Quality of care combined with mindfulness-based stress reduction intervention in patients undergoing arterial interventional embolization for liver tumors

Table 1 Comparison of psychological stress response levels between the two groups (mean ± SD, points)

Group	n	Individual attention to emotional experience		Differentiation of emotional experiences		Regulation of negative emotions
		Before	After	Before	After	Before	After
Control	42	20.69 ± 5.25	25.24 ± 5.39a	27.42 ± 5.31	32.59 ± 5.64a	17.09 ± 5.27	20.23 ± 5.35a
Observation	42	20.47 ± 5.13	28.52 ± 5.46a	27.60 ± 5.47	36.07 ± 5.76a	17.23 ± 5.30	23.32 ± 5.45a
t		0.194	2.771	0.153	2.798	0.121	2.622
P value		0.846	0.007	0.879	0.006	0.904	0.010

^aP < 0.05, specific values against the same group before intervention.

Table 2 Comparison of coping methods between the two groups (mean ± SD, points)

Group	n	Optimistic		Support		Self-dependence		Square up
		Before	After	Before	After	Before	After	Before	After
Control	42	17.48 ± 2.25	20.94 ± 2.47a	7.25 ± 2.16	9.75 ± 2.24a	18.23 ± 2.52	13.17 ± 2.31a	20.42 ± 2.19	24.67 ± 2.28a
Observation	42	17.64 ± 2.39	22.42 ± 2.50a	7.34 ± 2.21	11.12 ± 2.43a	18.37 ± 2.48	11.82 ± 2.25a	20.52 ± 2.24	26.03 ± 2.52a
t		0.316	2.729	0.189	2.686	0.257	2.713	0.207	2.594
P value		0.753	0.008	0.851	0.009	0.798	0.008	0.837	0.011

^aP < 0.05, compared with the same group before the intervention.

Table 3 Comparison of coping methods between the two groups (mean ± SD, points)

Group	n	Guard		Trust to luck		Feeling relief		Escape
		Before	After	Before	After	Before	After	Before	After
Control	42	16.24 ± 2.46	12.35 ± 2.28a	8.74 ± 1.43	6.09 ± 1.18a	7.89 ± 2.07	9.48 ± 2.24a	22.28 ± 2.61	18.36 ± 2.45a
Observation	42	16.31 ± 2.52	11.06 ± 2.19a	8.68 ± 1.37	5.42 ± 1.03a	7.92 ± 2.17	10.86 ± 2.42a	22.32 ± 2.50	16.90 ± 2.28a
t		0.129	2.644	0.196	2.772	0.065	2.712	0.072	2.827
P value		0.898	0.010	0.845	0.007	0.948	0.008	0.943	0.006

^aP < 0.05, compared with the same group before the intervention.

Table 4 Comparison of the quality of care between the two treatment groups (mean ± SD, score)

Group	n	Guarantee	Reactive mode	Caring	Reliability
Control	42	28.97 ± 5.45	27.06 ± 5.38	27.38 ± 5.19	9.09 ± 2.25
Observation	42	32.28 ± 5.36	30.32 ± 5.49	30.41 ± 5.26	10.41 ± 2.30
t		2.806	2.749	2.657	2.659
P value		0.006	0.007	0.009	0.009

Table 5 Comparison of nursing satisfaction between the two groups, n (%)

Group	Unsatisfied	Commonly	Satisfied	Degree of satisfaction
Control	9 (21.43)	17 (40.48)	16 (38.10)	33 (78.57)
Observation	2 (4.76)	17 (40.48)	23 (54.76)	40 (95.24)
Z	2.025
P value	0.042