Immunosuppressive therapy for pediatric liver transplant recipients varies between institutions. We aim to compare outcomes associated with common induction agents and maintenance therapies.

A retrospective analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database was performed for pediatric liver transplant cases between 2010 and 2024. Graft failure, acute rejection, recipient mortality, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) and cytomegalovirus (CMV), hospitalization, and post-operative length of stay were collected. Rates of each outcome were compared for the most common induction (antithymocyte globulin [ATG], basiliximab/daclizumab, or no induction regimen [induction without depleting/nondepleting agents]) and maintenance therapies (calcineurin inhibitors [CI] alone, CI + steroids, CI + mycophenolate mofetil [MMF], or CI + MMF + steroids).

Of 6369 pediatric liver transplant recipients who met inclusion criteria, 1563 (24.5%) underwent induction with basiliximab/daclizumab, 639 (10.0%) with anti-thymocyte globulin, and 4167 (65.4%) with no induction. For maintenance therapy, 2854 (46.0%) patients received CI + steroids, 2309 (37.2%) CI + MMF + steroids, 695 (11.2%) CI alone, and 351 (5.7%) CI + MMF. ATG was associated with decreased risk of PTLD compared to no induction (HR = 2.028, p = 0.028) and basiliximab/daclizumab (HR = 2.158, p = 0.020). ATG was associated with lower mortality (HR = 0.634, p = 0.041). Acute rejection was decreased with no induction (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.820, p = 0.011). No other differences in graft failure, CMV, hospitalization, or length of initial stay were present between induction or maintenance therapies.

Induction with ATG is associated with decreased mortality and PTLD, though it is also associated with an increased risk of organ rejection. These results may support its use in the optimal induction regimen for pediatric liver transplantation.

Chile presents one of the lowest organ donation rates, resulting in pediatric liver waitlist mortality rates up to 38.1%. Live donor liver transplantation is one of the main alternatives to decrease waitlist mortality, mostly utilized in our country for small children up to 20 kg.

The aim of this study was to report a three-case series of adult-to-pediatric living donor liver transplantation using a full left lobe graft.

We report three cases of children with more than 20 kg who received complete left hemi-grafts in different clinical scenarios. The indications and techniques adopted are discussed.

Three children, two girls and one boy, aged 11, 7, and 3 years, were transplanted. The indications for transplant were fulminant hepatitis of autoimmune etiology, hepatoblastoma, and chronic liver failure due to autoimmune hepatitis, respectively. The evolution was satisfactory in all three children, and to date, all are well, approximately 12-24 months after the transplant.

The use of a living donor left lateral segment (segments 2 and 3) has been successfully employed in pediatric liver transplantation. However, it is only suitable for infants and low-weight children. This approach using the whole left hemi-liver graft contributes to the reduction of small-for-size syndrome, mortality rate, and waiting times associated with deceased donors.

The aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes of pediatric LT with left liver grafts, obtained either from a living donor (LD) or a split deceased donor (sDD).

Retrospective single-center study from 2002 to 2022. All pediatric LT with left liver grafts (not including middle hepatic vein) from LD or sDD were included. Reduced grafts were not included.

A total of 112 pediatric LT were performed: 58 with LD grafts and 54 with sDD grafts (17 split ex situ and 37 in situ). Donor characteristics were similar, apart from donor age (33 years in LD vs. 30 years in sDD, p = 0.03). Indications were similar with 55% biliary atresia in each group. Retransplantation was more frequently performed in the sDD group (2% vs. 15%, p = 0.01). Recipient age, weight, and PELD score at transplant were not significantly different between groups. Cold ischemia time was longer for sDD (158 min in LD vs. 390 min in sDD; p < 0.0001). Posttransplant peak ALT was higher with sDD grafts (1470 vs. 1063, p = 0.018), and hospital stay was longer with sDD grafts (27 vs. 21 days, p = 0.005). However, there was no difference between groups in terms of major morbidity (Dindo-Clavien grade ≥3), vascular and biliary complications, and 90-day mortality. Patient survival at 10 years was 93.1% for LD and 92.8% for sDD (p = 0.807). Graft survival at 10 years was 89.7% for LD and 83.1% for sDD (p = 0.813).

Technically similar LD and sDD grafts achieve very similar postoperative and long-term outcomes with excellent patient and graft survival.

Optimizing graft preservation is key for ex-situ split grafts in pediatric liver transplantation (PSLT). Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion (HOPE) improves ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and post-operative outcomes in adult LT. This study compares the use of HOPE in ex-situ partial grafts to static cold storage ex-situ partial grafts (SCS-Split) and to the gold standard living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). All consecutive HOPE-Split, SCS-Split and LDLT performed between 2018-2023 for pediatric recipients were included. Post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS, drop ≥30% in systolic arterial pressure) and reperfusion biopsies served as early indicators of IRI. We included 47 pediatric recipients (15 HOPE-Split, 17 SCS-Split, and 15 LDLT). In comparison to SCS-Split, HOPE-Split had a significantly shorter cold ischemia time (CIT) (470min vs. 538 min; p =0.02), lower PRS rates (13.3% vs. 47.1%; p = 0.04) and a lower IRI score (3 vs. 4; p = 0.03). The overall IRI score (3 vs. 3; p = 0.28) and PRS (13.3% vs. 13.3%; p = 1) after HOPE-Split were comparable to LDLT, despite a longer CIT (470 min vs. 117 min; p < 0.001). Surgical complications, one-year graft, and recipient survival did not differ among the groups. In conclusion, HOPE-Split mitigates early IRI in pediatric recipients in comparison to SCS-Split, approaching the gold standard of LDLT.

Multiple adult studies have investigated the role of older donors (ODs) in expanding the donor pool. However, the impact of donor age on pediatric liver transplantation (LT) has not been fully elucidated.

UNOS database was used to identify pediatric (≤18 years) LTs performed in the United States during 2002-22. Donors ≥40 years at donation were classified as older donors (ODs). Propensity analysis was performed with 1:1 matching for potentially confounding variables.

A total of 10,024 pediatric liver transplantation (PLT) patients met inclusion criteria; 669 received liver grafts from ODs. Candidates receiving OD liver grafts were more likely to be transplanted for acute liver failure, have higher Model End-Stage Liver Disease/Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD/PELD) scores at LT, listed as Status 1/1A at LT, and be in the intensive care unit (ICU) at time of LT (all p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier (KM) analyses showed that recipients of OD grafts had worse patient and graft survival (p < 0.001) compared to recipients of younger donor (YD) grafts. KM analyses performed on candidates matched for acuity at LT revealed inferior patient and graft survival in recipients of deceased donor grafts (p < 0.001), but not living donor grafts (p > 0.1) from ODs. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that living donor LT, diagnosis of biliary atresia and first liver transplant were favorable predictors of recipient outcomes, whereas ICU stay before LT and transplantation during 2002-12 were unfavorable.

Livers from ODs were used for candidates with higher acuity. Pediatric recipients of livers from ODs had worse outcome compared to YDs; however, living donor LT from ODs had the least negative impact on recipient outcomes.

Split and living donor liver transplantations are both key surgical strategies for development of pediatric liver transplant programs. Often, however, teams tend to prioritize only one preferentially.

In the context of a very active national split liver graft allocation program (Italy), retrospective study of 226 consecutive pediatric first isolated liver transplants performed by a single team using organs from both deceased and living donors. Clinical characterisitics and outcome were compared.

In the context of a steadily slowly decreasing split graft offer, living donation activity steadily increased. Deceased and living donation accounted for 52.6% and 47.4% of transplantations, respectively. Both strategies were equally used for transplanting patients up to 30 kg of weight, while deceased donors were predominantly used for older recipients. Technical variants represented 86% of all transplants, with 183 conisting of left lateral segment grafts (76 split liver grafts and 107 left grafts from living donors). Outcome of both surgical strategies was similar, with excellent outcomes at early, mid-, and long-term.

Splitting livers of deceased donors and using living donation were complementary and non-competitive strategies for developping pediatric liver transplant activity. Implementing both activities in parallell allowed to maintain stable the number of annual transplant in Italy and allowed to reach superior outcomes. This analysis provides evidence that living donation plays a role in Italy despite an existing very active "mandatory-split" national policy.

The field of pediatric organ transplantation has grown significantly in recent decades, with interventional radiology (IR) playing an essential role in managing pre and post-transplant complications. Pediatric transplant patients face unique challenges compared to adults, including donor-recipient size mismatch, and complications of a growing child with changing physiology. Interventional radiologists play a major role in pediatric renal and liver transplant. IR interventions begin early in the child's pretransplant journey, with diagnostic procedures such as biopsies, angiograms, and cholangiograms. These procedures are essential for understanding the etiology of organ failure and identifying potential transplant candidates. Minimally invasive therapeutic procedures may serve as bridges to transplant and may include vascular access optimization for hemodialysis, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) creation, and tumor embolization or ablation. After transplant, image-guided biopsies for the surveillance of graft rejection and treatment of vascular or luminal stenoses, pseudoaneurysms, and anastomotic leaks can maintain the function and longevity of the transplant organ. Careful consideration must be given to patient size and evolving anatomy, radiation exposure, and the need for deeper sedation for pediatric patients. Despite these challenges, the integration of IR in pediatric transplant care has proven beneficial, offering minimally invasive alternatives to surgery, faster recovery times, and improved outcomes.

The risk of early surgical complications of liver transplantation (LT) is higher in children when compared with adults. The aims of the present retrospective study from a single center cohort/single surgeon were to identify the predictive factors for surgical complications after pediatric LT.

All children receiving a first LT from October 1990 to October 2010 in our center were included.

Included 151 children (boys 55.0%), with a mean age of 4.8 ± 4.8 years, and a mean weight of 17.9 ± 14.4 kg. Thirty-seven patients were transplanted within the first year, and 59 patients had a body weight below 10 kg. The main initial liver disease was biliary atresia (49.0%). Living donor LT was performed in 39 cases (25.8%), cadaveric whole liver LT in 50 cases (33.1%), and cadaveric partial liver LT in 62 cases (41.1%). Early surgical complications included reoperation (37.8%), vascular complications (8.6%), i.e. arterial (3.3%) or portal thrombosis/stenosis (7.3%) within the first month, and biliary complications in the first 90 days occurred in 22.5% of the cases. The main indications for surgical revision were abdominal bleeding, treatment of a biliary complication, and bowel perforation. Multivariate analysis disclosed that only graft type (split and moreover from a living donor) was significantly and independently associated with the occurrence of biliary complication, and that indication for LT, period, graft type, and operative time were significantly and independently associated with the necessity of surgical revision.

Our results emphasize that surgical complications are frequent and strongly depend on patient/graft characteristics.

Biliary atresia (BA) remains the number one indication for paediatric liver transplantation (LT) worldwide but is an uncommon indication for older LT recipients. The impact of recent donor allocation changes, pervasive organ shortage and evolving LT practices on the BA LT population is unknown.

We identified patients who underwent LT between January 2010 and December 2021 using the UNOS database. We compared clinical outcomes between patients with BA and those with non-BA cholestatic liver disease. Groups were stratified by age, <12 years (allocated via PELD system) and ≥12 years (allocated via MELD system). Waitlist outcomes were compared using competing-risk regression analysis, graft survival rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analysis and Cox proportional hazards modelling provided adjusted estimates.

There were 2754 BA LT waitlist additions and 2206 BA LTs (1937 <12 years [younger], 269 ≥12 years [older]). There were no differences in waitlist mortality between BA and non-BA cholestatic patients. Among BA LT recipients, there were 441 (20.0%) living-donor liver transplantations (LDLT) and 611 (27.7%) split deceased-donor LTs. Five-year graft survival was significantly higher among BA versus non-BA cholestatic patients in the older group (88.3% vs. 79.5%, p < .01) but not younger group (89.3% vs. 89.5%). Among BA LT recipients, improved graft outcomes were associated with LDLT (vs. split LT: HR: 2, 95% CI: 1.03-3.91) and higher transplant volume (volume >100 vs. <40 BA LTs: HR: 3.41, 95% CI: 1.87-6.2).

Liver transplant outcomes among BA patients are excellent, with LDLT and higher transplant centre volume associated with optimal graft outcomes.

The outcomes of liver transplantation (LT) from different grafts have been studied individually and in combination, but the reports were conflicting with some researchers finding no difference in both short-term and long-term outcomes between the deceased donor split LT (DD-SLT) and living donor LT (LDLT).

To compare the outcomes of DD-SLT and LDLT we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review was performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The following databases were searched for articles comparing outcomes of DD-SLT and LDLT: PubMed; Google Scholar; Embase; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; and Reference Citation Analysis (https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/). The search terms used were: "liver transplantation;" "liver transplant;" "split liver transplant;" "living donor liver transplant;" "partial liver transplant;" "partial liver graft;" "ex vivo splitting;" and "in vivo splitting."

Ten studies were included for the data synthesis and meta-analysis. There were a total of 4836 patients. The overall survival rate at 1 year, 3 years and 5 years was superior in patients that received LDLT compared to DD-SLT. At 1 year, the hazard ratios was 1.44 (95% confidence interval: 1.16-1.78; P = 0.001). The graft survival rate at 3 years and 5 years was superior in the LDLT group (3 year hazard ratio: 1.28; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.63; P = 0.04).

This meta-analysis showed that LDLT has better graft survival and overall survival when compared to DD-SLT.

Pediatric liver transplant is an established life-saving procedure for children with end-stage liver diseases, achieving excellent graft and patient survival but with effects on quality of life and psychological welfare in the long-term. With the natural increase in the number of pediatric transplant patients becoming adults, it is essential to successfully plan and manage issues affecting late outcomes in the vulnerable pediatric transplant population. This study offers an overview of the long-term surgical complications, the consequences of immunosuppression (such as posttransplant diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and renal dysfunction), and the infection and malignancy risks. Finally, because quality of life is now an inclusive measurement of patient satisfaction, guidance on how to facilitate the transition to adulthood, empowering transplant recipients, is also provided.