BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Opinion Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Sep 15, 2026; 18(9): 118614
Published online Sep 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.118614
Table 1 Representative biomarkers and modeling dimensions for prognostic prediction in human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative advanced gastric cancer
Dimension
Representative biomarkers/features
Biological/clinical relevance
Current limitations
MolecularPD-L1, MSI, TMB, EBV, ctDNAReflect tumor immunogenicity and predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitorsHeterogeneity of assays; lack of standardized thresholds
ClinicopathologicalTNM stage, histological differentiation, ECOG performance statusIndicate tumor burden, disease stage, and patient functional statusStatic variables; limited ability to capture dynamic tumor evolution
InflammatoryNLR, PLR, LMR, SIIReflect systemic inflammatory response associated with tumor progressionVariability in cutoff values; influenced by non-cancer conditions
NutritionalAlbumin, PNI, CALLY indexReflect host nutritional and immunological statusSusceptible to comorbidities and acute clinical conditions
Computational modelingNomogram, machine learning, radiomicsEnable individualized risk prediction through integration of multidimensional dataLimited external validation; risk of overfitting; lack of clinical interpretability


Write to the Help Desk