Gallbladder and biliary diseases remain a major contributor to the causes of global disease burden. The study aims to provide updated estimates and projections of the global burden of gallbladder and biliary diseases from 1990 to 2021.

We extracted age-standardised prevalence rate (ASPR), incidence rate (ASIR) and disability-adjusted life years rate (ASDR) from the 2021 Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD). We analysed the data by calculating the annual percentage change (EAPC) and stratified the data by sex, across 20 age groups, 21 GBD regions, 204 countries and territories, and five Socio-demographic Index (SDI) quintiles.

The global burden remained grim, with a total number of 251 574 857 cases [95% uncertainty interval (UI): 215272108-293 541 994] and an ASPR of 2966.7 per 100 000 persons (95% UI: 2551.7-3447.6) in 2021. The ASIR was 865.4 per 100 000 persons (95% UI: 747.6-1000.8), with the ASDR of 91.7 per 100 000 persons (95% UI: 69.6-122.1). Regionally, Central Europe had both the highest ASPR and ASIR, while Central Latin America showed the highest ASDR. Globally, 35.9% of gallbladder and biliary diseases burden is attributed to high Body mass index (BMI) and 4.8% to smoking. It is projected that by 2040, the global burden of gallbladder and biliary diseases will rise slightly across these main indicators.

Although the global prevalence of gallbladder and biliary diseases has been declining over the past 32 years, the severe economic burden caused by it still exists, and there are huge differences between the levels of development of different regions and countries.

Laparoscopic surgeries (LSs) are underperformed in low-income countries with inadequate health infrastructure due to many restrictive factors. In this study, we aimed to present the process and results of the first bilateral collaboration protocol (BCP) for LS in an African university hospital where laparoscopic surgery had not been performed before.

A 3-stage BCP was implemented between the University of Health Sciences (Turkey) and Jigjiga University Hospital (Somali State, Ethiopia) between January and June 2024. In the first stage, training was received in Turkey for 3-6 months. In the second stage, 2 general surgery, 2 gynecology and obstetrics, and one ear-nose-throat (ENT) clinic training officers from the University of Health Sciences went to Jigjiga University Hospital and provided the installation of laparoscopic devices, on-site training of surgeons and other operating room personnel, and the initiation of the first laparoscopic and minimally invasive surgeries for a week. In the third stage, LS performed in the first 30 days after the end of the program were connected via video call.

This training was held at Jigjiga University Hospital, the only university hospital in the Somali state of Ethiopia.

The first stage of this training was attended by the teaching staff of the surgical clinics at Jigjiga University Hospital. The second stage of the program was attended by all surgeons, clinical assistants, operating room nurses and staff at Jigjiga University Hospital.

In the second stage of the program, a total of 25 patients underwent the first laparoscopic and minimally invasive surgeries in the state in 1 week. 13 (52%) were performed by general surgery, 7 (28%) by gynecology and 5 (20%) by ENT. In the third stage, 24 laparoscopic procedures were performed in the first 30 days.

In low-income countries with limited resources, laparoscopic surgeries can be introduced with the right training programs and appropriate bilateral collaboration programs.

Acute appendicitis is a common emergency in rural Kenya. While open appendectomy is widely used, minimally invasive approaches may improve postoperative recovery and superficial surgical site infection rates. However, adoption in resource-limited settings is hindered by cost and availability, with fewer than 1% of operations involving laparoscopy. This study evaluates the effectiveness and costs of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy to inform practices in similar settings.

A retrospective study at Tenwek Hospital, Kenya (2015-2019), compared laparoscopic and open appendectomy using a bottom-up micro-costing method for true healthcare costs, adjusted for inflation and expressed in international dollars using purchasing power parity (I$PPP). Outcomes, including operating room turnaround time, hospital length of stay, superficial surgical site infections, and financial impact, were analyzed with Pearson's chi-squared, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and a multilevel generalized linear model to adjust for patient comorbidities and severity.

Among 168 patients, median age was 34 years (IQR: 26-44), with 71% men, and perforation in 45%. Laparoscopic surgery was performed on 31 patients, with one conversion, versus open surgery in 137. The laparoscopic group had longer operating room turnaround times (115 vs. 75 min, p < 0.001) but shorter hospital stays (2 vs. 4 days, p = 0.002). Total costs were lower for laparoscopy cases (1527 vs. 1816 I$PPP, p = 0.049), with surgical site infections (3.2% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.026).

Despite longer surgery times, laparoscopic appendectomy significantly reduces hospital stays, total costs, and surgical site infections compared to open surgery in rural Kenya.

In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), laparoscopic surgery is challenging to implement due to limited resources and lack of expert surgeons as teachers. The Global Laparoscopic Advancement Program (GLAP) was developed by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) to deliver sustainable and effective methods for teaching safe laparoscopic surgery. GLAP aims to train surgical leaders and trainees with the goal of eventual in-country replication of GLAP programming. After successful implementation in Mexico and Costa Rica, this study evaluates the feasibility of a pilot training course in Namibia, Southern Africa.

In December 2022 and September 2023, GLAP partnered with the Namibian Surgical Society and the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) to administer 2 GLAP courses, with hands-on simulation practice and lectures on surgical education, training, and curriculum development. Participants completed surveys assessing their surgical background and experiences, their experience with simulation, and interest in curriculum development at their home institutions. Participants were also evaluated on their time to completion for the five FLS tasks during the initial and final days of the program.

Over two GLAP courses, there were a total of 31 practicing general, gynecologic, and urologic surgeons from Namibia, Ethiopia, Malawi, Somali, and Zambia, taught by 5-7 GLAP faculty members. Overall, 35.5% had formal laparoscopic training during residency or fellowship, 16.13% had no experience with laparoscopy, and 77.42% learned laparoscopy through observation. Fifty-three percent of respondents had never practiced laparoscopy on a simulator before and 45% of respondents noted they did not have mentors to help them learn laparoscopic skills. Eighty percent of participants noted lack of equipment as the most important factor limiting the use of laparoscopy, followed by 76% noting lack of trained surgeons and 73% noting lack of formal training. The majority of respondents noted a very strong desire for formal training (61%), including additional short-term courses in laparoscopy (58%) and FLS skills testing opportunities (63%) in the future. For skills acquisition, there was a statistically significant reduction in the time to complete the circle cut task at the end of the course (359.2 s vs 206 s, p-value 0.016) across both years.

There is limited adoption of laparoscopy in Namibia, hindered by lack of training, expert trainers, and equipment. Implementation of GLAP is feasible and offers an additional training opportunity to the region.

Laparoscopic surgery (LS) has been a promising development in surgical practice globally ever since its introduction. LS has exhibited many an advantage, including bettering patient outcomes, lowering the risk of postoperative infection, and displaying economical affluence. However, its implementation in the African continent still faces various challenges. In this review, we investigated the status of laparoscopic surgery integration in Africa.

In this review, we aimed to investigate the challenges posed by the implementation of LS in low resource countries as well as critically evaluating initiatives and their impact within said domiciles. We also provide recommendations that may assist in LS prosperity in these settings by focusing efforts on improving training and financial incentives.

A comprehensive literature review was conducted to garner up-to-date evidence concerning the fate of LS adoption in low- to middle-income countries. This comprised the analysis of different case studies from countries including Nigeria and Botswana, and investigated relevant recommendations and policies provided by other African countries.

Various challenges face the implementation of LS in countries with low resources comprising poor infrastructure, scarce training programs, and expert training personnel alongside financial boundaries. The adoption of LS in Africa has proved its benefits in improving patient outcomes and reducing hospital admissions. From a perspective of policy, it is crucial to sustain strong ties amongst institutions, stressing the importance of dynamic collaboration and locally tailored policies.

It has been demonstrated that LS implementations in African nations lower infection rates and expedite recovery. A strong collaboration between governments, stakeholders, and healthcare providers is fundamental for successful integration of LS. Such extension in low-resource environments may be achieved by providing proper training programs, funding infrastructure and equipment, and fostering effective financial initiatives.

With the primary objective of addressing the disparity in global surgical care access, the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) trains surgeons. While sufficient operative experience is crucial for surgical training, the extent of utilization of minimally invasive techniques during COSECSA training remains understudied.

We conducted an extensive review of COSECSA general surgery trainees' operative case logs from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020, focusing on the utilization of minimally invasive surgical procedures. Our primary objective was to determine the prevalence of laparoscopic procedures and compare this to open procedures. We analyzed the distribution of laparoscopic cases across common indications such as cholecystectomy, appendicitis, and hernia operations. Additionally, we examined the impact of trainee autonomy, country development index, and hospital type on laparoscopy utilization.

Among 68,659 total cases, only 616 (0.9%) were laparoscopic procedures. Notably, 34 cases were conducted during trainee external rotations in countries like the United Kingdom, Germany, and India. Gallbladder and appendix pathologies were most frequent among the 582 recorded laparoscopic cases performed in Africa. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy accounted for 29% (276 of 975 cases), laparoscopic appendectomy for 3% (76 of 2548 cases), and laparoscopic hernia repairs for 0.5% (26 of 5620 cases). Trainees self-reported lower autonomy for laparoscopic (22.5%) than open cases (61.5%). Laparoscopy usage was more prevalent in upper-middle-income (2.7%) and lower-middle-income countries (0.8%) compared with lower-income countries (0.5%) (p < 0.001). Private (1.6%) and faith-based hospitals (1.5%) showed greater laparoscopy utilization than public hospitals (0.5%) (p < 0.001).

The study highlights the relatively low utilization of minimally invasive techniques in surgical training within the ECSA region. Laparoscopic cases remain a minority, with variations observed based on specific diagnoses. The findings suggest a need to enhance exposure to minimally invasive procedures to ensure well-rounded training and proficiency in these techniques.

The clinical benefits of laparoscopic appendicectomy are well recognized over open appendicectomy. However, laparoscopic procedures are not frequently conducted in many low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) for several reasons, including perceived higher costs. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and cost of laparoscopic appendicectomy compared to open appendicectomy in Nigeria.

A multicenter, prospective, cohort study among patients undergoing appendicectomy was conducted at three tertiary hospitals in Nigeria. Data were collected from October 2020 to February 2022 and analyses compared the average healthcare costs at 30 days after surgery. Quantile regression was conducted to identify variables that had an impact on the costs, reported in Nigerian Naira (Naira) and US dollars ($), with standard deviations (SD).

This study included 105 patients, of which 39 had laparoscopic appendicectomy and 66 had open appendicectomy. The average healthcare cost of laparoscopic appendicectomy (147,562 Naira (SD: 97,130) or $355 (SD: 234)) was higher than open appendicectomy (113,556 Naira (SD: 88,559) or $273 (SD: 213)). The average time for return to work was shorter with laparoscopic than open appendicectomy (mean: 8 days vs. 14 days). At the average daily income of $5.06, laparoscopic appendicectomy was associated with 9778 Naira or $24 cost savings in return to work. Further, 5.1% of laparoscopic appendicectomy patients had surgical site infections compared to 22.7% for open appendicectomy. Regression analysis results showed that laparoscopic appendicectomy was associated with $14 higher costs than open appendicectomy, albeit non-significant (p = 0.53).

Despite selection bias in this real-world study, laparoscopic appendicectomy was associated with a slightly higher overall cost, a lower societal cost, a lower infection rate, and a faster return to work, compared to open appendicectomy. It is technically and financially feasible, and its provision in Nigeria should be expanded.

Gallbladder and biliary diseases (GABDs) are a major public health issue.

To analysis the cause-specific incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability (YLDs) and its temporal trends of GABDs at the global, regional, and national level. Data on GABD were available from the Global Burden of Disease study 2019.

The estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) was used to quantify temporal trend in GABD age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs), age-standardized prevalence rate (ASPR), and age-standardized YLD rate (ASYR) by region, sex. We analyzed the relationship between the GABD burden and country development level using the human development index (HDI).

In 2019, the incident cases of GABD were 52003772, with an ASIR of 63432/100000 population. Globally, the number of incident cases and ASIR of GABD increased 97% and 58.9% between 1990 and 2019. Although, the ASPR and ASYR decreased from 1990 to 2019, the number of prevalent and YLDs cases increased. The highest ASIR was observed in Italy, and the highest ASPR and ASYR was observed in United Kingdom. The highest burden of GABD was found in low-SDI region, and the burden in female was significantly higher than males. A generally negative correlation (ρ = -0.24, P < 0.05) of GABD with the EAPC and human development index (HDI) (in 2021) were observed for ASIR. What's more, no correlation in ASPR (ρ = -0.06, P = 0.39) and ASYR (ρ = -0.07, P = 0.36) of GABD with the EAPC and HDI (in 2021) were observed, respectively.

GABD remain a major global public health challenge; however, the burden of GABD varies geographically. Globally, the number of incident cases and ASIR of GABD increased between 1990 and 2019. The results of our study provide insight into the global disease burden of GABD and may assist policymakers in formulating effective policies to mitigate modifiable risk factors.

A program of gasless laparoscopy (GL) has been implemented in rural North-East India. To facilitate safe adoption, participating rural surgeons underwent rigorous training prior to independent clinical practice. An online registry was established to capture clinical data on safety and efficacy and to evaluate initial learning curves for gasless laparoscopy.

Surgeons who had completed the GL training program participated in the online RedCap Registry. Patients included in the registry provided informed consent for the use of their data. Data on operative times, conversion rates, perioperative complications, length of stay, and hospital costs were collected. Fixed reference cumulative sum (CUSUM) model was used to evaluate the learning curve based on operative times and conversion rates published in the literature.

Four surgeons from three rural hospitals in North-East India participated in the registry. The data were collected over 12 months, from September 2019 to August 2020. One hundred and twenty-three participants underwent GL procedures, including 109 females (88.6%) and 14 males. GL procedures included cholecystectomy, appendicectomy, tubal ligation, ovarian cystectomy, diagnostic laparoscopy, and adhesiolysis. The mean operative time was 75.3 (42.05) minutes for all the surgeries. Conversion from GL to open surgery occurred in 11.4% of participants, with 8.9% converted to conventional laparoscopy. The main reasons for conversion were the inability to secure an operative view, lack of operating space, and adhesions. The mean length of stay was 3 (2.1) days. The complication rate was 5.7%, with one postoperative death. The CUSUM analysis for GL cholecystectomy showed a longer learning curve for operative time and few conversions. The learning curve for GL tubal ligation was relatively shorter.

Gasless laparoscopy can be safely implemented in the rural settings of Northeast India with appropriate training programs. Careful case selection is essential during the early stages of the surgical learning curve.

The resource-limited environment in Sub-Saharan countries, with a lack of expert trainers, impedes the progress of laparoscopic training. This study aimed to identify the opportunities and limitations of laparoscopic surgery training in the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) countries.

A multicountry online survey was conducted from January 2021 to October 2021 in COSECSA-accredited training hospitals within 16 countries. Available resources and challenges faced in order to set up well-structured laparoscopic training programs were explored.

Ninety-four surgeons answered the questionnaire. The average resources reported per hospital were 3 trained laparoscopic surgeons, 2 laparoscopic towers, and 2 sets of laparoscopic instruments. The training of the majority of these surgeons has been in local institutions (53%), a further 37% within African countries and only 10% outside Africa. Approximately 45% of them declared that laparoscopic modules were planned within the University Curricula, while only 18% of surgeons recognized that laparoscopic modules are only planned within the COSECSA program. About 57% of participants reported that at the end of residency training, graduating surgeons were not able to perform basic laparoscopic procedures. The quoted barriers included: limited laparoscopic equipment, absence of simulation lab, lack of qualified trainers, lack of training programs and time for teaching by skilled doctors, and lack of institutional support.

The well-structured set up of laparoscopic training programs in the COSECSA region is hindered due to the lack of qualified personnel and insufficient resources for the acquisition of equipment and simulation laboratories. Ongoing efforts to set up laparoscopic programs through the development of adaptive curricula, innovative strategies for reduction of equipment cost and adequate training of surgeons are crucial for patient safety and the development of laparoscopy.

Laparoscopic training remains inaccessible for surgeons in low- and middle-income countries, limiting its widespread adoption. We developed a novel tool for assessment of laparoscopic appendectomy skills through ALL-SAFE, a low-cost laparoscopy training system.

This pilot study in Ethiopia, Cameroon, and the USA assessed appendectomy skills using the ALL-SAFE training system. Performance measures were captured using the ALL-SAFE verification of proficiency tool (APPY-VOP), consisting of a checklist, modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (m-OSATS), and final rating. Twenty participants, including novice (n = 11), intermediate (n = 8), and expert (n = 1), completed an online module covering appendicitis management and psychomotor skills in laparoscopic appendectomy. After viewing an expert skills demonstration video, participants recorded their performance within ALL-SAFE. Using the APPY-VOP, participants rated their own and three peer videos. We used the Kruskal-Wallis test and a Many-Facet Rasch Model to evaluate (i) capacity of APPY-VOP to differentiate performance levels, (ii) correlation among three APPY-VOP components, and (iii) rating differences across groups.

Checklist scores increased from novice (M = 21.02) to intermediate (M = 23.64) and expert (M = 28.25), with differentiation between experts and novices, P = 0.005. All five m-OSATS domains and global summed, total summed, and final rating discriminated across all performance levels (P < 0.001). APPY-VOP final ratings adequately discriminated Competent (M = 2.0), Borderline (N = 1.8), and Not Competent (M = 1.4) performances, Χ2 (2,85) = 32.3, P = 0.001. There was a positive correlation between ALL-SAFE checklist and m-OSATS summed scores, r(83) = 0.63, P < 0.001. Comparison of ratings suggested no differences across expertise levels (P = 0.69) or location (P = 0.66).

APPY-VOP effectively discriminated between novice and expert performance in laparoscopic appendectomy skills in a simulated setting. Scoring alignment across raters suggests consistent evaluation, independent of expertise. These results support the use of APPY-VOP among all skill levels inside a peer rating system. Future studies will focus on correlating proficiency to clinical practice and scaling ALL-SAFE to other settings.

Case-based learning (CBL) utilizes authentic clinical cases that connect theory to practice. CBL has been shown to result in deeper learning and high engagement of adult learners. An open-source, web-based CBL module was created to help learners develop the cognitive foundation of ectopic pregnancy management in the low-resource setting. We present psychometric evidence that supports the use of this web-based CBL in the low-resource setting.

The case scenario comprising 20 topics in ectopic pregnancy management was created by an Ethiopian team member and hosted on an interactive web-based platform. The module was reviewed by Ethiopian, Cameroonian, and US surgeons and OB/GYN team members for content, relevance, and clarity, followed by a psychometrician for clarity, bias, relevance, and alignment. Twenty participants (3-Mbingo Baptist Hospital-Cameroon, 6-Soddo Christian Hospital-Ethiopia, 3-Southern Illinois University (SIU), and 8-University of Michigan (UM)) then completed the module. Four attending surgeons (2 OB/GYN, 2 general surgery) were designated experts while 10 medical students and 6 residents were designated novices. The module included a 10-item dichotomously scored pre-test, the CBL content, and the same, but shuffled, post-test. Pre- and post-test summed scores were compared using paired Student's t-tests, while differences in scores across participants' experience levels and sites were analyzed using a many-facet Rasch model.

Findings indicated a statistically significant improvement in participants' mean summed scores from pre-test (M = 6.7, SD = 2.2) to post-test (M = 9.0, SD = 1.5), t(20) = - 4.76, P < 0.0001 and confirmed by Rasch analysis, P < 0.001. An adequate distribution of difficulty was demonstrated and 80% of questions had high discrimination value between experts and novices, d = | 0.87, 1.40 |. There was no difference in scores across specialties. Following the module, expert scores (M = 9.7) were higher than novice scores (M = 9.0), but the difference was not statistically significant.

Our findings suggest that using a web-based CBL module could be used to effectively improve understanding of the management of ectopic pregnancy in the low-resource setting, especially for nascent surgeons. The concept of a web-based CBL module has special attraction in the low-resource setting as it may target the adult surgical learner in remote regions where established technologies and existing experts are unavailable.

Many surgeons in low- and middle-income countries have described performing surgery using gasless (lift) laparoscopy due to inaccessibility of carbon dioxide and reliable electricity, but the safety and feasibility of the technique has not been well documented. We describe preclinical testing of the in vivo safety and utility of KeyLoop, a laparoscopic retractor system to enable gasless laparoscopy.

Experienced laparoscopic surgeons completed a series of four laparoscopic tasks in a porcine model: laparoscopic exposure, small bowel resection, intracorporeal suturing with knot tying, and cholecystectomy. For each participating surgeon, the four tasks were completed in a practice animal using KeyLoop. Surgeons then completed these tasks using standard-of-care (SOC) gas laparoscopy and KeyLoop in block randomized order to minimize learning curve effect. Vital signs, task completion time, blood loss and surgical complications were compared between SOC and KeyLoop using paired nonparametric tests. Surgeons completed a survey on use of KeyLoop compared to gas laparoscopy. Abdominal wall tissue was evaluated for injury by a blinded pathologist.

Five surgeons performed 60 tasks in 15 pigs. There were no significant differences in times to complete the tasks between KeyLoop and SOC. For all tasks, there was a learning curve with task completion times related to learning the porcine model. There were no significant differences in blood loss, vital signs or surgical complications between KeyLoop and SOC. Eleven surgeons from the United States and Singapore felt that KeyLoop could be used to safely perform several common surgical procedures. No abdominal wall tissue injury was observed for either KeyLoop or SOC.

Procedure times, blood loss, abdominal wall tissue injury and surgical complications were similar between KeyLoop and SOC gas laparoscopy for basic surgical procedures. This data supports KeyLoop as a useful tool to increase access to laparoscopy in low- and middle-income countries.

The advent of laparoscopy has significantly reduced the morbidity associated with the majority of abdominal surgeries. In Senegal, the first studies evaluating this technique were published in the 1980s. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the evolution of laparoscopy research in Senegal.

A search of PubMed and Google Scholar was carried out without limit of publication date. The keywords used were "senegal" AND "laparoscop*". Duplicates were removed, and remaining articles were assessed for selection criteria. We included all articles about laparoscopy published in Senegal. The parameters studied in each included article were the place and year of study, average age, sex ratio, assessed indications and results.

41 Studies published between 1984 and 2021 met selection criteria. The average age of patients was 33 years (range 4.7-63). The sex ratio was 0.33. The main indications for laparoscopy according to the studies were: benign gastrointestinal disorders in 11 studies (26.8%), abdominal emergencies in 9 studies (22%), gallbladder surgery in 5 studies (12.2%), benign gynecological pathology in 6 studies (14.6%), malignant gynecological pathology in 2 studies (4.9%), diagnostic laparoscopy in 2 studies (4.9%), groin hernia repair in 2 studies (4.9%) and testicular pathology in 1 study (2.4%). Overall mortality was estimated at 0.9% (95% CI 0.6-1.3) and overall morbidity for all complications was estimated at 5% (95% CI 3.4-6.9).

This systematic review showed a predominance of the laparoscopy publications from the capital in Dakar with favorable outcomes. This technique should be popularized in the different regions of the country and its indications expanded.

An increasing shift towards non-communicable diseases and an existing high surgical burden of disease in low-middle-income countries (LMICs) has impelled the need for implementing laparoscopic surgery, a safe and cost-effective surgical service. However, despite countless benefits, laparoscopic surgery programs remain limited throughout LMICs, and limited understanding is known of healthcare professionals' views regarding the implementation of laparoscopic surgery in their local healthcare environments. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to better understand the perceived challenges and barriers to implementing long-term laparoscopic surgery programs from the perspective of healthcare professionals.

Upon receiving ethical approval from the McGill University Health Center (MUHC), a nine-question survey (concerning attributes required to establish a successful laparoscopic program in LMICs and to gain insight into what surgeons from LMICs believed were the necessary next steps) was pilot tested amongst faculty members, and subsequently disseminated to healthcare professionals practicing in LMICs. Explicit consent was obtained from the participants before answering the survey.  Results: Thirty-four participants representing a total of 35 countries participated in the survey with the majority having received laparoscopic surgery training. Overall, participant responses were characterized by two major themes. Highlighted in the first theme, Laparoscopic Experience and Training Curriculum, were responses concerning current laparoscopic training and education, improved career opportunities provided by laparoscopic training, and a particular existing potential to incorporate laparoscopic surgery into the current surgical curriculum at various levels of training. Emphasized in the second theme, Challenges and Next Steps, were responses concerning barriers to the implementation of laparoscopic surgery, current institutional capabilities, and the need for improving mentorship through existing surgical societies such as the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA), West African College of Surgeons (WACS), and The Pan-African Academy of Christian Surgeons (PAACS).

A buy-in from the government, hospitals, staff, and industry is crucial for the long-term implementation of laparoscopic surgery in LMICs, which can only be accomplished through increased advocacy and the dissemination of the benefits of minimally invasive surgery both economically and socially.

The adoption and accessibility of laparoscopy have been serious issues in countries with limited resources, and for varied reasons. This study assessed resource capacity and barriers to the effective practice of laparoscopic surgery in training hospitals affiliated with the College of Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA).

A multi-country survey was conducted from January 2021 to October 2021 using a questionnaire distributed to surgeons in COSECSA hospitals located in 16 different countries. Available resources and surgical volume were assessed, and the barriers to routinely performing laparoscopy were determined.

Ninety-four surgeons working in 44 different hospitals from 16 countries participated in the survey. The majority of respondents were general surgeons (n = 75, 79.7%). Other specialties included urology (n = 12, 12.8%) and pediatric surgery (n = 7, 7.4%). Senior surgeons accounted for 60.6% of participants, more than 40% had a managerial position and approximately 20% were surgical trainees. Most respondents practiced in public hospitals (n = 66, 70.2%). A median of three surgeons per hospital performed laparoscopic surgery with, on average, two laparoscopic towers and two sets of laparoscopic instruments available. A median of 10 procedures was carried out per month. The cost of laparoscopic procedures and laparoscopic consumables were reported as being covered by some health insurance payments in 76.9% and 48.4% of cases, respectively. Cholecystectomy was the most commonly reported laparoscopic procedure performed. The five top barriers to performing laparoscopic surgery were: a lack of consumables, a limited quantity of equipment, a lack of skilled surgeons, the high cost of laparoscopic procedures and complicated cases. In addition, having access to skilled anesthesiologists and anesthesia equipment, carbon dioxide, a consistent electric power supply and equipment maintenance were cited as significant challenges.

The practice of laparoscopy is currently limited in COSECSA countries due to a scarcity of skilled staff and the lack of a funding plan to make laparoscopic services accessible. Therefore, policymakers and stakeholders should take strategic measures to respond to this need.

Mullerian anomalies affect 7% of reproductive age women. It is important to have a basic understanding of these conditions, given they can affect women at any stage of life and have potential impacts on fertility and pregnancy. This article seeks to review these anomalies as well as specific diagnostic pitfalls and strategies to approach these conditions in both high- and low-resource environments.

This review was undertaken with a PubMed focused search, using terms related to the diagnosis and management of Mullerian anomalies in many worldwide settings. Consideration was made to assess the medical resources available in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), which could impact diagnostic and management decisions, compared with high-income countries (HICs). Concurrent medical conditions and both gynecologic and obstetric outcomes were also searched. Practice recommendations from international societies were also reviewed and compared. Finally, 4 conditions were evaluated more closely to assess management differences based on geographic locations and whether the countries were LMICs or HICs; specifically, those evaluated were lower vaginal atresia, uterovaginal agenesis, bicornuate uterus, and septate uterus.

Mullerian anomalies encompass a wide variety of conditions, ranging from subtle anatomic changes without concurrent anomalies to complex conditions, associated with anomalies of the kidney or spine, which could impact the ability to manage certain conditions based on medical resources available geographically. A systematic approach and provider expertise is important for appropriate diagnosis and management, independent of geographic location. Counseling is critical for medical and surgical decision-making and might be limited or guided by the resources available in certain settings or even by existing laws.

Limited outcomes are available among patients with Mullerian anomalies in LMICs; however, the management varies based on the basic tools available to address acute needs, as well as long-term fertility and obstetric concerns. More research is needed in this population, which could help drive the importance of early diagnosis and management not only in HICs but also in LMICs, where individualization strategies are key.

In high-income countries, laparoscopic surgery is the preferred approach for many abdominal conditions. Conventional laparoscopy is a complex intervention that is challenging to adopt and implement in low resource settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the clinical effectiveness of gasless laparoscopy compared to conventional laparoscopy with CO2 pneumoperitoneum and open surgery for general surgery and gynaecological procedures.

A search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, AJOL databases and Cochrane Library was performed from inception to January 2021. All randomised (RCTs) and comparative cohort (non-RCTs) studies comparing gasless laparoscopy with open surgery or conventional laparoscopy were included. The primary outcomes were mortality, conversion rates and intraoperative complications.

operative times and length of stay. The inverse variance random-effects model was used to synthesise data.

63 studies were included: 41 RCTs and 22 non-RCTs (3,620 patients). No procedure-related deaths were reported in the studies. For gasless vs conventional laparoscopy there was no difference in intraoperative complications for general RR 1.04 [CI 0.45-2.40] or gynaecological surgery RR 0.66 [0.14-3.13]. In the gasless laparoscopy group, the conversion rates for gynaecological surgery were high RR 11.72 [CI 2.26-60.87] when compared to conventional laparoscopy. For gasless vs open surgery, the operative times were longer for gasless surgery in general surgery RCT group MD (mean difference) 10 [CI 0.64, 19.36], but significantly shorter in the gynaecology RCT group MD - 18.74 [CI - 29.23, - 8.26]. For gasless laparoscopy vs open surgery non-RCT, the length of stay was shorter for gasless laparoscopy in general surgery MD - 3.94 [CI - 5.93, - 1.95] and gynaecology MD - 1.75 [CI - 2.64, - 0.86]. Overall GRADE assessment for RCTs and Non-RCTs was very low.

Gasless laparoscopy has advantages for selective general and gynaecological procedures and may have a vital role to play in low resource settings.

Benefits of laparoscopic surgery are well recognised but uptake in rural settings of low- and middle-income countries is limited due to implementation barriers. Gasless laparoscopy has been proposed as an alternative but requires a trained rural surgical workforce to upscale. This study evaluates a feasibility of implementing a structured laparoscopic training programme for rural surgeons of North-East India.

A 3-day training programme was held at Kolkata Medical College in March 2019. Laparoscopic knowledge and Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Skills (FLS) were assessed pre and post simulation training using multiple choice questions and the McGill Inanimate System for Training and Evaluation of Laparoscopic Skills (MISTELS), respectively. Competency with an abdominal lift device was assessed using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) and live operating performance via the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) scores during live surgery. Costs of the training programme and qualitative feedback were evaluated.

Seven rural surgeons participated. There was an improvement in knowledge acquisition (mean difference in MCQ score 5.57 (SD = 4.47)). The overall normalised mean MISTELS score for the FLS tasks improved from 386.02 (SD 110.52) pre-to 524.40 (SD 94.98) post-training (p = 0.09). Mean OSATS score was 22.4 out of 35 (SD 3.31) indicating competency with the abdominal lift device whilst a mean GOALS score of 16.42 out of 25 (SD 2.07) indicates proficiency in performing diagnostic laparoscopy using the gasless technique during live operating. Costs of the course were estimated at 354 USD for trainees and 461 USD for trainers.

Structured training programme in gasless laparoscopy improves overall knowledge and skills acquisition in laparoscopic surgery for rural surgeons of North-East India. It is feasible to deliver a training programme in gasless laparoscopy for rural surgeons. Larger studies are needed to assess the benefits for wider adoption in a similar context.