Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2025; 17(6): 106154
Published online Jun 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i6.106154
Published online Jun 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i6.106154
Table 1 General demographic data of patients in each group, n (%)/mean ± SD
Group | Number of cases | Sex | Age (years) | Disease duration (years) | BMI | Comorbidities | ||
Women | Men | Yes | No | |||||
Control group | 60 | 28 (46.67) | 32 (53.33) | 71.83 ± 2.52 | 5.87 ± 1.55 | 24.00 ± 4.08 | 27 (45.00) | 33 (55.00) |
Observation Group | 60 | 25 (41.67) | 35 (58.33) | 73.67 ± 2.43 | 5.68 ± 1.94 | 24.15 ± 4.00 | 24 (40.00) | 36 (60.00) |
t/χ² | 0.304 | -4.060 | 0.572 | 0.569 | 0.307 | |||
P value | 0.581 | 0.529 | 0.081 | -0.203 | 0.580 |
Table 2 Comparison of Self-Rating Anxiety Scale scores between groups, mean ± SD
Group | Number of cases | Before care | After care | t value | P value |
Control group | 60 | 58.83 ± 2.55 | 48.85 ± 2.53 | 19.767 | 0.000 |
Observation group | 60 | 59.77 ± 2.42 | 38.45 ± 2.53 | 48.041 | 0.000 |
t value | -2.051 | 22.497 | |||
P value | 0.761 | 0.006 |
Table 3 Comparison of Self-Rating Depression Scale scores between groups, mean ± SD
Group | Number of cases | Before care | After care | t value | P value |
Control group | 60 | 56.42 ± 2.62 | 48.77 ± 2.63 | 16.056 | 0.000 |
Observation group | 60 | 56.37 ± 2.44 | 38.48 ± 2.41 | 41.664 | 0.000 |
t value | 0.108 | 22.345 | |||
P value | 0.433 | 0.028 |
Table 4 Comparison of patient adherence between groups, n (%)
Group | Number of cases | Full attachment | Partial attachment | Non-attachment | Total attachment |
Control group | 60 | 17 (28.33) | 24 (40.00) | 19 (31.67) | 42 (68.33) |
Observation group | 60 | 32 (53.33) | 22 (36.67) | 6 (10.00) | 54 (90.00) |
χ² | 11.439 | ||||
P value | 0.003 |
Table 5 Comparison of Visual Analogue Scale scores between groups, mean ± SD
Group | Number of cases | Before care | After care | t value | P value |
Control group | 60 | 26.53 ± 2.70 | 52.82 ± 2.63 | -25.111 | 0.000 |
Observation group | 60 | 26.23 ± 2.45 | 38.43 ± 2.45 | -54.144 | 0.000 |
t value | 0.638 | 30.967 | |||
P value | 0.114 | 0.037 |
Table 6 Comparison of patient care satisfaction between groups, n (%)
Group | Number of cases | Very satisfied | More satisfied | Dissatisfied | Overall satisfied |
Control group | 60 | 16 (26.67) | 23 (38.33) | 21 (35.00) | 39 (65.00) |
Observation group | 60 | 36 (60.00) | 22 (36.67) | 2 (3.33) | 58 (96.67) |
χ² | 23.410 | ||||
P value | 0.000 |
- Citation: Dai YH, Zhuo-Ma SL, Luo YH. Effect of gastrointestinal endoscopy center care on the psychological state and pain level of colorectal cancer patients. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(6): 106154
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i6/106154.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i6.106154