The esophageal mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) is an extremely rare but poor prognosis tumor.

This retrospective study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics of MiNEN and to investigate postoperative survival and prognostic factors.

This retrospective study analyzed 69 patients diagnosed with esophageal MiNEN at two major esophageal cancer centers in China from January 2000 to December 2021.

We assessed demographic data, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression models to evaluate prognostic factors.

The most common histological types were combinations of small-cell carcinoma and squamous carcinoma (91.3%). The correct diagnostic rate of preoperative pathologic biopsy was only 4.3%. The median overall survival (OS) was 24.0 months, and disease-free survival (DFS) was 16.6 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 84.1%, 34.8%, and 25.3%, respectively. A peak period of recurrence or metastasis occurs in the first year after surgery, and regional lymph node recurrence is the main route of postoperative recurrence or metastasis. Tumor size, T-stage, N-stage, and tumor, lymph node, metastasis (TNM) stage were significant prognostic factors. Subgroup analyses showed that in patients with limited-stage MiNEN in stages I-III, the postoperative adjuvant treatment modality failed to improve OS and DFS compared with surgery alone. Postoperative adjuvant therapy also failed to prolong OS and DFS in patients with lymph node-positive MiNEN. No significant survival benefits were observed with different surgical techniques or adjuvant chemotherapy regimens.

Esophageal MiNEN has aggressive behavior and a poor prognosis. In China, the pathologic type of esophageal MiNEN may be dominated by a combination of small-cell carcinoma and squamous carcinoma. Early-stage disease significantly correlated with improved survival outcomes. Current treatment protocols, similar to those for other esophageal cancers, show limited efficacy in improving patient survival.

Early adenocarcinoma mixed with a neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) component arising in the gastroesophageal junctional (GEJ) region is rare and even rarer in young patients. Here, we report such a case in a 29-year-old Chinese man.

This patient presented to our hospital with a 3-mo history of dysphagia and regurgitation. Upper endoscopy revealed an elevated nodule in the distal esophagus 1.6 cm above the GEJ line, without Barrett's esophagus or involvement of the gastric cardia. The nodule was completely resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Pathological examination confirmed diagnosis of intramucosal adenocarcinoma mixed with an NEC component, measuring 1.5 cm. Immunohistochemically, both adenocarcinoma and NEC components were positive for P53 with a Ki67 index of 90%; NEC was positive for synaptophysin and chromogranin. Next-generation sequencing of 196 genes demonstrated a novel germline mutation of the ERCC3 gene in the DNA repair pathway and a germline mutation of the RNF43 gene, a common gastric cancer driver gene, in addition to pathogenic somatic mutations in P53 and CHEK2 genes. The patient was alive without evidence of the disease 36 mo after ESD.

Early adenocarcinoma with an NEC component arising in the distal esophageal side of the GEJ region showed evidence of gastric origin.

Mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are epithelial neoplasms in which neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine discrete components are combined, each of which constitutes ≥ 30% of the neoplasm. The finding of an additional neuroendocrine component seems to characterize the tumor's biological behavior. Few studies have proved MiNENs histogenetic and molecular characterization, and the development of molecular markers for more accurate classification of MiNENs represents a clinical need. However, a common origin of the neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine components from a pluripotent cancer stem cell could be suggested. The optimal clinical management of MiNENS is largely unknown. Whenever feasible, curative-intent resection should be performed for localized disease; in advanced disease, the treatment should be targeted to the component responsible for the metastatic spreading. This paper provides a revision of the current knowledge on MiNENs, focusing on available evidence about their molecular characterization to suggest a prognostic stratification of these rare forms.

Adenocarcinoma (AC) with neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) or enteroblastic (ENT) differentiation rarely develops in Barrett's esophagus (BE). A 76-year-old man was diagnosed with Barrett's AC (cT1bN0M0) and underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy. A type 0-IIc + 0-Is lesion measuring 26 × 21 mm was macroscopically observed on a background of long segment BE (pT1bN0M0). The tumor comprised three different histological types of carcinoma (NEC, AC with ENT differentiation and moderately differentiated AC). NEC showed positivity for synaptophysin, chromogranin A and insulinoma-associated protein 1 with a Ki-67 index of 60.6%. ENT tumors were immunopositive for AFP and sal-like protein 4, and focally immunopositive for human chorionic gonadotrophin. The amounts of NEC, ENT and AC were 40%, 40% and 20%, respectively. p53 expression was positive throughout the tumor. Rb expression was negative at the NEC, but positive at the ENT and AC. CD4 and CD8 densities were lower in the NEC segment than in the AC and ENT segments, and PD-L1 expression was negative throughout the tumor. Early cancer arising in BE with a combination of tubular AC, ENT tumors and NEC is very rare. Our observations might contribute to understanding the carcinogenetic pathways and tumor microenvironment of NEC and ENT tumors.

Esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms are extremely rare, and their prognosis is poor. Mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) are even more rare and are defined as tumors consisting of neuroendocrine carcinoma and either adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma. We report a rare case featuring endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for an esophageal MiNEN, arising from the ectopic gastric mucosa in the lower thoracic esophagus. A 92-year-old male patient was referred to this hospital for investigation of an esophageal tumor. An endoscopic examination revealed a 10 mm elevated lesion, with 8 mm flat areas on the anal side, within the ectopic gastric mucosa located in the lower thoracic esophagus. ESD was carried out, and a histopathological examination revealed a tubular adenocarcinoma composed of differentiated neuroendocrine cells. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for synaptophysin and negative for chromogranin A. The labeling index of Ki-67 was more than 80%. Based on these results, we diagnosed the lesion as an esophageal MiNEN, arising in the ectopic gastric mucosa of the esophagus. The patient remains alive, without recurrence of cancer, 24 months after ESD.

Mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) of the digestive tract are a rare heterogeneous group of tumors that present many challenges in terms of diagnosis and treatment. Over the years, the diagnostic criteria, classification, and clinical behavior of these tumors have been the subjects of ongoing debate, and the various changes in their nomenclature have strengthened the challenges associated with MiNENs. This review is performed to provide an understanding of the key factors involved in the evolution of the designation of these tumors as MiNEN, highlight the current diagnostic criteria, summarize the latest data on pathogenesis and provide information on available treatments. Moreover, this work seeks to increase the awareness about these rare neoplasms by presenting the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors that play important roles in their behavior and discussing their different regions of origin in the gastrointestinal system (GIS). Currently, the MiNEN category also includes tumors in the GIS with a nonneuroendocrine component and epithelial tumors other than adenocarcinoma, depending on the organ of origin. Diagnosis is based on the presence of both morphological components in more than 30% of the tumor. However, this value needs to be reconfirmed with further studies and may be a limiting factor in the diagnosis of MiNEN by biopsy. Furthermore, available clinicopathological data suggest that the inclusion of amphicrine tumors in the definition of MiNEN is not supportive and warrants further investigation. The diagnosis of these tumors is not solely based on immunohistochemical findings. They are not hybrid tumors and both components can act independently; thus, careful grading of each component separately is required. In addition to parameters such as the metastatic state of the tumor at the time of diagnosis and the feasibility of surgical resection, the aggressive potential of both components has paramount importance in the choice of treatment. Regardless of the organ of origin within the GIS, almost MiNENs are tumors with poor prognosis and are frequently encountered in the elderly and men. They are most frequently reported in the colorectum, where data from molecular studies indicate a monoclonal origin; however, further studies are required to provide additional support for this origin.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) are uncommon and the classification of these tumors has been revised several times. Since 2016, at the Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark, all adenocarcinomas and poorly differentiated carcinomas of the EGJ have been stained routinely with the neuroendocrine markers, synaptophysin and chromogranin A, to detect a possible neuroendocrine component. This study aimed to determine if routine immunohistochemical staining is necessary to detect neuroendocrine differentiation of the EGJ tumors by evaluating how often a neuroendocrine component of the tumors was correctly identified or missed on routine hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides, and by evaluating the interobserver agreement among several pathologists. Of 262 cases a NEN was identified in 24 (9.2%). Up to 22.7% of all EGJ NENs would have been missed without routinely performed neuroendocrine staining in all EGJ tumors. The interobserver agreement between 3 pathologists was slight to moderate. In conclusion, immunohistochemical staining with neuroendocrine markers is essential for the diagnosis of NENs, and to detect all NENs, we recommend to perform this routinely on all resected tumors of the EGJ.

Mixed neuroendocrine - nonneuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) of the digestive system represent a challenge for both pathologists and clinicians. Their nomenclature has changed several times, and their diagnostic criteria, classification and clinical behaviour have been matter of debate over the years. Although several attempts have been made to elucidate the pathogenesis and biology of MiNENs, some issues remain open. This review will provide: a historical background that helps in understanding the evolution of the concept and nomenclature of mixed neoplasms; a revision of the knowledge on this topic, including molecular aspects, to give the reader a comprehensive and practical overview on this challenging field of pathology; a focus on the diagnostic criteria and on the determination of prognostic and predictive factors; and a description of the different tumour types in the different sites of origin.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus is rare and its developmental mechanisms remain unclear. Neuroendocrine carcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus with adenocarcinoma was detected at an early stage and resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Detailed pathological examination revealed that the neuroendocrine carcinoma originated via differentiation of the preexisting adenocarcinoma. A 79-year-old man presented with a flat protruding lesion in the esophagogastric junction. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed a red flat 10-mm protruding lesion in the Barrett's epithelium and a shallow depression at the distal end. Narrow band imaging with magnification showed that the blood vessels in the protrusion were dilated and meandered irregularly, while those in the depression were small and did not form a network; the blood vessels were missing in some parts of the depression. Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma was diagnosed after analysis of the biopsy specimen of the protrusion, and endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed. The pathological diagnosis was neuroendocrine carcinoma with an adenocarcinoma component.

Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) and mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract are both rare and malignant; however, it is unclear whether their prognosis is the same.

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 12,878 patients with NEC or MiNEN in the GI tract were reviewed retrospectively by searching the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database. Next, we compared the characteristics and survival between patients with NEC or MiNEN and further analyzed the prognostic factors for the patients.

The data showed that patients with MiNEN had a worse prognosis as compared with patients with pure NEC in the small intestine (SI) and appendix, whereas there was no significant survival difference between NEC and MiNEN in the other parts of the GI system. On the whole, age ⩾55 years (p < 0.0001), male (p = 0.002), being diagnosed at TNM Stage II-IV (p < 0.0001) or not receiving surgical treatment (p < 0.0001) were the independent negative prognostic factors for NEC patients, whereas age ⩾55 years (p = 0.003), being diagnosed at TNM Stage III-IV (p < 0.001) or not receiving surgical treatment (p < 0.001) were identified as the independent negative prognostic factors for the MiNEN patients. Furthermore, when NECs or MiNENs were classified based on the primary tumor site, the results showed that the prognostic factors for NEC and MiNEN varied between the tumor sites.

The prognostic differences between NECs and MiNENs in the GI tract are heterogeneous and site-related. Patients with appendiceal or SI MiNEN have a poorer prognosis than patients with pure appendiceal or SI NEC. Therefore, we should pay more attention to patients with MiNEN in the SI and appendix and monitor them more closely.