Variceal bleeding is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with cirrhosis. While both transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) are utilized for variceal rebleeding prevention, their comparative efficacy and safety remain debated.

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare TIPS with EVL for variceal rebleeding prevention. A comprehensive search of electronic databases on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science identified 16 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Data on outcomes including gastrointestinal bleeding, variceal rebleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, treatment failure, and mortality were extracted and analyzed.

TIPS was associated with significantly lower rates of gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = -0.69, 95% CI [-0.92, -0.47], P < 0.001), variceal rebleeding (RR: -0.99, 95% CI [-1.2, -0.79], P < 0.001), and bleeding from banding ulcers (RR: -1.51, 95% CI [-2.75, -0.27], P = 0.02) compared to EVL. However, TIPS was linked to higher rates of hepatic encephalopathy (RR: 0.44, 95% CI [0.18, 0.71], P < 0.001) and treatment failure (RR: -1.29, 95% CI [-2.01, -0.57], P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in mortality, liver failure, hepatocellular carcinoma, or other clinical outcomes between the two interventions.

TIPS demonstrates superiority over EVL in reducing variceal rebleeding and gastrointestinal bleeding. However, it is associated with higher rates of hepatic encephalopathy and treatment failure. Individualized treatment decisions should consider patient characteristics and treatment goals to optimize outcomes in variceal bleeding management. Further research is warranted to refine treatment strategies and minimize adverse events associated with both interventions.

Esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding is a catastrophic complication of portal hypertension, most commonly caused by cirrhosis of various etiologies. Although a considerable body of research has been conducted in this area, the complexity of the disease and the lack of standardized treatment strategies have led to fragmented findings, insufficient information, and a lack of systematic investigation. Bibliometric analysis can help clarify research trends, identify core topics, and reveal potential future directions. Therefore, this study aims to use bibliometric methods to conduct an in-depth exploration of research progress in this field, with the expectation of providing new insights for both clinical practice and scientific research.

To evaluate research trends and advancements in esophagogastric variceal bleeding (EGVB) over the past twenty years.

Relevant publications on EGVB were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. VOSviewer, Pajek, CiteSpace, and the bibliometrix package were then employed to perform bibliometric visualizations of publication volume, countries, institutions, journals, authors, keywords, and citation counts.

The analysis focused on original research articles and review papers. From 2004 to 2023, a total of 2097 records on EGVB were retrieved. The number of relevant publications has increased significantly over the past two decades, especially in China and the United States. The leading contributors in this field, in terms of countries, institutions, authors, and journals, were China, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bosch Jaime, and World Journal of Gastroenterology, respectively. Core keywords in this field include portal hypertension, management, liver cirrhosis, risk, prevention, and diagnosis. Future research directions may focus on optimizing diagnostic methods, personalized treatment, and multidisciplinary collaboration.

Using bibliometric methods, this study reveals the developmental trajectory and trends in research on EGVB, underscoring risk assessment and diagnostic optimization as the core areas of current focus. The study provides an innovative and systematic perspective for this field, indicating that future research could center on multidisciplinary collaboration, personalized treatment approaches, and the development of new diagnostic tools. Moreover, this work offers practical research directions for both the academic community and clinical practice, driving continued advancement in this domain.

A consensus has not yet been reached regarding the optimal timing for the combination of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and partial splenic embolization (PSE) in patients with cirrhosis-related variceal bleeding and hypersplenism. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent either an early or late combination of TIPS and PSE.

A total of 84 consecutive patients with cirrhosis-related variceal bleeding and hypersplenism who underwent TIPS and PSE between September 2016 and April 2023 were included in this retrospective multicenter study. These patients were subsequently divided into early combination (n = 36) and late combination (n = 48) groups based on the timing of the combination therapy.

Kaplan-Meier curves revealed a significant increase in cumulative survival in the late combination group, compared with that in the early combination group (log-rank P = 0.018). Additionally, the late combination group exhibited a lower cumulative incidence of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE), compared with the early combination group (log-rank P = 0.002). In Cox regression models, noninfarcted splenic volume (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.995, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.991-0.999, P = 0.044) and grouping (HR = 0.101, 95% CI = 0.011-0.921, P = 0.034) were identified as independent risk factors for mortality. Furthermore, the independent risk factors for OHE were serum albumin (ALB) level (P = 0.032) and grouping (P = 0.028).

The early combination of TIPS and PSE was associated with higher risks of death and OHE than the late combination.

Systematic strategies for preventing and treating esophagogastric variceal rebleeding (EVRB) are currently inadequate. This systematic review aimed to update this critical gap by searching contemporary studies from major guideline websites, databases, and professional associations focused on EVRB prevention in cirrhosis patients. Key findings highlight evaluation methods, risk management, preventive measures, health education, and follow-up strategies. Notably, a hepatic venous pressure gradient exceeding 18 mmHg is identified as a reliable predictor of gastroesophageal varices (GOV) rebleeding. Effective management of primary diseases is crucial, with methods including antiviral and anti-fibrotic therapies, alcohol avoidance, vaccination, and careful medication management. The combination of nonselective β-blockers (NSBBs) and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is established as the gold standard for secondary EVRB prevention. For patients experiencing recurrent bleeding despite NSBBs and EVL, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) therapy is recommended. Surgical options, such as surgical shunt and devascularization, are advised for those unsuitable for endoscopic therapy or TIPS, particularly in Child-Pugh A and B patients unresponsive to treatment. Additionally, traditional Chinese medicine options, such as Fufang Biejia Ruangan Tablets, Fuzheng Huayu Capsules, and Anluo Huaxian Pills, have shown promise in improving hepatic fibrosis and GOV in cirrhotic patients. This review offers a comprehensive overview of current prevention and treatment strategies for EVRB, providing valuable insights for clinicians and healthcare professionals.

The treatment outcomes and risk factors for the prognosis of acute variceal bleeding (AVB) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients remain unclear. Hence, we assessed the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of these patients.

This study retrospectively enrolled 1532 AVB patients with cirrhosis from January 2016 to December 2022. Of these patients, 310 had HCC, and after 1:1 individual matching, 306 of them were matched with 306 patients without HCC. Six-week mortality, one-year mortality, and five-day treatment failure were recorded.

In the matched-pair analysis, patients with HCC had a higher rate of 6-week and 1-year mortality than those without HCC (6-week: 24.5% vs 7.8%, P < 0.001; 1-year: 45.9% vs 16.2%, P < 0.001). The rate of 5-day treatment failure was similar between the two groups (21.1% vs 16.7%, P = 0.213). Among AVB patients with HCC, the multivariate analysis revealed that the Child-Pugh score (HR, 1.239, 95% CI, 1.121-1.370; P < 0.001) and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage (C-D vs 0-B) (HR, 14.409; 95% CI, 5.758-36.055; P < 0.001) were independently associated with 6-week mortality. Moreover, the rate of 6-week mortality was 60.2% in patients who had a high Child-Pugh score (≥9) and advanced BCLC stage (C-D), much higher than in those with low Child-Pugh score (<9) and earlier BCLC stage (0-B) (P < 0.001).

Among patients with cirrhosis and AVB, patients with HCC had significantly worse outcomes than those without. The severity of liver disease and the stage of HCC are the main determinants of mortality in HCC patients.

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis can present with features of severe portal hypertension, which can be worsened further by portal vein tumoral thrombosis (PVTT). Due to the technical difficulties and short survival of these patients, HCC was traditionally considered a relative contra-indication for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). However, there is an increasing body of evidence, mainly from China, supporting the use of TIPS in HCC. The present study aimed at analyzing the efficacy and safety of TIPS in patients with HCC.

From 2000 through May 2023, MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus were searched for studies analyzing the outcome of TIPS in HCC. Technical and clinical success, adverse events (AE) and mortality were the main outcomes assessed. With the use of a random effects model, the event rates were combined.

Total 19 studies with 1498 patients were included in the final analysis. The pooled technical and clinical success rates with TIPS in HCC were 98.8% (98.0-99.7) and 94.1% (91.2-97.0), respectively. After TIPS, ascites was controlled in 89.2% (85.1-93.3) of the cases, while rebleeding was observed in 17.2% (9.4-25.0) of cases on follow-up. The pooled incidence of overall AE, serious AE and post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy (HE) was 5.2% (2.5-7.9), 0.1% (0.0-0.4) and 25.1% (18.7-31.5), respectively. On follow-up, 11.9% (7.8-15.9) of the patients developed shunt dysfunction requiring re-intervention.

The present analysis supports the feasibility, safety and efficacy of TIPS in the management of portal hypertension in patients with HCC.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) reduces portal hypertension complications. Its impact on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. We evaluated 42,843 liver transplant candidates with HCC from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (2002-2022). 4,484 patients with and without TIPS were propensity score-matched 1:3. Analysing wait-list changes in total tumor volume, HCC count, and alpha-fetoprotein levels, and assessing survival from listing and transplantation; TIPS correlated with a decreased nodule count (-0.24 vs. 0.04, p = 0.028) over a median wait period of 284 days (IQR 195-493) and better overall survival from listing (95.6% vs. 91.5% at 1 year, p < 0.0001). It was not associated with changes in tumor volume (0.28 vs. 0.11 cm³/month, p = 0.58) and AFP (14.37 vs. 20.67 ng/mL, p = 0.42). Post-transplant survival rates (91.8% vs. 91.7% at 1 year, p = 0.25) and HCC recurrence (5.1% vs. 5.9% at 5 years, p = 0.14) were similar, with a median follow-up of 4.98 years (IQR 2.5-8.08). While TIPS was associated with a reduced nodule count and improved waitlist survival, it did not significantly impact HCC growth or aggressiveness. These findings suggest potential benefits of TIPS in HCC management, but further studies need to confirm TIPS safety.

Cirrhosis is a chronic disease characterized by chronic liver inflammation and diffuse fibrosis. A combination of vasoactive drugs, preventive antibiotics, and endoscopy is the recommended standard treatment for patients with acute variceal bleeding; however, this has been challenged. We compared the effects of early transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), non-early TIPS, and standard treatment in patients with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding.

The present network meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the criteria outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews guidelines. The review has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization-approved trial registry databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating early TIPS, non-early TIPS, and standard treatment in patients with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding.

Twenty-four RCTs (1894 patients) were included in the review. Compared with standard treatment, early TIPS [odds ratio (OR), 0.53; 95% credible interval (Cr), 0.30-0.94; surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), 98.3] had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (moderate-to-high-quality evidence), and early TIPS (OR, 0.19; 95% CrI, 0.11-0.28; SUCRA, 98.2) and non-early TIPS (OR, 0.30; 95% CrI, 0.23-0.42; SUCRA, 1.8) were associated with a lower risk of rebleeding (moderate-to-high-quality evidence). Early TIPS was not associated with a reduced risk of hepatic encephalopathy, and non-early TIPS (OR, 2.78; 95% CrI, 1.89-4.23, SUCRA, 0) was associated with an increased incidence of hepatic encephalopathy (moderate-to-high-quality evidence). There was no difference in the incidence of new or worsening ascites (moderate-to-high-quality evidence) among the three interventions.

Based on the moderate-to-high quality evidence presented in this study, early TIPS placement was associated with reduced all-cause mortality [with a median follow-up of 1.9 years (25th-75th percentile range 1.9-2.3 years)] and rebleeding compared to standard treatment and non-early TIPS. Although early TIPS and standard treatment had a comparable incidence of hepatic encephalopathy, early TIPS showed superiority over non-early TIPS in this aspect. Recent studies have also shown promising results in controlling TIPS-related hepatic encephalopathy. However, it is important to consider individual patient characteristics and weigh the potential benefits against the risks associated with early TIPS. Therefore, we recommend that clinicians carefully evaluate the patient's condition, considering factors such as severity of variceal bleeding, underlying liver disease, and overall clinical status, before making a treatment decision. Further well-designed RCTs comparing early TIPS with non-early TIPS are needed to validate these findings and provide more definitive guidance.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a well-validated treatment option for clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in the context of liver cirrhosis. Its high efficacy and safety in the management of treatment-refractory ascites and variceal bleeding have been extensively proven. Contraindications for TIPS include severe right heart failure, hepatic encephalopathy, and sepsis. However, the role of liver malignancy in TIPS is debatable. Mostly, primary liver malignancies such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) emerge from advanced liver diseases. Coexisting portal hypertension in HCC often results in limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. Previous studies have shown that TIPS implantation in patients with HCC is technically feasible and is usually not associated with major adverse events. Furthermore, TIPS may help in bridging the time to liver transplantation in early HCC and allow for locoregional treatment in advanced HCC. However, several studies suggest that seeding tumour cells to the lungs by TIPS placement might worsen the prognosis.

TIPS placement in patients with coexisting liver malignancy remains a case-by-case decision, and there is no profound evidence allowing general recommendations. This review aims to provide a state-of-the-art overview of the potential risks and benefits of TIPS placement in patients with liver malignancies.