Post-colonoscopy appendicitis is an infrequent complication of colonoscopy. This systematic review aimed to summarize the literature's current notions, clinical features, and management of post-colonoscopy appendicitis. PubMed and Embase were searched from inception until December 31, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full-text papers for any study design about post-colonoscopy appendicitis and abstracted data. 56 articles with a total of 67 patients were included in the systematic review. The median age was 54.9 years (range 24-84), with more male individuals affected (64.2 %). The main indication of colonoscopy was investigation (37.3 %). Forty-three patients had colonoscopy with additional procedures (64.2 %). Most patients (79.1 %) presented with symptoms within two days after the colonoscopy. The clinical manifestation was the same as acute appendicitis. The diagnosis of post-colonoscopy appendicitis was confirmed in 70.2 % of the cases, mainly with abdominal computed tomography or, alternatively, ultrasound. Most patients were successfully treated with surgery (88.1 %), either open (56.8 %) or laparoscopic appendectomy (31.3 %). The conversion rate of laparoscopic appendectomy was 19.2 %. Non-operative management with intravenous antibiotics was attempted in 17 patients with a success rate of 41.2 %. Histopathology revealed acute appendicitis in 30 cases (44.8 %) and complicated appendicitis in 29 (49.2 %). Fecalith was found in 21 cases (31.3 %). Post-colonoscopy appendicitis is an infrequent but potential complication of colonoscopy. The onset of symptoms, especially pain, fever, nausea, and vomiting after a colonoscopy, should raise suspicion of this entity. A satisfactory outcome depends on timely diagnosis and appropriate management.

Appendicitis after colonoscopy is an exceedingly rare complication. It remains to be explored if this entity is truly a complication of colonoscopy or a coincidental occurrence of appendicitis post-colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to systematically review all the available evidence since it was first described in 1988.

The literature on post-colonoscopy appendicitis was searched using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Additional manual search was performed and cross-checked for additional references. The search was performed up to November 2019. Data collected included demographics, reason for colonoscopy, time to diagnosis, imaging performed, management, and outcome.

Fifty-three cases were found in the systematic review with a median age of 55 years (24-84 years). The time to diagnosis post-colonoscopy was mostly within 24-48 h. Clinical features mimicked those of common acute appendicitis. In the past decade, computed tomography scan has been the imaging choice to investigate abdominal pain after colonoscopy, mainly to rule out perforation. The mainstay of management was appendectomy (open or laparoscopy). Four of the 12 cases (33.3%) were treated successfully with antibiotics alone. There has been a twofold increase in cases reported in the past decade (2009-2019, n = 31 vs 1999-2008, n = 15).

There is a considerable variation in the definition of post-colonoscopy appendicitis in the current literature. Regardless of whether post-colonoscopy appendicitis is a true entity, it should be considered as a differential diagnosis in any patient presenting with acute abdomen following colonoscopy.

The purpose of this study is to review the cases of postcolonoscopy appendicitis (PCA) reported in the literature. A comprehensive search using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar identified 57 cases. The median age at presentations of PCA was 55 years. PCAs typically occurred during the first 24 hours after colonoscopy, and the majority developed after diagnostic colonoscopy. Clinical presentations were similar to those with common acute appendicitis, though with a high perforation rate. Most patients were correctly diagnosed using ultrasound or computed tomography scan. Treatment included open appendicectomy, laparoscopic appendicectomy or cecotomy, radiologic drainage of the abscess, nonoperative treatment with antibiotics. In addition to barotrauma, fecalith impaction into the appendiceal lumen, direct trauma to the appendiceal orifice, and underlying ulcerative colitis, a pre-existing subclinical disease of the appendix seems to play an important role in the pathogenesis. For PCA, timely diagnosis and management are crucial to attain a satisfactory outcome.

Physicians who perform colonoscopy should consider appendicitis in the differential diagnosis of post procedure abdominal pain. Diagnostic laparoscopy is a safe adjunct for evaluation in patients with suspected perforation after colonoscopy. It is important that all physicians be aware of this complication to ensure prompt diagnosis and intervention.

Introduction. Intestinal perforation is a known complication after colonoscopy. However, appendiceal involvement with inflammation and perforation is extremely rare and only 37 cases of postcolonoscopy appendicitis have been reported so far. We describe a case of perforated appendicitis 24 hours after colonoscopy that was treated successfully in our Department. Case Report. A 60-year-old female patient underwent a colonoscopy during the investigation of nontypical abdominal pain without pathologic findings. 24 hours after the examination she presented gradually increased right lower quadrant abdominal pain and a CT scan was performed, showing an inflammation of the appendiceal area with free peritoneal air. Through laparotomy, perforated appendicitis was diagnosed and an appendectomy was performed. The patient was discharged on the tenth postoperative day in good health condition. Discussion. The characteristics of all cases reported in the literature are described, including our case. Perforated appendicitis soon after a colonoscopy is a rare, but serious complication; therefore, it is crucial to be included in the differential diagnosis of postcolonoscopy acute abdominal pain.

Colonoscopy is a widely used diagnostic and therapeutic modality with a relatively low morbidity. However, given the large volume of procedures performed, awareness of the infrequent complications is essential. Perforation is an established complication of colonoscopy, and can range from 0.2%-3% depending on the series, population and modality of colonoscopy. Acute appendicitis after colonoscopy is an extremely rare event, and a cause-effect relationship between the colonoscopy and the appendicitis is not well documented. In addition, awareness of this condition can aid in prompt diagnosis. Relatively mild symptoms and exclusion of bowel perforation by contrast studies do not exclude appendicitis from the differential diagnosis for post-colonoscopy pain. In addition to the difficult diagnosis inherent to postcolonoscopy appendicitis, treatment strategies have varied greatly. This paper reviews these approaches. We also expand upon prior articles by giving guidance for the role of nonoperative management in these patients. This case and review of the literature will help to create awareness about this complication, and guide optimal treatment of pericolonoscopy appendicitis.

Flexible endoscopy is a widely used diagnostic and therapeutic procedure. Contaminated endoscopes are the medical devices frequently associated with outbreaks of health care-associated infections. Accurate reprocessing of flexible endoscopes involves cleaning and high-level disinfection followed by rinsing and drying before storage. Most contemporary flexible endoscopes cannot be heat sterilized and are designed with multiple channels, which are difficult to clean and disinfect. The ability of bacteria to form biofilms on the inner channel surfaces can contribute to failure of the decontamination process. Implementation of microbiological surveillance of endoscope reprocessing is appropriate to detect early colonization and biofilm formation in the endoscope and to prevent contamination and infection in patients after endoscopic procedures. This review presents an overview of the infections and cross-contaminations related to flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy and illustrates the impact of biofilm on endoscope reprocessing and postendoscopic infection.

Colonoscopy is a common procedure used for screening, diagnosis, and treatment of gastrointestinal disease. Life-threatening complications are uncommon (28/10 000 procedures) but include perforation, hemorrhage, diverticulitis, and postpolypectomy syndrome. Although previously reported, the association between appendicitis and colonoscopy is not widely known. This case report highlights the underlying pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and diagnosis of postcolonoscopy appendicitis. A 52-year-old man presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain 8 hours after an uncomplicated routine screening colonoscopy. He initially reported mild generalized abdominal discomfort which 3 hours after the procedure intensified and localized to the periumbilical region. Computed tomography of the abdomen with oral and intravenous contrast revealed appendicitis as the cause of his abdominal pain. He underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and recovered uneventfully. Colonoscopy is a common procedure that rarely has life-threatening complications. Although establishing causality is difficult, there is an association between colonoscopy and appendicitis, which may be underreported with literature-based estimates as high as 3.8 appendicitis cases per 10 000 procedures. Timely diagnosis of postcolonoscopy appendicitis may prove challenging given limited knowledge of this association between colonoscopy and appendicitis and similarity of presentation with other more well-known complications. This case report demonstrates that a recent history of colonoscopy should not preclude consideration of a traditionally broad differential diagnosis for abdominal pain, including appendicitis.

A 48-year-old woman who was without any abnormal past medical history underwent colonoscopy as a screening procedure for colorectal disease. The procedure was uneventful and there was no sign of inflammation around the appendicular orifice or the luminal surface of the cecum. The patient did not complain of pain or significant discomfort throughout the procedure. She then developed pain in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen that evening and this persisted for four days. She visited the outpatient department and underwent abdominal ultrasonography, which showed a swollen appendix with a collection of pericecal fluid. Surgical exploration and appendectomy were performed; the final diagnosis was acute suppurative appendicitis. Colonoscopists should be aware of this rare complication and consider it when making the differential diagnosis of post-colonoscopy abdominal pain.

During the period 1979 to 1989, 0.1% of all cases of acute appendicitis at our institution occurred soon after another operative procedure. The interval between primary operation and appendectomy was 5 to 31 days (mean, 14 days). Signs and symptoms did not differ from those of classical acute appendicitis. Duration of symptoms ranged from 12 hours to 8 days (mean, 2.4 days). Perforation was present in 3 patients, suppurative appendicitis in 1 patient, and acute inflammation in 4 patients. Two of the perforations were associated with abscess formation. Morbidity related to the appendiceal condition included hepatic abscesses, septic shock, and prolonged ileus. There was no mortality. Hospitalization ranged from 6 to 80 days (mean, 12.5 days).