Exploration of doctor-patient communication characteristics and optimization path for gastrointestinal surgery of acute abdomen

Table 1 Comparison of clinical data between the control and observation group characteristics, mean ± SD

	Control (n = 41)	Observation (n = 41)	P value
Gender
Male	22	21	> 0.05
Female	19	20
Age (years)	42.63 ± 5.66	42.57 ± 5.40	> 0.05
Time from onset to admission (hours)	10.46 ± 2.77	10.70 ± 2.42	> 0.05
Disease type
Appendicitis	16	17	> 0.05
Pancreatitis	18	19
Other	7	5

No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of sex, age, time from onset to admission, or disease type (P > 0.05).

Table 2 Comparison of treatment efficiency and effect between the two groups, mean ± SD

Group	Number of cases	Time to ambulation (hour)	Hospital stay duration (day)	Hospitalization costs (Chinese yuan)
Observation	41	13.25 ± 1.05	4.13 ± 0.56	2658.14 ± 49.88
Control	41	16.55 ± 1.40	5.78 ± 0.40	2677.46 ± 49.35
t value		12.074	15.352	1.763
P value		< 0.001	< 0.001	0.082

Table 3 Comparison of psychological status between the two groups, mean ± SD

Group	Cases	SAS		SDS
		Before	After	Before	After
Observation	41	54.05 ± 4.55	40.22 ± 3.77a	56.78 ± 4.03	41.35 ± 4.06a
Control	41	54.12 ± 4.43	42.63 ± 3.59a	56.29 ± 4.29	44.29 ± 4.57a
t value		0.071	2.964	0.533	3.080
P value		0.944	0.004	0.595	0.003

^aP < 0.05.

P compared with the pre-intervention session. SAS: Anxiety self-assessment scale; SDS: Depression self-assessment scale.

Table 4 Comparison of coping methods between the two groups, mean ± SD

Group	Cases	Face		Avoid		Surrender
		Before	After	Before	After	Before	After
Observation	41	15.78 ± 1.40	23.06 ± 1.73a	14.51 ± 1.24	10.77 ± 0.98a	13.06 ± 1.26	8.43 ± 0.77a
Control	41	15.46 ± 1.33	19.77 ± 1.44a	14.46 ± 1.30	12.14 ± 1.03a	13.17 ± 1.40	9.46 ± 0.84a
t value		1.061	9.359	0.178	6.170	0.374	5.788
P value		0.292	< 0.001	0.859	< 0.001	0.709	< 0.001

^aP < 0.05.

P compared with the pre-intervention session.

Table 5 Comparison of sleep quality between the two study groups, mean ± SD

Items	Times	Case	Observation	Control	t value	P value
Sleep time	Before	41	2.37 ± 0.45	2.44 ± 0.41	0.736	0.464
	After	41	1.36 ± 0.29a	1.77 ± 0.33a	5.976	< 0.001
Sleep quality	Before	41	2.40 ± 0.37	2.38 ± 0.32	0.262	0.794
	After	41	1.47 ± 0.29a	1.66 ± 0.38a	2.545	0.013
Hour of sleep	Before	41	1.89 ± 0.16	1.91 ± 0.18	0.532	0.596
	After	41	1.27 ± 0.22a	1.40 ± 0.27a	2.390	0.019
Sleep efficiency	Before	41	1.44 ± 0.20	1.46 ± 0.26	0.390	0.697
	After	41	0.81 ± 0.10a	0.98 ± 0.14a	6.327	< 0.001
Ambulatory medicine	Before	41	1.39 ± 0.22	1.40 ± 0.27	0.184	0.855
	After	41	0.74 ± 0.09a	0.88 ± 0.10a	6.663	< 0.001
Dyssomnia	Before	41	1.50 ± 0.20	1.51 ± 0.23	0.210	0.834
	After	41	1.03 ± 0.14a	1.19 ± 0.18a	4.493	< 0.001
Daytime function	Before	41	1.88 ± 0.26	1.90 ± 0.27	0.342	0.734
	After	41	1.13 ± 0.30a	1.29 ± 0.24a	2.667	0.009

^aP < 0.05.

P compared with the pre-intervention session.

Table 6 Comparison of compliance between the two groups, n (%)

Group	Case	Full compliance	Part of the compliance	No compliance at all	Compliance rate
Observation	41	22 (53.66)	18 (43.90)	1 (2.44)	40 (97.56)
Control	41	19 (46.34)	14 (34.15)	8 (19.51)	33 (80.49)
χ2 value					4.493
P value					0.034