Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Sep 15, 2026; 18(9): 117360
Published online Sep 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.117360
Published online Sep 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.117360
Table 1 Comparative diagnostic performance of biomarker strategies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
| Biomarker/method | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV (30% prevalence) | Key limitations |
| CA19-9 alone | 0.70-0.85[4] | 70%-80% | 70%-90% | 50%-79% | Low early-stage sensitivity; false positives in pancreatitis |
| EV-miRNA panels | 0.85-0.92[42] | 75%-85% | 80%-90% | 64%-79% | Limited specificity; cancer-type overlap |
| ctDNA mutation | 0.65-0.80[12] | 50%-70% | 85%-95% | 59%-84% | Low sensitivity in early disease; requires high-depth sequencing |
| ECD-itMLF (EV-lRNA) | 0.9698[22] | About 90% | About 95% | About 89% | Requires validation in jaundice/diabetes; method standardization needed |
| Multi-omics integration | 0.90-0.95[47] | 80%-90% | 85%-95% | 70%-84% | Complexity; cost; technical standardization |
- Citation: Yuan C, Hu R, Dang SC. Interpretable extracellular vesicle long RNA framework for noninvasive pancreatic cancer diagnosis: A multi-omics artificial intelligence-driven liquid biopsy paradigm. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(9): 117360
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i9/117360.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.117360