Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Aug 27, 2025; 17(8): 107228
Published online Aug 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.107228
Published online Aug 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.107228
Table 1 Patient demographics and baseline characteristics, n (%)
Preoperative variables | Technique | P value | |
DMPJ, n = 34 | BIPJ, n = 33 | ||
Age, years | 62 (57, 70) | 66 (59, 73) | 0.144 |
Gender, male | 21 (62) | 14 (42) | 0.158 |
BMI, kg/m2 | 23.02 ± 2.89 | 21.80 ± 3.48 | 0.124 |
Hypertension, yes | 12 (35) | 14 (42) | 0.549 |
Diabetes, yes | 7 (21) | 5 (15) | 0.562 |
Preoperative biliary drainage, yes | 0 (0) | 2 (6) | 0.239 |
Neoadjuvant therapy, yes | 6 (18) | 1 (3) | 0.105 |
White blood cells, × 109/L | 6.70 (5.03, 8.03) | 6.40 (5.30, 7.60) | 0.726 |
Hemoglobin, g/L | 122 ± 24 | 122 ± 19 | 0.967 |
Aspartate aminotransferase, U/L | 39 (20, 73) | 32 (21, 85) | 0.757 |
Alanine aminotransferase, U/L | 33 (22, 60) | 36 (24, 101) | 0.309 |
Total bilirubin, μmol/L | 15 (10, 64) | 19 (13, 159) | 0.229 |
Direct bilirubin, μmol/L | 3 (2, 18) | 2 (0, 88) | 0.591 |
Blood creatinine, μmol/L | 69 (57, 80) | 61 (55, 72) | 0.185 |
Blood urea nitrogen, mmol/L | 4.39 (3.60, 5.95) | 4.36 (3.35, 5.44) | 0.580 |
Serum albumin, g/L | 39.0 ± 4.4 | 36.9 ± 4.4 | 0.089 |
C-reactive protein | 6.1 (2.5, 33.7) | 7.7 (2.9, 25.8) | 0.763 |
Table 2 Risk factors for pancreatic fistula, n (%)
Variables | Technique | P value | |
DMPJ, n = 34 | BIPJ, n = 33 | ||
Pancreatic texture of remnant pancreas | 0.162 | ||
Soft | 26 (76) | 20 (61) | |
Hard | 8 (24) | 13 (39) | |
Main pancreatic duct size | 0.393 | ||
≤ 3 mm | 15 (44) | 18 (55) | |
> 3 mm | 19 (56) | 15 (45) | |
Pancreatic fistula risk classification | 0.447 | ||
A | 6 (18.2) | 5 (14.7) | |
B | 7 (21.2) | 3 (8.82) | |
C | 9 (27.3) | 14 (41.2) | |
D | 11 (33.3) | 12 (35.3) |
Table 3 Operative outcomes, n (%)
Variables | Technique | P value | |
DMPJ, n = 34 | BIPJ, n = 33 | ||
Operative time, minutes | 388 (341, 464) | 340 (310, 350) | 0.004 |
Intraoperative bleeding, mL | 200 (200, 275) | 200 (100, 200) | 0.431 |
Red blood cell transfusion | 100 (0, 400) | 0 (0, 100) | 0.062 |
Final pathological diagnosis | 0.452 | ||
Pancreatic cancer | 21 (62) | 18 (55) | |
Neuroendocrine tumor | 7 (21) | 1 (3) | |
Ampullary neoplasm | 1 (3) | 5 (15) | |
Duodenal cancer | 2 (6) | 5 (15) | |
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm | 3 (9) | 2 (6) | |
Pancreatic serous cystadenoma | 0 (0) | 1 (3) | |
Bile duct cancer | 0 (0) | 1 (3) |
Table 4 Postoperative complications, n (%)
Variables | Technique | P value | |
DMPJ, n = 34 | BIPJ, n = 33 | ||
Pancreatic fistula | 0.183 | ||
None | 10 (29) | 17 (52) | |
Biochemical leakage | 7 (21) | 6 (18) | |
Grade B | 15 (44) | 7 (21) | |
Grade C | 2 (6) | 3 (9) | |
Intra-abdominal hemorrhage, yes | 2 (6) | 3 (9) | 0.673 |
Intraabdominal abscess, yes | 1 (3) | 1 (3) | 1.000 |
Postoperative biliary fistula, yes | 0 (0) | 1 (3) | 0.493 |
Postoperative chylous fistula, yes | 6 (18) | 1 (3) | 0.105 |
Reoperation, yes | 2 (6) | 0 (0) | 0.493 |
Postoperative hospital stay, days | 18 (15, 27) | 18 (14, 22) | 0.400 |
Hospitalization costs, × 104 yuan | 1223 (1009, 1519) | 1028 (921, 1353) | 0.071 |
Mortality within 30 days | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.000 |
Table 5 Subgroup analysis of main pancreatic duct size, n (%)
Variables | Main pancreatic duct size (≤ 3 mm), n = 33 | Main pancreatic duct size (> 3 mm), n = 34 | ||||
DMPJ, n = 15 | BIPJ, n = 18 | P value | DMPJ, n = 19 | BIPJ, n = 15 | P value | |
Operative time, minutes | 380 (330, 450) | 340 (311, 345) | 0.031 | 410 (345, 488) | 340 (308, 403) | 0.066 |
Intraoperative bleeding, mL | 200 (150, 200) | 200 (100, 200) | 0.592 | 200 (200, 300) | 200 (100, 350) | 0.886 |
Red blood cell transfusion | 200 (0, 450) | 0 (0, 0) | 0.003 | 0 (0, 390) | 100 (0, 450) | 0.752 |
Pancreatic fistula | 0.817 | 0.090 | ||||
None | 4 (27) | 8 (44) | 6 (32) | 9 (60) | ||
Biochemical leakage | 3 (20) | 3 (17) | 4 (21) | 3 (20) | ||
Grade B | 7 (47) | 6 (33) | 8 (42) | 1 (7) | ||
Grade C | 1 (7) | 1 (6) | 1 (5) | 2 (13) | ||
Intra-abdominal hemorrhage, yes | 2 (13) | 1 (6) | 0.579 | 0 (0) | 2 (13) | 0.187 |
Intraabdominal abscess, yes | 1 (7) | 0 (0) | 0.455 | 0 (0) | 1 (7) | 0.441 |
Postoperative biliary fistula, yes | 0 (0) | 1 (6) | 1.000 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.000 |
Postoperative chylous fistula, yes | 3 (20) | 0 (0) | 0.083 | 3 (16) | 1 (7) | 0.613 |
Reoperation, yes | 1 (7) | 0 (0) | 0.455 | 1 (5) | 0 (0) | 1.000 |
Postoperative hospital stay, days | 18 (15, 29) | 18 (13, 24) | 0.246 | 17 (16, 23) | 18 (16, 21) | 0.945 |
Table 6 Subgroup analysis of pancreatic texture, n (%)
Variables | Pancreatic texture of remnant pancreas (soft), n = 46 | Pancreatic texture of remnant pancreas (hard), n = 21 | ||||
DMPJ, n = 26 | BIPJ, n = 20 | P value | DMPJ, n = 8 | BIPJ, n = 13 | P value | |
Operative time, minutes | 403 (351, 469) | 335 (300, 345) | 0.001 | 365 (301, 421) | 340 (325, 395) | 0.856 |
Intraoperative bleeding, mL | 200 (200, 300) | 100 (100, 200) | 0.023 | 200 (50, 200) | 200 (200, 300) | 0.049 |
Red blood cell transfusion | 100 (0, 400) | 0 (0, 100) | 0.095 | 100 (0, 325) | 0 (0, 0) | 0.365 |
Pancreatic fistula | 0.817 | 0.090 | ||||
None | 6 (23) | 12 (60) | 4 (50) | 5 (38) | ||
Biochemical leakage | 5 (19) | 2 (10) | 2 (25) | 4 (31) | ||
Grade B | 13 (50) | 4 (20) | 2 (25) | 3 (23) | ||
Grade C | 2 (8) | 2 (10) | 0 (0) | 1 (8) | ||
Intra-abdominal hemorrhage, yes | 2 (8) | 2 (10) | 1.000 | 0 (0) | 1 (8) | 1.000 |
Intraabdominal abscess, yes | 1 (4) | 1 (5) | 1.000 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.000 |
Postoperative biliary fistula, yes | 0 (0) | 1 (5) | 0.435 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.000 |
Postoperative chylous fistula, yes | 4 (15) | 1 (5) | 0.369 | 2 (25) | 0 (0) | 0.133 |
Reoperation, yes | 2 (8) | 0 (0) | 0.498 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1.000 |
Postoperative hospital stay, days | 19 (16, 32) | 18 (16, 25) | 0.498 | 17.0 (14.8, 18.0) | 17.0 (13.0, 21.0) | 0.942 |
- Citation: Chen X, Wang CY, Fu RB, Liu ZY, Yin MQ, Zhu JH. Binding and interlocking pancreaticojejunostomy vs duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy: A retrospective cohort study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(8): 107228
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i8/107228.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i8.107228