Madrid Research Center (MoMaRC), 10107 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
- Clinical Neurophysiology Fellowship, Arab Board of Health Specializations, Ministry of Health, Baghdad 61298, Iraq
| | - Philip W. H. Peng
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ashworth NL, Bland JDP, Chapman KM, Tardif G, Albarqouni L, Nagendran A. Local corticosteroid injection versus placebo for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 2:CD015148. [PMID: 36722795 PMCID: PMC9891198 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a very common clinical syndrome manifested by signs and symptoms of irritation of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel in the wrist. Direct and indirect costs of CTS are substantial, with estimated costs of two billion US dollars for CTS surgery in the USA in 1995 alone. Local corticosteroid injection has been used as a non-surgical treatment for CTS many years, but its effectiveness is still debated. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of corticosteroids injected in or around the carpal tunnel for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome compared to no treatment or a placebo injection. SEARCH METHODS We used standard, extensive Cochrane search Methods. The searches were 7 June 2020 and 26 May 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-randomised trials of adults with CTS that included at least one comparison group of local injection of corticosteroid (LCI) into the wrist and one group that received a placebo or no treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcome was 1. improvement in symptoms at up to three months of follow-up. Our secondary outcomes were 2. functional improvement, 3. improvement in symptoms at greater than three months of follow-up, 4. improvement in neurophysiological parameters, 5. improvement in imaging parameters, 6. requirement for carpal tunnel surgery, 7. improvement in quality of life and 8. ADVERSE EVENTS We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS We included 14 trials with 994 participants/hands with CTS. Only nine studies (639 participants/hands) had useable data quantitatively and in general, these studies were at low risk of bias except for one quite high-risk study. The trials were conducted in hospital-based clinics across North America, Europe, Asia and the Middle East. All trials used participant-reported outcome measures for symptoms, function and quality of life. There is probably an improvement in symptoms measured at up to three months of follow-up favouring LCI (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.94 to -0.59; 8 RCTs, 579 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Up to six months this was still evident favouring LCI (SMD -0.58, 95% CI -0.89 to -0.28; 4 RCTs, 234 participants/hands; moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably an improvement in function measured at up to three months favouring LCI (SMD -0.62, 95% CI -0.87 to -0.38; 7 RCTs, 499 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We are uncertain if there is a difference in median nerve DML at up to three months of follow-up (mean difference (MD) -0.37 ms, 95% CI -0.75 to 0.02; 6 RCTs, 359 participants/hands; very low-certainty evidence). The requirement for surgery probably reduces slightly in the LCI group at one year (risk ratio 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.98; 1 RCT, 111 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). Quality of life, measured at up to three months of follow-up using the Short-Form 6 Dimensions questionnaire (scale from 0.29 to 1.0; higher is better) probably improved slightly in the LCI group (MD 0.07, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.12; 1 RCT, 111 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events were uncommon (low-certainty evidence). One study reported 2/364 injections resulted in severe pain which resolved over "several weeks" and 1/364 injections caused a "sympathetic reaction" with a cool, pale hand that completely resolved in 20 minutes. One study (111 participants) reported no serious adverse events, but 65% of LCI-injected and 16% of the placebo-injected participants experienced mild-to-moderate pain lasting less than two weeks. About 9% of participants experienced localised swelling lasting less than two weeks. Four studies (229 participants) reported that they experienced no adverse events in their studies. Three studies (220 participants) did not specifically report adverse events. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Local corticosteroid injection is effective for the treatment of mild and moderate CTS with benefits lasting up to six months and a reduced need for surgery up to 12 months. Where serious adverse events were reported, they were rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeremy D P Bland
- Electroencephalography (EEG) Department, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Trust, Canterbury, UK
| | - Kristine M Chapman
- Neuromuscular Disease Unit, Diamond Health Care Centre, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Gaetan Tardif
- Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Loai Albarqouni
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Arjuna Nagendran
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nasiri A, Rezaei Motlagh F, Vafaei MA. Efficacy comparison between ultrasound-guided injections of 5% dextrose with corticosteroids in carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Neurol Res 2023; 45:554-563. [PMID: 36617808 DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2022.2164453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no standard guideline for treating mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). 5% dextrose perineural injection has been a potential and innovative treatment with long-term effects for CTS; however, there is few published randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of 5% dextrose perineural injection versus corticosteroid injection in treating CTS. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this double-blinded randomized active-controlled trial, we randomly allocated 1 session of either 2 cc 5% dextrose or 1 cc methylprednisolone acetate mixed with 1 cc normal saline in 36 patients with mild to moderate CTS of single or both their wrists. The baseline VAS, BCTQ, electrophysiological studies, and sonography assessment of median nerve CSA were carried out at the baseline and 1-month and 3-month follow-ups, as well as recording demographic variables. RESULTS A statistically significant decreasing trend in VAS (P < 0.0001), BCTQ-ss (P < 0.0001), median nerve CSA (P = 0.05), SNAP-PL (P < 0.0001), and CMAP-OL (P = 0.048) in both methylprednisolone and 5% dextrose groups was observed. No significant difference was observed in slope of the trend of studied parameters, including VAS (P = 0.95), BCTQ-ss (P = 0.88), BCTQ-F (P = 0.34), median nerve CSA (P = 0.321), SNAP-PL (P = 0.9), CMAP-OL (P = 0.799), SNAP-amplitude (P = 0.798), and CMAP-amplitude (P = 0.584). CONCLUSION 5% dextrose perineural injection is an effective and safe treatment for mild to moderate CTS, in comparison with the short-term results attained from corticosteroids. Further randomized clinical trials with longer follow-up periods are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aref Nasiri
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Farzaneh Rezaei Motlagh
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Amin Vafaei
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yeom JW, Cho JH, Kim SJ, Lee HI. Cross-Sectional Area of the Median Nerve as a Prognostic Indicator in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Treated With Local Steroid Injection. J Hand Surg Am 2023; 48:85.e1-85.e10. [PMID: 34839963 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Local steroid injection is an effective treatment modality for carpal tunnel syndrome. This study aimed to investigate the success rate of ultrasonography-guided local steroid injection and determine the prognostic value of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve for steroid injection. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 40 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome whose median nerve CSA was >15 mm2 (large-CSA group; n = 16) or ≤15 mm2 (small-CSA group; n = 24). The CSA was measured using ultrasonography, and all the patients were treated with ultrasonography-guided corticosteroid injection. Demographic characteristics, symptoms, initial QuickDASH score, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaires, and results of the nerve conduction study were assessed at baseline. Treatment success was defined in this study as the absence of symptom recurrence within the entire follow-up period. RESULTS The treatment success rate was 45% (n = 18) after an average follow-up of 16 months. Overall, 11 patients (28%) underwent carpal tunnel release on an average of 11 months after steroid injection. The large-CSA group showed a significantly worse grade of electrodiagnostic testing at baseline than did the small-CSA group; however, there was no significant difference in final Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaires symptom score (1.7 vs 1.8, respectively) and the rate of continued treatment success at the last follow-up (42% vs 50%, respectively). The proportions of patients who required carpal tunnel decompression were 29% and 25% in the small-CSA and large-CSA groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Local steroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome has an overall success rate of 45% after a mean follow-up of 16 months. Preinjection CSA was not associated with whether the steroid injection was considered successful. This indicates that increased median nerve CSA does not preclude the possibility of symptomatic relief after a local steroid injection. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Woong Yeom
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Goyang, Korea of Republic
| | - Jin-Ho Cho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Goyang, Korea of Republic
| | - Seung Joo Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Goyang, Korea of Republic
| | - Hyun Il Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Goyang, Korea of Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Effect of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-guided local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:545-561. [PMID: 35635576 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04437-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), the commonest neuropathy of the upper limb, can be managed with different therapeutic approaches. Local corticosteroid injection has been adopted widely in clinical practice, as it showed great efficacy in treating CTS. However, the best injection technique continues to be a subject of controversy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided (US-guided) versus landmark-guided (LM-guided) corticosteroid injection on the clinical and electrophysiological outcomes in patients with CTS. METHODS We performed a systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL, from which we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared US-guided and LM-based corticosteroid injection in treating individuals with CTS. We evaluated the following outcomes: Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire functional status scale (BCTQ-FSS) and symptom severity scale (BCTQ-SSS), and adverse event rate. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to represent continuous outcomes, while the risk ratio (RR) was used to represent dichotomous outcome. RESULTS A total of 8 RCTs that enrolled 500 wrists were deemed eligible. US-guided injection showed a significantly better BCTQ-FSS (SMD = -0.22, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.04), BCTQ-SSS (SMD = -0.77, 95% CI -1.22 to -0.31), and adverse event rate (RR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.49) compared to LM-based injection. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis showed the superiority of US-guided corticosteroid injection over LM-guided corticosteroid injection in enhancing functional status, improving symptom severity, and reducing the adverse event rate in individuals with CTS.
Collapse
|
14
|
Jiang J, Xing F, Luo R, Liu M. Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and meta-Analysis of Current Evidence in Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:834213. [PMID: 35571114 PMCID: PMC9092282 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.834213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Recently, there was a series of clinical studies focusing on local injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for treatment of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, the safety and efficacy of PRP in these CTS patients remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to compare PRP with other conservative treatments in treatment of CTS patients. Methods: We systematically searched from electronic databases (Cochrane, PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE) up to 10 December 2021. The data of clinical results were extracted and analyzed by RevMan Manager 5.4. Results: Finally, eight randomized controlled studies, involving 220 CTS patients undergoing local injection of PRP were enrolled in this systematic review. All enrolled trials were considered to be of high quality. In the short-term efficacy, the PRP group was significantly lower in symptom severity scale (SSS) compared with the control group (MD = −2.00; 95% CI, −3.15 to −0.85; p = 0.0007; I2 = 0%). In the mid-term efficacy, the PRP group was significantly effective than the control group in the visual analogue scale (MD = −0.63; 95% CI, −1.22 to −0.04; p = 0.04; I2 = 61%), SSS (MD = −3.56; 95% CI, −4.93 to −2.18; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%), functional status scale (MD = −2.29; 95% CI, −3.03 to −1.56; p < 0.00001; I2 = 45%), sensory peak latency (MD = −0.39; 95% CI, −0.58 to −0.19; p = 0.0001; I2 = 0%) and cross-sectional area of median nerve (MD = -0.20; 95% CI, −0.31 to −0.10; p = 0.0002; I2 = 0%). In the mid-long-term efficacy, the PRP group was only significantly lower in SSS compared with the control group (MD = −2.71; 95% CI, −4.33 to −1.10; p = 0.001; I2 = 38%). Conclusion: Local PRP injection is more effective than other conservative treatments in terms of mid-term efficacy in relieving pain, improving wrist function and symptoms, reducing MN swelling, and partially improving electrophysiological indicators. However, the long-term adverse side and consensus on standardization of PRP in CTS patients still need further large-scale trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiabao Jiang
- Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Fei Xing
- Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Rong Luo
- Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ming Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Goru P, Butaliu GC, Verma GG, Haque S, Mustafa A, Paul A. Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided local steroid injection to the wrist for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: Is it worth it? EGYPTIAN RHEUMATOLOGY AND REHABILITATION 2022. [DOI: 10.1186/s43166-022-00121-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is caused by compression of the median nerve at the wrist level and the most frequent entrapment neuropathy in the upper limb. It can be treated with surgical or non-surgical methods. When nonsurgical treatment is indicated, a local corticosteroid injection into the carpal tunnel can be used to reduce pain and tingling sensation. To assess the clinical outcomes and effectiveness of patient satisfaction following ultrasound-guided steroid injection for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.
Results
The study comprises 44 female (73%) and 16 (27%) male patients, with a mean age of 57 (27–84) years. Thirty-one patients were left-handed and 29 right-handed. Twenty-six (43%) injections were performed on the right side, 8 (13%) on the left, and 26 were bilateral. Fifty-six hands of thirty-seven (70%) patients reported significant improvement symptoms, five (8%) had temporary improvement with recurrence, seventeen patients (28%) failed to improve, and one patient’s symptoms have resolved before intervention. Among temporary responders and nonresponders, two were referred to the neurologist for further evaluation. Out of twenty patients, fourteen patients (23%) had surgical decompression of carpal tunnel with complete resolution of symptoms, four patients had opted for repeat injections, and two patients refused any further intervention.
Conclusions
The use of ultrasound-guided injection for the treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome is a practical procedure before offering surgical treatment. It is also appropriate for the patient with significant medical problems or not willing to undergo surgical intervention. Its ultrasound guide reduces injection-related complications, improves patient satisfaction, is cost-effective, and improves patient compliance.
Collapse
|
16
|
Hsu YC, Yang FC, Hsu HH, Huang GS. Median Nerve Injury in Ultrasound-Guided Hydrodissection and Corticosteroid Injections for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN (STUTTGART, GERMANY : 1980) 2022; 43:186-193. [PMID: 32604424 DOI: 10.1055/a-1140-5717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Permanent nerve damage after corticosteroid injection has been suggested when symptoms of median nerve injury (MNI) are irreversible. We assess the outcomes of MNI and their association with ultrasonography (US)-guided hydrodissection and the following corticosteroid injection for symptomatic carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS US-guided hydrodissection and the following corticosteroid injections were administered to 126 CTS patients. Occurrence of MNI, clinical data, and post-hydrodissection findings were evaluated. Post-hydrodissection findings included vascular injury during hydrodissection, altered echogenicity, reduced flattening ratio, and increased cross-sectional area of the MN at the inlet of the carpal tunnel (MN-CSA-Inlet) on ultrasonography after hydrodissection. The relevance of MNI with respect to these clinical data and findings was determined. The outcome was rated using Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) scores. RESULTS Nine patients suffered MNI (incidence, 7.1 %) but improved significantly at follow-up. Clinical data and vascular injury during hydrodissection, altered echogenicity, and reduced flattening ratio after hydrodissection were unrelated to prolonged transient MNI (p > 0.05). MNI was significantly associated with increased CSA (p = 0.005). A CSA increase > 2 mm2 after hydrodissection yielded the greatest performance (0.979) for MNI in the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Decreases in BCTQ scores after injection did not differ significantly between groups with and without MNI (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION MNI during hydrodissection may be reversible. MNI is indicated by an increase in MN-CSA-inlet immediately after hydrodissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Chih Hsu
- Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Fu-Chi Yang
- Neurology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsian-He Hsu
- Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Guo-Shu Huang
- Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
- Medical Research, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Novel Motor-Sparing Ultrasound-Guided Neural Injection in Severe Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Comparison of Four Injectates. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 2022:9745322. [PMID: 35224104 PMCID: PMC8872692 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9745322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Nerve hydrodissection uses fluid injection under pressure to selectively separate nerves from areas of suspected entrapment; this procedure is increasingly viewed as potentially useful in treating carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The usage of normal saline (NS), 5% dextrose water (D5W), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and hyaluronic acid (HA) as primary injectates for hydrodissection without an anesthetic can limit anesthetic-related toxicity and preserve the motor functions of the median nerve. Here, we describe a novel motor-sparing neural injection and compare the effect of these four injectates for severe CTS. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 61 severe CTS cases after a single neural injection with NS, D5W, PRP, or HA. Outcomes were evaluated on the 1st and 6th months postinjection, including the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) scores and the nerve cross-sectional area (CSA). The results revealed that PRP, D5W, and HA were more efficient than NS at all measured time points (
), except for CSA at the 1st month between the NS and D5W groups. Single-injections of PRP and D5W seemed more effective than that of HA within 6 months postinjection for symptom and functional improvement (6th-month BCTQ-symptom, D5W vs. HA,
; 1st-month BCTQ-symptom, PRP vs. HA,
; 1st- and 6th-month BCTQ-function, D5W vs. HA,
and 0.016, respectively; 1st-month BCTQ-function, PRP vs. HA,
). For reducing CSA, PRP and HA seemed more effective than D5W (
on the 1st month and HA vs. D5W,
;
on the 6th month and PRP vs. D5W,
).
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Background Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), one of the most common entrapment neuropathies, can, in fact, be considered as a socio-economic issue that reduces work productivity, increases disability, and requires prolonged rehabilitation. The imaging modality of choice in CTS imaging is the ultrasound (US), as several morphological parameters can be used in CTS diagnosis and follow-up. In recent years, US-guided CTS injection therapy has become an established treatment option for mild to moderate CTS. The authors of this review performed a literature search that revealed several differences in US-guided carpal tunnel injection in an attempt to unify individual stages of CTS injections protocol for future guidance: patient preparation, injection approach, needle positioning, injected medications, and injectate volume. The three approaches to carpal tunnel injections described in the literature, that is, the ulnar, radial, and longitudinal, can be implemented with single or multiple deposits and different injection volumes. Medications used for injections are corticosteroids, local anaesthetics, dextrose, saline, platelet-rich plasma, and progesterone. Conclusions Although no consensus has yet been reached as to which protocol should be used, the ulnar approach with a single deposit injected in large volumes should be considered as the first choice, while dextrose should be the first-line medication option. Furthermore, as terminological differences make it difficult to draw a uniform comparison the presented steps for US-guided carpal tunnel injection might serve as a guideline for future studies.
Collapse
|
19
|
Celenlioglu AE, Unal-Artık HA, Guler G. Comparison of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency versus steroid injection in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Ir J Med Sci 2022; 191:2751-2757. [PMID: 35129753 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-022-02923-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most widespread form of nerve entrapment neuropathy results from increase compression pressure of the median nerve at the wrist under the transverse carpal ligament. AIMS To compare ultrasound (US)-guided median nerve steroid injection and pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) on pain intensity, functional status, and patient satisfaction in the treatment of CTS. METHODS A total of 90 hands of 59 patients who underwent steroid injection at the level of proximal carpal tunnel or PRF for CTS were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were recorded. The pain severity was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and the functional status and clinical outcomes were assessed using the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) before the procedure and at Week 1, Month 1, and Month 3 after the procedure. Time to pain relief was evaluated at week 1. Patient satisfaction was evaluated at Month 3. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the NRS and BCTQ scores between the two treatment methods (p > 0.05 for both). In addition, a significant decrease in the NRS and BCTQ scores were detected at all follow-ups compared to baseline in treatment groups (p < 0.001). The mean time to pain relief was significantly shorter in the PRF group (p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was similar at Month 3 between the treatment methods (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Our study results suggest that both US-guided steroid injection to the median nerve and PRF are effective and safe methods in the short-term in the treatment of CTS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alp Eren Celenlioglu
- Department of Pain Medicine, Health Sciences University Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, General Dr. Tevfik Sağlam Cd. No. 1, 06010, Etlik, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Hanzade Aybuke Unal-Artık
- Department of Pain Medicine, Usak University Training and Research Hospital, Fevzi Çakmak, Gazi Blv. Yanyolu No. 50, 64300, Usak, Merkez, Turkey
| | - Gulen Guler
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Division of Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Köşk Mah. Prof. Dr. Turhan Feyzioğlu Cad. No. 42, 38039, Melikgazi, Kayseri, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bosch P, Carubbi F, Scirè CA, Baraliakos X, Falzon L, Dejaco C, Machado PM. Value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider. RMD Open 2021; 7:rmdopen-2021-001864. [PMID: 34810228 PMCID: PMC8609947 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To summarise current data on the value of imaging to guide interventional procedures in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease (RMDs) informing an European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology taskforce. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted to retrieve prospective and retrospective studies published in English and comparing different (imaging) techniques, different settings and procedural protocols to guide interventions in patients with RMDs. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Epistemonikos databases were searched through October 2021. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB tool for randomised trials V.2 (ROB2), the RoB tool for Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions and the appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies. RESULTS Sixty-six studies were included (most with moderate/high RoB); 49 were randomised controlled trials, three prospective cohort studies and 14 retrospective studies. Fifty-one studies compared either one imaging technique with another imaging technique, or with palpation-guided interventions. Ultrasound (US) was most frequently studied (49/51), followed by fluoroscopy (10/51). Higher accuracy was found for US or fluoroscopy compared with palpation-guided interventions. Studies comparing different imaging techniques (12/51) did not endorse one specific method. Different settings/equipment for imaging-guided procedures (eg, automatic vs manual syringes) were investigated in three studies, reporting heterogeneous results. Fifteen studies compared different imaging-guided procedures (eg, intra-articular vs periarticular injections). CONCLUSION Higher accuracy of needle positioning at joints and periarticular structures was seen in most studies when using imaging (especially US) guidance as compared with palpation-guided interventions with the limitation of heterogeneity of data and considerable RoB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Bosch
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Francesco Carubbi
- Internal Medicine and Nephrology Unit, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.,Department of Medicine, ASL 1 Avezzano-Sulmona-L'Aquila, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Christian Dejaco
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria .,Rheumatology Service, Hospital of Bruneck, Bruneck, Italy
| | - Pedro M Machado
- Centre for Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK.,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Rheumatology, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Efficacy of 5% Dextrose Water Injection for Peripheral Entrapment Neuropathy: A Narrative Review. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms222212358. [PMID: 34830240 PMCID: PMC8621462 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222212358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Current non-surgical treatment for peripheral entrapment neuropathy is considered insignificant and unsustainable; thus, it is essential to find an alternative novel treatment. The technique of perineural injection therapy using 5% dextrose water has been progressively used to treat many peripheral entrapment neuropathies and has been proven to have outstanding effects in a few high-quality studies. Currently, the twentieth edition of Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine textbook recommends this novel injection therapy as an alternative local treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Hence, this novel approach has become the mainstream method for treating CTS, and other studies have revealed its clinical benefit for other peripheral entrapment neuropathies. In this narrative review, we aimed to provide an insight into this treatment method and summarize the current studies on cases of peripheral entrapment neuropathy treated by this method.
Collapse
|
22
|
Wang JC, Hsu PC, Wang KA, Chang KV. Ultrasound-Guided Triamcinolone Acetonide Hydrodissection for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:742724. [PMID: 34589506 PMCID: PMC8475784 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.742724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Despite the wide use of corticosteroid hydrodissection for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), there is insufficient evidence to confirm its efficacy. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of corticosteroid hydrodissection vs. corticosteroid perineural injection alone on clinical and electrophysiological parameters in patients with CTS. Method: This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in a tertiary care center with a follow-up period of 12 weeks. Subjects were randomly assigned to either ultrasound-guided hydrodissection with a mixture of 1 mL of triamcinolone acetonide (10 mg/mL), 1 mL of 2% lidocaine, and 8 mL normal saline or ultrasound-guided perineural injection with 1 mL of triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/mL) and 1 mL of 2% lidocaine. The primary outcome measure was the symptom severity subscale (SSS) of Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) scores at baseline and at 6 and 12 weeks' post-treatment. The secondary outcomes included the functional status subscale (FSS) of BCTQ and the distal motor latency and sensory nerve conduction velocity of the median nerve. The effect of interventions on the designated outcome was analyzed using a 3 × 2 repeated measures analysis of variance. The within-subject and among-subject factors were differences in time (before the intervention, and 6 and 12 weeks after injection) and intervention types (with or without hydrodissection), respectively. Results: Sixty-four patients diagnosed with CTS were enrolled. Both groups experienced improvement in the SSS and FSS of BCTQ and median nerve distal motor latency and sensory nerve conduction velocity. However, group-by-time interactions were not significant in any outcome measurements. No serious adverse events were reported in either group, except for two patients in the hydrodissection group who reported minor post-injection pain on the first day after the intervention, which resolved spontaneously without the need for additional treatments. Conclusion: Hydrodissection did not provide an additional benefit compared to corticosteroid perineural injection alone. More prospective studies are needed to investigate the long-term effectiveness of corticosteroid hydrodissection, as well as its influence on median nerve mobility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Chi Wang
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Po-Cheng Hsu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kevin A Wang
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shin-Kong Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Ke-Vin Chang
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Community and Geriatric Research Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Bei-Hu Branch and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Center for Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Wang-Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Diagnosis and Simultaneous Treatment of Musculoskeletal Injury Using H 2O 2-Triggered Echogenic Antioxidant Polymer Nanoparticles in a Rat Model of Contusion Injury. NANOMATERIALS 2021; 11:nano11102571. [PMID: 34685012 PMCID: PMC8537538 DOI: 10.3390/nano11102571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Ultrasound is clinically used for diagnosis and interventions for musculoskeletal injuries like muscle contusion, but contrast of ultrasonography still remains a challenge in the field of the musculoskeletal system. A level of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is known to be elevated during mechanical tissue damage and therefore H2O2 can be exploited as a diagnostic and therapeutic marker for mechanical injuries in the musculoskeletal system. We previously developed poly(vanillin-oxalate) (PVO) as an inflammation-responsive polymeric prodrug of vanillin, which is designed to rapidly respond to H2O2 and exert antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. The primary aim of this study is to verify whether PVO nanoparticles could serve as contrast agents as well as therapeutic agents for musculoskeletal injuries simultaneously. In a rat model of contusion-induced muscle injury, PVO nanoparticles generated CO2 bubbles to enhance the ultrasound contrast in the injury site. A single intramuscular injection of PVO nanoparticles also suppressed contusion-induced muscle damages by inhibiting the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and inflammatory cell infiltration. We, therefore, anticipate that PVO nanoparticles have great translational potential as not only ultrasound imaging agents but also therapeutic agents for the musculoskeletal disorders such as contusion.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite previous studies demonstrating the benefit of office-based ultrasonography for musculoskeletal evaluation, many hand surgery clinics have yet to adopt this practice. The authors conducted a cost-benefit analysis of establishing an ultrasound machine in a hand clinic. METHODS The authors used the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary, and Physician Compare National Downloadable File databases to estimate provider reimbursement and annual frequency of office-based upper extremity-related ultrasound procedures. Ultrasound machine cost, maintenance fees, and consumable supply prices were gleaned from the literature. The primary outcomes were net cost-benefit difference and benefit-cost ratio at 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years after implementation. Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying factors that influence the net cost-benefit difference. RESULTS The estimated total initial expense to establish ultrasonography in the clinic was $53,985. The overall cost-benefit difference was -$49,530 per practice at the end of the first year (benefit-cost ratio, 0.3), -$1049 after 5 years (benefit-cost ratio, 1.0), and $52,022 after 10 years (benefit-cost ratio, 1.4). Benefits primarily accrued because of physician reimbursements. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed machine price, annual procedure volume, and reimbursement rate as the most influential parameters in determining the benefit-cost ratio. Ultrasonography was cost beneficial when the machine price was less than $46,000 or if the billing frequency exceeded six times per week. A societal perspective analysis demonstrated a large net benefit of $218,162 after 5 years. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of office-based ultrasound imaging can result in a positive financial return on investment. Ultrasound machine cost and procedural volume were the most critical factors influencing benefit-cost ratio.
Collapse
|
25
|
Wang H, Zhu Y, Wei H, Dong C. Ultrasound-guided local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil 2021; 35:1506-1517. [PMID: 34096345 DOI: 10.1177/02692155211014702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided (US-guided) versus landmark-guided (LM-guided) local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS Database including Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The outcomes mainly included Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ): Symptom Severity Scale (BCTQs), Functional Status Scale (BCTQf); and electrophysiological indexes: distal motor latency (DML), sensory distal latency (SDL), compound muscle action potential (CAMP), sensory nerve action potential amplitude (SNAP), and sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV). Adverse events were also recorded. RESULTS Overall, nine RCTs were finally screened out with 469 patients (596 injected hands). Pooled analysis showed that US-guided injection was more effective in BCTQs (SMD, -0.69; 95% CI, -1.08 to -0.31; P = 0.0005), BCTQf (SMD, -0.23; 95% CI, -0.39 to -0.07; P = 0.005), CAMP (MD, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.35-0.94; P < 0.0001) improvement, and a lower rate of adverse events (RR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.22-0.52; P < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis revealed that the US-guided injection had significantly better CMAP than the LM-guided for the in-plane approach (MD, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.36-1.01; P < 0.0001) but not for the out-plane approach (MD, 0.39; 95% CI, -0.39 to 1.17; P = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS US-guided injection was superior to LM-guided injection in symptom severity, functional status, electrodiagnostic, and adverse events improvement for CTS. To some extent, the in-plane approach yields better results compared with the out-plane process under US guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongchen Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beijing Daxing District Hospital of Integrative Chinese and Western Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Yuting Zhu
- Beijing Tongzhou Integrative Medicine Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hongyu Wei
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chunke Dong
- Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep 2021; 11:10417. [PMID: 34001949 PMCID: PMC8128919 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89898-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) refers to the symptoms and signs caused by the compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel. It can be treated by corticosteroid injection into the carpal tunnel. Two methods for injection have been employed, namely ultrasound-guided and landmark-guided injection. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare these methods in terms of several outcomes. A search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases was performed from the date of their inception to October 7, 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results for continuous variables are expressed as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 software. The analysis included eight RCTs published between 2013 and 2019 with a total of 448 patients. Ultrasound-guided injection yielded more favorable results than landmark-guided injection for the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire, Symptom Severity Scale [SMD = − 0.43, 95% CI (− 0.68, − 0.19), P = 0.0005] and Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire, Functional Status Scale [SMD = − 0.50, 95% CI (− 0.84, − 0.15), P = 0.005]. Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection is recommended for patients with CTS.
Collapse
|
27
|
de Moraes VY, Queiroz J, Raduan-Neto J, Fernandes M, Okamura A, Belloti JC. Nonsurgical Treatment for Symptomatic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Local Corticosteroid Injection Versus Night Orthosis. J Hand Surg Am 2021; 46:295-300.e1. [PMID: 33814051 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2019] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE For carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), local corticosteroid injection (corticosteroid), and/or wrist immobilization with night orthosis (orthosis) are commonly prescribed and are supported by strong evidence. The aim of this study was to compare orthosis versus corticosteroid for patients with CTS. METHODS A CTS diagnosis was made clinically and supported by electrodiagnostic study. Patients were randomly allocated to either orthosis or corticosteroid. Clinical assessments were performed before the intervention, within the first week of the intervention, and 1, 3, and 6 months after the intervention. Primary outcomes were improvement in nocturnal paresthesia and Boston-Levine questionnaire (BLQ) score. Secondary outcomes were pain assessed by visual analog scale and complications. RESULTS Of 100 patients enrolled in the study, 95 completed the planned follow-up (45 in the orthosis arm and 50 in the corticosteroid arm). Corticosteroid injections were superior to orthosis in remission of nocturnal paresthesia (remission rates at 1 month, 84.6% versus 43.83%; 3 months, 71.1% versus 40.4%; and 6 months, 80.3% versus 28.8%). The BLQ scores (functional and symptom subscales) were also more favorable for corticosteroid at 1, 3, and 6 months (minimal clinically important differences for Function > 0.5 and Symptom > 0.16). Pain scores were lower and favored the corticosteroid group. There were no complications in either group. CONCLUSIONS Both options are effective in the short term. Corticosteroid is superior to orthosis for improving CTS-related nocturnal paresthesia, BLQ scores, and pain. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinícius Ynoe de Moraes
- Hand Surgery Division, Hospital Alvorada Moema-United Health, São Paulo/SP, Brazil; Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
| | - Jesus Queiroz
- Hand Surgery Division, Hospital Alvorada Moema-United Health, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Jorge Raduan-Neto
- Hand Surgery Division, Hospital Alvorada Moema-United Health, São Paulo/SP, Brazil; Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Marcela Fernandes
- Hand Surgery Division, Hospital Alvorada Moema-United Health, São Paulo/SP, Brazil; Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - Aldo Okamura
- Hand Surgery Division, Hospital Alvorada Moema-United Health, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| | - João Carlos Belloti
- Hand Surgery Division, Hospital Alvorada Moema-United Health, São Paulo/SP, Brazil; Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo/SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mezian K, SobotovÁ K, Kuliha M, Chang KV, CeÉ J, AngerovÁ Y, ÖzÇakar L. Ultrasound-guided perineural vs. peritendinous corticosteroid injections in carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2021; 57:775-782. [PMID: 33733720 DOI: 10.23736/s1973-9087.21.06682-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Corticosteroid injections are proven to be effective in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS); however, the optimal injection site still remains unclear. AIM To compare the efficacy of perineural vs. peritendinous target sites for corticosteroid injection in CTS. DESIGN A Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Trial. SETTING Outpatients, tertiary care center. POPULATION Forty-six patients were equally randomized into two intervention groups as Group A (18 F and 5 M, mean age;50.0 ± 15.9 years, mean symptom duration;5.9 ± 3.3 months) and Group B (19 F, 4 M patients, mean age;54.3 ± 15.0 years, mean symptom duration;5.9 ± 4.7 months). METHODS Methylprednisolone acetate (40 mg) and 1 mL of 1% trimecaine hydrochloride was injected next to the median nerve (Group A) or among flexor tendons away from the nerve (Group B) under ultrasound (US) guidance. The visual analogue scale was used as the primary outcome measure, and the symptom severity scale and functional status scale of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire were used as the secondary subjective outcome measures. Twopoint discrimination, grip strength, cross-sectional area, and distal motor latency were assessed as objective outcome measures. The data were collected at baseline and at 2, 6 and 12 weeks after the injection. RESULTS Both groups showed improvement in subjective and objective measures at 2 weeks following the injection - also maintained up to 12 weeks during the follow-up (p<0.05). However, no difference was observed between the two groups (p<0.05). No serious adverse effects were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS Both intervention techniques seem to be effective and safe in the conservative treatment of CTS. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT Based on this study results, it might be noteworthy that physicians can opt for perineural or peritendinous injections without compromising the treatment efficacy and safety. Herewith, US guidance is, for sure, necessary for performing safe and accurate injections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamal Mezian
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic -
| | - Karolína SobotovÁ
- Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Ke-Vin Chang
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan. 5 Department of Neurosurgery, J. E. Purkyně University, Masaryk Hospital, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic
| | - Jiří CeÉ
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yvona AngerovÁ
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
One-Year Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Moderate-to-Severe Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2021; 102:951-958. [PMID: 33548206 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 12/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the therapeutic effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for moderate-to-severe carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). DESIGN A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial (1-year follow-up). SETTING Outpatient of local medical center settings. PARTICIPANTS Patients (N=26) who were diagnosed with bilateral moderate-to-severe CTS (total 52 wrists) were included. For each patient, one wrist was randomized into either the PRP or control group and the contralateral wrist of the same patient was allocated to another group. Twenty-four patients were included in the final data analysis. INTERVENTIONS The wrists in the PRP group received a single ultrasound-guided dose of PRP injection (3.5mL), and the control group received a single ultrasound-guided injection with normal saline (3.5mL). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) scores were used as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes encompassed the cross-sectional area of the median nerve and electrophysiological study. Assessments were conducted prior to injection and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postinjection. RESULTS Compared to the control group, the PRP group exhibited significant improvements in BCTQ severity scores at all time points, BCTQ functional scores at the sixth month, and cross-sectional area at the 12th month postinjection (P<.0125). CONCLUSIONS A single dose of ultrasound-guided perineural PRP injection can provide therapeutic effect for 1 year postinjection.
Collapse
|
30
|
Chen SR, Ho TY, Shen YP, Li TY, Su YC, Lam KHS, Chen LC, Wu YT. Comparison of short- and long-axis nerve hydrodissection for carpal tunnel syndrome: A prospective randomized, single-blind trial. Int J Med Sci 2021; 18:3488-3497. [PMID: 34522175 PMCID: PMC8436111 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.63815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: This study is to compare the efficacy of short-axis hydrodissection with long-axis hydrodissection for patients with mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods: Forty-seven patients with mild-to-moderate CTS were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial (6 months follow-up). With ultrasound guidance, patients in both groups (short-axis or long-axis groups) were injected with normal saline (5 mL per session). Assessments were performed before and 2 weeks after the injection, as well as at 1, 3, and 6 months post-intervention. The primary outcome measure was the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) score and secondary outcomes included the cross-sectional area of the median nerve and electrophysiological studies. Results: Forty-four patients (21 wrists in the short-axis group and 23 wrists in the long-axis group) completed the study. Compared with the baseline, both groups showed improved BCTQ and cross-sectional area at all follow-up assessments (p<0.05). The short-axis group was not more effective except significant improvements in BCTQ-severity and BCTQ-function 1 month post-injection compared to the long-axis group (p = 0.031 and p = 0.023, respectively). Conclusions: Both short- and long-axis hydrodissection were effective for patients with mild-to-moderate CTS and the short-axis approach was not more effective than long-axis injection. Further studies with larger sample sizes, multiple injections, and larger injection volume are encouraged in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si-Ru Chen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, No. 325, Sec. 2, Cheng-Kung Road, Neihu District, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Tsung-Yen Ho
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, No. 325, Sec. 2, Cheng-Kung Road, Neihu District, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taichung Armed Forces General Hospital, No. 348, Sec. 2, Chungshan Road, Taiping District, Taichung City, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Yu-Ping Shen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, No. 325, Sec. 2, Cheng-Kung Road, Neihu District, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Tsung-Ying Li
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, No. 325, Sec. 2, Cheng-Kung Road, Neihu District, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.,Integrated Pain Management Center, Tri-Service General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, No. 325, Sec. 2, Cheng-Kung Road, Neihu District, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Yu-Chi Su
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, No. 325, Sec. 2, Cheng-Kung Road, Neihu District, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - King Hei Stanley Lam
- The Hong Kong Institute of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Hong Kong.,Department of Family Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.,Department of Family Medicine, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Liang-Cheng Chen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, No. 325, Sec. 2, Cheng-Kung Road, Neihu District, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Yung-Tsan Wu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tri-Service General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, No. 325, Sec. 2, Cheng-Kung Road, Neihu District, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.,Integrated Pain Management Center, Tri-Service General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, No. 325, Sec. 2, Cheng-Kung Road, Neihu District, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hsu PC, Liao KK, Lin KP, Chiu JW, Wu PY, Chou CL, Wang NY, Wang JC. Comparison of Corticosteroid Injection Dosages in Mild to Moderate Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2020; 101:1857-1864. [PMID: 32682938 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate whether the therapeutic effect of ultrasound-guided injections with 10 mg or 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide (TA) was dose-dependent in patients with idiopathic mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). DESIGN Prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study with 12 weeks of follow-up. SETTING Rehabilitation outpatient clinic of a single medical center. PARTICIPANTS Patients with CTS (N=56). INTERVENTION Participants were randomly assigned to 2 treatment groups for injection: (A) 40 mg TA+2% lidocaine hydrochloride or (B) 10 mg TA+2% lidocaine hydrochloride. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Participants were evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ, including Symptom Severity Scale [SSS] and Functional Status Scale [FSS]) at baseline and 6 and 12 weeks after injection). Nerve conduction studies, including parameters of distal motor latency, amplitude of compound motor action potential, amplitude of sensory nerve action potential and sensory nerve conduction velocity of median nerve, and the patient's subjective impression of improvement, were recorded before injection and 6 and 12 weeks after injection. RESULTS No significant differences were observed in baseline demographic characteristics and clinical evaluations. The parameters in group A and B at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks were (1) SSS: 2.17±0.14, 1.19±0.04, and 1.34±0.09 and 1.87±0.11, 1.21±0.07, and 1.26±0.04; (2) FSS: 1.63±0.07, 1.27±0.06, and 1.33±0.08 and 1.50±0.10, 1.18±0.05, and 1.26±0.05; (3) VAS: 6.4±0.3, 2.2±0.3, and 3.0±0.1 and 6.7±0.3, 2.0±0.3, and 3.1±0.3, respectively, and significantly decreased after 6 and 12 weeks in both treatment groups (P<.05). All parameters of nerve conduction studies improved in both groups after 12 weeks (P<.05). VAS, BCTQ, and nerve conduction studies did not show significant intergroup differences after 6 and 12 weeks. CONCLUSION In patients with idiopathic mild to moderate CTS, ultrasound-guided injection with 10 and 40 mg TA yield similar improvements in BCTQ, VAS, and nerve conduction studies at the 12-week follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po-Cheng Hsu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Bei-Hu Branch, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kwong-Kum Liao
- Department of Neurology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kon-Ping Lin
- Department of Neurology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jan-Wei Chiu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pin-Yi Wu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Liang Chou
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Nin-Yi Wang
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jia-Chi Wang
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Babaei-Ghazani A, Forogh B, Raissi GR, Ahadi T, Eftekharsadat B, Yousefi N, Rahimi-Dehgolan S, Moradi K. Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Injection in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Comparison Between Radial and Ulnar Approaches. J Pain Res 2020; 13:1569-1578. [PMID: 32617017 PMCID: PMC7326201 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s248600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare two common approaches for ultrasonography (US)-guided injection. Patients and Methods Sixty patients with mild-to-moderate CTS were included in this double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT). They received a single shot of corticosteroid injection through either the US-guided in-plane approach: radial or ulnar side. Participants were evaluated using Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, as well as electrodiagnosis (EDX) and US parameters before the intervention, and within 12 weeks of follow-up. Results In both groups, all outcomes, except for the electrodiagnostic measures, significantly improved within the follow-up. Pain-VAS and both subscales of BCTQ questionnaire, as our main subjective outcomes, revealed dramatic improvement, with the largest amount of changes in VAS (70%; comparing to baseline value), and about 37% for both of BQSS and BQFS scales, all indicating superiority of radial to ulnar in-plane approach. During the first follow-up, we did not detect any remarkable preference between the groups in either subjective or electrodiagnostic variables. However, there was a significant difference at next follow-up time-points in terms of VAS for pain and BQFS favoring radial approach (Table 3). Furthermore, US-measured parameters including nerve-circumference and CSA improved only in the radial in-plane group. Conclusion The current data proved that radial in-plane approach for CTS injection could be at least as effective as the more common ulnar in-plane method. Even the pain-relief effect was longer for the radial in-plane approach. Also, patients’ functional status and objective variables all revealed better outcomes via the new approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Babaei-Ghazani
- Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Bijan Forogh
- Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Gholam Reza Raissi
- Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Tannaz Ahadi
- Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Bina Eftekharsadat
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Naseh Yousefi
- Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Shahram Rahimi-Dehgolan
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, IKHC Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Katayoun Moradi
- Neuromusculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sconfienza LM, Adriaensen M, Albano D, Allen G, Aparisi Gómez MP, Bazzocchi A, Beggs I, Bignotti B, Chianca V, Corazza A, Dalili D, De Dea M, Del Cura JL, Di Pietto F, Drakonaki E, Facal de Castro F, Filippiadis D, Gielen J, Gitto S, Gupta H, Klauser AS, Lalam R, Martin S, Martinoli C, Mauri G, McCarthy C, McNally E, Melaki K, Messina C, Mirón Mombiela R, Neubauer B, Obradov M, Olchowy C, Orlandi D, Gonzalez RP, Rutkauskas S, Snoj Z, Tagliafico AS, Talaska A, Vasilevska-Nikodinovska V, Vucetic J, Wilson D, Zaottini F, Zappia M, Plagou A. Clinical indications for image guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)-part III, nerves of the upper limb. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:1498-1506. [PMID: 31712960 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06479-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Revised: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Image-guided interventional procedures of the nerves are commonly performed by physicians from different medical specialties, although there is a lack of clinical indications for these types of procedures. This Delphi-based consensus provided a list of indications on image-guided interventional procedures for nerves of the upper limb based on updated published evidence. METHODS An expert panel of 45 members of the Ultrasound and Interventional Subcommittees of the ESSR participated in this Delphi-based consensus study. After revision of the published papers on image-guided interventional procedures for nerves of the upper limb updated to September 2018, the experts drafted a list of statements according to the Oxford Centre for evidence-based medicine levels of evidence. Consensus on statements regarding clinical indications was considered as strong when more than 95% of experts agreed, and broad if more than 80% agreed. RESULTS Ten statements were drafted on procedures for nerves of the upper limb. Only two statements reached the highest level of evidence (ultrasound guidance is a safe and effective method for brachial plexus block; ultrasound-guided non-surgical approaches are safe and effective methods to treat carpal tunnel syndrome in the short term, but there is sparse evidence on the mid- and long-term effectiveness of these interventions). Strong consensus was obtained on 6/10 statements (60%), while 4/10 statements reached broad consensus (40%). CONCLUSIONS This Delphi-based consensus study reported poor evidence on image-guided interventional procedures for nerves of the upper limb. Sixty percent of statements on clinical indications provided by the expert board reached a strong consensus. KEY POINTS • An expert panel of the ESSR provided 10 evidence-based statements on clinical indications for image-guided interventional procedures for nerves of the upper limb • Two statements reached the highest level of evidence • Strong consensus was obtained on 6/10 statements (60%), while 4/10 statements reached broad consensus (40%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Maria Sconfienza
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161, Milano, Italy.
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy.
| | - Miraude Adriaensen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, Heerlen, Brunssum, Kerkrade, The Netherlands
| | - Domenico Albano
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161, Milano, Italy
- Sezione di Scienze Radiologiche, Dipartimento di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze e Diagnostica Avanzata, Università degli Studi di Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Georgina Allen
- St Luke's Radiology Oxford Ltd, Oxford, UK
- University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez
- Department of Radiology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, 1023, New Zealand
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Vithas Nueve de Octubre, 46015, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alberto Bazzocchi
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ian Beggs
- Department of Radiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Vito Chianca
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161, Milano, Italy
| | - Angelo Corazza
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161, Milano, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Danoob Dalili
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- The Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | - Miriam De Dea
- UOC Radiologia, Ospedale di Feltre, AULSS1 Dolomiti, Veneto, Italy
| | - Jose Luis Del Cura
- Department of Radiology, Donostia University Hospital, 20014, Donostia/San Sebastian, Spain
- University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Spain
| | - Francesco Di Pietto
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, (CE), Italy
| | - Eleni Drakonaki
- Private Institution of Ultrasonography and MSK Radiology, Heraklion, Greece
- Department of Anatomy, Medical School of the European University of Cyprus, Engomi, Cyprus
| | - Fernando Facal de Castro
- IBERORAD 1895 S.L., 08021, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Radiology, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Dimitrios Filippiadis
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital "ATTIKON" Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Jan Gielen
- University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- University of Antwerp Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium
| | | | | | - Andrea S Klauser
- Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Radiology, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Radhesh Lalam
- The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Gobowen, Oswestry, UK
| | - Silvia Martin
- Hospital Son Llatzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Universidad de las Islas Baleares Medicine, Palma, Balearic Islands, Spain
| | - Carlo Martinoli
- Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
- University of Genoa - DISSAL Department of Health Sciences, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mauri
- Division of Interventional Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Catherine McCarthy
- The Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Musculoskeletal Radiology, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Kalliopi Melaki
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmelo Messina
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161, Milano, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Rebeca Mirón Mombiela
- Department of Physiology, Universidad de Valencia/INCLIVA, 46010, Valencia, Spain
- Herlev og Gentofte Hospital Radiologisk Afdeling, Herlev Ringvej 75, opgang 51, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Benedikt Neubauer
- Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Marina Obradov
- Sint Maartenskliniek, 9011, Nijmegen, 6500GM, The Netherlands
| | - Cyprian Olchowy
- Department of Oral Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | | | | | - Saulius Rutkauskas
- Radiology Department, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Ziga Snoj
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška 7, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia
| | - Alberto Stefano Tagliafico
- Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Violeta Vasilevska-Nikodinovska
- Medical Faculty, University "Ss.Cyril and Methodius", Skopje, North Macedonia
- University Surgical Clinic "St.Naum Ohridski", Skopje, North Macedonia
| | - Jelena Vucetic
- Department of Radiology, General University Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Department of Physiology, Universidad de Valencia/INCLIVA, 46010, Valencia, Spain
| | - David Wilson
- St Luke's Radiology Oxford Ltd, Oxford, UK
- University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Federico Zaottini
- University of Genoa - DISSAL Department of Health Sciences, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marcello Zappia
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
- Varelli Institute, Naples, Italy
| | - Athena Plagou
- Department of Radiology, Private Institution of Ultrasonography, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Zhou J, Xue Y. Comparing the Efficacy of Local Triamcinolone Injection in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Three Different Approaches with or without Ultrasound Guidance [Letter]. J Pain Res 2020; 12:3467-3468. [PMID: 31920370 PMCID: PMC6935277 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s238017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaming Zhou
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuan Xue
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wu YY, He FD, Chen K, Quan JR, Guo XY. Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection with and without needle release of the A1 pulley in treating trigger finger. JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 2020; 28:573-581. [PMID: 32116288 DOI: 10.3233/xst-190620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical effectiveness of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection with and without needle release of the A1 pulley in treating trigger finger. METHODS A total of 60 patients with trigger finger were enrolled in this retrospective study. Among them, 30 patients were treated with ultrasound-guided needle release of the A1 pulley with corticosteroid injection (group A) and 30 patients were treated with single ultrasound-guided corticosteroids injection (group B). The following parameters were evaluated including clinical parameters (pain degree, function of joint, finger tendon function, postoperative satisfaction), and ultrasound parameter (thickness of A1 pulley). RESULTS The postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) and Quinnell scores in two groups were significantly lower than that before operation (p < 0.05). The postoperative Quinnell score of group A was significantly lower than that in group B (p < 0.05). The TAM results showed that the postoperative overall excellent and good rate of group A was significantly higher than that in group B (p < 0.05). The postoperative survey showed that more than 80% patients reported satisfaction in the two groups. The ultrasound imaging results showed that the postoperative thickness of A1 pulley in two groups were thinner than that before operation (p < 0.05). There were no adverse effects and complications in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Both approaches had treatment benefit in trigger finger. Ultrasound-guided needle release of the A1 pulley with corticosteroid injection had better treatment benefits than single ultrasound-guided corticosteroids injection in improving finger tendon function and joint function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan-Yan Wu
- Department of Ultrasonic, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincal People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Fan-Ding He
- Department of Ultrasonic, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincal People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Kai Chen
- Department of Ultrasonic, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincal People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Jie-Rong Quan
- Department of Ultrasonic, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincal People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Xuan-Yan Guo
- Department of Ultrasonic, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincal People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Rayegani SM, Raeissadat SA, Ahmadi-Dastgerdi M, Bavaghar N, Rahimi-Dehgolan S. Comparing The Efficacy Of Local Triamcinolone Injection In Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Three Different Approaches with or without Ultrasound Guidance. J Pain Res 2019; 12:2951-2958. [PMID: 31749629 PMCID: PMC6817831 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s212948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The present article has investigated the added value of ultrasound (US) guidance on improving the efficacy of local triamcinolone injection via comparing two US-guided methods versus a conventional landmark-guided approach. Methods Eighty-one subjects with mild or moderate CTS were included and randomly assigned into three categories including landmark-guided, conventional US-guided midline approach and US-guided ulnar in-plane method. Primarily, participants in the three groups were relatively similar in terms of demographics and their clinical variables comprising visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, pain-free grip strength (PFGS), Boston CTS questionnaire (BCTQ), EDX parameters, and cross-sectional area (CSA) of median nerve measured by ultrasonography. Ten weeks after injection, the changes of clinical and para-clinical outcomes were reassessed for 76 patients who finished the study. Results Our findings showed that all three injection methods were associated with a significant and relatively similar improvement in clinical and electrodiagnostic parameters. The post-injection evaluation showed a statistically significant change in all variables except for symptom severity score (SSS) of BCTQ. The best effect-size values were observed for VAS [56%] and functional severity scale (FSS) of BCTQ [42%], both reported in the US-guided midline group. However, no significant difference was found between the groups regarding their improvement in any of the outcome variables (P value >0.05). Conclusion Based on the current data, all three injection methods were effective in improving electrodiagnostic findings and clinical symptoms of CTS. Although all approaches were relatively similar, US-guided midline approach was associated with slightly better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed Mansoor Rayegani
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Shohada-E-Tajrish Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Ahmad Raeissadat
- Clinical Development Research Center of Shahid Modarres Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department and Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Ahmadi-Dastgerdi
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Shohada-E-Tajrish Medical Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nafise Bavaghar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical and Research, Iran University of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shahram Rahimi-Dehgolan
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, IKHC Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), School of Medicine, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ertem DH, Sirin TC, Yilmaz I. Electrophysiological responsiveness and clinical outcomes of local corticosteroid injection in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2019; 77:638-645. [PMID: 31553394 DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x20190106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common mononeuropathy caused by entrapment of the median nerve at the wrist. Common treatment options for CTS include oral analgesics, splinting, hand therapy, local injections with steroids or surgery. OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to assess the short-term clinical and electrophysiological outcomes of local corticosteroid injection (LCI) in patients with symptomatic CTS. METHODS Electrophysiological parameters were evaluated before and three months after LCI. Moreover, the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Boston Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) and the Functional Status Scale (FSS) were administered before and after the injection. A mixture of 1 mL (40 mg) of methylprednisolone and 1 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine were injected blindly on the volar side of the forearm between the tendons of the radial carpal flexor muscle and long palmar muscle. RESULTS A total of 25 patients (45 hands) were enrolled in the study. Twenty women and five men with a mean age of 49.28 ± 11.37 years were included. A statistically significant difference was noted for improvement of sensory conduction velocities, sensory peak latency, and motor distal latency (p = 0.001) after LCI. A significant difference was recorded between pre- and post-injection for NRS, SSS and FSS scores (p = 0.000). CONCLUSION Local corticosteroid injection for CTS provides a short-term improvement in neurophysiological and clinical outcomes such as pain intensity, symptom severity and functional ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devrimsel Harika Ertem
- University of Health Sciences, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Research and Training Hospital, Department of Neurology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tuba Cerrahoglu Sirin
- University of Health Sciences, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Research and Training Hospital, Department of Neurology, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ilhan Yilmaz
- University of Health Sciences, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Research and Training Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Norbury JW, Nazarian LN. Ultrasound‐guided treatment of peripheral entrapment mononeuropathies. Muscle Nerve 2019; 60:222-231. [DOI: 10.1002/mus.26517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- John W. Norbury
- Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationThe Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University 600 Moye Boulevard, Greenville North Carolina 27834 USA
| | - Levon N. Nazarian
- Department of RadiologySidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Roh YH, Hwangbo K, Gong HS, Baek GH. Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Versus Landmark-Based Corticosteroid Injection for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized Trial. J Hand Surg Am 2019; 44:304-310. [PMID: 30947825 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2018] [Revised: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although a local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is frequently performed by palpation using anatomical landmarks, ultrasound (US) allows physicians to visualize and confirm placement of the injectate close to the median nerve, possibly improving the efficacy of the injection. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and complications of US-guided steroid injections with landmark-based injections for CTS. METHODS A total of 102 patients with CTS were randomized into 2 groups: landmark-based injection and US-guided injection. The response to treatment, including grip strength and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaires (BCTQ) was assessed at baseline and at 4, 12, and 24 weeks after the injection. RESULTS The BCTQ symptom and function scores were similar in the 2 groups throughout the 24-week follow-up period, with the exception of significantly lower (better) symptom scores at 4-week follow-up in the US-guided injection group. The grip strength was similar in the 2 groups throughout the 24-week follow-up period. After 24 weeks, 12 patients (24%) in the landmark-based injection group and 9 patients (18%) in the US-guided injection group had undergone carpal tunnel surgery. Symptoms of median nerve irritation were more likely to occur in patients with landmark-based injections (14%) than in those with US-guided injection (2%). CONCLUSIONS A US-guided steroid injection for CTS produces pain and functional results similar to those of landmark-based injection. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Hak Roh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University Medical Center, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Kwon Hwangbo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ewha Womans University Medical Center, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyun Sik Gong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Sungnam, South Korea
| | - Goo Hyun Baek
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
The Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Steroid Injection Combined with Miniscalpel-Needle Release in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome vs. Steroid Injection Alone: A Randomized Controlled Study. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2019; 2019:9498656. [PMID: 30915366 PMCID: PMC6409054 DOI: 10.1155/2019/9498656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2018] [Revised: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is one of the most common nerve entrapment syndromes, which has a serious impact on patients' work and life. The most effective conservative treatment is steroid injection but its long-term efficacy is still not satisfactory. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of steroid injection combined with miniscalpel-needle (MSN) release for treatment of CTS under ultrasound guidance versus steroid injection alone. We hypothesized that combined therapy could be more beneficial. Methods Fifty-one patients with CTS were randomly allocated into two groups, namely, steroid injection combined with MSN release group and steroid injection group. The therapeutic effectiveness was evaluated using Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ), cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve, and four electrophysiological parameters, including distal motor latency (DML), compound muscle action potential (CMAP), sensory nerve action potential (SNAP), and sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks after treatment. Results Compared with baseline, all the parameters in both groups showed statistically significant improvement at week 4 and week 12 follow-up, respectively (P<0.05). When compared with steroid injection group, the outcomes including BCTQ, DML, CMAP, SNCV, and CSA of the median nerve were significantly better in steroid injection combined with MSN release group at week 12 after treatment (P<0.05). Conclusions The effectiveness of steroid injection combined with MSN release for CTS is superior to that of steroid injection alone, which may have important implications for future clinical practice. This Chinese clinical trial is registered with ChiCTR1800014530.
Collapse
|
41
|
Wu Y, Chen Q, Chen K, He F, Quan J, Chen S, Guo X. Clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided injection in the treatment of olecranon subcutaneous bursitis. JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 2019; 27:1145-1153. [PMID: 31609717 DOI: 10.3233/xst-190562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies have shown that ultrasound-guided injection of glucocorticoids is superior to blind puncture methods. OBJECTIVE To evaluate clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided drug injection in the treatment of olecranon subcutaneous bursitis. METHODS From June 2016 to September 2018, 45 patients diagnosed with obvious synovial effusion and treated with ultrasound-guided injection therapy for olecranon bursitis were included in this study. Under the guidance of ultrasound, the synovial effusion aspiration was performed and 2 ml of the compound betamethasone mixture was injected into the bursae and dressed under pressure. Ultrasound examination was performed 2 weeks after operation and the secondary fluid aspiration and drug injection treatment were performed. The depth of synovial effusion, the thickness of synovial hyperplasia and the blood flow signal were measured 4 weeks after operation to evaluate the therapeutic effect. RESULTS After first treatment, the recurrence rate of the olecranon mass were 40%. After secondary treatment, recurrence of olecranon mass occurred in 6 of the 45 patients with a recurrence rate of 13.3%. After 4 weeks of follow-up, the depth of olecranon synovial effusion, the average thickness of synovial hyperplasia and the blood flow signal decreased significantly after treatment (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Ultrasound-guided drug injection is safe and effective in treating olecranon subcutaneous bursitis. Although the recurrence rate is high after the first treatment, the second treatment is simple and can reduce the recurrence rate. The patients have a high acceptance rate, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanyan Wu
- Ultrasonic Department, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Qin Chen
- Ultrasonic Department, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Kai Chen
- Ultrasonic Department, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Fanding He
- Ultrasonic Department, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Jierong Quan
- Ultrasonic Department, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Shiyin Chen
- Chinese Medicine Orthopedics, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Xuanyan Guo
- Ultrasonic Department, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Wu YT, Ke MJ, Ho TY, Li TY, Shen YP, Chen LC. Randomized double-blinded clinical trial of 5% dextrose versus triamcinolone injection for carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Ann Neurol 2018; 84:601-610. [DOI: 10.1002/ana.25332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Revised: 08/12/2018] [Accepted: 09/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yung-Tsan Wu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Integrated Pain Management Center, Tri-Service General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center; Taipei Taiwan Republic of China
| | - Ming-Jen Ke
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
| | - Tsung-Yen Ho
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
| | - Tsung-Ying Li
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
- Integrated Pain Management Center, Tri-Service General Hospital, School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center; Taipei Taiwan Republic of China
| | - Yu-Ping Shen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Jurbala BM, Burbank TA. A Sonographically Guided In-Plane Distal-to-Proximal Transligamentous Approach to Carpal Tunnel Injections. Hand (N Y) 2018; 13:522-528. [PMID: 28825345 PMCID: PMC6109908 DOI: 10.1177/1558944717725375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several sonographically guided injection methods have been described to treat carpal tunnel syndrome. In most cases, the medication diffuses through the carpal tunnel to the site of maximum compression of the nerve after being injected proximally. In this article, we describe a novel method of sonographically guided carpal tunnel injection that utilizes a distal-to-proximal, in-plane, and transligamentous approach. This novel method may provide ergonomic as well as safety advantages to both clinicians and patients, and should be considered by those performing carpal tunnel injections. METHODS A distal-to-proximal transligamentous approach is taken, utilizing high-resolution ultrasound guidance. Once the median nerve is sonographically visualized longitudinally within the carpal tunnel, an ulnar shift is made with the transducer. With the median nerve out of view, the needle is inserted in-line and distal to the transducer on the palmar side of the hand, at the ulnar portion of Kaplan's cardinal line. Following a trajectory that is nearly parallel to the median nerve, the needle is sonographically guided to the site of maximum nerve compression. CONCLUSIONS This novel method provides an alternative to previous carpal tunnel injections. The use of ultrasound guidance allows the clinician to visualize and avoid the neurovascular structures near the median nerve and guide the needle to the site of maximum nerve compression. It is possible that this parallel trajectory with the median nerve will provide a lower risk of damage to the nerve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Troy A. Burbank
- Highland Center for Orthopaedics, Lakeland, FL, USA,Troy A. Burbank, Highland Center for Orthopaedics, 2161 CR 540A #286, Lakeland, FL 33813, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Comparison Between Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Injection Above Versus Below the Median Nerve in Mild to Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 97:407-413. [DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000000877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
45
|
Huisstede BM, Randsdorp MS, van den Brink J, Franke TPC, Koes BW, Hoogvliet P. Effectiveness of Oral Pain Medication and Corticosteroid Injections for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 99:1609-1622.e10. [PMID: 29626428 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present an evidence-based overview of the effectiveness of oral pain medication and corticosteroid injections to treat carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). DATA SOURCES The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database were searched for relevant systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). STUDY SELECTION Two reviewers independently applied the inclusion criteria to select potential studies. DATA EXTRACTION Two reviewers independently extracted the data on pain (visual analog scale), function or recovery, and assessed the methodologic quality. DATA SYNTHESIS A best-evidence synthesis was performed to summarize the results of the included studies. Four reviews and 9 RCTs were included. For oral pain medication, strong and moderate evidence was found for the effectiveness of oral steroids versus placebo in the short term. Moderate evidence was found in favor of oral steroids versus splinting in the short term. No evidence was found for the effectiveness of oral steroids in the long term. For corticosteroid injections, strong evidence was found in favor of a corticosteroid injection versus a placebo injection and moderate evidence was found in favor of corticosteroid injection versus oral steroids in the short term. Also, in the short term, moderate evidence was found in favor of a local versus a systematic corticosteroid injection. Higher doses of corticosteroid injections seem to be more effective in the midterm; however, the benefits of corticosteroid injections were not maintained in the long term. CONCLUSIONS The reviewed evidence supports that oral steroids and corticosteroid injections benefit patient with CTS particularly in the short term. Although a higher dose of steroid injections seems to be more effective in the midterm, the benefits of oral pain medication and corticosteroid injections were not maintained in the long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bionka M Huisstede
- Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neurosciences, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Manon S Randsdorp
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke van den Brink
- Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neurosciences, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thierry P C Franke
- Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neurosciences, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bart W Koes
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Hoogvliet
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ultrasound-guided injection of carpal tunnel syndrome: A comparative study to blind injection. EGYPTIAN RHEUMATOLOGIST 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejr.2017.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
47
|
Karaahmet ÖZ, Gürçay E, Kara M, Serçe A, Kıraç Ünal Z, Çakcı A. Comparing the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus blind steroid injection in the treatment of severe carpal tunnel syndrome. Turk J Med Sci 2017; 47:1785-1790. [PMID: 29306239 DOI: 10.3906/sag-1704-97] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/aim: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound (US)-guided injection versus blind injection of corticosteroids in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Materials and methods: This prospective, randomized clinical trial included patients with severe CTS based on clinical and electrophysiological criteria. The patients were evaluated for clinical and electrophysiological parameters at baseline and 4 weeks after treatment. Symptom severity and hand function were assessed by the Boston questionnaire. The patients underwent blind injection or US-guided injection. Results: When compared with baseline, both groups showed significant improvement in Boston questionnaire scores and all electrophysiological parameters. Significant differences were observed between the groups for clinical parameters (Boston Symptom Severity Scale: P = 0.007; Functional Status Scale: P < 0.001) in favor of the US-guided group. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that both US-guided and blind injections were effective in reducing symptoms and improving hand function. US-guided injections may yield more effective clinical results in the short-term than blind injections in the treatment of patients with severe CTS.
Collapse
|
48
|
To P, McClary KN, Sinclair MK, Stout BA, Foad M, Hiratzka S, Stern PJ. The Accuracy of Common Hand Injections With and Without Ultrasound: An Anatomical Study. Hand (N Y) 2017; 12:591-596. [PMID: 28719974 PMCID: PMC5669333 DOI: 10.1177/1558944717692086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study is to determine the accuracy of hand injections with and without the aid of ultrasound (U/S) into the carpal tunnel, thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint, first dorsal compartment (DC) and the radiocarpal (RC) joint. METHODS Four participants of various level of experience injected the carpal tunnel, thumb CMC, first DC, and RC joint into 40 fresh frozen cadaver specimens with blue dye and radiographic contrast. Participants 1 and 2 were injected without U/S guidance, and participants 3 and 4 were injected with U/S guidance. A successful injection was determined by both fluoroscopy and dissection/direct observation. Additional information was recorded for each injection such as median nerve infiltration and evidence of thumb CMC arthrosis. RESULTS The overall accuracy for carpal tunnel, thumb CMC, first DC, and RC injections were 95%, 63%, 90%, and 90%, respectively. Success was compared with and without U/S guidance. Success rates were similar for each injection site, except the thumb CMC joint, where U/S participants had 25% higher accuracy. In the setting of thumb CMC arthrosis, the incidence of success was 38% for participants with no U/S aid and 72% for participants with U/S aid. There was a significant difference between participants who used U/S with the participant with more U/S experience being more successful. CONCLUSION Carpal tunnel, first DC, and RC injections had an accuracy of greater than 90%. Thumb CMC injections have a lower accuracy (63%) and one can improve accuracy with U/S. The accuracy of U/S-guided injections is dependent on the user and their experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip To
- OrthoArizona, Scottsdale, USA,Philip To, OrthoArizona, 5620 E. Bell Road, Scottsdale, AZ 85254, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Mohab Foad
- Beacon Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ultrasound-Guided Versus Landmark-Guided Local Corticosteroid Injection for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2017; 99:766-775. [PMID: 28943161 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Revised: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 08/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the literature and assess the comparative effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-guided local corticosteroid injections in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). DATA SOURCES Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), and Web of Science (from inception to February 1, 2017). STUDY SELECTION Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ultrasound-guided injection with landmark-guided injection in patients with CTS were included. DATA EXTRACTION Two authors independently screened abstracts and full texts. The outcomes of interest were Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) and Functional Status Scale (FSS) scores of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire and 4 electrodiagnostic parameters, including compound muscle action potential (CMAP), sensory nerve action potential (SNAP), distal motor latency (DML), and distal sensory latency (DSL). DATA SYNTHESIS Overall, 569 abstracts were retrieved and checked for eligibility; finally, 3 RCTs were included (181 injected hands). Pooled analysis showed that ultrasound-guided injection was more effective in SSS improvement (mean difference [MD], -.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], -.59 to -.32; P<.00001), whereas no significant difference was observed between the 2 methods in terms of the FSS (MD, -.25; 95% CI, -.56 to .05; P=.10). There were also no statistically significant differences in improvements of CMAP (MD, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.01 to 3.07; P=.05), SNAP (MD, -0.02; 95% CI, -6.27 to 6.23; P>.99), DML (MD, .05; 95% CI, -.30 to .39; P=.80), or DSL (MD, .00; 95% CI, -.65 to .65; P>.99). CONCLUSIONS This review suggested that ultrasound-guided injection was more effective than landmark-guided injection in symptom severity improvement in patients with CTS; however, no significant differences were observed in functional status or electrodiagnostic improvements between the 2 methods.
Collapse
|
50
|
So H, Chung VCH, Cheng JCK, Yip RML. Local steroid injection versus wrist splinting for carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Rheum Dis 2017; 21:102-107. [PMID: 28901660 DOI: 10.1111/1756-185x.13162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ho So
- Kwong Wah Hospital; Tung Wah Group of Hospitals; Hong Kong China
| | - Vincent C. H. Chung
- The Chinese University of Hong Kong; Tung Wah Group of Hospitals; Hong Kong China
| | | | - Ronald M. L. Yip
- Integrated Diagnostic and Medical Centre; Tung Wah Group of Hospitals; Hong Kong China
| |
Collapse
|