Digestive high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (HG-NEN) are rare and classified as neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) or neuroendocrine tumours G3 (NET G3), and differ in clinical and molecular characteristics, response to treatment and prognosis.

Prospective multicenter study registering clinical data on patients with digestive HG-NEN. Treatment outcome in patients with advanced disease was compared after centralized pathological re-evaluation.

427 NEC and 117 NET G3 received palliative chemotherapy. Immediate progression rate was 41% and 24%, progression-free survival (PFS) 3.4 m and 7.4 m, overall survival (OS) 7.4 m and 21.8 m for NEC and NET G3, respectively. Significant factors for OS in NEC were performance status (PS), Ki-67 > 55%, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), age, sex and for PFS colorectal primary and PS. NEC Ki-67 < 55% had similar OS comparing treatment. Significant factors for OS in NET G3 were platinum-based treatment, PS, age and ALP, and for PFS platinum-based treatment.

Survival was shorter than expected in this unique population-based cohort of advanced digestive HG-NEN, likely due to inclusion of elderly and patients with poor PS. Several novel prognostic factors were identified for NEC and NET G3. An initial sub-effective platinum-based treatment for NET G3 could not be compensated by later-line treatment.

Background/Objectives: Extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas (EP-NECs) are rare, aggressive malignancies with no standardized treatment approach. Although platinum-based chemotherapy is considered the first-line therapy, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) remain limited. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and pathological characteristics of EP-NEC patients, their treatment responses, and survival outcomes. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 29 EP-NEC patients diagnosed and followed between 2015 and 2024. Clinical and demographic data, tumor localization, disease stage, administered treatments, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess OS and PFS, with subgroup comparisons performed via the log-rank test. Results: The most common primary tumor sites were the pancreas (21%), prostate (17%), and cervix (14%). At diagnosis, 55.2% of patients had metastatic disease. First-line platinum-based chemotherapy achieved an objective response rate of 82.1%, with a median PFS of 8.16 months and a median OS of 14.16 months. Surgical intervention significantly improved survival (p = 0.020), while a high Ki-67 proliferation index (>80%) was associated with worse PFS (p = 0.032). Other factors, including smoking status and liver-directed therapies, had no significant impact on survival. Conclusions: EP-NECs present with a poor prognosis despite platinum-based chemotherapy achieving high response rates. Surgical resection improves survival outcomes, whereas high Ki-67 expression is associated with a worse prognosis. These findings highlight the need for further research into novel therapeutic strategies for EP-NECs.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are rare malignancies deriving from the endocrine system in the gastrointestinal tract including the pancreas. Prognosis is greatly heterogenous due to its dependency on various factors, most importantly stage and differentiation. Several studies report an alarming rise in incidence in the past decade. Despite there being some therapeutical options, best therapy sequence still needs to be defined, particularly for unresectable and/or intermediate and high-grade NENs. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) was approved in Europe and USA in 2017 and 2018, respectively. Studies with real-world systematic data on characteristics and treatment patterns of PRRT-receiving patients was non-existent at the time of this writing. In this retrospective study, we identified within the German NET-Registry 203 patients diagnosed with GEP-NEN having received PRRT from 1995 to 2023. We assessed general clinical patient characteristics, disease-specific characteristics, treatments and outcomes. To obtain a more up-to-date picture of treatment modalities and outcomes, a subgroup of the study population was allocated to the "therapy cohort," defined by patients with date of first diagnosis between 2010 and 2023 (open cohort). Mean age of the study population was 58 years (SD 12 years) with 51.7% being men. Most patients had a WHO performance score of 0 to 1 (41.4% and 50.5%, respectively). Most NEN cases were of small intestine/pancreatic origin (46.3% and 45.3%, respectively) and displayed well/moderate differentiation (55.3%). Ki-67 was generally within the 3% to 20% range (57.92%). Most patients presented with metastasis at diagnosis (73.9%). Somatostatin analogs (SSAs), chemotherapy and surgery were the most common non-PRRT therapy options (65.3%, 60.2%, and 50.0%, respectively). PRRT was most often applied as third- or second-line therapy (42.3% and 36.6%, respectively), usually after surgery and/or SSA treatment. As PRRT had been administered using different regimens, tumor response evaluation showed mixed responses. Given the low sample size and considerable amount of missing response data, no correlation analysis between PRRT sequencing and tumor response could be performed. Overall, the clinical characteristics and treatment patterns tend to follow trends observed in other studies or medical guidelines. Finally, this study presents real-world data that more accurately describes GEP-NEN disease in Germany and treatment modalities after PRRT's approval.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been primarily studied in low and intermediate-grade digestive neuroendocrine tumors (NET G1-G2). The documentation of a similar benefit for high-grade digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) has been limited. This review evaluates the use of PRRT for high-grade digestive NEN (well-differentiated NET G3 and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas [NEC]). We identified one phase III trial and seven retrospective studies reporting specifically on PRRT outcome of >10 digestive high-grade NEN patients. The retrospective single-arm studies indicate a benefit for PRRT in NET G3. The randomized phase III NETTER-2 trial demonstrates major PFS superiority of PRRT versus somatostatin analog therapy as the first-line treatment for the NET G3 subgroup. PRRT can now be considered a potential first-line treatment for somatostatin receptor-positive NET G3 patients, but whether it should be the first-line standard of care for all NET G3 patients is still not clarified. For NEC, scarce data are available, and pathologic distinction between NEC and NET G3 can be difficult when Ki-67 is below 55%. PRRT could be considered as a treatment for refractory NEC in very selected cases when there is a high uptake on somatostatin receptor imaging, Ki-67 is below 55%, and there is no rapid tumor progression.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an effective treatment for both oncological and hormone control and is a widely accepted standard of care treatment for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN). Its use is anticipated to increase significantly, and this demands accurate tools and paradigms to assess treatment response post PRRT. This article outlines the current role and future developments of anatomical, molecular imaging and biomarkers for response assessment to PRRT, highlighting the challenges and provides perspectives for the need to focus on a multimodality, multidisciplinary and individualised approach for patients with this complex heterogeneous disease.

Patients with metastatic high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) have an unfavorable prognosis. Treatment patterns and therapy outcome are scarcely evidenced, especially considering the WHO classification updates since 2017, and were thus investigated in this study.

This retrospective single-center analysis evaluated patients with neuroendocrine tumors grade 3 (NET G3) or neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) treated at the Medical University of Vienna since 2010. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) following first-line treatment.

A total of 80 patients were included, 53 (66%) had NEC and 27 (34%) NET G3. Thirty patients had pancreatic NEN (38%), 29 gastrointestinal NEN (36%), 20 an unknown primary (25%), and one gall bladder NEC. All patients had metastatic disease, and all but four received systemic therapy. Platinum/etoposide was the most frequent palliative first-line treatment in NEC (41/47, 87%) and capecitabine/temozolomide (CAPTEM) in NET G3 (14/27, 52%). Overall, the median PFS and OS from first line start were 16.1 and 43.9 months for NET G3 and 6.1 and 12.7 months for NEC, respectively. Median PFS for platin/etoposide in NEC was 6.1 months (overall response rate [ORR] 56%) and for CAPTEM in NET G3 16.9 months (ORR 46%). Irrespective of the limited sample size (n = 4-11), second-line median PFS was short in NEC (FOLFIRI 2.8, FOLFOX 2.6, CAPTEM 5.4, other 2.6 months) and longer in NET G3 (8.2-11.1 months).

The present data from a large European NET center show that multiple treatment strategies are used in NEN and highlight the varying outcomes between NET G3 and NEC.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and pancreas are heterogenous tumors. World Health Organization (WHO) 2019 classification introduced Grade (G)3 neuroendocrine tumor (NET) distinct from neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), based on molecular differences and to triage the patients for appropriate therapy. This distinction largely relies on morphology, which can be challenging at times. Genomic profiling has revealed TP53 and RB1 mutations in NECs, while death domain-associated protein 6 (DAXX) and alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation X-linked (ATRX), in G3NET. Their role as biological markers in differentiating these entities and their significance as prognostic markers are not yet established. This study aims at analyzing the diagnostic and prognostic role of p53 and ATRX in neuroendocrine neoplasms of GIT and pancreas.

A single-centre, eight-year retrospective study of neuroendocrine neoplasm of GIT and pancreas comprised G2NET, G3NET and NEC. Tumor slides were stained by immunohistochemistry for p53 and ATRX. Strong nuclear staining of > 50% of tumor cells for p53 was considered mutated. Nuclear staining of ATRX in < 5% of tumor cells was considered ATRX loss. Expression of p53 and ATRX was analyzed and correlated with tumor grades and patient survival.

Fifty-five patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm were studied, comprising G2NET (58%), G3NET (16%) and NEC (26%). Median age of diagnosis was 59 years with male predominance. The pancreas was the most common site followed by the small bowel. NEC showed lower survival compared to G3 and G2NET. Mutated p53 immunohistochemical expression was more frequent among NEC than G3NET. Patients with mutated p53 had significantly lower survival irrespective of the grade (p = 0.001). There was no association of ATRX loss with grade or survival.

G3NETs are genetically different from NECs. Use of immunohistochemistry for p53 in addition to histomorphology may facilitate accurate categorization of NEC and G3NET. Mutated p53 may also be used as an independent prognostic marker in neuroendocrine tumors of GIT and pancreas.

A 65-year-old male presented after a positive Cologuard testing. He was asymptomatic at presentation, with no reported complaints of fever, chills, abdominal pain, diarrhea, constipation, hematochezia, or unexpected weight loss. CT imaging of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a 2 cm mass at the rectosigmoid junction with a single enlarged lymph node nearby measuring 2.7 x 1.6 cm, raising suspicion for regional metastatic adenopathy. He underwent a colonoscopy, which confirmed a rectosigmoid mass. Biopsy results showed adenocarcinoma of the colon. Consequently, the patient was scheduled for a laparoscopic sigmoidectomy with low anterior resection. The pathology of the surgical specimen confirmed adenocarcinoma, moderately differentiated, associated with a component of poorly differentiated large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, with the neuroendocrine component best developed in the lymph node metastasis. Although the patient did not meet the standard criteria for mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) tumors, treatment was administered using chemotherapeutic agents typically reserved for MiNENs. He was treated with platinum-based doublet with good response and has been in remission for one and a half years. This report highlights the importance of flexible therapeutic approaches when pathology marginally deviates from the standard established criteria, illustrating that tailoring treatment to the specific pathology can provide considerable patient benefits.

Our understanding of the pathophysiology of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) remains incomplete, largely due to their historically underestimated incidence and the perception of these tumors as rare and slow-growing cancers. Additionally, conventional reliance on histological examination alone is gradually being supplemented by the exploration and introduction of molecular biomarkers, such as microRNAs (miRNAs). As miRNAs modulate the expression of multiple genes and pathways involved in the tumorigenesis of PanNETs, these biomarkers hold considerable promise for diagnosis and prognosis applications. In this study, we aimed to identify miRNAs as tissue markers associated with the diagnosis of PanNETs.

We conducted a case-control study including: 7 PanNETs and 19 nontumoral pancreatic tissues obtained from Romanian patients. The samples underwent miRNA profiling via quantitative RT-PCR to assess the expression of 84 miRNAs. Our results were compared with those obtained by reanalyzing a public dataset. Furthermore, we structured our miRNA expression data according to their targeted mRNAs and their roles in signaling pathways.

Fourteen miRNAs (miR-1, miR-133a-3p, miR-210-3p, miR-7-5p, miR-10a-5p, miR-92b-3p, miR-132-3p, miR-221-3p, miR-29b-3p, miR-107, miR-103a-3p, let-7b-5p, miR-148a-3p, and miR-202-3p) were identified as differentially expressed by comparing PanNETs with pancreatic nontumoral tissues, with six miRNAs (miR-7-5p, miR-92b-3p, miR-29b-3p, miR-107, miR-103a-3p, and miR-148a-3p) also found in the public dataset analyzed. Bioinformatic analysis revealed that the 14 identified miRNAs target 17 genes. Reanalyzing two public gene expression datasets, five of these genes have been found differentially expressed in PanNET compared to controls.

Our preliminary results, albeit limited by a small sample size, highlighted a specific miRNA expression pattern able to distinguish tumoral from normal pancreatic tissue. The diagnostic performance of these miRNAs, matching with circulating miRNAs and validated in more homogeneous and large cohorts, could represent a starting point for improving the diagnostic accuracy of PanNETs.

Neuroendocrine carcinomas are rare and aggressive malignancies, often diagnosed at advanced stages, leading to poor prognosis. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard first-line treatment for advanced neuroendocrine carcinomas; however after achieving response no consensus exists on maintenance therapies and the results are inconsistent. This review examines the role of maintenance therapy following response to first-line chemotherapy in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. We identified limited supporting evidence, primarily from phase II trials and case reports, that suggested maintenance therapy could be considered for prolonging progression-free survival, balancing toxicity, and maintaining quality of life. Nevertheless, prospective studies are needed to validate its clinical efficacy.

Evidence-based treatment decisions for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) require individualized patient-centered decision-making that accounts for patient and cancer characteristics.

To create an accessible guidance document to educate clinicians and patients on biomarkers informing prognosis and treatment in unresectable or metastatic GEP-NENs.

A multidisciplinary panel in-person workshop was convened to define methods. English language articles published from January 2016 to January 2023 in PubMed (MEDLINE) and relevant conference abstracts were reviewed to investigate prognostic and treatment-informing features in unresectable or metastatic GEP-NENs. Data from included studies were used to form evidence-based recommendations. Quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework. Consensus was reached via electronic survey following a modified Delphi method.

A total of 131 publications were identified, including 8 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, 6 randomized clinical trials, 29 prospective studies, and 88 retrospective cohort studies. After 2 rounds of surveys, 24 recommendations and 5 good clinical practice statements were developed, with full consensus among panelists. Recommendations focused on tumor and functional imaging characteristics, blood-based biomarkers, and carcinoid heart disease. A single strong recommendation was made for symptomatic carcinoid syndrome informing treatment in midgut neuroendocrine tumors. Conditional recommendations were made to use grade, morphology, primary site, and urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic levels to inform treatment. The guidance document was endorsed by the Commonwealth Neuroendocrine Tumour Collaboration and the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society.

The study results suggest that select factors have sufficient evidence to inform care in GEP-NENs, but the evidence for most biomarkers is weak. This article may help guide management and identify gaps for future research to advance personalized medicine and improve outcomes for patients with GEP-NENs.

This study aims to present the current landscape of immunotherapy in the management of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors and identify ongoing and future targets for improved response.

Somatostatin analogs and mTOR inhibitors remain cornerstones of non-surgical treatment, and applications of PRRT in SBNET are promising. Several efforts to replicate the success of immunotherapies in other solid tumors have been attempted in SBNET, with limited responses observed with current immune targets, such as PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4. Epigenetic analyses have suggested a potential role for methylation and histone acetylation in SBNET tumorigenesis that warrant greater exploration. While the incidence of SBNET continues to increase, the number of effective therapies is few. Further elucidation of targetable components of the SBNET immune microenvironment with greater modulatory effects is necessary to improve outcomes in this growing patient population.

This review examines the diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs), a heterogeneous group of tumors with expression of neuroendocrine markers. PanNENs include both well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) and poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (PanNECs). The diagnosis is confirmed through markers such as chromogranin A, synaptophysin, and INSM1, which establish neuroendocrine differentiation. The World Health Organization classification categorizes PanNENs based on tumor differentiation and proliferative activity (Ki-67 and/or mitotic index) into well-differentiated PanNETs (grade 1 to grade 3) and poorly differentiated PanNECs. In most cases, the morphology and proliferation index are sufficient to distinguish PanNETs from PanNECs. However, distinguishing grade 3 PanNETs from PanNECs can be challenging on the basis of morphology and proliferative activity alone. Additional key diagnostic markers for distinguishing grade 3 PanNET from PanNEC include SSTR2A expression and molecular immunohistochemical markers such as p53, Rb1, menin, ATRX, and DAXX. PanNECs are by definition high-grade tumors with highly aggressive clinical behavior, while PanNETs have a variable prognosis that is difficult to predict using current biomarkers such as tumor grade and size. Several studies have shown that ATRX or DAXX loss is strongly associated with a higher risk of PanNET metastasis and recurrence. They are therefore key prognostic markers in PanNETs. In addition, chromosomal copy number variations can further help assess PanNET aggressiveness and prognosis. Molecular profiling is increasingly important for improving the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of PanNENs.

Diagnosis and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-HG-NENs), particularly G3 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) relies on histopathological morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular biological markers, which are lacking especially in cases with ambiguous histomorphology. In this study to contribute to the development of more targeted treatment strategies, we examined various immunohistochemical and molecular biological markers and their association with clinicopathological features in GEP-HG-NENs.

We included 38 patients with GEP-HG-NENs in this study, with their retrospective follow-up data. The expression of tumour protein p53 (TP53), RB transcriptional corepressor 1 (RB1), somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2), clusterin (CLU), and marker of proliferation Ki-67 (MKI67) was immunohistochemically analysed. KRAS proto-oncogene, GTPase (KRAS) and B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) V600E expression was evaluated using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The relationships between immunohistochemical and molecular biological markers and clinicopathological characteristics were examined using a Cox risk regression model, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses.

SSTR2, RB, TP53, and CLU expression differed between NET G3 and NECs, with variations among the NET G3 and small- and large-cell NEC (SCNEC and LCNEC, respectively) groups (p < 0.05). The median MKI67 proliferative index was approximately 40% and 70% in G3 NETs and NECs, respectively. The NET G3 group exhibited a median survival of 25 months, indicating a relatively better prognosis than that of the NECs group (median survival, 11 months). Both Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the Cox risk regression model indicated a statistical correlation among treatment methods, CLU expression, and prognosis (p < 0.05). The BRAF V600E mutation rate was 32.4% in G3 NETs and SCNEC, demonstrating a significant difference between both types (p = 0.0086). Furthermore, ROC curve analysis highlighted the diagnostic significance of the positive expression of the immunohistochemical markers CLU, SSTR2, and RB in identifying NET G3.

To guide more suitable treatment strategies, it is essential to develop and apply valuable and more targeted immunohistochemical and molecular pathological markers for a comprehensive analysis.

Peritoneal metastasis in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors poses a significant clinical challenge, with limited data guiding management strategies. We review the existing literature on surgical and systemic treatment modalities for peritoneal metastasis from gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Surgical interventions, including cytoreductive surgery, have shown promise in improving symptom control and overall survival-particularly in cases in which 70% cytoreduction can be achieved. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy remains controversial due to a paucity of high-level evidence and a lack of consensus for routine use. The use of systemic therapy in the setting of peritoneal metastasis from gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is extrapolated from high-quality evidence for its use in the setting of the solid organ metastasis of this disease. The use of somatostatin analogs for symptom control and some antiproliferative effects is supported by large clinical trials. Additional strong evidence exists for the use of interferon-alpha, everolimus, and sunitinib, particularly in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Cytotoxic chemotherapy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy may be used in select cases, though as an emerging treatment modality, the optimal sequence of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy within the existing algorithms is unknown. Significant gaps in understanding and standardized management exist, particularly for those patients presenting with peritoneal metastasis, and targeted research to optimize outcomes in this population is needed.

Chemotherapy has limited efficacy in advanced digestive high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (HG-NEN) and prognosis is dismal. Predictive markers for palliative chemotherapy are lacking, and prognostic markers are limited.

Digestive HG-NEN patients (n = 229) were prospectively included 2013-2017. Pathological re-assessment revealed 188 neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) and 41 neuroendocrine tumours (NET G3). Tumour-DNA was sequenced across 360 cancer-related genes, assessing mutations (mut) and copy number alterations. We linked sequencing results to clinical information and explored potential markers for first-line chemotherapy efficacy and survival.

In NEC given cis/carboplatin and etoposide (PE), TP53mut predicted inferior response rate in multivariate analyses (p = 0.009) and no BRAFmut NEC showed response. In overall assessment of PE-treated NEC, no genetic alterations were prognostic for OS. For small-cell NEC, TP53mut were associated with longer OS (p = 0.011) and RB1 deletions predicted lack of immediate-progression (p = 0.003). In non-small cell NEC, APC mut were associated with immediate-progression and shorter PFS (p = 0.008/p = 0.004). For NET G3, ATRXmut, ARID1A- and ERS1 deletions were associated with shorter PFS.

Correlations between genetic alterations and response/immediate-progression to PE were frequent in NEC but affected PFS or OS only when subdividing for cell-type. The classification of digestive NEC into large- and small-cell seems therefore molecularly and clinically relevant.

Neuroendocrine Carcinomas (NECs) prognosis is poor.No standard second-line therapy is currently recognized after failure of platinum-based first-line treatment. FOLFIRI and CAPTEM regimens have shown promising activity in preliminary studies. We aimed to evaluate these regimens in metastatic NEC patients.

This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized non-comparative phase II trial to evaluate the activity and safety of FOLFIRI or CAPTEM in metastatic NEC patients. Primary endpoints were the 12 weeks-Disease Control Rate (12w-DCR) by investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1 and safety per CTCAE v5.0. Additional endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients' serum samples were subject to NGS miRNome profiling in comparison with healthy donors to reveal differentially expressed miRNAs as candidate circulating biomarkers.

The study was halted for futility at interim analysis, as the minimum 12w-DCR threshold of 10 out of 25 patients required for the first step was not reached. From 06/03/2017 to 18/01/2021, 53 out of 112 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 22.6 months (range: 1.4-60.4). The 12w-DCR was 39.1 % in the FOLFIRI arm and 28.0 % in the CAPTEM arm. In the FOLFIRI subgroup the 12-months OS rate was 28.4 % (95 % CI: 12.7-46.5) while in the CAPTEM subgroup it was 32.4 % (95 % CI: 14.9-51.3). The most common G3-G4 side effects were neutropenia (n = 5, 18.5 %) and anemia (n = 2, 7.4 %) for FOLFIRI and G3-G4 thrombocytopenia (n = 2, 8.0 %), G4 nausea/vomiting (n = 1, 4.0 %) for CAPTEM. Three microRNAs emerged as NEC independent predictors. High expression values were found to be significantly associated with decreased PFS and OS.

The safety profile of FOLFIRI and CAPTEM was manageable. FOLFIRI and CAPTEM chemotherapy showed comparable activity in the second-line setting after progression on etoposide/platinum.

NCT03387592.

High-grade gastro-entero-pancreatic neoplasms (HG GEP-NENs) can be stratified according to their morphology and Ki-67 values into three prognostic classes: neuroendocrine tumors grade 3 (NETs G3), neuroendocrine carcinomas with Ki-67 < 55% (NECs <55) and NECs with Ki-67 ≥ 55% (NECs ≥55).

We analyzed a cohort of 49 HG GEP-NENs by targeted Next-Generation Sequencing (TrueSight Oncology 500), RNA-seq, and immunohistochemistry for p53, Rb1, SSTR-2A, and PD-L1.

Frequent genomic alterations affected TP53 (26%), APC (20%), KRAS and MEN1 (both 11%) genes. NET G3 were enriched in MEN1 (p = 0.02) mutations, while both NECs groups were enriched in TP53 (p = 0.001), APC (p = 0.002) and KRAS (p = 0.02) mutations and tumors with TMB ≥ 10 muts/Mb (p = 0.01). No differentially expressed (DE) gene was found between NECs <55% and NECs ≥55%, while 1129 DE genes were identified between NET G3 and NECs. A slight enrichment of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in NECs and of cancer-associated fibroblasts and macrophages (M2-like) in NET G3. Multivariate analysis identified histologic type and Rb1 loss as independent prognostic factors for overall survival.

This study showed that GEP-NET G3 and GEP-NECs exhibit clear genomic and transcriptomic differences, differently from GEP-NECs <55% and GEP-NECs ≥55%, and provided molecular findings with prognostic and potentially predictive value.

Accurate grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) relies on the assessment of Ki-67 immunohistochemistry (IHC). While digital imaging analysis (DIA) has been employed for Ki-67 IHC assessment in surgical specimens, its applicability to cytologic specimens remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate an automated DIA for assessing Ki-67 IHC on PanNET cell blocks.

The study included 61 consecutive PanNETs and 5 pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. Ki-67 IHC slides from cell blocks were digitally scanned into whole slide images using Philips IntelliSite Scanners and analyzed in batches using the Visiopharm Ki-67 App in a digital workflow. Ki-67 scores obtained through DIA were compared to pathologists' manual scores.

The Pearson correlation coefficient of the percentage of Ki-67-stained nuclei between DIA reads and the originally reported reads was 0.9681. Concordance between DIA Ki-67 grades and pathologists' Ki-67 grades was observed in 92.4% (61/66) of cases with the calculated Cohen's Kappa coefficient of 0.862 (almost perfect agreement). Discordance between DIA and pathologists' consensus reads occurred in 5 PanNET cases which were upgraded from G1 to G2 by DIA due to contaminated Ki-67-stained inflammatory cells.

DIA demonstrated excellent concordance with pathologists' assessments, with only minor grading discrepancies. However, the essential role of pathologists in confirming results is emphasized to enhance overall accuracy.

In recent years, rapid advancement in gene/protein analysis technology has resulted in target molecule identification that may be useful in cancer treatment. Therefore, "Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition" was published in Japan in September 2021. These guidelines were established to align the clinical usefulness of external diagnostic products with the evaluation criteria of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. The guidelines were scoped for each tumor, and a clinical questionnaire was developed based on a serious clinical problem. This guideline was based on a careful review of the evidence obtained through a literature search, and recommendations were identified following the recommended grades of the Medical Information Network Distribution Services (Minds). Therefore, this guideline can be a tool for cancer treatment in clinical practice. We have already reported the review portion of "Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition" as Part 1. Here, we present the English version of each part of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition.

Significant improvement in molecular imaging and theranostics in the management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has been made in the last few decades. Somatostatin receptor-targeted PET imaging outperforms conventional, planar, and single-photon emission computed tomography imaging and is indicated in the evaluation of these patients when available, resulting in a significant impact on staging, treatment response assessment, and restaging of these patients. Radionuclide therapy can have an impact on patient outcome in metastatic disease when not many treatment options are available.

There are no therapeutic predictive biomarkers or representative preclinical models for high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN), a highly aggressive, fatal, and heterogeneous malignancy. We established patient-derived (PD) tumoroids from biobanked tissue samples of advanced high-grade GEP-NEN patients and applied this model for targeted rapid ex vivo pharmacotyping, next-generation sequencing, and perturbational profiling. We used tissue-matched PD tumoroids to profile individual patients, compared ex vivo drug response to patients' clinical response to chemotherapy, and investigated treatment-induced adaptive stress responses.PD tumoroids recapitulated biological key features of high-grade GEP-NEN and mimicked clinical response to cisplatin and temozolomide ex vivo. When we investigated treatment-induced adaptive stress responses in PD tumoroids in silico, we discovered and functionally validated Lysine demethylase 5 A and interferon-beta, which act synergistically in combination with cisplatin. Since ex vivo drug response in PD tumoroids matched clinical patient responses to standard-of-care chemotherapeutics for GEP-NEN, our rapid and functional precision oncology approach could expand personalized therapeutic options for patients with advanced high-grade GEP-NEN.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) represents a cornerstone of treatment regimens for patients with low proliferative neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, in patients experiencing somatostatin receptor-positive NET with higher proliferation rates, a value and potential therapeutic benefit of PRRT as part of multimodal treatment approaches and potentially with addition of radiosensitizing agents has not yet been established.

In this study, 20 patients with histologically confirmed gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NET with proliferation rates (Ki67) between 15% and 55% were treated either with PRRT only (n = 10) or with a combination therapy (n = 10) comprising PRRT and capecitabine/temozolomide (CAP/TEM) for at least 2 consecutive cycles.

Disease control rate in patients treated with PRRT alone was 60% (40% stable disease and 20% partial response). Strikingly, in patients treated with PRRT in combination with radiosensitization (CAP/TEM), the disease control rate was 90% (20% stable disease and 70% partial response). The median progression-free survival in the PRRT only group was 12 months, whereas the median progression-free survival in the PRRT + CAP/TEM group was 26 months and has not been yet reached for all patients in the group during the observation period. The median disease-specific survival for patients with PRRT alone was 51 months, whereas this end point was not yet reached in the PRRT + CAP/TEM group. Moreover, the PRRT + CAP/TEM group showed a significantly higher reduction of SSTR-PET-based metabolic tumor volume and chromogranin A levels compared with the PRRT only group. Importantly, adverse events of all grades did not differ between both groups.

PRRT + CAP/TEM represents a highly promising and well-tolerated therapeutic regimen for patients experiencing somatostatin receptor-positive NET with higher (Ki67 ≥ 15%) proliferation rate. Prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted.

Determining the most informative features for predicting the overall survival of patients diagnosed with high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms is crucial to improve individual treatment plans for patients, as well as the biological understanding of the disease. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the use of modern ensemble feature selection techniques for this purpose with respect to (a) quantitative performance measures such as predictive performance, (b) clinical interpretability, and (c) the effect of integrating prior expert knowledge.

The Repeated Elastic Net Technique for Feature Selection (RENT) and the User-Guided Bayesian Framework for Feature Selection (UBayFS) are recently developed ensemble feature selectors investigated in this work. Both allow the user to identify informative features in datasets with low sample sizes and focus on model interpretability. While RENT is purely data-driven, UBayFS can integrate expert knowledge a priori in the feature selection process. In this work, we compare both feature selectors on a dataset comprising 63 patients and 110 features from multiple sources, including baseline patient characteristics, baseline blood values, tumor histology, imaging, and treatment information.

Our experiments involve data-driven and expert-driven setups, as well as combinations of both. In a five-fold cross-validated experiment without expert knowledge, our results demonstrate that both feature selectors allow accurate predictions: A reduction from 110 to approximately 20 features (around 82%) delivers near-optimal predictive performances with minor variations according to the choice of the feature selector, the predictive model, and the fold. Thereafter, we use findings from clinical literature as a source of expert knowledge. In addition, expert knowledge has a stabilizing effect on the feature set (an increase in stability of approximately 40%), while the impact on predictive performance is limited.

The features WHO Performance Status, Albumin, Platelets, Ki-67, Tumor Morphology, Total MTV, Total TLG, and SUVmax are the most stable and predictive features in our study. Overall, this study demonstrated the practical value of feature selection in medical applications not only to improve quantitative performance but also to deliver potentially new insights to experts.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are a rare and heterogenous group of tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells in multiple organs. Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) G3 encompass a small subgroup accounting for less than 10% of all neuroendocrine neoplasms. In contrast to NET G1 and G2 as well as neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), in NET G3 data on treatment and patient outcomes are still limited. Especially in a metastasized tumor stage, the role of surgery, peptide receptor radionucleotide therapy (PRRT), and systemic chemotherapy is not clearly defined.

In this real-life cohort, we consecutively analyzed clinical outcome in NET G3 patients receiving different diagnostic and treatment.

We found that even metastasized NET G3 patients undergoing surgery, or receiving radiation, somatostatin analogues (SSA), and PRRT showed a clear survival benefit. Interestingly, all treatment regimen were superior to classical chemotherapeutic agents. In addition, somatostatin receptor (SSTR) PET-CT, FDG PET-CT, and repetitive biopsies were shown to be useful diagnostic and prognostic tools in NET G3. Our study demonstrates that patients with highly proliferative NET G3 might benefit from less aggressive treatment modalities commonly used in low proliferative NEN.

The optimal treatment for metastatic high-grade gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms when Ki-67 ≤55% is unknown. A prospective multi-centre phase 2 study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of everolimus and temozolomide as first-line treatment for these patients.

Patients received everolimus 10 mg daily continuously and temozolomide 150 mg/m2 for 7 days every 2 weeks. Endpoints included response, survival, safety and quality of life (QoL). Histopathological re-evaluation according to the 2019 WHO classification was performed.

For 37 eligible patients, the primary endpoint with 65% disease control rate (DCR) at 6 months (m) was reached. The response rate was 30%, the median progression-free survival (PFS) 10.2 months and the median overall survival (OS) 26.4 months. Considering 26 NET G3 patients, 6 months DCR was 77% vs. 22% among nine NEC patients (p = 0.006). PFS was superior for NET G3 vs. NEC (12.6 months vs. 3.4 months, Log-rank-test: p = 0.133, Breslow-test: p < 0.001). OS was significantly better for NET G3 (31.4 months vs. 7.8 months, p = 0.003). Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were reported in 43% and 38%. QoL remained stable during treatment.

Everolimus and temozolomide may be a treatment option for selected GEP-NET G3 patients including careful monitoring. Toxicity did not compromise QoL.

ClinicalTrials.gov (NTC02248012).

Surgery for metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (GEP-NEC) has not been well-studied. This retrospective cohort study describes patients in the United States with stage IV GEP-NEC and their survival outcomes segregated by surgery.

Patients diagnosed with stage IV GEP-NEC from 2004 to 2017 in the National Cancer Database were categorized into three groups: no surgery, primary site or metastatic site ("single-site") surgery, and primary site and metastatic site ("multisite") surgery. Factors associated with surgical treatment were identified, and risk-adjusted overall survival of each group was compared.

Of 4171 patients included, 958 (23.0%) underwent single-site surgery and 374 (9.0%) underwent multisite surgery. The strongest predictor of surgery was primary tumor type. Compared with no surgery, the risk-adjusted mortality reduction associated with single-site surgery ranged from 63% for small bowel (HR = 0.37, 0.23-0.58, p < 0.001) NEC to 30% for colon and appendix NEC (HR = 0.70, 0.61-0.80, p < 0.001), while the mortality reduction associated with multisite surgery ranged from 77% for pancreas NEC (HR = 0.23, 0.17-0.33, p < 0.001) to 48% for colon and appendix NEC (HR = 0.52, 0.44-0.63, p < 0.001).

We observed an association between extent of surgical intervention and overall survival for patients with stage IV GEP-NEC. Surgical resection should be further investigated as a treatment option for highly-selected patients with this aggressive disease.

Extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-NEC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy that can arise from any organ and frequently presents with distant metastases. Advanced disease has a poor prognosis with median overall survival (OS) rarely exceeding 1 year even with systemic therapy. The management paradigm of advanced/metastatic EP-NEC has been extrapolated from small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and commonly consists of 1st line therapy with etoposide and platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin), followed by alternative cytotoxic regimens at the time of progression. Only a minority of patients are able to receive 2nd line therapy, and cytotoxics derived from the SCLC paradigm such as topotecan or lurbinectedin have very limited activity. We aimed to evaluate emerging therapeutic options in the 2nd and later lines and survey potential future developments in this space.

After a long period of stagnation in treatment options and outcomes, more promising regimens are gradually being utilized in the 2nd line setting including systemic therapy combinations such as FOLFIRI, FOLFOX, modified FOLFIRINOX, CAPTEM, and, more recently, novel checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab and ipilimumab. Simultaneously, advances in the understanding of disease biology are helping to refine patient selection and identify commonalities between NEC and their sites of origin which may eventually lead to additional targeted therapy options. While many questions remain, contemporary developments give grounds for optimism that improved outcomes for EP-NEC will soon be within reach.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are relatively rare epithelial malignancies originating from pancreatic neuroendocrine cells, pathologically classified into well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) and poorly-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (pNECs). Although they also fall under the category of pNENs, the almost entirely distinct biological characteristics and survival prognosis have caused debate among surgeons when it comes to the development of surgical intervention options, particularly for locally advanced G3 pNETs and pNECs. We present a case of 66-year-old male with nonfunctional G3 pNET, invasion of five nearby pancreatic organs and type II liver metastases. The patient achieved good outcomes after undergoing multivisceral resection and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. This finding helps surgeons better understand locally advanced pNENs, formulate treatment decisions systematically and confidently, and balance patient benefits and risks of surgery.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), which are characterized by neuroendocrine differentiation, can arise in various organs. NENs have been divided into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) based on morphological differentiation, each of which has a distinct etiology, molecular profile, and clinicopathological features. While the majority of NECs originate in the pulmonary organs, extrapulmonary NECs occur most predominantly in the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) system. Although platinum-based chemotherapy is the main therapeutic option for recurrent or metastatic GEP-NEC patients, the clinical benefits are limited and associated with a poor prognosis, indicating the clinically urgent need for effective therapeutic agents. The clinical development of molecular-targeted therapies has been hampered due to the rarity of GEP-NECs and the paucity of knowledge on their biology. In this review, we summarize the biology, current treatments, and molecular profiles of GEP-NECs based on the findings of pivotal comprehensive molecular analyses; we also highlight potent therapeutic targets for future precision medicine based on the most recent results of clinical trials.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) represent a rare and heterogenous group of tumors with predominantly gastroenteropancreatic or pulmonary origin. Despite numerous diagnostic efforts, the primary tumor site remains unknown in up to 20% of the patients diagnosed with NEN. In this subgroup of NEN patients, a standard diagnostic algorithm has not yet been integrated into clinical routine. Of note, an undetermined primary tumor site in NENs is associated with an impaired clinical outcome by at least "formally" limiting treatment options exclusively approved for NENs of a certain histological origin. In this retrospective study, a patient cohort of 113 patients initially diagnosed with NEN of unknown primary (NEN-UP) was analyzed. In 13 patients (11.5%) a primary tumor site could be identified subsequently, amongst others, by performing somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-PET-based imaging, which was irrespective of the initial clinical or demographic features. Diagnostic work-up and therapeutic regimens did not differ significantly between patients with an identified or unidentified primary tumor site; only a detailed immunohistochemical assessment providing additional information on the tumor origin proved to be significantly associated with the detection of a primary tumor site. Our study revealed that a profound diagnostic work-up, particularly including SSTR-PET-based imaging, leads to additional treatment options, finally resulting in significantly improved clinical outcomes for patients with NEN-UPs.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) delivers targeted radiation to Somatostatin Receptor (SSR) expressing Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN). We sought to assess the predictive and prognostic implications of tumour dosimetry with respect to response by 68 Ga DOTATATE (GaTate) PET/CT molecular imaging tumour volume of SSR (MITVSSR) change and RECIST 1.1, and overall survival (OS).

Patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) NEN who received LuTate followed by quantitative SPECT/CT (Q-SPECT/CT) the next day (Jul 2010 to Jan 2019) were retrospectively reviewed. Single time-point (STP) lesional dosimetry was performed for each cycle using population-based pharmacokinetic modelling. MITVSSR and RECIST 1.1 were measured at 3-months post PRRT.

Median of 4 PRRT cycles were administered to 90 patients (range 2-5 cycles; mean 27.4 GBq cumulative activity; mean 7.6 GBq per cycle). 68% received at least one cycle with radiosensitising chemotherapy (RSC). RECIST 1.1 partial response was 24%, with 70% stable and 7% progressive disease. Cycle 1 radiation dose in measurable lesions was associated with local response (odds ratio 1.5 per 50 Gy [95% CI: 1.1-2.0], p = 0.002) when adjusted by tumour grade and RSC. Median change in MITVSSR was -63% (interquartile range -84 to -29), with no correlation with radiation dose to the most avid lesion on univariable or multivariant analyses (5.6 per 10 Gy [95% CI: -1.6, 12.8], p = 0.133). OS at 5-years was 68% (95% CI: 56-78%). Neither baseline MITVSSR (hazard ratio 1.1 [95% CI: 1.0, 1.2], p = 0.128) nor change in baseline MITVSSR (hazard ratio 1.0 [95% CI: 1.0, 1.1], p = 0.223) were associated with OS when adjusted by tumour grade and RSC but RSC was (95% CI: 0.2, 0.8, p = 0.012).

Radiation dose to tumour during PRRT was predictive of radiologic response but not survival. Survival outcomes may relate to other biological factors. There was no evidence that MITVSSR change was associated with OS, but a larger study is needed.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogenous group of tumors that are incurable when metastatic, regardless of grade. The aim of this article is to understand tumor heterogeneity and grade progression as possible contributors to drug resistance in gastroentropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Heterogeneity has been observed in the genetic, pathological, and imaging features of these tumors at baseline. Diagnostic challenges related to tumor sampling and the potential for changes in grade over time further confound our ability to optimize therapy for patients. A better understanding of NEN biology and tumor heterogeneity at baseline and over time could lead to the development of new therapeutic avenues.

High-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN G3) are rare and heterogeneous malignancies with poor prognosis. Aim of this study was to develop prognosticators identifying those patients that derive the most benefit from currently available systemic therapies.

This retrospective analysis included 78 patients with metastatic GEP-NEN G3. For patients with imaging data available (n = 52), the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). A Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the prognostic value of selected clinical and blood-based biomarkers. The impact of palliative chemotherapy regimens on time-to-treatment-failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) was assessed.

Median OS of the study cohort was 9.0 months (95% CI 7.0-11.1). The majority of patients received first-line treatment with platinum plus etoposide (83.3%). The ORR and DCR of the RECIST-evaluable subgroup were 34.6% and 76.9%. Median TTF upon first-line treatment was 4.9 months (95% CI 3.4-6.4). Multivariate analysis identified the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and absolute lymphocyte count as independent prognostic factors. A prognostic score based on these parameters discriminated patients with favorable and unfavorable outcomes.

Outcomes of patients with GEP-NEN G3 are still limited. A new prognostic score identifying those patients benefitting from current platinum/etoposide-based chemotherapy protocols may help as stratification factor in future trial design.