Managing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is becoming increasingly common. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous thermal ablation for treating HCC in patients with TIPS.

This retrospective longitudinal study was conducted at Nantes University Hospital. The main inclusion criteria were patients undergoing percutaneous thermal ablation for HCC. Patients with a pre-existing TIPS were included in the 'TIPS group'. A 1:1 control group without TIPS, the 'n-TIPS group', was created for this case-control study. The primary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival over 12 months. Safety was assessed by comparing complications between the groups.

Between 2008 and 2020, 371 patients underwent percutaneous thermal ablation for HCC. The 'TIPS group' included 34 patients (66 nodules), while 34 patients (84 nodules) were randomly assigned to the 'n-TIPS group.' Overall survival rates at 1 year were 97% and 94% respectively (p = 0.52). The progression-free survival rate was 68% and 57% respectively (p = 0.35). No deaths occurred within 30 days post-procedure. There were 3 immediate complications in the TIPS group and 4 in the n-TIPS group (p = 1), none of which were related to the TIPS, including thrombosis.

Percutaneous thermal ablation for HCC in patients with TIPS appears to be as safe and effective as in TIPS-naïve patients. These results suggest that the presence of a TIPS should not be considered a contraindication for percutaneous thermal ablation in treating HCC.

Malignant biologic behaviors, such as microvascular invasion (MVI), satellite nodule formation, and poor differentiation, can appear in the postoperative pathology of early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which often indicates an earlier stage of malignant evolution. This study aimed to evaluate tumor recurrence in patients with HCC meeting the Milan criteria who underwent postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE) according to postoperative pathologic indices.

A retrospective study was conducted on 790 patients with HCC meeting the Milan criteria who underwent hepatectomy across 4 medical centers, consisting of 366 patients treated with PA-TACE and 424 patients treated without PA-TACE. To reduce selection bias, propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:1 ratio was applied, achieving balanced clinical characteristics between the 2 groups.

Patients who underwent PA-TACE did not experience severe adverse events or toxicity-related deaths. After PSM of each subgroup, it was found that patients with MVI (median time: 37 vs 17 months; P =.010), satellite nodules (median time: Not Applicable [NA] vs 14 months; P =.018), and Edmondson-Steiner grades III and IV (median time: NA vs 13 months; P =.004) who received PA-TACE had higher recurrence-free survival (RFS). However, patients who were MVI negative, satellite nodule negative, and Edmondson-Steiner grades I and II did not benefit from PA-TACE in terms of RFS (all P >.05). Patients who received PA-TACE were more likely to undergo liver transplantation, rehepatectomy, or local ablation after tumor recurrence, whereas those who did not receive PA-TACE were more likely to receive TACE, chemoradiotherapy, or immune-targeted therapy after tumor recurrence (all P<.05).

Postoperative pathologic indicators can guide the selection of PA-TACE for patients with HCC meeting the Milan criteria. Patients with MVI, satellite nodules, and Edmondson-Steiner grades III and IV are more suitable for receiving PA-TACE to improve RFS. PA-TACE may alter the recurrence pattern of tumors, rendering them more localized.

This study was designed to assess the effects of surgery method on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This is a retrospective study. Patients diagnosed with primary HCC (N = 10,174) were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database from 2010 to 2017 and categorized into surgical (N = 4950) and nonsurgical (N = 5224) groups. The characteristics of patients were balanced by propensity score matching. Multivariate Cox analysis was used to explore independent prognostic factors for outcomes in both groups, and the Kaplan-Meier curve showed survival rates in each group. The surgical patients were subclassified by surgical method, whether local tumor destruction, wedge or segmental resection, lobotomy resection, or liver transplantation (LT). Finally, survival rates in the 2 groups were investigated by subgroup analysis. After propensity score matching, sex, grade, tumor node metastasis III/IV, surgery, chemotherapy, alpha-fetoprotein, number of regional lymph nodes, other race, and age > 70 were independent prognostic factors in the 2 groups. The OS (HR = 0.290, P < .001) and CSS (HR = 0.274, P < .001) rates of patients were higher in the surgical group than in the nonsurgical group. There was no obvious improvement in CSS in patients who received radiotherapy combined with surgery compared with patients who only received radiotherapy (HR = 0.813, P = .279). LT was consistently found to be the best of the 4 surgical methods. The OS of stage II patients undergoing LT was better than that of corresponding stage III patients, and lobectomy resection was the best choice for stage IV patients (HR = 0. 417, P = .023). In grade III patients, the median CSS time was longer than the OS time. The survival rate of patients treated with chemotherapy combined with LT was higher than that of patients who did not receive chemotherapy and only received LT. Patients with HCC who underwent surgery had better OS and CSS. Subgroup analysis showed that LT can improve the survival rate and median survival time of patients.

Few studies have compared survival outcomes between liver resection (LR) and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treating solitary 3-5 cm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to clarify this issue.

Patients with Child-Pugh class A liver disease and a solitary HCC of 3-5 cm without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis who underwent LR or percutaneous RFA between 2011 and 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study; 310 patients underwent LR and 114 patients underwent percutaneous RFA. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline variables, including age, sex, alpha-fetoprotein level, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, between the two groups.

Before PSM, 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were significantly lower in the percutaneous RFA group than in the LR group (both p < 0.001). After PSM, 5-year OS was comparable between the two modalities (p = 0.367); however, 5-year RFS was significantly lower in the RFA group than in the LR group (p = 0.001). The two modalities did not differ in severe post-treatment complications (p = 1.000).

Five-year OS did not differ between treatment modalities for patients with a solitary HCC of 3-5 cm; however, the LR group's 5-year RFS was superior. LR should be recommended as the first-line treatment for these patients.

The appropriateness of ablation for liver cancer patients meeting the Milan criteria remains controversial.

This study aims to evaluate the long-term outcomes of MR-guided thermal ablation for HCC patients meeting the Milan criteria and develop a nomogram for predicting survival rates.

A retrospective analysis was conducted from January 2009 to December 2021 at a single institution. Patients underwent MR-guided thermal ablation. Factors influencing progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were identified using univariate and multivariate Cox regression and stepwise regression. A nomogram was developed for survival prediction, followed by risk stratification and internal validation. Adverse events (AEs) were also analyzed.

A total of 181 patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 73.8 ± 31.7 months. The cumulative local tumor progression rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 0.80%, 1.27%, and 1.86%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS rates were 81.8%, 57.4%, and 38.1%, and OS rates were 98.3%, 87.8%, and 62.9%. Poorer outcomes were associated with age ≤ 60 years, tumor size > 2 cm, multiple tumors, cirrhosis, proximity to major vessels, and narrow ablation margins (P < 0.05). The nomogram accurately predicted 3- and 5-year survival, and internal validation confirmed the results. AEs occurred in 33.7% of patients, with pain being the most common.

MR-guided ablation is effective for HCC patients within the Milan criteria, especially for those with smaller tumors and better liver function. The nomogram and risk stratification model are valuable tools for predicting patient outcomes and guiding treatment.

In this expert opinion, we provide the rationale for concluding that radiation segmentectomy (using the RADSEG method) - a technique involving the transarterial delivery of an ablative, complete necrosis-inducing dose of yttrium-90 radiotherapy - is curative in limited-disease burden hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Currently, curative options for early stage and other carefully selected HCC cases include transplantation, resection, and ablation. Because of issues with organ availability, co-morbidities preventing resection, and tumour size and location limiting ablation, other treatments are necessary for this selected patient population. The RADSEG method has evolved into an intra-arterial approach in this setting, with long-term outcomes comparable to ablation, resection, and transplantation. It is proposed that yttrium-90 radioembolisation, applying the RADSEG technique, be formally recognised as curative for early HCC.

To correlate preablation needle biopsy-acquired histopathologic grade of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) 5 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with postablation local tumor control rate, intrahepatic distant tumor progression-free survival, and overall survival.

This single-center, retrospective cohort study included adult patients with LI-RADS 5 HCC who underwent a preablation core needle biopsy within 3 months prior to thermal ablation from January 2015 to December 2022. Histopathologic grade from the needle biopsy was evaluated as predictor of local tumor control rate, intrahepatic distant tumor progression-free survival, and overall survival. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using the Gehan generalized Wilcoxon test.

The study group comprised 133 patients (mean age, 67 years [SD ± 10]; 107 men) with LI-RADS 5 confirmed HCC, stratified into 18 poorly differentiated tumors (median follow-up, 27.7 months; interquartile range [IQR], 15.5-55.4 months) and 115 well-differentiated/moderately differentiated tumors (median follow-up, 29.2 months; IQR, 15.4-59.9 months). No difference in local tumor control rate was noted between the 2 cohorts (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16; 95% CI, 0.32-4.23; P = .898). There was significantly lower intrahepatic distant tumor progression-free survival after thermal ablation in the poorly differentiated cohort (HR, 2.54; 95% CI, 0.92-7.05; P < .001). The overall survival in the poorly differentiated cohort was also lower, although this did not reach statistical significance (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.60-5.26; P = .202).

Patients with needle biopsy-proven poorly differentiated LI-RADS 5 HCC had significantly lower intrahepatic distant tumor progression-free survival after thermal ablation compared with those with well-differentiated/moderately differentiated HCC.

Background/Objectives: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an important local treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of tumor recurrence after RFA and analyze predictors of tumor recurrence and survival in patients with HCC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from treatment-naïve patients with HCC who underwent RFA for HCC treatment between 2008 and 2017 at four tertiary hospitals in South Korea. Results: A total of 636 patients with HCC treated with RFA were enrolled in the study. The mean age was 66.3 ± 10.4 years, with 75.0% of patients being male. Most patients (96.7%) had underlying liver cirrhosis, and viral hepatitis (types B and C) accounted for most cases. The average maximum tumor size was 2.2 ± 0.9 cm, with 84.3% of tumors being single lesions. During the follow-up period, 331 patients experienced recurrence, with 95.5% of cases being intrahepatic and one-fifth occurring at the RFA site. Most patients underwent RFA or transarterial chemoembolization as subsequent therapy for recurrence. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, and Child-Pugh class B status were independent factors associated with tumor recurrence. Only the ALBI grade was significantly associated with mortality. Additionally, the ALBI grade differentiated between recurrence-free survival and overall survival in the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Conclusions: The ALBI grade was independently associated with tumor recurrence and prognosis in patients with HCC following RFA. This grading system can help clinicians identify high-risk patients, optimize treatment strategies, and enhance patient care.

Ablation is one of the main methods for local treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Different from radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA) is not limited by tissue conductivity, and can use multiple electrodes at the same time to improve ablation efficiency. In addition, MWA can form a larger ablation area, which makes it possible to completely ablate large HCC. However, MWA may be incomplete due to factors such as larger tumors or tumors in high-risk areas. The mechanism by which the cellular and tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) is involved in the in vitro effects of incomplete microwave ablation (iMWA) needs to be further elucidated.

H22 tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice were treated with iMWA with several combinations of ablation power and time duration. The effects of iMWA on the genes of HCC cancer cells and the TIME were investigated by RNA sequencing, mass cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence. The effect of iMWA in combination with anti-Gr-1 on HCC tumor growth was also evaluated.

Thermal stress generated by iMWA induced coagulative necrosis and apoptosis in the region of the ablation center of HCC. RNA sequencing analysis showed that iMWA can boost chemokine CXCL5, which was further confirmed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Mass cytometry results showed that relative to Ctrl group, iMWA-treated led to decreased CD4+ T, CD8+ T, Natural killer (NK), macrophages including both M1 and M2 types but increased monocytes and bone marrow-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). Therefore, inhibiting MDSC is the main target in the later stage of iMWA. In vivo results showed that the tumor volume and weight of iMWA+ anti-Gr-1 group were significantly reduced compared with iMWA+ anti-IgG group. In addition, the merged expressions of CD11b and Gr-1 proteins were found reduced in the iMWA+ anti-Gr-1 group compared with the iMWA+ anti-IgG group by immunofluorescence staining. Immunohistochemistry suggested that CD8 was enriched in the iMWA+ anti-Gr-1 group but not in the iMWA+ anti-IgG group.

Our data suggests that iMWA and Gr-1 blocking combined therapy can further inhibit HCC growth and significantly improve the CD8+ T cells in the mouse subcutaneous tumor model, which brings good news to HCC patients.

The optimal choice of treatment for early-stage hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) remains controversial, with recent conflicted guidelines. This systematic review evaluated whether ablation is oncologically non-inferior to surgical resection.

We performed a systematic search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL and Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials comparing tumor ablation and surgical resection for early-stage HCCs. A non-inferiority margin of 5% (RR 0.93) for overall survival (OS) was considered, following a consensus of clinical experts.

We identified 5829 citations from which 11 trials (n = 1736) were included. The non-inferiority of tumor ablation was not observed for OS (RR 0.92; 95%CI 0.85-1.00,I2 = 33%). Recurrence-free survival was reduced with ablation (RR 0.80; 95%CI 0.69-0.93,I2 = 49%). There was no difference in terms of extra-hepatic recurrence and minor complications. Tumor ablation was associated with decreased overall morbidity (RR 0.43; 95%CI 0.30-0.62,I2 = 31%) and major complications (RR 0.22; 95%CI 0.07-0.71,I2 = 66%). Intra-hepatic recurrence was higher with ablation (RR 1.28; 95%CI 1.10-1.48,I2 = 12%). Certainty of evidence was low to moderate.

We did not observe the oncological non-inferiority of tumor ablation when compared to surgical resection. Nevertheless, most analyses were of low quality of evidence, including the overall survival. We cannot exclude that the true effect of tumor ablation is different than the currently observed one.

Various treatment modalities are available for small solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), yet the optimal primary treatment strategy for tumors ≤ 3 cm remains unclear. This network meta-analysis investigates the comparative efficacy of various interventions on the long-term outcomes of patients with solitary HCC ≤ 3 cm. A systematic search of electronic databases from January 2000 to December 2023 was conducted to identify studies that compared at least two of the following treatments: surgical resection (SR), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Survival data were extracted, and pooled hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a frequentist network meta-analysis. A total of 30 studies, comprising 2 randomized controlled trials and 28 retrospective studies, involving 8,053 patients were analyzed. Surgical resection showed the highest overall survival benefit with a p-score of 0.95, followed by RFA at 0.59, MWA at 0.23, and TACE, also at 0.23. Moreover, SR provided the most significant recurrence-free survival advantage, with a p-score of 0.95, followed by RFA at 0.31 and MWA at 0.19. Sensitivity analyses, excluding low-quality or retrospective non-matched studies, corroborated these findings. This network meta-analysis demonstrates that SR is the most effective first-line curative treatment for single HCC ≤ 3 cm, followed by RFA in patients with preserved liver function. The limited data on MWA and TACE underscore the need for further studies.

Minimally invasive techniques have significantly gained popularity for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on the Milan criteria. However, whether or not laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a better treatment option remains debatable. We conducted a meta-analysis to review the published data comparing LLR and RFA for HCC through Milan criteria depending on tumor recurrence risk and survival.

PubMed, OvidSP, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to December 31, 2023. The studies comparing the outcomes and methods between LLR and RFA for HCC within the Milan criteria were included.

We recruited 19 cohort studies with 2532 patients. The postoperative complication rate was low, and hospital stays were shorter in the RFA group than in the LLR group. The total tumor recurrence, the local tumor recurrence rate, and the intrahepatic tumor recurrence rate were lower within the LLR group than in the RFA group. There was no significant difference in the extrahepatic recurrence rate between the two groups. Moreover, no significant differences were observed between the groups concerning 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) and 1-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). However, 3-year and 5-year RFS were better within the LLR group than among the RFA group.

The treatment of HCC within the Milan criteria is moving toward multidisciplinary and minimally invasive approaches. Our meta-analysis identified a lower postoperative complication rate and higher recurrence rate for RFA than LLR. RFA could be an alternative treatment due to its comparable long-term efficacy with LLR.

Several locoregional therapies (LRTs) for nonmetastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are available; however, a global comparison of the relative efficacy of each is needed.

To conduct a systematic review and direct, pairwise meta-analytic comparison of all identified randomized clinical trials evaluating the treatment of nonmetastatic HCC.

A comprehensive search of PubMed and the proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Society for Radiation Oncology annual meetings from January 1, 2010, to November 1, 2023, was performed.

Randomized clinical trials using a form of LRT (surgery with or without adjuvant therapy, radiofrequency ablation [RFA], microwave ablation [MWA], radiotherapy [RT], hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy [HAIC], transarterial bland embolization [TAE], transarterial chemoembolization [TACE], or transarterial radioembolization [TARE]).

Study eligibility and data extraction were each reviewed by 2 authors independently. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to compare treatment categories.

Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary outcome; overall survival (OS) was the secondary outcome.

Forty randomized clinical trials reporting on comparative outcomes of 11 576 total patients with localized HCC treated with LRT were included. The median follow-up was 30.0 (IQR, 18.5-40.8) months. Direct pooled comparisons between treatment classes suggested improved outcomes for surgery combined with adjuvant therapy over surgery alone (PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.62 [95% CI, 0.51-0.75]; P < .001; OS: HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.48-0.78]; P < .001), surgery over RFA (PFS: HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.63-0.87]; P < .001; OS: HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.54-0.95]; P = .02), RT over TACE (PFS: HR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.21-0.60]; P < .001; OS: HR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.13-0.97]; P = .04), and HAIC over TACE (PFS: HR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.45-0.72]; P < .001; OS: HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.45-0.75]; P < .001). No substantial heterogeneity was noted for any pairwise comparison with the exception of RT-based regimens compared with tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

The findings of this systematic review and direct, pairwise meta-analysis suggest that all LRTs are not equivalent for the treatment of localized HCC. The efficacy of LRTs appears hierarchical, with surgery-based management outcomes associated with the best treatment outcomes and embolization-based treatment options associated with the worst treatment outcomes.

Liver resection and percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) are considered curative option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to compare short- and long-term outcomes between open liver resection (OLR), laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), and PTA in elderly patients with single HCC and to define a liver map for therapeutic strategy according to HCC location and size.

A multicenter retrospective study was conducted in 10 European Hospital Center, including 239 consecutive liver resection (OLR and LLR) and PTA in elderly patients ≥ 70 years old with single HCC ≤ 30 mm. Perioperative data and long-term oncological outcomes were collected and compared between groups before and after propensity score matching.

A total of 239 patients were enrolled, distributed as follows: 61 in the ORL group, 88 in the LLR group, and 90 in the PTA group. The hospital stay was longer in OLR and LLR groups compared to the PTA group (6, 5 and 3 days, respectively, p < 0.05). Morbidity was lower in the PTA group compared to the OLR group (11 vs. 26%, respectively, p < 0.05). Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was significantly higher in the OLR and LLR groups compared to the PTA group (82, 81, and 34%, respectively, p < 0.001). Disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was also significantly higher in the ORL and LLR groups compared to the PTA group (66, 50 and 20%, respectively, p < 0.001). These results were also confirmed after a propensity score matching analysis between surgery group (OLR and LLR) and the PTA group. PTA was the most used treatment for subcapsular and deep HCC not in contact with vascular structures compared to OLR and LLR.

PTA in elderly patients ensures a shorter hospital stay and lower morbidity but worst survival compared to liver resection.

The effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in improving long-term survival outcomes for patients with a solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) measuring 5 cm or less remains uncertain. This study was designed to elucidate the impact of RFA therapy on the survival outcomes of these patients and to construct a prognostic model for patients following RFA.

This study was performed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2017, focusing on patients diagnosed with a solitary HCC lesion ≤5 cm in size. We compared the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates of these patients with those of patients who received hepatectomy, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy or who were part of a blank control group. To enhance the reliability of our findings, we employed stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (sIPTW) and stratified analyses. Additionally, we conducted a Cox regression analysis to identify prognostic factors. XGBoost models were developed to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS. The XGBoost models were evaluated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, decision curve analysis (DCA) curves and so on.

Regardless of whether the data were unadjusted or adjusted for the use of sIPTWs, the 5-year OS (46.7%) and CSS (58.9%) rates were greater in the RFA group than in the radiotherapy (27.1%/35.8%), chemotherapy (32.9%/43.7%), and blank control (18.6%/30.7%) groups, but these rates were lower than those in the hepatectomy group (69.4%/78.9%). Stratified analysis based on age and cirrhosis status revealed that RFA and hepatectomy yielded similar OS and CSS outcomes for patients with cirrhosis aged over 65 years. Age, race, marital status, grade, cirrhosis status, tumor size, and AFP level were selected to construct the XGBoost models based on the training cohort. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for 1, 3, and 5 years in the validation cohort were 0.88, 0.81, and 0.79, respectively. Calibration plots further demonstrated the consistency between the predicted and actual values in both the training and validation cohorts.

RFA can improve the survival of patients diagnosed with a solitary HCC lesion ≤5 cm. In certain clinical scenarios, RFA achieves survival outcomes comparable to those of hepatectomy. The XGBoost models developed in this study performed admirably in predicting the CSS of patients with solitary HCC tumors smaller than 5 cm following RFA.

To develop multiple machine learning (ML) models based on the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and determine the optimal model for predicting long-term survival outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after local ablation.

From January 2009 to December 2019, we analyzed data from 848 primary HCC patients who underwent local ablation. ML models were constructed and evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), concordance-discordance area under curve (C/D AUC), and Brier scores. The optimal ML model was interpreted using the partial dependence plot (PDP) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework. Additionally, the prognostic performance of our model was compared with other models.

Alkaline phosphatase, preoperation alpha-fetoprotein level, PNI, tumor number, and tumor size were identified as independent prognostic factors for ML model construction. Among the 19 ML algorithms tested, the Aorsf model showed superior performance in both the training cohort (C/D AUC: 0.733; C-index: 0.736; Brier score: 0.133) and validation cohort (C/D AUC: 0.713; C-index: 0.793; Brier score: 0.117). The time-dependent AUC of the Aorsf model for predicting overall survival was as follows: 1-, 3-, 5-, 7-, and 9-year were 0.828, 0.765, 0.781, 0.817, and 0.812 in the training cohort, 0.846, 0.859, 0.824, 0.845, and 0.874 in the validation cohort, respectively. The PDP and SHAP algorithms were employed for visual interpretation. Furthermore, time-AUC and decision curve analysis demonstrated that the Aorsf model provided superior clinical benefits compared to other models.

The PNI-based Aorsf model effectively predicts long-term survival outcomes after ablation therapy, making a significant contribution to HCC research by improving surveillance, prevention, and treatment strategies.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), a form of thermal ablation, employs localized heat to induce protein denaturation in tissue cells, resulting in cell death. It has emerged as a viable treatment option for patients who are ineligible for surgery in various diseases, particularly liver cancer and other tumor-related conditions. In addition to directly eliminating tumor cells, RFA also induces alterations in the infiltrating cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME), which can significantly impact treatment outcomes. Moreover, incomplete RFA (iRFA) may lead to tumor recurrence and metastasis. The current challenge is to enhance the efficacy of RFA by elucidating its underlying mechanisms. This review discusses the clinical applications of RFA in treating various diseases and the mechanisms that contribute to the survival and invasion of tumor cells following iRFA, including the roles of heat shock proteins, hypoxia, and autophagy. Additionally, we analyze‌ the changes occurring in infiltrating cells within the TME after iRFA. Finally, we provide a comprehensive summary of clinical trials involving RFA in conjunction with other treatment modalities in the field of cancer therapy, aiming to offer novel insights and references for improving the effectiveness of RFA.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents a formidable challenge in oncology, demanding innovative treatment approaches. Both adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies, thanks to the introduction of immunotherapy, have emerged as promising strategies in the management of HCC, aiming to reduce the risk of relapse and ultimately to improve survival.

This review considers current evidence, ongoing clinical trials, and future strategies to elucidate the evolving landscape of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments in HCC.

Both adjuvant and neoadjuvant regimens, notably those incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors, demonstrated encouraging safety profiles and efficacy outcomes in HCC.While significant challenges persist, including optimizing patient selection and endpoint definition, the evolving landscape of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy holds promise for maximizing the therapeutic potential of immunotherapy across all stages of HCC. Further insights into tumor biology and host immunity will shape the role of these approaches which are close to becoming reality in clinical practice.

Primary liver cancer is one of the most lethal malignancies in the world. Traditional treatment methods have limitations in terms of efficacy and safety. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) guided by B-ultrasound, as a minimally invasive treatment, has attracted increasing attention in the treatment of primary liver cancer in recent years.

To study the efficacy and safety of RFA were compared with those of traditional surgery (TS) for treating small liver cancer.

At least 2 people were required to search domestic and foreign public databases, including foreign databases such as EMBASE, PubMed and the Cochrane Library, and Chinese databases such as the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database, China Biomedical Literature database, Wanfang database and VIP database. Controlled trials of RFA vs conventional surgery for small liver cancer were retrieved from January 2008 to January 2023. They were screened and evaluated according to the quality evaluation criteria in the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

A total of 10 studies were included in this study, including 1503 patients in the RFA group and 1657 patients in the surgery group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in 1-year overall survival between the two groups (P > 0.05), while the 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates and 1-year, 3-year and 5-year tumor-free survival rates in the surgery group were greater than those in the RFA group (P < 0.05). In terms of complications, the incidence of complications in the RFA group was lower than that in the surgery group (P < 0.05).

In terms of long-term survival, TS is better than RFA for small liver cancer patients. However, RFA has fewer complications and is safer.

Various image-guided ablative procedures include chemical and thermal ablation techniques and irreversible electroporation. These have been used for curative intent for small tumours and palliative intent for debulking, immunogenicity and pain control. Understanding these techniques is critical to avoiding complications and achieving superior clinical outcomes. Additionally, combination with immunotherapy and chemotherapies is rapidly evolving. There are numerous opportunities in interventional radiology to advance ablation techniques and seamlessly integrate into current treatment regimens for both benign and malignant tumours.

Liver resection and ablation remain the most common therapeutic options for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0-A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but there is a lack of evidence to show which is the most suitable therapy. This study aimed to make concurrent multi-arm comparisons of the short-term and long-term outcomes of percutaneous ablation (PA), open (OLR) or laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for these patients.

This was a retrospective observational cohort study. A series of generalized propensity score methods for multiple treatment groups were performed to concurrently compare the clinical outcomes of these three treatment options to balance potential confounders. Regression standardization was used to account for hazard of all-cause mortality and recurrence of intergroup differences.

Of the 1778 patients included, 1237, 307 and 234 underwent OLR, LLR and PA, respectively. After overlap weighting, which was the optimal adjustment strategy, patients in the minimally invasive group (LLR and PA groups) had few postoperative complications and short postoperative hospital stays (both P < 0.001). The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate were significantly higher in the LLR group when compared with the OLR and PA groups (RFS: 55.6% vs 48.0% vs 30.2%, P < 0.001; OS: 89.1% vs 79.7% vs 84.0%, P = 0.020). Multivariable Cox analysis and regression standardization showed that LLR was an independent factor for better RFS when compared with OLR and PA. In subgroup analysis, the long-term outcomes of patients with BCLC stage A HCC were consistent with the whole population.

In the observational study using various covariate adjustment analysis with excellent balance, LLR is not only minimally invasive, but also provides better RFS and equivalent OS for patients with BCLC stage 0-A HCC when compared with OLR and PA.

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of different pre-transplant local treatments on the survival of liver transplantation (LTx) recipients with BCLC Stage A Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). We analyzed data from the Taiwan Cancer Registry and National Health Insurance Research Databases spanning 2012 to 2018. Employing propensity score matching, patients were categorized into three groups: those receiving local treatments (180 patients), hepatectomy (179 patients), and combined treatments (180 patients). The primary outcomes were overall mortality and HCC-specific death, assessed using time-varying Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. During a median follow-up period of 3.92 years, all-cause mortality rates were observed as 74.44% for local treatments, 42.46% for hepatectomy, and 65.00% for combined treatments. HCC-specific mortality rates followed a similar pattern at 65.00%, 39.11%, and 59.44%, respectively. Adjusted hazard ratios demonstrated significantly elevated mortality risks associated with local and combined treatments compared to hepatectomy. Notably, the 2-year overall and HCC-specific survival rates were highest in the hepatectomy group, surpassing those observed in both the combined treatment and local treatment groups. The findings of our study highlight that for patients with BCLC Stage A HCC, undergoing hepatectomy prior to LTx is associated with superior survival outcomes compared to solely local treatments. This underscores the importance of considering hepatectomy as a vital component of the treatment strategy in this patient population.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a potentially curative treatment option for early Hepatocellular carcinoma. The RFA is considered safe with a relatively low incidence of complications ranging from 2%-7.9%. Though most of the complications are self-limiting, sometimes they can be life-threatening. The occurrence of the particular complication depends on various factors like tumour location and morphology, underlying disease and ablation technique. A detailed understanding of potential complications along with the associated risk factors will help to employ strategies to prevent them, identify them early and manage them when they occur. This article demonstrates various radiofrequency ablation-related complications and discusses the risk factors and technical strategies to minimise them and achieve complete ablation of the tumour.

Sarcopenia accompanied by systemic inflammation is associated with poor prognosis in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the effect of sarcopenia combined with systemic inflammation on the prognosis of patients with advanced HCC who underwent hepatectomy is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of sarcopenia and inflammation on the prognosis of patients with advanced HCC.

This retrospective study included 151 patients recruited between July 2010 and December 2022. We defined advanced HCC as that presenting with vascular invasion or tumor size ≥2 cm or multiple tumors. Sarcopenia was assessed using the psoas muscle index. Preoperative inflammatory markers were used by calculating the prognostic nutritional index, albumin-globulin ratio (AGR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the prognostic factors for overall survival.

Of 151 patients, sarcopenia occurred in 84 (55.6 %). Sarcopenia was significantly associated with male sex, older age, body mass index (<25 kg/m2), and a higher NLR. In the multivariate analysis, AGR <1.25 (hazard ratio [HR], 2.504; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.325-4.820; p < 0.05); alpha-fetoprotein levels ≥25 ng/mL (HR, 1.891; 95% CI: 1.016-3.480; p = 0.04); and sarcopenia (HR, 1.908; 95% CI: 1.009-3.776; p < 0.05) were independent predictors of overall survival. The sarcopenia and low AGR groups had significantly worse overall survival than either the non-sarcopenia and high AGR or sarcopenia and low AGR groups.

Sarcopenia and AGR are independent prognostic factors in patients with advanced HCC. Thus, sarcopenia may achieve a better prognostic value when combined with AGR.

More than 800,000 people worldwide are diagnosed with HCC (hepatocellular carcinoma) each year, with approximately 700,000 deaths alone occurring in that same year. Treatment of HCC presents complex therapeutic challenges, particularly in intermediate and advanced stages. LRTs such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and ablations have been the mainstay treatment for early to intermediate-stage HCC, and systemic therapies are used to treat intermediate-late-stage HCC. However, novel literature describing combining LRT with systemic therapies has shown promising results. This review explores recent advances in both liver-directed techniques for hepatocellular carcinoma, including bland transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, radioembolization, and ablative therapies in conjunction as well as with systemic therapies, with a focus on combination therapies, patient selection, procedural technique, periprocedural management, and outcomes. Our findings suggest that LRT combined with systemic therapies is a viable strategy for improving progression-free survival and time to progression for patients with intermediate-to-late-stage HCC. However, further investigation is required to refine treatment protocols and define patient cohorts that would benefit the most.

The approach in small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial, no prospective randomized trials to compare ablative or surgical approaches. We compared the surgical and oncological outcomes after laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in small HCC patients based on matched cohort studies that performed propensity score matching (PSM).

We systemically searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and the Chinese BioMedical Literature (CBM) databases. All published propensity score-matched studies that compared LH and RFA for small HCC were included in this study.

Eight studies with a total of 1273 small HCC cases were included. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in the 1- year overall survival (OS) rate between the two groups, whereas the LH group had significantly higher 3- year overall survival rate (RR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.20, p < 0.00001) as well as 1- and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates (RR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.22-1.42, p < 0.00001; RR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.46-1.90, p < 0.00001) than the RFA group. Meanwhile, the local recurrence rate and intrahepatic distant recurrence rate were significantly lower in the LH group than in the RFA group (RR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.20-0.42, p < 0.00001; RR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.49-0.92, p = 0.01). In comparison with the LH group, the RFA group had a lower incidence of overall and major postoperative complications (RR = 1.81, 95% CI 1.47-2.24, p < 0.00001; RR = 2.76, 95% CI 1.48-5.12, p = 0.001), but there was no significant difference in postoperative mortality between the two groups. In addition, further comparison of single postoperative complications showed that the incidence of ascites was lower in the RFA group than in the LH group (RR = 3.62, 95% CI 1.64-7.96, p = 0.001), whereas there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative bleeding, abdominal infection and bile leakage between the two groups (RR = 3.50, 95% CI 0.74-16.61, p = 0.11; RR = 5.00, 95% CI 0.59-42.23, p = 0.14; RR = 4.00, 95% CI 0.45-35.23, p = 0.21). Besides, the hospital stay was shorter in the RFA group than in the LH group (MD = 4.29, 95% CI 2.06-6.53, p = 0.0002).

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that in comparison with RFA in the treatment of small HCC, LH provided superior long-term OS and DFS together with lower rates of local and intrahepatic distant recurrence after surgery. However, RFA was associated with better short-term outcomes.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) has a poor prognosis and is generally not indicated for surgery. Proton beam therapy (PBT) may offer an alternative treatment. In this study, long-term outcomes were examined in 116 patients (median age 66 years, 100 males) with HCC with advanced PVTT (Vp3 or Vp4) who received PBT from April 2008 to March 2018. Of these patients, 63 received PBT as definitive treatment and 53 as palliative treatment. The representative dose was 72.6 Gy (RBE) in 22 fractions. Eight patients died in follow-up, including 72 due to tumor progression. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 18.0% (95% CI 9.8-26.2%) and the 5-year local control (LC) rate was 86.1% (74.9-97.3%). In multivariate analyses, performance status and treatment strategy were significantly associated with OS. The median follow-up period for survivors with definitive treatment was 33.5 (2-129) months, and the 5-year OS rate was 25.1% (12.9-37.3%) in these cases. The median survival time after definitive irradiation was >20 months. The 5-year OS rate was 9.1% (0-19.7%) for palliative irradiation. These results compare favorably with those of other therapies and suggest that PBT is a useful option for cases of HCC with advanced PVTT that cannot undergo surgery, with an expected survival benefit and good local control. Determining the optimal indication for this treatment is a future challenge.