BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Opinion Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Nov 15, 2026; 18(11): 120353
Published online Nov 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.120353
Table 1 Proposed dynamic biomarker monitoring in gastric cancer immunotherapy1
Ref.
Timepoint
Assessments
Evidence-based rationale
Jiang et al[38], 2024; Li et al[59], 2025; Jiang et al[60], 2023Baseline (pre-treatment)PD-L1 CPS, MSI status (MMR), EBV status, ctDNA (tumor-informed if possible), CEA/CA19-9/CA72-4(1) PD-L1 CPS, MSI-H/dMMR, and EBV positivity are validated predictive biomarkers for ICI benefit in advanced GC; (2) Baseline ctDNA reflects tumor burden and genomic landscape; tumor-informed assays may offer improved sensitivity compared with tumor-naïve panels; and (3) CEA/CA19-9/CA72-4 are prognostic but not validated predictive markers for ICI response
Jiang et al[38], 2024; Jin et al[45], 2020After 2 cycles (approximately 6-8 weeks)ctDNA kinetics, CEA/CA19-9/CA72-4Early decline or clearance of ctDNA correlates with objective response and improved survival in GC treated with ICIs ± chemotherapy; CEA/CA19-9/CA72-4 decline may reflect treatment response but lacks immunotherapy-specific validation
Jiang et al[61], 2023First radiographic evaluation (approximately 8-12 weeks)CT imaging (RECIST/iRECIST), tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4)Standard efficacy assessment; follow-up every 8-12 weeks is recommended per iRECIST guidelines
Nguyen et al[62], 2025Every 12 weeks thereafterctDNA monitoring (if available), imaging as per protocolSerial ctDNA kinetics may detect molecular progression earlier than imaging; timing, thresholds, and clinical algorithms remain unstandardized in GC
Fan et al[32], 2019; Ayala-Mar et al[33], 2021Exploratory (research setting only)Exo-PD-L1Preliminary GC studies suggest a potential association with disease progression; currently investigational with no standardized clinical application


Write to the Help Desk