Postsurgical gastroparesis, resulting from surgical interventions on the stomach or vagal nerve injury, poses significant clinical challenges with patients presenting symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Although gastric electrical stimulation (GES) offers potential relief, its efficacy in refractory postsurgical gastroparesis requires further examination. This study evaluated the clinical response to GES in patients with refractory postsurgical gastroparesis.

A retrospective study was conducted across 2 study sites, involving 185 patients with drug-refractory postsurgical gastroparesis who underwent both temporary and permanent GES placements. Patients were categorized based on their surgical history: bariatric surgery, Nissen fundoplication, and others. The impact of GES was evaluated using Food and Drug Administration-compliant patient-reported outcomes scores and other relevant clinical metrics at baseline, after temporary GES placement, and 6 months after permanent GES placement. All 3 groups were also analyzed by the symptom improved group vs the unimproved group at baseline and 6 months after GES placement.

After GES implantation, all patient groups significantly improved upper gastrointestinal symptoms. The bariatric surgery group and Nissen fundoplication group specifically identified anorexia as the most severe symptom after GES after temporary GES placement among 3 groups (2.5 [0.4-3.5] and 1.5 [0.0-2.5], respectively). Nissen fundoplication patients had the highest score of anorexia among the 3 groups 6 months after GES (3.0 [2.0-3.5], P = .018). Despite these improvements, GES did not enhance gastric emptying test results. Symptomatic improvements were notably significant in patients who initially reported higher symptom severity than those who did not.

GES shows promise in alleviating symptoms of refractory postsurgical gastroparesis, particularly in those with severe initial symptoms. However, its impact on gastric emptying remains inconclusive. Further research is needed to establish GES as a standard treatment for postsurgical gastroparesis.

Surgical treatments of refractory gastroparesis include pyloromyotomy and gastric electrical stimulator (GES). It is unclear if patients may benefit from a combined approach with concomitant GES and pyloromyotomy.

Retrospective cohort analysis of all patients with refractory gastroparesis treated with GES implantation with and without concomitant pyloromyotomy at Cleveland Clinic Florida from January 2003 to January 2023. Primary endpoint was efficacy (clinical response duration and success rate) and secondary endpoints included safety (postoperative morbidity) and length of stay. Success rate was defined as the absence of one of the following reinterventions during follow-up: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), pyloromyotomy, GES removal.

During a period of 20 years, 134 patients were treated with GES implantation. Three patients with history of previous surgical pyloromyotomy or RYGB were excluded from the analysis. Median follow-up was 31 months (IQR 10, 72). Forty patients (30.5%) had GES with pyloromyotomy, whereas 91 (69.5%) did not have pyloromyotomy. Most of the patients had idiopathic (n = 68, 51.9%) or diabetic (n = 58, 43.3%) gastroparesis. Except for preoperative use of opioids (47.5 vs 14.3%; p < 0.001), patient's characteristics were similar in both groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of overall postoperative complications (17.5% vs 14.3%; p = 0.610), major postoperative complications (0% vs 2.2%; p = 1), and length of stay (2(IQR 1, 2) vs 2(IQR 1, 3) days; p = 0.068). At 5 years, success rate was higher in patients with than without pyloromyotomy however not statistically significant (82% versus 62%, p = 0.066). Especially patients with diabetic gastroparesis seemed to benefit from pyloromyotomy during GES (100% versus 67%, p = 0.053). In an adjusted Cox regression, GES implantation without pyloromyotomy was associated with a 2.66 times higher risk of treatment failure compared to GES implantation with pyloromyotomy (HR 2.66, 95% CI 1.03-6.94, p = 0.044).

Pyloromyotomy during GES implantation for gastroparesis seems to be associated with a longer clinical response with similar postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay than GES without pyloromyotomy. Patient with diabetic gastroparesis might benefit from a combination of GES implantation and pyloromyotomy.

Diabetic gastroparesis, a common complication of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), presents a significant treatment challenge. FoxiangSan is emerging as a potential therapy. FoxiangSan is a traditional Chinese medicine formula with the potential for treating diabetic gastroparesis by modulating gut microbiota and cAMP/PKA signaling pathways. This study explores the mechanisms behind FoxiangSan's effects on T2DM-induced gastroparesis, focusing on its impact on gut microbiota and the cAMP/PKA pathway. A rat model of type 2 diabetic gastroparesis was established through a high-fat diet and streptozotocin (STZ) injection, and the effects of FoxiangSan were assessed. Additionally, protein expression related to the cAMP/PKA pathway was examined, and FoxiangSan's influence on gut microbiota was studied using 16S rRNA sequencing. FoxiangSan significantly alleviated hyperglycemia, improved gastric pathology in rats with gastroparesis, enhanced the expression of 5-HT4, cAMP, PKA, and pPKA in the gastric antrum, and rebalanced gut microbiota. FoxiangSan demonstrates the therapeutic potential for T2DM-associated gastroparesis by modulating the cAMP/PKA pathway and gut microbiota.

Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are common, and they severely impair an individual's quality of life. The mechanism of pathogenesis and the effective treatments for FGIDs remain elusive. Neuromodulation-a relatively new treatment-has exhibited a good therapeutic effect on FGIDs, although there are different methods for different symptoms of FGIDs.

We used PubMed to review the history of neuromodulation for the treatment of FGIDs and to review several recently proposed neuromodulation approaches with improved effects on FGIDs.

Electroacupuncture, transcutaneous electroacupuncture, transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation, sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) (which relies on vagal nerve stimulation), and gastric electrical stimulation (which works through the modulation of slow waves generated by the interstitial cells of Cajal), in addition to the noninvasive neurostimulation alternative approach method of SNS-tibial nerve stimulation and transcutaneous electrical stimulation (which is still in its infancy), are some of the proposed neuromodulation approaches with improved effects on FGIDs. This review has discussed some critical issues related to the selection of stimulation parameters and the underlying mechanism and attempts to outline future research directions backed by the existing literature.

Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is currently used as an alternative treatment for medically refractory gastroparesis. GES has been initially developed to accelerate gastric motility, in order to relieve the symptoms of the patients. Subsequent studies, unfortunately, failed to demonstrate the acceleration of gastric emptying using high-frequency stimulation - low energy stimulation although the technique has shown a clinical impact with a reduction of nausea and vomiting for patients with gastroparesis. The present review details the clinical efficacy of GES in gastroparesis as well as its putative mechanisms of action.

Gastroparesis or gastric stasis is the delayed transit of the ingested contents through the stomach in the absence of mechanical obstruction. It can have multiple etiologies, most commonly idiopathic (ID) and diabetic (DM). Gastroparesis can cause significant distress to patients as it leads to symptoms like intractable nausea and vomiting, weight loss, abdominal bloating, early satiety, etc. The pathogenesis is mainly thought to be due to the dysfunction of the gastric pacemaker cells, i.e., interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC), and their interaction with the other gastric motor function regulatory components. There are several proposed treatment options for gastroparesis. Despite that, most patients remain refractory to medical treatment and require additional interventions for symptomatic relief. One such intervention is gastric electrical stimulation or gastric pacemaker, which aids in improving gastric motility. We have searched PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), Medline, Science Direct, and Google Scholar for articles pertaining to the use of gastric electrical stimulation in gastroparesis published in the last 10 years. The keywords used include "gastroparesis", "gastric stasis", "gastric pacemaker'', "gastric electrical stimulation", "nausea", "vomiting", "abdominal bloating", "gastric neuromodulation". We have finally included twelve studies that were the most relevant to our research question and met the quality assessment criteria. Exclusion criteria consisted of pediatric population studies, studies conducted on animals, books, and grey literature. Overall, these twelve studies helped evaluate the impact of gastric pacemakers on symptoms of gastroparesis like nausea, vomiting, weight loss, abdominal bloating, and quality of life. We found that most studies favored gastric pacemakers, improving the incidence of nausea and vomiting in patients with gastroparesis. There was a marked improvement in the BMI as well. On the other hand, most open-labeled studies showed improved quality of life and Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) scores, while randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses did not reflect the same result. In addition, some other parameters improved with gastric pacemakers, Inflammatory markers, insulin levels (especially in diabetics), and the number of hospitalizations. In conclusion, gastric pacemaker is a potential treatment option for patients with medically refractory gastroparesis. As noted from the results of our study, nausea/vomiting, weight loss, and overall GCSI scores have shown marked improvement with gastric electrical stimulation (GES). Nevertheless, more extensive research is needed to understand better the full extent of this device's use as a viable treatment option for patients suffering from gastroparesis.