Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC) is a prevalent and aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis, underscoring the need for novel biomarkers and therapeutic strategies. This study investigates the role of C16orf74 as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in HNSC. Bioinformatics analyses revealed that C16orf74 is significantly overexpressed in HNSC and is associated with advanced disease stages, therapy resistance, and shorter overall and progression-free survival. A prognostic nomogram integrating C16orf74 expression with clinicopathological features demonstrated robust predictive performance. Functional enrichment and immune infiltration analyses suggest that high C16orf74 expression might contribute to an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment by reducing key immune cell populations, such as B cells, T cells, and natural killer cells, which are critical for anti-tumor immunity. Moreover, C16orf74 expression was inversely associated with immune checkpoint expression and immunotherapy response, highlighting its potential as a predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) efficacy. Drug sensitivity analyses identified potential therapeutic agents, including arsenic trioxide, carmustine, vincristine, quercetin, and carboplatin for patients with high C16orf74 expression. These findings highlight the potential of C16orf74 as a biomarker and therapeutic target to improve HNSC management.

Clinically, multimodal therapies are adopted worldwide for the management of cancer, which continues to be a leading cause of death. In recent years, immunotherapy has firmly established itself as a new paradigm in cancer care that activates the body's immune defense to cope with cancer. Immunotherapy has resulted in significant breakthroughs in the treatment of stubborn tumors, dramatically improving the clinical outcome of cancer patients. Multiple forms of cancer immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), adoptive cell therapy and cancer vaccines, have become widely available. However, the effectiveness of these immunotherapies is not much satisfying. Many cancer patients do not respond to immunotherapy, and disease recurrence appears to be unavoidable because of the rapidly evolving resistance. Moreover, immunotherapies can give rise to severe off-target immune-related adverse events. Strategies to remove these hindrances mainly focus on the development of combinatorial therapies or the exploitation of novel immunotherapeutic mediations. Nanomaterials carrying anticancer agents to the target site are considered as practical approaches for cancer treatment. Nanomedicine combined with immunotherapies offers the possibility to potentiate systemic antitumor immunity and to facilitate selective cytotoxicity against cancer cells in an effective and safe manner. A myriad of nano-enabled cancer immunotherapies are currently under clinical investigation. Owing to gaps between preclinical and clinical studies, nano-immunotherapy faces multiple challenges, including the biosafety of nanomaterials and clinical trial design. In this review, we provide an overview of cancer immunotherapy and summarize the evidence indicating how nanomedicine-based approaches increase the efficacy of immunotherapies. We also discuss the key challenges that have emerged in the era of nanotechnology-based cancer immunotherapy. Taken together, combination nano-immunotherapy is drawing increasing attention, and it is anticipated that the combined treatment will achieve the desired success in clinical cancer therapy.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and construct a prognostic model.

Clinical data were retrospectively collected from patients with locally advanced ESCC who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy. The primary endpoints were major pathologic remission rate and disease-free survival, and secondary endpoints were treatment-related adverse events and perioperative complications. Correlates affecting pathological response were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression, survival-related variables were screened by Boruta and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression analysis. A nomogram was constructed and utilized to test the predictive efficacy of the treatment with receiver operating characteristic curve and decision curve analysis.

A total of 181 patients were enrolled, of whom 119 (66 %) patients received 3-4 cycles of treatment. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 65.2 % of the patients, with 13.3 % experiencing severe complications. Major pathological remission rate was achieved in 68 (37.6 %) patients, with no significant difference between the treatment cycle groups (P=0.925). The nomogram included pathologic TNM stage, lymphovascular invasion, post-treatment and post-surgery albumin levels, and post-treatment systemic immune-inflammation index. One-year disease-free survival area under the curve was 0.86 (95 %CI, 0.75-0.97) in the derivation cohort and 0.75 (95 %CI, 0.50-0.99) in the validation cohort, with good calibration performance.

Pathological staging combined with albumin level and systemic immune-inflammation index could be a superior predictor of survival prognosis in ESCC patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. The findings of this study yield new evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in ESCC and provide a tool for identifying patients at risk of recurrence.

The study was conducted in order to investigate whether neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy can bring survival benefits to patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the real world.

We retrospectively analysed patients with locally advanced resectable ESCC who underwent surgery at the Jining First People's Hospital from April 2020 to April 2022. Based on their medical history, the enrolled patients were divided into a neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy plus surgery group (nICT group) and a surgery-only group (S group). Primary endpoints were the two-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates. Secondary endpoints were the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, and compared the surgery and postoperative outcomes between the two groups.

A total of 47 patients in the nICT group and 73 patients in the S group were included for further analysis, the stage of the nICT group was more advanced than that of the S group. In the group nICT, 8 patients (17%) achieved the complete pathological response (pCR), 29 patients (61.7%) achieved major pathological response (MPR), including 6 patients (12.8%) with a primary tumor achieving pCR but had residual tumor cells in the lymph nodes (pT0N+), and the treatment-related AES was manageable. The surgery and postoperative outcomes were comparable in both groups. The two-year OS and DFS rates for the nICT group were 91.5% and 85.5% respectively, while those for the S group were 71.2% and 68.5%, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test revealed significant differences in DFS and OS between the two groups. Patients who achieved MPR in the nICT group showed better DFS and OS, while the Three-cycle subgroup did not exhibit any survival benefit compared to the Two-cycle subgroup.

Neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with chemotherapy has promising efficacy and safety in the treatment of locally advanced resectable ESCC. The treatment modality has the potential to become a standard therapy for locally advanced resectable ESCC.

Esophageal cancer (EC) is identified as a predominant health threat worldwide, with its highest incidence and mortality rates reported in China. The complex molecular mechanisms underlying EC, coupled with the differential incidence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) across various regions, highlight the necessity for in-depth research targeting molecular pathogenesis and innovative treatment strategies. Despite recent progress in targeted therapy and immunotherapy, challenges such as drug resistance and the lack of effective biomarkers for patient selection persist, impeding the optimization of therapeutic outcomes. Our review delves into the molecular pathology of EC, emphasizing genetic and epigenetic alterations, aberrant signaling pathways, tumor microenvironment factors, and the mechanisms of metastasis and immune evasion. We further scrutinize the current landscape of targeted therapies, including the roles of EGFR, HER2, and VEGFR, alongside the transformative impact of ICIs. The discussion extends to evaluating combination therapies, spotlighting the synergy between targeted and immune-mediated treatments, and introduces the burgeoning domain of antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, and multitarget-directed ligands. This review lies in its holistic synthesis of EC's molecular underpinnings and therapeutic interventions, fused with an outlook on future directions including overcoming resistance mechanisms, biomarker discovery, and the potential of novel drug formulations.

There is currently no consensus on whether intensive cycles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy provide greater benefit than do less intensive cycles (two cycles) in esophageal cancer (EC). Therefore, in this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of three to four cycles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy compared to two cycles for treating patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

This is a retrospective study of patients enrolled on previous clinical studies involving locally/regionally advanced ESCC (St. II-IVA) who received preoperative immunochemotherapy at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from 2019 to 2021. In this study, patients were planned to receive 2-4 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy. In this secondary analysis, patients who received three to four cycles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy were compared to those receiving two cycles in terms of safety and oncologic outcomes. The follow-up duration required for inclusion was at least one year following surgery, or until the patient died or independently elected to cease treatment if less than one year.

Our study identified a total of 142 participants, who were categorized into two groups based on the number of neoadjuvant treatment cycles: the two cycles group (2 cycles) (n=65) and the three to four cycles group (3-4 cycles) (n=77). Regarding the rate of major pathologic response (MPR), the rates for the 3-4 cycles and 2 cycles groups were 22.1% and 20.0%, respectively, although this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.25). Similarly, the rate of pathologic complete remission (pCR) was higher in the 3-4 cycles group at 14.3% compared to 7.7% in the 2 cycles group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.07). However, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) classified as grade 3 or 4 was significantly higher in the 3-4 cycles group than in the 2 cycles group (36.4% vs. 18.5%; P=0.02). The median disease-free survival (DFS) for the 3-4 cycles group was 30.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI): not reached to not reached] and was not reached in the 2 cycles group (hazard ratio 2.35, 95% CI: 1.134-4.86; P=0.02). The 2 cycles group did not reach the median overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio 2.47, 95% CI: 1.08-5.53; P=0.045), with that in the 3-4 cycles group 34.9 months (95% CI: 24.5 to not reached). Interestingly, the survival outcomes were more favorable in the 2 cycles group for certain subgroups of patients: those who were male, those with a history of smoking, those with a history of drinking, and those who did not achieve MPR.

Two cycles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy can be considered in locally advanced ESCC at high risk of developing toxicity with 3-4 cycles with similar oncologic outcomes.

To analyze the clinical effectiveness and safety of Camrelizumab immunotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma (aEC).

A retrospective study was conducted on 142 aEC cases admitted between May 2020 to October 2022. The patients who received albumin-bound paclitaxel (ALB-bound PTX) and cis-platinum (DDP) were grouped into the control group (n=72), and the others received Camrelizumab immunotherapy in combination with ALB-bound PTX and DDP were grouped in to the research group (n=72). The clinical effectiveness, side effects (rash, nausea/vomiting, impaired liver function, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and alopecia), tumor marker levels (CEA, CA199, and CA125), immunoglobulin levels (IGA, IGM, and IGG), immune molecule levels (PD-1 and PD-L1), and the one-year survival rate were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, the risk factors affecting therapeutic effectiveness were identified by binary Logistic regression analysis.

Compared to the control group, the research group demonstrated a higher overall response rate, fewer side effects, and greater reductions in the levels of CEA, CA199, and CA125 after treatment. IgA, IgM, and IgG levels increased significantly in both groups after treatment, with a more pronounced improvement in the research group. PD-1 and PD-L1 levels decreased significantly after treatment, especially in the research group. The one-year survival rate was higher in the research group. Furthermore, treatment modality was a risk factor affecting therapeutic effectiveness in aEC patients.

Camrelizumab immunotherapy is highly effective in treating aEC. It can increase the one-year survival rate, and elevate the levels of immunoglobulins and immune molecules while reducing the levels of tumor markers and incidence of side effects.

Immunochemotherapy involving the combination of programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors with chemotherapy has advanced the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The use of corticosteroids as pretreatment might reduce immunotherapy efficacy.

To investigate the impact of baseline corticosteroid use on neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nIC) outcomes in locally advanced ESCC patients.

Patients with locally advanced ESCC who received nIC at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were included. Patients were divided into dexamethasone and antihistamine groups on the basis of the administered pretreatment. Antiallergic efficacy and safety were evaluated, as well as its impact on short-term efficacy [complete pathological response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR)] and long-term efficacy [overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS)] of nIC.

From September 2019 to September 2023, 142 patients were analyzed. No severe treatment-related adverse events or deaths were observed. Allergy occurrence was greater in the antihistamine group (P = 0.014). Short-term efficacy was not significantly different: The pCR rates were 29.9% and 40.0%, and the MPR rates were 57.9% and 65.7% in the dexamethasone and antihistamine groups, respectively. The long-term efficacy was not significantly different: The 2 years OS rates were 95.2% and 93.5%, and the 2 years PFS rates were 90.3% and 87.8%. Subgroup analysis revealed no difference in OS between the 20 mg dexamethasone group and the < 20 mg dexamethasone group, but PFS was significantly greater in the 20 mg dexamethasone group (93.9% vs 56.4%, P = 0.001).

Dexamethasone or antihistamines can be used before nIC in locally advanced ESCC without affecting short- or long-term efficacy. Administering 20 mg dexamethasone before nIC may improve PFS in ESCC.

CD8+ T cells are the key effector cells in the anti-tumor immune response. The mechanism underlying the infiltration of CD8+ T cells in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has not been clearly elucidated.

Fresh ESCC tissues were collected and grouped according to the infiltration density of CD8+ T cells. After the transcriptome sequencing on these samples and the combined analyses with The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) ESCC data, a secreted protein DEFB1 was selected to explore its potential role in the infiltration of CD8+ T cells. Bioinformatics analyses, histological verification and in vitro experiments were then performed.

DEFB1 was highly expressed in ESCC, and the high expression of DEFB1 was an independent risk factor for overall survival. Since the up-regulation or down-regulation of DEFB1 did not affect the proliferation, migration and apoptosis of ESCC cells, we speculated that the oncogenic effect of DEFB1 was achieved by regulating microenvironmental characteristics. Bioinformatics analyses suggested that DEFB1 might play a major role in the inflammatory response and anti-tumor immune response, and correlate to the infiltration of immature dendritic cell (imDC) in ESCC. Histological analyses further confirmed that there were less CD8+ T cells infiltrated, less CD83+ mature DC (mDC) infiltrated and more CD1a+ imDC infiltrated in those ESCC samples with high expression of DEFB1. After the treatment with recombinant DEFB1 protein, the maturation of DC was hindered significantly, followed by the impairment of the killing effects of T cells in both 2D and 3D culture in vitro.

Tumor-derived DEFB1 can inhibit the maturation of DC and weaken the function of CD8+ T cells, accounting for the immune tolerance in ESCC. The role of DEFB1 in ESCC deserves further exploration.

The time interval between neoadjuvant immunotherapy and surgery is 6 weeks for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but whether delayed surgery affects prognosis remains unclear.

Clinical data of locally advanced ESCC who underwent neoadjuvant immunotherapy followed by esophagectomy from November 2019 to December 2022 were collected. The surgery outcomes and prognosis were compared between short-interval (time to surgery ≤ 6 weeks) and long-interval groups (time to surgery > 6 weeks).

152 patients were enrolled totally, with a ratio of 91:61 between short-interval and long-interval groups. The rate of pathological complete response in the short-interval and long-interval groups were 34.1% and 24.6% (P = 0.257). Delayed surgery did not have a significantly impact on the number of lymph node dissections (P = 0.133), operative duration (P = 0.689), blood loss (P = 0.837), hospitalization duration (P = 0.293), chest drainage duration (P = 0.886) and postoperative complications (P > 0.050). The 3-year Overall survival (OS) rates were 85.10% in the short-interval group, and 82.07% in the long-interval group (P = 0.435). The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 83.41% and 70.86% in the two groups (P = 0.037). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with a favorable response to immunotherapy (tumor regression grade 0) exhibited inferior 3-year OS (long-interval vs. short-interval: 51.85% vs. 91.08%, P = 0.035) and DFS (long-interval vs. short-interval: 47.40% vs. 91.08%, P = 0.014) in the long-interval group.

Delayed surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy does not further improve pathological response; instead, it resulted in a poorer DFS. Especially for patients with a favorable response to immunotherapy, delayed surgery increases the risk of mortality and recurrence.

The current standard of care for locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers includes neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy with surgical resection; however, disease-free survival in these patients remains poor. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved for adjuvant treatment of locally advanced esophageal and GEJ cancers, but their benefit in the perioperative and neoadjuvant settings remains under investigation.

We used the PubMed online database to conduct a literature search to identify studies that investigated immunotherapy for locally advanced esophageal and GEJ carcinoma. A review of ClinicalTrials.gov yielded a list of ongoing trials.

Adjuvant nivolumab for residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery is the only approved immunotherapy regimen for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Early-phase trials investigating the addition of neoadjuvant or perioperative ICIs to standard-of-care multimodality approaches have observed pathologic complete response rates as high as 60%. Response rates are highest for ICIs plus chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and dual checkpoint inhibition in mismatch repair-deficient adenocarcinomas. Safety profiles are acceptable, with a pooled adverse event rate of 27%. Surgical morbidity and mortality with immunotherapy are similar to historical controls with no immunotherapy, and R0 resection rates are high. When reported, disease-free survival among patients treated with perioperative immunotherapy is promising.

Outside of clinical trials, immunotherapy for resectable esophageal carcinoma is limited to the adjuvant setting. Phase III trials investigating neoadjuvant and perioperative immunotherapy are now underway and will provide much-needed data on survival that may ultimately lead to practice-changing recommendations.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has dramatically improved patient prognosis, and thereby transformed the treatment in various cancer types including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the past decade. Monoclonal antibodies that selectively inhibit programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) activity has now become standard of care in the treatment of ESCC in metastatic settings, and has a high expectation to provide clinical benefit during perioperative period. Further, anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibody has also been approved in the treatment of recurrent/metastatic ESCC in combination with anti-PD-1 antibody. Well understanding of the existing evidence of immune-based treatments for ESCC, as well as recent clinical trials on various combinations with chemotherapy for different clinical settings including neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic diseases, may provide future prospects of ESCC treatment for better patient outcomes.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (nCT + ICIs) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy (nCRT + ICIs) both induced favorable pathological response and tolerant toxicities for locally resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, few studies compared safety and efficacy between the two treatment strategies.

This retrospective study collected clinical data of locally resectable ESCC patients who underwent nCT + ICIs or nCRT + ICIs followed by esophagectomy from November 2019 to December 2022. The incidence of adverse events, surgical outcomes, short and long-term efficacy, and treatment costs were compared.

A total of 206 patients were included, with a ratio of 158:48 between nCT + ICIs group and nCRT + ICIs group. The two groups exhibited well-balanced baseline characteristics. Most adverse events were grade 1-2 in both groups. The nCT + ICIs group had a longer operative time (334.00 ± 170.2 min vs 279.60 ± 88.31 min, P=0.020) than nCRT + ICIs group, but there were no differences in surgical complications. Although nCT + ICIs group had a lower pCR rate (32.3% vs 52.1%, P=0.004), the 2-year overall survival (84.42% vs 81.70%, P=0.860), 2-year disease-free survival (83.21% vs 80.47%, P=0.839), and recurrence patterns were similar to nCRT + ICIs group. In addition, nCT + ICIs group had significantly lower expenses (188796.00 ± 107704.00 RMB vs 231808.00 ± 48067.00 RMB, P=0.045).

Overall, nCT + ICIs have comparable safety and efficacy compared to nCRT + ICIs for locally resectable ESCC, but with lower hospitalization costs.

The 2023 Korean Thyroid Association (KTA) Management Guideline for Patients with Thyroid Nodules constitute an update of the 2016 KTA guideline for thyroid nodules and cancers that focuses specifically on nodules. The 2023 guideline aim to offer updated guidance based on new evidence that reflects the changes in clinical practice since the 2016 KTA guideline. To update the 2023 guideline, a comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2022 to May 2022. The literature search included studies, reviews, and other evidence involving human subjects that were published in English in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, and other relevant databases. Additional significant clinical trials and research studies published up to April 2023 were also reviewed. The limitations of the current evidence are discussed, and suggestions for areas in need of further research are identified. The purpose of this review is to provide a summary of the 2023 KTA guideline for the management of thyroid nodules released in May 2023 and to give a balanced insight with comparison of recent guidelines from other societies.