BackgroundChronic limb-threatening ischemia is the end stage of peripheral arterial disease. The revascularization of patients suffering from diabetes mellitus who present chronic total occlusions of below-the-knee vessels can be technically very difficult and sometimes impossible to achieve by performing only an antegrade approach. As regards retrograde recanalization, several studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of this technique in the femoropopliteal axis or in the infrageniculate arterial vessels in patients with advanced atherosclerotic disease. Currently in the literature there are still few studies analyzing the effectiveness of the retrograde approach in the treatment of occlusions of below-the-knee vessels in patients suffering from diabetes mellitus.ObjectivesThe purpose of the study was to retrospectively evaluate safety, technical success, and clinical outcome of retrograde transpedal/transtibial recanalization in patients suffering from diabetes mellitus.Research designThis is a retrospective observational monocentric study.SubjectsWe retrospectively analyzed data over a three-year period (August 2019-September 2022) of patients that underwent revascularization of one or more below-the-knee vessels for chronic limb-threatening ischemia and had a retrograde transpedal/transtibial approach after a failed antegrade transfemoral revascularization. We identified and included in the study 28 out of 352 patients.MeasuresWe evaluated clinical comorbidities, Rutherford-Becker classification, Texas classification, and the occluded vessels (only below-the-knee or multi-level occlusions); we then analyzed technical, procedural and clinical success, survival rate, and procedural complications. All patients included in the study underwent a 6 months follow-up.ResultsPatients belonged to Rutherford-Becker stage V (18) or VI (10), Texas wound classification IIC: 7 IID: 8 IIIC: 4 IIID: 9, all suffering from diabetes, and five were on dialysis. Treatment of a femoropopliteal lesion was performed during the same procedure in 6 of 28 patients (28.6%). Technical success was obtained in 25 out of 28 patients (89.3%), and procedural success was achieved in 23 of 28 patients (82.1%). No complications occurred at the pedal/tibial access. One minor complication at the femoral access was observed. The cure rate 6 months after the procedure was 57.1% (16/28 patients), and the 6-month survival rate was 96.4%. Three major amputations (10.7%) and four minor amputations (14.2%) were performed after revascularization procedures. Two patients were readmitted for vascular causes (7.1%).ConclusionsRetrograde approach for revascularization of below-the-knee vessels in diabetic patients is safe and effective with high procedural and clinical success rates in the absence of significant complications. It should be considered when revascularization cannot be achieved with an antegrade transfemoral approach.

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PB-MNCs) therapy is an adjuvant treatment for patients with ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and no-option critical limb ischemia (NO-CLI). This study aimed to evaluate factors influencing the effectiveness of PB-MNC therapy.

This prospective, not controlled study included a cohort of patients with DFUs and NO-CLI treated by PB-MNCs. NO-CLI was defined as the revascularization failure with desert foot (absence of any artery below-the-ankle) or partial desert foot (absence of a wound-related artery with TcPO2 < 30 mmHg) at the final post-procedural angiogram. After one year of follow-up, the rate of major amputation was evaluated such as clinical, wound, and vascular features of amputees in comparison to not amputees. In addition, the factors influencing the risk of major amputation were analyzed.

Sixty-four patients were included. The mean age was 73.8 ± 5.8 years, 75% were male, and all of them had type 2 diabetes. At one year of follow-up, major amputation was documented in 12.5% of patients. Amputees had a higher rate of desert foot (vs. partial desert foot) (100% vs. 25%, p < 0.0001), higher post-procedural pain (5.7 ± 1.9 vs. 2.2 ± 1.3, p < 0.0001), lower TcPO2 after PB-MNCs therapy (30 ± 8 vs. 43 ± 8 mmHg, p = 0.0001), and more cases of heel ulcers (75% vs. 21.4%, p = 0.002). Independent predictors of major amputation resulted the presence of desert foot, persistence of post-procedural pain, heel involvement with multiple ulcers, and inability to stand or walk without assistance.

PB-MNCs therapy resulted less effective in patients with complete desert foot, persistence of paint after therapy, heel involvement in persons with multiple ulcers, and impaired walking.

The current study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PB-MNCs) therapy for patients with ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) treated through indirect revascularization.

The study is a prospective non-controlled observational study including patients with neuro-ischaemic DFUs who received indirect peripheral revascularization and showed a persistence of wound ischaemia defined by the absence of angiographic collateral vessels and TcPO2 values < 30 mmHg in the wound angiosome area. All patients received 3 cycles of PB-MNCs therapy administered along the wound related artery based on the angiosome theory. The primary outcomes measures were healing, major amputation, and survival after 1 year of follow-up. The secondary outcomes measures were the evaluation of tissue perfusion by TcPO2 and foot pain defined by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).

Overall 52 (9.7%) patients were included. Most patients were aged (> 70 years), all of them were affected by Type 2 Diabetes with a long diabetes duration (> 20 years). Almost 80% were assessed as grade 2D- 3D of Texas University Classification. Forty-four patients (84.6%) patients healed and survived, 2 (3.85%) healed and deceased, 2 (3.85%) not healed and deceased, 4 (7.7%) not healed and survived. No major amputations were recorded. A significant increase of TcPO2 after PB-MNCs therapy were recorded in comparison to the baseline (43 ± 9 vs 18 ± 8 mmHg, p < 0.0001), such as a concomitant reduction of foot pain (1.8 ± 1.2 vs 6.2 ± 2.1, p < 0.0001).

PB-MNCs resulted effective to promote wound healing and limb salvage in diabetic patients with ischaemic DFUs who received indirect revascularization.

This study highlights the importance of identifying and addressing risk factors associated with wound complications following transtibial amputation in diabetic patients. These amputations, often necessitated by severe diabetic foot ulcers, carry significant risks of postoperative complications such as infection and delayed wound healing. Elevated hemoglobin A1c levels, indicative of poor glycemic control, and a history of kidney transplantation, due to required immunosuppressive therapy, are key factors influencing these outcomes. This paper emphasizes the need for enhanced glycemic management and personalized postoperative care, particularly for immunocompromised individuals, to minimize complications and improve patient prognosis. Future research should focus on prospective studies to validate targeted interventions and optimize care strategies, ultimately aiming to reduce the healthcare burden associated with diabetic foot complications.

The growing global prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM), along with its associated complications, continues to rise. When clinically detected most DM complications are irreversible. It is therefore crucial to detect and address these complications early and systematically in order to improve patient care and outcomes. The current clinical practice often prioritizes DM complications by addressing one complication while overlooking others that could occur. It is proposed that the commonly targeted cell types including vascular cells, immune cells, glial cells, and fibroblasts that mediate DM complications, might share early responses to diabetes. In addition, the impact of one complication could be influenced by other complications. Recognizing and focusing on the shared early responses among DM complications, and the impacted cellular constituents, will allow to simultaneously address all DM-related complications and limit adverse treatment impacts. This review explores the current understanding of shared pathological signaling mechanisms among DM complications and recognizes new concepts that will benefit from further investigation in both basic and clinical settings. The ultimate goal is to develop more comprehensive treatment strategies, which effectively impact DM complications in multiple organs and improve patient care and outcomes.

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO), comparing subjects with and without peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The study is a prospective study including a population of patients affected by a DFO located in the forefoot. All patients were managed by a surgical conservative approach defined by the removal of the infected bone, in association with the antibiotic therapy. Patients were divided into two groups: those with PAD (neuro-ischaemic DFO) and those without (neuropathic DFO). After 1 year of follow-up, the following outcome were evaluated and compared between groups: healing, healing time, minor amputation, major amputation, hospitalization, need for surgical re-intervention. Overall, 166 patients were included, 87(52.4%) of them had neuro-ischaemic DFO and 79 (47.6%) neuropathic DFO. Patients with neuro-ischaemic DFO in comparison to neuropathic DFO were older (72.5 ± 9 vs 64.1 ± 15.5 years, P < .0001), had longer diabetes duration (21.8 ± 5.6 vs 16.4 ± 7.6 years, P < .0001), higher rate of dialysis (13.8 vs 1.3%, P = .001) and ischaemic heart disease (79.3 vs 12.7%, P < .0001). Outcomes for neuro-ischaemic DFO and neuropathic DFO were: healing (96.5 vs 97.5%, P = .7), healing time (7.8 ± 6.2 vs 5.7 ± 3.7 weeks, P = .01), minor amputation (16.1 vs 3.8%, P = .006), major amputation (0 vs 0%, ns), hospitalization (90.8 vs 51.9%, P < .0001), surgical re-intervention (14.9 vs 8.8%, P = .004) respectively. In addition, PAD resulted in an independent predictor of minor amputation, hospitalization, and surgical re-intervention. DFO in patients with PAD was characterized by longer healing time, more cases of minor amputation, hospitalization, and surgical re-intervention. PAD independently predicted the risk of minor amputation, hospitalization, and surgical re-intervention, while it was not associated with the healing rate.

Diabetic foot syndrome is a global challenge best managed through multidisciplinary collaboration. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a systematic multidisciplinary team (MDT) on the overall survival and major amputation-free survival of hospitalized patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI).

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at Tampere University Hospital. Cohorts of hospitalized patients with DFI before and after the initiation of multidisciplinary wound ward were compared after an 8-year follow-up.

Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly higher overall survival in the post-MDT cohort (37.8 % vs 22.6 %, p < 0.05) in 8-year follow-up. Similarly, major amputation-free survival was superior in this cohort (31.8 % vs 16.9 %, p < 0.05). Additionally, early major amputation was associated with inferior overall survival (35.1 % vs 12.0 %, p < 0.05). In a multivariable Cox-regression analysis cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 1.38, 95 % confidence interval [CI95%] 1.01-1.87), early amputation (HR 1.64, CI95% 1.14-2.34) and diagnosed peripheral artery disease (HR 2.23, CI95% 1.61-3.09), congestive heart failure (HR 2.13, CI95% 1.47-3.08), or moderate kidney disease (HR 1.95, CI95% 1.34-2.84) were identified as significant risk factors affecting overall survival.

After systematic MDT approach we found improved long-term overall and major amputation-free survival. Multidisciplinary approach is therefore highly recommended for managing patients hospitalized for DFI.

The treatment of patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is extremely complex, requiring a comprehensive approach that involves a variety of different healthcare professionals. Several studies have shown that a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach is useful to achieve good clinical outcomes, reducing major and minor amputation and increasing the chance of healing. Despite this, the multidisciplinary approach is not always a recognized treatment strategy. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effects of an MDT approach on major adverse limb events, healing, time-to-heal, all-cause mortality, and other clinical outcomes in patients with active DFUs. The present meta-analysis was performed for the purpose of developing Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot with the support of the Italian Society of Diabetology (Società Italiana di Diabetologia, SID) and the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists (Associazione Medici Diabetologi, AMD). The study was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. All randomized clinical trials and observational studies, with a duration of at least 26 weeks, which compared the MDT approach with any other organizational strategy in the management of patients with DFUs were considered. Animal studies were excluded. A search of Medline and Embase databases was performed up until the May 1st, 2023. Patients managed by an MDT were reported to have better outcomes in terms of healing, minor and major amputation, and survival in comparison with those managed using other approaches. No data were found on quality of life, returning-to-walking, and emergency admission. Authors concluded that the MDT may be effective in improving outcomes in patients with DFUs.

Diabetes is a chronic disease associated with numerous complications including diabetic foot disorders, which are associated with significant morbidity and mortality as well as high costs. The costs associated with diabetic foot disorders comprise those linked to care (direct) and loss of productivity and poor quality of life (indirect). Due to the constant increase in diabetes prevalence, it is expected that diabetic foot disorder will require more resources, both in terms of caregivers and economically. We reviewed findings on management, morbidity, mortality, and costs related to diabetic foot disorder.

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) has a poor prognosis and high amputation rate. We previously used the French National Health Data System (Système National des Données de Santé: SNDS) to analyze the impact of deprivation and healthcare access on DFU prognosis. The purpose of this ancillary study was to explore the relationship between the global care pathway (care consumption) the year before and after DFU and the risk of amputation.

We conducted a study based on a cohort from the SNDS. The data came from a region of France and subjects living with a complication of DFU. We looked at care consumption one year before and one year after wound onset. Risk of amputation was calculated one year after DFU onset.

Data were extracted for 6,642 patients. Subjects with DFU had a better prognosis regarding amputation risk when they are taking cardiovascular, antibiotic, neurological, drugs. A consultation with an ophthalmologist was also linked to a better prognosis: HR = 0.71 IC95 (0.499-0.995) (p = 0.04).

People with the best diabetes follow-up, even with several comorbidities, appear to have a better prognosis for their DFU. This highlights the importance of global healthcare and the care pathway in this chronic disease.

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the rate of readmission in patients affected by diabetes and foot ulcers (DFUs), and causes and outcomes of patients requiring a new hospitalization. The current study is a retrospective observational study including patients who have required hospitalization since January 2019 to September 2022 due to a DFU. Once patients were discharged, they were regularly followed as outpatients. Within 6 months of follow-up, the rate of hospital readmission for a diabetic foot problem was recorded. According to the readmission or not, patients were divided into 2 groups, readmitted and not readmitted patients, respectively. Hence, all patients were followed for 6 months more and outcomes of the 2 groups were analyzed and compared. Overall, 310 patients were included. The mean age was 68  ±  12 years, the majority of patients reported type 2 diabetes (>90%), and the mean diabetes duration was approximately 20 years. Sixty-eight (21.9%) patients were readmitted. The main reason for hospital readmission was the presence of critical limb ischemia (CLI) in the contralateral limb (6.1%), the recurrence of CLI in the previous treated limb (4.5%), and the onset of new infected DFU in the contralateral foot (4.5%). Readmitted patients reported lower rate of healing (51.5% vs 89.2%, P < .0001) and higher rate of major amputation (10.3% vs 4.5%, P  =  .2) in comparison to not readmitted patients. Critical limb ischemia resulted in the only independent predictor of hospital readmission. Hospital readmission is a frequent issue among patients with DFUs, and readmitted patients showed a lower chance of wound healing. Critical limb ischemia resulted in the main cause of new hospitalization.