Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks among the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite progress in understanding its molecular intricacies, the management of CRC, especially in advanced stages, remains a significant clinical hurdle. This review delves into the evolving landscape of stem cell-based therapeutic strategies in CRC, with a specific focus on the interplay between cancer stem cells (CSCs) and CRC pathogenesis and treatment resistance. Highlighting the pivotal roles of CSCs in tumor initiation, progression, metastasis, and recurrence, the review comprehensively examines their involvement in CRC, ranging from normal colonic tissue to cancer initiation. The potential of stem cells for medicinal purposes in CRC management is explored, encompassing diverse modalities such as transplantation, differentiation therapy, immunotherapy, and gene/cell-based approaches. Challenges and opportunities associated with these strategies are also evaluated, providing insights into their clinical potential and limitations. The review also appraises preclinical investigations contributing to the understanding of CRC and stem cells. Current clinical trials, patient stratification strategies, and regulatory considerations related to stem cell-based therapies in CRC are scrutinized. Furthermore, the review explores emerging trends and future directions, including developments in stem cell technologies and ethical considerations. It highlights the transformative potential of stem cell-based therapeutic strategies in CRC.

Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) represents a first-line therapeutic standard for RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Despite this established approach, cetuximab β (CMAB009), as a modified antibody of cetuximab, prospectively selected for dual RAS/BRAF wild-type patients, has not yet been validated in the Chinese mCRC patients through phase 3 trial. In this study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03206151), patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC who were not suitable for radical resection were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive cetuximab β plus FOLFIRI or FOLFIRI alone. The primary endpoint was blinded independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), surgery rate for metastasis and R0 resection rate, and safety. From January 4, 2018 to September 2, 2021, a total of 505 eligible patients were enrolled and received study treatment; the median follow-up duration was 8.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.77 to 9.29) and 5.9 months (95% CI, 5.63 to 6.65) in cetuximab β plus FOLFIRI group and FOLFIRI group, respectively. Compared to FOLFIRI alone, cetuximab β plus FOLFIRI demonstrated statistically significant improvements in median PFS (13.1 vs. 9.6 months, hazard ratio [HR], 0.639; 95% CI, 0.468 to 0.872; P = 0.004), median OS (28.3 vs. 23.1 months, HR, 0.729; 95% CI, 0.551 to 0.965; P = 0.024), and ORR (69.1% vs. 42.3%, odds ratio, 3.090; 95% CI, 2.280 to 4.189; P < 0.001). Cetuximab β plus FOLFIRI exhibited manageable toxicity without novel safety signals. This study demonstrated that cetuximab β plus FOLFIRI provided significant clinical benefits as a first-line treatment for patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC. Compared to FOLFIRI alone, cetuximab β plus FOLFIRI therapy led to prolonged median PFS and OS while maintaining a manageable safety profile, offering a new treatment option for this patient population.

Aim: As intrinsic resistance - often driven by concurrent genomic alterations in tumor suppressor genes or oncogenes - remains a major challenge in oncology, this work aimed to comprehensively analyze BRAF somatic alterations across cancer types and identify new potential therapeutic strategies to overcome drug resistance. Methods: We conducted an extensive analysis of genomics, transcriptomics, and clinical data retrieved from public repositories, including cBioPortal. Our comprehensive analysis examined BRAF alterations [point mutations, structural variants (SVs) and copy number alteration] in more than 217,000 tumor samples across 120 distinct tumor types from primary and metastatic sites in both adult and pediatric cohorts, focusing on mutual exclusivity and co-occurrence of mutations in other oncogenes or tumor suppressors. The work also explores the association of BRAF somatic alterations with survival, clinical and molecular features. Results: Analysis of mutation frequencies across cancer types revealed that BRAFV600E represents approximately 90% of all BRAF alterations. While melanoma and thyroid carcinoma show the highest prevalence of BRAF mutations, followed by colorectal and non-small cell lung cancer in terms of absolute number of patients harboring BRAF mutations worldwide, notably high mutation frequencies were identified in rare malignancies, including hairy-cell leukemia, ganglioglioma, and serous borderline ovarian tumors. The comprehensive analysis of genomic profiling data across these tumors uncovered distinct patterns of co-occurring and mutually exclusive alterations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, illuminating resistance mechanisms and suggesting novel therapeutic combinations. Conclusion: Comprehensive genomic profiling is critical for optimizing targeted therapy and overcoming drug resistance in BRAF-mutated cancers. The identification of co-occurring alterations provides opportunities for rational combination therapies, emphasizing the importance of detailed mutation profiling in developing effective treatment strategies across diverse cancer types.

BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer correlates with poor prognosis and limited response to standard treatments. Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with BRAF/MEK inhibitors shows promise against BRAF-mutant melanoma in both preclinical and clinical trials. Therefore, we hypothesized that the treatment would be effective against BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer. In this study, we assessed the efficacy of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancers. We treated BRAF V600E colorectal cancer cells HT-29 and SNU-1235 with encorafenib (BRAF inhibitor) and binimetinib (MEK inhibitor) and assessed the degrees of MAPK inhibition, JAK/STAT inhibition, cell viability, apoptosis, and the expression of antigen presenting machinery. We also inoculated HT-29 cells into mice and treated them with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (durvalumab), encorafenib, and binimetinib for 4 weeks. We found that treatment with BRAF inhibitor, MEK inhibitor, or their combination led to significant tumor growth reduction, along with the MAPK and JAK/STAT pathway inhibition, antigen presenting machinery induction, and cytotoxic T cell activation. Our study demonstrates the potential effectiveness of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with BRAF or MEK inhibitors for BRAF-mutated colorectal cancers.

The treatment landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has undergone significant evolution, with the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy dramatically altering the management of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. However, the majority of patients, particularly those with microsatellite-stable (MSS) disease, remain refractory to immunotherapy, necessitating the exploration of alternative therapeutic strategies. This review summarizes the current treatment options for heavily pretreated mCRC patients who are not eligible for targeted therapies or clinical trials. Approved therapies for refractory mCRC, including regorafenib, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI), and fruquintinib, demonstrate modest survival benefits but are often associated with significant toxicities. Additionally, innovative approaches targeting specific mutations such as KRAS G12C, HER2 amplification, and BRAF V600E are discussed, highlighting emerging combination regimens with immune checkpoint inhibitors and other agents to overcome resistance mechanisms. The potential of rechallenge strategies using previously administered therapies, such as oxaliplatin and anti-EGFR agents, is examined, supported by retrospective and prospective studies. Furthermore, the role of older drugs like mitomycin C in combination with capecitabine is revisited, offering insights into their viability in advanced treatment settings. Ongoing clinical trials with novel agents and combinations are expected to provide further clarity on optimizing sequential treatment regimens and personalizing therapy for mCRC patients. This review emphasizes the need for comprehensive molecular profiling and shared decision-making to improve outcomes and quality of life in this challenging patient population.

The 2024 updates of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Clinical Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer emphasize standardizing cancer treatment in China, highlighting the latest advancements in evidence-based medicine, healthcare resource access, and precision medicine in oncology. These updates address disparities in epidemiological trends, clinicopathological characteristics, tumor biology, treatment approaches, and drug selection for colorectal cancer patients across diverse regions and backgrounds. Key revisions include adjustments to evidence levels for intensive treatment strategies, updates to regimens for deficient mismatch repair (dMMR)/ microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) patients, proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/ microsatellite stability (MSS) patients who have failed standard therapies, and rectal cancer patients with low recurrence risk. Additionally, recommendations for digital rectal examination and DNA polymerase epsilon (POLE)/ DNA polymerase delta 1 (POLD1) gene mutation testing have been strengthened. The 2024 CSCO Guidelines are based on both Chinese and international clinical research, as well as expert consensus, ensuring their relevance and applicability in clinical practice, while maintaining a commitment to scientific rigor, impartiality, and timely updates.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is ranked as the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, necessitating urgent advancements in therapeutic approaches. The emergence of groundbreaking therapies, including chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cell therapies, oncolytic viruses, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, marks a transformative era in oncology. These innovative modalities, tailored to individual genetic and molecular profiles, hold the promise of significantly enhancing patient outcomes. This comprehensive review explores the latest clinical trials and advancements, encompassing targeted molecular therapies, immunomodulatory agents, and cell-based therapies. By evaluating the strengths, limitations, and potential synergies of these approaches, this research aims to reshape the treatment landscape and improve clinical outcomes for CRC patients, offering new found hope for those who have exhausted conventional options. The culmination of this work is anticipated to pave the way for transformative clinical trials, ushering in a new era of personalized and effective CRC therapy.

Detection of the BRAF V600E mutation has important genetic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), identifying a subgroup of patients who derive modest benefit from standard treatments and have extremely poor prognosis. The evolution of molecular profiling and the implementation of next generation sequencing in the evaluation of a patient with BRAF-mutated mCRC has currently led to the discovery of actionable alterations. Targeting multiple pathways of resistance in BRAF-mutated mCRC may be the most efficacious route. Then, over a short period of time, the treatment landscape BRAF-mutated mCRC patients has shifted dramatically. Finally, novel treatment strategies are available. This review will discuss on currently approved treatments for BRAF V600E mutated mCRC and will try and portray the changing landscape in this setting in the era of targeted molecular therapy.

Encorafenib + cetuximab (EC) is approved for previously treated BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on the BEACON phase 3 study. Historically, first-line treatment of BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC with chemotherapy regimens has had limited efficacy. The phase 3 BREAKWATER study investigated EC+mFOLFOX6 versus standard of care (SOC) in patients with previously untreated BRAF V600E mCRC. The dual primary endpoint of progression-free survival is event driven; data were not mature at data cutoff. BREAKWATER met the other dual primary endpoint of objective response rate, demonstrating significant and clinically relevant improvement in objective response rate (EC+mFOLFOX6: 60.9%; SOC: 40.0%; odds ratio, 2.443; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.403-4.253; 99.8% CI: 1.019-5.855; one-sided P = 0.0008). Median duration of response was 13.9 versus 11.1 months. At this first interim analysis of overall survival, the hazard ratio was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.318-0.691; repeated CI: 0.166-1.322). Serious adverse event rates were 37.7% versus 34.6%. The safety profiles were consistent with those known for each agent. BREAKWATER demonstrated a significantly improved response rate that was durable for first-line EC+mFOLFOX6 versus SOC in patients with BRAF V600E mCRC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04607421 .

The burden of colorectal cancer (CRC) is high in the Asia-Pacific region, and several countries in this region have among the highest and/or fastest growing rates of CRC in the world. A significant proportion of patients will present with or develop metastatic CRC (mCRC), and BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC represents a particularly aggressive phenotype that is less responsive to standard chemotherapies. In light of recent therapeutic advances, an Asia-Pacific expert consensus panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC. The expert panel comprised nine medical oncologists from Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taiwan (the authors), who met to review current literature and develop eight consensus statements that describe the optimal management of BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC in the Asia-Pacific region. As agreed by the expert panel, the consensus statements recommend molecular testing at diagnosis to guide individualized treatment decisions, propose optimal treatment pathways according to microsatellite stability status, advocate for more frequent monitoring of BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC, and discuss local treatment strategies for oligometastatic disease. Together, these expert consensus statements are intended to optimize treatment and improve outcomes for patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC in the Asia-Pacific region.

Colorectal cancer is a common and fatal disease that affects many people globally. CRC is classified as the third most prevalent cancer among males and the second most frequent cancer among females worldwide. The purpose of this article is to examine how personalized medicine might be used to treat colorectal cancer. The classification of colorectal cancer based on molecular profiling, including the detection of significant gene mutations, genomic instability, and gene dysregulation, is the main topic of this discussion. Advanced technologies and biomarkers are among the detection methods that are explored, demonstrating their potential for early diagnosis and precise prognosis. In addition, the essay explores the world of treatment possibilities by providing light on FDA-approved personalized medicine solutions that provide individualized and precise interventions based on patient characteristics. This article assesses targeted treatments like cetuximab and nivolumab, looks at the therapeutic usefulness of biomarkers like microsatellite instability (MSI) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and investigates new approaches to combat resistance. Through this, our review provides a thorough overview of personalized medicine in the context of colorectal cancer, ultimately highlighting its potential to revolutionize the field and improve patient care.

BRAF mutation leads to constitutive activation of the MAPK pathway and is associated with the immune-activating molecular subtype of colorectal cancer. Targeted therapy for BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has significantly improved outcomes for these patients when combined with anti-epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy. However, most patients ultimately develop disease progression. We report a case of a patient with metastatic-deficient mismatch repair, BRAF V600E-mutated CRC, who achieved a durable complete response to vemurafenib plus cetuximab and chemotherapy despite initial high burden of disease, including peritoneal involvement. Recent clinical trials of combined anti-EGFR/anti-BRAF V600E therapy in BRAF V600E-mutant CRCs have found a few instances of robust response. Further study of combined targeted and chemotherapeutic regimens and the immunogenic properties of BRAF mutation may yield promising results.

Targeted therapy, the milestone in the development of human medicine, originated in 2004 when the FDA approved the first targeted agent bevacizumab for colorectal cancer treatment. This new development has resulted from drug developers moving beyond traditional chemotherapy, and several trials have popped up in the last two decades with an unprecedented speed. Specifically, EGF/EGFR, VEGF/VEGFR, HGF/c-MET, and Claudin 18.2 therapeutic targets have been developed in recent years. Some targets previously thought to be undruggable are now being newly explored, such as the RAS site. However, the efficacy of targeted therapy is extremely variable, especially with the emergence of new drugs and the innovative use of traditional targets for other tumors in recent years. Accordingly, this review provides an overview of the major signaling pathway mechanisms and recent advances in targeted therapy for gastrointestinal cancers, as well as future perspectives.

BRAF mutations occur in 5-10% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) cases, but their implications for prognosis and optimal treatment remain unclear.

This multicenter, prospective observational study analyzed 377 RAS wild-type cases from 511 patients across 32 centers, using PCR-based methods.

BRAF mutations were identified in 21% (79/377) of cases, predominantly V600E (89.9%) with a minority of non-V600E (10.1%). Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing revealed MSI-high in 11.3%, exclusively among V600E cases. V600E mutations were linked to right-sided tumors, poor differentiation, and elevated CA19-9 levels. Median survival was significantly lower in V600E cases compared to BRAF wild-type (12.4 vs. 37.5 months, HR 3.25, p < 0.001) and marginally lower non-V600E cases (12.4 vs. 34.7 months, HR 0.61, p = 0.057). Chemotherapy regimens (doublet vs. triplet) and targeted treatments (bevacizumab vs. anti-EGFR) showed no significant survival differences in V600E patients. Similarly, RAS/BRAF wild-type patients had comparable survival with bevacizumab versus anti-EGFR, even for left-sided tumors.

These findings highlight distinct clinical and prognostic profiles for BRAF V600E and non-V600E mutations, while treatment choice appears to have limited impact on survival in these subgroups or RAS/BRAF wild-type cases.

A prodrug is a molecule that lacks pharmacological activity, but upon enzymatic bioactivation, it can generate a therapeutically active molecule. The primary reason behind the design of a prodrug is to help circumvent challenges associated with the physicochemical properties of a drug molecule, such as solubility, absorption, distribution, and instability. Chemotherapy has been at the forefront of cancer treatment for over 70 years due to its ability to target rapidly proliferating tumor cells. However, a major concern with conventional chemotherapy is the lack of selectivity and its associated side toxicity, which can severely impact patients' quality of life. In oncology, prodrugs have been explored to enhance the bioavailability, improve efficacy, and minimize systemic toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents. Prodrugs activated by enzymes unique to a tumor microenvironment can significantly increase targeted delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs. This review aims to highlight commonly used chemotherapeutic prodrugs, including both alkylating and non-alkylating agents, and discuss their clinical relevance, mechanisms of bioactivation, and toxicity concerns.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent malignancy worldwide. Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) encompass a group of chronic intestinal inflammatory disorders, including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). As a chronic inflammatory bowel disease, UC may persist and elevate the risk of malignancy, thereby contributing to the development of colorectal cancer, known as colitis-associated colorectal cancer (CAC). Chronic intestinal inflammation is a significant risk factor for colorectal cancer, and the incidence of colitis-associated colorectal cancer continues to rise. Current studies indicate that therapeutic agents targeting inflammation and key molecules or signaling pathways involved in the inflammatory process may effectively prevent and treat CAC. Mechanistically, drugs with anti-inflammatory or modulatory effects on inflammation-related pathways may exert preventive or therapeutic roles in CAC through multiple molecules or signaling pathways implicated in tumor development. Moreover, the development or discovery of novel drugs with anti-inflammatory properties to prevent or delay CAC progression is becoming an emerging field in fighting against CRC. Therefore, this review aims to summarize drugs that prevent or delay CAC through modulating anti-inflammatory pathways. First, we categorize the published studies exploring the role of anti-inflammatory in CAC prevention. Second, we highlight the specific molecular mechanisms underlying the anti-inflammatory effect of the above-mentioned drugs. Finally, we discuss the potential and challenges associated with clinical application of these drugs. It is hoped that this review offers new insights for further drug development and mechanism exploration.

Patients affected by metastatic carcinoma of the colon/rectum (mCRC) harboring mutations in the BRAF gene (MBRAF) respond poorly to conventional therapy and have a prognosis worse than that of patients without mutations. Despite the promising outcomes of targeted therapy utilizing multi-targeted inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling system, the therapeutic efficacy, especially for the microsatellite stable/DNA proficient mismatch repair (MSS/PMMR) subtype, remains inadequate. Patients with MBRAF/mCRC and high microsatellite instability or DNA deficient mismatch repair (MSI-H/DMMR) exhibit a substantial tumor mutation burden, suggesting a high probability of response to immunotherapy. It is widely acknowledged that MSS/pMMR/mCRC is an immunologically "cold" malignancy that exhibits resistance to immunotherapy. The integration of targeted therapy and immunotherapy may enhance clinical outcomes in patients with MBRAF/mCRC. Efforts to enhance outcomes are exclusively focused on MSS/DMMR-BRAF mutant cancers, which constitute the largest proportion. This review evaluates the clinical efficacy and advancement of novel immune checkpoint blockade therapies for MSI-H/DMMR and MSS/PMMR BRAF mutant mCRC. We examine potential indicators in the tumor immune milieu for forecasting immunotherapeutic response in BRAF mutant mCRC.

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in Latin America (LA) with a projected 65.4% increase by 2040. Up to 10% of metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients in LA had an activating BRAF mutation. In clinical trials, targeted therapies for BRAF-V600E mutated mCRC have improved patient outcomes. However, in LA, BRAF-V600E testing and treatment of positive patients remains variable. To address this need, the Americas Health Foundation convened a meeting of LA experts on BRAF-V600E mCRC to develop treatment recommendations. The expert panel addressed the current landscape of BRAF-V600E mCRC testing, diagnosis and treatment in the region and identified significant limitations. Local guidelines, multidisciplinary boards, and tumor genotyping are among the recommendations. The panel also made first-line, second-line and surgery recommendations for patients after diagnosis.

Colorectal cancers (CRC) with BRAF V600E mutation exhibit limited chemotherapy response and a poor prognosis. Safety and efficacy of the VIC (Vemurafenib/Irinotecan/Cetuximab) regimen in the first-line setting for patients with BRAF V600E-mutated CRC remain undetermined.

In the prospective cohort study, the untreated, BRAF V600E-mutated, unresectable or metastatic CRC patients were enrolled. The VIC regimen and bevacizumab plus chemotherapy were compared in the first-line setting. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), conversion resection rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

In the intent-to-treat analysis, 38 patients received VIC regimen and 40 received bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. The ORR and DCR in the VIC group were significantly higher than in the bevacizumab-therapy group (ORR: 63.2% vs. 37.5%, P = .025; DCR: 94.7% vs. 75.0%, P = .019). The VIC regimen significantly outperformed bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in both PFS (11.9 vs. 7.7 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.30-0.87; P = .010) and OS (25.3 vs. 14.6 months; HR = 0.43, 95% CI, 0.22-0.82; P = .011). In the VIC group, the conversion resection rate for liver metastases was 34.8% (8 of 23 patients), and for unresectable local CRC it was 54.5% (6 of 11 patients). The adverse events rates of Grade 3 to 4 were 34.2% and 32.5% for the VIC regimen and bevacizumab plus chemotherapy respectively.

Among Asian patients with BRAF V600E-mutated CRC, the VIC regimen showed favorable outcomes compared to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in terms of tumor response and oncological survival, with a tolerable and manageable toxicity profile in the first-line setting.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) with BRAF V600E mutation presents a formidable scientific and clinical challenge due to its aggressive nature and poor response to standard therapeutic approaches. BRAF V600E mutation-induced conspicuous activation of the MAPK pathway contributes to the relentless tumor progression. Nevertheless, the efficacy of multi-targeted MAPK pathway inhibition remains suboptimal in clinical practice. Patients with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) have shown favorable results with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The combination of the MAPK pathway inhibition with ICIs has recently emerged as a promising regimen to improve clinical outcomes in the microsatellite stable (MSS) subgroup of BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic CRC patients. In this review, we elucidate the unique tumor biology of BRAF V600E-mutant CRC, with a particular focus on the immune features underlying the rationale for ICI treatments in the MSI-H and MSS subpopulations, then highlight the trends in clinical trials of the ICI therapy for BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic CRC.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant global health burden, necessitating a thorough understanding of prognostic and predictive factors to enhance patient outcomes. This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate prognostic and predictive determinants in CRC, encompassing both traditional and emerging biomarkers. A systematic search of major electronic databases was conducted to identify relevant studies published from 1995 up to 2024. Eligible articles were critically appraised, and data extraction was performed according to predefined criteria. The prognostic determinants examined included clinicopathological features such as tumor stage, grade, and lymph node involvement, as well as molecular biomarkers including RAS, BRAF, and MSI status. Predictive determinants encompassed biomarkers influencing response to targeted therapies and immunotherapy, such as HER2 and Immunoscore. The review also explores novel prognostic and predictive markers, including tumor microenvironment characteristics and liquid biopsy-based biomarkers. Synthesizing evidence from diverse studies, this review provides insights into the prognostic and predictive landscape of CRC, highlighting the potential clinical implications of identified determinants. Understanding the multifaceted nature of prognostic and predictive factors in CRC is imperative for the advancement of personalized treatment strategies and improvement of patient outcomes.

The BRAF gene is an important signaling molecule in human cells that is involved in the regulation of cell growth, differentiation, and survival. When the BRAF gene mutates, it can lead to abnormal activation of the signaling pathway, which promotes cell proliferation, inhibits cell apoptosis, and ultimately contributes to the occurrence and development of cancer. BRAF mutations are widely present in various cancers, including malignant melanoma, thyroid cancer, colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and hairy cell leukemia, among others. BRAF is an important target for the treatment of various solid tumors, and targeted combination therapies, represented by BRAF inhibitors, have become one of the main treatment modalities for a variety of BRAF-mutation-positive solid tumors. Dabrafenib plus trametinib, as the first tumor-agnostic therapy, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients aged 6 years and older harboring a BRAF V600E mutation with unresectable or metastatic solid tumors that have progressed following prior treatment and who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options. This is also the first time a BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination has been approved for use in pediatric patients. As research into the diagnosis and treatment of BRAF mutations advances, standardizing the detection of BRAF mutations and the clinical application of BRAF inhibitors becomes increasingly important. Therefore, we have established a universal and systematic strategy for diagnosing and treating solid tumors with BRAF mutations. In this expert consensus, we (1) summarize the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of BRAF mutations in different solid tumors, (2) provide recommendations for the selection of genetic testing methods and platforms, and (3) establish a universal strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with solid tumors harboring BRAF mutations.

Advances in precision oncology led to approval of tumour-agnostic molecularly guided treatment options (MGTOs). The minimum requirements for claiming tumour-agnostic potential remain elusive.

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Precision Medicine Working Group (PMWG) coordinated a project to optimise tumour-agnostic drug development. International experts examined and summarised the publicly available data used for regulatory assessment of the tumour-agnostic indications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and/or the European Medicines Agency as of December 2023. Different scenarios of minimum objective response rate (ORR), number of tumour types investigated, and number of evaluable patients per tumour type were assessed for developing a screening tool for tumour-agnostic potential. This tool was tested using the tumour-agnostic indications approved during the first half of 2024. A taxonomy for MGTOs and a framework for tumour-agnostic drug development were conceptualised.

Each tumour-agnostic indication had data establishing objective response in at least one out of five patients (ORR ≥ 20%) in two-thirds (≥4) of the investigated tumour types, with at least five evaluable patients in each tumour type. These minimum requirements were met by tested indications and may serve as a screening tool for tumour-agnostic potential, requiring further validation. We propose a conceptual taxonomy classifying MGTOs based on the therapeutic effect obtained by targeting a driver molecular aberration across tumours and its modulation by tumour-specific biology: tumour-agnostic, tumour-modulated, or tumour-restricted. The presence of biology-informed mechanistic rationale, early regulatory advice, and adequate trial design demonstrating signs of biology-driven tumour-agnostic activity, followed by confirmatory evidence, should be the principles for tumour-agnostic drug development.

The ESMO Tumour-Agnostic Classifier (ETAC) focuses on the interplay of targeted driver molecular aberration and tumour-specific biology modulating the therapeutic effect of MGTOs. We propose minimum requirements to screen for tumour-agnostic potential (ETAC-S) as part of tumour-agnostic drug development. Definition of ETAC cut-offs is warranted.

Distant metastases and drug resistance account for poor survival of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies such as gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, and colorectal cancer. GI cancers most commonly metastasize to the liver, which provides a unique immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment to support the development of a premetastatic niche for tumor cell colonization and metastatic outgrowth. Metastatic tumors often exhibit greater resistance to drugs than primary tumors, posing extra challenges in treatment. The liver metastases and drug resistance of GI cancers are regulated by complex, intertwined, and tumor-dependent cellular and molecular mechanisms that influence tumor cell behavior (e.g. epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, or EMT), tumor microenvironment (TME) (e.g. the extracellular matrix, cancer-associated fibroblasts, and tumor-infiltrating immune cells), tumor cell-TME interactions (e.g. through cytokines and exosomes), liver microenvironment (e.g. hepatic stellate cells and macrophages), and the route and mechanism of tumor cell dissemination (e.g. circulating tumor cells). This review provides an overview of recent advances in the research on cellular and molecular mechanisms that regulate liver metastases and drug resistance of GI cancers. We also discuss recent advances in the development of mechanism-based therapy for these GI cancers. Targeting these cellular and molecular mechanisms, either alone or in combination, may potentially provide novel approaches to treat metastatic GI malignancies.

PIK3CA gene encodes the p110α catalytic subunit of PI3K, which regulates the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. PIK3CA gene mutation is one of the most common mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC), affecting about 15%-20% of CRC patients. PIK3CA gene mutation leads to the persistent activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway, which promotes the proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and drug resistance of CRC. This article provides a summary of the key detection methods for PIK3CA gene mutation, and provides an introduction to the existing colorectal cancer treatments and their practical applications in the clinic. Besides, this article summarizes the role and mechanism of PIK3CA gene mutation in the occurrence and development of CRC. It also explores the relationship between PIK3CA gene mutation and the clinical features and prognosis of CRC. This article focuses on the influence and mechanism of PIK3CA gene mutation on the targeted therapy and immunotherapy of CRC, and discusses the potential value and future direction of PIK3CA gene mutation in the personalized therapy of CRC. We aim to provide new perspectives and ideas for the precise diagnosis and treatment of CRC.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the guideline endorsed first choice for patients with deficient mismatch repair or microsatellite instability high (dMMR/MSI-H) mCRC, however a significant proportion experience primary or secondary resistance. BRAF V600E mutated (BRAFm) and dMMR/MSI-H mCRC can be treated with BRAF + EGFR inhibitors but specific data on the efficacy after progression to ICIs are missing.

We collected consecutive patients with BRAFm dMMR/MSI-H mCRC treated from 2017 to 2024 with a combination of BRAFi+EGFRi+/-MEKi, after disease progression on ICIs. A control cohort of BRAFm pMMR/MSS mCRC patients treated with encorafenib+cetuximab+/-binimetinib from 2nd line was used.

dMMR/MSI-H (n = 50) BRAFm mCRC patients were more often > 70-year-old, with right-sided primary tumors, without liver but more lymphnode metastases than pMMR/MSS (n = 170). They were treated more frequently beyond 2nd line and 45 % were primary progressors to ICIs. Lower ORR (18 % versus 32 %, p = 0.09) and DCR (60 % versus 73 %, p = 0.11) was seen without reaching significance in dMMR/MSI-H as compared to pMMR/MSS patients. After a median follow-up of 14.04 months, no differences in PFS (median 5.13 versus 4.50 months, HR 0.83, 95 %CI: 0.57-1.20, p = 0.31) and OS (median 10.75 versus 9.11 months, HR 0.89, 95 %CI: 0.59-1.32, p = 0.55) were observed.

Our results show that BRAFm dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients benefit from BRAFi+EGFRi+/-MEKi after progression under ICIs. Despite lower ORR and DCR, the outcome is not different from that observed in pMMR/MSS BRAFm CRC and is in line with the results of the BEACON registration trial.