Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Aug 15, 2018; 10(8): 211-220
Published online Aug 15, 2018. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i8.211
Table 1 Studies for pancreatic cancer
nAgeNo. of hepatic metastasesMedian size of liver metastasesChemotherapyMortality rate
Hackert et al[39], 2017856096% had 3 lesions 3 had > 3 lesions31% had 1-2 cm 43% had < 1 cm74% received Adjuvant gemcitabine or 5 FU2.90%
Crippa et al[34], 20161165 (35-80)10% had 1 28% had 1-5 61% had > 5NANeoadjuvant gemcitabine (14%), 30% gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel while 66% had FOLFIRINOX, PEFG, PEXG or PDXG0
Tachezy et al[38], 20166965 (31-83)2 (1-11)NANeoadjuvant gemcitabine in 4% or FOLFIRINOX in 14%. Adjuvant in 80%, 80% got gemcitabine and 7% FOLFIRINOX1%
Zanini et al[35], 20151555 (52-64)2 (1-3) 60% had 1 lesion2.2 cm (1.8-2.5)Adjuvant gemcitabine0
Klein et al[33], 20122257.5 (31-78)NANAAdjuvant gemcitabine0
Dünschede et al[40], 2010955 (39-72)3 (1-5)3.5 (1-9)0
Gleisner et al[37], 20071764.7 ± 11.41 (1-1)0.6 (0.3-1.2)6 received 5FU or gemcitabine9.10%
Shrikhande et al[36], 19961165 (60-74)2 (1-3)NAAdjuvant Gemcitabine or 5FU or radiation0
Table 2 Results by outcome for pancreatic cancer
N
Median OS(mo)
95%CI
N
Median OS (mo)
95%CI
P-value
ResectionNo resection
Positive studies
Hackert et al[39]8512.3NA
Tachezy et al[38]691410.8-18.2697.54.9–10.2< 0.001
Crippa et al[34]113911611< 0.0001
Klein et al[33]2216.6NA
Yamada et al[75]1110.1286.8NS
Shrikhande et al[36]1111.47.8-16.51185.95.4-7.60.04
Negative studies
Zanini et al[35]159.18.6-9.7NA
Dünschede et al[40]98 (4-16)511 (10-12)
Gleisner et al[37]225.9665.60.46
Takada et al[42]116 (2-10)333 (2-9)
Table 3 Studies for biliary tract cancer
NAge (yr)No. and size of hepatic metastasesTreatmentMedian OS (mo)Mortality RateSurvival rate %
Kurosaki et al[47], 2011Distal bile duct (n = 7) Ampullary cancer (n = 6)65 ± 10Median no = 2 (1-3) Median size 3 cm (1.8-6 cm)Adjuvant cisplatin + 5 FU or gemcitabine or S1 (n = 10)Bile duct = 14 Ampullary = 20-5-yr = 44.9%
Bresadola et al[49], 2011Gall bladder (n = 5) Papilla of Vater (n = 3) Biliary tract (n = 1)56 (46-64)--Gall bladder = 5 (1-12) Papilla of Vater = 7 (5-71) Biliary tract = 173%
de Jong et al[48], 2010Ampullary (n = 10) Duodenal (n = 5) Biliary (n = 5) Pancreas (n = 20)63.0 ± 10.6Median no 1(1-5) and median size 0.7 (0.2-5.9)Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (pancreatic n = 4 ampullary n = 2 duodenal n = 1) Adjuvant chemotherapy n = 22 (55%) Gemcitabine (n = 14) 5-fluruoracil (n = 4), cyclophosphamide (n = 2) Combination irinotecan (n = 3)Intestinal type = 23 Pancreatobiliary = 135%3-yr survival Intestinal tumours = 33% Pancreatobiliary tumours = 8%
Wakai et al[45], 2008Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; adeno- carcinoma (n = 2) Gall bladder; adeno-squamous (n = 1)63 (35-79)--Bile duct = 8 and 15 gall Bladder = 921%5 yr = Extra hepatic 12% Gall bladder 9%
Gleisner et al[37], 2007Ampullary (n = 1) Duodenal (n = 2) Distal bile duct (n = 2) Histology Adenocarcinoma65(53–82)Median no = 1 and median size 0.6 cm (0.3-1.2)FOLFIRI given to duodenal cancer9.99.10%3 yr = 6.7%
Adam et al[13], 2006Ampullary (n = 15) Pancreatic (n = 41) Gallbladder (n = 23) Biliary (n = 5)53 (10-87)--Ampullary = 38-5 yr Ampullary = 46% The entire cohort = 27%
Fuji et al[46], 1999Bile duct (n = 2) (adenocarcinoma) Ampulla of vater (n = 2) Duodenal cancer (n = 3)58 (36-67)Median no = 1-20-3 yr = 28%
Table 4 Results by outcome for biliary tract cancer
N
Median OS (mo)
95%CI
N
Median OS (mo)
95%CI
ResectionNo resection or palliative surgery
Positive studies
Fujii et al[46]720NA
Kurosaki et al[47]1328-6096-12
Niguma et al[50]1017.2124.4
de Jong et al[48]817-1977< 0.01
Adam et al[13]1538NA
Negative studies
Gleisner et al[37]59.960.43
Wakai et al[45]39NA
Bresadola et al[49]715NA