We provide a review on the incidence, consequences, and management of obesity in patients before and after pancreas transplant.

Obesity is common in patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Obesity at the time of pancreas transplant is associated with worse graft and patient survival, while weight gain after transplant is associated with insulin resistance and posttransplant diabetes. Currently, lifestyle interventions are the backbone of obesity management and can improve insulin sensitivity, but result in only modest weight loss. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) offers the potential for substantial and durable weight loss. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is the procedure of choice and can be performed safely both before and after pancreas transplant. Antiobesity medications (AOMs) may also be effective, but concerns remain regarding determine the safety and efficacy when used in pancreas transplant recipients. More evidence is needed to guide the use of AOMs and MBS in pancreas transplant recipients.

Lifestyle interventions, MBS, and AOMs each have a role in managing obesity after pancreas transplantation. In light of limited evidence and unique challenges in pancreas transplant patients, obesity management in pancreas transplant patients requires an individualized approach that leverages multidisciplinary expertise.

As the prevalence of obesity has reached epidemic proportions, its prevalence has also increased among adults living with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Unlike the pathophysiologic relationship between obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus, the relationship between obesity and type 1 diabetes mellitus, and management of obesity in the setting of type 1 diabetes mellitus, have not been well reviewed. In this article, we discuss the comprehensive management of obesity in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus, focusing on medical nutrition therapy and adjunct therapies such as weight loss-promoting medications and metabolic/bariatric surgery.

The last two decades have provided far more options f both patients and their physicians in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. While dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have been approved for nearly two decades, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2is) are relatively new. Of interest to perioperative physicians, these drugs present specific perioperative concerns, prompting many societies to issue guidelines. Retained gastric contents due to slow gastric emptying is a significant drawback of GLP-1RAs, increasing the risk of aspiration. Recommendations include withholding GLP-1RAs for a predefined period of time, performing gastric ultrasound to evaluate gastric contents, modifying anesthesia management, particularly with regard to the airway, or canceling the scheduled (elective) surgery or procedure. SGLT-2is are known to increase the risk of euglycemic ketoacidosis. The benefits of both GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2is extend beyond the treatment of diabetes. As a result, perioperative physicians may encounter their use outside of their traditional indications. SGLT-2is are being used extensively to treat heart failure and obesity, for example. There have been other developments as well. For instance, Imeglimin, a variant of metformin available in Japan and India, Icodec, a once-weekly basal insulin formulation, and IcoSema, a once-weekly combination of Icodec plus semaglutide, are all being explored, although in their early stages or facing approval challenges.

Background/Objectives: People with type 1 diabetes have an unmet need for cardiovascular protection due to the lack of new recommended antidiabetic therapies with cardiovascular benefits. We examined whether the addition of an empagliflozin/metformin combination, and each drug alone, can complement insulin to improve glucometabolic parameters in overweight people with type 1 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk. Methods: This pilot, single-center double-blind randomized controlled trial included 40 people with type 1 diabetes. In addition to insulin, they received empagliflozin (25 mg daily), metformin (2000 mg daily), an empagliflozin/metformin combination, or a placebo. The intervention period was 12 weeks. Glycemic parameters, insulin requirements, and blood and urine samples were analyzed. Indices for liver fibrosis were calculated. Due to potential safety concerns, participants regularly measured blood ketone values. Results: The empagliflozin/metformin combination decreased HbA1c (-0.6%, p < 0.05) and weight (-6.1 kg, p < 0.05). Empagliflozin decreased the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (-31.4 ± 4.9%, p = 0.002). The empagliflozin/metformin combination and empagliflozin decreased the estimated daily proteinuria (-34.6 ± 5.0%, p = 0.006 and -35.9 ± 6.2%, p = 0.03, respectively), the calculated FIB-4 (up to -17.8 ± 5.2%, p = 0.04 and -10.7 ± 3.7%, p = 0.02, respectively), and other liver fibrosis indices and uric acid values. No significant side effects occurred during the study. Conclusions: The empagliflozin/metformin combination improved glycemic control, reduced weight and insulin requirements, and produced several additional beneficial metabolic effects in overweight people with type 1 diabetes with increased cardiovascular risk.

Adiposity, synonymous with obesity, is prevalent among both children and adults with type 1 diabetes in China. Recent literature underscored the patho-physiological and socioeconomic factors associated with adiposity, and consistently highlighted its impact on cardiovascular, kidney, and metabolic diseases among Chinese individuals with type 1 diabetes. Addressing and managing adiposity in individuals with type 1 diabetes are complicated and entail comprehensive approaches including lifestyle modifications, cognitive-behavioral therapy, insulin dose titration, and other diabetes treatment medications. The condition calls for coordination among policymakers, researchers, clinicians, and patients.

This systematic review aimed to summarize the existing evidence from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the impact of sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) inhibitors on albuminuria levels and renal function in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D).

The literature search was performed through Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane Library, and Scopus until November 11, 2023. Double-independent study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed. Evidence was pooled with three-level mixed-effects meta-analysis.

In total, 5221 participants with T1D among 11 RCTs were analyzed. All RCTs had low risk of bias according to the Cochrane Collaboration tool (RoB 2). SGLT inhibitors were associated with a significantly greater reduction in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) compared to controls (MD = - 23.13%; 95% CI = [- 33.69, - 12.57]; P < 0.001; level of evidence high). On the basis of subgroup analysis, this effect was consistent across all available SGLT inhibitors, irrespective of the dosage. Finally, a neutral class effect was observed on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, MD = - 1.03 mL/min/1.73 m2; 95% CI = [- 2.26, 0.19]; P = 0.1; level of evidence moderate). Only empagliflozin was associated with a significant reduction in eGFR compared to placebo (MD = - 2.23 mL/min/1.73 m2; 95% CI = [- 3.62, - 0.84]; P = 0.002).

Our findings suggest that adjunctive therapy with SGLT inhibitors results in a significant reduction in albuminuria, while their use is associated with a neutral effect on creatinine clearance, as a measure of renal function. Future renal outcome trials are needed to assess SGLT inhibitors' role in the pharmacological armamentarium against diabetic nephropathy in T1D.