Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2015; 7(8): 138-144
Published online Aug 27, 2015. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v7.i8.138
Table 1 Comparison of the studies
Ref.IRE placement techniqueNo. of patientsAge in yearsSex in male/femaleTime from diagnosis to treatment in monthsSurvival time in monthsComplicationsNo. of patients with metastasisNo. of patients who received pre IRE chemo and or radiationNo. of patient who received post IRE chemo and or radiation
Martin et al[38]Open 52 (96%) lap 2 (4%)54Median 61 range 45-8023 male/21 femaleMedian 5.1 range 1-32Local PFS 14, distant PFS 15, and OS 2032 (59%)0 (0%)49 (90%)40 (73%)
Martin et al[43]Open 48 (100%)48Median 61 range 27-8126 male/22 female6 range 4-13OS 22 and PFS 1118 (38%)0 (0%)33 (69%)31 (65%)
Paiella et al[39]Open 10 (100%)10Median 665 male/5 femaleMean 9.2OS 7.52 (20%)0 (0%)10 (100%)3 (30%)
Narayanan et al[40]Perc CT guided 14 (100%)14Median 57 range 51-727 male/7 femaleMean 16.6 range 2.4-49.570% OS at 6 mo2 (14%)3 (21%)14 (100%)NP
Månsson et al[41]Perc US guided 5 (100%)5Median 65 range 46-893 male/2 femaleNP40% OS at 6 mo0 (0%)0 (0%)5 (100%)NP
Bagla et al[44]Perc US with CT confirm178MaleCTAlive at 6 moNoneNoneNoNo