Background/Objectives: Extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas (EP-NECs) are rare, aggressive malignancies with no standardized treatment approach. Although platinum-based chemotherapy is considered the first-line therapy, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) remain limited. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and pathological characteristics of EP-NEC patients, their treatment responses, and survival outcomes. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 29 EP-NEC patients diagnosed and followed between 2015 and 2024. Clinical and demographic data, tumor localization, disease stage, administered treatments, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess OS and PFS, with subgroup comparisons performed via the log-rank test. Results: The most common primary tumor sites were the pancreas (21%), prostate (17%), and cervix (14%). At diagnosis, 55.2% of patients had metastatic disease. First-line platinum-based chemotherapy achieved an objective response rate of 82.1%, with a median PFS of 8.16 months and a median OS of 14.16 months. Surgical intervention significantly improved survival (p = 0.020), while a high Ki-67 proliferation index (>80%) was associated with worse PFS (p = 0.032). Other factors, including smoking status and liver-directed therapies, had no significant impact on survival. Conclusions: EP-NECs present with a poor prognosis despite platinum-based chemotherapy achieving high response rates. Surgical resection improves survival outcomes, whereas high Ki-67 expression is associated with a worse prognosis. These findings highlight the need for further research into novel therapeutic strategies for EP-NECs.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma (panNEC) is a poorly differentiated, highly malignant neoplasm with an extremely poor prognosis. This tumor often presents as locally advanced or unresectable at the initial diagnosis.

A 72-year-old woman presented to our hospital with weight loss. A computed tomography scan showed an enhanced tumor measuring 32 mm in the pancreatic head region, with contact to the common hepatic artery over 180°. The pathological findings from the specimens obtained via endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration identified small cell-type NEC with extensive necrosis, leading to a diagnosis of locally advanced unresectable panNEC. Accordingly, she began a course of carboplatin and etoposide therapy. After 7 courses, given the significant shrinkage of the tumor, we performed a pancreatoduodenectomy as a conversion surgery. Pathological examination revealed a localized, residual nodule of NEC, consisting mainly of large neoplastic cells, with carcinoma in situ components scattered within and around the nodule. In addition, the diffuse membrane expression of somatostatin receptor 2 was observed in NEC components. Each component showed the same type of KRAS mutation (p.G12V) and was considered to originate from a single primary tumor in the pancreas. She received 3 courses of the same regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy and has remained recurrence-free for 24 months.

This is a rare case of successful conversion surgery for locally advanced, unresectable panNEC after chemotherapy, providing several important histopathological and molecular insights.

Although, recently observation methods has been proposed as one of the treatment options for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NF-PanNENs), determining treatment strategies may be difficult for small and low-malignant NF-PanNENs; thus, clarifying the significance of lymphatic, microvascular, and perineural invasion in these patients is of great clinical importance. This study aimed to assess the incidence and role of lymphatic, microvascular, and perineural invasion in patients with NF-PanNENs based on tumor size and the 2022 World Health Organization classification.

From 2000 to 2023, we retrospectively investigated the incidence of lymphatic, microvascular, and perineural invasion and their impact on recurrence in 80 patients who underwent curative resection and were diagnosed with NF-PanNENs.

Of the 80 patients, 14 (18%), 20 (25%), and six (9%) patients had lymphatic, microvascular, and perineural invasion. Patients with neuroendocrine tumor (NET) G1 had significantly fewer occurrences of lymphatic, microvascular, and perineural invasion than those with NET G2 (10%, 15%, and 7% vs. 40%, 55%, and 35%; all P < 0.05.). Patients with a tumor size < 20 mm had significantly lower rates of lymphatic and microvascular invasions than those with a tumor size ≥ 20 mm (12% and 17% vs 33% and 48%; P = 0.034 and 0.0073, respectively). In all patients, NET G2, tumor size ≥ 20 mm, local invasion T2-3, presence of lymph node metastasis, and presence of microvascular invasion were significant risk factors for shorter recurrence-free survival (RFS) (all P < 0.05). In patients with NET G1 and tumor size < 20 mm, five (10%), eight (16%), and four (8%) patients had lymphatic, microvascular, and perineural invasion. The presence of microvascular invasion was also an independent risk factor for RFS (P < 0.05).

Information on the frequency and role of lymphatic, microvascular, and perineural invasion based on tumor size and malignancy on recurrence may be useful when considering treatment strategies for small- and low-grade NF-PanNENs.

Despite the well-known prognostic role of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in pNETs, less is known about the importance of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) among patients with these tumors.

Patients undergoing pancreatectomy for pNET between 2002 and 2020 were identified in the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group database. Cox regression analysis was utilized to identify the impact of LVI on recurrence-free survival (RFS) among patients with node-negative pNET.

Among 853 patients who underwent resection for pNET, 214 patients (25.1%) had LNM, while 116 (13.6%) and 523 individuals (61.3%) were LVI + N0 and LVI - N0, respectively. The overall incidence of LVI among patients with N0 pNET was 18.1%; the incidence of LVI increased with increasing tumor size and Ki-67 levels (size < 2 cm and Ki-67 < 3%: 5.5%; size < 2 cm and Ki-67 ≥ 3%: 17.2%; size ≥ 2 cm and Ki-67 < 3%: 22.2%; size ≥ 2 cm and Ki-67 ≥ 3%: 43.1%, p < 0.001). Five-year RFS was highest among patients with LVI - N0 disease followed by individuals with LVI + N0 and N+ pNETs (92.8% vs. 61.6% vs. 58.3%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, the presence of LVI on pathology remained independently associated with almost 2.5 times higher hazards of recurrence (HR 2.47, 05% CI 1.44-4.24) among individuals with N0 pNETs.

The incidence of LVI varied according to tumor size and Ki-67. LVI was associated with a higher likelihood of recurrence among individuals who underwent formal pancreatic resection for N0 pNETs. LVI is an important prognostic indicator among patients with node-negative pNETs.

Rectal neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are rare and associated with poorer prognoses compared to conventional adenocarcinomas. The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable rectal NECs remains uncertain. Herein, we present a case of rectal NEC successfully treated with postoperative chemotherapy using irinotecan plus cisplatin.

A 48-year-old woman with a history of endometrial cancer presented with an intramural rectal tumour detected on follow-up imaging. Colonoscopy revealed a 30 mm submucosal tumour, and laparoscopic low anterior resection was performed. Histopathological examination showed poorly differentiated atypical cells with solid growth patterns. Metastasis from the uterine cancer was ruled out due to histological differences between the primary uterine tumour and the rectal lesion, as well as the absence of hormone receptor immunohistochemical expression. Further immunohistochemical analysis revealed diffuse CD56 positivity, a high mitotic rate (> 20/10 high power fields) and a Ki-67 labelling index exceeding 70%. Based on these findings, a diagnosis of rectal NEC, T3N0M0, Stage IIB (UICC 8th edition), was established. Given the aggressive nature of the tumour evidenced by a high Ki-67 labelling index, adjuvant chemotherapy comprising six cycles of irinotecan plus cisplatin was administered to mitigate the risk of recurrence. At the 3-year follow-up, the patient was free of disease recurrence.

This case highlights the importance of multidisciplinary surgical interventions followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in managing rectal NECs.

Chemotherapy has limited efficacy in advanced digestive high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (HG-NEN) and prognosis is dismal. Predictive markers for palliative chemotherapy are lacking, and prognostic markers are limited.

Digestive HG-NEN patients (n = 229) were prospectively included 2013-2017. Pathological re-assessment revealed 188 neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) and 41 neuroendocrine tumours (NET G3). Tumour-DNA was sequenced across 360 cancer-related genes, assessing mutations (mut) and copy number alterations. We linked sequencing results to clinical information and explored potential markers for first-line chemotherapy efficacy and survival.

In NEC given cis/carboplatin and etoposide (PE), TP53mut predicted inferior response rate in multivariate analyses (p = 0.009) and no BRAFmut NEC showed response. In overall assessment of PE-treated NEC, no genetic alterations were prognostic for OS. For small-cell NEC, TP53mut were associated with longer OS (p = 0.011) and RB1 deletions predicted lack of immediate-progression (p = 0.003). In non-small cell NEC, APC mut were associated with immediate-progression and shorter PFS (p = 0.008/p = 0.004). For NET G3, ATRXmut, ARID1A- and ERS1 deletions were associated with shorter PFS.

Correlations between genetic alterations and response/immediate-progression to PE were frequent in NEC but affected PFS or OS only when subdividing for cell-type. The classification of digestive NEC into large- and small-cell seems therefore molecularly and clinically relevant.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) arise from the body's diffuse endocrine system. Coexisting primary adenocarcinoma of the colon and NETs of the duodenum (D-NETs) is a rare occurrence in clinical practice. The classification and treatment criteria for D-NETs combined with a second primary cancer have not yet been determined.

We report the details of a case involving female patient with coexisting primary adenocarcinoma of the colon and a D-NET diagnosed by imaging and surgical specimens. The tumors were treated by surgery and four courses of chemotherapy. The patient achieved a favorable clinical prognosis.

Coexisting primary adenocarcinoma of the colon and D-NET were diagnosed by imaging, laboratory indicators, and surgical specimens. Surgical resection combined with chemotherapy was a safe, clinically effective, and cost-effective treatment.

Gastrointestinal large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (GILCNEC) has a low incidence but high malignancy and poor prognosis. The main purpose of this study was to thoroughly investigate its clinicopathological features, survival and prognostic factors.

Information on patients with GILCNEC was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result program, and prognostic factors were analyzed by analyzing clinicopathological data and survival functions. Finally, multivariate analysis was applied to identify independent risk factors associated with survival.

A total of 531 individuals were screened in our study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result database. The primary sites are mainly from the following: esophagus in 39 (7.3%) patients, stomach in 72 (13.6%) patients, hepatobiliary in 51 (9.6%) patients, pancreas in 97 (18.3%) patients, small intestines in 27 (5.1%), and colorectum in 245 (46.1%) patients. Esophagus, stomach, pancreas, and colorectum large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) were more common in males ( P = 0.001). Esophagus LCNEC had inferior overall survival (OS), whereas small intestine LCNEC was associated with better OS. The results of multivariate analysis showed that the American Joint Committee on Cancer Sixth Edition stage, surgery, and radiotherapy were independent prognostic indicators of OS in patients with GILCNEC ( P < 0.05).

The prognosis of patients with GILCNEC varies depending on the primary tumor site. American Joint Committee on Cancer Sixth Edition stage, surgery, and radiotherapy are independent prognostic factors of patients with GILCNEC. Although surgery and radiotherapy can prolong the survival of patients with GILCNEC, their prognosis remains poor, and further prospectively designed multicenter clinical studies are needed to indicate the decision for clinicians.

A 74-year-old man with obstructive jaundice presented with a thickened distal bile duct wall. A transpapillary forceps biopsy revealed an adenocarcinoma; however, because the tumor image was different from that of a typical cholangiocarcinoma, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration was performed on the tumor and enlarged lymph nodes. The tumor cells were positive for synaptophysin and CD56 with a Ki67 labeling index of 95%, and he was diagnosed with small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. We diagnosed a bile duct tumor with neuroendocrine carcinoma component with lymph node metastasis. Preoperative chemotherapy for neuroendocrine carcinoma was administered because R0 resection was difficult and the risk of postoperative recurrence was high. Three courses of chemotherapy with carboplatin and etoposide resulted in marked tumor shrinkage, and radical resection was performed 3 months after diagnosis. Postoperative pathology revealed adenocarcinoma in the mucosal epithelium and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma in the submucosa, most of which resolved with chemotherapy. Carboplatin and etoposide were resumed as adjuvant chemotherapy, and 67 months of recurrence-free survival were achieved after surgery.

Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is an autosomal dominant disorder marked by pathogenic variants in the MEN1 tumor suppressor gene, leading to tumors in the parathyroid glands, pancreas, and pituitary. The occurrence of ACTH-producing pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma is exceedingly rare in MEN1.

This report details a Colombian family harboring a novel MEN1 variant identified through genetic screening initiated by the index case. Affected family members exhibited primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) symptoms from their 20s to 50s. Uniquely, the index case developed an ACTH-secreting pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma, a rarity in MEN1 syndromes. Proactive screening enabled the early detection of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) as microadenomas in two carriers, with subsequent surgical or pharmacological intervention based on the clinical presentation.

Our findings underscore the significance of cascade screening in facilitating the early diagnosis and individualized treatment of MEN1, contributing to better patient outcomes. Additionally, this study brings to light a novel presentation of ACTH-producing pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma within the MEN1 spectrum, expanding our understanding of the disease's manifestations.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are rare malignancies that contain neural and endocrine cells with a median age of diagnosis of 63 years. NETs are typically located in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, the pancreas, or the lungs. Within the GI tract, the most common locations for NETs are the small bowel, appendix, or rectum. They are often asymptomatic and found incidentally on imaging or during procedures. NETs arising from the left side of the colon are very uncommon. While most NETs are well-differentiated by histology and are slow growing, 7% are poorly differentiated and usually progress rapidly. While rare, it is vital to be vigilant for this reason We present such a case of poorly differentiated metastatic NET of the sigmoid colon in a young active duty service member.

Poorly differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (pNECs) are rare, highly aggressive neoplasms. Frequently metastatic at diagnosis, prognosis is poor with median overall survival estimated to be less than 1 year. Although multidisciplinary management, including systemic medications and locoregional therapies aimed at reducing and preventing symptoms caused by mass effect, is the mainstay of treatment for patients with metastatic well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, rapid progression, organ dysfunction, and poor performance status often preclude initiation of even single-modality palliative chemotherapy for patients with metastatic pNEC, limiting the use of and recommendation for multidisciplinary management.We describe the case of a 51-year-old male patient diagnosed with pNEC metastatic to liver and lymph nodes presenting with impending cholestatic liver failure for whom we were able to successfully initiate and dose-escalate cytotoxic chemotherapy with excellent radiographic response. After multidisciplinary review of his case, the patient underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and hepatic wedge biopsies, with pathology demonstrating a pathologic complete response to chemotherapy in both the pancreas and liver. Surveillance scans at 2 years from initial diagnosis and 1 year from surgery remain without evidence of locoregional or distant recurrence, highlighting the importance and utility of multidisciplinary management in select cases.

The incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has gradually increased over the past few decades with the majority of patients presenting with metastases on initial presentation. The liver is the most common site of initial metastatic disease, and the presence of liver metastasis is an independent prognostic factor associated with a negative outcome. Because NENs are heterogenous neoplasms with variable differentiation, grading, and risk of grade transformation over time, accurate diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine liver lesions are both important and challenging. This is particularly so with the multiple liver-directed treatment options available. In this review article, we discuss the diagnosis, treatment, and response evaluation of NEN liver metastases.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) constitutes a rare subset of highly undifferentiated malignancies known for their aggressive nature. Although these tumors commonly originate in the lungs and gastrointestinal tract, their potential occurrence is not restricted to specific anatomical sites, giving rise to a variety of symptoms. Notably, cases of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with an unidentified primary source exhibit a graver prognosis and shorter survival periods compared to those with clearly identified origins. NETs frequently demonstrate a propensity to metastasize, spreading to diverse anatomical regions such as the liver, lungs, lymph nodes, and bones, illustrating their aggressive nature and the complexity of their management. In this context, we present the case of a 59-year-old male who sought medical attention in the emergency department due to right upper quadrant (RUQ) abdominal pain. Initial diagnostic assessments revealed significantly elevated liver function tests and severe hypercalcemia. A right upper quadrant ultrasound (RUQ US) was subsequently performed, which revealed heterogeneous hepatic echotexture with innumerable echogenic masses, suggesting a metastatic process. A computed tomography (CT) scan was then ordered to evaluate further the RUQ US findings, which showed numerous hypovascular liver masses, raising concerns of malignancy. A liver biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of LCNEC with an unidentified primary source.

Small bowel neuroendocrine tumours often present with locally advanced or metastatic disease. The aim of this paper is to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding (controversial) topics in the surgical management of advanced small bowel neuroendocrine tumours.

A working group of experts was formed by the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons. The group addressed 11 clinically relevant questions regarding surgery for advanced disease, including the benefit of primary tumour resection, the role of cytoreduction, the extent of lymph node clearance, and the management of an unknown primary tumour. A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE to identify papers addressing the research questions. Final recommendations were presented and voted upon by European Society of Endocrine Surgeons members at the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons Conference in Mainz in 2023.

The literature review yielded 1223 papers, of which 84 were included. There were no randomized controlled trials to address any of the research questions and therefore conclusions were based on the available case series, cohort studies, and systematic reviews/meta-analyses of the available non-randomized studies. The proposed recommendations were scored by 38-51 members and rated 'strongly agree' or 'agree' by 64-96% of participants.

This paper provides recommendations based on the best available evidence and expert opinion on the surgical management of locally advanced and metastatic small bowel neuroendocrine tumours.

Insulinomas are hormone-producing pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with an estimated incidence of 1 to 4 cases per million per year. Extrapancreatic insulinomas are extremely rare. Most insulinomas present with the Whipple triad: (1) symptoms, signs, or both consistent with hypoglycemia; (2) a low plasma glucose measured at the time of the symptoms and signs; and (3) relief of symptoms and signs when the glucose is raised to normal. Nonmetastatic insulinomas are nowadays referred to as "indolent" and metastatic insulinomas as "aggressive." The 5-year survival of patients with an indolent insulinoma has been reported to be 94% to 100%; for patients with an aggressive insulinoma, this amounts to 24% to 67%. Five percent to 10% of insulinomas are associated with the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome. Localization of the insulinoma and exclusion or confirmation of metastatic disease by computed tomography is followed by endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging for indolent, localized insulinomas. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography or positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging is a highly sensitive localization technique for seemingly occult, indolent, localized insulinomas. Supportive measures and somatostatin receptor ligands can be used for to control hypoglycemia. For single solitary insulinomas, curative surgical excision remains the treatment of choice. In aggressive malignant cases, debulking procedures, somatostatin receptor ligands, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, everolimus, sunitinib, and cytotoxic chemotherapy can be valuable options.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare tumours that develop from neuroendocrine cells in various parts of the body. The management of this disease poses a significant challenge because of the heterogeneous clinical presentation and varying degrees of aggressiveness. A multidisciplinary approach is often required in complex clinical situations. Radiotherapy (RT) plays a key role in managing NETs in both curative and palliative settings.

In this review, we summarize and discuss recent developments in the field of advanced RT in early-stage, locally advanced, and metastatic NENs. We highlight limitations in current approaches and discuss future potential treatment strategies for patients with NENs.

There are no therapeutic predictive biomarkers or representative preclinical models for high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN), a highly aggressive, fatal, and heterogeneous malignancy. We established patient-derived (PD) tumoroids from biobanked tissue samples of advanced high-grade GEP-NEN patients and applied this model for targeted rapid ex vivo pharmacotyping, next-generation sequencing, and perturbational profiling. We used tissue-matched PD tumoroids to profile individual patients, compared ex vivo drug response to patients' clinical response to chemotherapy, and investigated treatment-induced adaptive stress responses.PD tumoroids recapitulated biological key features of high-grade GEP-NEN and mimicked clinical response to cisplatin and temozolomide ex vivo. When we investigated treatment-induced adaptive stress responses in PD tumoroids in silico, we discovered and functionally validated Lysine demethylase 5 A and interferon-beta, which act synergistically in combination with cisplatin. Since ex vivo drug response in PD tumoroids matched clinical patient responses to standard-of-care chemotherapeutics for GEP-NEN, our rapid and functional precision oncology approach could expand personalized therapeutic options for patients with advanced high-grade GEP-NEN.

Thymic carcinoid tumours, especially in the context of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1), present significant clinical challenges due to their rarity and aggressive nature. This case report describes a complex patient with MEN 1, who suffered from multiple manifestations of the disease, including thymic carcinoid. The tumour was initially resected and treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. Due to slow progression over the years, the tumour was treated with two lines of chemotherapy before the patient succumbed to progressive disease. There is currently limited evidence favoring any specific medical treatment for thymic carcinoid.

Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are rare malignant neoplasms with aggressive behavior. The diagnosis remains challenging due to ever-changing terminologies and morphologic overlaps with other disease entities. Herein, we seek to better define anorectal NECs by high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) status and molecular profiling. Fourteen cases, including 3 men and 11 women with a median age of 63 years, were included. High-risk HPV RNA in situ hybridization was diffusely positive (+) in 7 cases, focal rarely positive (+/-) in 2 cases, and completely negative (-) in 5 cases. By morphology, all HPV(-) NECs were large-cell type, 3 mixed with a tubular adenoma/dysplasia or invasive adenocarcinoma. HPV-related (+ or +/-) NECs were mostly small-cell type, 3 mixed with squamous dysplasia and/or squamous cell carcinoma. Immunohistochemically, all NECs were positive for at least 2 neuroendocrine markers. The HPV(-) NECs were also positive for CDX2, whereas all HPV-related NECs were negative or only focally positive for CDX2, p40, and p63. Overexpression of p53 was found in 3 HPV(-) and 2 HPV(+/-) NECs but not in any HPV(+) NECs. Molecular analysis revealed MYC gene amplification in 4 cases: 2 HPV(-), 1 HPV(+/-), and 1 HPV(+). This was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization in all but 1 HPV(-) NEC, which showed polysomy 8 but no true MYC amplification. Interestingly, only 2 of the 4 MYC amplification-bearing cases, both p53 normal/wild-type, expressed c-Myc protein by immunohistochemistry. The other 2 cases, both p53 overexpressed, did not show c-Myc expression despite true MYC amplification. Our study demonstrates that anorectal NECs arise in HPV-dependent or -independent pathways, with heterogeneous expression of other lineage markers and different molecular signatures. Expressions of p53 and c-Myc proteins appear to be mutually exclusive regardless of HPV status, likely mediating alternative mechanisms of NEC carcinogenesis.

Small cell cancer (SCC) is a neuroendocrine neoplasm, which is most frequently found in the lungs. Extrapulmonary location of SCC is rare and may involve 2.5-5% of SCCs. We present a case of a 31-year-old male patient with an extremely uncommon subglottic SCC. The patient was qualified for a radical sequential chemoradiotherapy. After treatment, patient's condition suggested complete remission. Recurrence was detected one year later, and the disease rapidly progressed, despite a second line chemotherapy. The patient died 29 months after initial diagnosis. This case aims to raise awareness on the aggressive laryngeal SCC and its good response to first line chemotherapy composed of cisplatin and etoposide, followed by radiotherapy.

A man in his 70s presented with painless bilateral eyelid oedema and vertical diplopia. Evaluation showed a restrictive pattern of extraocular motility testing with MRI demonstrating significant enlargement of the right superior rectus and left superior oblique muscles along with right orbital fat stranding. Subsequent right orbital biopsy revealed poorly differentiated high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma without a systemic primary site on further diagnostic workup. The patient was treated with carboplatin and etoposide and passed away from an infection a month after diagnosis. This case along with a review of other published cases highlights the varied presentation of orbital neuroendocrine carcinomas that may mimic a broad differential of orbital processes, thus requiring careful diagnostic workup. Subsequently, additional considerations in metastatic evaluation should be based on tumour histological features.

High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms are a rare disease entity and account for approximately 10% of all neuroendocrine neoplasms. Because of their rarity, there is an overall lack of prospectively collected data available to advise practitioners as to how best to manage these patients. As a result, best practices are largely based on expert opinion. Recently, a distinction was made between well-differentiated high-grade (G3) neuroendocrine tumors and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, and with this, pathologic details, appropriate imaging practices and treatment have become more complex. In an effort to provide practitioners with the best guidance for the management of patients with high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, and gynecologic system, the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society convened a panel of experts to develop a set of recommendations and a treatment algorithm that may be used by practitioners for the care of these patients. Here, we provide consensus recommendations from the panel on pathology, imaging practices, management of localized disease, management of metastatic disease and surveillance and draw key distinctions as to the approach that should be utilized in patients with well-differentiated G3 neuroendocrine tumors vs poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas.

To date, single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy has proven to be ineffective against biomarker-unselected extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (EP-PDNECs). The efficacy of CPI in combination with chemotherapy remains under investigation.

Patients with advanced, progressive EP-PDNECs were enrolled in a two-part study of pembrolizumab-based therapy. In Part A, patients received pembrolizumab alone. In Part B, patients received pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy.

objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints: safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Tumours were profiled for programmed death-ligand 1 expression, microsatellite-high/mismatch repair deficient status, mutational burden (TMB), genomic correlates. Tumour growth rate was evaluated.

Part A (N = 14): ORR (pembrolizumab alone) 7% (95% CI, 0.2-33.9%), median PFS 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.7-21.4), median OS 7.8 months (95% CI, 3.1-not reached); 14% of patients (N = 2) had grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Part B (N = 22): ORR (pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy) 5% (95% CI, 0-22.8%), median PFS 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.9-3.4), median OS 4.8 months (95% CI, 4.1-8.2); 45% of patients (N = 10) had grade 3/4 TRAEs. The two patients with objective response had high-TMB tumours.

Treatment with pembrolizumab alone and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was ineffective in advanced, progressive EP-PDNECs.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03136055.

Primary urinary neuroendocrine neoplasms (U-NENs) are extremely rare thus optimal treatment is unknown. Grading and treatment are typically extrapolated from other primary sites. Since 2010, the clinical landscape for NENs has changed substantially. We performed a retrospective review of U-NENs to assess treatment patterns and oncologic outcomes of patients treated in the recent era of NEN therapy.

A multicenter retrospective review of patients diagnosed after 2005 and alive after 2010. Time to treatment failure (TTF) was used to evaluate progression and toxicity for systemic therapy. Tumors were categorized as having either well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (WDNET) or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (PDNEC) histology.

A total of 134 patients from 6 centers were included in our analysis, including 94 (70%) bladder, 32 (24%) kidney, 2 (1.5%) urethra and 4 other urinary primaries (3.0%). Poorly-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma was more common in bladder (92%) than non-bladder tumors (8%). Median Ki-67 available in bladder primary was 90% (n = 24), kidney 10% (n = 23), ureter 95% (n = 1), urethra 54% (n = 2), and others 90% (n = 3). Patients received a median of 2 therapies (range 0-10). Median time to death was not reached in locoregional WDNETs versus 8.2 years (95% CI, 3.5-noncalculable) in metastatic WDNETs (predominantly renal primary). Median time to death was 3.6 years (95% CI, 2.2-9.2) in locoregional PDNECs versus 1 year (95% CI, 0.8-1.3) in metastatic PDNECs (predominantly bladder primary).

This is the most extensive series examining treatment patterns in patients with U-NENs in the recent era of NEN therapy. The apparent inferior survival for bladder NENs is likely due to the preponderance of PDNECs in this group. As predicted, treatments for U-NENs mirrored that of other more common NENs. In our retrospective cohort, we observed that patients with WD-UNETs treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and everolimus suggested potential activity for disease control in WD-UNETs. Prospective studies are needed to assess the activity of new oncology drugs in UNENs.

This study aimed at assessing the impact of surgical treatments in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).

A propensity score-matched analysis based on data in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to assess the efficacy of surgical treatment in patients with GEP-NETs.

A total of 7515 patients diagnosed with GEP-NETs from 2004 to 2015 were evaluated from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. There were 1483 patients in the surgery group and 6032 patients in the nonsurgery group. Compared with patients in the surgery group, patients in the nonsurgery group were inclined to receive chemotherapy (50.8 vs. 16.7%) and radiation (12.9 vs. 3.7%) as treatment options. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed higher rates of overall survival (OS) outcomes for GEP-NETs patients who had been subjected to surgery (hazard ratio=0.483, 95% CI=0.439-0.533, P <0.001). Then, to reduce the impact of bias, a 1 : 1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed for the two groups of patients. A total of 1760 patients were assessed and each subgroup included 880 patients. In the matched population, the patients exhibited the ability to significantly benefit from surgery (hazard ratio=0.455, 95% CI=0.439-0.533, P <0.001). The OS outcomes for radiation or chemotherapy patients who had been treated with surgery were better than those of patients who had not been treated with surgery ( P <0.001). In addition, it was found that the OS of patients was not significant after rectum and small intestine surgery, whereas there was a significant difference in OS after colon, pancreas, and stomach surgery on the patients. Patients who had been subjected to surgery in the rectum and small intestines exhibited better therapeutic benefits.

Patients with GEP-NETs who are treated with surgery have better OS outcomes. Therefore, surgery is recommended for specified selected patients with metastatic GEP-NETs.

This investigation aims to assess the outcomes for second-line therapies to treat extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-NEC) after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

With IRB approval, we conducted a retrospective study of EP-NEC patients that progressed on first-line platinum chemotherapy from 2008 to 2018. Demographic data and treatment-related characteristics were collected and represented as descriptive statistics. The primary endpoints include overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). OS and PFS were estimated and stratified by site of primary (gastroenteropancreatic [GEP] versus non-GEP) and type of second-line therapy (irino/topotecan versus others). Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare survival distributions between groups.

Forty-seven patients met eligibility, with median age 65 (range 31-82), 62% male, and 83% White; 22 were GEP and 25 were non-GEP primary. Thirty patients (63.8%) received second-line therapy where 11 received irinotecan/topotecan (ir/to), while 19 received other agents (temozolomide, other platinum agents, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, pembrolizumab, and sunitinib). The median OS was 10.3 months in the ir/to group versus 13.4 months for other therapies, p = 0.10. The median PFS for ir/to therapy compared to other therapies was 2.0 months versus 1.8 months, respectively, p = 0.72. The OS and PFS with and without ir/to were not significantly different by the primary site (p = 0.61 and p = 0.21).

Many EP-NEC patients undergo second-line therapies. Interestingly, outcomes for ir/to-containing second-line therapies were not statistically different from other agents, regardless of the site of primary. With approval of new second-line therapies for small cell lung cancer, further research in therapeutic options is needed for this aggressive disease.

The survival benefit of chemotherapy for patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NECs) is well established. However, reasons for underutilization of chemotherapy are unknown.

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for metastatic GEP-NECs from 2009 to 2016. The cohort was stratified by patients who had received chemotherapy and who did not receive chemotherapy. Demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, and treatment characteristics were captured. Multivariable logistic regression examined factors associated with chemotherapy utilization.

Of the 2367 stage IV GEP-NECs patients identified, 1647 (69.6%) received chemotherapy. Patients with primary site at colon and small bowel, age ≥75, no insurance, and ≥2 comorbidities were less likely to receive chemotherapy than patients with other primary sites, age <75, private insurance, and no comorbidities (P < 0.005). The small bowel and colon were the primary sites with the greatest percentage of patients who received surgery (46.4% and 41.8%, respectively). In these subgroup of patients, surgical intervention was also associated with lower probability of receiving chemotherapy (odds ratio = 0.60, P < 0.005).

About 30% of patients with metastatic GEP-NECs did not receive chemotherapy. Primary site location and receipt of surgery were significantly associated with receipt of chemotherapy, with NECs in small bowel and colon being more likely to receive surgery and less likely to receive chemotherapy. While surgery may be considered on an individual basis, increasing efforts to ensure patients with colon or small bowel NECs receive guideline-concordant chemotherapy will positively impact survival. In addition, interventions to improve health insurance coverage to increase receipt of chemotherapy are warranted.

Small intestine cancer is rare, accounting for approximately 3% of all gastrointestinal malignancies. The most common histological subtypes include adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) and gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). In localised disease, surgery remains the mainstay of treatment and the best approach to improve survival. Current treatment for small intestine adenocarcinoma (SIA) is extrapolated from small studies and data from colorectal cancer (CRC). There is limited evidence to guide therapy in the adjuvant setting. However, there are small phase II studies in the advanced setting providing evidence for the role of chemotherapy and immunotherapy. There is also limited evidence assessing the efficacy of targeted therapies. Small intestine NETs are rare, with evidence for somatostatin analogue therapy, particularly in the low to intermediate-grade well-differentiated tumours. Poorly differentiated NETs are generally managed with chemotherapy but have worse outcomes compared with well-differentiated NETs. The management of small intestine GISTs is largely targeting KIT mutations with imatinib. Recent trials have provided evidence for effective therapies in imatinib-resistant tumours and the potential role of immunotherapy. The aim of this article was to review the evidence for the current management and recent advances in the management of small intestine adenocarcinoma, NETs and GISTs.

The role of primary tumor resection (PTR) in the survival of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (GI-NEC) patients with liver metastases only remains poorly defined. Therefore, we investigated the impact of PTR on the survival of GI-NEC patients with nonresected liver metastases.

GI-NEC patients with a liver-confined metastatic disease diagnosed between 2016 and 2018 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Multiple imputations by chained equations were used to account for missing data, and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to eliminate selection bias. Overall survival (OS) was compared by adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test with IPTW.

A total of 767 GI-NEC patients with nonresected liver metastases were identified. Among all patients, 177 (23.1%) received PTR and had a significantly favorable OS before (median: 43.6 months [interquartile range, IQR, 10.3-64.4] vs. 8.8 months [IQR, 2.1-23.1], p < 0.001 in log-rank test) and after (median: 25.7 months [IQR, 10.0-64.4] vs. 9.3 months [IQR, 2.2-26.4], p < 0.001 in IPTW-adjusted log-rank test) the IPTW adjustment. Additionally, this survival advantage persisted in an adjusted Cox model (IPTW adjusted hazard ratio = 0.431, 95% confidence interval: 0.332-0.560; p < 0.001). The improved survival persisted in subgroups stratified by primary tumor site, tumor grade, and N stage, even in the complete cohort (excluding patients with missing data).

PTR led to improved survival for GI-NEC patients with nonresected liver metastases regardless of primary tumor site, tumor grade, and N stage. However, the decision for PTR should be made on an individualized basis following multidisciplinary evaluation.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NEC) are rare and have a poor prognosis. Most GEP-NEC are diagnosed with metastatic disease, with only minor biopsies available for molecular diagnostics. We assessed the applicability of liquid biopsies for molecular profiling of GEP-NEC.

We performed massive parallel sequencing of 76 cancer-related genes in circulating tumor DNA from 50 patients with advanced GEP-NEC and compared findings to previous analyses of solid tumor biopsies from the same patients. Plasma samples were collected before therapy, and the median time span between blood and tissue sampling was 25 days.

We detected 178 somatic mutations in the liquid biopsies, 127 (71%) were also detected in the solid biopsies, whereas 51 (29%) were unique to the liquid biopsies. In the same 76 genes, we previously detected 199 somatic mutations (single nucleotide variants) in solid biopsies, of which 127 (64%) were also now detected in liquid biopsies. In exploratory subgroup assessments, concordance was higher in patients with liver metastases (P = 1.5 × 10^-5) and increasing with level of liver involvement (P = 1.2 × 10^-4). The concordance was similar between GEP-NEC with different primary sites, except being lower in esophageal cases (P = .001). Concordance was not associated with tumor mutation burden. Tumor tissue mutations also detected in liquid biopsies was lower for MSI (40%) versus MSS tumors (70%; P = 7.8 × 10^-4). We identified potentially targetable mutations in plasma of 26 (52%) of patients with GEP-NEC; nine patients (18%) had potentially targetable mutation detected only in liquid biopsies.

Liquid biopsy analyses may be an applicable alternative to solid biopsies in GEP-NEC. Liquid biopsies may add additional mutations compared with tumor biopsies alone and could be useful for biomarker assessment in clinical trials for these patients.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with increasing incidence and an ill-defined pathobiology. Although many PanNETs are indolent and remain stable for years, a subset may behave aggressively and metastasize widely. Thus, the increasing and frequent detection of PanNETs presents a treatment dilemma. Current prognostic systems are susceptible to interpretation errors, sampling issues, and do not accurately reflect the clinical behavior of these neoplasms. Hence, additional biomarkers are needed to improve the prognostic stratification of patients diagnosed with a PanNET. Recent studies have identified alterations in death domain-associated protein 6 (DAXX) and alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation X-linked (ATRX), as well as alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT), as promising prognostic biomarkers. This review summarizes the identification, clinical utility, and specific nuances in testing for DAXX/ATRX by immunohistochemistry and ALT by telomere-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization in PanNETs. Furthermore, a discussion on diagnostic indications for DAXX, ATRX, and ALT status is provided to include the distinction between PanNETs and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (PanNECs), and determining pancreatic origin for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors in the setting of an unknown primary.

We aimed to determine trends in incidence and survival in patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs) from 1977 to 2016, and then analyze the potential risk factors including sex, age, race, grade, Socioeconomic status (SES), site, and stage.

Data were obtained from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, relative survival rates (RSRs), and Cox proportional risk regression model were used to evaluate the relationship between these factors and prognosis.

Compared with other sites, the small intestine and rectum have the highest incidence, and the appendix and rectum had the highest survival rate. The incidence was higher in males than in females, and the survival rate in males was close to females. Blacks had a higher incidence rate than whites, but similar survival rates. Incidence and survival rates were lower for G3&4 than for G1 and G2. Age, stage, and grade are risk factors.

This study described changes in the incidence and survival rates of GI-NETs from 1977 to 2016 and performed risk factor analyses related to GI-NETs.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms are derived from the epithelial lineages mainly of respiratory tract, with predominant neuroendocrine differentiation. There are only a handful of documented cases of paranasal small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (SNEC) with primary orbital involvement. Here, the authors describe a 33-year-old male patient with rapidly progressive swelling of the right lower lid with proptosis since 4 weeks. On contrast-MRI orbit, an ill-defined multilobulated mass measuring 3.6 × 3.1 cm with intense homogenous enhancement was seen in the right retrobulbar space involving the right ethmoid sinus. On incisional biopsy, a poorly differentiated mass containing numerous small round blue cells and scanty intervening stroma with prominent necrosis and apoptosis was seen. Immunohistochemistry was strongly positive for synaptophysin. He was diagnosed as a case of SNEC and received chemotherapy, with good response till date of 9 months of follow up. The authors present a literature review and describe challenges in management of a primary orbital SNEC.

High-grade (grade 3) neuroendocrine neoplasms (G3 NENs) have poor survival outcomes. From a clinical standpoint, G3 NENs are usually grouped regardless of primary site and treated similarly. Little is known regarding the underlying genomics of these rare tumors, especially when compared across different primary sites. We performed whole transcriptome (n = 46), whole exome (n = 40), and gene copy number (n = 43) sequencing on G3 NEN formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples from diverse organs (in total, 17 were lung, 16 were gastroenteropancreatic, and 13 other). G3 NENs despite arising from diverse primary sites did not have gene expression profiles that were easily segregated by organ of origin. Across all G3 NENs, TP53, APC, RB1, and CDKN2A were significantly mutated. The CDK4/6 cell cycling pathway was mutated in 95% of cases, with upregulation of oncogenes within this pathway. G3 NENs had high tumor mutation burden (mean 7.09 mutations/MB), with 20% having >10 mutations/MB. Two somatic copy number alterations were significantly associated with worse prognosis across tissue types: focal deletion 22q13.31 (HR, 7.82; P = 0.034) and arm amplification 19q (HR, 4.82; P = 0.032). This study is among the most diverse genomic study of high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms. We uncovered genomic features previously unrecognized for this rapidly fatal and rare cancer type that could have potential prognostic and therapeutic implications.

The 8th tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) can be used to estimate the prognosis of gastric neuroendocrine tumor (gNET) and gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (gNEC) patients but not gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (gNENs).

First, in the SEER (training) dataset, a TNMG system was built by combining the WHO G grade (G1-4; NEC grouped into G4) with the 8th AJCC T (T1-4), N (N0-1), and M (M0-1) stage, which was then validated in a Chinese (validation) cohort.

In all, 2245 gNENs cases from the training dataset and 280 cases from the validation dataset were eligible. The T stage, M stage, and G grade were independent prognostic factors for OS in both datasets (all p < 0.05). The TNMG staging system demonstrated better C-index for predicting OS than the 8th AJCC TNM staging system in both the training (0.87, 95%CI: 0.86-0.88 vs. 0.79, 95%CI: 0.77-0.81) and validation (0.77, 95%CI: 0.73-0.80 vs. 0.75, 95%CI: 0.71-0.79) datasets. The AUC of the 3-year OS for the TNMG staging system was 0.936 and 0.817 in the SEER and validation dataset, respectively; higher than those of the 8th AJCC system (vs. 0.843 and 0.779, respectively). DCA revealed that compared with the 8th AJCC TNM staging system, the TNMG staging system demonstrated superior net prognostic benefit in both the training and validation datasets.

The proposed TNMG staging system could more accurately predict the 3- and 5-year OS rate of gNENs patients than the 8th AJCC TNM staging system.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with increasing incidence and an ill-defined pathobiology. Although many PanNETs are indolent and remain stable for years, a subset may behave aggressively and metastasize widely. Thus, the increasing and frequent detection of PanNETs presents a treatment dilemma. Current prognostic systems are susceptible to interpretation errors, sampling issues, and do not accurately reflect the clinical behavior of these neoplasms. Hence, additional biomarkers are needed to improve the prognostic stratification of patients diagnosed with a PanNET. Recent studies have identified alterations in death domain-associated protein 6 (DAXX) and alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation X-linked (ATRX), as well as alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT), as promising prognostic biomarkers. This review summarizes the identification, clinical utility, and specific nuances in testing for DAXX/ATRX by immunohistochemistry and ALT by telomere-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization in PanNETs. Furthermore, a discussion on diagnostic indications for DAXX, ATRX, and ALT status is provided to include the distinction between PanNETs and pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (PanNECs), and determining pancreatic origin for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors in the setting of an unknown primary.