Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Cardiol. May 26, 2025; 17(5): 106541
Published online May 26, 2025. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i5.106541
Table 1 Classification of myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries based on pathophysiological mechanisms
Category
Mechanism
Description
Atherosclerotic causesPlaque erosionPartial thrombus formation without significant luminal obstruction due to endothelial dysfunction and inflammation
Coronary microembolizationSmall emboli from an atherosclerotic plaque cause transient ischemia without visible stenosis
Coronary microvascular dysfunctionEndothelial dysfunction and increased arterial stiffness impair myocardial perfusion
Non-atherosclerotic causesCoronary vasospasmTransient epicardial or microvascular constriction triggered by endothelial dysfunction, sympathetic activation, or vasoconstrictive agents leading to ischemia
Spontaneous coronary artery dissectionIntimal tear or intramural hematoma causes lumen compression and ischemia. It is often associated with fibromuscular dysplasia and peripartum changes
Myocardial oxygen supply-demand mismatchIncreased myocardial oxygen demand in conditions like anemia, tachyarrhythmias, hypertensive crises, and sepsis
Table 2 Nondiscriminatory biomarkers in myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries
Biomarker
Description
CXCL-1Involved in neutrophil recruitment and inflammation. Elevated levels have been found indicating a high level of chronic inflammation in MINOCA patients
suPARsuPAR has chemotactic properties and is involved in inflammatory activity and microvascular dysfunction. Elevated levels are linked to inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in MINOCA
MPOA marker of oxidative stress and inflammation. Higher MPO levels are typically associated with atherosclerosis and can be elevated in typical MI, whereas MINOCA might present with lower MPO levels if inflammation is less pronounced
Table 3 Discriminatory biomarkers in myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries
Biomarker
Description
TRAILPlays a role in immune cell regulation and inflammation. It is downregulated in proportion to the severity of myocardial injury. Higher levels are observed in stable MINOCA patients
t-PAInvolved in fibrinolysis. The levels of t-PA could be altered in typical MI due to thrombus formation, whereas MINOCA may show lower fibrinolytic activity due to the lack of major coronary obstruction
NT-proBNPElevated in MINOCA due to myocardial stress, ventricular dysfunction, or microvascular dysfunction. It can indicate a worse prognosis
Table 4 Biomarkers in atherosclerotic lesions
Biomarker
Description
Clinical significance
hs-CRPhs-CRP is a sensitive marker of systemic inflammation and is elevated during plaque rupture or erosionHigh hs-CRP levels reflect ongoing inflammation in the atherosclerotic plaque, promoting its instability and rupture
MMP-9MMP-9 plays a key role in extracellular matrix degradation, which is involved in plaque rupture and erosionMMP-9 degrades collagen and elastin in the plaque, weakening the fibrous cap and increasing the risk of rupture or erosion
CD40LCD40L is involved in platelet activation and inflammation, playing a role in plaque rupture and thromboembolismCD40L stimulates platelet aggregation and endothelial activation, contributing to plaque rupture and thromboembolism in MINOCA
P-selectinP-selectin mediates platelet and endothelial cell interactions, playing a role in thromboembolism and plaque instabilityP-selectin is involved in the recruitment of platelets to the site of plaque rupture or erosion, promoting thrombus formation
Table 5 Biomarkers in spontaneous coronary artery dissection
Biomarker
Description
Clinical significance
TGF-βTGF-β is an angiogenic factor involved in vascular remodeling, fibrosis, and smooth muscle cell proliferation. Dysregulation of TGF-β can cause abnormal composition of the arterial wall leading to SCADImpaired levels of TGF-β contribute to vascular remodeling and fibrosis, promoting the formation of dissection and impaired vessel function. A study found that miRNAs belonging to the TGF-β family were found to be expressed in high levels in patients with SCAD implicating the role of TGF-β in this disease pathology suggesting the potential of the miRNAs to be biomarkers of SCAD
Fibrillin 1 proteinFibrillin 1 is a structural component of the extracellular matrix, important for vascular integrity. Deficiency or mutation may lead to SCAD and MINOCAImpaired fibrillin 1 leads to compromised vascular integrity, making arteries prone to dissection and subsequent myocardial ischemia
EosinophilsHigh levels of circulating eosinophils were found in patients with SCAD. Eosinophil activation and infiltration in the adventitial layer of the coronary artery causes lytic substances degranulation resulting in vascular damage in SCAD and MINOCAEosinophil infiltration promotes vascular inflammation and damage, which may contribute to SCAD development and microvascular dysfunction
Table 6 Biomarkers of supply-demand mismatch
Biomarker
Description
Clinical significance
MR-proANPMR-proANP is involved in cardiac stress response and is an indicator of atrial stretch. It is proposed to be elevated in MINOCA due to acute myocardial stress or inflammationIt reflects atrial and ventricular stress, which may arise from microvascular dysfunction, inflammatory processes, or stress-induced myocardial injury, all of which could contribute to MINOCA. It helps in diagnosing myocardial injury when coronary arteries appear unobstructed
CT-proET1CT-proET-1 is a marker of endothelin-1 precursor, a potent vasoconstrictor involved in vascular tone and cardiac remodeling. Elevated levels suggest endothelial dysfunctionElevated CT-proET-1 levels in MINOCA indicate impaired endothelial function and increased vasoconstriction, potentially contributing to myocardial ischemia despite normal coronary artery findings. Endothelin-1 can cause vasoconstriction, leading to reduced myocardial perfusion, a mechanism in MINOCA
MR-proADMMR-proADM is a biomarker related to adrenomedullin, a vasodilator, and marker of endothelial dysfunction. It is elevated in conditions of heart failure, sepsis, and myocardial injuryMR-proADM reflects the systemic vasodilatory response and endothelial dysfunction, which may result from microvascular spasm, inflammation, or altered myocardial perfusion in MINOCA. High levels correlate with worse prognosis and heart failure in these patients
GDF-15GDF15 is a stress-induced cytokine elevated in response to inflammation, oxidative stress, and myocardial injury. It is thought to be a biomarker of myocardial stress in MINOCAGDF15 reflects myocardial injury and inflammation, which may result from microvascular dysfunction or myocardial stress in the absence of obstructive coronary disease. Elevated levels suggest a heightened inflammatory response and oxidative stress, both of which can contribute to the pathophysiology of MINOCA. It is related to adverse cardiovascular outcomes
Table 7 Biomarkers involved in coronary artery spasm and coronary microvascular dysfunction
Biomarker
Description
Clinical significance
CRPCRP is a marker of systemic inflammation, and elevated levels indicate ongoing inflammation, which may contribute to CAS and CMDElevated CRP levels are associated with poor prognosis in MINOCA, reflecting chronic inflammation and vascular dysfunction
IL-6IL-6 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that plays a central role in inflammatory responses and vascular injury. Elevated IL-6 levels are linked with CMD and spasmsHigh IL-6 levels indicate an inflammatory state, which can exacerbate CMD and increase the risk of MINOCA
Lp(a)Lp(a) is an atherogenic lipoprotein that can contribute to endothelial dysfunction, promoting both CAS and CMDLp(a) is higher in patients with spastic sites of coronary arteries
Rho-associated protein kinaseRho kinase activates myosin light chain kinase through phosphorylation. Rho kinase thus regulates smooth muscle contraction and endothelial function. It is involved in coronary artery spasm and microvascular dysfunctionIncreased Rho kinase activity is linked with impaired vasodilation and increased vasoconstriction, contributing to CAS and CMD in MINOCA
Table 8 Cardiac magnetic resonance findings and diagnoses in myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries
Cause of MINOCA
CMR findings
Description
Acute myocarditisLake Louise criteriaCMR shows myocardial edema, capillary leaks, hyperemia, and necrosis/fibrosis. Lake Louise criteria include T2 weighted imaging for edema and T1 weighted imaging before and after contrast for tissue characterization (LGE pattern)
LGELGE typically shows subepicardial or transmural enhancement, often in a nonvascular distribution (inflammatory infiltration rather than ischemic)
T2 weighted imagingT2 signal hyperintensity, indicating myocardial edema
T1 weighted imagingHelps identify myocardial fibrosis and scar tissue
Takotsubo cardiomyopathyRWMACMR shows apical ballooning with increased myocardial strain in the apex of the (LV) but with absence of coronary artery obstruction
LGELGE is typically absent or minimal in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, helping to distinguish it from myocardial infarction
T2 weighted imagingT2 hyperintensity may show myocardial edema in the involved regions of the LV
No obstructive coronary diseaseNo significant coronary artery blockage or stenosis is identified
Plaque ruptureLGELGE in a subendocardial or transmural pattern corresponding to a vascular territory, often localized to the area of infarction after plaque rupture
T2 weighted imagingEdema is typically seen in a coronary regional distribution, reflecting the infarcted area from the ruptured plaque
No obstructive coronary diseaseCoronary artery spasm or microvascular dysfunction might be present but not significant obstruction
Plaque erosionLGELGE may be present in a subendocardial or transmural pattern, typically corresponding to a vascular territory
T2 weighted imagingEdema localized to the region supplied by the affected artery
No significant obstructionCoronary imaging may show plaque erosion or microembolism, but not significant stenosis
Table 9 Optical coherence tomography findings and diagnoses in myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries
OCT finding
Description
Plaque ruptureDefined by the presence of fibrous cap discontinuity with a cavity formation within the plaque
Plaque erosionPresence of thrombus overlying an intact plaque, without rupture
Calcific noduleDisruption of the fibrous cap and/or thrombus overlying a calcified plaque with protruding calcification into the lumen
Lone thrombusPresence of thrombus overlying an intact coronary arterial wall, without any visible plaque rupture or erosion
Coronary artery spasmCharacterized by intimal bumping with a larger medial area and medial thickness
Spontaneous coronary artery dissectionSeparation of the intimal layer from the outer vessel wall with a blood column between the two
Table 10 Observational studies on the efficacy of cardioprotective therapies in myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries
Ref.MethodologyResults
DAPT
Statins
Beta-blockers
ACEI/ARB
CCB
Lindahl et al[65], 2017Observational study on the data from the SWEDEHEART registry collected between July 2003 and June 2013 and followed up to December 2013, involving 9466 cases of MINOCA. Incidence of MACE was measured after a mean follow-up of 4.1 yearsNonsignificant 10% reduction in MACE post-discharge (HR = 0.90; 95%CI: 0.74-1.08)Significant 23% reduction in MACE (HR = 0.77; 95%CI: 0.68-0.87)Nonsignificant 14% reduction in MACE (HR = 0.86; 95%CI: 0.74-1.01)Significant 18% reduction in MACE rate (HR = 0.82; 95%CI: 0.73-0.93)N/A
Paolisso et al[68], 2019Study based on the database of Bologna University Hospital between January 2016 and December 2018 involving patients of acute myocardial infarction (including 134 MINOCA cases) undergoing coronary angiography within the first 48 hours of hospitalization. The average follow-up period was 19.35 ± 10.6 monthsA nonsignificant reduction in MACE (HR = 0.42; 95%CI: 0.14-1.24)A nonsignificant reduction in MACE (HR = 0.44; 95%CI: 0.16-1.22)A nonsignificant reduction in MACE (HR = 0.43; 95%CI: 0.14-1.35)Significant reduction in MACE (HR = 0.29; 95%CI: 0.10-0.81)N/A
Abdu et al[67], 2020Single center retrospective study on 259 MINOCA patients between 2014 to 2018 after a follow-up duration of 2 yearsNonsignificant effect on MACE (HR = 1.53; 95%CI: 0.78-3.01)Significant decrease in MACE (HR = 0.467; 95%CI: 0.239-0.911)Nonsignificant effect on MACE (HR = 1.043; 95%CI: 0.547-1.988)Significant decrease in MACE (HR = 0.486; 95%CI: 0.237-0.996)N/A
Kovach et al[66], 2021A propensity-matching study on the data collected from the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting and Tracking program on troponin-positive patients who had undergone coronary angiography between October 2008 and September 2017. The positive cohort consisted of 1986 cases of MINOCA. The mean follow-up period is 1 yearNonsignificant effect on MACE with P2Y12 inhibitor (HR = 1.02; 95%CI: 0.58-1.80)Significant decrease in MACE (HR = 0.34; 95%CI: 0.23-0.51)Nonsignificant effect on MACE (HR = 1.09; 95%CI: 0.73-1.62)Significant decrease in MACE with ACEI use (HR = 0.51; 95%CI: 0.33-0.79)A nonsignificant reduction in MACE (HR = 0.63; 95%CI: 0.38-1.04)
Ciliberti et al[71], 2021A retrospective multicentric cohort study on 621 patients with MINOCA from 9 Hub Hospitals across Italy between March 2012 and March 2018. The mean follow-up duration is 90 monthsNonsignificant effect on MACE (HR = 2.25; 95%CI: 0.58-8.79)Nonsignificant effect on MACE (HR = 1.67; 95%CI: 0.91-3.05)Significant reduction in MACE observed (HR = 0.49; 95%CI: 0.31-0.79)Nonsignificant effect on MACE (HR = 0.70; 95%CI: 0.40-2.21)Nonsignificant effect on MACE (HR = 1.41; 95%CI: 0.77-2.50)
Bossard et al[64], 2021Post hoc analysis of the OASIS 7 trial comparing MACE outcomes among 1599 MINOCA patients with double-strength and standard clopidogrel-based DAPT regimen after a follow-up of 1 yearNo additional benefit of double-strength clopidogrel over the standard dose (HR = 3.57; 95%CI: 1.31-9.76)N/AN/AN/AN/A
Table 11 Summary of adverse effects associated with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries therapies
Therapeutic modality
Adverse effects
Aspirin (long-term therapy)Gastrointestinal bleeding, gastric ulceration, dyspepsia, increased hemorrhagic stroke risk, bronchospasm (in aspirin-sensitive asthma), renal dysfunction
P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel, ticagrelor, prasugrel)Bleeding (including gastrointestinal and intracranial), thrombocytopenia, dyspnea (ticagrelor), hypersensitivity reactions
Statin therapyMyopathy, rhabdomyolysis, hepatic dysfunction, new-onset diabetes, cognitive effects (rare), gastrointestinal upset
ACE inhibitors/ARBsHypotension, cough (ACE inhibitors), angioedema, hyperkalemia, renal dysfunction, dizziness
Beta-blockersBradycardia, hypotension, fatigue, dizziness, depression, erectile dysfunction, worsening bronchospasm in asthma/COPD
Calcium channel blockersHypotension, peripheral edema, flushing, headache, constipation (especially with verapamil), dizziness, reflex tachycardia (dihydropyridines)
Short-acting nitratesHeadache, hypotension, dizziness, reflex tachycardia, methemoglobinemia (rare), flushing, nitrate tolerance
Thrombolytic/anticoagulant therapyMajor bleeding (gastrointestinal, intracranial, retroperitoneal), thrombocytopenia (heparin-induced), hypersensitivity reactions, hematoma at injection site
Vitamin K antagonists (Warfarin)Bleeding complications need regular INR monitoring, skin necrosis (rare), drug interactions, purple toe syndrome
Unconventional agents for CMDDipyridamole: Headache, dizziness, hypotension, flushing, gastrointestinal discomfort
Ranolazine: QT prolongation, dizziness, constipation, nausea, palpitations
Imipramine: Anticholinergic effects, drowsiness, dry mouth, urinary retention
Aminophylline: Arrhythmias, CNS stimulation, nausea, tremors, seizures (at high doses)
Dual antiplatelet therapyIncreased bleeding risk, anemia, epistaxis, easy bruising, dyspepsia
Invasive interventions (PCI/stenting)Iatrogenic vessel injury, stent thrombosis, restenosis, arterial dissection, contrast-induced nephropathy, procedural bleeding, coronary spasm
Non-pharmacological approaches (cardiac rehabilitation, lifestyle modifications)Minimal direct risks, but unsupervised activity may lead to musculoskeletal injury or cardiovascular events in high-risk individuals