Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2026; 18(11): 124019
Published online Nov 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.124019
Published online Nov 27, 2026. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.124019
Figure 1 Representative images showing minimally invasive catheter drainage technique.
A: Catheter placement; B: Irrigation and drainage.
Figure 2 Comparison of visual analogue scale scores between two groups (points).
ID: Incision and drainage with selective seton placement; MICD: Minimally invasive catheter drainage; VAS: Visual analogue scale.
Figure 3 Comparison of surgical indicators between two groups.
A: Operative time; B: Intraoperative blood loss; C: Wound healing time; D: Hospital stays. ID: Incision and drainage with selective seton placement; MICD: Minimally invasive catheter drainage.
- Citation: Ma KK, Chen HC, Lu YQ. Incision and drainage vs minimally invasive catheter drainage on pain and anal function in high perianal abscess patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(11): 124019
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i11/124019.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.124019