Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2025; 17(7): 108205
Published online Jul 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.108205
Published online Jul 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.108205
Table 1 Clinical baseline characteristics of 112 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, n (%)
Characteristics | All patients, n = 112 | G1-G3 ALC nadir, n = 80 | G4 ALC nadir, n = 32 | P value |
Gender | 0.041 | |||
Male | 83 (74.1) | 55 (68.8) | 28 (87.5) | |
Female | 29 (25.9) | 25 (31.3) | 4 (12.5) | |
Age, years | 0.064 | |||
≤ 67 | 58 (51.8) | 37 (46.3) | 21 (65.6) | |
> 67 | 54 (48.2) | 43 (53.8) | 11 (34.4) | |
BMI | 0.501 | |||
< 24 kg/m2 | 68 (60.7) | 47 (58.8) | 21 (65.6) | |
≥ 24 | 44 (39.3) | 33 (41.3) | 11 (34.4) | |
Tumor length (cm) | 0.509 | |||
≤ 5 | 51 (45.5) | 38 (47.5) | 13 (40.6) | |
> 5 | 61 (54.5) | 42 (52.5) | 19 (59.4) | |
T stage | 0.509 | |||
T1 + T2 | 51 (45.5) | 38 (47.5) | 12 (37.5) | |
T3 + T4 | 61 (54.5) | 42 (52.5) | 20 (62.5) | |
N stage | 0.017 | |||
N0 | 17 (15.2) | 14 (17.5) | 3 (9.4) | |
N1 | 67 (59.8) | 52 (65.0) | 15 (46.9) | |
N2 | 28 (25.0) | 14 (17.5) | 14 (43.8) | |
Clinical stage | 0.003 | |||
I + II | 73 (65.2) | 59 (73.8) | 14 (43.8) | |
III | 39 (34.8) | 21 (26.3) | 18 (56.3) | |
RT dose | 0.336 | |||
≤ 60 Gy | 62 (55.4) | 42 (52.5) | 20 (62.5) | |
> 60 Gy | 50 (44.6) | 38 (47.5) | 12 (37.5) | |
Treatment regimen | 0.244 | |||
RT alone | 41 (36.6) | 33 (41.3) | 8 (25.0) | |
Sequential CRT | 27 (24.1) | 17 (21.3) | 10 (31.3) | |
Concurrent CRT | 44 (39.3) | 30 (37.5) | 14 (43.8) | |
RT technique | 0.321 | |||
ENI | 41 (36.6) | 27 (33.8) | 14 (43.8) | |
IFI | 71 (63.4) | 53 (66.3) | 18 (56.3) |
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate regression analyses of factors affecting clinical outcomes
Characteristics | OS | PFS | ||||||
Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
m-OS (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | m-PFS (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | |
Gender | 0.810 | 0.907 | ||||||
Male | 23.2 (14.8-31.7) | 18.2 (10.4-26.0) | ||||||
Female | 23.4 (20.0-26.8) | 16.8 (11.9-21.7) | ||||||
Age | 0.947 | 0.764 | ||||||
≤ 67 years | 23.2 (12.1-34.4) | 13.4 (6.4-20.4) | ||||||
> 67 years | 23.1 (16.1-30.2) | 18.6 (12.8-24.5) | ||||||
BMI | 0.649 | 0.742 | ||||||
< 24 kg/m2 | 23.1 (17.0-29.2) | 15.8 (9.4-22.2) | ||||||
≥ 24 | 23.2 (15.7-30.7) | 17.3 (11.0-23.6) | ||||||
Tumor length | 0.002 | 1.88 (1.14-3.12) | 0.014 | 0.012 | 1.08 (0.13-8.76) | 0.942 | ||
≤ 5 cm | 42.1 (27.3-56.8) | 25.0 (1.0-49.1) | ||||||
> 5 cm | 17.0 (7.7-26.2) | 11.9 (9.0-14.8) | ||||||
T stage | 0.002 | 1.88 (1.14-3.12) | 0.014 | 0.012 | 1.62 (0.19-13.84) | 0.66 | ||
T1-T2 | 42.1 (27.3-56.8) | 25.0 (1.0-49.1) | ||||||
T3-T4 | 17.0 (7.7-26.2) | 11.9 (9.0-14.8) | ||||||
N stage | 0.000 | 0.55 (0.34-1.00) | 0.051 | 0.000 | 0.38 (0.15-1.01) | 0.053 | ||
N0 | - | - | ||||||
N1 | 24.4 (19.1-29.7) | 17.3 (10.9-23.7) | ||||||
N2 | 12.3 (10.4-14.3) | 6.6 (4.6-8.7) | ||||||
TNM stage | 0.000 | 0.44 (0.19-1.03) | 0.058 | 0.000 | 2.24 (1.35-3.71) | 0.002 | ||
I + II | 32.4 (18.7-46.0) | 25.0 (1.2-48.9) | ||||||
III | 11.8 (7.5-16.0) | 6.6 (5.6-7.6) | ||||||
RT dose | 0.110 | 0.540 | ||||||
≤ 60 Gy | 22.8 (15.8-29.8) | 13.4 (8.4-18.4) | ||||||
> 60 Gy | 29.3 (12.5-46.0) | 18.6 (14.1-23.1) | ||||||
Treatment regimen | 0.042 | 1.59 (0.88-2.86) | 0.093 | 0.033 | 1.83 (0.19-1.03) | 0.058 | ||
RT alone | 22.4 (17.5-27.3) | 14.2 (7.3-21.0) | ||||||
Sequential CRT | 14.0 (9.7-18.2) | 9.9 (0.8-19.0) | ||||||
Concurrent CRT | 38.4 (16.5-60.4) | - | ||||||
RT technique | 0.028 | 0.77 (0.44-1.36) | 0.364 | 0.001 | 2.34 (1.32-4.14) | 0.004 | ||
ENI | 42.1 (25.1-59.0) | - | ||||||
IFI | 22.4 (16.5-28.3) | 12.7 (9.7-15.7) | ||||||
ALC nadir | 0.013 | 1.98 (1.20-3.28) | 0.008 | 0.006 | 1.87 (1.09-3.20) | 0.023 | ||
G1-G3 | 26.3 (19.8-32.7) | 20.2 (13.3-27.0) | ||||||
G4 | 11.5 (6.5-16.6) | 6.8 (5.5-8.1) | ||||||
ALC nadir time | 0.041 | 1.23 (0.73-2.06) | 0.443 | 0.360 | ||||
1-4 week | 16.7 (6.8-26.5) | 14.2 (6.8-21.5) | ||||||
5-6 week | 29.9 (14.5-45.2) | 17.3 (8.3-26.3) |
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analyses of variables associated with grade 4 lymphocytopenia
Characteristics | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
OR | P value | OR | P value | |
Gender (male vs female) | 3.182 | 0.048 | 4.928 | 0.045 |
Age (≤ 67 years vs > 67 years) | 0.451 | 0.067 | ||
BMI (< 24 vs ≥ 24 kg/m2) | 0.746 | 0.502 | ||
Tumor length (≤ 5 cm vs > 5 cm) | 1.322 | 0.510 | ||
T stage (1+2 vs 3+4) | 1.322 | 0.510 | ||
N stage (0 vs 1 vs 2) | 2.549 | 0.011 | 0.683 | 0.176 |
TNM stage (I+II vs III) | 3.612 | 0.003 | 6.754 | 0.003 |
Treatment regimen RT alone vs SCRT vs CCRT | 1.351 | 0.219 | ||
RT technique ENI vs IFI | 0.655 | 0.322 | ||
Dosimetric parameters of OARs | ||||
Heart V5 (≤ 93% vs > 93%) | 3.458 | 0.006 | 0.518 | 0.228 |
Heart V10 (≤ 86% vs > 86%) | 3.833 | 0.003 | 12.808 | 0.046 |
Aorta V5 (≤ 85% vs > 85%) | 2.829 | 0.019 | 1.054 | 0.955 |
Aorta V30 (≤ 78% vs > 78%) | 2.374 | 0.044 | 1.288 | 0.713 |
Thoracic vertebrae Dmean (≤ 32 Gy vs > 32 Gy) | 4.259 | 0.001 | 0.470 | 0.339 |
Thoracic vertebrae V5 (≤ 69% vs > 69%) | 3.300 | 0.007 | 0.803 | 0.822 |
Thoracic vertebrae V10 (≤ 67% vs > 67%) | 3.133 | 0.010 | 1.938 | 0.462 |
Lung Dmean (≤ 13 Gy vs >13 Gy) | 2.719 | 0.022 | 0.873 | 0.092 |
Lung V5 (≤ 58% vs > 58%) | 3.300 | 0.007 | 5.324 | 0.048 |
Lung V10 (≤ 42% vs > 42%) | 3.640 | 0.004 | 0.646 | 0.187 |
Lung V20 (≤ 25% vs > 25%) | 2.864 | 0.016 | 7.631 | 0.031 |
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses of subgroups associated with grade 4 lymphocytopenia
Characteristics | RT alone | Sequential CRT | Concurrent CRT | |||
Univariate P | Multivariate P | Univariate P | Multivariate P | Univariate P | Multivariate P | |
Gender (male vs female) | 0.952 | 0.097 | 0.092 | |||
Age (≤ 67 years vs > 67 years) | 0.816 | 0.590 | 0.226 | |||
BMI (< 24 vs ≥ 24 kg/m2) | 0.292 | 0.384 | 0.541 | |||
Tumor length (≤ 5 cm vs > 5 cm) | 0.800 | 0.081 | 0.679 | |||
T stage (1+2 vs 3+4) | 0.800 | 0.081 | 0.976 | |||
N stage (0 vs 1 vs 2) | 0.358 | 0.146 | 0.355 | |||
TNM stage (I+II vs III) | 0.099 | 0.212 | 0.050 | |||
RT technique ENI vs IFI | 0.964 | 0.656 | 0.533 | |||
Dosimetric parameters of OARs | ||||||
Heart V5 (≤ 93% vs > 93%) | 0.037 | 0.051 | 0.013 | 0.039 | 0.015 | 0.048 |
Heart V10 (≤ 86% vs > 86%) | 0.058 | 0.037 | 0.001 | 0.509 | 0.026 | 0.033 |
Aorta V5 (≤ 85% vs > 85%) | 0.817 | 0.160 | 0.032 | 0.926 | ||
Aorta V30 (≤ 78% vs > 78%) | 0.380 | 0.384 | 0.195 | |||
Thoracic vertebrae Dmean (≤ 32 Gy vs > 32 Gy) | 0.129 | 0.093 | 0.032 | 0.612 | ||
Thoracic vertebrae V5 (≤ 69% vs > 69%) | 0.380 | 0.401 | 0.018 | 0.485 | ||
Thoracic vertebrae V10 (≤ 67% vs > 67%) | 0.380 | 0.401 | 0.018 | 0.895 | ||
Lung Dmean (≤ 13 Gy vs > 13 Gy) | 0.022 | 0.483 | 0.160 | 0.276 | ||
Lung V5 (≤ 58% vs > 58%) | 0.019 | 0.039 | 0. 016 | 0.045 | 0.013 | 0.043 |
Lung V10 (≤ 42% vs > 42%) | 0.012 | 0.053 | 0.026 | 0.084 | 0.016 | 0.135 |
Lung V20 (≤ 25% vs > 25%) | 0.029 | 0.064 | 0.039 | 0.054 | 0.033 | 0.012 |
Table 5 Comparison of different grades of lymphocytopenia with different CoTNM-Heart V10, CoTNM-Lung V5, and CoTNM- Lung V20 score values
No. | G1-G3 80 (%) | G4 32 (%) | χ2 | P value | |
CoTNM-heartV10 | 16.697 | 0.000 | |||
0 score | 40 | 37 (46.3) | 3 (9.4) | ||
1 score | 50 | 33 (41.3) | 17 (53.1) | ||
2 score | 22 | 10 (12.5) | 12 (27.5) | ||
CoTNM-lungV5 | 10.997 | 0.004 | |||
0 score | 40 | 35 (43.8) | 5 (15.6) | ||
1 score | 33 | 24 (30.0) | 9 (28.1) | ||
2 score | 39 | 21 (26.3) | 18 (56.3) | ||
CoTNM-lungV20 | 16.923 | 0.000 | |||
0 score | 42 | 35 (43.8) | 7 (21.9) | ||
1 score | 48 | 37 (46.3) | 11 (34.4) | ||
2 score | 22 | 8 (10.0) | 14 (43.8) |
Table 6 Effect of CoTNM-heart V10, CoTNM-Lung V5, and CoTNM-lung V20 on overall survival and progression-free survival
Characteristics | N | Median OS | OS (%) | χ2 | P value | Median PFS | PFS (%) | χ2 | P value | ||||
1 year | 2 years | 3 years | 1 year | 2 years | 3 years | ||||||||
CoTNM- heartV10 | 5.446 | 0.066 | 5.418 | 0.067 | |||||||||
0 score | 40 | 26.3 | 87.5 | 52.5 | 44.4 | 20.2 | 70.0 | 46.6 | 43.7 | ||||
1 score | 50 | 24.8 | 68.0 | 54.0 | 42.5 | 17.3 | 61.7 | 40.5 | 37.8 | ||||
2 score | 22 | 11.8 | 50.0 | 31.8 | 26.5 | 6.6 | 36.4 | 31.2 | 20.8 | ||||
CoTNM-lungV5 | 17.499 | 0.000 | 17.440 | 0.000 | |||||||||
0 score | 40 | - | 82.5 | 62.5 | 54.6 | 20.2 | 75.0 | 48.5 | 45.9 | ||||
1 score | 33 | 29.9 | 84.8 | 57.6 | 44.9 | - | 72.5 | 53.2 | 49.1 | ||||
2 score | 39 | 11.8 | 48.7 | 28.2 | 21.2 | 6.6 | 33.3 | 22.2 | 15.2 | ||||
CoTNM-lungV20 | 14.068 | 0.001 | 11.122 | 0.004 | |||||||||
0 score | 42 | 28.5 | 85.7 | 57.1 | 49.0 | 17.6 | 69.0 | 47.6 | 45.0 | ||||
1 score | 48 | 24.4 | 72.9 | 52.1 | 40.8 | 20.2 | 64.3 | 43.9 | 39.1 | ||||
2 score | 22 | 7.7 | 40.9 | 27.3 | 21.8 | 5.8 | 31.8 | 21.2 | 14.1 |
- Citation: Li SG, Liu Y, Zhang XY, Li YM, Shen WB, Zhu SC. Effects of radiotherapy on lymphocytes in patients with middle and lower esophageal cancer and its relationship with prognosis. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(7): 108205
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i7/108205.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.108205