BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Cardiol. Oct 26, 2026; 18(10): 125519
Published online Oct 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.125519
Table 1 Depot-specific adipose and organ pathways in obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Depot or organ axis
Representative evidence
Proposed mechanism
Clinical measurability
Evidence maturity/key limitation
Subcutaneous adipose tissueLower subcutaneous adiposity, together with lower visceral adiposity, was associated with underweight, malnutrition, and poorer outcomes in an East Asian HFpEF cohort[6]; impaired lipid-buffering remains primarily a conceptual framework[8]Lipid spillover to ectopic depotsBody composition; indirect metabolic markersHuman observational association plus review-level conceptual evidence; direct subcutaneous lipid-buffering capacity has not been established in HFpEF (CT-based East Asian HFpEF cohort, n = 196 + contemporary review)
Visceral adiposityVisceral or central adiposity is associated with exercise limitation, higher exercise filling pressures, and poorer aerobic capacity[5,22]Insulin-resistant lipid stress; inflammatory activationCT/MRI; waist indices; visceral adiposity measuresHuman observational and invasive-physiology evidence; causality remains unproven (HFpEF imaging cohort + invasively phenotyped HFpEF cohort)
MASLD/liverMASLD is associated with incident heart failure, including HFpEF, whereas experimental NASH produces an HFpEF-like phenotype[20,21]Hepatic-metabolic stress; systemic inflammationLiver fat/stiffness; liver enzymes; metabolic risk indicesHuman longitudinal association plus preclinical mechanistic evidence; human causality remains uncertain (longitudinal human cohort + experimental NASH model)
Skeletal-muscle fatIntermuscular fat is associated with worse functional limitation, and impaired skeletal muscle mitochondrial respiration is associated with exercise intolerance[22,28]Impaired peripheral metabolic and oxygen-utilization reserveCT/MRI muscle composition; grip strength; gait speedHuman imaging/biopsy associations; clinically validated thresholds are lacking (human HFpEF imaging + skeletal biopsy studies)
Epicardial adipose tissueEAT burden is associated with pericardial constraint and atrial/ventricular dysfunction, whereas lower EAT density is associated with adverse cardiometabolic phenotype and outcomes[23,24,40]Local mechanical and paracrine amplifierEchocardiography, CT, CMR; EAT volume/densityHuman observational, invasive-physiology, and prospective imaging evidence; EAT density is not a direct measure of inflammation and whether EAT is a mediator or marker remains unresolved (HFpEF observational/invasive-physiology cohorts + prospective imaging cohort, n = 154)
Perivascular adipose tissuePericoronary adipose tissue attenuation on CT is associated with HFpEF[41]Possible vascular-adipose inflammatory and remodeling interfaceCT perivascular fat attenuationRetrospective human imaging association; direct causal and histological validation in HFpEF is lacking (retrospective CCTA/echocardiography cohort, n = 607)
Table 2 Proposed phenotype-enriched research and trial-design framework for obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Candidate phenotype axis
Phenotype-enrichment variables
Candidate intervention domain for prospective testing
Key trial monitoring variables
Evidence maturity; key limitation (study design/population/model)
Circulatory overloadCongestion; elevated filling pressure; plasma-volume expansion; exercise PCWP elevationDecongestion strategies; SGLT2 inhibitors; MRA/finerenone according to established clinical indicationsRenal function; blood pressure; potassium; volume depletionTier I: EMPEROR-Preserved[55]; DELIVER[56]; FINEARTS-HF[59]. Tier II: CAMEO-DAPA[25]. Randomized outcome trials in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction; randomized placebo-controlled HFpEF hemodynamic study
EAT/pericardial restraintHigh EAT burden and/or low computed tomography-derived EAT density; right-sided congestion; pericardial restraint; atrial enlargementDecongestion; obesity-directed strategies for prospective testing; serial EAT imaging as a research measureImaging availability; overdiuresis risk; symptom-volume mismatchTier II: SUMMIT CMR substudy[62]. Tier III: Crum et al[23]; Jin et al[24]; Liu et al[40]. HFpEF-obesity randomized-trial CMR substudy; invasive-physiology HFpEF cohort; observational HFpEF imaging cohort; prospective HFpEF imaging cohort, n = 154
Inflammatory-metabolic phenotypeElevated CRP/IL-6; leptin/resistin imbalance; TyG/HOMA-IR; diabetes/metabolic syndromeIncretin-based obesity therapy; exercise; SGLT2 inhibitors according to established indications; nutritional interventionGI intolerance; renal-volume status; lean-mass preservationTier I: STEP-HFpEF[10]; SUMMIT[11]. Tier III: Ramirez et al[26]; Lau et al[27]. Obesity-HFpEF randomized outcome trials; invasive-CPET biomarker cohort, n = 509; lipidomic cohort, n = 510
MASLD-dominant phenotypeLiver fat/stiffness; elevated metabolic risk; visceral adiposityWeight loss strategies; incretin-based therapy; SGLT2 inhibitors according to established indications; hepatometabolic risk controlLiver markers; nutrition; sarcopenia riskTier III: Chang et al[20]. Tier IV: Kucsera et al[21]. Longitudinal human cohort; experimental NASH model
Frailty/sarcopenic obesityLow muscle mass; poor grip strength or gait speed; low exercise reserveResistance training; protein/nutrition support; cautious weight-loss strategiesLean-mass loss; falls; undernutritionTier II: Edelmann et al[53]; SURMOUNT-1 DXA substudy[63]. Tier III: Upadhya et al[54]. HFpEF randomized exercise trial with secondary functional outcomes; randomized DXA substudy in adults with obesity or overweight, not an HFpEF-specific population and therefore indirect body-composition evidence; small long-term HFpEF follow-up
Atrial-myopathy dominant phenotypeLow LA strain; AF; EAT proximity; LA enlargement; right-sided congestionAF/rhythm management; decongestion according to established indications; obesity-directed weight loss strategies; EAT-aware assessment as a research measureAtrial reserve; anticoagulation eligibility; renal functionTier II: STEP-HFpEF atrial-fibrillation analysis[65]. Tier III: Weerts et al[48]; Wang et al[49]. Pooled randomized-trial secondary analysis; HFpEF observational atrial-function/imaging cohorts


Write to the Help Desk