Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Jul 26, 2017; 9(7): 609-619
Published online Jul 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i7.609
Table 1 Study design and participant characteristics
Ref.Study design/country/yearNo. of participantsMean age% maleParticipant inclusion criteria and procedural details
Benit et al[26]Randomized trial; Belgium; 1994-19955057.7100%Participants had transradial coronary angioplasty with 6-Fr catheters and Palmaz-Schatz stent
Campeau et al[27]Cohort study; Canada; Unclear10058 (median)90%Participants had transradial coronary angiogram with 5-Fr, 6-Fr and 7-Fr sheath
Chatelain et al[28]Cohort study; Switzerland; 1995-19971596082%Participants had transradial diagnostic and interventional cardiac procedures with 4-Fr, 5-Fr or 6-Fr introducer sheath and guide catheters with RadiStop radial compression system
De Belder et al[29]Cohort study; United Kingdom; Unclear75Unclear69%Participants had transradial coronary angiography and intervention and severe peripheral vascular disease with 5-Fr or 6-Fr sheath and 6-Fr guide catheter
Kiemeneij et al[30]Cohort study; The Netherlands; 1992-19931006277%Participants had transradial coronary angiography with 6-Fr introducer and 6-Fr-guide catheters
Lotan et al[31]Cohort study; Israel; 19941006179%Participants had transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty with 6-Fr introducer and 6-Fr guide catheters
Prull et al[32]Cohort study; Germany; Unclear9362.580.6%Participants had transradial diagnostic cardiac catheterization with 5-Fr or 6-Fr sheath or transradial coronary intervention with 7-Fr sheath
Sciahbasi et al[33]Prospective cohort study; Italy; Unclear996572%Participants had transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty with 6-Fr introducer sheath
Tharmaratnam et al[35]Retrospective case control study; United Kingdom; 2005-2006128365.579%Participants had transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty
Valgimigli et al[39]Prospective cohort study; The Netherlands, Italy; 20149427073%Participants had transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty
Van Leeuwen et al[24]Prospective cohort study; The Netherlands; 20152866472%Participants had transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty with 6-Fr introducer sheath
Wu et al[37]Cohort study; United States; 1996-1998406588%Participants underwent 6-Fr and 8-Fr transradial procedure
Zankl et al[34]Prospective cohort study; Germany; 2010488UnclearUnclearParticipants had transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty with 5- and 6-Fr introducer, 4-, 5- and 6-Fr catheters
Table 2 Results of studies
Ref.Measure of hand function and vascular complicationsFollow up post procedureResults
Benit et al[26]Local complications assessed in clinic by history and EMG1 moNerve damage documented by EMG: 0/50 Local pain: 0/50
Campeau et al[27]Patients were re-examined or questioned over telephone about local complications1 to 3 moNo nerve injury: 0/100
Chatelain et al[28]Physicians assessed for any clinical eventsAssessment prior to dischargeParaesthesia of right thumb during exercise: 1/159
De Belder et al[29]Clinical evaluation4-6 wkHaematoma and paraethesia post procedure: 1/75 Hand sensation and function at 4-6 wk: 0/75
Kiemeneij et al[30]Examination and ultrasound study performed if radial artery pulsations or flow were absent1 to 3 moFunctional disability of the hand: 0/100
Lotan et al[31]Assessment methods unclear1 mo follow upSmall hematoma in wrist: 3/100 Small pseudoaneurysm: 2/100 Numbness of the thumb and index finger: 1/100 No flow on Doppler: 2/100
Prull et al[32]Clinical evaluation with ultrasoundPost-procedure assessmentVascular complication: 9/93 Motor skills, coordination or force reduction of hand after procedure: 0/93 No pseudoaneurysm: 0/93
Sciahbasi et al[33]Radial artery occlusion by ultrasound test. Handgrip strength by Jamar Plus dynamometer. Thumb and forefinger pinch test by Jamar Plus electronic pinch gaugeDay of procedure and at least 30 d follow upRadial artery occlusion: 9/99 Hand grip strength change at follow up: 0/99 Thumb and forefinger pinch test change at follow up: 0/99
Tharmaratnam et al[35]Questionnaire posted to address and clinical notes for significant clinical eventsUnclearProblem with radial access site: 166/1283 (12.9%) Pain at puncture site: 95/1283 (7.4%) Swelling: 46/1283 (3.6%) Bruising: 30/1283 (2.3%) Non-specific sensory abnormalities either pain or paraesthesia in hand: 22/1283 (1.71%)
Valgimigli et al[39]Radial artery occlusion by duplex echocardiographic examination. Hand grip strength test with dynanometerJust after procedure, 1 d, 30 d and 1 yrRadial artery occlusions at day 1: 5/942 Radial artery occlusions at 1 year: 3/942 Change in handgrip strength test: 0/942 Ischemic vascular or bleeding complications: 0/942
Van Leeuwen et al[24]Quick DASH questionnaire and CISS questionnaire. Patients were asked to describe any procedure-related extremity complaints or loss of function at 1 moPre, 30 d and 1 yr post procedureTemporary upper limb complaint (< 30 d): 26/286 (9%) Persisting upper limb complaint (> 30 d): 31/286 (11%) Pain: 13/286 Numbness: 2/286 Tingling: 3/286 Stiffness: 2/286 Less power: 2/286 Upper limb function by QuickDASH at 30 d: No change over time, baseline 4.55 (IQR 0-13.64), follow up 2.27 (IQR 0-9.32) Upper limb function by CISS at 30 d: No change over time Upper limb function by QuickDASH at 1 yr: no change over time, baseline 2.39 (IQR 0-13.64), follow up 0 (0-11.02) Cold intolerance was not associated with access route at 1 yr
Wu et al[37]Ultrasound assessment for radial artery occlusion, aneurysm or dissection. Grip strength based on dynamometer results. Palmar pinch, key pinch and tip pinch strength tests were assessed by dynamic endurance testLate follow up 315 dHand complication in hospital: 0/40 Radial occlusion: 1/40 Late radial occlusions: 5/34 Radial artery aneurysm: 0/40 Radial artery dissection 0/40 Grip strength: Baseline 68 ± 34, post-catheterization 69 ± 35 Palmar pinch: Baseline 18 ± 10, post-catheterization 17 ± 6 Key pinch: Baseline 19 ± 7, post-catheterization 19 ± 6 Tip pinch: Baseline 14 ± 6, post-catheterization 14 ± 4 Endurance: Median for 6 Fr and 8 Fr is 78 (IQR 53, 108) and 58 (IQR 32, 68) respectively, post-catheterization 58 (IQR 47, 84) and 56 (IQR 38, 80), respectively
Zankl et al[34]Assessment with ultrasound4 wk follow upRadial artery occlusion at 1 d: 51/488 Persistent radial artery occlusion at 4 wk: 21/488 Radial nerve paralysis: 1/488
Table 3 Summary of pooled results for hand dysfunction or vascular complications post transradial procedure
Hand dysfunction or vascular complicationNo. of studiesNo of eventsNo of participantsPercentage of events
Nerve damage3[26,27,34]16380.16%
Sensory loss, tingling and numbness5[24,28,29,31,35]2919031.52%
Pain3[24,26,35]10816196.67%
Hand function, disability, grip strength change, stiffness, power loss and hand complications6[24,30,32,33,37,39]415600.26%
Vascular complications including occlusions, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm and dissection6[29,31,32,35,37,39]5417623.06%
Radial artery occlusion5[31,33,34,37,39]4016632.41%
Table 4 Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) Questionnaire
No difficultyMild difficultyModerate difficultySevere difficultyUnable
1 Open a tight or new jar12345
2 Do heavy house hold chores eg. Wash walls, floors12345
3 Carry a shopping bag or briefcase12345
4 Wash your back12345
5 Use a knife to cut food12345
6 Recreational activities in which you take some force or impact through your arm shoulder or hand12345
7 During the past week to what extent has your arm, shoulder or hand problem interfered with your normal social activities with family, friends, neighbors or groups?12345
8 During the past week, were you limited in your work or other daily activities as a result of your arm, shoulder or hand problem?12345
9 Arm, shoulder or hand pain12345
10 Tingling12345
11 Sleep12345
Table 5 Cold Intolerance symptoms severity Questionnaire
QuestionsScore
Which of the following symptoms of cold intolerance do you experience in your injured limb on exposure to cold?
Pain, numbness, stiffness, weakness, aching, skin colour change (white/bluish white/blue)
How often do you experience these symptoms? (Please tick)
Continuously/all the time
Several times a day
Once a day
Once a week
Once a month or less
Never
When you develop cold induced symptoms, on your return to a warm environment are the symptoms relieved? (Please tick)
Not applicably
Within a few minutes
Within 30 min
After more than 30 min
What do you do to ease or prevent your symptoms occurring? (Please tick)
Take no special action
Keep hand in pocket
Wear gloves in cold weather
Wear gloves all the time
Avoid cold weather/stay indoors
Other (please specify)
How much does cold bother your injured hand in the following situations? (Please score 0-10)
Holding a glass of ice water
Holding a frozen package from the freezer
Washing in cold water
When you get out of a hot bath/shower with air room temperature
During cold wintry weather
Please state how each of the following activities have been affected as a consequence of cold induced symptoms in your injured hand and score each (please score 0-4)
Domestic chores
Hobbies and interests
Dressing and undressing
Tying your
Table 6 Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire
12345
A: Symptom severity scale (11 items)
1 How severe is the hand or wrist pain that you have at night?NormalSlightMediumSeriousVery serious
2 How often did hand or wrist pain wake you up during a typical night in the past two weeks?NormalOnce2-34-5> 5
3 Do you typically have pain in your hand or wrist during the daytime?No PainSlightMediumSeriousVery Serious
4 How often do you have hand or wrist pain during daytime?Normal1-2 times/d1 times/d> 5 times/dContinued
5 How long on average does an episode of pain last during the daytime?Normal< 10 min10-60 continued> 60 minContinued
6 Do you have numbness (loss of sensation) in your hand?NormalSlightMediumSevereVery Serious
7 Do you have weakness in your hand or wrist?NormalSlightMediumSevereVery Serious
8 Do you have tingling sensations in your hand?NormalSlightMediumSevereVery Serious
9 How severe is numbness (loss of sensation) or tingling at night?NormalSlightMediumSevereVery Serious
10 How often did hand numbness or tingling wake you up during a typical night during the past two weeks?NormalOnce2-3 times4-5 times> 5
11 Do you have difficulty with the grasping and use of small objects such as keys or pens?Without difficultyLittle difficultyModerate difficultyVery difficultyVery difficult
B: Functional status scale (8 items)
Writing
Buttoning of cloths
Holding a book while reading
Gripping of a telephone handle
Opening of jars
House hold chores
Carrying of grocery basket
Bathing and dressing