Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2026; 18(11): 122614
Published online Nov 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.122614
Published online Nov 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.122614
Table 1 General patient information, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Data | Control group (n = 92) | Research group (n = 106) | χ2/t | P value |
| Sex | 0.604 | 0.437 | ||
| Male | 47 (51.09) | 60 (56.60) | ||
| Female | 45 (48.91) | 46 (43.40) | ||
| Age (years) | 55.86 ± 6.22 | 56.60 ± 8.42 | 0.694 | 0.488 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.90 ± 2.29 | 22.79 ± 2.38 | 0.330 | 0.742 |
| Mode of anesthesia | 2.214 | 0.137 | ||
| General anesthesia | 38 (41.30) | 55 (51.89) | ||
| Epidural anesthesia | 54 (58.70) | 51 (48.11) | ||
| Surgical technique | 1.409 | 0.494 | ||
| Gastroduodenostomy | 36 (39.13) | 42 (39.62) | ||
| Gastrojejunostomy | 27 (29.35) | 24 (22.64) | ||
| Roux-en-Y anastomosis | 29 (31.52) | 40 (37.74) | ||
| TNM staging | 1.164 | 0.281 | ||
| I-IIA | 28 (30.43) | 40 (37.74) | ||
| IIB-III | 64 (69.57) | 66 (62.26) | ||
| Surgical duration (hours) | 1.901 | 0.168 | ||
| < 4 | 37 (40.22) | 53 (50.00) | ||
| ≥ 4 | 55 (59.78) | 53 (50.00) |
Table 2 Clinical efficacy comparison, n (%)
| Efficacy | Control group (n = 92) | Research group (n = 106) | χ2 | P value |
| Marked effectiveness | 36 (39.13) | 55 (51.89) | ||
| Effectiveness | 32 (34.78) | 40 (37.74) | ||
| Ineffectiveness | 24 (26.09) | 11 (10.38) | ||
| Overall effectiveness | 68 (73.91) | 95 (89.62) | 8.353 | 0.004 |
Table 3 Symptom improvement across groups, median (interquartile range)
| GCSI | Control group (n = 92) | Research group (n = 106) | Z | P value |
| Nausea and vomiting (points) | ||||
| Before intervention | 2.00 (1.00, 3.00) | 2.00 (1.00, 4.00) | -1.405 | 0.160 |
| After intervention | 2.00 (1.00, 2.00) | 1.00 (1.00, 2.00) | -3.868 | < 0.001 |
| Stomach distension (points) | ||||
| Before intervention | 2.00 (1.00, 3.00) | 2.00 (1.75, 3.00) | -0.538 | 0.591 |
| After intervention | 1.00 (1.00, 2.00) | 1.00 (0.00, 1.00) | -5.929 | < 0.001 |
| Inability to eat a normal amount of food (points) | ||||
| Before intervention | 3.00 (2.00, 4.00) | 3.00 (2.00, 4.00) | -1.257 | 0.209 |
| After intervention | 3.00 (2.00, 3.75) | 2.00 (1.75, 3.00) | -2.096 | 0.036 |
| Inappetence (points) | ||||
| Before intervention | 2.00 (2.00, 3.00) | 2.00 (2.00, 3.00) | -0.172 | 0.863 |
| After intervention | 1.00 (1.00, 2.00) | 1.00 (1.00, 2.00) | -2.192 | 0.028 |
| Severe postprandial fullness (points) | ||||
| Before intervention | 2.00 (1.00, 2.00) | 2.00 (2.00, 2.00) | -1.533 | 0.125 |
| After intervention | 1.00 (1.00, 2.00) | 1.00 (0.75, 1.00) | -3.761 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Safety of two groups, n (%)
| Adverse reactions | Control group (n = 92) | Research group (n = 106) | χ2 | P value |
| Diarrhea | 1 (1.09) | 4 (3.77) | ||
| Abdominal pain | 2 (2.17) | 2 (1.89) | ||
| Headache/dizziness | 3 (3.26) | 4 (3.77) | ||
| Palpitations | 1 (1.09) | 3 (2.83) | ||
| Nausea | 3 (3.26) | 2 (1.89) | ||
| Total | 10 (10.87) | 15 (14.15) | 0.481 | 0.488 |
Table 5 Univariate analysis, n (%)
| Data | Ineffective group (n = 35) | Effective group (n = 163) | χ2 | P value |
| Sex | 0.117 | 0.733 | ||
| Male (n = 107) | 18 (51.43) | 89 (54.60) | ||
| Female (n = 91) | 17 (48.57) | 74 (45.40) | ||
| Age (years) | 4.888 | 0.027 | ||
| < 56 (n = 90) | 10 (28.57) | 80 (49.08) | ||
| ≥ 56 (n = 108) | 25 (71.43) | 83 (50.92) | ||
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 0.075 | 0.784 | ||
| < 23 (n = 89) | 15 (42.86) | 74 (45.40) | ||
| ≥ 23 (n = 109) | 20 (57.14) | 89 (54.60) | ||
| Anesthesia mode | 0.027 | 0.870 | ||
| General anesthesia (n = 93) | 16 (45.71) | 77 (47.24) | ||
| Epidural anesthesia (n = 105) | 19 (54.29) | 86 (52.76) | ||
| Surgical modality | 1.720 | 0.423 | ||
| Gastroduodenostomy (n = 78) | 16 (45.71) | 62 (38.04) | ||
| Gastrojejunostomy (n = 51) | 6 (17.14) | 45 (27.61) | ||
| Roux-en-Y anastomosis (n = 69) | 13 (37.14) | 56 (34.36) | ||
| TNM staging | 7.586 | 0.006 | ||
| I-IIA (n = 68) | 5 (14.29) | 63 (38.65) | ||
| IIB-III (n = 130) | 30 (85.71) | 100 (61.35) | ||
| Surgical duration (hours) | 4.888 | 0.027 | ||
| < 4 (n = 90) | 10 (28.57) | 80 (49.08) | ||
| ≥ 4 (n = 108) | 25 (71.43) | 83 (50.92) | ||
| Baseline nausea and vomiting (points) | 0.090 | 0.764 | ||
| < 2 (n = 55) | 9 (25.71) | 46 (28.22) | ||
| ≥ 2 (n = 143) | 26 (74.29) | 117 (71.78) | ||
| Baseline stomach distension (points) | 1.282 | 0.258 | ||
| < 2 (n = 55) | 7 (20.00) | 48 (29.45) | ||
| ≥ 2 (n = 143) | 28 (80.00) | 115 (70.55) | ||
| Baseline inability to eat a normal amount of food (points) | 0.011 | 0.916 | ||
| < 3 (n = 72) | 13 (37.14) | 59 (36.20) | ||
| ≥ 3 (n = 126) | 22 (62.86) | 104 (63.80) | ||
| Baseline inappetence (points) | 1.601 | 0.206 | ||
| < 2 (n = 46) | 11 (31.43) | 35 (21.47) | ||
| ≥ 2 (n = 152) | 24 (68.57) | 128 (78.53) | ||
| Baseline severe postprandial fullness (points) | 0.024 | 0.877 | ||
| < 2 (n = 53) | 9 (25.71) | 44 (26.99) | ||
| ≥ 2 (n = 145) | 26 (74.29) | 119 (73.01) | ||
| Baseline gastrin (ng/L) | 5.357 | 0.021 | ||
| < 88 (n = 95) | 23 (65.71) | 72 (44.17) | ||
| ≥ 88 (n = 103) | 12 (34.29) | 91 (55.83) | ||
| Baseline motilin (mg/L) | 10.886 | 0.001 | ||
| < 309 (n = 97) | 26 (74.29) | 71 (43.56) | ||
| ≥ 309 (n = 101) | 9 (25.71) | 92 (56.44) | ||
| Therapeutic regimen | 8.353 | 0.004 | ||
| Omeprazole (n = 92) | 24 (68.57) | 68 (41.72) | ||
| Omeprazole + cisapride (n = 106) | 11 (31.43) | 95 (58.28) |
Table 6 Multivariate analysis
| Variable | β | SE | Wald | P value | OR | 95%CI |
| Age (years) | 0.716 | 0.446 | 2.573 | 0.109 | 2.046 | 0.853-4.909 |
| TNM staging | 1.367 | 0.545 | 6.292 | 0.012 | 3.922 | 1.348-11.408 |
| Surgical duration (hours) | 0.747 | 0.451 | 2.741 | 0.098 | 2.110 | 0.872-5.106 |
| Baseline gastrin (ng/L) | -0.796 | 0.433 | 3.385 | 0.066 | 0.451 | 0.193-1.053 |
| Baseline motilin (mg/L) | -1.374 | 0.456 | 9.063 | 0.003 | 0.253 | 0.104-0.619 |
| Therapeutic regimen | -1.172 | 0.449 | 6.801 | 0.009 | 0.310 | 0.128-0.747 |
- Citation: Zhu SL, Gao Q, Liu Y, Cheng KP. Omeprazole-cisapride combination for gastroparesis following radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: An efficacy and safety analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(11): 122614
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i11/122614.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.122614