Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Mar 15, 2016; 8(3): 258-270
Published online Mar 15, 2016. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i3.258
Table 1 Some venous thromboembolic event risk factors in cancer patients
Cancer-relatedPatient-relatedTreatment-related
Reduced mobility
Primary cancer (e.g., pancreatic cancer > colo-rectal cancer)AgeOperation
Stage (IV > III)History of VTEChemotherapy
Histology (e.g., adeno- > squamous cell-carcinoma)Infection/feverCentral line/ port-catheter
Grade (3 > 2)Parenteral nutrition
ThrombocytosisRadiation therapy
Leukocytosis
Acute phase (elevated CRP)
Elevated D-dimer
Table 2 Comprehensive outline of some guidelines focusing on the prevention and treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism
Primary prophylaxis/prevention of VTE in cancer patients
Treatment of cancer-associated VTE
Surgical patientsIn-patients (non surgical)Out-patientsAcute/initialLong-term/secondary prevention
ASCO Guidelines 2013[15]UFH, LMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin), FondaparinuxUFH, LMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin), FondaparinuxNot recommended routinely1 LMWH may be consideredUFH, LMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin, Tinzaparin), FondaparinuxLMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin,Tinzaparin)
A combined regimen of pharmacologic and mechanical prophylaxis may improve efficacy, especially in the highest risk patients.VKA not recommendedVKA (INR 2-3) acceptable if LMWH is not available Use of NOACs is not recommended
Patients undergoing major cancer surgery should receive prophylaxis starting before surgery and continuing for at least 7 to 10 d and it should be considered an extension up to 4 wk in patients undergoing abdominal and pelvic surgeryTreatment of splanchnic or visceral vein thrombi diagnosed incidentally should be considered on a case-by-case basis, considering potential benefits and risks of anticoagulation
ESMO Guidelines 2011[16]LMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin), UFH Fondaparinux not recommendedLMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin), Fondaparinux, UFHNot recommended routinely May be considered in high risk patientsLMWH (Enoxaparin, Dalteparin), UFHTreatment for a total of 6 mo. Initial dose of LMWH 100% for 1 mo, thereafter 5 mo with 75%-80% of the initial dose of LMWH
Cancer patients undergoing elective major abdominal or pelvic surgery should receive in hospital and post-discharge prophylaxis with s.c. LMWH for up to 1 mo after surgery
International Consensus Groupe 2013[17]LMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin, Nadroparin, Tinzaparin), Fondaparinux, UFH For 10 ± 2 d or 25-31 d (28 d) extended use (Bemiparin sodium 3500 IU per day for 28 d)LMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin, Nadroparin, Tinzaparin), Fondaparinux, UFHNot recommended routinely To be considered/recommended: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic lung or pancreatic cancer treated with chemotherapy and having a low bleeding riskLMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin), UFHLMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin) for 3 to 6 mo
British Committee for Standards in Haematology 2015[18]Patients undergoing abdominal and pelvic surgery for cancer should be considered for extended thromboprophylaxisPatients with active or recent cancer should receive thromboprophylaxis throughout their admission unless contraindicated Patients without a history of venous thromboembolism receiving adjuvant hormonal therapies for cancer should not routinely receive thrombo-prophylaxisPatients should be assessed for thrombosis risk and although most do not routinely require thromboprophylaxis, it should be considered for high risk patientsInitial treatment should be with LMWH for six monthsWarfarin and other oral anticoagulants are acceptable alternatives if LMWH is impractical and anticoagulation is indicated Anticoagulation should be continued, taking pt status and wishes and bleeding risk into consideration. There is a rationale but little direct evidence for preferring to continue to use LMWH
Cancer patients with incidental pulmonary embolus or deep vein thrombosis should be therapeutically anticoagulated as for symptomatic disease
Australian Governments National Health and Medical Research Council 2009[19]LMWH, continue for at least 7 to 10 d following major general surgery Consider using extended thromboprophylaxis with LMWH for up to 28 d after major abdominal or pelvic surgery for cancer, especially in patients who are obese, slow to mobilise or have a past history of VTELMWH, UFH--
MAYO CLINIC VTE Prevention and Management Guidelines 2014[20]UFH, LMWH (Enoxaparin, Dalteparin), Fondaparinux Cancer patients undergoing pelvic or abdominal surgery should receive 4 wk of LMWHUFH, LMWH (Enoxaparin, Dalteparin), FondaparinuxUFH, LMWH (Enoxaparin, Dalteparin), Fondaparinux VKA (INR2-3)Anticoagulants are continued until there is no evidence of active malignant disease defined as any evidence of cancer on cross-sectional imaging or any cancer-related treatment (surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy) within the past 6 mo
ASH Guidelines 2013[21]UFH, LMWH, Fondaparinux in all patients undergoing major surgical intervention for malignant disease Prolonged prophylaxis for up to 4 wk may be considered in patients undergoing major abdominal or pelvic surgery for cancer with high-risk features such as residual malignant disease, obesity, and prior history of VTEUFH, LMWH, FondaparinuxRoutine VTE prophylaxis in ambulatory patients receiving chemotherapy is not recommendedLMWHLMWH Continue treatment with LMWH is preferred for at least the initial 6 mo of treatment
German Guidelines[22,23]LMWH, Fondaparinux, (UFH) Patients undergoing abdominal and pelvic surgery for cancer are recommended to get extended thromboprophylaxis (28 to 35 d)LMWH, Fondaparinux, (UFH)LMWH, Patients should be assessed for thrombosis risk and thromboprophylaxis should be considered for high risk patientsLMWH, Fondaparinux, UFHLMWH for 3 to 6 mo If cancer persists extended secundary prophylaxis (with LMWH, VKA, or NOAC) is usefull (till death)
Table 3 Primary prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolic event in gastrointestinal cancers
StudyCancernVTE placeboVTE LMWHVTE U-LMWHRR
PROTECHT1Gastorintestinal2148/2722.7%1.5%-44%
Agnelli et al[68], 2009Pancreas17/365.9%8.3%40%
SAVE-ONCOColo-rectal461/4642.0%1.1%-45%
Agnelli et al[69], 2012Pancreas128/12610.9%2.4%-78%
Stomach207/2041.9%0.5%-75%
FRAGEMPancreas60/6323%3.4%-85%
Maraveyas et al[70], 2012
CONKO 004Pancreas152/1609.9%1.3%-87%
Pelzer et al[71], 2015
Table 4 Assessment scores for prediction of the venous thromboembolic event-risk in cancer out-patients receiving chemotherapy, according to Khorana et al[73], Pabinger et al[75] and Verso et al[76]
Khorana score criteria[73]Score
Primary cancer
With very high risk (pancreas, stomach) (high grade glioma1)2
With high risk (lung, lymphoma, gynecologic, bladder, testicular)1
Platelet count prior to chemotherapy > 350000/μL1
Hb < 10 g/dL or ESA-application1
Leukocyte count prior to chemotherapy > 11000/μL1
Body mass index > 35 kg/m²1
High risk> 3
Vienna prediction score (additional parameters to Khorana score)[75]
D-dimer > 1.44 μg/mL1
Soluble P-selectin > 153.1 μg/mL1
High risk> 4
Protecht prediction score (additional parameters to Khorana score)[76]
Cisplatin or carboplatin1
Gemcitabine1
High risk> 3
Table 5 The CLOT and CATCH studies[80,81]: Study-population characteristics and study outcomes
CLOTCATCHVKADalteparinPVKATinzaparinP
Study-population characteristics
n676900
Women52%59%
Median age (yr)6359
ECOG 0-163%77%
Metastasized cancer67%55%
Brest cancer17.6%9%
Colo-rectal cancer17.8%13%
Lung cancer14.8%12%
Gynecological cancer11.2%23%
Pancreatic cancer4.8%
Urogenital cancers14.2%
Brain cancers5.5%
Hematological cancers10%10%
Study outcomes
VTE15.8%8.0%0.00210.0%6.9%0.07
DVT11.0%4.2%5.32.70.04
Fatal PE2.1%1.7%3.8%3.8%
Non-fatel PE2.7%2.7%0.7%0.4%
Major bleeding4%6%0.252.7%2.9%
CRNM-bleeding16%11%0.03
Any bleeding19%14%0.09
6-mo mortality41%39%41%40%
INR < 230%26%
INR 2-346%47%
Table 6 Take home messages
Patients with gastrointestinal cancers are among those with the highest cancer-associated VTE risk (e.g., pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer)
Primary prevention of VTE should be considered according to an individual risk-benefit estimation
Scoring systems help to identify patients at high VTE risk. These patients may benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation
Usual prophylactic dosages of LMWH may not be effective enough in patients with the highest risk (e.g., pancreatic cancer)
Gastrointestinal cancer patients with VTE should have medical anticoagulation therapy with LMWH for at least three to six months
In patients with gastrointestinal cancers splanchnic vein thrombosis, portal hypertension, hepatopathy-associated coagulation defects (e.g., decreased prothrombin time) and thrombocytopenia may complicate anticoagulation strategies