The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has grown significantly. However, the therapeutic benefits of ICIs alone are notably modest. This meta-analysis assesses the efficacy and safety of using PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in conjunction with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for patients with advanced or unresectable HCC.

An extensive search of the literature was performed using databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, capturing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until 16 October 2024. Efficacy was measured by progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Safety was gauged through the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS, along with risk ratios (RRs) for ORR, DCR, and TRAEs, were calculated, each with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity among studies was quantified using Cochran's Q test, I2 statistics, and 95% prediction intervals (PIs).

This analysis incorporated 4 studies with a total of 2,174 patients. Treatment regimens combining PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with TKIs significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.694, 95% CI: 0.527-0.914; 95% PI: 0.228-2.114) and ORR (RR = 2.303, 95% CI: 1.360-3.902; 95% PI: 0.408-12.991) compared with first-line monotherapy or TKI monotherapy in the overall population. Subgroup analysis indicated that the improvements in PFS and OS were particularly significant among patients of Asian descent or those with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (all p < 0.05). While the occurrence of any grade TRAEs did not differ significantly between the two groups (RR = 1.016, 95% CI: 0.996-1.036; 95% PI: 0.941-1.097), the incidence of serious (RR = 2.068, 95% CI: 1.328-3.222; 95% PI: 0.487-8.776) and grade ≥3 TRAEs (RR = 1.287, 95% CI: 1.020-1.624; 95% PI: 0.574-2.883) increased in patients treated with the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and TKIs.

This study revealed that combining PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with TKIs in the treatment of advanced or unresectable HCC leads to superior clinical outcomes compared to first-line monotherapy or TKIs alone, particularly in patients with HBV infection and those of Asian descent. Clinicians are advised to be vigilant regarding the potential for TRAEs in clinical settings.

Background/Objectives: Sorafenib and lenvatinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors used in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. This study investigates how hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection affects their efficacy in HepG2 hepatoma cells. Methods: HepG2 and HBV-infected HepG2/2215 cells were treated with varying concentrations of both drugs. The cell viability, cell cycle gene expression, cycle progression, and phosphorylation levels of ERK and AKT were analyzed. Results: The HBV-infected cells showed significant alterations in their cell cycle gene expressions, with an 80-fold increase in CCND2 expression and a higher proportion of cells in the G2/M phase, indicating enhanced proliferation. While both drugs decreased HepG2 cell viability in a concentration-dependent manner, HBV infection conferred resistance, as evidenced by the increased viable cells in the HepG2/2215 cultures. Sorafenib and lenvatinib decreased key cyclin and cyclin-dependent kinase expressions in uninfected cells, with less effect on the HBV-infected cells. Both drugs lowered the pERK and pAKT levels in the HepG2 cells. In the HBV-infected cells, sorafenib reduced the pERK and pAKT levels to a lesser extent. However, treatment with lenvatinib elevated the levels of pERK and pAKT. Conclusions: In conclusion, HBV infection increases resistance to both sorafenib and lenvatinib in hepatoma cells by influencing the cell cycle regulatory genes and critical signaling pathways. However, the resistance mechanisms likely differ between the two medications.

Liver cancer is one of the aggressive primary tumors as evident by high rate of incidence and mortality. Conventional treatments (e.g. chemotherapy) suffer from various drawbacks including wide drug distribution, low localized drug concentration, and severe off-site toxicity. Therefore, they cannot satisfy the mounting need for safe and efficient cancer therapeutics, and alternative novel strategies are needed. Nano-based drug delivery systems (NDDSs) are among these novel approaches that can improve the overall therapeutic outcomes. NDDSs are designed to encapsulate drug molecules and target them specifically to liver cancer. Thus, NDDSs can selectively deliver therapeutic agents to the tumor cells and avoid distribution to off-target sites which should improve the safety profile of the active agents. Nonetheless, NDDSs should be well designed, in terms of the preparing materials, nanocarriers structure, and the targeting strategy, in order to accomplish these objectives. This review discusses the latest advances of NDDSs for cancer therapy with emphasis on the aforementioned essential design components. The review also entails the challenges associated with the clinical translation of NDDSs, and the future perspectives towards next-generation NDDSs.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the primary forms of liver cancer and is currently the sixth most prevalent malignancy worldwide. In addition to surgical interventions, effective drug treatment is essential for treating HCC. With an increasing number of therapeutic drugs for liver cancer undergoing clinical studies, the therapeutic strategies for advanced HCC are more diverse than ever, leading to improved prospects for HCC patients. Molecular targeted drugs and immunotherapies have become crucial treatment options for HCC. Treatment programs include single-agent molecular-targeted drugs, immunotherapies, combinations of immunotherapies with molecular-targeted drugs, and dual immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, further exploration is necessary to determine the optimal pharmacological treatment regimens, and the development of new effective drugs is urgently needed. This review provides an overview of the current globally approved drugs for liver cancer, as well as the latest advances in ongoing clinical research and drug therapies. Additionally, the review offers an outlook and discussion on the prospects for the development of drug therapy approaches for HCC.

Despite advances in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over the last few decades, treatment opportunities for patients with HCC remain limited. HCC is the most common form of liver cancer, accounting for approximately 90% of all cases worldwide. Moreover, apart from the current pharmacological interventions, hepatic resection and liver transplantation are the mainstay curative approaches for patients with HCC. This systematic review included phase I, II, III, and IV clinical trials (CTs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on current treatments for patients with HCC in Asian populations (2013-2023). A total of 427 articles were screened, and 184 non-duplicate publications were identified. After screening the titles and abstracts, 96 publications were excluded, and another 28 were excluded after full-text screening. The remaining 60 eligible RCTs/CTs were finally included. A total of 60 clinical trials fulfilled our inclusion criteria with 36 drugs used as monotherapy or combination therapy for HCC. Most studies used sorafenib alone or in combination with any of the treatment regimens. Lenvatinib or atezolizumab with bevacizumab was used for HCC after initial sorafenib treatment. Eighteen studies compared the efficacy of sorafenib with that of other drugs, including lenvatinib, cabozantinib, tepotinib, tigatuzumab, linifanib, erlotinib, resminostat, brivanib, tislelizumab, selumetinib, and refametinib. This study provides comprehensive insights into effective treatment interventions for HCC in Asian populations. The overall assessment indicates that sorafenib, used alone or in combination with atezolizumab and bevacizumab, has been the first treatment choice in the past decade to achieve better outcomes in patients with HCC in Asian populations.

Liver cancer is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death in the world, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of liver cancer. More than half of the HCC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage and often require systemic therapy. Dysregulation of the activity of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) is involved in the development and progress of HCC, RTKs are therefore the potential targets for systemic therapy of advanced HCC (aHCC). Currently, a total of six small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved for aHCC, including first-line sorafenib, lenvatinib, and donafenib, and second-line regorafenib, cabozantinib, and apatinib. These TKIs improved patients survival, which are associated with disease stage, etiology, liver function, tumor burden, baseline levels of alpha-fetoprotein, and treatment history. This review focuses on the clinical outcomes of these TKIs in key clinical trials, retrospective and real-world studies and discusses the future perspectives of TKIs for aHCC, with an aim to provide up-to-date evidence for decision-making in the treatment of aHCC.

Comparing the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with or without hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in HBV-related advanced HCC and exploring prognostic predictors of the combined regimen.

A total of 194 patients diagnosed with HBV-related advanced HCC between 2020 and 2022 were included in the study, including 99 in the HAIC combined with PD-1 inhibitors plus TKIs (HPT group) and 95 in the PD-1 inhibitors plus TKIs (PT group). The efficacy was evaluated according to the tumor response rate and survival, and the safety was evaluated according to the adverse events.

The HPT group showed higher overall response rate and disease control rate than the PT group. The median overall survival (OS) of the HPT group and the PT group were 18.10 months and 12.57 months, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.519, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.374-0.722, P < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.20 months in the HPT group and 6.33 months in the PT group (HR = 0.632, 95% CI: 0.470-0.851, P = 0.002). In addition, albumin bilirubin (ALBI) and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) are independent prognostic factors affecting HAIC combined with targeted immunotherapy and can be used as prognostic predictors. Almost all patients included in the study experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of varying degrees of severity, with grade 1-2 adverse events predominating.

The HPT group had better OS and PFS than the PT group in patients with HBV-related advanced HCC. In addition, high ALBI and high SIRI were associated with poor prognosis in the HAIC combined group.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of liver cancer, accounting for ~90% of liver neoplasms. It is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths and the seventh most common cancer worldwide. Although there have been rapid developments in the treatment of HCC over the past decade, the incidence and mortality rates of HCC remain a challenge. With the widespread use of the hepatitis B vaccine and antiviral therapy, the etiology of HCC is shifting more toward metabolic-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Early-stage HCC can be treated with potentially curative strategies such as surgical resection, liver transplantation, and radiofrequency ablation, improving long-term survival. However, most HCC patients, when diagnosed, are already in the intermediate or advanced stages. Molecular targeted therapy, followed by immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy, has been a revolution in HCC systemic treatment. Systemic treatment of HCC especially for patients with compromised liver function is still a challenge due to a significant resistance to immune checkpoint blockade, tumor heterogeneity, lack of oncogenic addiction, and lack of effective predictive and therapeutic biomarkers.

The efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib plus programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have rarely been evaluated and it is unknown which factors are related to efficacy.

To evaluate the efficacy and independent predictive factors of TACE combined with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors for unresectable HCC.

This study retrospectively enrolled patients with unresectable HCC who received TACE/lenvatinib/PD-1 treatment between March 2019 and April 2022. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated in accordance with the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Additionally, the prognostic factors affecting the clinical outcome were assessed.

One hundred and two patients were enrolled with a median follow-up duration of 12.63 months. The median OS was 26.43 months (95%CI: 17.00-35.87), and the median PFS was 10.07 months (95%CI: 8.50-11.65). The ORR and DCR were 61.76% and 81.37%, respectively. The patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Classification (BCLC) B stage, early neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) response (decrease), or early alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response (decrease > 20%) had superior OS and PFS than their counterparts.

This study showed that TACE/lenvatinib/PD-1 treatment was well tolerated with encouraging efficacy in patients with unresectable HCC. The patients with BCLC B-stage disease with early NLR response (decrease) and early AFP response (decrease > 20%) may achieve better clinical outcomes with this triple therapy.

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody combined with bevacizumab (a monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor) has been established as first-line systemic treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Radiotherapy is a crucial local treatment for HCC. Mutual efficacy enhancement has been reported between radiotherapy, anti-angiogenesis therapy and immunotherapy in preclinical researches, but not been validated in clinical practice. Whether radiotherapy can enhance efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy plus bevacizumab for HCC remains unclear. This retrospective observational study aimed to appraise efficacy and safety of the combination of radiotherapy with pembrolizumab (a PD-1 monoclonal antibody) and bevacizumab for advanced HCC for the first time.

Patients with advanced HCC treated by intrahepatic tumor-directed moderately hypo-fractionated radiotherapy combined with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab were consecutively included. Clinicopathological characteristics, therapeutic outcomes and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were recorded and evaluated.

A total of 23 patients were eventually enrolled. Median cycles of pembrolizumab and bevacizumab were 4 (median, 1-8) and 4 (median, 1-9) cycles. The objective response rates and disease control rates of irradiated intrahepatic HCC and non-irradiated extrahepatic HCC were 34.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.4-57.3%] vs. 10.0% (95% CI, 1.2-31.7%), and 91.3% (95% CI, 72.0-98.9%) vs. 70.0% (95% CI, 45.7-88.1%), respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.6 (95% CI, 4.7-8.5) and 18.3 (95% CI, 8.2-33.6) months, and 12-month PFS and OS rates were 17.5% (95% CI, 7.0-28.0%) and 60.9% (95% CI, 50.7-71.1%). Two patients (8.7%) with locally advanced, unresectable HCC eventually underwent curative resection of tumors after this trimodal treatment. Eighteen patients (78.3%) had ≥ grade 3 TRAEs, with myelosuppression and transaminase increase as the most common.

This study firstly reported that combining radiotherapy with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab was preliminarily a feasible and effective therapeutic choice for advanced HCC in despite of more TRAEs. This tri-modal regimen may be a potential conversion therapy for unresectable, locally advanced HCC. The limitations of this study are its retrospective nature and small sample size; therefore, big-sample prospective studies are warranted to further investigate this tri-modal regimen.

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) and lenvatinib in HCC patients with PVTT (Vp2-3), thus providing a safe and effective treatment strategy for advanced HCC patients.

Clinical data of 227 patients with unresectable HCC and PVTT treated at the Union Hospital from January 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to their treatment methods: TACE+PEI+lenvatinib group (N=103) and TACE+lenvatinib group (N=124).

The proportion of patients with disappearance, shrinkage, or no change of PVTT after treatment was significantly higher in the TACE+PEI+lenvatinib group compared to the TACE+lenvatinib group, with statistical significance (P<0.001). The TACE+PEI+lenvatinib group had higher objective response rate (ORR) (50.5% vs. 25.8%, P<0.001) and disease control rate (DCR) (87.4% vs. 74.2%, P=0.013) than the TACE+lenvatinib group. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of the TACE+PEI+lenvatinib group was longer than that of the TACE+lenvatinib group (8.1 months vs. 6.5 months, P<0.001). Consistently, the median overall survival (mOS) of the TACE+PEI+lenvatinib group was longer than that of the TACE+lenvatinib group (17.1 months vs. 13.9 months, P<0.001).

Among HCC patients with PVTT (Vp2-3), TACE+PEI+lenvatinib is more effective comparing to TACE+lenvatinib in prolonging PFS and OS. The control of PVTT in the TACE+PEI+lenvatinib group was significantly more satisfactory than that in the TACE+lenvatinib group. TACE+PEI+lenvatinib is a safe and effective treatment strategy for HCC patients with PVTT (Vp2-3).

Small molecule compounds targeting multiple kinases involved in neoangiogenesis have shown survival benefits in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Nonetheless, despite the beneficial effects of multikinase inhibitors (MKIs), a lack of boosting adjuvant limits their objective response rate. Lipid conjugates have been used to improve delivery efficacy or pharmaceutical benefits for decades. However, the feasibility of utilizing lipid-drug conjugates (LDCs) in HCC regimens remains untested. In this study, oral feeding of linoleate-fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugates showed that the compound was well distributed in a spontaneous HCC mouse model. Therefore, a rationale design was developed for chemically synthesizing a linoleate-pazopanib conjugate (LAPC). The LAPC showed a significantly improved cytotoxicity compared to the parental drug pazopanib. Pazopanib's angiogenic suppressing signals were not observed in LAPC-treated HCC cells, potentially suggesting an altered mechanism of action (MOA). In an efficacy trial comparing placebo, oral pazopanib, and LAPC treatments in the hepatitis B virus transgene-related spontaneous HCC mouse model (HBVtg-HCC), the LAPC treatment demonstrated superior tumor ablating capacity in comparison to both placebo and pazopanib treatments, without any discernible systemic toxicity. The LAPC exposure is associated with an apoptosis marker (Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling [TUNEL]) and an enhanced ferroptosis (glutathione peroxidase 4 [GPX4]) potential in HBVtg-HCC tumors. Therefore, the LAPC showed excellent HCC ablative efficacy with altered MOA. The molecular mechanisms of the LAPC and LDCs for HCC therapeutics are of great academic interest. Further comprehensive preclinical trials (e.g., chemical-manufacture-control, toxicity, distribution, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics) are expected.

Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lenvatinib compared with Sorafenib for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients under real-world setting.

We retrieved relevant literature through the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from 1 January 2000 to 25 June 2022. The differences in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) as well as treatment adverse related events were evaluated between HCC patients treated with Lenvatinib and Sorafenib using fixed or random-effects models. The MINORS evaluation questionnaire was used to assess the quality of the included literature.

This meta-analysis included a total of 9 single-arm studies and 6 comparative studies. In the meta-analysis, Lenvatinib showed significantly longer median OS than Sorafenib ( P  < 0.01, MD = 1.20, 95% CI [0.92-1.48]), as well as median PFS ( P  < 0.01, OR = 2.68, 95% CI [1.59-3.76]), and higher ORR( P  < 0.01, OR = 5.36, 95% CI [3.42-8.40]), DCR( P  < 0.01, OR = 2.17, 95% CI [1.64-2.86]). The occurrence of Hypertension was higher in Lenvatinib than in Sorafenib treatment ( P  < 0.01, MD = 5.27, 95% CI [2.38-11.66]), and there was no significant difference in Hand-foot syndrome between Lenvatinib and Sorafenib.

We found that treatment with Lenvatinib in HCC patients resulted in better OS, PFS, and higher ORR and DCR compared to Sorafenib. However, safety data indicated that Lenvatinib did not exhibit a significant advantage.

This project aimed to produce a biosimilar version of aflibercept (AFL) and evaluate the effect of the co-treatment of AFL with other vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) blocker drugs. For this purpose, the optimized gene was inserted into the pCHO1.0 plasmid and transfected into the CHO-S cell line. The final concentration of biosimilar-AFL for the selected clone was 782 mg/L. Results revealed that the inhibition potential of the biosimilar-AFL on HUVEC cells was significant at 10 and 100 nM concentrations and in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, co-treatment of biosimilar-AFL with Everolimus (EVR), Lenvatinib (LEN), and Sorafenib (SOR) could reduce HUVEC cell viability/proliferation, more than when used alone. When LEN and SOR were co-treated with biosimilar-AFL, their cytotoxicity increased 10-fold. The most and least efficient combination was seen when biosimilar-AFL combined with LEN and EVR, respectively. Finally, biosimilar-AFL may improve the efficiency of LEN, EVR, and SOR in reducing the VEGF effect on endothelial cells.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death, worldwide. The predominant causative factor for HCC is hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with anti-angiogenic therapy for the first-line treatment of the unresectable HCC and to evaluate the benefits of different geographic regions and etiology stratifications.

Randomized clinical trials published up to 12th November 2022 were searched by online databases. Moreover, effects of hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted from included studies. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI for objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were calculated.

A total of 3057 patients from five phase III randomized clinical trials were collected and reviewed for this meta-analysis. The pooled HR of OS (HR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.60-0.85) and PFS (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.53-0.77) demonstrated significantly better benefit in PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combination group than targeted monotherapy to treat unresectable HCC. In addition, combination therapy showed better ORR and DCR, with ORs of 3.29 (95% CI: 1.92-5.62) and 1.88 (95% CI: 1.35-2.61), respectively. The subgroup analysis indicated that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combination therapy was significantly superior to anti-angiogenic monotherapy for HBV-related HCC in terms of OS (HR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.55-0.74) and PFS (HR = 0.53; 95% CI:0.47-0.59), while there was no significant difference in patients with HCV (OS, HR = 0.81, p = 0.1) or non-viral (OS, HR = 0.91, p = 0.37; PFS, HR = 0.77, p = 0.05).

Meta-analysis revealed for the first-time that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combination therapy for unresectable HCC was associated with better clinical outcomes than anti-angiogenic monotherapy, especially for HBV infection and Asian population.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common causes of malignancy-related deaths. Lenvatinib, as a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has gained increasing attention for its antitumor activity. However, the effect and mechanisms of Lenvatinib on HCC metastasis are virtually unknown. In this study, we revealed that Lenvatinib inhibited HCC cell motility and epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), along with cell adhesion and extension. Concomitant high DNMT1 and UHRF1 mRNA levels were in HCC patients and indicated worse prognosis. On the one hand, Lenvatinib modulated the transcription of UHRF1 and DNMT1via negatively regulation of ERK/MAPK pathway. On the other hand, Lenvatinib downregulated DNMT1 and UHRF1 expression by promoting their protein degradation through ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, consequently, resulting in upregulation of E-Cadherin. Moreover, Lenvatinib attenuated Huh7 cell adhesion and metastasis in vivo. Our findings provided insight into the intriguing molecular mechanisms regarding the anti-metastasis effect of Lenvatinib in HCC.

Lenvatinib and sorafenib are first-line oral multikinase inhibitors approved for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the choice of the primary therapeutic agent among these two remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib and sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC.

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched for relevant research published up to June 30, 2022. After quality assessment and data extraction of the included studies, RevMan 5.3 software was used for analysis. Odds ratio (OR) and hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a fixed-effects or random-effects model.

Fifteen studies containing 3908 patients were included after final scrutiny. Our meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the lenvatinib and sorafenib groups (HR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.72-1.02; p = 0.09); however, the progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.53-0.74; p < 0.00001), complete response (CR) (OR = 5.61; 95% CI: 2.71-11.64; p < 0.00001), partial response (PR) (OR = 4.62; 95% CI: 3.06-6.98; p < 0.00001), objective response rate (ORR) (OR = 5.61; 95% CI: 3.90-8.09; p < 0.00001), and disease control rate (DCR) (OR = 2.42; 95% CI: 1.79-3.28; p < 0.00001) in the lenvatinib group were significantly better than those in the sorafenib group. In terms of treatment safety, lenvatinib had similar incidences of any grade adverse events (AEs) (OR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.47-2.09; p = 0.98) and grade ≥ 3 AEs (OR = 1.17, 95% CI; 1.00-1.37; p = 0.05) compared to sorafenib. Besides, lenvatinib was significantly associated with a higher incidence of hypertension, proteinuria, fatigue, decreased appetite, and weight loss, whereas sorafenib was associated with a higher incidence of diarrhea and hand-foot skin reaction (p < 0.05).

Given its potential survival benefit and good tolerability, lenvatinib is an appropriate and promising alternative to sorafenib as first-line systemic therapy in patients with advanced HCC.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD 42022327398.

Lenvatinib was approved in 2018 as a first-line treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide the most updated evidence about the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib as a first-line treatment for unresectable HCC. An electronic search of the PubMed database, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library was undertaken to identify all relevant studies up to May 2022. The pooled effect sizes were calculated based on the random-effects model. One phase III randomized controlled trial and 23 retrospective studies of 2438 patients were eligible for analysis. For patients treated with lenvatinib as first-line treatment, the pooled median overall survival (OS), median progression-free survival (PFS), 1-year OS rate, 1-year PFS rate, objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were 11.36 months, 6.68 months, 56.0%, 27.0%, 36.0% and 75.0%, respectively. Lenvatinib showed a significantly superior efficacy compared with sorafenib (HR for OS, 0.85 and HR for PFS, 0.72; OR for ORR, 4.25 and OR for DCR, 2.23). The current study demonstrates that lenvatinib can provide better tumor responses and survival benefits than sorafenib as a first-line treatment for unresectable HCC, with a comparable incidence of adverse events.