The incidence of early onset gastric cancer(EOGC) is increasing. However, few studies have focused on early onset early stage gastric cancer(EEGC). The aim of this study was to determine the threshold age of patients with EOGC, identify the clinicopathological characteristics associated with lymph node metastasis(LNM) in EEGC, and develop a predictive model for LNM in EEGC.

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including 1765 patients with early-stage gastric cancer. Logistic inflection point and stratified analysis were used to determine the threshold age. 266 patients met the criteria for EEGC and were included for further analysis. The patients were divided into two groups for the purposes of the study: a training dataset and an external validation dataset. The division of patients into these two groups was conducted in accordance with the time of surgery, with the ratio of patients in each group being approximately 7:3.Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to identify LNM risk factors. A predictive nomogram was developed and validated using calibration plots and the area under the curve (AUC).The constructed logistic regression model was then validated using the external validation dataset.

The threshold age for EOGC was determined to be 45 years. Of the 266 patients with EEGC, 20.7% had LNM. Tumor maximum diameter and lymphovascular invasion were identified as independent risk factors for LNM. The nomogram demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with an AUC of 0.809.

This study demonstrated that tumor maximum diameter and lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors for LNM in EEGC. The predictive nomogram showed promising accuracy and might assist in identifying patients at higher risk of LNM, potentially informing treatment strategies. Given the relatively high LNM rate, endoscopic submucosal dissection may not be suitable for EEGC patients. Further large-scale multicenter studies are needed to deepen the understanding of this population and to confirm these findings.

Dyspepsia is associated with a variety of benign and malignant gastrointestinal diseases. The aim of the study was to evaluate the spectrum of upper gastrointestinal endoscopic findings in patients presenting with dyspepsia.

This is a retrospective study on consecutive patients with dyspepsia undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at the gastroenterology department of Thingangyun General Hospital, University of Medicine 2, Yangon, from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019.

In this study, 1650 patients were recruited retrospectively. Forty-nine patients were excluded due to incomplete data entry. There were 883 female (55%) out of 1601 patients. The mean age was 50.5 ± 15.82 years. The endoscopic findings were gastric/duodenal erosion (10.8%), erosive esophagitis (5.1%), duodenal ulcer (3.5%), gastric ulcer (4.4%), gastroesophageal varices (3.49%), esophageal cancer (0.8%), and gastric cancer (5.3%); in which early-onset gastric cancer contributed for 17.6%. Miscellaneous diagnoses were 4.2%, and findings were normal at 62.5%. Significant endoscopy findings were diagnosed in patients over 45 years of age. Helicobacter pylori infection was found in 40.6% of the total study population, 52% of gastric cancers, 50% of gastric ulcers, 51.2% of duodenal ulcers, and 49.3% of gastric/duodenal erosions.

Significant endoscopic findings in dyspeptic patients are frequent in our data. A considerable number of gastric cancer were diagnosed in patients under 45 years of age. H. pylori is prevalent in our dyspepsia population. The age threshold of 40-45 years for both males and females could be reasonable for the use of endoscopy in patients with dyspepsia in our population.

There has been a paradoxical rise in young-onset gastric cancer (YOGC), defined as gastric cancer (GC) diagnosed before age 50. Precursor lesions may contribute to pathogenesis, though their role in progression to different histologic subtypes is unclear. The impact of self-reported race is also poorly characterized and may be unreliable as a proxy for genetic differences. We aimed to compare differences in histology and genetic ancestry between YOGC and average-onset gastric cancer (AOGC).

This retrospective cohort included all patients with GC at Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) from January 2013 to March 2021. Data on demographics, tumor characteristics, and precursor lesions were collected. Genetic ancestry was inferred from MSK-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets panel.

Of 1685 individuals with GC, 290 had YOGC. Compared to AOGC, individuals with YOGC tended to be female, Hispanic, foreign-born, and feature diffuse-type histology. YOGC was less likely to have precursor lesions, including intestinal metaplasia (20% vs. 37%, p < 0.01) and dysplasia (4% vs. 14%, p < 0.01). Of 560 patients with ancestry data, 127 had YOGC. Admixed, East Asian, and South Asian ancestries were more likely to present with YOGC while Europeans presented with AOGC. Intestinal metaplasia was enriched among East Asians, maintained when stratifying by histology and GC onset.

We observed YOGC was more common in East and South Asians, and while YOGC may be less likely to develop in the setting of precursor lesions these high-risk states may also be enriched in East Asians. Future research is needed to understand drivers behind such differences and outcome disparities given these individuals may be less amenable to endoscopic interventions.

Racial disparities in gastric cancer outcomes, including stage at diagnosis and overall survival, continue to affect Hispanic and non-Hispanic populations. This study aims to evaluate these disparities across different racial groups.

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using SEER data from 2018 to 2021, including 18,984 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer. Patients were selected based on ICD-O-3 codes for "stomach" with malignant behavior. Using ordered logistic regression, the association between race and stage at diagnosis was analyzed, while Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess OS and CSS.

Hispanic patients were significantly more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage compared to non-Hispanic patients (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.10-1.28). Both Hispanic and Black patients had worse OS compared to Non-Hispanic Whites (HR 1.10 CI 1.03-1.17, p = 0.003 and HR 1.13 CI 1.04-1.22, p = 0.002, respectively) as well as CSS.

Hispanic patients are more likely to be diagnosed with advanced-stage gastric cancer and have poorer survival outcomes compared to non-Hispanic Whites. These disparities may be linked to differences in healthcare access, insurance, language barriers, and preventive care utilization.

The incidence of early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC) is consistently increasing, and its etiology is notably complex. This increase may be attributed to distinctive factors that differ from those associated with late-onset gastric cancer (LOGC), including genetic predispositions, dietary factors, gastric microbiota dysbiosis, and screening of high-risk cases. These factors collectively contribute to the onset of cancer. EOGC significantly differs from LOGC in terms of clinicopathological and molecular characteristics. Moreover, multiple differences in prognosis and clinical management also exist. This study aimed to systematically review the latest research advancements in the epidemiological characteristics, etiological factors, clinicopathological and molecular features, prognosis, and treatment modalities of EOGC.

During the last few years, epidemiological data from many countries suggest that the incidence and prevalence of many cancers of the digestive system are shifting from the older to the younger ages, the so-called "early-onset cancer". This is particularly evident in colorectal cancer and secondarily in other malignant digestive neoplasms, mainly stomach and in a lesser degree pancreas, and biliary tract. It should be emphasized that data concerning digestive neoplasms, except for those referring to the colon and stomach, could be characterized as rather insufficient. The exact magnitude of the shift in younger ages is expected to become clearer shortly, as long as relevant epidemiological data from many parts of the world would be available. The most important question concerns the etiology of this phenomenon, since its magnitude cannot be explained solely by the better diagnostic methodology and the preventive programs applied in many countries. The existing data support the assumption that a number of environmental factors may play a primary role in influencing carcinogenesis, sometimes from childhood. Changes that have appeared in the last decades related mainly to eating habits, consistency of gut microbiome and an increase of obese people interacting with genetic factors, ultimately favor the process of carcinogenesis. Even these factors however, are not entirely sufficient to explain the age-related changes in the frequency of digestive neoplasms. Studies of the individual effect of each of the already known factors or factors likely to be involved in the etiology of this phenomenon and studies using state-of-the-art technologies to accurately determine the degree of the population exposure to these factors are required. In this article, we attempt to describe the epidemiological data supporting the age-shifting of digestive malignancies and their possible pathogenesis. Finally, we propose some measures regarding the attitude of the scientific community to this alarming phenomenon.

Incidence of young patients (aged 40 years or younger) diagnosed with gastric carcinoma has increased worldwide. Young GC diagnosis, have clinicopathological features that differ from elderly, and is correlated with bad prognosis factors. The purpose of this work is to describe the prevalence, clinic-pathological features, and prognosis of overall survival (OS) of young Latin-American patients with GC.

Retrospective, observational study. Included patients treated at the National Cancer Institute [2004-2020]. Statistical analysis: χ2 and t-test, Kaplan-Meier, Log-Rank and Cox-Regression. Statistical significance differences were assessed when P was bilaterally <0.05.

A total of 2,543 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Young-patients were predominantly female (54%), with diffuse-type adenocarcinoma (68%), signet-ring-cell (72%), poor-differentiation (90%), and metastatic (79%). In OS analysis, patients with metastatic disease, showed differences regarding age, young patients reported a median-OS of 8 versus 13 months for elderly patients (P=0.001). Among young patients, differences were also observed regarding gender, young-female patients had a median-OS of 5 versus 11 months for young-man (P=0.001).

This is one of the pioneer studies correlating age with gender and the prognostic features of bad prognosis in Latin-American population. Besides, supports the idea that a global effort is required to improve awareness, prevention, and early diagnosis of GC.

The impact of age on various aspects of gastric cancer (GC) remains controversial. Clarifying this issue can improve our understanding of the disease, refine risk stratification models, and aid in personalized therapeutic approaches. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of age at diagnosis on the clinicopathological features, prognosis, and management of a specific cohort of Spanish patients with resected GC. The study encompassed 315 patients treated at a single tertiary hospital in Spain, divided into two age-based subgroups: ≤65 years and >65 years. The mean and median ages at diagnosis were 72 and 76 years. Most tumors were diagnosed at pT3 stage (49.2%), and 59.6% of patients had lymph node metastases. 21.3% of cases were diagnosed with GC at age ≤ 65 years. Younger patients showed a significantly higher prevalence of flat, diffuse, high-grade tumors, signet-ring cells, perineural infiltration, D2 lymphadenectomies, and adjuvant therapy. They also exhibited a higher rate of recurrences, but had a significantly longer follow-up. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated no significant prognostic differences based on age. Finally, age did not independently predict overall survival or disease-free survival. Our results suggest that younger patients may require more aggressive treatment due to adverse clinicopathologic features, but the lack of prognostic differences among age groups in our cohort indicates the need for further investigation into the complex interplay between age, clinicopathologic factors, and long-term outcomes in GC.

With the development of 16S rRNA technology, gut microbiome evaluation has been performed in many diseases, including gastrointestinal tumors. Among these cancers, gastric cancer (GC) exhibits high morbidity and mortality and has been extensively studied in its pathogenesis and diagnosis techniques. The current researches have proved that the gut microbiome may have the potential to distinguish GC patients from healthy patients. However, the change of the gut microbiome according to tumor node metastasis classification (TNM) has not been clarified. Besides, the characteristics of gut microbiome in GC patients and their ages of onset are also ambiguous. To address the above shortcomings, we investigated 226 fecal samples and divided them according to their tumor stage and onset age. The findings revealed that surgery and tumor stage can change the characteristic of GC patients' gut microbiota. In specific, the effect of surgery on early gastric cancer (EGC) was greater than that on advanced gastric cancer (AGC), and the comparison of postoperative microflora with healthy people indicated that EGC has more differential bacteria than AGC. Besides, we found that Collinsella, Blautia, Anaerostipes, Dorea, and Lachnospiraceae_ND3007_group expressed differently between EGC and AGC. More importantly, it is the first time revealed that the composition of gut microbiota in GC is different between different onset ages. KEY POINTS: •Gut microbiota of gastric cancer (GC) patients are either highly associated with TNM stage and surgery or not. It shows surgery has more significant changes in early gastric cancer (EGC) than advanced gastric cancer (AGC). •There existed specific gut microbiota between EGC and AGC which may have potential to distinguish the early or advanced GC. •Onset age of GC may influence the gut microbiota: the composition of gut microbiota of early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC) and late-onset gastric cancer (LOGC) is significantly different.

Early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC, ≤45 years old) is characterized with increasing incidence and more malignant phenotypes compared with late-onset gastric cancer, which exhibits remarkable immune cell infiltration and is potential immunotherapeutic population. Till now, restricted survival information of EOGC is available due to limited case numbers. This study established a novel nomogram to help evaluate cancer-specific survival (CSS) of EOGC patients who underwent gastrectomy, and may provide evidence for predicting patients' survival.

We retrospectively enrolled a cohort containing 555 EOGC cases from five independent medical centers in China, among which 388 cases were randomly selected into a training set while the other 167 cases were assigned into the internal validation set. Asian or Pacific Islander (API) patients diagnosed with EOGC during 1975-2016 were retrieved from the SEER database (n=299) and utilized as the external validation cohort. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to test prognostic significances of clinicopathological factors in the training set. Accordingly, two survival nomogram models were established and compared by concordance index (C-index), calibration curve, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and decision curve analyses (DCA).

The 5-year CSS rate of training cohort was 61.3% with a median survival time as 97.2 months. High consistency was observed on calibration curves in all three cohorts. Preferred nomogram was selected due to its better performance on ROC and DCA results. Accordingly, a novel predicative risk model was introduced to better stratify high-risk EOGC patients with low-risk patients. In brief, the 5-year CSS rates for low-risk groups were 92.9% in training set, 83.1% in internal validation set, 89.9% in combined NQSQS cohort, and 85.3% in SEER-API cohort. In contrast, the 5-year CSS rates decreased to 38.5%, 44.3%, 40.5%, and 36.9% in the high-risk groups of the four cohorts above, respectively. The significant survival difference between high-risk group (HRG) and low-risk group (LRG) indicated the precise accuracy of our risk model. Furthermore, the risk model was validated in patients with different TNM stages, respectively. Finally, an EOGC web-based survival calculator was established with public access, which can help predict prognosis.

Our data provided a precise nomogram on predicting CSS of EOGC patients with potential clinical applicability.

Background: Early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC), or gastric cancer in patients younger than 45 years old, is poorly understood and relatively uncommon. Similar to other gastrointestinal malignancies, the incidence of EOGC is rising in Western countries. It is unclear which populations experience a disproportionate burden of EOGC and what factors influence how patients with EOGC are treated. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, population-based study of patients diagnosed with gastric cancer from 2004 to 2018 using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). In addition to identifying unique demographic characteristics of patients with EOGC, we evaluated (using multivariable logistic regression controlling for year of diagnoses, primary site, and stage) how gender/sex, race/ethnicity, treatment facility type, payor status, and location of residence influenced the receipt of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. Results: Compared to patients 45−70 and >70 years of age with gastric cancer, patients with EOGC were more likely to be female, Asian/Pacific Islander (PI), African American (AA), Hispanic, uninsured, and present with stage IV disease. On multivariable analysis, several differences among subsets of patients with EOGC were identified. Female patients with EOGC were less likely to receive surgery and chemotherapy than male patients with EOGC. Asian/Pacific Islander patients with EOGC were more likely to receive chemotherapy and less likely to receive radiation than Caucasian patients with EOGC. African American patients were more likely to receive chemotherapy than Caucasian patients with EOGC. Hispanic patients were more likely to receive surgery and chemotherapy and less likely to receive radiation than Caucasian patients with EOGC. Patients with EOGC treated at community cancer centers were more likely to receive surgery and less likely to receive chemotherapy than patients with EOGC treated at academic centers. Uninsured patients with EOGC were more likely to receive surgery and less likely to receive chemotherapy than privately insured patients with EOGC. Patients with EOGC living in locations not adjacent to metropolitan areas were less likely to receive surgery compared to patients with EOGC who resided in metropolitan areas, Conclusions: Patients with EOGC are a demographically distinct population. Treatment of these patients varies significantly based on several demographic factors. Additional analysis is needed to elucidate why particular groups are more affected by EOGC and how treatment decisions are made for, and by, these patients.

Aberrant expression of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) is associated with the progression of human cancers, including gastric cancer (GC). The function of lncRNA DLGAP1-AS2, as a promising oncogene, has been identified in several human cancers. Therefore, this study was aimed to explore the association of DLGAP1-AS2 with gastric tumorigenesis, as well.

The expression level of DLGAP1-AS2 was initially pre-evaluated in GC datasets from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Moreover, qRT-PCR experiment was performed on 25 GC and 25 adjacent normal tissue samples. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data were also analyzed for further validation. Consistent with data obtained from GEO datasets, qRT-PCR results revealed that DLGAP1-AS2 was significantly (p < 0.0032) upregulated in GC specimens compared to normal samples, which was additionally confirmed using TCGA analysis (p < 0.0001). DLGAP1-AS2 expression level was also correlated with age (p = 0.0008), lymphatic and vascular invasion (p = 0.0415) in internal samples as well as poor survival of GC patients (p = 0.00074) in GEO datasets. Also, Gene Ontology analysis illustrated that DLGAP1-AS2 may be involved in the cellular process, including hippo signaling, regulated by YAP1, as its valid downstream target, in GC samples. Moreover, ROC curve analysis showed the high accuracy of the DLGAP1-AS2 expression pattern as a diagnostic biomarker for GC.

Our findings indicated that DLGAP1-AS2 might display oncogenic properties through gastric tumorigenesis and could be suggested as a therapeutic, diagnostic, and prognostic target.