Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2017; 9(2): 61-67
Published online Feb 27, 2017. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i2.61
Table 1 Patient demographics
FL-HCC (n = 22)
Median age, years (range)29 yr (21 to 58)
Male/female11/11 (50%:50%)
Hepatitis or cirrhosis2 (9%)
Elevated AFP (> 200 ng/mL)2 (9%)
Table 2 Tumor characteristics’ and treatment features n (%)
FL-HCC (n = 22 )
Number
Single19 (86)
Multiple3 (14)
Size (cm)Median 12 cm (range, 5-20 )
Location9 right, 10 left, 3 bilateral
Hepatic resection
Hepatectomy16 (73)
Extended hepatectomy4 (18)
Localized resection2 (9)
Stage
I10 (45)
II5 (23)
III7 (32)
IV0
Nodal metastases4 (18)
Vascular invasion5 (23)
Positive safety margin2 (9)
Repeated hepatectomy4 (18)
Table 3 Clinicopathologic features and survival in fibrolamellar carcinoma (figures in parenthesis reflect percentages)
Factorn (%)Overall survival (mo)P value
Age (yr)
< 4016 (73)86
≥ 406 (27)720.4
Gender
Female11 (50)84
Male11 (50)790.6
Tumor size (cm)
< 108 (36)82
≥ 1014 (64)760.3
Number
119 (86)89
> 13 (14)770.2
Hepatic resection
Hepatectomy16 (73)86
Extended hepatectomy4 (18)77
Localized resection2 (9)790.62
Nodal metastases
Negative18 (82)88
Positive4 (18)780.09
Vascular invasion
Absent17 (77)92
Present5 (23)580.03
Safety margin
Negative20 (91)87
Positive2 (9)720.08
Table 4 Published series on fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma
Ref.nAgeMale:femaleCirrhosis/ hepatitisAFP elevatedMedian size (cm)> 1 tumorPositive nodeVascular invasionInitial operationRepeat operationMedian f/u5 yr survivalPrognostic factor
Hemming et al[18], 1997103150:50NR10%820%20%NRPhx 100%50%10170%NR
El-Gazzaz et al[19], 2000202765:350% hep B0%1420%30%55%Phx 55% OLT 45%NR2550%NONE
Kakar et al[20], 2005202753:270%3/13 (23%)< 10 31% ≥ 10 69%10%35%NRPhx 100%NRNR62%Metastasis at presentation
Stipa et al[21], 2006282843:570%7%911%50%36%Phx 100%61%3476%Positive LN
Present study222950:509%/hepc9%1213%18%23%Phx 100%18%4265%Vascular invasiom