The International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD) guidelines represent a rich repository that serves as the only comprehensive set of clinical recommendations for children, adolescents, and young adults living with diabetes worldwide. This chapter builds on the 2022 ISPAD guidelines, and summarizes recent advances in the technology behind glucose monitoring, and its role in glucose-responsive integrated technology that is feasible with the use of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in children and adolescents. The International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD) guidelines represent a rich repository that serves as the only comprehensive set of clinical recommendations for children, adolescents, and young adults living with diabetes worldwide. This chapter builds on the 2022 ISPAD guidelines, and summarizes recent advances in the technology behind glucose monitoring, and its role in glucose-responsive integrated technology that is feasible with the use of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems in children and adolescents.

The UK national pediatric diabetes audit reports higher HbA1c for children and young people (CYP) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) of Black ethnicity compared with White counterparts. This is presumably related to higher mean blood glucose (MBG) due to lower socioeconomic status (SES) and less access to technology. We aimed to determine if HbA1c ethnic disparity persists after accounting for the above variables.

A retrospective analysis of participants who received structured education in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use was conducted at a tertiary center. HbA1c was paired with glucose metrics from 90-day CGM data. The influence of ethnicity, SES determined by Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), MBG and other covariates on HbA1c was evaluated using multiple variable regression analysis. Occurrence of hypoglycemia was evaluated.

A total of 168 (79 White, 61 South Asian, 28 Black) CYP with T1D were included. There were no differences between groups for age, MBG, time in range (3.9-10.0 mmol/L), diabetes duration, gender, insulin delivery method (multiple daily injections vs continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion), or percent sensor use (PSU). In multiple variable analysis, MBG (p<0.0001), ethnicity (p<0.0001), age (p<0.001), duration of diabetes (p<0.01) and PSU (p<0.05) accounted for 81% of the variability in HbA1c. Adjusted HbA1c in the Black group (67 mmol/mol) was higher than both South Asian (63 mmol/mol) and White groups (62 mmol/mol) (p<0.001). Despite significant IMD differences between groups, it did not influence HbA1c. Multiple variable analysis showed that the Black group experienced more hypoglycemia than South Asian and White groups (<3.9 and <3.0 mmol/L, p<0.05).

CYP from Black ethnic backgrounds have a higher HbA1c compared with their South Asian and White counterparts which is clinically significant and independent of MBG, potentially contributing to increased complications risk. Additionally, the Black group experienced a higher incidence of hypoglycemia, possibly due to a treat-to-HbA1c target approach.

The UK National Paediatric Diabetes Audit (NPDA) data reports disparities in Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels among children and young people (CYP) with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D), with higher levels in those of Black ethnic background and lower socioeconomic status who have less access to technology. We investigate HbA1c differences in a T1D cohort with higher than national average technology uptake where > 60% come from an ethnic minority and/or socioeconomically deprived population.

Retrospective cross-sectional study investigating the influence of demographic factors, technology use, and socioeconomic status (SES) on glycaemic outcomes. The study population was 222 CYP with T1D who attended the diabetes clinic in 2022 at a single tertiary paediatric diabetes centre.

Among 222 CYP, 60% were of ethnic minority (Asian, Black, Mixed and Other were 32%, 12%, 6% and 10% respectively) and 40% of white heritage. 94% used Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) and 60% used Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) via open or closed loop. 6% used Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) and Multiple Daily Injections (MDI), 34% used CGM and MDI, 38% used CGM and CSII and 22% used Hybrid Closed-Loop (HCL) systems. Significant differences in HbA1c across therapy groups (p < 0.001) was noted with lowest HbA1c in HCL group (55 mmol/mol; p <0.001). Despite adjusting for therapy type, the Black group had higher HbA1c than their white and Asian counterparts (p<0.001). CYP from the most deprived tertile had significantly higher HbA1c levels (p < 0.001) but the difference was not sustained after adjusting for therapy type.

Advanced diabetes technologies improve glycaemic control. Whilst equalising technology access mitigates socioeconomic disparities in HbA1c, CYP from Black ethnic background continue to display a higher HbA1c. The study underscores the necessity of fair technology distribution and further research into elevated HbA1c levels among Black CYP using advanced diabetes technology.

Manufacturer-supported didactic teaching programmes offer effective automated insulin delivery (AID) systems onboarding in children and young people (CYP) with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, this approach has limited flexibility to accommodate the needs of families requiring additional support.

Evaluate the efficacy of an inperson manufacturer-supported didactic teaching programme (Group A), in comparison to a flexible flipped learning approach delivered virtually or inperson (Group B). Retrospective analysis of CYP with T1D using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), who were initiated on AID systems between 2021 and 2023. Compare CGM metrics from baseline to 90 days for both groups A and B. Additionally, compare the two groups for change in CGM metrics over the 90-day period (∆), patient demographics and onboarding time.

Group A consisted of 74 CYP (53% male) with median age of 13.9 years and Group B 91 CYP (54% male) with median age of 12.7 years. From baseline to 90 days, Group A lowered mean (±SD) time above range (TAR, >10.0 mmol/L) from 47.6% (±15.0) to 33.2% (±15.0) (p<0.001), increased time in range (TIR, 3.9-10.0 mmol/L) from 50.4% (±14.0) to 64.7% (±10.2) (p<0.001). From baseline to 90 days, Group B lowered TAR from 51.3% (±15.1) to 34.5% (±11.3) (p<0.001) and increased TIR from 46.5% (±14.5) to 63.7% (±11.0) (p<0.001). There was no difference from baseline to 90 days for time below range (TBR, <3.9 mmol/L) for Group A and Group B. ∆ TAR, TIR and TBR for both groups were comparable. Group B consisted of CYP with higher socioeconomic deprivation, greater ethnic diversity and lower carer education achievement (p<0.05). The majority of Group B (n=79, 87%) chose virtual flipped learning, halving diabetes educator time and increasing onboarding cadence by fivefold.

A flexible virtual flipped learning programme increases onboarding cadence and capacity to offer equitable AID system onboarding.

Community sport coaches in Western Australia lack an understanding, the confidence, and knowledge in supporting young people with Type 1 diabetes (T1D). This study aims to identify what T1D educational resources are required to upskill coaches in Western Australia.

Semi-structured online interviews were conducted with i) young people living with T1D, ii) parents of young people living with T1D and iii) community sport coaches. The questions explored i) past experiences of T1D management in community sport ii) the T1D information coaches should be expected to know about and iii) the format of resources to be developed. Thematic analysis of interview transcripts was performed, and the themes identified were used to guide resource development.

Thirty-two participants (16 young people living with T1D, 8 parents, 8 coaches) were interviewed. From the interviews, young people wanted coaches to have a better understanding of what T1D is and the effect it has on their sporting performance, parents wanted a resource that explains T1D to coaches, and sports coaches wanted to know the actions to best support a player living with T1D. All groups identified that signs and symptoms of hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia needed to be a key component of the resource. Sports coaches wanted a resource that is simple, quick to read and available in a variety of different formats.

The interviews resulted in valuable information gained from all groups and have reinforced the need for the development of specific resources to increase community knowledge and provide support for players with T1D, parents and sport coaches.

Physical activity (PA) plays an important role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), particularly in individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) who are at increased risk. Our aim was to determine levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), sedentary behaviour and sleep in adolescents with T1DM, and identify barriers to PA.

Participants aged 12-18 with T1DM wore an accelerometer and continuous glucose monitor for 24 h over 7-days. Data was processed into PA metrics and sleep. Pearson correlations were used to test associations between MVPA and metabolic measures. Barriers to PA were measured using a questionnaire.

Thirty-seven adolescents provided valid accelerometer data. Mean daily MVPA was 44.0 min [SD 17.6] with 16.2% achieving the guideline of ≥ 60 min/day. Participants had 11 h [SD 1.2] of sedentary behaviour and 7.6 h [SD 1.5] of sleep/day. There was no difference in MVPA in overweight or obese (53.8%) vs. healthy weight (44.2%) adolescents (45.0 min [SD 16.6] vs. 43.1 min [SD 18.8]). Only 39.6% reported one or more diabetes specific barrier to PA.

Adolescents with T1DM engage in insufficient MVPA and sleep, irrespective of body weight status, suggesting the need for targeted interventions.

Investigate the effect of using short bursts of moderate-intensity activity between meals to lower hyperglycaemia on glucose metrics. Design and Methods. Children and young people with type 1 diabetes (CYPD) attending continuous glucose monitoring education were taught to use moderate-intensity activity to lower high glucose levels (to <10.0 mmol/L using 10-15 minlowers ∼2.0 mmol/L) between meals. Retrospective cross-sectional data analysis of CYPD at a single tertiary centre between 2019 and 2022. Data were collected on demographics and glucose metrics (HbA1c, time in range (TIR, 3.9-10.0 mmol/L), time above range (TAR, >10.0 mmol/L), time below range (TBR, <3.9 mmol/L)). Minutes of activity usually performed to lower a glucose level of 14.0 mmol/L trending steady at 6 months grouped the CYPD into low (<5 min), mild (5-10 min), or moderate (11-20 min) activity groups.

125 (n = 53, 40% male) CYPD with a mean (standard deviations) age of 12.3 (±3.7) years and diabetes duration of 7.0 ± 3.7 years were included. HbA1c improved from 58.5 (±8.6) mmol/mol at baseline to 54.9 (±7.2) mmol/mol at 6 months (p < 0.001). Low, mild, and moderate activity was reported by 30% (n = 37), 34% (n = 43), and 36% (n = 45), respectively. At 6 months, HbA1c (52.0 vs. 54.3 vs. 59.4 mmol/mol, p < 0.001), TIR (68.0% vs. 59.71 vs. 51.1%, p < 0.001) and TAR (29.9% vs. 38.3% vs. 45.3%, p < 0.001) were significantly different across the moderate, mild, and low activity groups, respectively. No association was found for TBR (2.16% vs. 2.32% vs. 2.58%, p = 0.408) across groups.

Increasing the use of moderate-intensity activity to lower hyperglycaemia between meals is associated with improved glucose control without increasing hypoglycaemia for CYPD.

The aim of this systematic review was to report the evidence on optimal prandial timing of insulin bolus in youths with type 1 diabetes. A systematic search was performed including studies published in the last 20 years (2002-2022). A PICOS framework was used in the selection process and evidence was assessed using the GRADE system. Up to one third of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes injected rapid-acting insulin analogues after a meal. Moderate-high level quality studies showed that a pre-meal bolus compared with a bolus given at the start or after the meal was associated with a lower peak blood glucose after one to two hours, particularly after breakfast, as well as with reduced HbA1c, without any difference in the frequency of hypoglycemia. There were no differences related to the timing of bolus in total daily insulin and BMI, although these results were based on a single study. Data on individuals' treatment satisfaction were limited but did not show any effect of timing of bolus on quality of life. In addition, post-prandial administration of fast-acting analogues was superior to rapid-acting analogues on post-prandial glycemia. There was no evidence for any difference in outcomes related to the timing of insulin bolus across age groups in the two studies. In conclusion, prandial insulin injected before a meal, particularly at breakfast, provides better post-prandial glycemia and HbA1c without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia, and without affecting total daily insulin dose and BMI. For young children who often have variable eating behaviors, fast-acting analogues administered at mealtime or post-meal could provide an additional advantage.