Liver transplantation (LT) is a life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage liver disease; however, with the growing shortage of organ donors, the need to identify futile transplants has become increasingly urgent. Futility in liver transplantation refers to situations where the expected post-transplant survival or quality of life is poor, making the procedure unlikely to yield a meaningful benefit. Various definitions of futility are used across different countries and transplant centers, with criteria often based on clinical factors such as age, comorbidities, MELD score, and functional status. For hepatologists and transplant surgeons, clearer guidelines are essential to make informed decisions and avoid unnecessary transplants that may place patients at risk without improving their prognosis. While some studies have proposed futility scores, there is currently no universal consensus on a standardized definition or set of criteria. This highlights the need for further prospective trials to evaluate the predictors of futility in liver transplantation, aiming to refine decision-making processes, optimize organ allocation, and improve patient outcomes. Future research should focus on the development of universally accepted futility criteria and explore interventions to mitigate the factors contributing to transplant futility.

Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is the foremost cause of liver-related mortality in the United States comprising a spectrum of conditions from simple hepatic steatosis to more severe alcohol-associated cirrhosis and alcohol-associated hepatitis. There has been growing acceptance and application of early liver transplantation (eLT) for ALD. There is robust evidence for excellent patient and graft survival rates for eLT for ALD. Nevertheless, recidivism remains a major concern. This article aims to explore the recent trends in liver transplantation for ALD, as well as the advances in practice and outcomes, with focus on eLT and emerging challenges in this field.

Alcohol-associated liver disease is now the leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States in the context of liver transplantation for patients with less than 6 months of abstinence from alcohol. To determine whether patients with less than 6 months of sobriety have worse perioperative outcomes than those with standard sobriety requirements, we performed a retrospective cohort study, comparing limited and standard sobriety patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation from May 2018 to October 2022 at a single academic tertiary transplant center. The limited sobriety cohort comprised adult patients with end-stage liver disease secondary to alcohol use disorder who presented with their first episode of hepatic decompensation, with less than 6 months of sobriety. This group was compared with a standard sobriety cohort, consisting of patients with alcohol-associated liver disease with more than 6 months of sobriety. A total of 169 patients were selected for analysis, with 58 in the limited sobriety group and 111 in the standard sobriety group. The limited- sobriety group was younger (median 42 years vs 54 years; P < .01) and had more severe liver disease than the standard sobriety group (median Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores of 39 vs 34; P < .01) at the time of transplantation. There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcomes between the 2 groups. Despite having more severe liver disease, the limited sobriety management pathway was not associated with worse perioperative outcomes than the standard sobriety pathway. Our findings indicate liver transplantation in patients with limited sobriety do not require increased perioperative resources.

Severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (SAH) carries high 1-month mortality. Corticosteroids provide a modest 28-day but not 90-day survival benefit, due to development of infections and organ failures. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) has shown promise in patients with SAH by its immunomodulatory and regenerative capabilities. We studied the safety and efficacy of combination (GCSF + prednisolone, GPred) therapy in management of steroid-eligible patients with SAH.

Steroid eligible patients with SAH (discriminant function scores 32-90) were randomized to receive prednisolone (GrA, n = 42), GPred (GrB, n = 42), or GCSF alone (GrC, n = 42). GCSF was given as 150-300 mcg/d for 7 days followed by every third day for a maximum of 12 doses in 1 month. Prednisolone 40 mg/d was given for 7 days and continued for 28 days in responders (Lille score <0.45).

Baseline characteristics of patient groups were comparable. On intention-to-treat analysis, the primary endpoint of 90-day survival was achieved in 64.3% (27/42) in prednisolone, 88.1% (37/42) in GPred, and 78.6%(33/42) in GCSF groups, respectively ( P = 0.03, prednisolone vs GPred). The 28-day survival was not different between the groups (85.7%, 95.2%, and 85.7%, respectively [ P = 0.27]). The GPred group had more responders by day 7 (71.4% vs 92.9% vs 76.2%, P = 0.037) and had greater reduction in discriminant function (-7.33 ± 4.78, -24.59 ± 3.7, -14.59 ± 3.41, P = 0.011) and MELDNa (-1.69 ± 1.26, -7.02 ± 1.24, -3.05 ± 0.83, P = 0.002) by day 90. The prednisolone-only group had higher incidence of new infections (35.7%, 19%, 7.1%, respectively, P < 0.002). Acute kidney injury (33.3%, 7.1%, 11.9%, P = 0.002), hepatic encephalopathy (35.7%, 9.5%, 26.2%, P = <0.001), and rehospitalizations (59.5%, 14.3%, 30.9%, P =<0.01) were lower in the GPred group.

Addition of GCSF to prednisolone improves steroid responsiveness and 90-day survival with fewer infections and new onset complications in patients with SAH.

The use of methylprednisolone (MP) is still controversial for hepatitis B virus related acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF). We aimed to explore the change in dendritic cells (DCs) during MP treatment in HBV-ACLF to guide the use of MP to improve patient's prognosis.

Patients with HBV-ACLF were prospectively allocated to groups given methylprednisolone intravenously (1.5 mg/kg/day for the first 3 days, 1 mg/kg/day for the second 2 days, and 0.5 mg/kg/day for the last 2 days, MP group, n = 36) plus standard treatment or standard treatment only (CM group, n = 34). The phenotype [myeloid and plasmacytoid DCs (mDCs, pDCs)] and function of DCs (IL-12 and IFN-α production) were measured at baseline (0d), 3d, 7d, 10d, 14d, 28d, and then monthly until 3 months. Patients' survival was assessed until day 90.

The 3-month survival rate was significantly higher in the MP group than the control (72.0 % vs. 35.5 %，P < 0.01). The phenotype and function of DCs were suppressed in the MP group. The mDCs counts was lower in non-survivors compared to survivors at baseline. Patients with a decline in mDCs counts at the 7th day and a continuous increase in mDCs counts from the 10th day presented a better outcome for patients with MP treatment. Bilirubin was the only relative factor for the restoration of mDCs in the MP group (odds ratio, 0.991; 95 % confidence interval, 0.984-0.999; P = 0.023).

Methylprednisolone could improve the outcome of HBV-ACLF by inhibiting the circulating mDCs counts. And the recovery of mDCs counts after methylprednisolone treatment could represent a favorable response. We can consider monitoring the circulating DCs counts to guide the use of MP in HBV-ACLF in order to improve patient outcomes.

Alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) is a severe form of alcohol-associated liver disease characterized by acute-onset jaundice and liver failure. AH carries a high mortality risk, particularly in severe cases. Although glucocorticoids have been the primary pharmacologic intervention for decades, their use is limited by a lack of long-term efficacy and significant side effects and relative contraindications. For patients who do not respond to glucocorticoids, early liver transplantation is a life-saving option; only a few patients qualify for this intervention, however. In recent years, advances in translational medicine have uncovered key mechanisms in AH pathophysiology, including microbiome interactions, proinflammatory signaling, and disruptions in hepatocyte function. These insights have led to the exploration of innovative pharmacologic treatments, targeting pathways such as the gut-liver axis, oxidative stress, inflammation, and liver regeneration. Despite promising results from ongoing clinical trials, several challenges persist, including low patient recruitment and retention rates, heterogeneity in trial design, and the lack of standardized endpoints. This review assesses the current pharmacologic landscape of AH, emphasizing emerging therapies and the ongoing challenges in AH clinical trials.

Alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) is still to this date one of the leading causes of chronic liver disease globally. ALD comprises a wide disease spectrum, from the benign liver steatosis, to the life-threatening inflammatory acute phenotype of alcoholic hepatitis (AH) and ultimately, advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. AH represents an acute inflammatory liver condition caused by prolonged high quantities of alcohol intake. Disease outcome varies from mild to severe, with systemic implication and high mortality. Although the pathogenesis has been extensively studied over the years, little progress has been made regarding therapeutic options. In over 50 years, steroid treatment is still the cornerstone therapeutic option, albeit having multiple limitations and a low success rate. On the other hand, important progress has been made regarding disease management and severity stratification with the implementation of different prognostic score. Although highly prevalent, AH still has many unmet needs, with a growing necessity for novel non-invasive diagnosis, prognosis biomarkers and impactful treatment options.

Alcohol related hepatitis is responsible for high morbidity and mortality, but little is known about the management of patients with hepatitis specifically in intensive care units (ICU).

Retrospective study including patients with alcohol related hepatitis hospitalized in 9 French ICUs (2006-2017). Alcohol related hepatitis was defined histologically or by an association of clinical and biological criteria according to current guidelines.

187 patients (median age: 53 [43-60]; male: 69%) were included. A liver biopsy was performed in 51% of cases. Patients were admitted for impaired consciousness (71%), sepsis (64%), shock (44%), respiratory failure (37%). At admission, median SOFA and MELD scores were 10 [7-13] and 31 [26-40] respectively. 63% of patients received invasive mechanical ventilation, 62% vasopressors, and 36% renal replacement therapy. 66% of patients received corticosteroids, and liver transplantation was performed in 16 patients (8.5%). ICU and in-hospital mortality were 37% and 53% respectively. By multivariate analysis, ICU mortality was associated with SOFA score (without total bilirubin) (SHR 1.08 [1.02-1.14] per one-point increase), arterial lactate (SHR 1.08 [1.03-1.13] per 1 mmol/L) and MELD score (SHR 1.09 [1.04-1.14] per 1 point), while employment was associated with increased survival (HR 0.49 [0.28-0.86]). After propensity score weighting, the use of corticosteroids did not affect ICU mortality in the overall population but had a beneficial effect in the subgroup of patients with histological proof. Patient prognosis was also better in responders assessed by Lille score at day 7 (OR 6.67 [2.44-20.15], p < 0.001).

Alcohol related hepatitis is a severe condition leading to high mortality in ICU patients. Severity of organ failure at admission are mortality risk factors. Outcome was significantly better in responders to corticosteroids therapy according to Lille score. Early referral to tertiary centers to discuss liver transplantation should more widely be considered.

Early (i.e., without mandated period of abstinence) liver transplant (LT) for alcohol-associated hepatitis is the fastest-growing indication for LT in the United States and Europe. Harmful alcohol use after LT is associated with poor outcomes, but the distinction of establishing abstinence after return to drinking (i.e., reabstinence) is understudied. This study aims to characterize the survival outcomes of achieving reabstinence after post-LT harmful alcohol use.

We analyzed early LT recipients from 12 US LT centers between 2006 and 2021. Post-LT alcohol use was characterized as harmful using criteria of "binge" (≥5 [men] or ≥4 [women] drinks in < 24 hours) or "frequent" (≥4 days in one week) by interview or phosphatidylethanol >20 ng/mL. Reabstinence was defined as ≥12 consecutive months without harmful alcohol use after harmful alcohol use.

Among 347 LT recipients (64% male, median age 43, median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium score 38) with median post-LT follow-up of 2.2 years (interquartile interval 1.1-3.6), 276 (80%) recipients had no evidence of harmful alcohol use, 35 (10%) recipients had reabstinence, and 36 (10%) recipients had continued harmful alcohol use without reabstinence. Five-year predicted survival, adjusted for age, sex, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium score, was lowest among LT recipients with continued harmful alcohol use (77%), but similar among those with no harmful use (93%) and reabstinence (94%).

Achieving reabstinence after post-LT harmful alcohol use is associated with similar 5-year post-LT survival compared with those without evidence of post-LT harmful alcohol use. Our findings highlight the importance of early detection and treatment of post-LT alcohol use.

Severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (SAH) is associated with high short-term mortality, and failure of response to corticosteroids is associated with a mortality of ~70%-80% within 6 months. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has been studied in steroid non-responders; however, the data are limited.

This is a multicentre retrospective cohort study. The study period was from January 2016 to November 2023. SAH was defined as alcohol-associated hepatitis (ICD-10-CM codes) with serum bilirubin ≥ 5.0 mg/dL and INR ≥ 1.5. Other aetiologies of acute hepatitis and biliary obstruction were excluded. The primary outcome was 90-day median overall survival in SAH patients treated with G-CSF compared with standard medical therapy (SMT) or corticosteroids. Propensity score (1:1) matching was performed to control confounding variables.

Among 20 132 patients with SAH, 10800 (53.65%) were treated with corticosteroids and 224 (1.11%) G-CSF. The G-CSF group was younger (45.5 vs. 48.4) White (79.91% vs. 72.40%); however, there was no age or gender difference between G-CSF and corticosteroid groups. Whites and patients with more comorbidities received G-CSF more frequently than SMT or corticosteroids. After propensity score matching, 90-day overall survival was better in patients who received G-CSF (88.31% vs. 62.36%, p < 0.01) compared with SMT or corticosteroids (88.31% vs. 74.39%, p < 0.01). Patients on G-CSF had better 6-month transplant-free survival compared with SMT (83.53% vs. 55.36%, p < 0.001) or corticosteroids (82.89% vs. 60.21%, p < 0.001). Gastrointestinal bleeding was less common in G-CSF group compared with corticosteroids (5.02% vs. 10.50%, p < 0.001).

A small minority of patients with severe alcohol-associated hepatitis receive G-CSF. G-CSF improves 90-day overall survival in patients with severe alcohol-associated hepatitis and is non-inferior to corticosteroids.

In carefully selected individuals, outcomes of early deceased donor liver transplantation (<6 months of sobriety) for severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (AAH) are similar to transplant for other indications. There is increasing interest in the expansion of living donor liver transplant (LDLT) for AAH.

A literature search was conducted in PubMed using search terms 'alcoholic hepatitis,' 'alcohol-associated hepatitis,' 'acute liver failure' and 'living donor liver transplant' between 1995 and 2025. Additional data sources were the International Registry in Organ Donation and Transplantation, and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We summarize the global burden of alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), and the emergence of early LT for AAH. Donor- and recipient-specific factors are explored, as well as societal considerations including equitable allocation and health system financial impact. Finally, current LT practices for ALD by region are reviewed, with a focus on readiness for expansion of LDLT for AAH.

Use of LDLT for AAH is infrequent, but countries with experience in LT for AAH and/or LDLT for acute liver failure are most poised to expand to LDLT for AAH. Progress is needed in assessing risk of return to harmful drinking and improving management of alcohol use disorder.

Short-term mortality in alcohol-related hepatitis (AH) is high, and no current therapy results in durable benefit. A role for interleukin (IL)-1β has been demonstrated in the pathogenesis of alcohol-induced steatohepatitis. This study explored the safety and efficacy of canakinumab (CAN), a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-1β, in the treatment of patients with AH.

Participants with biopsy-confirmed AH and discriminant function ≥32 but Model for End-Stage Liver Disease ≤27 were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive either CAN 3 mg/kg or placebo (PBO). Liver biopsies were taken before and 28 days after treatment. The primary endpoint was the overall histological improvement in inflammation analyzed by the modified intention-to-treat principle.

Fifty-seven participants were randomized: 29 to CAN and 28 to PBO. Two participants had histology that did not corroborate the clinical diagnosis. Of the remaining 55 participants, paired histology data were evaluable from 48 participants. In CAN-treated participants, 14 (58%) of 24 demonstrated histological improvement compared with 10 (42%) of 24 in the PBO group (P = .25). There was no improvement in prognostic scores of liver function. Four (7%) of the 55 participants died within 90 days, 2 in each group. The number of serious adverse events was similar between CAN vs PBO. In post hoc exploratory analyses after adjustment for baseline prognostic factors, CAN therapy was associated with overall histological improvement (P = .04).

CAN therapy in severe AH participants with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease ≤27 did not alter biochemical or clinical outcomes compared with PBO. Nonsignificant histological improvements did not translate into clinical benefit. EudraCT, Number: 2017-003724-79; ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT03775109.

Several dynamic models predict mortality and corticosteroid response in alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), yet no consensus exists on the most effective model. This study aimed to assess predictive models for corticosteroid response and short-term mortality in severe AH within a global cohort. We conducted a multi-national study of patients with severe AH treated with corticosteroids for at least 7 days, enrolled between 2009 and 2019. Dynamic models-Lille-4, Lille-7, trajectory of serum bilirubin (TSB), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)-were used to estimate 30- and 90-day mortality. Lille-7 demonstrated the highest accuracy for both 30- and 90-day mortality.

Severe alcohol-related hepatitis (sAH) is a potentially life-threatening complication of alcohol-related liver disease. SIRS criteria have been related to disease severity and may be a prognostic factor. Recently, qSOFA has been shown to be more prognostically accurate than SIRS in other inflammatory conditions. To determine whether qSOFA is a better prognostic score than SIRS criteria in sAH. We included 62 consecutive patients admitted for sAH, defined by modified Maddrey DF ≥ 32. MELD-Na, SIRS criteria and qSOFA score were calculated. Survival at 180 days was assessed. Twenty-four patients (38.7%) died after 180 days. Three or more SIRS criteria and two or more qSOFA criteria were associated with 180-day mortality (LR = 12.09, p = 0.001; LR = 4.81, p = 0.028, respectively). Patients with MELD-Na >30 points died during follow-up more frequently (LR = 5.997; p = 0.014). SIRS respiratory criterion (B = 5.113; p = 0.023) and qSOFA respiratory criterion (B = 5.985; p = 0.05), bilirubin (>10 mg/dL; LR = 5.43, p = 0.006), creatinine (>1 mg/dL; B = 5.885, p = 0.015) and hyponatraemia (LR= 5.75, p = 0.018) were associated with mortality. Cox Regression model revealed that only SIRS and MELD-Na were independent prognostic factors. SIRS criteria seem to be more useful for patients with sAH, as well as MELD-Na. In contrast, qSOFA has no independent prognostic value in patients with sAH.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a life-threatening syndrome characterized by decompensation of cirrhosis, severe systemic inflammation and organ failures. ACLF is frequently triggered by intra- and/or extrahepatic insults, such as bacterial infections, alcohol-related hepatitis or flares of hepatic viruses. The imbalance between systemic inflammation and immune tolerance causes organ failures through the following mechanisms: (i) direct damage of immune cells/mediators; (ii) worsening of circulatory dysfunction resulting in organ hypoperfusion and (iii) metabolic alterations with prioritization of energetic substrates for inflammation and peripheral organ 'energetic crisis'. Currently, the management of ACLF includes the support of organ failures, the identification and treatment of precipitating factors and expedited assessment for liver transplantation (LT). Early LT should be considered in patients with ACLF grade 3, who are unlikely to recover with the available treatments and have a mortality rate > 70% at 28 days. However, the selection of transplant candidates and their prioritization on the LT waiting list need standardization. Future challenges in the ACLF field include a better understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms leading to inflammation and organ failures, the development of specific treatments for the disease and personalized treatment approaches. Herein, we reviewed the current knowledge and future perspectives on mechanisms and treatment of ACLF.

Acute alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) is a syndrome that occurs in heavy and long-term drinkers and results in severe jaundice and liver failure. The mortality rate in severe cases is 20%-50% at 28 days, and in cases that do not improve despite appropriately timed corticosteroid therapy, the mortality rate reaches 70% at 6 months. The only curative treatment is early liver transplantation, but less than 2% of patients with severe AH are eligible. In order to improve the prognosis, diagnostic tools are needed to detect appropriate cases at risk of severe conditions, and new therapies need to be developed that can replace corticosteroids. Recent research has revealed that the pathogenesis of AH involves a complex of factors, including changes in the gut microbiota, inflammatory and cytokine signalling, oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, and abnormalities in the hepatic regenerative capacity. Non-invasive diagnostic tools focusing on these specific pathologies have been reported in recent years. In addition, several novel agents targeting specific pathways are currently being developed and tested in clinical trials. This review will provide an overview of alcohol-associated hepatitis and focus on the latest diagnostic tools, particularly non-invasive biomarkers, and novel therapies.

Various prognostic scores have been developed to predict mortality and response to steroids in alcoholic hepatitis (AH). We aimed to further validate and compare these scores, particularly pre-day 7 Lille scores, in addition to identifying reliable predictors of complications and mortality such as renal dysfunction and nutritional status.

To identify predictors of complications and mortality in AH, particularly focusing on demographics, renal involvement, underlying liver disease, and nutrition.

This is a retrospective analysis of patients admitted to a large urban tertiary care center with AH from 2020 to 2022. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to compare established prognostic scores with Lille scores from day 3 to day 7 (LM3-7). Logistic regression equations were conducted to identify predictor variables.

Severe AH (SAH) as defined by Maddrey's discriminant function ≥ 32 was diagnosed in 150 out of 425 patients with AH. LM3-7 had 28-day mortality rates in the responder group of 7%-11%, while in the non-responder group, mortality rates were approximately 38%-42%. LM3-7 had 90-day mortality rates in the responder group of 12% to 17%, while in the non-responder group, mortality rates were 48%-53%. Furthermore, all LM3-7 scores showed comparable efficacy in predicting mortality using ROC curve analysis; Area under ROC ranged from 0.771 to 0.802 for 28-day mortality and 0.743 to 0.809 for 90-day mortality. Regarding complications and mortality in AH, significant predictors included poor nutritional status, underlying cirrhosis, and acute renal dysfunction.

LM3-6 is as accurate as LM7 in predicting corticosteroid efficacy for 28-day and 90-day mortality in patients with SAH. Holding glucocorticoids early during the disease course can prevent unnecessary complications.

Alcohol consumption is a leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality worldwide and the primary cause of advanced liver disease. Alcohol use disorder is a chronic, frequently relapsing condition characterized by persistent alcohol consumption despite its negative consequences. Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) encompasses a series of stages, from fatty liver (steatosis) to inflammation (steatohepatitis), fibrosis, and, ultimately, liver cirrhosis and its complications. The development of ALD is complex, involving both genetic and environmental factors, yet the exact mechanisms at play remain unclear. Alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), a severe form of ALD, presents with sudden jaundice and liver failure. Currently, there are no approved targeted therapies able to interfere in the pathogenesis of ALD to stop the progression of the disease, making alcohol abstinence the most effective way to improve prognosis across all stages of ALD. For patients with advanced ALD who do not respond to medical therapy, liver transplantation is the only option that can improve prognosis. Recently, AH has become an early indication for liver transplantation in non-responders to medical treatment, showing promising results in carefully selected patients. This review provides an update on the epidemiology, natural history, pathogenesis, and current treatments for ALD. A deeper insight into novel targeted therapies investigated for AH focusing on new pathophysiologically-based agents is also discussed, including anti-inflammatory and antioxidative stress drugs, gut-liver axis modulators, and hepatocyte regenerative molecules.

Alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) frequently triggers acute decompensation (AD) in cirrhosis, with severe AH linked to high short-term mortality, especially in acute-on-chronic liver failure. Current corticosteroid treatments have limited efficacy, highlighting the need for new therapies. We hypothesized that severe AH outcomes are influenced by early specialized care; thus, we examined the impact of time-to-tertiary care (TTTc).

Adults with cirrhosis or advanced chronic liver disease were enrolled (RH7, NCT04767945). AH was diagnosed using National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism criteria. Primary admission site, TTTc, and adverse outcomes (death or liver transplantation) were analyzed. Patients admitted directly to tertiary care were assigned a TTTc of zero.

Of 221 AD-AH patients, 107 were transferred from secondary care to tertiary care (TTTc >0) and 114 were admitted directly (TTTc = 0). TTTc >0 patients were younger (48.3 vs. 52 years, P = .008) and had more severe disease, as shown by model for end-stage liver disease scores (25.5 vs. 20.8, P < .001) and Maddrey's discriminant function (59.3 vs. 40.6, P < .001). Propensity-score matching yielded 49 case pairs. The Cox model showed that transfer from secondary care was not associated with increased risk, but delayed transfer (days, hazard ratio = 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.05) independently predicted adverse outcomes.

Delayed initiation of specialized care adversely impacts outcomes in AD-AH. If validated, timely care bundles could improve AH survival, similar to sepsis or vascular syndromes.

AD-AH is a common syndrome associated with high short-term mortality. There is an unmet need for new prognosis-modifying therapies for AH. Currently, in real-life hepatology, refining the existing bundle of care is the only practical option to improve the prognosis of AD-AH. Past experience with acute coronary syndromes, stroke, and sepsis, emphasizing symptoms-to-intervention duration, combined with the recent COVID-19 lockdown finding of increased mortality due to skewed access to specialized liver care indicates that focusing on timely specialized care might be key to improved outcome in certain liver conditions. In this line, we set out to track the number of days elapsing between admission to SC and referral to TC, coining this interval as "time-to-tertiary care" (TTTc). We examined TTTc as a potential compound surrogate that might influence the prognosis in AD-AH. After correcting for important baseline differences, we conclude that the delay of transfer to the tertiary care hospital was independently associated with a worse prognosis with each additional day in TTTc increasing adverse outcomes by nearly 3%.

Severity scores, including the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and discriminant function score, guide the treatment of patients with severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH). We aimed to investigate the impact of functional status on outcomes of patients with AH.

Medically managed patients (n = 133) with AH from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2022 were included in this prospective study. The objectives were to compare the long-term survival, recompensation rates, corticosteroid response, incidence of infections, hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and acute kidney injury (AKI) among propensity score-matched patients with good Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (score ≥50) and poor KPS (score <50) using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Twenty-five patients with good KPS were matched with 25 patients with poor KPS and followed up for a median duration of 10 (0.5-33) months. Survival was 76% (19/25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 54.9-90.6) in patients with good KPS compared to 42.3% (11/25; 95% CI, 23.4-63.1) patients with poor KPS (P = 0.001) at 10 months. The recompensation rate was higher in the good KPS group than in the poor KPS group (68% vs 44%; P = 0.04). A higher proportion of patients in the good KPS group (78.9%) than in the poor KPS group (42.8%; P = 0.03) responded to corticosteroids. Survival was lower among non-responders in the poor KPS group (0% vs 75%; P = 0.01). The proportion of patients who developed infection (36% vs 28%; P = 0.051), HE (36% vs 12%; P = 0.01) and AKI (60% vs 16%; P < 0.001) was higher in patients with poor KPS than in good KPS.

KPS is an important determinant of outcomes in patients with AH, including survival, recompensation, response to corticosteroids and complications.

Corticosteroids are recommended by multiple society guidelines for the treatment of severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH). However, their use remains controversial due to inconsistent studies regarding their survival benefit.

This was a retrospective cohort study of first-time hospitalizations for severe AH (Maddrey discriminant function ≥ 32) admitted to the Veterans Health Administration between January 3, 2005, and December 5, 2020, (i) evaluating the effect of corticosteroid therapy on all-cause survival, (ii) characterizing the clinical and psychosocial factors associated with corticosteroid use, and (iii) determining the effect of duration of corticosteroid therapy on all-cause survival among treatment-responsive patients (Lille score < 0.45).

During the study period, 2,618 patients were admitted with severe AH, of whom 1,083 (41.37%) received corticosteroids. Although corticosteroids were significantly associated with improved all-cause survival in the unadjusted model ( P = 0.022), no survival benefit was observed in the adjusted model after accounting for baseline and admission characteristics (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.01, P = 0.818). Psychiatry consultation was the only factor evaluated that was protective against mortality (aHR = 0.67, P < 0.001). Among the 428 patients (49.7%) responsive to corticosteroids, duration of therapy was not associated with overall survival on unadjusted ( P = 0.696) or adjusted models (aHR = 1.12, P = 0.710 for a ≥28-day course compared with a ≤7-day reference).

Despite being recommended by clinical guidelines for severe AH, corticosteroids have low utilization with no survival benefit after accounting for differences in patient characteristics and practice patterns. Among patients with treatment response per the Lille score, no difference was observed in overall survival between shorter and longer durations of corticosteroid therapy.

Alcohol-associated hepatitis, considered a severe form of alcohol-associated liver disease, carries with it multiple negative health outcomes ranging not only to increased hospitalizations but also increased rates of mortality. While the inpatient management remains critical in optimizing clinical outcomes, a shift in focus to the outpatient management of alcohol-associated hepatitis is warranted as a long-term solution to this emerging health pandemic. Here, we review the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and current prognostication scoring systems for alcohol-associated hepatitis. We then offer a multimodal approach to the continued management of alcohol-associated hepatitis in the outpatient setting encompassing not only nutritional optimization, alcohol use disorder treatment, and the medical management of chronic liver disease, but also briefly review the current trend of the use of liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation (LT) is an established life-saving procedure. The field of LT has changed in the past 10 years from several perspectives, with the expansion of indications, transplantation of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure, evolution of transplant oncology, the use of donations after cardiac death, new surgical techniques, and prioritisation of recipients on the waiting list. In addition, the advent of organ perfusion machines, the recognition of new forms of rejection, and the attention paid to the transition from paediatric to adult patients, have all improved the management of LT recipients. The purpose of the EASL guidelines presented here is not to cover all aspects of LT but to focus on developments since the previous EASL guidelines published in 2016.

The large and growing burden of alcohol-associated liver disease-and the considerable burden of morbidity and mortality associated with it-has been a drive toward ongoing research into novel strategies for its treatment, with a particular focus upon alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH). Management of alcohol-use disorder forms the central pillar of alcohol-associated liver disease care, with evidence-based psychological and pharmacological approaches being well established, and certain models demonstrating improved clinical outcomes when hepatology and addiction services are co-located. Corticosteroids have previously been used somewhat indiscriminately in patients with severe AH, but effective tools now exist to assess early response (and limit futile ongoing exposure). Techniques to predict risk of corticosteroid-related infection are also available, although current clinical strategies to mitigate this risk are limited. A variety of novel therapeutic approaches to AH are at different phases of trials and evidence gathering, with some of the most promising signals related to cytokine manipulation, epigenetic modulation, and targeting of the gut microbiota (ie, by means of fecal microbiota transplant). While remaining an ongoing source of debate, early liver transplant in severe AH has grown in interest and acceptability over the past decade as evidence supporting its efficacy builds, in the process challenging paradigms about mandatory pretransplant sobriety periods. However, uncertainty remains regarding the optimal selection criteria, and whether liver transplant has a role for only a highly limited proportion of patients with AH or more widespread application. This review aims to provide an overview of this fast-moving field.

Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and a leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) in many countries, including the United States. However, LT for ALD is a complex and evolving field with ethical, social, and medical challenges. Thus, it requires a multidisciplinary approach and individualized decision-making. Short-term and long-term patient and graft survival of patients undergoing LT for ALD are comparable to other indications, but there is a continued need to develop better tools to identify patients who may benefit from LT, improve the pretransplant and posttransplant management of ALD, and evaluate the impact of LT for ALD on the organ donation and transplantation systems. In this review, we summarize the current evidence on LT for ALD, from alcohol-associated hepatitis to decompensated alcohol-associated cirrhosis. We discuss the indications, criteria, outcomes, and controversies of LT for these conditions and highlight the knowledge gaps and research priorities in this field.

Alcohol consumption is a global phenomenon and a major contributor to alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD). Detecting individuals at risk of ALD has been challenging, with only a small fraction of patients being identified at early stages compared to other chronic liver diseases. In response to this challenge, non-invasive tests (NITs) have become essential tools for the detection of ALD, offering opportunities for early identification and intervention to mitigate the disease burden. Noninvasive alcohol consumption biomarkers are crucial in estimating individuals' recent alcohol intake, providing valuable insights into their drinking patterns. Various NITs have been investigated for the initial screening of asymptomatic individuals at risk of ALD, as well as for identifying specific stages of the disease. These NITs are applied in 2 main clinical scenarios: population-based stratification for identifying and predicting liver-related symptoms and diagnosing and prognosticating compensated cirrhosis or advanced chronic liver disease in secondary or tertiary care settings. Moreover, NITs play a significant role in the prognostic assessment of patients with various manifestations of ALD, including alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), decompensated cirrhosis, and metabolic-associated and ALD. These tests guide appropriate treatment decisions and predict outcomes. In this review, various NITs for the early detection and monitoring of alcohol consumption were discussed. Additionally, the evaluation of NITs for screening and predicting ALD and liver complications was addressed comprehensively. Future perspectives of NITs for ALD were explored, alongside a thorough discussion of the opportunities and challenges associated with NITs for ALD screening.

Severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (SAH) is the most critical, acute, inflammatory phenotype within the alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) spectrum, characterized by high 30- and 90-day mortality. Since several decades, corticosteroids (CS) are the only approved pharmacotherapy offering highly limited survival benefits. Contextually, there is an evident demand for 3PM innovation in the area meeting patients' needs and improving individual outcomes. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has emerged as one of the new potential therapeutic options. In this study, we aimed to address the crucial 3PM domains in order to assess (i) the impact of FMT on mortality in SAH patients beyond CS, (ii) to identify factors associated with the outcome to be improved (iii) the prediction of futility, (iv) prevention of suboptimal individual outcomes linked to increased mortality, and (v) personalized allocation of therapy.

We conducted a prospective study (NCT04758806) in adult patients with SAH who were non-responders (NR) to or non-eligible (NE) for CS between January 2018 and August 2022. The intervention consisted of five 100 ml of FMT, prepared from 30 g stool from an unrelated healthy donor and frozen at - 80 °C, administered daily to the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. We evaluated the impact of FMT on 30- and 90-day mortality which we compared to the control group selected by the propensity score matching and treated by the standard of care; the control group was derived from the RH7 registry of patients hospitalized at the liver unit (NCT04767945). We have also scrutinized the FMT outcome against established and potential prognostic factors for SAH - such as the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), Maddrey Discriminant Function (MDF), acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), Liver Frailty Index (LFI), hepatic venous-portal pressure gradient (HVPG) and Alcoholic Hepatitis Histologic Score (AHHS) - to see if the 3PM method assigns them a new dimension in predicting response to therapy, prevention of suboptimal individual outcomes, and personalized patient management.

We enrolled 44 patients with SAH (NR or NE) on an intention-to-treat basis; we analyzed 33 patients per protocol for associated factors (after an additional 11 being excluded for receiving less than 5 doses of FMT), and 31 patients by propensity score matching for corresponding individual outcomes, respectively. The mean age was 49.6 years, 11 patients (33.3%) were females. The median MELD score was 29, and ACLF of any degree had 27 patients (81.8%). FMT improved 30-day mortality (p = 0.0204) and non-significantly improved 90-day mortality (p = 0.4386). Univariate analysis identified MELD ≥ 30, MDF ≥ 90, and ACLF grade > 1 as significant predictors of 30-day mortality, (p = 0.031; p = 0.014; p = 0.034). Survival was not associated with baseline LFI, HVPG, or AHHS.

In the most difficult-to-treat sub-cohort of patients with SAH (i.e., NR/NE), FMT improved 30-day mortality. Factors associated with benefit included MELD ≤ 30, MDF ≤ 90, and ACLF < 2. These results support the potential of gut microbiome as a therapeutic target in the context of 3PM research and vice versa - to use 3PM methodology as the expedient unifying template for microbiome research. The results allow for immediate impact on the innovative concepts of (i) personalized phenotyping and stratification of the disease for the clinical research and practice, (ii) multilevel predictive diagnosis related to personalized/precise treatment allocation including evidence-based (ii) prevention of futile and sub-optimally effective therapy, as well as (iii) targeted prevention of poor individual outcomes in patients with SAH. Moreover, our results add to the existing evidence with the potential to generate new research along the SAH's pathogenetic pathways such as diverse individual susceptibility to alcohol toxicity, host-specific mitochondrial function and systemic inflammation, and the role of gut dysbiosis thereof.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-024-00381-5.

Early liver transplantation for severe alcohol-associated hepatitis represents a transformative therapeutic approach that can significantly improve survival and achieves standard survival after LT compared to other indications. Early evaluation and an adequate selection of candidates, including organic and psychosocial criteria, are essential. Multidisciplinary management, including the addiction team for the treatment of alcohol use disorder, decreases the risk of alcohol relapse after liver transplantation and is associated with improved outcomes.

Bilirubin, the primary breakdown product of hemoproteins, particularly hemoglobin, plays a key role in the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of liver diseases. In acute liver diseases, such as acute liver failure, drug-induced liver injury, and viral hepatitis, bilirubin serves as a biomarker reflecting the extent of hepatocyte loss and liver damage. Chronic liver diseases, including alcohol-related liver disease, chronic hepatitis C virus infection, metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease, and autoimmune liver diseases, are marked by persistent liver injury and inflammation. Bilirubin levels in chronic liver diseases provide insight into liver function, disease severity, and prognosis. As a versatile biomarker, bilirubin offers valuable information on the pathophysiology of liver diseases and aids in guiding clinical decision-making regarding the treatment of liver diseases and their complications. This review aimed to explore the multifunctional role of bilirubin in liver diseases by analyzing its biological functions beyond its role as a biomarker of liver damage.

Unconjugated bilirubin (UCB) is a byproduct of the heme group that indicates irregularities in the metabolism of several important biological molecules, such as hemoglobin. UCB is processed by hepatic UGT1A1, which catalyzes its conjugation to the metabolites bilirubin diglucuronide (BDG) and bilirubin monoglucuronide (BMG). The serum concentrations of BDG and BMG may indicate liver injury or dysfunction. The aim of this study was to standardize and validate a method for the identification and simultaneous quantification of BMG, BDG and UCB by LC‒MS/MS.

Liquid‒liquid extraction allows the separation of UCB, BMG and BDG from the serum of healthy subjects or patients with liver injury. Detection and quantification were performed using an LC‒MS/MS method. Compound separation was achieved with a BEH-C18 column at 40°C. The mobile phase was prepared with 5 mM ammonium acetate (pH 6) and acetonitrile, and a flow gradient was applied.

This is the first study to directly quantify BMG and UCB levels in human serum; no postcalculations or correction factors are needed. However, BDG quantification requires calculations and a correction factor. We identified the molecular species with ionic transitions m/z1+ 585.4 > 299.2 for UCB, 761.3 > 475.3 for BMG, 937.3 > 299.5 for BDG and mesobilirubin 589.4 > 301.3 (IS).

The procedures used in this study allowed the simultaneous identification and quantification of the molecular species of bilirubin, BDG, BMG and UCB. Analysis of the serum levels in patients with hyperbilirubinemia revealed that patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure had elevated levels of these species.

Alcohol-associated hepatitis is an extreme form of alcohol-related liver disease associated with high short-term mortality. Currently, there are no authorized therapies for the treatment of severe alcohol-associated hepatitis. Important diagnostic steps for alcohol-associated hepatitis include recognizing the presence of an alcohol use disorder, distinguishing alcohol-related liver disease from metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, ruling out alternative causes of acute hepatitis, confirming the diagnosis with validated criteria or a liver biopsy, and using the model for end-stage liver disease score to predict clinical outcome and initiate therapy. Due to the lack of other effective therapy options, corticosteroids continue to be used as initial treatment for patients with severe alcohol-associated hepatitis. Patients who do not improve while on steroid treatment and are ideal candidates should be considered for curative liver transplantation as soon as possible. Avoiding unnecessary and ineffective pharmacological and interventional therapy can help to keep costs down. If a patient is not a good candidate for a transplant or is rapidly deteriorating in health due to a condition such as acute or chronic liver failure, a salvage/bridge to transplant should be pursued through enrolment in a clinical trial program. The role of healthy donor stool transplant and targeted bacteriophage therapy seems promising, pending prospective controlled trials.

Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is a significant global health challenge, encompassing a spectrum from steatotic liver disease to cirrhosis and alcohol-associated hepatitis, and contributed to 25% of global cirrhosis deaths in 2019. The identification of both modifiable (e.g. heavy drinking, metabolic syndromes) and non-modifiable risk factors (e.g. genetic predispositions) is crucial for effective disease management. Alcohol use assessment and treatment, by using both behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapeutic modalities, nutrition support, and optimization of liver disease modifiers, form the cornerstone of management. Advances in medical therapies, such as fecal microbiota transplantation and novel agents such as IL-22, are being explored for their therapeutic potential. A unifying theme in ALD care is the need for a personalized approach to management, accounting for the spectrum of the disease and individual patient characteristics, to tailor interventions effectively. Finally, it is essential to address the challenges to effective ALD treatment, including socioeconomic, logistical, and stigma-related barriers, to improve patient outcomes. This review discusses the current knowledge on ALD, including epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, and management strategies, highlighting the critical role of integrated care models.

Alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) mortality and risk factors have not been carefully studied in real-world settings. We examined the rate, temporal trend, and risk factors of mortality in AH.

We conducted a cohort study of individuals with AH diagnoses using medical claims data from Optum's Clinformatics® Data Mart (CDM). Participants were individuals covered by Medicare Advantage and commercial insurance policies. Cases were identified using diagnostic codes. Cox regressions were used to estimate 90 and 180-day mortality rates by hospitalization status.

The cohort included 32,001 patients (72% men) who had at least one year of continuous insurance coverage prior to AH diagnoses. Of these, 20,912 were hospitalized within seven days of diagnosis. Ninety and 180-day mortality rates were 12.0% (95% CI [11.6%, 12.5%]) and 16.0% (95% CI [15.4%, 16.5%]), respectively, for the hospitalized patients and 3.1% (95% CI [2.8%, 3.4%]) and 5.1% (95% CI [4.6%, 5.5%]) for the non-hospitalized patients. Pre-existing liver disease, even in a mild form, was associated with an increased risk of death. In hospitalized patients, a history of mild liver disease was associated with a 24% increase in 180-day mortality risk (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: [1.14, 1.36]). Moderate-to-severe liver disease was associated with a more than doubled risk (HR = 2.33, 95% CI: [2.12, 2.56]).

History of liver disease was associated with significantly increased AH mortality. The finding highlights the chronic disease context of AH and suggests that prior diagnosis of liver disease should be considered for prognosis and targeted prevention.

Patients with alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) consume large amounts of empty calories and are at risk for malnutrition. Malnutrition can present with micro- or macro-nutrient deficiencies. The standard-of-care drug treatment for severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) is corticosteroids. While still in the standard treatment there are limitations in efficacy and certain patients do not respond to treatment (Lille score ≥.45). This article will focus on important concepts related to nutrition and ALD and on recent findings on predicting corticosteroid response and prognosis for AH patients.

Alcohol-associated liver disease is a well-validated indication for liver transplantation and recent data have refined the patterns of alcohol consumption and their impact on the pre-LT and post-LT periods. The selection process is a multidisciplinary approach that integrates liver and addiction parameters. The present review analyzes the drivers of outcome and alcohol relapse and focuses on the changing paradigm in terms of access to the waiting list.

Alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) poses significant short-term mortality. Existing prognostic models lack precision for 90-day mortality. Utilizing artificial intelligence in a global cohort, we sought to derive and validate an enhanced prognostic model.

The Global AlcHep initiative, a retrospective study across 23 centers in 12 countries, enrolled patients with AH per National Institute for Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism criteria. Centers were partitioned into derivation (11 centers, 860 patients) and validation cohorts (12 centers, 859 patients). Focusing on 30 and 90-day postadmission mortality, 3 artificial intelligence algorithms (Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Machines, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting) informed an ensemble model, subsequently refined through Bayesian updating, integrating the derivation cohort's average 90-day mortality with each center's approximate mortality rate to produce posttest probabilities. The ALCoholic Hepatitis Artificial INtelligence Ensemble score integrated age, gender, cirrhosis, and 9 laboratory values, with center-specific mortality rates. Mortality was 18.7% (30 d) and 27.9% (90 d) in the derivation cohort versus 21.7% and 32.5% in the validation cohort. Validation cohort 30 and 90-day AUCs were 0.811 (0.779-0.844) and 0.799 (0.769-0.830), significantly surpassing legacy models like Maddrey's Discriminant Function, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease variations, age-serum bilirubin-international normalized ratio-serum Creatinine score, Glasgow, and modified Glasgow Scores ( p < 0.001). ALCoholic Hepatitis Artificial INtelligence Ensemble score also showcased superior calibration against MELD and its variants. Steroid use improved 30-day survival for those with an ALCoholic Hepatitis Artificial INtelligence Ensemble score > 0.20 in both derivation and validation cohorts.

Harnessing artificial intelligence within a global consortium, we pioneered a scoring system excelling over traditional models for 30 and 90-day AH mortality predictions. Beneficial for clinical trials, steroid therapy, and transplant indications, it's accessible at: https://aihepatology.shinyapps.io/ALCHAIN/ .