Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2025; 17(7): 108650
Published online Jul 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.108650
Table 1 Studies summarize design and outcomes of HAIC-containing regimens for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treatment
Ref.
Year
Study design
Sample size
Patients
Arms
mOS (m)
ORR (%)
DCR (%)
Conversion rate
TrAEs (Grade 3-4)
Zheng et al[25]2024Retrospective202ICCArm 1: FOLFOX-HAIC +TKI+ PD(L)-1; Arm 2: GC /GEMOX20.8 vs 14.835.5 vs 14.577.6 vs 63.2NAElevated AST 145% vs 7.9%; Thrombocytopenia 118% vs 15.8%; Neutropenia 145% vs 14.5%; Abdominal pain 7.9% vs 1.3%
Lin et al[31]2024Retrospective141ICCArm 1: FOLFOX-HAIC+LEN+PD(L)-1; Arm 2: GEMOX/GC +PD(L)-1; Arm 3: GEMOX/GCNR vs NR vs 21.850 vs 18.4 vs 6.088.1 vs 73.5 vs 52.09.5% (4/42) vs 2.0% (1/49) vs 0.0% (0/50)Elevated ALT 48% vs 2.0% vs 4.0%; Elevated AST 48% vs 2.0% vs 2.0%; Neutropenia 24% vs 8.2% vs 10.0%; Vomit 0% vs 12.2% vs 14.0%
Li et al[26]2024Retrospective179ICCArm 1: FOLFOX -HAIC + SYS; Arm 2: SYS15.8 vs 12.755 vs 2784 vs 83NAIncreased ALT or AST levels; 7.2%; thrombocytopenia 48%
Lin et al[27]2024Retrospective90ICCArm 1: GEMOX; HAIC + LEN + PD-1; Arm 2: GC16.8 vs 11.043.1 vs 20.5 90.2 vs 69.2 NAStomach ache 7.8% vs 2.6%; GI bleeding 5.9% vs 2.6%; Hyperbilirubinemia 59% vs 0%; Leukopenia 20% vs 10.3%
Zhao et al[32] 2024Retrospective59 ICCArm 1: FOLFOX-HAIC + LEN + Durvalumab; Arm 2: GC + Durvalumab15.8 vs 9.676.9.% vs 17.4% (mRECIST) 92.3% vs 56.5% (mRECIST) NAElevated ALT 129% vs 3.6%; Anemia 65% vs 3.6%; Thrombocytopenia 97% vs 7.1%; Abdominal pain 3.2% vs 10.7%
Huang et al[33]2024Retrospective46ICCFOLFOX-HAIC + LEN + PD-116.7747.891.36.5% (3/46) Neutropenia 217%; Thrombocytopenia 174%; Elevated ALT 130%; Elevated AST 87%
Li et al[34]2024Retrospective34Hilar CCAmFOLFOX7-HAIC+ Capecitabine + Camrelizumab20.061.897.0NAFatigue 59%; Rash 2.9%
Song et al[35]2024Retrospective28ICCmFOLFOX6-HAIC + Toripalimab + SurufatinibNR5879NAAbdominal pain 7.2%; Leukopenia 72% Thrombocytopenia 7.2%
Zhao et al[36]2024Retrospective28ICCFOLFOX-HAIC + LEN + Durvalumab17.965.2 (mRECIST) 91.31 (mRECIST) 10.7% (3/28)Elevated ALT 143; Thrombocytopenia 107%; Anemia 71%; Abdominal pain 7.1%
Ni et al[37]2024Retrospective21ICCGEMOX-HAIC + GEM + LEN + PD-119.552.376.119% (4/21) Hypertension 28.6%; Hand-foot syndrome 19%; Myelosuppression 14.3%
Yang et al[28]2023Retrospective146 ICCArm 1: mFOLFOX-HAIC; Arm 2: GC or GEMOX18.0 vs 17.845.3 vs 21.1 (mRECIST) 88 vs 88.7 (mRECIST) NAAbdominal pain 4% vs 0%; Vomit 1.3% vs 11.2%; Neutropenia 13% vs 5.6%; Elevated AST 27% vs 2.8%
Wei et al[38]2023Retrospective55CCAArm 1: FOLFOX-HAIC+LEN+PD-1; Arm 2: FOLFOX-HAIC+LEN16.0 vs 11.028.6 vs 20.080 vs 65HAIC+LEN+PD-1 arm: 17.1% (6/35) vs HAIC+LEN arm: 10% (2/20)Hypertension 42.9% vs 45%; Immune-mediated pneumonia 86% vs 0%; Hand-foot syndrome 86% vs 20%; GI bleeding 5.7 vs 5%
Wang et al[39]2023Retrospective41CCAArm 1: FOLFOX-HAIC + LEN; Arm 2: FOLFOX-HAIC32 vs 1015.8 vs 13.684.2 vs 63.6HAIC + LEN arm 21.0% (4/19) vs HAIC arm 13.6% (3/22)Hypertension Grade 157% vs 0%; Fever 10.5% vs 0%; Thrombocytopenia 105% vs 4.5%; Leukocytopenia 105% vs 4.5%
Zhang et al[40]2022Retrospective58ICCArm 1: GEMOX-HAIC + TKI + PD-1; Arm 2: TACE + TKI + PD-1NR61.5 vs 21.1 (mRECIST) 82.1 vs 36.8 (mRECIST) 15.4% (6/39) vs 0% (0/19)Elevated AST 154%; Nausea/vomiting 12.8%; Hyperbilirubinemia 128%; Neutropenia 103%
Ishii et al[24]2022Retrospective42ICCArm 1: GEM-FP-HAIC (no prior chemo); Arm 2: GEM-FP-HAIC (post-GC); Arm 3: SC (GC-refractory)20.6 vs 6.3 vs 3.737.5 vs 0 vs NA75 vs 80 vs NANAAnemia 333%; Thrombocytopenia 222%; leukopenia 56%; Hyperbilirubinemia 56%
Huang et al[30]2022Real-World Study9ICCFOLFIRI-HAIC822.255.5NAAscites 22.2%; Hyperbilirubinemia 222%; Elevated ALT or AST 222%; Vomit 11.1%
Cai et al[41]2021Retrospective126ICCArm 1: mFOLFOX -HAIC; Arm 2: TACE19.6 vs 10.8NANANAMyelosuppression 24.6%; Vomit: 10.5%
Kasai et al[42]2014Prospective20 ICC5-FU-HAIC+ PEG-IFNα-2b14.660.090.05% (1/20) Leukopenia 10%; Thrombocytopenia 10%; Anemia 10%