Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Mar 15, 2020; 12(3): 311-322
Published online Mar 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i3.311
Table 1 Patient characteristics
Characteristicn = 82
Age (yr)
Median (range)64 (34–79)
Sex
Male60 (73.2)
Female22 (26.8)
Distance from anal verge (cm)
Median (range)5.0 (0–8)
Size of tumor (cm)
Median (range)4.5 (2–9)
Clinical T stage (before chemoradiotherapy)
372 (87.8)
410 (12.2)
Mesorectal fascia invasion
53 (64.6)
+29 (35.4)
Extramural vascular invasion
46 (56.1)
+36 (43.9)
Clinical N stage (before chemoradiotherapy)
36 (43.9)
+46 (56.1)
Subgroup of locally advanced rectal cancer
Bad50 (61.0)
Ugly32 (39.0)
UGT1A1 polymorphism (in 48 patients)
Wild type25 (52.1)
Mutant type23 (47.9)
Table 2 Acute toxicity according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0, on patients receiving chemoradiotherapy, n (%)
Toxicityn = 82
Any GradeGrade 3 or 4
Hematological toxicity
Neutropenia56 (68.3)16 (19.5)
Leukopenia59 (72.0)15 (18.3)
Febrile neutropenia3 (3.6)3 (3.6)
Thrombocytopenia11 (13.4)0
Nonhematological toxicity
Diarrhea53 (64.6)22 (26.8)
Anorexia20 (24.4)1 (1.2)
Fatigue15 (18.3)0
Nausea13 (15.9)0
Table 3 Associations between toxicity, feasibility and treatment effect and UGT1A1 polymorphisms, n (%)
Wild type (n = 25)Mutant type (n = 23)P value
Toxicity
Hematological toxicity (Grade 3 or 4)011 (47.8)< 0.01
Nonhematological toxicity (Grade 3 or 4)8 (32.0)6 (26.1)0.65
Feasibility (%)
S-1 dose intensity (mean ± SD)90.9 ± 0.289.0 ± 0.20.38
CPT-11 dose intensity (mean ± SD)93.0 ± 0.388.2 ± 0.20.26
Treatment effect
Good response18 (72.0)22 (95.7)< 0.01
Poor response7 (28.0)1 (4.3)
Pathological complete response5 (20.0)6 (26.1)0.61
Table 4 Postoperative surgical complications, n (%)
Complicationn = 82
Any gradeGrade 3
Pelvic infection15 (18.3)9 (11.0)
Anastomosis leakage19 (12.2)7 (9.5)
Ileus11 (13.4)5 (6.1)
Bleeding1 (1.2)1 (1.2)
Surgical site infection2 (2.4)0
Urinary dysfunction8 (9.8)0
Venous thromboembolic event1 (1.2)0
Re-operation00
Table 5 Pathological tumor characteristics, n (%)
Pathological tumor characteristicsn = 82
ypT stage
013 (15.9)
15 (6.1)
221 (25.6)
325 (42.7)
48 (9.8)
ypN stage
65 (79.3)
+17 (20.7)
yp TNM stage1
013 (15.9)
I20 (24.4)
II32 (39.0)
III17 (20.7)
Residual tumor classification
R079 (96.3)
R13 (3.7)
R20
Histology
well/moderately differentiated66 (80.5)
Poorly differentiated/mucinous/signet16 (19.5)
T downstaging
41 (50.0)
+41 (50.0)
N downstaging
46 (56.1)
+36 (43.9)
Tumor regression grade
1a18 (22.0)
1b12 (14.6)
239 (47.6)
313 (15.9)
Adjuvant chemotherapy
56 (68.3)
+26 (31.7)
Table 6 Multivariate prognostic analysis for local recurrence-free survival and relapse-free survival
FactorsnLFS
RFS
Univariate
Multivariate
Univariate
Multivariate
OR95%CIP valueOR95%CIP valueOR95%CIP valueOR95%CIP value
Sex
Female22
Male601.910.21-17.70.561.130.36-3.600.83
Location from anal verge (cm)
≥ 5.029
< 5.0531.100.19-6.410.911.890.61-5.890.26
Tumor diameter (cm)
< 4.542
≥ 4.5402.000.86-2.890.430.630.22-1.740.37
cT
372
4104.250.67-27.00.101.970.23-17.10.543.800.97-14.90.062.050.39-10.70.39
cN
36
+461.620.28-9.380.591.250.34-2.600.90
Mesorectal fascia invasion
53
+294.080.70-23.80.102.880.39-21.50.307.312.39-22.4< 0.015.821.68-20.2< 0.01
Extramural vascular invasion
46
+362.750.47-15.90.243.151.10-9.030.033.421.02-11.50.04
Lateral lymph node (> 7.0 mm)
74
+85.830.88-38.70.094.710.65-34.20.122.010.44-9.290.36
Histology
Well/moderately differentiated66
Poorly differentiated/mucinous/signet160.810.09-7.490.861.550.46-7.585.15