1
|
Hida K, Okita Y, Fujii Y, Miyake T, Kuriu Y, Hidaka Y, Arita T, Kawaguchi K, Ochi S, Fujita Y, Obama K, Naitoh T, Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Surgical trend including minimally invasive surgeries for ulcerative colitis in the COSUC study: the largest multicenter cohort study in Japan. Surg Endosc 2025; 39:3911-3920. [PMID: 40355738 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-025-11758-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Collaborators] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2025] [Indexed: 05/14/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) is increasing rapidly in Asia. No large study has evaluated the clinical outcomes of hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). This study aimed to create a large database of the surgical outcomes of UC, present the trends of surgical procedures, and evaluate the impact of minimally invasive procedures on UC. METHODS Data of patients first treated from 2005 to 2019 were collected; two-staged surgery data were extracted, and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery (OS) outcomes were compared using propensity-score matching. RESULTS The data of 1558 cases were selected as the main analysis set. The number of surgical cases of UC has been increasing, with increasing proportion of MIS cases (2005: 43%, 2019: 84%). The median age of the patients increased in these 15 years (39.5-56 years old). Of 873 patients who underwent two-staged surgery, after 3:1 matching, 408 MIS and 176 OS cases were compared. Hand-sewn anastomoses were performed in 293 MIS (72.0%) and 142 OS-IPAA (80.7%) cases. The proportion of early complications (≥ Grade 3) did not vary between the two groups. Intraoperative blood loss was lower and blood transfusions were less frequent in the MIS group. CONCLUSIONS The proportion of MIS for UC has rapidly increased over the past 15 years. The total number of MIS and OS complications did not vary significantly between the groups. The short-term advantages of MIS include reduced blood loss and less necessity for blood transfusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koya Hida
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Yoshiki Okita
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan
| | - Yusuke Fujii
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Toru Miyake
- Department of Surgery, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Kuriu
- Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yu Hidaka
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Arita
- Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kiyotaka Kawaguchi
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Shingo Ochi
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Yusuke Fujita
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Kazutaka Obama
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Takeshi Naitoh
- Department of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
Collaborators
Nobuhisa Matsuhashi, Yudai Fukui, Shintaro Kohama, Manabu Takata, Shin Takesue, Fumihiko Fujita, Kohei Shigeta, Atsushi Kohyama, Toshifumi Watanabe, Yusuke Takahashi, Hirotoshi Kobayashi, Koji Daito, Chikayoshi Tani, Shintaro Akamoto, Fumitaka Asahara, Kiyoshi Maeda, Yusuke Mizuuchi, Hisanaga Horie, Takeru Matsuda, Toshihiro Nakao, Tatsuya Kinjo, Hiroomi Ogawa, Kazuyoshi Shiga, Tomonori Akagi, Koichi Okuya, Nobuki Ichikawa, Yoshiaki Takano, Yosuke Ohno, Kenji Baba, Kenji Kobayashi, Hiroshi Miyakita, Ryo Maemoto, Ryo Inada, Masayuki Kanzaki, Masaya Kawai, Yukiharu Hiyoshi, Yasuyuki Miyakura, Hiroshi Kuwabara, Keisuke Ihara, Kazuko Yokota, Atsushi Nishimura, Yukitoshi Todate, Akinobu Furutani, Tomoaki Okada,
Collapse
|
2
|
Maspero M, Hull TL. State of the Art: Pouch Surgery in the 21st Century. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:S1-S10. [PMID: 38441240 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An ileoanal pouch with IPAA is the preferred method to restore intestinal continuity in patients who require a total proctocolectomy. Pouch surgery has evolved during the past decades thanks to increased experience and research, changes in the medical management of patients who require an ileal pouch, and technological innovations. OBJECTIVE To review the main changes in pouch surgery over the past 2 decades, with a focus on staging, minimally invasive and transanal approaches, pouch design, and anastomotic configuration. RESULTS The decision on the staging approach depends on the patient's conditions, their indication for surgery, and the risk of anastomotic leak. A minimally invasive approach should be performed whenever feasible, but open surgery still has a role in this technically demanding operation. Transanal IPAA may be performed in experienced centers and may reduce conversion to open surgery in the hostile pelvis. The J-pouch is the easiest, fastest, and most commonly performed design, but other designs may be used when a J-pouch is not feasible. A stapled anastomosis without mucosectomy can be safely performed in the majority of cases, with a low incidence of rectal cuff neoplasia and better functional outcomes than handsewn. Finally, Crohn's disease is not an absolute contraindication to an ileoanal pouch, but pouch failure may be higher compared to other indications. CONCLUSIONS Many technical nuances contribute to the success of an ileoanal pouch. The current standard of care is a laparoscopic J-pouch with double-stapled anastomosis, but this should not be seen as a dogma, and the optimal approach and design should be tailored to each patient. See video from symposium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna Maspero
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lauricella S, Brucchi F, Cavalcoli F, Rausa E, Cassini D, Miccini M, Vitellaro M, Cirocchi R, Costa G. Current Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: New Insights on the Surgical Approaches. J Pers Med 2024; 14:580. [PMID: 38929801 PMCID: PMC11204779 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14060580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a life-threatening medical emergency with considerable morbidity. Despite recent advances in medical IBD therapy, colectomy rates for ASUC remain high. A scoping review of published articles on ASUC was performed. We collected data, such as general information of the disease, diagnosis and initial assessment, and available medical and surgical treatments focusing on technical aspects of surgical approaches. The most relevant articles were considered in this scoping review. The management of ASUC is challenging; currently, personalized treatment for it is unavailable. Sequential medical therapy should be administrated, preferably in high-volume IBD centers with close patient monitoring and indication for surgery in those cases with persistent symptoms despite medical treatment, complications, and clinical worsening. A total colectomy with end ileostomy is typically performed in the acute setting. Managing rectal stump is challenging, and all individual and technical aspects should be considered. Conversely, when performing elective colectomy for ASUC, a staged surgical procedure is usually preferred, thus optimizing the patients' status preoperatively and minimizing postoperative complications. The minimally invasive approach should be selected whenever technically feasible. Robotic versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has shown similar outcomes in terms of safety and postoperative morbidity. The transanal approach to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (Ta-IPAA) is a recent technique for creating an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis via a transanal route. Early experiences suggest comparable short- and medium-term functional results of the transanal technique to those of traditional approaches. However, there is a need for additional comparative outcomes data and a better understanding of the ideal training and implementation pathways for this procedure. This manuscript predominantly explores the surgical treatment of ASUC. Additionally, it provides an overview of currently available medical treatment options that the surgeon should reasonably consider in a multidisciplinary setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Lauricella
- Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Federica Cavalcoli
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Rausa
- Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Diletta Cassini
- General and Emergency Surgery, Sesto San Giovanni Hospital, 20099 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marco Vitellaro
- Colorectal Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Cirocchi
- Digestive and Emergency Surgery Unit, S. Maria Hospital Trust, 05100 Terni, Italy
| | - Gianluca Costa
- Department of Life Science, Health, and Health Professions, Link Campus University, 00165 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kucharzik T, Dignass A, Atreya R, Bokemeyer B, Esters P, Herrlinger K, Kannengiesser K, Kienle P, Langhorst J, Lügering A, Schreiber S, Stallmach A, Stein J, Sturm A, Teich N, Siegmund B. Aktualisierte S3-Leitlinie Colitis ulcerosa (Version 6.2). ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:769-858. [PMID: 38718808 DOI: 10.1055/a-2271-0994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- T Kucharzik
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Deutschland
| | - A Dignass
- Medizinische Klinik I, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - R Atreya
- Medizinische Klinik 1 Gastroent., Pneumologie, Endokrin., Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - B Bokemeyer
- Interdisziplinäres Crohn Colitis Centrum Minden - ICCCM, Minden, Deutschland
| | - P Esters
- Medizinische Klinik I, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - K Herrlinger
- Innere Medizin I, Asklepios Klinik Nord, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - K Kannengiesser
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Deutschland
| | - P Kienle
- Abteilung für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Theresienkrankenhaus, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - J Langhorst
- Klinik für Integrative Medizin und Naturheilkunde, Sozialstiftung Bamberg Klinikum am Bruderwald, Bamberg, Deutschland
| | - A Lügering
- Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Portal 10, Münster, Deutschland
| | - S Schreiber
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - A Stallmach
- Klinik für Innere Medizin IV Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland
| | - J Stein
- Abteilung Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, Krankenhaus Sachsenhausen, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - A Sturm
- Klinik für Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, DRK Kliniken Berlin Westend, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - N Teich
- Internistische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - B Siegmund
- Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Infektiologie und Rheumatologie, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mowlah RK, Soldera J. Risk and management of post-operative infectious complications in inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:2579-2595. [PMID: 38111772 PMCID: PMC10725545 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i11.2579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 08/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indications for surgery in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) include treatment-refractory disease or severe complications such as obstruction, severe colitis, dysplasia, or neoplasia. Infectious complications following colorectal surgery in IBD are significant, particularly in high-risk patients. AIM To gather evidence on risk factors associated with increased post-operative infectious complications in IBD and explore management strategies to reduce morbidity and mortality. METHODS A systematic review adhering to PRISMA-P guidelines was conducted. MEDLINE (PubMed) and Cochrane Library databases were searched using specific keywords. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies involving patients with IBD undergoing abdominal surgery with infectious complications within 30 d postoperatively. Exclusion criteria included patients under 18 years and non-infectious complications. Selected papers were analyzed to identify factors contributing to post-operative infections. A narrative analysis was performed to provide evidence-based recommendations for management. The data were then extracted and assessed based on the Reference Citation Analysis (https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/). RESULTS The initial database search yielded 1800 articles, with 330 articles undergoing full-text review. After excluding duplicates and irrelevant papers, 35 articles were included for analysis. Risk factors for post-operative complications in patients with IBD included hypoalbuminemia, malnutrition, preoperative abscess, and obesity. Perioperative blood transfusion was associated with increased infectious complications. Medications such as 5-aminosalicylates and immunomodulators did not increase post-operative complications. Corticosteroids were associated with an increased risk of complications. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab showed similar rates of infectious complications compared to other treatments. The impact of minimally invasive surgery on post-operative complications varied across studies. CONCLUSION In order to reduce post-operative infectious complications in patients with IBD, a comprehensive approach involving multiple disciplines is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jonathan Soldera
- Acute Medicine, University of South Wales, Cardiff CF37 1DL, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nozawa H, Sasaki K, Emoto S, Murono K, Yokoyama Y, Sonoda H, Nagai Y, Abe S, Ishihara S. Benefits of a laparoscopic approach for second colorectal resection after colectomy or proctectomy -a retrospective study. BMC Surg 2023; 23:216. [PMID: 37542231 PMCID: PMC10401843 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02111-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A laparoscopic approach generally provides several benefits in patients who undergo colon or rectal surgery without jeopardizing oncological outcomes. However, there is a paucity of studies on comparative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open approaches for second primary colorectal lesions after colectomy or proctectomy. METHODS From patients with colorectal disease who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2022 at our hospital, we collected 69 consecutive patients who had previous colorectal surgery for this retrospective study. Based on the second surgery approach (laparoscopic or open), patients were classified into the Lap (n = 37) or Op group (n = 32). Patients' baseline data and perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Four patients (11%) of the Lap group needed conversion to laparotomy. The intraoperative blood loss was lower in the Lap group than the Op group (median: 45 ml vs. 205 ml, p = 0.001). The time to first bowel movement was shorter in the Lap group than the Op group (median: 2.8 days vs. 3.6 days, p = 0.007). The operative time, frequencies of postoperative morbidities, and overall survival did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic surgery appeared feasible and beneficial for selected patients undergoing second colorectal resection after colectomy or proctectomy regarding blood loss and bowel function recovery without affecting other outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroaki Nozawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
| | - Kazuto Sasaki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Shigenobu Emoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Koji Murono
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Yokoyama
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Sonoda
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Yuzo Nagai
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Shinya Abe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Soichiro Ishihara
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kucharzik T, Dignass A, Atreya R, Bokemeyer B, Esters P, Herrlinger K, Kannengiesser K, Kienle P, Langhorst J, Lügering A, Schreiber S, Stallmach A, Stein J, Sturm A, Teich N, Siegmund B. [Not Available]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2023; 61:1046-1134. [PMID: 37579791 DOI: 10.1055/a-2060-0935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- T Kucharzik
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Deutschland
| | - A Dignass
- Medizinische Klinik I, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - R Atreya
- Medizinische Klinik 1 Gastroent., Pneumologie, Endokrin., Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - B Bokemeyer
- Interdisziplinäres Crohn Colitis Centrum Minden - ICCCM, Minden, Deutschland
| | - P Esters
- Medizinische Klinik I, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - K Herrlinger
- Innere Medizin I, Asklepios Klinik Nord, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - K Kannengiesser
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie, Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Deutschland
| | - P Kienle
- Abteilung für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Theresienkrankenhaus, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - J Langhorst
- Klinik für Integrative Medizin und Naturheilkunde, Sozialstiftung Bamberg Klinikum am Bruderwald, Bamberg, Deutschland
| | - A Lügering
- Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Portal 10, Münster, Deutschland
| | - S Schreiber
- Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - A Stallmach
- Klinik für Innere Medizin IV Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie, Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland
| | - J Stein
- Abteilung Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, Krankenhaus Sachsenhausen, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | - A Sturm
- Klinik für Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, DRK Kliniken Berlin Westend, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - N Teich
- Internistische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - B Siegmund
- Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Infektiologie und Rheumatologie, Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tubakihara H, Sawayama H, Komohara Y, Miyamoto Y, Ogawa K, Ohuchi M, Yoshida N, Baba H. A case of familial adenomatous polyposis with protein-losing enteropathy treated by laparoscopic total colorectal resection: A literature review. Asian J Endosc Surg 2023; 16:77-81. [PMID: 35778989 DOI: 10.1111/ases.13099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) with protein-losing enteropathy is a rare disorder and is difficult to treat medically. A 74-year-old female patient was referred to our hospital with a chief complaint of anorexia. Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy showed multiple adenomas from the ascending colon to the rectum and adenocarcinoma in the sigmoid colon and descending colon. Laboratory findings showed hypoalbuminemia (albumin 1.6 mg/dl). Protein leak scintigraphy using 99mTc-HSAD found a protein leak from the colon. Although hypercaloric infusion was administered, the nutritional status was not improved and albumin transfusion was required. The patient underwent laparoscopic total proctocolectomy, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, and temporary ileostomy. She had a good postoperative course and the hypoalbuminemia normalized in a few weeks. The patient underwent temporary ileostomy reversal. Here we report a case of FAP with protein-losing enteropathy who underwent laparoscopic total proctocolectomy, which resulted in improvement of the protein leak as well as cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Tubakihara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Sawayama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Komohara
- Department of Cell Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Yuji Miyamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Katsuhiro Ogawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Mayuko Ohuchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Naoya Yoshida
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nozawa H, Hata K, Sasaki K, Murono K, Kawai K, Emoto S, Ishihara S. Laparoscopic vs open restorative proctectomy after total abdominal colectomy for ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:1605-1612. [PMID: 35294600 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02492-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated that a laparoscopic approach provides short-term benefits, such as reduced blood loss and a shorter hospital stay, in patients who undergo rectal surgery. On the other hand, a few RCTs investigating proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) suggested limited advantages of laparoscopic surgery over open surgery. A substantial proportion of patients with UC or FAP may undergo staged operations with IPAA, but no study has compared the two approaches for proctectomy with IPAA after total abdominal colectomy. METHODS We examined 61 consecutive patients with UC or FAP who underwent proctectomy with IPAA after colectomy in our hospital. Patients were divided into the Lap group (n = 37) or the Op group (n = 24) according to surgical approach. Patient background and outcomes, such as operative time, blood loss, first bowel movement, postoperative complications, and pouchitis, were compared between these groups. RESULTS One patient required conversion to open surgery in the Lap group. The median volume of blood loss was 90 mL in the Lap group and 580 mL in the Op group (p < 0.0001). The Lap group showed a shorter time to first bowel movement than the Op group (median: 1 vs 2 days, p = 0.0003). The operative time, frequencies of postoperative complications, and accumulation rate of pouchitis were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic surgery was beneficial for patients undergoing restorative proctectomy in terms of blood loss and bowel recovery without increasing the operative time or rate of complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroaki Nozawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
| | - Keisuke Hata
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Kazuhito Sasaki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Koji Murono
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Kazushige Kawai
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Shigenobu Emoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Soichiro Ishihara
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Subtotal colectomy (STC) or total proctocolectomy (TPC) and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) performed in two or three stages remain the procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Minimally invasive laparoscopic approaches for STC and IPAA have been established for over a decade, having been shown to reduce postoperative pain, length of stay, and improve fertility. However "straight-stick" laparoscopy has ergonomic and visual disadvantages in the pelvis, which may contribute to IPAA failure. The robotic platform was developed to overcome these limitations. Robotic STC is associated with lower conversion rates and earlier return of bowel function with acceptably longer operative time (mean, 28 minutes) than laparoscopic STC. The robotic approach has also been shown in case series to be safe in urgent settings. Robotic IPAA is associated with lower blood loss and length of stay than laparoscopic IPAA. Robotic TPC/IPAA has been shown in small case series to be safe and feasible despite longer operating times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa Anderson
- Department of Surgery, Piedmont Hospital and Northside Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Alexis Grucela
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Northern Westchester Hospital, Mount Kisco, New York,Address for correspondence Alexis Grucela, MD, FACS, FASCRS Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Northern Westchester HospitalMount Kisco, NY 10549
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hagihara K, Mori R, Sekido Y, Ogino T, Hata T, Takahashi H, Miyoshi N, Uemura M, Doki Y, Eguchi H, Mizushima T. Defecation Function After Laparo-Assisted Restorative Proctocolectomy with Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021; 32:600-605. [PMID: 34569880 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2021.0465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Defecation status is an important determinant of quality of life. Previous studies showed that postoperative defecation disorders occurred after open surgery for ulcerative colitis (UC), but few have investigated defecation status after laparo-assisted surgery. The added precision and magnification provided with laparo-assisted surgery should lead to less damage to the anal sphincter muscle. This study investigated defecation function after a laparo-assisted restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). We also clarified factors that worsened defecation status. Methods: This retrospective study included 57 patients who underwent laparo-assisted RPC with IPAA for UC from January 2000 to May 2019. At 1 year after surgery, functional outcomes were evaluated with the Kirwan classification and Wexner score. Risk factors for poor defecation status were investigated with multiple regression. Results: At 1 year after surgery, the median Kirwan classification score was 2 and the median Wexner score was 8. Defecation disorder was observed in 19 (33.3%) patients, according to the Kirwan classification, and 15 (26.3%) patients, according to the Wexner score. Hand-sewn IPAA was associated with defecation disorder (P = .04), evaluated with the Kirwan classification. Hand-sewn IPAA (P = .01), older age (P = .03), high body mass index (P = .04), and the surgical indication (cancer/dysplasia; P = .03) were significantly associated with defecation disorder, evaluated with the Wexner score. The multivariable analysis showed that hand-sewn IPAA was an independent risk factor (P = .049; odds ratio: 4.99; 95% confidence interval: 1.0-28.39). Conclusions: We found that hand-sewn IPAA was a risk factor for defecation disorders after laparo-assisted RPC for UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiyotaka Hagihara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kawanishi City Hospital, Kawanishi, Japan
| | - Ryota Mori
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Yuki Sekido
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Takayuki Ogino
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
- Department of Therapeutics for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hata
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Hidekazu Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Norikatsu Miyoshi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Mamoru Uemura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Tsunekazu Mizushima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
- Department of Therapeutics for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lask A, Biebl M, Dittrich L, Fischer A, Adler A, Tacke F, Aigner F, Schmuck R, Chopra S, Knoop M, Pratschke J, Gül-Klein S. Safety of transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a retrospective observational cohort study. Patient Saf Surg 2021; 15:31. [PMID: 34537080 PMCID: PMC8449900 DOI: 10.1186/s13037-021-00306-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colectomy with transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (taIPAA) is a surgical technique that can be used to treat benign colorectal disease. Ulcerative colitis is the most frequent inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and although pharmacological therapy has improved, colectomy rates reach up to 15%. The objective of this study was to determine anastomotic leakage rates and treatment after taIPAA as well as short- and long-term pouch function. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospective database of all patients undergoing taIPAA at an academic tertiary referral center in Germany, between 01/03/2015 and 31/08/2019. Patients with indications other than ulcerative colitis or with adjuvant chemotherapy following colectomy for colorectal carcinoma were excluded for short- and long-term follow up due to diverging postoperative care yet considered for evaluation of anastomotic leakage. Results A total of 22 patients undergoing taIPAA during the study time-window were included in analysis. Median age at the time of surgery was 32 ± 12.5 (14–54) years. Two patients developed an anastomotic leakage at 11 days (early anastomotic leakage) and 9 months (late anastomotic leakage) after surgery, respectively. In both patients, pouches could be preserved with a multimodal approach. Twenty patients out of 22 met the inclusion criteria for short and long term follow-up. Data on short-term pouch function could be obtained in 14 patients and showed satisfactory pouch function with only four patients reporting intermittent incontinence at a median stool frequency of 9–10 times per day. In the long-term we observed an inflammation or “pouchitis” in 11 patients and a pouch failure in one patient. Conclusion Postoperative complication rates in patients with benign colorectal disease remain an area of concern for surgical patient safety. In this pilot study on 22 selected patients, taIPAA was associated with two patients developing anastomotic leakage. Future large-scale validation studies are required to determine the safety and feasibility of taIPAA in patients with ulcerative colitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aina Lask
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Matthias Biebl
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luca Dittrich
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Fischer
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin , Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Adler
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin , Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Tacke
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin , Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Aigner
- Department of Surgery, Barmherzige Brüder Krankenhaus Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Rosa Schmuck
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sascha Chopra
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Knoop
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Safak Gül-Klein
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kucharzik T, Dignass AU, Atreya R, Bokemeyer B, Esters P, Herrlinger K, Kannengießer K, Kienle P, Langhorst J, Lügering A, Schreiber S, Stallmach A, Stein J, Sturm A, Teich N, Siegmund B. [Not Available]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2020; 58:e241-e326. [PMID: 33260237 DOI: 10.1055/a-1296-3444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Torsten Kucharzik
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie, Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Deutschland
| | - Axel U Dignass
- Medizinische Klinik I, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| | - Raja Atreya
- Medizinische Klinik 1, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Bernd Bokemeyer
- Gastroenterologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Minden, Deutschland
| | - Philip Esters
- Medizinische Klinik I, Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| | | | - Klaus Kannengießer
- Klinik für Allgemeine Innere Medizin und Gastroenterologie, Klinikum Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Deutschland
| | - Peter Kienle
- Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Theresienkrankenhaus und Sankt Hedwig-Klinik GmbH, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - Jost Langhorst
- Klinik für Integrative Medizin und Naturheilkunde, Klinikum am Bruderwald, Bamberg, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Lügering
- Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Portal 10, Münster, Deutschland
| | | | - Andreas Stallmach
- Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Friedrich Schiller Universität, Jena, Deutschland
| | - Jürgen Stein
- Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, Krankenhaus Sachsenhausen, Frankfurt/Main, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Sturm
- Klinik für Innere Medizin mit Schwerpunkt Gastroenterologie, DRK Kliniken Berlin Westend, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Niels Teich
- Internistische Gemeinschaftspraxis für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Britta Siegmund
- Medizinische Klinik I, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Anderson M, Lynn P, Aydinli HH, Schwartzberg D, Bernstein M, Grucela A. Early experience with urgent robotic subtotal colectomy for severe acute ulcerative colitis has comparable perioperative outcomes to laparoscopic surgery. J Robot Surg 2019; 14:249-253. [PMID: 31076952 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-00968-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
It has been established that patients undergoing subtotal colectomy for UC benefit from a minimally invasive approach, despite the longer operating times associated with laparoscopic surgery when compared to open surgery (Andersson and Söderholm in Dig Dis 27(3):335-340, 2009; Telem et al. in Surg Endosc 24(7):1616-1620, 2010; Wu et al. in Int J Colorectal Dis 25(8):949-957, 2010). Our objective is to present our early experience with urgent robotic subtotal colectomy (RSTC) and compare them to a matched cohort of patients who underwent urgent laparoscopic subtotal colectomy (LSTC). A prospectively maintained institutional database was queried. Six RSTC patients and 13 LSTC patients were identified from 2015 to 2017. There was no difference in ASA score, body mass index, preoperative steroid use, c. difficile infection, or inflammatory markers between the groups. All patients in the robotic group and eight patients in the laparoscopic group received preoperative biologics. Neither group had intraoperative complications, open conversions, or 30-day mortality recorded. Robotic STC took 29 min longer (323.0 vs. 294.0 min, p = 0.3). There was no significant difference in blood loss between the two groups (80 ml vs. 75 ml p = 0.9). There were six postoperative complications (46%) in the laparoscopic group and 1 (20%) in the robotic group. Of these 23% (3/13) for LSTC and 0% (0/5) for RSTC were Grade III or higher. Two laparoscopic and 0 robotic patients required reoperation. The RSTC group had earlier stoma function (1.4 ± 0.8 days vs. 2 ± 1.3 days) and shorter LOS (3.4 ± 2 vs. 4.6 ± 3.2) than the LSTC group, but these did not reach statistical significance. In conclusion, urgent robotic subtotal colectomy for UC is safe and offers technical advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa Anderson
- Colon and Rectal Surgery, New York University Langone Health, 550 First Avenue Suite 7V, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Patricio Lynn
- Colon and Rectal Surgery, New York University Langone Health, 550 First Avenue Suite 7V, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Huriye Hande Aydinli
- Colon and Rectal Surgery, New York University Langone Health, 550 First Avenue Suite 7V, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - David Schwartzberg
- Colon and Rectal Surgery, New York University Langone Health, 550 First Avenue Suite 7V, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Mitchell Bernstein
- Colon and Rectal Surgery, New York University Langone Health, 550 First Avenue Suite 7V, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Alexis Grucela
- Colon and Rectal Surgery, New York University Langone Health, 550 First Avenue Suite 7V, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Baek SJ, Lee KY, Song KH, Yu CS. Current Status and Trends in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery in Korea: Analysis of Data in a Nationwide Registry. Ann Coloproctol 2018; 34:299-305. [PMID: 30630303 PMCID: PMC6347339 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2018.07.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Korea has been increasing in recent years, but accurate statistics about operations for IBD are lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the trends and current status of IBD surgeries in Korea. Methods Using a national database from the Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, we analyzed data from patients who underwent surgery for Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis from January 2009 to October 2016. Results The mean number of patients who underwent surgery for Crohn disease was 791.8 per year. Colorectal surgery, small bowel surgery, and anal surgery were performed fairly often (31.2%, 29.4%, 39.4%, respectively), and laparoscopic surgery continued to increase, recently exceeding 30%. About 50% of Crohn patients used biologics before and after surgery, and those patients also underwent a relatively high rate of anal surgeries (44.2%). The mean number of patients who underwent surgery for ulcerative colitis was 247.6 per year. Colorectal surgery accounted for more than half of all operations, and laparoscopic surgery has been increasing rapidly, having been performed in about 60% of patients in recent years. The incidence of colorectal cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis was very high and increased rapidly during the study period, reaching about 80%. Conclusion The number of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for IBD in Korea has increased significantly. Biologics are actively used by patients with Crohn disease, with a high proportion of anal surgeries required. Many of the surgical indications for ulcerative colitis have shifted into colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Se-Jin Baek
- Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kil Yeon Lee
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Chang Sik Yu
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
Renshaw S, Silva IL, Hotouras A, Wexner SD, Murphy J, Bhan C. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of robotic colorectal resections for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic literature review. Tech Coloproctol 2018; 22:161-177. [PMID: 29546470 PMCID: PMC5862938 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1766-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Accepted: 02/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess outcome measures and cost-effectiveness of robotic colorectal resections in adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The Cochrane Library, PubMed/Medline and Embase databases were reviewed, using the text "robotic(s)" AND ("inflammatory bowel disease" OR "Crohn's" OR "Ulcerative Colitis"). Two investigators screened abstracts for eligibility. All English language full-text articles were reviewed for specified outcomes. Data were presented in a summarised and aggregate form, since the lack of higher-level evidence studies precluded meta-analysis. Primary outcomes included mortality and postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes included readmission rate, length of stay, conversion rate, procedure time, estimated blood loss and functional outcome. The tertiary outcome was cost-effectiveness. Eight studies (3 case-matched observational studies, 4 case series and 1 case report) met the inclusion criteria. There was no reported mortality. Overall, complications occurred in 81 patients (54%) including 30 (20%) Clavien-Dindo III-IV complications. Mean length of stay was 8.6 days. Eleven cases (7.3%) were converted to open. The mean robotic operating time was 99 min out of a mean total operating time of 298.6 min. Thirty-two patients (24.7%) were readmitted. Functional outcomes were comparable among robotic, laparoscopic and open approaches. Case-matched observational studies comparing robotic to laparoscopic surgery revealed a significantly longer procedure time; however, conversion, complication, length of stay and readmission rates were similar. The case-matched observational study comparing robotic to open surgery also revealed a longer procedure time and a higher readmission rate; postoperative complication rates and length of stay were similar. No studies compared cost-effectiveness between robotic and traditional approaches. Although robotic resections for inflammatory bowel disease are technically feasible, outcomes must be interpreted with caution due to low-quality studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Renshaw
- Department of Surgery, Whittington Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - I L Silva
- Department of Surgery, Whittington Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - A Hotouras
- National Centre for Bowel Research and Surgical Innovation, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. .,Department of Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, London, UK.
| | - S D Wexner
- Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - J Murphy
- Department of Surgery, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - C Bhan
- Department of Surgery, Whittington Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
何 安, 刘 刚. 溃疡性结肠炎的外科微创治疗. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2017; 25:2088-2094. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v25.i23.2088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
外科治疗是溃疡性结肠炎(ulcerative colitis, UC)的重要组成部分, 全结直肠切除、回肠贮袋肛管吻合术(ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, IPAA)已成为标准术式. 近年来在微创外科技术的迅猛发展与普及下, 越来越多医疗中心开展腹腔镜IPAA手术. 腹腔镜IPAA手术相比于开腹手术的在术后近、远期疗效中的优势逐渐突显, 且其安全有效性已达成共识. 目前更多更为微创的技术也陆续尝试应用于IPAA手术. 但是由于UC患者自身疾病的特点和IPAA术式的复杂性, 腹腔镜IPAA手术仍未达到标准化、规范化水平. 本文主要针对UC微创外科术后疗效和合理应用的研究进展作一述评.
Collapse
|
19
|
Baek SJ, Lightner AL, Boostrom SY, Mathis KL, Cima RR, Pemberton JH, Larson DW, Dozois EJ. Functional Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Patients with Chronic Ulcerative Colitis: Long-Term Follow-up of a Case-Matched Study. J Gastrointest Surg 2017; 21:1304-1308. [PMID: 28470559 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3411-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2017] [Accepted: 03/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (L-IPAA) has been increasingly adopted over the last decade due to short-term patient-related benefits. Several studies have shown L-IPAA to be equivalent to open IPAA in terms of safety and short-term outcomes. However, few L-IPAA studies have examined long-term functional outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the long-term functional outcomes of L-IPAA as compared to open IPAA. METHODS A previous case-matched cohort study at our institution compared short-term outcomes between L-IPAA and open IPAA from 1998 to 2004. For this study, we selected all patients from this case-matched cohort study with chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC) who had follow-up functional data of greater than 1 year. Functional data was obtained through prospective surveys, which were sent annually to all IPAA patients postoperatively. RESULTS One hundred and forty-nine patients (58 L-IPAA, 91 open IPAA) with a median 8-year duration of follow-up were identified. There were no differences in demographics and long-term surgical outcomes between groups. Stapled anastomosis was more common in the laparoscopic group (91.4 versus 54.9%, p < 0.001). Stool frequency during daytime (>6 stools, L-IPAA 32.8%, open 49.4%, p = 0.048) and nighttime (>2 stools, L-IPAA 13.8%, open 30.6%; p = 0.024) was significantly lower in the L-IPAA group. Ability to differentiate gas from stool was not different (p = 0.13). Rate of complete continence was similar in L-IPAA and open groups (L-IPAA 36.2%, open 21.8%, p = 0.060). There was no difference in use of medication to control stools, perianal skin irritation, voiding difficulty, sexual problems, and occupational change between groups. Subgroup analysis to evaluate for any group differences attributable to anastomotic technique demonstrated only that stapled anastomoses lead to more perianal skin irritation in the L-IPAA group (L-IPAA = 60.4% versus open IPAA = 38.8%; p = 0.031). CONCLUSION Overall, L-IPAA has comparable functional results to the open approach with slightly lower daytime and nighttime stool frequency. This difference may be attributed to a greater number of stapled anastomoses performed in the laparoscopic cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Se-Jin Baek
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| | | | - Kellie L Mathis
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Robert R Cima
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - John H Pemberton
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - David W Larson
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Eric J Dozois
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lightner AL, Pemberton JH, Dozois EJ, Larson DW, Cima RR, Mathis KL, Pardi DS, Andrew RE, Koltun WA, Sagar P, Hahnloser D. The surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease. Curr Probl Surg 2017; 54:172-250. [PMID: 28576304 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2017.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Amy L Lightner
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| | - John H Pemberton
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Eric J Dozois
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - David W Larson
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Robert R Cima
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Kellie L Mathis
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Darrell S Pardi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Rachel E Andrew
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA
| | - Walter A Koltun
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA
| | - Peter Sagar
- Division of Colorecal surgery, St. James University Hospital, Leeds, England
| | - Dieter Hahnloser
- Division of Colorecal surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Current status of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the emergency setting. Updates Surg 2016; 68:47-52. [DOI: 10.1007/s13304-016-0356-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2015] [Accepted: 02/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
22
|
Homma S, Kawamata F, Shibasaki S, Kawamura H, Takahashi N, Taketomi A. Does reduced-port laparoscopic surgery for medically uncontrolled ulcerative colitis do more harm than good? Asian J Endosc Surg 2016; 9:24-31. [PMID: 26490730 DOI: 10.1111/ases.12250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2015] [Revised: 08/02/2015] [Accepted: 09/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Reduced-port laparoscopic surgery is a novel minimally invasive surgery. However, reduced-port surgery for ulcerative colitis (UC) remains controversial. Here, we describe the clinical outcomes of single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery (SILS + 1) for medically uncontrolled UC. METHODS Between May 2011 and September 2014, 10 UC patients underwent SILS + 1 port surgery. All procedures were performed with the use of a SILS port and either a 5-mm or a 12-mm port placed at the planned ileostomy site. RESULTS The median age of patients was 32 years (range, 22-53 years). Six patients underwent two-stage SILS + 1 port restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, two patients underwent SILS + 1 total proctocolectomy, and the remaining two patients underwent SILS + 1 subtotal colectomy with subsequent three-stage SILS + 1 ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The median operative time was 363.1 min (range, 253-465 min) and the median estimated blood loss was 29 mL (range, 0-100 mL). There were no conversions or additional ports required. Two patients previously underwent SILS + 1 subtotal colectomy, and in one of those patients, SILS + 1 ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was performed successfully 6 months after the previous surgery. There were no intra-abdominal adhesions, and no extra wounds were necessary because the previous stoma site had been used to access the SILS port. The median postoperative period was 24 months, during which five patients had their ileostomies closed. No patients reported occasional minor daily soiling or the need to wear a pad. CONCLUSION Reduced-port laparoscopic surgery for medically uncontrolled UC is a feasible and safe procedure when performed by skilled surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shigenori Homma
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Futoshi Kawamata
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Susumu Shibasaki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hideki Kawamura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Norihiko Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Akinobu Taketomi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
An enhanced recovery after surgery strategy will be increasingly adopted in the era of value-based care. The various elements in each enhanced recovery after surgery protocol are likely to add value to the overall patient surgical journey. Although the evidence varies considerably based on type of surgery and patient group, the team-based approach of care should be universally applied to patient care. This article provides an overview of up-to-date techniques and methodology for enhanced recovery, including an overview of value-based care, delivery, and the evidence base supporting enhanced recovery after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arvind Chandrakantan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook Medicine, HSC Level 4, Room 060, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8480, USA
| | - Tong Joo Gan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, HSC Level 4, Room 060, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8480, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kuroyanagi H, Inomata M, Saida Y, Hasegawa S, Funayama Y, Yamamoto S, Sakai Y, Watanabe M. Gastroenterological Surgery: Large intestine. Asian J Endosc Surg 2015; 8:246-62. [PMID: 26303730 DOI: 10.1111/ases.12222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2015] [Revised: 04/10/2015] [Accepted: 04/10/2015] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
25
|
Jani K, Shah A. Laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. J Minim Access Surg 2015; 11:177-183. [PMID: 26195875 PMCID: PMC4499922 DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.140212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2014] [Accepted: 06/14/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM The aim was to study the feasibility of the laparoscopic approach in the management of ulcerative colitis, to assess the functional results at 1-year and to review of literature on the topic. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients presenting for surgical management of histopathologically proven ulcerative colitis during the study period were included in the study. All patients presenting in a non-emergency setting were offered a two-stage procedure (Group A). The first-stage consisted of laparoscopic total proctocolectomy (TPC) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) with a diverting split end ileostomy. Ileostomy was closed in the second stage. For patients presenting in acute setting (Group B), the first-stage consisted of laparoscopic TPC with end ileostomy followed by IPAA with diverting split end ileostomy in the second-stage and finally ileostomy closure in the third-stage. The technique is described. RESULTS A total of 31 cases underwent laparoscopic TPC-IPAA, of which 28 belonged to Group A and 3 were included in Group B. All surgeries were successfully completed laparoscopically without need for conversion. The average operating time was 375 min in Group A (range: 270-500 min) and 390 min in Group B (range: 250-480 min). Oral diet was resumed at a mean of 3.4 days (range: 1.5-6 days) and the mean hospital stay was 8.2 days (range: 4-26 days). Overall morbidity rate was 16.2%; re-operation rate was 9.7% while mortality was nil. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic TPC-IPAA is feasible in acute as well as non-acute setting in patients needing surgical management of ulcerative colitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalpesh Jani
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Minimal Access Surgery, SIGMA, Baroda, Gujarat, India
| | - Amit Shah
- Department of Anesthesia, SIGMA, Baroda, Gujarat, India
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Delaney J, Laws P, Wille-Jørgensen P, Engel A. Inflammatory bowel disease meta-evidence and its challenges: is it time to restructure surgical research? Colorectal Dis 2015; 17:600-11. [PMID: 25546572 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2014] [Accepted: 11/12/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to compare the methodological quality and input paper characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses reported in the medical and surgical literature by performing a systematic 'overview of reviews'. Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) were used as the framework for this comparison as they are relatively common serious conditions, with both medical and surgical options for therapy. METHOD Medline, Embase, CINHAL and the Cochrane Database were searched to November 2013. Eligible papers were systematic reviews or meta-analyses that considered a question of therapy in CD or UC. Two independent reviewers selected the papers, extracted the data and scored their methodology using the AMSTAR scoring system. The papers were categorized into medical therapy (M), surgical therapy (S) or medical and surgical therapy (MS) groups. Following retrieval of the sample of meta-evidence papers, the original input studies used in their creation were identified and a search of Medline, Embase, CINHAL and the Cochrane Database was performed. A team of researchers then examined the collection of papers for bibliographic and financial information. RESULTS Five hundred papers were identified in the meta-evidence search, of which 118 were deemed eligible. There was a difference in the AMSTAR-rated average quality of the papers between the S and M group (S 7.36 vs M 8.75, P = 0.01). On average S papers were published in journals with a lower impact factor (S 3.26, M 5.04, MS 5.30, P < 0.001). S papers also showed more heterogeneity (I(2) ; S 37%, M 24%, MS 10%, P < 0.001). Some 25% of S meta-analyses used data-sets with significant heterogeneity (I(2) > 75%), compared with 8% of M meta-analyses and 3% of the MS meta-analyses. Some 5% of S papers were done on data sets that had I(2) values > 90%. There was no difference in the average number of papers assessed in each group, the average number of patients per meta-paper, the average time covered by the reviews, the average number of papers considered within each meta-analysis, or the average number of patients considered within each meta-analysis. Considering the conclusions of each meta-analysis, S meta-evidence was 50% more likely than M meta-evidence to be unable to make recommendations for practice. A total of 1499 original input papers were identified, of which 283 were used in more than one review. Within the non-repeated papers (n = 1023) the average impact factor within the S group was lower than that of the M and the MS groups (3.720 vs 11.230 vs 7.563, respectively; ANOVAP < 0.001). M papers had higher rates of pharmaceutical sponsorship than S papers (M 56% vs S 1%) and twice the level of government support (M 16% vs S 8%). Of note, 21% of M papers had corporate sponsorship but did not list any conflict of interest. CONCLUSION Compared with M meta-analyses, S meta-analyses in the UC and CD domain are more likely to be of poorer methodological quality, are of a greater degree of heterogeneity and less often offer a positive conclusion. The papers used to generate meta-evidence in M papers have a greater degree of corporate and government sponsorship, and are more likely to come from journals with higher impact factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Delaney
- Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - P Laws
- Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - P Wille-Jørgensen
- Abdominal Disease Center K, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A Engel
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease is a challenging endeavor given infectious and inflammatory complications, such as fistula, and abscess, complex often postoperative anatomy, including adhesive disease from previous open operations. Patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis also bring to the table the burden of their chronic illness with anemia, malnutrition, and immunosuppression, all common and contributing independently as risk factors for increased surgical morbidity in this high-risk population. However, to reduce the physical trauma of surgery, technologic advances and worldwide experience with minimally invasive surgery have allowed laparoscopic management of patients to become standard of care, with significant short- and long-term patient benefits compared with the open approach. In this review, we will describe the current state-of the-art for minimally invasive surgery for inflammatory bowel disease and the caveats inherent with this practice in this complex patient population. Also, we will review the applicability of current and future trends in minimally invasive surgical technique, such as laparoscopic "incisionless," single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), robotic-assisted, and other techniques for the patient with inflammatory bowel disease. There can be no doubt that minimally invasive surgery has been proven to decrease the short- and long-term burden of surgery of these chronic illnesses and represents high-value care for both patient and society.
Collapse
|
28
|
Tajti J, Simonka Z, Paszt A, Ábrahám S, Farkas K, Szepes Z, Molnár T, Nagy F, Lázár G. Role of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of ulcerative colitis; short- and mid-term results. Scand J Gastroenterol 2015; 50:406-12. [PMID: 25615512 DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2014.985705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Laparoscopy is used more widely for the surgery of ulcerative colitis. The objective of this study was a comparison of the surgical and 3-year follow-up results of patients treated with conventional and minimally invasive methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 45 patients received surgery for ulcerative colitis, 16 as emergency and 29 as elective cases. Laparoscopy was used in 23 and a conventional method in 22 cases. No difference was found between the two groups from the aspects of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) class, mean body mass index (BMI) and age. There were 4 emergency cases in the laparoscopy group, and 12 in the open group. Nineteen elective surgeries were performed in the laparoscopy group, and 10 in the open group. RESULTS There was no significant difference between the groups as concerns the length of hospital or intensive care unit (ICU) stay, the time to bowel function recovery, but the duration of open surgery was significantly shorter. There was no difference between the groups in the rate of early postoperative complications, whereas among potential late complications, the rates of intestinal obstruction (8.7% vs. 45%) and a septic condition (0% vs. 27%) were significantly lower in the laparoscopy group. There was a significant improvement in the quality of life after surgery in both groups, and better cosmetic results were observed in the laparoscopy group. CONCLUSION Laparoscopy can be used for ulcerative colitis both emergency and elective cases, it provides a good quality of life and the mid-term rate of complications is lower as compared with open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- János Tajti
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged , Szeged , Hungary
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sameshima S, Koketsu S, Takeshita E, Kubota Y, Okuyama T, Saito K, Ueda Y, Sawada T, Oya M. Surgical resections of ulcerative colitis associated with dysplasia or carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 2015; 13:70. [PMID: 25884202 PMCID: PMC4340839 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-015-0499-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2014] [Accepted: 02/01/2015] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ulcerative colitis (UC) patients have an increased risk of colorectal dysplasia and carcinoma. The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical features and surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis associated with dysplasia or carcinoma. METHODS We operated on 41 UC patients since April 2000. Twelve of the cases were associated with dysplasia or carcinoma. Ten patients were male and two were female; the median age was 58.0 years, and the average duration of disease was 19.2 years. Nine cases were pancolitis type and three were left-sided type. Six cases were remission-relapsing type and six were chronic inflammation type. In 10 of 12 cases, dysplasia or carcinoma was diagnosed before the operations. Nine cases were primary operations and two were second-time operations. RESULTS Among ten patients who underwent primary operations, four patients had open surgery and six patients had hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS). Seven patients received anus/anal sphincter-preserving operations with reconstruction by the ileal pouch technique. Ileal pouch anal-canal anastomosis (IPACA) was performed in five cases and ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) in two cases. Abdomino-peritoneal resection was performed in two cases, proctcolectomy with permanent ileostomy in one case, and right hemicolectomy in one case. A 39-year-old patient was unresectable due to dissemination of the carcinoma. A 55-year-old patient who underwent IPACA showed night soiling postoperatively. Other patients who received IPAA and IPACA showed favorable anal function postoperatively. Histological examination showed low-grade dysplasia in two cases, high-grade dysplasia in three cases, and adenocarcinoma in seven cases. In the seven cases of adenocarcinoma, four, two, and one cases were stage 1, 3, and 4 according to TNM classification. Three of five cases with dysplasia were detected by surveillance colonoscopy. All patients with carcinoma were symptomatic and did not undergo surveillance colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS IPACA by HALS was safely performed as an anal-preserving operation in UC patients with dysplasia or carcinoma. Non-anal-preserving operations for aged patients showed a preferable postoperative course. Surveillance colonoscopy is essential for detecting dysplasia before the development of carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinichi Sameshima
- Department of Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Koshigaya Hospital, 2-1-50, Minami Koshigaya, Koshigaya, Saitama, 343-8555, Japan.
| | - Shinichiro Koketsu
- Department of Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Koshigaya Hospital, 2-1-50, Minami Koshigaya, Koshigaya, Saitama, 343-8555, Japan.
| | - Emiko Takeshita
- Department of Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Koshigaya Hospital, 2-1-50, Minami Koshigaya, Koshigaya, Saitama, 343-8555, Japan.
| | - Yawara Kubota
- Department of Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Koshigaya Hospital, 2-1-50, Minami Koshigaya, Koshigaya, Saitama, 343-8555, Japan.
| | - Takashi Okuyama
- Department of Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Koshigaya Hospital, 2-1-50, Minami Koshigaya, Koshigaya, Saitama, 343-8555, Japan.
| | - Kazuyuki Saito
- Department of Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Koshigaya Hospital, 2-1-50, Minami Koshigaya, Koshigaya, Saitama, 343-8555, Japan.
| | - Yoshihiko Ueda
- Department of Pathology, Dokkyo Medical University Koshigaya Hospital, 2-1-50, Minami Koshigaya, Koshigaya, Saitama, 343-8555, Japan.
| | - Toshio Sawada
- Department of Medical Examination, Shiba Park Clinic, 2-4-1 Shibakouen, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0011, Japan.
| | - Masatoshi Oya
- Department of Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Koshigaya Hospital, 2-1-50, Minami Koshigaya, Koshigaya, Saitama, 343-8555, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chand M, Siddiqui MRS, Gupta A, Rasheed S, Tekkis P, Parvaiz A, Mirnezami AH, Qureshi T. Systematic review of emergent laparoscopic colorectal surgery for benign and malignant disease. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:16956-63. [PMID: 25493008 PMCID: PMC4258564 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.16956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2014] [Revised: 05/31/2014] [Accepted: 07/22/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic surgery has become well established in the management of both and malignant colorectal disease. The last decade has seen increasing numbers of surgeons trained to a high standard in minimally-invasive surgery. However there has not been the same enthusiasm for the use of laparoscopy in emergency colorectal surgery. There is a perception that emergent surgery is technically more difficult and may lead to worse outcomes. The present review aims to provide a comprehensive and critical appraisal of the available literature on the use of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) in the emergency setting. The literature is broadly divided by the underlying pathology; that is, inflammatory bowel disease, diverticulitis and malignant obstruction. There were no randomized trials and the majority of the studies were case-matched series or comparative studies. The overall trend was that LCS is associated with shorter hospital stay, par or fewer complications but an increased operating time.Emergency LCS can be safely undertaken for both benign and malignant disease providing there is appropriate patient selection, the surgeon is adequately experienced and there are sufficient resources to allow for a potentially more complex operation.
Collapse
|
31
|
Hata K, Kazama S, Nozawa H, Kawai K, Kiyomatsu T, Tanaka J, Tanaka T, Nishikawa T, Yamaguchi H, Ishihara S, Sunami E, Kitayama J, Watanabe T. Laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: a review of the literature. Surg Today 2014; 45:933-8. [PMID: 25346254 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-014-1053-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2014] [Accepted: 09/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Despite the development of new therapies, including anti-TNF alpha antibodies and immunosuppressants, a substantial proportion of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) still require surgery. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch anal anastomosis is the standard surgical treatment of choice for UC. With the advent of laparoscopic techniques for colorectal surgery, ileal-pouch anal anastomosis has also been performed laparoscopically. This paper reviews the history and current trends in laparoscopic surgery for UC. The accumulation of experience and improvement of laparoscopic devices have shifted the paradigm of UC surgery towards laparoscopic surgery over the past decade. Although laparoscopic surgery requires a longer operation, it provides significantly better short and long-term outcomes. The short-term benefits of laparoscopic surgery over open surgery include shorter hospital stays and fasting times, as well as better cosmesis. The long-term benefits of laparoscopy include better fecundity in young females. Some surgeons favor laparoscopic surgery even for severe acute colitis. More efforts are being made to develop newer laparoscopic methods, such as reduced port surgery, including single incision laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keisuke Hata
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Seifarth C, Ritz JP, Kroesen A, Buhr HJ, Groene J. Effects of minimizing access trauma in laparoscopic colectomy in patients with IBD. Surg Endosc 2014; 29:1413-8. [PMID: 25159650 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3817-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2014] [Accepted: 08/08/2014] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic interventions to minimize access trauma are increasingly gaining importance for both cosmetic reasons and lower postoperative morbidity. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes for different laparoscopic colectomy and proctocolectomy accesses considering IBD. A comparison was made between total laparoscopic (LR)-without an extra incision for sample--and laparoscopic-assisted resection using a small incision for retrieval of the specimen (LAR) PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2006 to 2012, 109 IBD patients underwent minimal invasive total colectomy or proctocolectomy. Patients were subdivided according to access into LR and LAR. Perioperative outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS 86 patients with Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and 23 with Crohn's disease (CD) were included (LR: 64 UC/13 CD, LAR: 22 UC/10 CD). Among them, there were no differences in age, BMI, sex, ASA score or pre-existing immunosuppression. Patients with LR and UC had a higher disease activity score (Truelove III LR: 42 %, LAR: 5 %; p = 0.005). The Crohn's Disease Activity Index did not differ. Patients with LR had a shorter operating time (LR: 211.5, LAR: 240 min; p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in hospital stay (LR: 11, LAR: 12.5 days; p ≥ 0.05), length of stay at the ICU (both 1 days; p ≥ 0.05), duration of required analgesia (LR: 7 days, LAR: 8 days; p ≥ 0.05), and nutritional build-up (both 5 days; p ≥ 0.05). Groups had the same overall complication rate, but surgical site infection rates tended to be higher in patients with LAR (LR: 9.1 %, LAR: 21.9 %, p = 0.07). DISCUSSION Laparoscopic procedures for colectomy and proctocolectomy are safe and effective techniques for patients with colon involvement and IBD. Minimizing the access trauma in laparoscopic colectomy offers a potential advantage of reduced surgical site infections, especially for frequently immunosuppressed IBD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Seifarth
- Department of Surgery, Chirurgische Klinik I, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany,
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
A comparison of outcomes for adults and children undergoing resection for inflammatory bowel disease: is there a difference? ISRN GASTROENTEROLOGY 2014; 2014:410753. [PMID: 25006470 PMCID: PMC4005026 DOI: 10.1155/2014/410753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2013] [Accepted: 01/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Background. The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing in the paediatric population. Since 2007, a single surgeon whose main practice is in the treatment of adults has performed surgery for IBD in adults and children within two dedicated multidisciplinary teams. Our aim was to assess and compare outcomes for adults and children following surgery for IBD. Methods. Analysis of a prospectively collected database was carried out to include all patients who had undergone resectional surgery for IBD between 2007 and 2012. Results. 48 adults and 30 children were included in the study. Median age for children was 14 years (range 8–16) and for adults was 33.5 years (range 17–64). Median BMI was 23 (range 18–38) and 19 (range 13–29.5) in adults and children, respectively (P < 0.001). Laparoscopic resection was performed in 27 (90%) children and 36 (75%) adults. Postoperative complication rates were comparable, 11 (23%) in adults versus 6 (20%) in children (P = 1.00). Conclusion. Resectional surgery for IBD in children has outcomes that compare favourably with the adult population, with the majority of cases being performed by a laparoscopic approach.
Collapse
|
34
|
Kawamura J, Hasegawa S, Kawada K, Yamaguchi T, Nagayama S, Matsusue R, Nomura A, Sakai Y. Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for severe ulcerative colitis. Asian J Endosc Surg 2013; 6:271-8. [PMID: 23809786 DOI: 10.1111/ases.12046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2013] [Revised: 05/07/2013] [Accepted: 05/19/2013] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The laparoscopic approach is accepted as a treatment option for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who are otherwise in good health. However, its application for patients with severe UC remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the laparoscopic approach for severe UC cases. Short- and long-term clinical outcomes after laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were compared between severe and mild-to-intermediate UC patients. METHODS Cases treated between March 2002 and September 2010 were retrieved retrospectively from the database of Kyoto Medical Center and Kyoto University Hospital. Intraoperative complications and short- and long-term clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS A total of 31 patients underwent laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A comparison of short- and long-term clinical outcomes after one- or two-stage laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis between severe (n = 7) and mild-to-intermediate (n = 21) UC patients revealed no significant differences. The proportion of patients with restoration of intestinal continuity did not differ between the groups (severe: 86%, mild to intermediate: 95%; P = 0.69). CONCLUSION The present findings suggest that laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for severe UC patients could be a good alternative approach when performed by an experienced hand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junichiro Kawamura
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Department of Surgery, Shiga Medical Center for Adults, Moriyama, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, Fearon KCH, Norderval S, Lobo DN, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Ramirez J. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations. World J Surg 2013; 37:285-305. [PMID: 23052796 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1787-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 319] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
36
|
Laparoscopic versus conventional ileoanal pouch procedure in patients undergoing elective restorative proctocolectomy (LapConPouch Trial)—a randomized controlled trial. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2013; 398:807-16. [DOI: 10.1007/s00423-013-1088-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2012] [Accepted: 05/01/2013] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
37
|
Han Y, Lin MB, He YG, Zhang HB, Zhang YJ, Yin L. Laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease--the experience in China. J INVEST SURG 2013; 26:180-5. [PMID: 23514051 DOI: 10.3109/08941939.2012.732664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has risen rapidly in China over the last 15 years. Increasing numbers of people with IBD require surgery during their lifetime, but few reports of IBD in Eastern populations have been described to date. The aim of this study was to assess the short-term effects of the laparoscopic surgery for IBD in Chinese patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS From February 2010 to March 2012, 35 patients with IBD underwent laparoscopic operations and the clinical data obtained for these patients were reviewed. RESULTS Patients with Crohn's disease (CD) (N = 21) and ulcerative colitis (UC) (N = 14) underwent laparoscopic surgery. In the CD group, the mean age was 37.4 years. Two patients (9.5%) required conversion to an open procedure. The median length of postoperative hospitalization was 9 (7-40) days. Overall morbidity was 26.3% and no patients required re-operation. In the UC group, the mean age was 55.2 years. The conversion rate was 14.3% (2/14). The median time to regular diet was 4 (3-10) days and the median length of postoperative hospitalization was 8 (7-25) days. Four patients developed postoperative complications and one patient developed ileostomy retraction requiring urgent operative intervention to rebuild the stoma. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic surgery in patients with IBD can be accomplished safely and with reasonable operative times, conversion rates and morbidity rates. The main advantages of the laparoscopic approach are rapid recovery, improved cosmesis, less postoperative pain, and patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Han
- Department of general surgery, RuiJin hospital affiliated Shanghai Jiaotong University school of medicine, Shanghai, China
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jan S, Slap G, Dai D, Rubin DM. Variation in surgical outcomes for adolescents and young adults with inflammatory bowel disease. Pediatrics 2013; 131 Suppl 1:S81-9. [PMID: 23457154 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-1427j] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine whether hospital type (children's hospital or generalist hospital) and surgeon specialty are associated with variations in surgical outcomes for hospitalized adolescents and young adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) requiring surgery. METHODS The 2007-2009 Perspective Data Warehouse was used to identify a retrospective cohort study of all inpatients 16 to 25 years old who received surgery for IBD. Multivariate regression, clustered at the hospital level, examined the association of hospital type and surgical specialty with surgical complications and 30-day readmissions. RESULTS Surgery was performed in 917 hospitalizations of 598 patients across 20 children's hospitals and 198 general hospitals by 566 general surgeons, 46 pediatric surgeons, and 305 colorectal surgeons. After adjustment, children's hospitals had higher predicted probabilities of surgical complication (predicted probability [PP]: 35% [95% confidence interval (CI): 28-42]) compared with general hospitals (PP: 26% [95% CI: 23-29]). Despite higher complications among children's hospitals, pediatric surgeons had lowest predicated probabilities of surgical complication or 30-day readmission (PP: 24% [95% CI: 10-39]) compared with general surgeons (PP: 39% [95% CI: 35-43]) and colorectal surgeons (PP: 35% [95% CI: 28-42]). CONCLUSIONS Disparate outcomes for adolescents and young adults receiving care in children's versus generalist hospitals and from different types of surgeons reveal the need to better understand how practice setting and surgical specialty may modify outcomes for a population that traverses a variety of health care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Jan
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Laparoscopic surgery compared with open surgery decreases surgical site infection in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2013; 256:934-45. [PMID: 23108128 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0b013e318269a46b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare surgical site infections rate in obese patients after laparoscopic surgery with open general abdominal surgery. BACKGROUND In mixed surgical populations, surgical site infections are fewer in laparoscopic surgery than in open surgery. It is not clear if this is also the case for obese patients, who have a higher risk of surgical site infections than nonobese patients. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, and The Cochrane library (CENTRAL) were searched systematically for studies on laparoscopic surgery compared with open abdominal surgery. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting surgical site infection in groups of obese patients (body mass index ≥ 30) were included. Separate meta-analyses with a fixed effects model for RCTs and a random effects model for observational studies were performed. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed according to the Cochrane method and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS Eight RCTs and 36 observational studies on bariatric and nonbariatric surgery were identified. Meta-analyses of RCTs and observational studies showed a significantly lower surgical site infection rate after laparoscopic surgery (OR = 0.19; 95% CI [0.08-0.45]; P = 0.0002 and OR = 0.33; 95% CI [0.26-0.42]; P = 0.00001). Sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of selection and detection bias confirmed the significant estimates with acceptable heterogeneity. No publication bias was present for the observational studies. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic surgery in obese patients reduces surgical site infection rate by 70%-80% compared with open surgery across general abdominal surgical procedures. Future efforts should be focused on further development of laparoscopic surgery for the growing obese population.
Collapse
|
40
|
Zoccali M, Fichera A. Minimally invasive approaches for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18:6756-63. [PMID: 23239913 PMCID: PMC3520164 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i46.6756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2012] [Revised: 07/13/2012] [Accepted: 08/04/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite significant improvements in medical management of inflammatory bowel disease, many of these patients still require surgery at some point in the course of their disease. Their young age and poor general conditions, worsened by the aggressive medical treatments, make minimally invasive approaches particularly enticing to this patient population. However, the typical inflammatory changes that characterize these diseases have hindered wide diffusion of laparoscopy in this setting, currently mostly pursued in high-volume referral centers, despite accumulating evidences in the literature supporting the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. The largest body of evidence currently available for terminal ileal Crohn’s disease shows improved short term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery, with prolonged operative times. For Crohn’s colitis, high quality evidence supporting laparoscopic surgery is lacking. Encouraging preliminary results have been obtained with the adoption of laparoscopic restorative total proctocolectomy for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. A consensus about patients’ selection and the need for staging has not been reached yet. Despite the lack of conclusive evidence, a wave of enthusiasm is pushing towards less invasive strategies, to further minimize surgical trauma, with single incision laparoscopic surgery being the most realistic future development.
Collapse
|
41
|
Huang R, Koleilat I, Lee EC. Single surgeon experience with laparoscopic surgery in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012; 23:61-4. [PMID: 23072408 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2012.0062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Laparoscopic management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been well established in adults. Its efficacy and safety are less defined in pediatrics. We reviewed our single surgeon laparoscopic experience with pediatric IBD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS All consecutive patients 17 years old or younger with IBD who underwent initial laparoscopic surgery for management of disease from May 2002 to May 2011 were identified. Patients were analyzed retrospectively with respect to age, gender, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, history of prior abdominal surgery, operative time, need for conversion to open procedure, estimated blood loss, need for blood transfusion, length of hospitalization, need for intensive care unit monitoring, and patient outcomes within 30 days. RESULTS In total, 44 pediatric patients underwent 52 laparoscopic surgeries. Forty-two patient cases (80.8%) had had no prior abdominal surgery. Mean operative time was 132 minutes. Two patients (3.8%) underwent conversion from a laparoscopic to open approach. Mean estimated blood loss was 64 mL. The average hospitalization was 5.5 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 10 patients (19.2%): 2 were treated for wound infection or abscess, 7 required re-admission, and 1 required return to the operating room for exploratory laparotomy. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic management of IBD has not routinely been implemented in the pediatric population. We demonstrate acceptable perioperative morbidity and rate of conversion to open with an overall successful laparoscopic approach in pediatric patients. This may have particular long-term benefits in a population faced with longer life expectancy. An initial laparoscopic approach is a feasible and safe option for pediatric IBD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renee Huang
- Department of Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York 12208, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Millán Scheiding M, Rodriguez Moranta F, Kreisler Moreno E, Golda T, Fraccalvieri D, Biondo S. [Current status of elective surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. A systematic review]. Cir Esp 2012; 90:548-57. [PMID: 23063060 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2012.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2012] [Accepted: 07/29/2012] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Despite recent advances in the medical treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), approximately 25-40% of patients will need surgery during their disease. The aim of elective surgical treatment of UC is to remove the colon/and rectum with minimal postoperative morbidity, and to offer a good long-term quality of life. There are several technical options for the surgical treatment of UC; at present, the most frequently offered is restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Both the surgeon and patient should be aware of the risks associated with a technically demanding procedure and possible postoperative complications, including the possibility of infertility, permanent stoma, or several surgical procedures for pouch-related complications. A precise knowledge of each surgical technique, and its indications, complications, long-term risks and benefits is useful to offer the best surgical option tailored to each patient. We searched in PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE for all kinds of articles (all the publications until April 2012). Papers on Crohn's disease, indeterminate colitis, or other forms of colitis were excluded from the review. We reviewed the abstracts and identified potentially relevant articles. MeSH words were used as search, "ulcerative colitis", "surgery", "indications", "elective surgery", "colectomy," "proctocolectomy," "laparoscopy", "Complications," "outcome", "results" "quality of life". One hundred and four articles were included in this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Millán Scheiding
- Unidad de Cirugía Colorrectal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, ĹHospitalet de LLobregat, Barcelona, España.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, Fearon KCH, Norderval S, Lobo DN, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Ramirez J. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 2012; 31:801-16. [PMID: 23062720 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 271] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2012] [Accepted: 08/19/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This review aims to present a consensus for optimal perioperative care in rectal/pelvic surgery, and to provide graded recommendations for items for an evidenced-based enhanced recovery protocol. METHODS Studies were selected with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials and large prospective cohorts. For each item of the perioperative treatment pathway, available English-language literature was examined, reviewed and graded. A consensus recommendation was reached after critical appraisal of the literature by the group. RESULTS For most of the protocol items, recommendations are based on good-quality trials or meta-analyses of good-quality trials (evidence grade: high or moderate). CONCLUSIONS Based on the evidence available for each item of the multimodal perioperative care pathway, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) and International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN) present a comprehensive evidence-based consensus review of perioperative care for rectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Nygren
- Department of Surgery, Ersta Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Turner D, Levine A, Escher JC, Griffiths AM, Russell RK, Dignass A, Dias JA, Bronsky J, Braegger CP, Cucchiara S, de Ridder L, Fagerberg UL, Hussey S, Hugot JP, Kolacek S, Kolho KL, Lionetti P, Paerregaard A, Potapov A, Rintala R, Serban DE, Staiano A, Sweeny B, Veerman G, Veres G, Wilson DC, Ruemmele FM. Management of pediatric ulcerative colitis: joint ECCO and ESPGHAN evidence-based consensus guidelines. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2012; 55:340-361. [PMID: 22773060 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0b013e3182662233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 300] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Pediatric ulcerative colitis (UC) shares many features with adult-onset disease but there are some unique considerations; therefore, therapeutic approaches have to be adapted to these particular needs. We aimed to formulate guidelines for managing UC in children based on a systematic review (SR) of the literature and a robust consensus process. The present article is a product of a joint effort of the European Crohn's and Colitis Organization (ECCO) and the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). METHODS A group of 27 experts in pediatric IBD participated in an iterative consensus process including 2 face-to-face meetings, following an open call to ESPGHAN and ECCO members. A list of 23 predefined questions were addressed by working subgroups based on a SR of the literature. RESULTS A total of 40 formal recommendations and 68 practice points were endorsed with a consensus rate of at least 89% regarding initial evaluation, how to monitor disease activity, the role of endoscopic evaluation, medical and surgical therapy, timing and choice of each medication, the role of combined therapy, and when to stop medications. A management flowchart, based on the Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI), is presented. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines provide clinically useful points to guide the management of UC in children. Taken together, the recommendations offer a standardized protocol that allows effective, timely management and monitoring of the disease course, while acknowledging that each patient is unique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Turner
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Nasseri Y, Wexner SD. Laparoscopic or Open Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2012. [DOI: 10.1053/j.scrs.2012.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
46
|
Dayan B, Turner D. Role of surgery in severe ulcerative colitis in the era of medical rescue therapy. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18:3833-8. [PMID: 22876035 PMCID: PMC3413055 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i29.3833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2012] [Revised: 03/29/2012] [Accepted: 04/20/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the growing use of medical salvage therapy, colectomy has remained a cornerstone in managing acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASC) both in children and in adults. Colectomy should be regarded as a life saving procedure in ASC, and must be seriously considered in any steroid-refractory patient. However, colectomy is not a cure for the disease but rather the substitution of a large problem with smaller problems, including fecal incontinence, pouchitis, irritable pouch syndrome, cuffitis, anastomotic ulcer and stenosis, missed or de-novo Crohn’s disease and, in young females, reduced fecundity. This notion has led to the widespread practice of offering medical salvage therapy before colectomy in most patients without surgical abdomen or toxic megacolon. Medical salvage therapies which have proved effective in the clinical trial setting include cyclosporine, tacrolimus and infliximab, which seem equally effective in the short term. Validated predictive rules can identify a subset of patients who will eventually fail corticosteroid therapy after only 3-5 d of steroid therapy with an accuracy of 85%-95%. This accuracy is sufficiently high for initiating medical therapy, but usually not colectomy, early in the admission without delaying colectomy if required. This approach has reduced the colectomy rate in ASC from 30%-70% in the past to 10%-20% nowadays, and the mortality rate from over 70% in the 1930s to about 1%. In general, restorative proctocolectomy (ileoanal pouch or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis), especially the J-pouch, is preferred over straight pull-through (ileo-anal) or ileo-rectal anastomosis, which may still be considered in young females concerned about infertility. Colectomy in the acute severe colitis setting, is usually performed in three steps due to the severity of the inflammation, concurrent steroid treatment and the generally reduced clinical condition. The first surgical step involves colectomy and constructing an ileal stoma, the second - constructing the pouch and the third - closing the stoma. This review focuses on the role of surgical treatment in ulcerative colitis in the era of medical rescue therapy.
Collapse
|
47
|
Benefits of a straight laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a retrospective case-matched study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012; 22:118-21. [PMID: 22487623 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0b013e3182447a88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSES The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of straight laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy (sLRP) with ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS Twenty patients underwent sLRP or open restorative proctocolectomy. The 2 groups were retrospectively well matched with respect to sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists' score. RESULTS The median operative time was longer in the sLRP group (P=0.0003). The median operative blood loss was significantly less in the sLRP group (P=0.0054). The median analgesic drug usage during the first 7 days after surgery was lower in the sLRP group (P=0.038). There were no differences in morbidity rates and long-term functional outcome measures between the groups. CONCLUSIONS An sLRP for UC has the advantage over an open restorative proctocolectomy of better short-term outcomes, and both groups have similar long-term outcomes. This procedure is acceptable for minimally invasive surgery in patients with UC.
Collapse
|
48
|
Biondi A, Zoccali M, Costa S, Troci A, Contessini-Avesani E, Fichera A. Surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis in the biologic therapy era. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18:1861-70. [PMID: 22563165 PMCID: PMC3337560 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i16.1861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2011] [Revised: 11/25/2011] [Accepted: 03/10/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Recently introduced in the treatment algorithms and guidelines for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, biological therapy is an effective treatment option for patients with an acute severe flare not responsive to conventional treatments and for patients with steroid dependent disease. The reduction in hospitalization and surgical intervention for patients affected by ulcerative colitis after the introduction of biologic treatment remains to be proven. Furthermore, these agents seem to be associated with increase in cost of treatment and risk for serious postoperative complications. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the surgical treatment of choice in ulcerative colitis patients. Surgery is traditionally recommended as salvage therapy when medical management fails, and, despite advances in medical therapy, colectomy rates remain unchanged between 20% and 30%. To overcome the reported increase in postoperative complications in patients on biologic therapies, several surgical strategies have been developed to maintain long-term pouch failure rate around 10%, as previously reported. Surgical staging along with the development of minimally invasive surgery are among the most promising advances in this field.
Collapse
|
49
|
Bona S, Molteni M, Montorsi M. Minilaparoscopic colorectal resections: technical note. Minim Invasive Surg 2012; 2012:482079. [PMID: 22548166 PMCID: PMC3323854 DOI: 10.1155/2012/482079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2012] [Accepted: 01/23/2012] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic colorectal resections have been shown to provide short-term advantages in terms of postoperative pain, general morbidity, recovery, and quality of life. To date, long-term results have been proved to be comparable to open surgery irrefutably only for colon cancer. Recently, new trends keep arising in the direction of minimal invasiveness to reduce surgical trauma after colorectal surgery in order to improve morbidity and cosmetic results. The few reports available in the literature on single-port technique show promising results. Natural orifices endoscopic techniques still have very limited application. We focused our efforts in standardising a minilaparoscopic technique (using 3 to 5 mm instruments) for colorectal resections since it can provide excellent cosmetic results without changing the laparoscopic approach significantly. Thus, there is no need for a new learning curve as minilaparoscopy maintains the principle of instrument triangulation. This determines an undoubted advantage in terms of feasibility and reproducibility of the procedure without increasing operative time. Some preliminary experiences confirm that minilaparoscopic colorectal surgery provides acceptable results, comparable to those reported for laparoscopic surgery with regard to operative time, morbidity, and hospital stay. Randomized controlled studies should be conducted to confirm these early encouraging results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Bona
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, University of Milan School of Medicine, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milano, Italy
| | - M. Molteni
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, University of Milan School of Medicine, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milano, Italy
| | - M. Montorsi
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, University of Milan School of Medicine, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
McLemore EC, Cullen J, Horgan S, Talamini MA, Ramamoorthy S. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic stage II restorative proctectomy for toxic ulcerative colitis. Int J Med Robot 2011; 8:178-83. [PMID: 22113993 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/16/2011] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a paucity of literature reporting minimally invasive proctectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC). We report a novel application of a robotic system to perform restorative proctectomy in patients with toxic UC. METHODS Retrospective review, case series report. RESULTS Robotic-assisted laparoscopic proctectomy with ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis was performed in three patients with toxic UC. All patients previously underwent urgent laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy. One female and two male patients were aged 39, 24 and 43, respectively. The procedures were performed safely with minimal complications. The robotic proctectomy operative time was reduced from 134 to 106 min. None of the patients have experienced fecal incontinence, nocturnal seepage or sexual dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS This is a case series report of a robotic-assisted laparoscopic proctectomy with restorative ileal J-pouch in patients with toxic UC. This technique has been previously described for use in patients with medically refractory UC and neoplasia associated with chronic UC. This series exemplifies an ideal application of a robotic system with improved visibility, rotation and ergonomics.
Collapse
|