1
|
Old O, Jankowski J, Attwood S, Stokes C, Kendall C, Rasdell C, Zimmermann A, Massa MS, Love S, Sanders S, Deidda M, Briggs A, Hapeshi J, Foy C, Moayyedi P, Barr H. Barrett's Oesophagus Surveillance Versus Endoscopy at Need Study (BOSS): A Randomized Controlled Trial. Gastroenterology 2025:S0016-5085(25)00587-6. [PMID: 40180292 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2025.03.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2024] [Revised: 01/27/2025] [Accepted: 03/07/2025] [Indexed: 04/05/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a precursor lesion for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Surveillance endoscopy aims to detect early malignant progression; although widely practiced, it has not previously been tested in a randomized trial. METHODS BOSS (Barrett's Oesophagus Surveillance Versus Endoscopy at Need Study) was a randomized controlled trial at 109 centers in the United Kingdom. Patients with BE were randomized to 2-yearly surveillance endoscopy or "at-need" endoscopy, offered for symptoms only. Follow-up was a minimum of 10 years. The primary outcome was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included cancer-specific survival, time to diagnosis of EAC, stage of EAC at diagnosis, frequency of endoscopy, and serious adverse events related to interventions. RESULTS There were 3453 patients recruited; 1733 patients were randomized to surveillance and 1719 to at-need endoscopy. Median follow-up time was 12.8 years for the primary outcome. There was no evidence of a difference in overall survival between the surveillance arm (333 deaths among 1733 patients) and the at-need arm (356 deaths among 1719 patients; hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.82-1.10; stratified log-rank P = .503). There was no evidence of a difference for surveillance vs at-need endoscopy in cancer-specific survival (108 vs 106 deaths from any cancer; hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.77-1.33; P = .926), time to diagnosis of EAC (40 vs 31 patients had a diagnosis of EAC; hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.82-2.11; P = .254), or cancer stage at diagnosis. Eight surveillance patients (0.46%) and 7 at-need patients (0.41%) reported serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Surveillance did not improve overall survival or cancer-specific survival. At-need endoscopy may be a safe alternative for low-risk patients. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT00987857.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Old
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, United Kingdom.
| | - Janusz Jankowski
- Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Attwood
- The Department of Health Services Research, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom
| | - Clive Stokes
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine Kendall
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, United Kingdom
| | - Cathryn Rasdell
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, United Kingdom
| | - Alex Zimmermann
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - M Sofia Massa
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sharon Love
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Scott Sanders
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, University of Warwick, Warwickshire, United Kingdom
| | - Manuela Deidda
- University of Glasgow, Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Briggs
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julie Hapeshi
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Foy
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Moayyedi
- Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hugh Barr
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gupta S, Mandarino FV, Shahidi N, Hourigan LF, Messmann H, Wallace MB, Repici A, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Haber GB, Taylor ACF, Waxman I, Siersema PD, Pouw RE, Lemmers A, Bisschops R, Mosko JD, Teshima C, Ragunath K, Rösch T, Pech O, Beyna T, Sharma P, Lee EYT, Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Can optical evaluation distinguish between T1a and T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma: an international expert interobserver agreement study. Endoscopy 2025; 57:200-207. [PMID: 39168143 DOI: 10.1055/a-2399-1401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an acceptable technique for T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma, but en bloc R0 excision is advocated for T1b disease as it may offer a potential cure and mitigate recurrence. Thus, distinguishing between T1a and T1b disease is imperative under current treatment paradigms. We investigated whether expert Barrett's endoscopists could make this distinction based on optical evaluation. METHODS Endoscopic images of histologically confirmed high grade dysplasia (HGD), T1a, and T1b disease (20 sets for each) were compiled from consecutive patients at a single institution. Each set contained four images including an overview, a close-up in high definition white light, a near-focus magnification image, and a narrow-band image. Experts predicted the histology for each set. RESULTS 19 experts from 8 countries (Australia, USA, Italy, Netherlands, Germany, Canada, Belgium, and Portugal) participated. The majority had been practicing for > 20 years, with a median (interquartile range) annual case volume of 50 (18-75) for Barrett's EMR and 25 (10-45) for Barrett's endoscopic submucosal dissection. Esophageal adenocarcinoma (T1a/b) could be distinguished from HGD with a pooled sensitivity of 89.1 % (95 %CI 84.7-93.4). T1b adenocarcinoma could be predicted with a pooled sensitivity of 43.8 % (95 %CI 29.9-57.7). Fleiss' kappa was 0.421 (95 %CI 0.399-0.442; P < 0.001), indicating fair-to-moderate agreement. CONCLUSIONS Expert Barrett's endoscopists could reliably differentiate T1a/T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma from HGD. Despite fair-to-moderate agreement for T staging, T1b disease could not be reliably distinguished from T1a disease. This may impact clinical decision making and selection of endoscopic techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunil Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Neal Shahidi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Helmut Messmann
- Department of Gastroenterology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital, Augsburg, Germany
| | | | - Alessandro Repici
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | - Irving Waxman
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Roos E Pouw
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Arnaud Lemmers
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Erasme, Belgium
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jeffrey D Mosko
- Therapeutic Endoscopy Centre, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Krish Ragunath
- Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
- Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Thomas Rösch
- University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Pech
- Department of Gastroenterology and Interventional Endoscopy, St. John of God Hospital, Teaching Hospital of the University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Torsten Beyna
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
| | - Eric Y T Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nicholas G Burgess
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huber T, Weber J, von Bechtolsheim F, Flemming S, Fuchs HF, Grade M, Hummel R, Krautz C, Stockheim J, Thomaschewski M, Wilhelm D, Kalff JC, Nickel F, Matthaei H. Modified Delphi Procedure to Achieve Consensus for the Concept of a National Curriculum for Minimally Invasive and Robot-assisted Surgery in Germany (GeRMIQ). Zentralbl Chir 2025; 150:35-49. [PMID: 39667398 PMCID: PMC11798644 DOI: 10.1055/a-2386-9463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 12/14/2024]
Abstract
The rapid development of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and robot-assisted surgery (RAS) requires standardized training to ensure high-quality patient care. In Germany, there is currently a lack of a standardized curriculum that teaches these specialized skills. The aim of this study is to find a consensus for the development of a nationwide curriculum for MIS and RAS with the subsequent implementation of the consented content.A modified Delphi process was used to reach consensus among national experts in MIS and RAS. The process included a literature review, an online survey and an expert conference.All 12 invited experts participated in the survey. They primarily achieved consensus on 73% and secondarily within the expert conference on 95 out of 122 questions (77.9%). The preference for a basic curriculum as a foundation on which specialized modules can build on was particularly clear. The results support the development of an integrated curriculum for MIS and RAS that includes step-by-step training from theoretical knowledge via e-learning modules to practical skills in dry lab simulations and in the OR. Emphasis was placed on the need to promote clinical judgment and decision making through targeted assessment during the learning curve to ensure effective application of learned skills in clinical practice. There was also a consensus that training content must be aligned with learners' skill acquisition using objective performance assessments in line with the principle of proficiency-based progression (PBP). The continuous updating of the curriculum to keep it up to date with the latest technology was considered essential.The study underlines the urgent need for a standardized training curriculum for MIS and RAS in Germany in order to increase patient safety and improve the quality of surgical care. There is broad expert consensus for the implementation of such a curriculum. It aims to ensure a contemporary and internationally competitive uniform quality of training and to increase the attractiveness of surgical training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Huber
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Julia Weber
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Felix von Bechtolsheim
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Sven Flemming
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
| | - Hans Friedrich Fuchs
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Tumorchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Marian Grade
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland
| | - Richard Hummel
- Klinik für Allgemeine Chirurgie, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Deutschland
| | - Christian Krautz
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Jessica Stockheim
- Universitätsklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland
| | - Michael Thomaschewski
- Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Dirk Wilhelm
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Technische Universität München, School of Medicine and Health, München, Deutschland
| | - Jörg C. Kalff
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| | - Felix Nickel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Hanno Matthaei
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Parasa S, Berzin T, Leggett C, Gross S, Repici A, Ahmad OF, Chiang A, Coelho-Prabhu N, Cohen J, Dekker E, Keswani RN, Kahn CE, Hassan C, Petrick N, Mountney P, Ng J, Riegler M, Mori Y, Saito Y, Thakkar S, Waxman I, Wallace MB, Sharma P. Consensus statements on the current landscape of artificial intelligence applications in endoscopy, addressing roadblocks, and advancing artificial intelligence in gastroenterology. Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 101:2-9.e1. [PMID: 38639679 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) AI Task Force along with experts in endoscopy, technology space, regulatory authorities, and other medical subspecialties initiated a consensus process that analyzed the current literature, highlighted potential areas, and outlined the necessary research in artificial intelligence (AI) to allow a clearer understanding of AI as it pertains to endoscopy currently. METHODS A modified Delphi process was used to develop these consensus statements. RESULTS Statement 1: Current advances in AI allow for the development of AI-based algorithms that can be applied to endoscopy to augment endoscopist performance in detection and characterization of endoscopic lesions. Statement 2: Computer vision-based algorithms provide opportunities to redefine quality metrics in endoscopy using AI, which can be standardized and can reduce subjectivity in reporting quality metrics. Natural language processing-based algorithms can help with the data abstraction needed for reporting current quality metrics in GI endoscopy effortlessly. Statement 3: AI technologies can support smart endoscopy suites, which may help optimize workflows in the endoscopy suite, including automated documentation. Statement 4: Using AI and machine learning helps in predictive modeling, diagnosis, and prognostication. High-quality data with multidimensionality are needed for risk prediction, prognostication of specific clinical conditions, and their outcomes when using machine learning methods. Statement 5: Big data and cloud-based tools can help advance clinical research in gastroenterology. Multimodal data are key to understanding the maximal extent of the disease state and unlocking treatment options. Statement 6: Understanding how to evaluate AI algorithms in the gastroenterology literature and clinical trials is important for gastroenterologists, trainees, and researchers, and hence education efforts by GI societies are needed. Statement 7: Several challenges regarding integrating AI solutions into the clinical practice of endoscopy exist, including understanding the role of human-AI interaction. Transparency, interpretability, and explainability of AI algorithms play a key role in their clinical adoption in GI endoscopy. Developing appropriate AI governance, data procurement, and tools needed for the AI lifecycle are critical for the successful implementation of AI into clinical practice. Statement 8: For payment of AI in endoscopy, a thorough evaluation of the potential value proposition for AI systems may help guide purchasing decisions in endoscopy. Reliable cost-effectiveness studies to guide reimbursement are needed. Statement 9: Relevant clinical outcomes and performance metrics for AI in gastroenterology are currently not well defined. To improve the quality and interpretability of research in the field, steps need to be taken to define these evidence standards. Statement 10: A balanced view of AI technologies and active collaboration between the medical technology industry, computer scientists, gastroenterologists, and researchers are critical for the meaningful advancement of AI in gastroenterology. CONCLUSIONS The consensus process led by the ASGE AI Task Force and experts from various disciplines has shed light on the potential of AI in endoscopy and gastroenterology. AI-based algorithms have shown promise in augmenting endoscopist performance, redefining quality metrics, optimizing workflows, and aiding in predictive modeling and diagnosis. However, challenges remain in evaluating AI algorithms, ensuring transparency and interpretability, addressing governance and data procurement, determining payment models, defining relevant clinical outcomes, and fostering collaboration between stakeholders. Addressing these challenges while maintaining a balanced perspective is crucial for the meaningful advancement of AI in gastroenterology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Seth Gross
- NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Austin Chiang
- Medtronic Gastrointestinal, Santa Clara, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Charles E Kahn
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicholas Petrick
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration
| | | | - Jonathan Ng
- Iterative Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | - Shyam Thakkar
- West Virginia University Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Irving Waxman
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Demont A, Vervaeke R, Bourmaud A. Required competencies for French physiotherapists for direct access to primary care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders: consensus statement based on a Delphi survey. Physiother Theory Pract 2024; 40:2976-2987. [PMID: 38189315 DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2023.2301437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physiotherapists who will practice in direct access model of care must acquire the required competencies to ensure adequate and safe patient care. There is no set of required competencies for French physiotherapists. OBJECTIVE To develop a consensus on a minimum set of competencies that French physiotherapists should acquire to practice in direct access to primary care with patients with musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS The survey was conducted by 1) definition of an initial set of competencies based on a scoping review up to September 2021, 2) implementation of a two-round Delphi survey from October 2021 to January 2022 to obtain consensus on the domains and competencies required in the French context, and 3) consultation at group meeting on February 2022 to finalize and validate the final set of competencies. RESULTS Five domains and 52 competencies were identified from the scoping review. Twenty health-care professionals' experts (i.e. family physicians, emergency physicians, and physiotherapists) and two health-care users took part in the Delphi survey. A consensus was reached on 27 required competencies grouped within five domains. CONCLUSION A consensus-based, contemporary set of competencies required for direct access practice with patients with musculoskeletal disorders has been identified that may contribute to the update of entry-level and lifelong learning curricula for French physiotherapists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Demont
- Centre de Recherche Épidémiologique et Statistique Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM UMR-S 1153, Paris, France
| | - Robin Vervaeke
- Physiotherapy Department, Physiotherapy Clinic, Mulhouse, France
| | - Aurélie Bourmaud
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Robert Debré university hospital, AP-HP, INSERM CIC 1426 and Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen F, Li H, Liang X, Liu T. Use of the Delphi Method in the Construction of the Temperature Chain Management Scheme for Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Urological Surgical Patients. Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag 2024. [PMID: 39552416 DOI: 10.1089/ther.2024.0048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2024] Open
Abstract
The study aimed to construct a temperature chain management scheme in patients undergoing Da Vinci Robot-assisted surgery in urological surgical patients by the Delphi method, providing a reference for the prevention and treatment of the inadvertent perioperative hypothermia. First, instructing by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Evidence-Based Healthcare model and systematically reviewing literature related to the prevention and treatment of perioperative hypothermia in Da Vinci robot-assisted surgery patients in the urological surgical patients from guideline-related websites and professional association websites. Second, carrying out the qualitative interviews, which were conducted with medical staff in the urology department and the Da Vinci robot-assisted surgery team in a teaching hospital. Third, a temperature chain management scheme draft was obtained by a panel meeting. Finally, using the Delphi method to evaluate the draft, demonstrating its scientificity and feasibility, and obtaining the final scheme. The temperature chain management scheme constructed by a Delphi method, embraced seven links from preoperative ward, preoperative transfer, anesthesia waiting room, operating room, postanesthesia recovery room, postoperative transfer, and postoperative ward. The enthusiasm degree of both rounds of expert consultation was 100%, with expert authority levels of 0.875 and 0.888, respectively, indicating good representativeness and authority. Kendall's coefficient in two rounds was 0.220 and 0.400, respectively, indicating a trend toward consensus among experts, which indicated the scheme had a high degree of credibility and feasibility. The temperature chain management scheme for Da Vinci robot-assisted surgery patients in the urology department, constructed by the Delphi method, is both scientific and feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fengxia Chen
- Nursing School, Sanquan College of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China
| | - Huiying Li
- Operating Room, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Xin Liang
- Operating Room, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Tiantian Liu
- Operating Room, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Eltahir Z, Eisa AA, Keayta MH, Aljhani YA, Alfaroqui O, Jenkins GJ. Microenvironment and Biomarkers in Esophageal Cancers: An Approach for Early Detection and Identification. Cureus 2024; 16:e74242. [PMID: 39717344 PMCID: PMC11663622 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.74242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/22/2024] [Indexed: 12/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Esophageal cancer is a prevalent and highly lethal malignancy worldwide, comprising two main subtypes: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). While both subtypes are frequently encountered, ESCC has historically been more common globally. However, in recent decades, EAC has emerged as the predominant type in industrialized nations, often developing from Barrett's esophagus, a condition driven by chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). ESCC typically occurs in the upper esophagus, whereas EAC arises near the lower gastroesophageal junction. The etiology of esophageal cancer is multifactorial, with diverse causes and clinical management strategies. Notably, diagnosing tumors located in the lower esophagus presents significant challenges. EAC is particularly prone to diagnostic errors, as it can be mistaken for ESCC. This study aims to investigate potential histological biomarkers for EAC to facilitate early and accurate identification of histological changes, especially in patients with GERD. Methods This cross-sectional study examined archival histological samples from patients with lower esophageal abnormalities. Immunohistochemistry was used to investigate the P63 marker, while Masson's trichrome stain was employed to evaluate cancer progression and associated microenvironmental changes. Results A total of 104 cases were analyzed, including 13 with known P63-positive staining and five P63-negative controls. The remaining cases consisted of both precancerous and cancerous tissues diagnosed as EAC. Among these, 86 cases showed negative P63 staining, confirming their origin from non-squamous cells and supporting their classification as true Barrett's-related epithelium. In contrast, five of the 13 SCC control cases exhibited P63 positivity, demonstrating a highly significant association (p < 0.00001). Additionally, Masson's trichrome staining revealed stromal collagen fibers infiltrating the malignant tissue areas. Conclusions This study highlights the significance of the P63 marker in distinguishing between ESCC and EAC. It also suggests a potential role for Masson's trichrome stain in identifying early microenvironmental changes associated with EAC progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zakaria Eltahir
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Taibah University, Medina, SAU
- College of Medicine, Translation Clinical Trials Unit, Taibah University, Medina, SAU
| | - Alaa A Eisa
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taibah University, Medina, SAU
| | - Mohamed H Keayta
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Taibah University, Medina, SAU
| | - Yousif A Aljhani
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Taibah University, Medina, SAU
| | - Omar Alfaroqui
- Department of Histopathology, King Fahad Hospital, Medina, SAU
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Authors, Collaborators. S2k guideline Gastroesophageal reflux disease and eosinophilic esophagitis of the German Society of Gastroenterology, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS). ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:1786-1852. [PMID: 39389106 DOI: 10.1055/a-2344-6282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/12/2024]
|
9
|
Straum S, Wollan K, Rekstad LC, Fossmark R. Esophageal cancers missed at upper endoscopy in Central Norway 2004 to 2021 - A population-based study. BMC Gastroenterol 2024; 24:279. [PMID: 39169296 PMCID: PMC11337653 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03371-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence of esophageal cancers is increasing in many Western countries and the rate of missed esophageal cancers (MEC) at upper endoscopy is of concern. We aimed to calculate the MEC rate and identify factors associated with MEC. METHODS This was a retrospective population-based cohort study including 613 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer in Central Norway 2004-2021. MEC was defined as esophageal cancer diagnosed 6-36 months after a non-diagnostic upper endoscopy. Patient characteristics, tumor localization, histological type and cTNM stage were recorded. Symptoms, endoscopic findings, use of sedation and endoscopists experience at the endoscopy prior to esophageal cancer diagnosis and at the time of diagnosis were recorded. The association between these factors and MEC was assessed. RESULTS Forty-nine (8.0%) of 613 cancers were MEC. There was a significant increase in annual numbers of esophageal cancer (p < 0.001) as well as of MEC (p = 0.009), but MEC rate did not change significantly (p = 0.382). The median time from prior upper endoscopy to MEC diagnosis was 22.9 (12.1-28.6) months. MEC patients were older and were diagnosed with disease with a lower cTNM stage and cT category than non-missed cancers, whereas tumor localization and histological type were similar between the groups. The use of sedation or endoscopist experience did not differ between the endoscopy prior to esophageal cancer diagnosis and at the time of diagnosis. High proportions of MEC patients had Barrett's esophagus (n = 25, 51.0%), hiatus hernia (n = 26, 53.1%), esophagitis (n = 10, 20.4%) or ulceration (n = 4, 8.2%). Significant proportions of MECs were diagnosed after inappropriate follow-up of endoscopic Barrett's esophagus, histological dysplasia or ulcerations. CONCLUSIONS The annual number of MEC increased during the study period, while the MEC rate remained unchanged. Endoscopic findings related to gastroesophageal reflux disease such as esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus were identified in a high proportion of patients with subsequent MECs. Cautious follow-up of these patients could potentially reduce MEC-rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Synne Straum
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Karoline Wollan
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Lars Cato Rekstad
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, St Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Reidar Fossmark
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ebert MP, Fischbach W, Hollerbach S, Höppner J, Lorenz D, Stahl M, Stuschke M, Pech O, Vanhoefer U, Porschen R. S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie der Plattenepithelkarzinome und Adenokarzinome des Ösophagus. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:535-642. [PMID: 38599580 DOI: 10.1055/a-2239-9802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias P Ebert
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universitätsmedizin, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim
- DKFZ-Hector Krebsinstitut an der Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim
- Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit, EMBL, Heidelberg
| | - Wolfgang Fischbach
- Deutsche Gesellschaft zur Bekämpfung der Krankheiten von Magen, Darm und Leber sowie von Störungen des Stoffwechsels und der Ernährung (Gastro-Liga) e. V., Giessen
| | | | - Jens Höppner
- Klinik für Allgemeine Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck
| | - Dietmar Lorenz
- Chirurgische Klinik I, Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum Darmstadt, Darmstadt
| | - Michael Stahl
- Klinik für Internistische Onkologie und onkologische Palliativmedizin, Evang. Huyssensstiftung, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen
| | - Martin Stuschke
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen
| | - Oliver Pech
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie und Interventionelle Endoskopie, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg
| | - Udo Vanhoefer
- Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Katholisches Marienkrankenhaus, Hamburg
| | - Rainer Porschen
- Gastroenterologische Praxis am Kreiskrankenhaus Osterholz, Osterholz-Scharmbeck
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kim SE, Schlottmann F, Masrur MA. Management of Long-Segment Barrett's Esophagus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2023; 33:1201-1210. [PMID: 37796531 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common gastrointestinal disorder with one of its most feared complications being Barrett's esophagus (BE). Currently, most of the recommendations of BE management are driven by the level of dysplasia. However, the length of BE might also be related to the risk of dysplasia/malignant transformation. We aimed to determine the appropriate management of BE based on its length. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted with searches made on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Long-segment BE (LSBE) was defined as 3 cm or longer and short-segment BE (SSBE) as under 3 cm. Studies evaluating the behavior and management of SSBE and/or LSBE were included for analysis. Results: LSBE have greater risk of dysplasia or progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma compared to SSBE. Despite this greater risk, LSBE and SSBE are currently managed similarly based on the presence and degree of dysplasia. Endoscopic and ablative techniques may have higher level of success and less complications in SSBE, compared to LSBE. Decreasing time interval between surveillance may be a viable option for managing LSBE. Conclusions: Although many algorithms of monitoring and treatment of BE remain the same regardless of segment length, current evidence suggests that more aggressive management for LSBE might be needed due to its higher risk of malignant progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Kim
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Francisco Schlottmann
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Mario A Masrur
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Roggenbuck J, Eubank BHF, Wright J, Harms MB, Kolb SJ. Evidence-based consensus guidelines for ALS genetic testing and counseling. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2023; 10:2074-2091. [PMID: 37691292 PMCID: PMC10646996 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Advances in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) gene discovery, ongoing gene therapy trials, and patient demand have driven increased use of ALS genetic testing. Despite this progress, the offer of genetic testing to persons with ALS is not yet "standard of care." Our primary goal is to develop clinical ALS genetic counseling and testing guidelines to improve and standardize genetic counseling and testing practice among neurologists, genetic counselors or any provider caring for persons with ALS. METHODS Core clinical questions were identified and a rapid review performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-P) 2015 method. Guideline recommendations were drafted and the strength of evidence for each recommendation was assessed by combining two systems: the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) System and the Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP). A modified Delphi approach was used to reach consensus among a group of content experts for each guideline statement. RESULTS A total of 35 guideline statements were developed. In summary, all persons with ALS should be offered single-step genetic testing, consisting of a C9orf72 assay, along with sequencing of SOD1, FUS, and TARDBP, at a minimum. The key education and genetic risk assessments that should be provided before and after testing are delineated. Specific guidance regarding testing methods and reporting for C9orf72 and other genes is provided for commercial laboratories. INTERPRETATION These evidence-based, consensus guidelines will support all stakeholders in the ALS community in navigating benefits and challenges of genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Roggenbuck
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal MedicineThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical CenterColumbusOhioUSA
- Department of NeurologyThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Breda H. F. Eubank
- Health & Physical Education Department, Faculty of Health, Community, & EducationMount Royal University4825 Mount Royal Gate SWCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| | - Joshua Wright
- Department of NeurologyThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Matthew B. Harms
- Department of NeurologyColumbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and SurgeonsNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Stephen J. Kolb
- Department of NeurologyThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical CenterColumbusOhioUSA
- Department of Biological Chemistry & PharmacologyThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical CenterColumbusOhioUSA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Knabe M, Wetzka J, Welsch L, Richl J, Michael F, Blößer S, Heilani M, Kronsbein H, May A. Radiofrequency ablation versus hybrid argon plasma coagulation in Barrett's esophagus: a prospective randomised trial. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7803-7811. [PMID: 37605011 PMCID: PMC10520130 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10313-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and hybrid argon plasma coagulation (H-APC) are established thermal ablation techniques for eradicating Barrett's esophagus after endoscopic resection. This study aimed to compare RFA with H-APC in relation to safety, effectiveness and eradication rates. METHODS After endoscopic resection, patients were randomly assigned to H-APC or RFA. A simplified H-APC technique was applied at 60 W. RFA was used with a 90° focal catheter and a simplified protocol of 12 J/cm2 × 3 or with a Halo 360° balloon and 10 J/cm2/cleaning/10 J/cm2. Eradication rates and adverse events were recorded. Patients received follow-up examinations after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. RESULTS One hundred and one patients were finally included in the study (RFA N = 47, H-APC N = 54). The median follow-up period for short-term was 6.0 (CI 5.4-6.9) months and for long term 21 (CI 19.2.5-22.7) months. In total 211 ablations were performed. The eradication rates after long-term follow-up were 74.2% in the RFA group and 82.9% in the H-APC group. Post-interventional pain was significantly greater in the RFA group, with a mean score of 4.56/10 and duration of 7.54 days, in comparison with a mean score of 2.07/10 over 3.59 days in the H-APC group. Stenoses requiring intervention were noted in 3.7% of patients in the H-APC arm and 14.9% of those in the RFA arm. CONCLUSIONS Both ablation techniques have good results in relation to the eradication rate, with a slightly better outcome in the H-APC group. The severity and duration of pain were significantly greater in the RFA group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mate Knabe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Jens Wetzka
- Department of Medicine I, Asklepios Paulinen Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Lukas Welsch
- Department of Gastroenterology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Johannes Richl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sana Klinikum GmbH Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Florian Michael
- Department of Gastroenterology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Sandra Blößer
- Department of Medicine I, Asklepios Paulinen Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Myriam Heilani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Holger Kronsbein
- Department of Gastroenterology, Facility Bielefeld-Bethel, University Hospital Ostwestfalen-Lippe, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Andrea May
- Department of Medicine I, Asklepios Paulinen Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Autorinnen/Autoren, Collaborators:. S2k-Leitlinie Gastroösophageale Refluxkrankheit und eosinophile Ösophagitis der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) – März 2023 – AWMF-Registernummer: 021–013. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2023; 61:862-933. [PMID: 37494073 DOI: 10.1055/a-2060-1069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
|
15
|
Authors, und die Mitarbeiter der Leitlinienkommission, Collaborators:. S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie der Plattenepithelkarzinome und Adenokarzinome des Ösophagus. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2023; 61:e209-e307. [PMID: 37285869 DOI: 10.1055/a-1771-6953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
|
16
|
Wadhwa V, Patel N, Grover D, Ali FS, Thosani N. Interventional gastroenterology in oncology. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73:286-319. [PMID: 36495087 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer is one of the foremost health problems worldwide and is among the leading causes of death in the United States. Gastrointestinal tract cancers account for almost one third of the cancer-related mortality globally, making it one of the deadliest groups of cancers. Early diagnosis and prompt management are key to preventing cancer-related morbidity and mortality. With advancements in technology and endoscopic techniques, endoscopy has become the core in diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal tract cancers. In this extensive review, the authors discuss the role endoscopy plays in early detection, diagnosis, and management of esophageal, gastric, colorectal, pancreatic, ampullary, biliary tract, and small intestinal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaibhav Wadhwa
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), Division of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Texas Health Science Center, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nicole Patel
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), Division of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Texas Health Science Center, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Dheera Grover
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), Division of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Texas Health Science Center, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Faisal S Ali
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), Division of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Texas Health Science Center, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nirav Thosani
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth (iGUT), Division of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Texas Health Science Center, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wang S, Saeidi T, Lilge L, Betz V. Integrating clinical access limitations into iPDT treatment planning with PDT-SPACE. BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS 2023; 14:714-738. [PMID: 36874501 PMCID: PMC9979674 DOI: 10.1364/boe.478217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
PDT-SPACE is an open-source software tool that automates interstitial photodynamic therapy treatment planning by providing patient-specific placement of light sources to destroy a tumor while minimizing healthy tissue damage. This work extends PDT-SPACE in two ways. The first enhancement allows specification of clinical access constraints on light source insertion to avoid penetrating critical structures and to minimize surgical complexity. Constraining fiber access to a single burr hole of adequate size increases healthy tissue damage by 10%. The second enhancement generates an initial placement of light sources as a starting point for refinement, rather than requiring entry of a starting solution by the clinician. This feature improves productivity and also leads to solutions with 4.5% less healthy tissue damage. The two features are used in concert to perform simulations of various surgery options of virtual glioblastoma multiforme brain tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuran Wang
- Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, 10 King’s College Rd, Toronto, ON M5S3G8, Canada
| | - Tina Saeidi
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 101 College Street, Toronto, ON M5G1L7, Canada
| | - Lothar Lilge
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 101 College Street, Toronto, ON M5G1L7, Canada
| | - Vaughn Betz
- Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, 10 King’s College Rd, Toronto, ON M5S3G8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chidambaram S, Patel NM, Sounderajah V, Alfieri R, Bonavina L, Cheong E, Cockbain A, D’Journo XB, Ferri L, Griffiths EA, Grimminger P, Gronnier C, Gutschow C, Hedberg J, Kauppila JH, Lagarde S, Low D, Nafteux P, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Nilsson M, Rosati R, Schroeder W, Smithers BM, van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Hillegesberg R, Watson DI, Vohra R, Maynard N, Markar SR. Identifying a core symptom set triggering radiological and endoscopic investigations for suspected recurrent esophago-gastric cancer: a modified Delphi consensus process. Dis Esophagus 2022; 36:doac038. [PMID: 35858213 PMCID: PMC9817822 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is currently a lack of evidence-based guidelines regarding surveillance for recurrence after esophageal and gastric (OG) cancer surgical resection, and which symptoms should prompt endoscopic or radiological investigations for recurrence. The aim of this study was to develop a core symptom set using a modified Delphi consensus process that should guide clinicians to carry out investigations to look for suspected recurrent OG cancer in previously asymptomatic patients. METHODS A web-based survey of 42 questions was sent to surgeons performing OG cancer resections at high volume centers. The first section evaluated the structure of follow-up and the second, determinants of follow-up. Two rounds of a modified Delphi consensus process and a further consensus workshop were used to determine symptoms warranting further investigations. Symptoms with a 75% consensus agreement as suggestive of recurrent cancer were included in the core symptom set. RESULTS 27 surgeons completed the questionnaires. A total of 70.3% of centers reported standardized surveillance protocols, whereas 3.7% of surgeons did not undertake any surveillance in asymptomatic patients after OG cancer resection. In asymptomatic patients, 40.1% and 25.9% of centers performed routine imaging and endoscopy, respectively. The core set that reached consensus, consisted of eight symptoms that warranted further investigations included; dysphagia to solid food, dysphagia to liquids, vomiting, abdominal pain, chest pain, regurgitation of foods, unexpected weight loss and progressive hoarseness of voice. CONCLUSION There is global variation in monitoring patients after OG cancer resection. Eight symptoms were identified by the consensus process as important in prompting radiological or endoscopic investigation for suspected recurrent malignancy. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to link surveillance strategies to survival outcomes and evaluate prognostic value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nikhil M Patel
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Rita Alfieri
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Surgical Oncology of Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS Padua, Italy
| | - Edward Cheong
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - Andy Cockbain
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Xavier Benoit D’Journo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, North Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Lorenzo Ferri
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Peter Grimminger
- Department of General Surgery, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Christian Gutschow
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jakob Hedberg
- Section of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Joonas H Kauppila
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulo, Finland
| | - Sjoerd Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Donald Low
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Philippe Nafteux
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Magnus Nilsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Wolfgang Schroeder
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplantation Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - B Mark Smithers
- Upper GI and Soft Tissue Unit, Academy of Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | | | - David I Watson
- Discipline of Surgery, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Center, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ravinder Vohra
- Department of Esophagogastric Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Nick Maynard
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Utilization trends for endoscopic ablation therapy and esophagectomy in Barrett's esophagus from 2005 to 2019. Sci Rep 2022; 12:17619. [PMID: 36271289 PMCID: PMC9587253 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21838-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Guidelines have shifted to now recommend endoscopic eradication therapy for Barrett's esophagus (BE) with low and high-grade dysplasia. Previously, esophagectomy was the standard therapy for high-grade dysplasia. However, it is unclear to what degree ablation therapy has affected utilization of esophagectomy. In this retrospective observational cohort study of BE patients without cancer from the Premier Healthcare Database, the prevalence of utilization of endoscopic ablation therapy and of esophagectomy in BE were calculated and temporal trends were evaluated. A total of 938, 333 BE cases were included in the study. There was a significantly increasing trend of ablation over the period 2006 to 2010 (Annual Percentage Change (APC); 95% CI 0.56% [0.51%, 0.61%]), a significantly decreasing trend for the period 2011 to 2015 (APC; 95% CI - 0.15% [- 0.20%, - 0.11%]), and a shallow increasing trend for the period 2016 to 2019 (APC; 95% CI 0.09% [0.06%, 0.11%]). For esophagectomy, there was a significantly decreasing trend for the period 2006 to 2009 (APC; 95% CI - 0.03% [- 0.04%, - 0.02%]; P < 0.001) that corresponded to the uptrend in utilization of endoscopic ablation. There was a stable trend of esophagectomy over the period 2010 to 2019 (APC; 95% CI - 0.0006% [- 0.0002%, 0.0005%]; P = 0.1947). Adoption and increased utilization of endoscopic ablation therapy for BE has coincided with a decrease in esophagectomy, and is the predominate method of therapy for BE with dysplasia.
Collapse
|
20
|
Krause J, Rösch T, Steurer S, Clauditz T, Sehner S, Schumacher U, Neuhaus H, Messmann H, Schumacher B, Probst A, Schachschal G, Ehlken H, Vieth M, Schmitz R. Quantitative analysis of submucosal excision depth in endoscopic resection for early Barrett's cancer. Endoscopy 2022; 54:565-570. [PMID: 34856621 DOI: 10.1055/a-1659-3514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : Following endoscopic resection of early-stage Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma (BEA), further oncologic management then fundamentally relies upon the accurate assessment of histopathologic risk criteria, which requires there to be sufficient amounts of submucosal tissue in the resection specimens. METHODS : In 1685 digitized tissue sections from endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) performed for 76 early BEA cases from three experienced centers, the submucosal thickness was determined, using software developed in-house. Neoplastic lesions were manually annotated. RESULTS : No submucosa was seen in about a third of the entire resection area (mean 33.8 % [SD 17.2 %]), as well as underneath cancers (33.3 % [28.3 %]), with similar results for both resection methods and with respect to submucosal thickness. ESD results showed a greater variability between centers than EMR. In T1b cancers, a higher rate of submucosal defects tended to correlate with R1 resections. CONCLUSION : The absence of submucosa underneath about one third of the tissue of endoscopically resected BEAs should be improved. Results were more center-dependent for ESD than for EMR. Submucosal defects can potentially serve as a parameter for standardized reports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Krause
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Rösch
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Steurer
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Till Clauditz
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Sehner
- Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Udo Schumacher
- Department of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Horst Neuhaus
- Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelic Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Helmut Messmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Brigitte Schumacher
- Department of Internal Medicine, Evangelic Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.,Department of Gastroenterology, Elisabeth Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Andreas Probst
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Guido Schachschal
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hanno Ehlken
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Schmitz
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zheng H, Kang N, Huang Y, Zhao Y, Zhang R. Endoscopic resection versus esophagectomy for early esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Transl Cancer Res 2022; 10:2653-2662. [PMID: 35116578 PMCID: PMC8798594 DOI: 10.21037/tcr-21-182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Background Esophagectomy is the standard treatment for early-stage esophageal cancer but is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Thus, endoscopic resection is increasingly used as an alternative option. However, the literature is inconsistent regarding the efficacy of these treatments. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these two treatments. Methods A systematic electronic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed for studies comparing endoscopic resection and surgery for early-stage esophageal cancer. The overall survival, tumor recurrence, major adverse events, procedure-related mortality, and R0 resection rates were investigated. Forest plots were constructed based on the random-effects model. Results We found 15 studies involving 2,467 and 2,264 patients who underwent endoscopic resection and surgery, respectively. The meta-analysis showed that patients undergoing endoscopic resection had significantly fewer major adverse events (relative risk, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.33–0.64) and a lower procedure-related mortality rate (relative risk, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.10–0.73) than those undergoing surgery. The number of postprocedural stricture events did not significantly differ between the two treatments (relative risk, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.53–1.49). Endoscopic resection was associated with higher recurrence rates (relative risk, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.99–2.89) and lower R0 resection rates (relative risk, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.86–0.98) than surgery. There may be some advantage conferred by esophagectomy in the long-term survival outcomes (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.43). Discussion Endoscopic resection is a minimally invasive and safe treatment for early-stage esophageal cancer. However, esophagectomy may be associated with better long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Zheng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Ningning Kang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Yunlong Huang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Yuan Zhao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Renquan Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Godat S, Marx M, Caillol F, Robert M, Autret A, Bories E, Pesenti C, Ratone JP, Schoepfer A, Poizat F, Giovannini M. Benefit of radiofrequency ablation after widespread endoscopic resection of neoplastic Barrett's esophagus in daily practice. Ann Gastroenterol 2022; 35:34-41. [PMID: 34987286 PMCID: PMC8713341 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2021.0685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background High-grade dysplasia (HGD) and intramucosal carcinoma (IMC) in Barrett’s esophagus (BE) are now well-established indications for endoscopic resection (ER). Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can be combined with ER in case of flat or long-segment BE ablation. We report here our experience of complementary RFA after widespread ER of neoplastic BE in daily practice. Method We retrospectively reviewed data of 89 patients, treated between 2006 and 2013 by ER alone (group 1) or by ER combined with RFA (group 2). Results Fifty-five patients in group 1 (7F/48M, mean age 68 years) underwent widespread ER with eradication of residual non-dysplastic BE. Complete eradication of HGD/IMC and intestinal metaplasia (IM) was achieved in 32/32 (100%) and 48/55 (87.3%) patients, respectively. Thirty-four patients in group 2 (3F/31M, mean age 67 years) had a multimodal treatment strategy, with widespread ER followed by RFA. Mean Prague classification of BE in this group was significantly longer (C4.4M6.6 vs. C2.7M4.5, P<0.001). Complete eradication of HGD/IMC and non-dysplastic BE was confirmed in 26/27 (96.3%) and 20/34 (58.8%) patients, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups concerning adverse events (16.4% vs. 23.5%, P=0.58) or recurrence rate of HGD/IMC (9.1% vs. 14.7%, P=0.42). The mismatch rate between preoperative and final histological diagnosis was high in both groups, at 45.5% and 26.5%. Conclusions A combination of ER and RFA can treat significantly longer neoplastic BE than ER alone, with the same efficiency and safety. Widespread ER, in contrast, is the only method of obtaining a reliable histological diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Godat
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland (Sébastien Godat, Mariola Marx, Maxime Robert, Alain Schoepfer)
| | - Mariola Marx
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland (Sébastien Godat, Mariola Marx, Maxime Robert, Alain Schoepfer)
| | - Fabrice Caillol
- Division of Gastroenterology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France (Fabrice Caillol, Erwan Bories, Jean Philippe Ratone, Marc Giovannini)
| | - Maxime Robert
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland (Sébastien Godat, Mariola Marx, Maxime Robert, Alain Schoepfer)
| | - Aurélie Autret
- Division of Biostatistics, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France (Aurélie Autret)
| | - Erwan Bories
- Division of Gastroenterology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France (Fabrice Caillol, Erwan Bories, Jean Philippe Ratone, Marc Giovannini)
| | - Christian Pesenti
- Division of Gastroenterology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France (Fabrice Caillol, Erwan Bories, Jean Philippe Ratone, Marc Giovannini)
| | - Jean Philippe Ratone
- Division of Gastroenterology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France (Fabrice Caillol, Erwan Bories, Jean Philippe Ratone, Marc Giovannini)
| | - Alain Schoepfer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland (Sébastien Godat, Mariola Marx, Maxime Robert, Alain Schoepfer)
| | - Flora Poizat
- Division of Pathology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France (Flora Poizat)
| | - Marc Giovannini
- Division of Gastroenterology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France (Fabrice Caillol, Erwan Bories, Jean Philippe Ratone, Marc Giovannini)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
HAN S, LOW DE. LAPAROSCOPIC ANTIREFLUX SURGERY: ARE OLD QUESTIONS ANSWERED? SHOULD IT BE USED CONJOINED WITH ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY FOR BARRETT’S ESOPHAGUS? ABCD. ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA (SÃO PAULO) 2022; 35:e1664. [PMID: 35766609 PMCID: PMC9254380 DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020210002e1664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
24
|
Strum RP, Tavares W, Worster A, Griffith LE, Costa AP. Identifying patient characteristics associated with potentially redirectable paramedic transported emergency department visits in Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e054625. [PMID: 35225823 PMCID: PMC8718420 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Paramedic redirection from emergency department (ED) to subacute centres may be more beneficial for some patients, though little is known about which patients are potentially appropriate. We examined whether patient characteristics were associated with ED visits when the main intervention was suitable to be performed in a subacute centre. METHODS We conducted a retrospective observational study using the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System from 2014 to 2018 in Ontario, Canada. We included all adult patients transported by paramedics and had a main physician intervention recorded. We used results of a RAND/UCLA modified Delphi study to categorise patients into either ED or a subacute care (urgent care and/or general practice centre) based on their main intervention. An independent logistic regression model was analysed for each subacute centre. RESULTS A total of 2 394 072 ED visits were included; 59% of ED interventions were categorised as 'urgent care', 27% 'ED only', 9% either 'urgent care' or 'general practice' and 5% had an intervention not previously classified. ED visits suitable for 'general practice' had the highest percentage of patients discharged, while 'ED only' had the lowest. Lower medical acuity, younger age, time of triage in evening and overnight, and discharged from ED were independently associated with both subacute centres. 'Urgent care' visits/interventions were associated with an ED main diagnosis of the respiratory system (OR 3.49), while 'general practice' visits were associated with mental health disorders (OR 9.85) and injury/poison/consequences of external causes (OR 3.38). CONCLUSIONS The majority of ED visits had a main intervention that could have potentially been conducted in a subacute centre. We identified characteristics and diagnostic patterns associated with ED visits when the main intervention was categorised as a subacute centre intervention. This study contributes knowledge to inform which patients are potentially appropriate for paramedic redirection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan P Strum
- Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Walter Tavares
- The Wilson Centre and Post MD Education, University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Worster
- Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Emergency Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lauren E Griffith
- Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- McMaster Institute for Research and Aging, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew P Costa
- Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Singhal T, Rodrigues C, Soman R, Wattal C, Swaminathan S, Nambi S, Talwar D, Singh RK, Todi S. Treatment of MRSA infections in India: Clinical insights from a Delphi analysis. Indian J Med Microbiol 2021; 40:35-45. [PMID: 34785281 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2021.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE International and Indian guidelines for the management of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are available, but the local guidelines are not MRSA-specific. This study aimed to provide clinical insights for the treatment of MRSA infections in India. METHODS We used a three-step modified Delphi method to obtain insights. Ten experts comprising infectious disease specialists, microbiologists, pulmonologists, and critical care experts agreed to participate in the analysis. In round 1, a total of 161 statements were circulated to the panel and the experts were asked to 'agree' or 'disagree' by responding 'yes' or 'no' to each statement and provide comments. The same process was used for 73 statements in round 2. Direct interaction with the experts was carried out in round 3 wherein 35 statements were discussed. At least 80% of the experts had to agree for a statement to reach concordance. RESULTS Eighty-eight statements in round 1, thirty-eight statements in round 2, and eight statements in round 3 reached concordance and were accepted without modification. The final document comprised 152 statements on the management of various syndromes associated with MRSA such as skin and soft tissue infections, bacteremia and endocarditis, pneumonia, bone and joint infections, and central nervous system infections. CONCLUSIONS This analysis will assist clinicians in India to choose an appropriate course of action for MRSA infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanu Singhal
- Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hospital and Medical Research Institute, Mumbai, India
| | | | | | - Chand Wattal
- Clinical Microbiology & Immunology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Subramanian Swaminathan
- Infectious Diseases and Infection Control at Gleneagles Global Hospitals (Chennai, Bangalore, Hyderabad), India
| | | | - Deepak Talwar
- Metro Respiratory Center Pulmonology & Sleep Medicine, Metro Hospital, Noida, India
| | | | - Subhash Todi
- Critical Care Medicine, Department of Academics & Health Research, AMRI Hospitals, Kolkata, India.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Exploring Consensus on Preventive Measures and Identification of Patients at Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Using the Delphi Process. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10225432. [PMID: 34830713 PMCID: PMC8623425 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10225432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Early identification of AMD can lead to prompt and more effective treatment, better outcomes, and better final visual acuity; several risk scores have been devised to determine the individual level of risk for developing AMD. Herein, the Delphi method was used to provide recommendations for daily practice regarding preventive measures and follow-up required for subjects at low, moderate, and high risk of AMD evaluated with the Simplified Test AMD Risk-assessment Scale (STARS®) questionnaire. Methods: A steering committee of three experts drafted and refined 25 statements on the approach to be recommended in different clinical situations [general recommendations (n = 2), use of evaluation tools (n = 4), general lifestyle advice (n = 3), and AREDS-based nutritional supplementation (n = 5)] with the help of a group of international experts, all co-authors of this paper. Thirty retinal specialists from Europe and the US were chosen based on relevant publications, clinical expertise, and experience in AMD, who then provided their level of agreement with the statements. Statements for which consensus was not reached were modified and voted upon again. Results: In the first round of voting, consensus was reached for 24 statements. After modification, consensus was then reached for the remaining statement. Conclusion: An interprofessional guideline to support preventive measures in patients at risk of AMD based on STARS® scoring has been developed to aid clinicians in daily practice, which will help to optimize preventive care of patients at risk of AMD.
Collapse
|
27
|
Gaudino M, Sandner S, Di Giammarco G, Di Franco A, Arai H, Asai T, Bakaeen F, Doenst T, Fremes SE, Glineur D, Kieser TM, Lawton JS, Lorusso R, Patel N, Puskas JD, Tatoulis J, Taggart DP, Vallely M, Ruel M. The Use of Intraoperative Transit Time Flow Measurement for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Systematic Review of the Evidence and Expert Opinion Statements. Circulation 2021; 144:1160-1171. [PMID: 34606302 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.121.054311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Transit time flow measurement (TTFM) allows quality control in coronary artery bypass grafting but remains largely underused, probably because of limited information and the lack of standardization. We performed a systematic review of the evidence on TTFM and other methods for quality control in coronary artery bypass grafting following PRISMA standards and elaborated expert recommendations by using a structured process. A panel of 19 experts took part in the consensus process using a 3-step modified Delphi method that consisted of 2 rounds of electronic voting and a final face-to-face virtual meeting. Eighty percent agreement was required for acceptance of the statements. A 2-level scale (strong, moderate) was used to grade the statements based on the perceived likelihood of a clinical benefit. The existing evidence supports an association between TTFM readings and graft patency and postoperative clinical outcomes, although there is high methodological heterogeneity among the published series. The evidence is more robust for arterial, rather than venous, grafts and for grafts to the left anterior descending artery. Although TTFM use increases the duration and the cost of surgery, there are no data to quantify this effect. Based on the systematic review, 10 expert statements for TTFM use in clinical practice were formulated. Six were approved at the first round of voting, 3 at the second round, and 1 at the virtual meeting. In conclusion, although TTFM use may increase the costs and duration of the procedure and requires a learning curve, its cost/benefit ratio seems largely favorable, in view of the potential clinical consequences of graft dysfunction. These consensus statements will help to standardize the use of TTFM in clinical practice and provide guidance in clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Gaudino
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York (M.G., A.D.F.)
| | - Sigrid Sandner
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria (S.S.)
| | | | - Antonino Di Franco
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York (M.G., A.D.F.)
| | - Hirokuni Arai
- The Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Japan (H.A.)
| | - Tohru Asai
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan (T.A.)
| | - Faisal Bakaeen
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH (F.B.)
| | - Torsten Doenst
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, University Hospital, Germany (T.D.)
| | - Stephen E Fremes
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Schulich Heart Centre, and Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.E.F.)
| | - David Glineur
- Division of Cardiac Surgery (D.G.), University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada
| | - Teresa M Kieser
- Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Canada (T.M.K.)
| | - Jennifer S Lawton
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (J.S.L.)
| | - Roberto Lorusso
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands (R.L.)
| | - Nirav Patel
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York (N.P.)
| | - John D Puskas
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mount Sinai Morningside Hospital, New York (J.D.P.)
| | - James Tatoulis
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (J.T.)
| | - David P Taggart
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, United Kingdom (D.P.T.)
| | - Michael Vallely
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus (M.V.)
| | - Marc Ruel
- Division of Cardiac Surgery (M.R.), University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abu-Farsakh S, Drage MG, Huber AR, Turner BM, Varghese S, Wang X, Whitney-Miller CL, Gonzalez RS. Interobserver Agreement in the Diagnosis of Anal Dysplasia: Comparison Between Gastrointestinal and Gynaecologic Pathologists and Utility of Consensus Conferences. Histopathology 2021; 80:648-655. [PMID: 34601750 DOI: 10.1111/his.14578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Management of anal dysplasia relies on the accurate diagnosis of anal biopsy specimens. As institutions move toward subspecialty signout (SSSO), decisions must be made regarding whether to assign anal biopsies to the gastrointestinal (GI) or gynaecologic (GYN) pathology service. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified 200 archival tissue biopsies of anal mucosa and circulated them among three GI pathologists and three GYN pathologists. Each pathologist separately scored each biopsy as normal, atypical, LSIL, or HSIL. Every case that was called HSIL by at least one pathologist was stained with p16 immunostain and a "gold standard" interpretation of whether a case represented HSIL was made. RESULTS The GI pathologists agreed on 97 (49%) cases prior to consensus; the GYN pathologists agreed on 33 (17%). The sensitivities of the 3 GI pathologists in detecting HSIL against the "gold standard" were 47%, 100%, and 21%, and for the GYN pathologists the sensitivities were 74%, 89%, and 84%; the sensitivities of both the GI and GYN consensus diagnoses were 74% each. The specificities of the 3 GI pathologists in detecting HSIL were 99%, 90%, and 100%, and for the GYN pathologists the specificities were 99%, 92%, and 91%; the specificities of both the GI and GYN consensus diagnoses were 100%. CONCLUSIONS A mild to moderate degree of interobserver variability exists in the diagnosis of anal dysplasia among pathologists. Our study does indicate the utility of some form of consensus conference, as overall agreement among GI pathologists and among GYN pathologists improved following in-person consensus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohaib Abu-Farsakh
- Department of Pathology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester.,Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston
| | - Michael G Drage
- Department of Pathology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester.,Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston
| | - Aaron R Huber
- Department of Pathology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester.,Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston
| | - Bradley M Turner
- Department of Pathology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester.,Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston
| | - Sharlin Varghese
- Department of Pathology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester.,Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston
| | - Xi Wang
- Department of Pathology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester.,Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston
| | - Christa L Whitney-Miller
- Department of Pathology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester.,Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston
| | - Raul S Gonzalez
- Department of Pathology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester.,Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Expert consensus on endoscopic papillectomy using a Delphi process. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94:760-773.e18. [PMID: 33887269 PMCID: PMC8878358 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Consensus regarding an optimal algorithm for endoscopic treatment of papillary adenomas has not been established. We aimed to assess the existing degree of consensus among international experts and develop further concordance by means of a Delphi process. METHODS Fifty-two international experts in the field of endoscopic papillectomy were invited to participate. Data were collected between August and December 2019 using an online survey platform. Three rounds were conducted. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement. RESULTS Sixteen experts (31%) completed the full process, and consensus was achieved on 47 of the final 79 statements (59%). Diagnostic workup should include at least an upper endoscopy using a duodenoscope (100%) and biopsy sampling (94%). There should be selected use of additional abdominal imaging (75%-81%). Patients with (suspected) papillary malignancy or over 1 cm intraductal extension should be referred for surgical resection (76%). To prevent pancreatitis, rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be administered before resection (82%) and a pancreatic stent should be placed (100%). A biliary stent is indicated in case of ongoing bleeding from the papillary region (76%) or concerns for a (micro)perforation after resection (88%). Follow-up should be started 3 to 6 months after initial papillectomy and repeated every 6 to 12 months for at least 5 years (75%). CONCLUSIONS This is the first step in developing an international consensus-based algorithm for endoscopic management of papillary adenomas. Surprisingly, in many areas consensus could not be achieved. These aspects should be the focus of future studies.
Collapse
|
30
|
Blößer S, May A, Welsch L, Ast M, Braun S, Velten T, Biehl M, Tschammer J, Roeb E, Knabe M. Virtual Biopsy by Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy in Barrett's Carcinoma. J Gastrointest Cancer 2021; 53:948-957. [PMID: 34559362 PMCID: PMC9630236 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-021-00703-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Early detection of adenocarcinomas in the esophagus is crucial for achieving curative endoscopic therapy. Targeted biopsies of suspicious lesions, as well as four-quadrant biopsies, represent the current diagnostic standard. However, this procedure is time-consuming, cost-intensive, and examiner-dependent. The aim of this study was to test whether impedance spectroscopy is capable of distinguishing between healthy, premalignant, and malignant lesions. An ex vivo measurement method was developed to examine esophageal lesions using impedance spectroscopy immediately after endoscopic resection. Methods After endoscopic resection of suspicious lesions in the esophagus, impedance measurements were performed on resected cork-covered tissue using a measuring head that was developed, with eight gold electrodes, over 10 different measurement settings and with frequencies from 100 Hz to 1 MHz. Results A total of 105 measurements were performed in 60 patients. A dataset of 400 per investigation and a total of more than 42,000 impedance measurements were therefore collected. Electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was able to detect dysplastic esophageal mucosa with a sensitivity of 81% in Barrett’s esophagus. Conclusion In summary, EIS was able to distinguish different tissue characteristics in the different esophageal tissues. EIS thus holds potential for further development of targeted biopsies during surveillance endoscopy. Trial Registration NCT04046601
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Blößer
- Department of Medicine II, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany
- Department of Medicine I, Asklepios Paulinen Klinik Wiesbaden, Geisenheimer Strasse 10, 65197, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Andrea May
- Department of Medicine II, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany
- Department of Medicine I, Asklepios Paulinen Klinik Wiesbaden, Geisenheimer Strasse 10, 65197, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Lukas Welsch
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medizinische Klinik I, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Michael Ast
- Stockert GmbH, Bötzinger Strasse 72, 79111, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Braun
- Institute of Pathology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Starkenburgring 66, 63069, Offenbach, Germany
| | - Thomas Velten
- Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering (IBMT), Ensheimer Strasse 48, 66386, St. Ingbert, Germany
| | - Margit Biehl
- Fraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering (IBMT), Ensheimer Strasse 48, 66386, St. Ingbert, Germany
| | - Jonas Tschammer
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Rudolf-Buchheim-Str. 6, 35392, Giessen, Germany
| | - Elke Roeb
- Department of Gastroenterology, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany
| | - Mate Knabe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medizinische Klinik I, University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Karamchandani DM, Gonzalez RS, Westerhoff M, Westbrook LM, Panarelli NC, Al-Nuaimi M, King T, Arnold CA. Measuring depth of invasion of submucosa - invasive adenocarcinoma in oesophageal endoscopic specimens: how good are we?☆. Histopathology 2021; 80:420-429. [PMID: 34519098 DOI: 10.1111/his.14566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Emerging data support that submucosa-invasive (pT1b) esophageal adenocarcinomas are cured via endoscopic resection, provided that invasion measures ≤500 μm, they lack other histological features predictive of nodal metastasis and have negative margins. Hence, pathologists' measurement of the depth of submucosal invasion in endoscopic resections may dictate further management (i.e. endoscopic follow-up versus oesophagectomy). In this study, we assessed the interobserver agreement in measuring the depth of submucosal invasion in oesophageal endoscopic resections. METHODS AND RESULTS Six subspecialised gastrointestinal (GI) pathologists from five academic centres independently measured the depth of submucosal invasion in μm from the deepest muscularis mucosae on 37 oesophageal endoscopic resection slides (round 1 scoring). A consensus meeting with a systematic approach for measuring and discussion of pitfalls was undertaken and remeasuring (round 2 scoring) was conducted. Interobserver agreement was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's kappa statistics. A lack of agreement was seen among the six reviewers with a poor ICC for both rounds: 1 [0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.26-0.56] and 2 (0.49, 95% CI = 0.34-0.63). When measurements were categorised as < or >500 μm, the overall agreement among the six reviewers was only fair for both rounds: 1 (kappa = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.22-0.53) and 2 (kappa = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.12-0.46). CONCLUSIONS Our study shows a lack of agreement among gastrointestinal pathologists in measuring the depth of submucosal invasion in oesophageal endoscopic resections despite formulating a consensus approach for scoring. If important management decisions continue to be based upon this parameter, more reproducible and concrete guidelines are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dipti M Karamchandani
- Department of Pathology, 1 Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center/Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Mayyadah Al-Nuaimi
- Department of Pathology, 1 Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center/Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Tonya King
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Staudenmann DA, Skacel EP, Tsoutsman T, Kaffes AJ, Saxena P. Safety and long-term efficacy of hybrid-argon plasma coagulation for the treatment of Barrett's esophagus: An Australian pilot study (with video). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION 2021. [DOI: 10.18528/ijgii200050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tatiana Tsoutsman
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- The University of Sydney School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia
| | - Arthur John Kaffes
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- The University of Sydney School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia
| | - Payal Saxena
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- The University of Sydney School of Medicine, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
O'Brien NF, Reuter-Rice K, Wainwright MS, Kaplan SL, Appavu B, Erklauer JC, Ghosh S, Kirschen M, Kozak B, Lidsky K, Lovett ME, Mehollin-Ray AR, Miles DK, Press CA, Simon DW, Tasker RC, LaRovere KL. Practice Recommendations for Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography in Critically Ill Children in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus Statement. J Pediatr Intensive Care 2021; 10:133-142. [PMID: 33884214 PMCID: PMC8052112 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) is being used in many pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) to aid in the diagnosis and monitoring of children with known or suspected pathophysiological changes to cerebral hemodynamics. Standardized approaches to scanning protocols, interpretation, and documentation of TCD examinations in this setting are lacking. A panel of multidisciplinary clinicians with expertise in the use of TCD in the PICU undertook a three-round modified Delphi process to reach unanimous agreement on 34 statements and then create practice recommendations for TCD use in the PICU. Use of these recommendations will help to ensure that high quality TCD images are captured, interpreted, and reported using standard nomenclature. Furthermore, use will aid in ensuring reproducible and meaningful study results between TCD practitioners and across PICUs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Fortier O'Brien
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Ohio, United States
| | - Karin Reuter-Rice
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, School of Medicine, School of Nursing, Duke University, Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, North Carolina, United States
| | - Mark S. Wainwright
- Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle Children's Hospital, Washington, United States
| | - Summer L. Kaplan
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Brian Appavu
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Barrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital, University of Arizona College of Medicine—Phoenix, Arizona, United States
| | - Jennifer C. Erklauer
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine and Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Texas, United States
| | - Suman Ghosh
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Neurology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Florida, United States
| | - Matthew Kirschen
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Pediatrics and Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Brandi Kozak
- Department of Radiology, Ultrasound Division, Center for Pediatric Contrast Ultrasound, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Karen Lidsky
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Wolfson Children's Hospital, University of Florida, Florida, United States
| | - Marlina Elizabeth Lovett
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Ohio, United States
| | - Amy R. Mehollin-Ray
- Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, E.B. Singleton Department of Pediatric Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Texas, United States
| | - Darryl K. Miles
- Department of Pediatrics/Division of Critical Care, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Texas, United States
| | - Craig A. Press
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Child Neurology, University of Colorado, Children's Hospital Colorado, Colorado, United States
| | - Dennis W. Simon
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Robert C. Tasker
- Departments of Neurology & Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Kerri Lynn LaRovere
- Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
|
35
|
Aloraibi S, Gladman J, Godfrey D, Booth V, Robinson K, Lunt E, Caswell A, Kerr M, Ollivere B, Gordon AL. Optimal care for the management of older people non-weight bearing after lower limb fracture: a consensus study. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:332. [PMID: 34030635 PMCID: PMC8146625 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02265-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older people who are non-weight-bearing after a lower limb fracture are at risk of poor outcomes but there are no clinical guidelines for this group of patients. Given the paucity of the research evidence base, we conducted a consensus exercise to ascertain expert opinion about the management of this group. METHODS A three-round e-Delphi technique was planned to use the online JISC survey tool with a multidisciplinary panel of health professionals. Panellists were invited by email via professional organisations and UK NHS Trusts. The initial statements for this study were prepared by the authors based upon the findings of their scoping review. Consensus required >/= 70% agreement with statements. RESULTS Only 2 survey rounds were required. Ninety panellists, representing seven clinical disciplines, reached consensus for 24 statements about general issues (osteoporosis detection and management, falls risk reduction and nutrition) and specific non-weight bearing issues (such as the need for activity to be promoted during this period). CONCLUSIONS These findings can be used in the generation of a clinical guideline for this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Aloraibi
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, The Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, B109, Floor B, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Medical School, QMC, B111, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
| | - J Gladman
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, The Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, B109, Floor B, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Medical School, QMC, B111, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
- Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Room WC1388 Level C, West Block, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
- NHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) East Midlands, Nottingham, UK
| | - D Godfrey
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Lings Bar Hospital, Beckside, Gamston, Nottingham, NG2 6PR, UK
| | - V Booth
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, The Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, B109, Floor B, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Medical School, QMC, B111, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
- Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Room WC1388 Level C, West Block, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - K Robinson
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, The Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, B109, Floor B, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Medical School, QMC, B111, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
- Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Room WC1388 Level C, West Block, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - E Lunt
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, The Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, B109, Floor B, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Medical School, QMC, B111, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
- Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Room WC1388 Level C, West Block, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - A Caswell
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, The Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, B109, Floor B, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - M Kerr
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, The Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, B109, Floor B, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - B Ollivere
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, The Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, B109, Floor B, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Medical School, QMC, B111, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
- Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Room WC1388 Level C, West Block, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - A L Gordon
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, The Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, B109, Floor B, Derby Road, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
- Division of Rehabilitation, Ageing and Wellbeing, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Medical School, QMC, B111, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
- Royal Derby Hospital, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby Medical School, Room DSN407, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Varndell W, Fry M, Lutze M, Elliott D. Use of the Delphi method to generate guidance in emergency nursing practice: A systematic review. Int Emerg Nurs 2021; 56:100867. [PMID: 32238322 DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2020.100867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
AIM To examine the application and methodological quality of the Delphi method used in developing guidance for emergency nursing practice. BACKGROUND Emergency nursing scope of practice has rapidly expanded in response to increasing patient acuity, complexity and technological innovation. Determining best practice is crucial for delivering high quality, safe and effective emergency nursing care. The Delphi method has been used to identify, prioritise complex issues and develop evidence-driven guidance in emergency nursing practice. The use and quality of the Delphi method in emergency nursing practice has not been examined. DESIGN Systematic literature review. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT A systematic literature search was conducted using the following databases: SCOPUS, EMBASE, Medline and ProQuest from date of inception to August 2019. The database search was limited to scholarly articles or peer-reviewed journals. No language restrictions were applied. The Cochrane Collaboration method and PRISMA checks were utilized to conduct the review. RESULTS Of 246 records identified 22 (8.9%) studies met the inclusion criteria. A modified Delphi method was commonly used (n = 15; 68.2%) and often conducted online (n = 11; 50.0%). Eight practice guidance themes were identified. Overall study quality was high (score 12/14; range 4-13), transparency of reporting varied. CONCLUSION Based on this review, the Delphi method is an appropriate method for exploring emergency nursing practice. The studies reviewed demonstrated that knowledge, skills and clinical expertise has progressively expanded in the specialty of emergency nursing. Variation in the application, conduct and transparency of reporting in Delphi studies developing guidance for emergency nursing practice is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wayne Varndell
- Prince of Wales Hospital Emergency Department, Randwick 2031, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo 2007, NSW, Australia.
| | - Margaret Fry
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo 2007, NSW, Australia; Director Research and Practice Development Nursing and Midwifery Directorate NSLHD, Level 7 Kolling Building, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards 2065, NSW, Australia.
| | - Matthew Lutze
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo 2007, NSW, Australia; Nursing Practice and Informatics, NSW Ministry of Health, St Leonards 2065, NSW, Australia; School of Nursing, University of Sydney, Camperdown 2050, NSW, Australia.
| | - Doug Elliott
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo 2007, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chis R, Hew S, Hopman W, Hookey L, Bechara R. Taking the Next Steps in Endoscopic Visual Assessment of Barrett's Esophagus: A Pilot Study. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2021; 14:113-122. [PMID: 33911891 PMCID: PMC8075180 DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s293477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) undergo surveillance endoscopies to assess for pre-cancerous changes. We developed a simple endoscopic classification method for predicting non-dysplastic BE (NDBE), low-grade dysplasia (LGD)/indefinite for dysplasia (ID) and high-grade dysplasia (HGD)/early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Patients and Methods Twenty-two patients with BE underwent endoscopy using the PENTAX Medical MagniView gastroscope and OPTIVISTA processor. Sixty-six video-still images were analyzed to characterize the microsurface, microvasculature and the presence of a demarcation line. Class A was characterized by regular microvascular and microsurface patterns and absence of a demarcation line, class B by changes in the microvascular and/or microsurface patterns compared to the background mucosa with presence of a demarcation line, and class C by irregular microvascular and/or irregular microsurface patterns with presence of a demarcation line. Results Of the class A images, 97.9% were NDBE. For class B, 69.2% were LGD/ID and 30.8% NDBE. One hundred percent of the class C samples were HGD/EAC. The sensitivity of our classification system was 93.8%, specificity 92%, positive predictive value 78.9%, negative predictive value 97.9% and an accuracy 92.4%. Conclusion In this study, we developed a simple classification system for the prediction of NDBE, LGD/ID and HGD/EAC. Its real-time clinical applicability will be validated prospectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxana Chis
- Division of Internal Medicine, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Simon Hew
- Division of Gastroenterology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wilma Hopman
- Research Institute, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lawrence Hookey
- Division of Gastroenterology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert Bechara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Perrone-Filardi P, Minghetti P, Menditto E, Bianchi S, Scaglione F, Trifirò G, Piccinocchi G, Corona T, Gambarelli G, Izzi C, Misciagna V, Putignano D, Lopatriello S, Cafiero D. The value of the polypill in cardiovascular disease: an Italian multidisciplinary Delphi panel consensus. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2021; 22:246-258. [PMID: 33633039 DOI: 10.2459/jcm.0000000000001159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this work was to reach the consensus of a multidisciplinary and multistakeholder Italian panel on the value of polypill in cardiovascular disease, with respect to the clinical, technological, economic and organizational dimension. A three-step modified Delphi method was used to establish consensus. Eleven experts in the area of cardiology, pharmaceutical technology, general practice, hospital pharmacy, pharmacology, and health economics participated in the expert panel. To identify existing evidence concerning the value of polypill in the prevention of patients with cardiovascular disease, a systematic literature review was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement guidelines. In the first round, 22 statements were distributed to the panel. Panel members were asked to mark 'agree' or 'disagree' for each statement and provide any comments. The same voting method was again used for the second round. In the first round nine statements met consensus. In the second round, 10 statements reached consensus. Overall, consensus was reached for 19 statements representing five value polypill domains: clinical, technological, economic and organizational. During a final web meeting with all panel members consensus document open points were discussed. Panel members agreed to recognize polypill as effective in reducing cardiovascular events, blood pressure and lipids, cardiovascular risk and the weight of therapy, in therapeutic adherence improvement, in the absence of differences in bioavailability between drugs administered in fixed or free combinations and the better cost-effectiveness profile compared with standard care. This document represents a knowledge framework to inform decision makers of the value of polypill in cardiovascular prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pasquale Perrone-Filardi
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples
- Mediterranea Cardiocentro, Napoli
| | - Paola Minghetti
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano
| | - Enrica Menditto
- Department of Pharmacy, CIRFF, Centre of Pharmacoeconomics, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli
| | - Stefano Bianchi
- U.O. Assistenza Farmaceutica Ospedaliera, Territoriale e Ricerca clinica, Ferrara
| | - Francesco Scaglione
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano
| | - Gianluca Trifirò
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Post AL, de Groof AJ, Zhang XU, Swager AF, Fockens KN, Pouw RE, Weusten BLAM, Faber DJ, de Bruin DM, Bergman JJGHM, van Leeuwen TG, Sterenborg HJCM, Curvers WL. Toward improved endoscopic surveillance with multidiameter single fiber reflectance spectroscopy in patients with Barrett's esophagus. JOURNAL OF BIOPHOTONICS 2021; 14:e202000351. [PMID: 33410602 DOI: 10.1002/jbio.202000351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Patients with Barrett's esophagus are at an increased risk to develop esophageal cancer and, therefore, undergo regular endoscopic surveillance. Early detection of neoplasia enables endoscopic treatment, which improves outcomes. However, early Barrett's neoplasia is easily missed during endoscopic surveillance. This study investigates multidiameter single fiber reflectance spectroscopy (MDSFR) to improve Barrett's surveillance. Based on the concept of field cancerization, it may be possible to identify the presence of a neoplastic lesion from measurements elsewhere in the esophagus or even the oral cavity. In this study, MDSFR measurements are performed on non-dysplastic Barrett's mucosa, squamous mucosa, oral mucosa, and the neoplastic lesion (if present). Based on logistic regression analysis on the scattering parameters measured by MDSFR, a classifier is developed that can predict the presence of neoplasia elsewhere in the Barrett's segment from measurements on the non-dysplastic Barrett's mucosa (sensitivity 91%, specificity 71%, AUC = 0.77). Classifiers obtained from logistic regression analysis for the squamous and oral mucosa do not result in an AUC significantly different from 0.5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk L Post
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albert J de Groof
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Xu U Zhang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne-Fré Swager
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kiki N Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roos E Pouw
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas L A M Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Faber
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel M de Bruin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacques J G H M Bergman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ton G van Leeuwen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henricus J C M Sterenborg
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter L Curvers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Schutz FAB, Sirachainan E, Kuppusamy S, Hoa NTT, Dejthevaporn T, Bahadzor B, Toan VQ, Chansriwong P, Alip A, Hue NTM, Parinyanitikul N, Tan AL, Hoang VDK, Tienchaiananda P, Chinchapattanam SND, Garg A. Optimizing outcomes for patients with metastatic prostate cancer: insights from South East Asia Expert Panel. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2021; 13:1758835920985464. [PMID: 33747148 PMCID: PMC7905487 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920985464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Clinical decision making is challenging in men with metastatic prostate cancer (mPC), as heterogeneity in treatment options and patient characteristics have resulted in multiple scenarios with little or no evidence. The South East Asia Expert Panel 2019 addressed some of these challenges. METHODS Based on evidence in the literature and expert interviews, 19 statements were formulated for key challenges in the treatment of men with castration-sensitive and -resistant prostate cancer in clinical practice. A modified Delphi process was used to reach consensus among experts in the panel and develop clinical practice recommendations. RESULTS The majority of the panel preferred a risk-based stratification and recommended abiraterone or enzalutamide as first-line therapy for symptomatic chemotherapy naïve patients. Abiraterone is preferred over enzalutamide as a first-line treatment in these patients. However, the panel did not support the use of abiraterone in high risk lymph-node positive only (N+M0) or in non-metastatic (N0M0) patients. In select patients, low dose abiraterone with food may be used to optimize clinical outcomes. Androgen receptor gene splice variant status may be a useful guide to therapy. In addition, generic versions of approved therapies may improve access to treatment to a broader patient population. The choice of treatment, as well as sequencing are guided by both patient and disease characteristics, preferences, drug access, cost, and compliance. CONCLUSION Expert recommendations are key to guidance for the optimal management of mPC. Appropriate choice, timing, and sequence of treatment options can help to tailor therapy to maximize outcomes in men with mPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Shanggar Kuppusamy
- Consultant Urologist, Department of Surgery,
University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | | | | | - Vu Quang Toan
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer
Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | | | - Adlinda Alip
- Clinical Oncology Unit, University Malaya
Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Nguyen Thi Minh Hue
- Department of Medical and Radiation Oncology,
Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Việt Nam
| | | | - Ai Lian Tan
- Consultant Oncologist, Hospital Pulau Pinang,
Malaysia
| | | | | | | | - Amit Garg
- Dr Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd, Global Medical
Affairs, Hyderabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ferreira RP, Bussyguin DS, Trombetta H, Melo VJD, Ximenez DR, Preti VB, Valladares GCG, Tomasich FDS, Abreu P. Treatment of esophageal cancer: surgical outcomes of 335 cases operated in a single center. Rev Col Bras Cir 2021; 48:e20202723. [PMID: 33605392 PMCID: PMC10683445 DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES the surgical approach persists as the main treatment for esophageal cancer. This study compares the patients of the same institution over time at three different times. METHODS this is a retrospective, observational, descriptive study comparing the surgical outcomes obtained by the Division of Surgical Oncology of Erasto Gaertner Hospital. The sample was divided into Period 1 (1987-1997), Period 2 (1998-2003) and Period 3 (2007-2015). Survival rates and disease-free survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Maier method. Survival predictors were identified with Cox regression. ANOVA test was used for comparison between groups. Data were analyzed with SPSS 25.0 and STATA 16, and p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS a total of 335 patients underwent esophagectomy or esophagogastrectomy. When the clinical characteristics of the 3 groups were compared, there was no statistically significant difference. Neoadjuvance was significantly higher in Period 3 (55.4% of patients). We found a histological change in the diagnosis over time, with a significant increase in adenocarcinoma. Morbidity and mortality rates were higher in Period 3. The main complications were pulmonary and anastomotic fistulas. Overall survival in 5 years increased over time, reaching 59.7% in Period 3. CONCLUSIONS better neoadjuvant treatment contributed to increase the global survival of patients, despite greater rate of immediate complications to surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphaella Paula Ferreira
- - Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, Departamento de Cirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
| | | | - Hygor Trombetta
- - Hospital Erasto Gaertner, Centro de Projetos de Ensino e Pesquisa - Curitiba - PR - Brasil
| | | | - Daniele Rezende Ximenez
- - Hospital Erasto Gaertner, Centro de Projetos de Ensino e Pesquisa - Curitiba - PR - Brasil
| | - Vinicius Basso Preti
- - Hospital Erasto Gaertner, Departamento de Cirurgia, Serviço de Cirurgia Abdominal - Curitiba - PR - Brasil
| | | | | | - Phillipe Abreu
- - Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, Departamento de Cirurgia - São Paulo - SP - Brasil
- - University of Miami, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Department of Surgery - Miami - FL - EUA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Manning MA, Shafa S, Mehrotra AK, Grenier RE, Levy AD. Role of Multimodality Imaging in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Its Complications, with Clinical and Pathologic Correlation. Radiographics 2021; 40:44-71. [PMID: 31917657 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020190029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition and impairs the quality of life for millions of patients, accounts for considerable health care spending, and is a primary risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. There have been substantial advances in understanding the pathogenesis of GERD and its complications and much progress in diagnosis and management of GERD; however, these have not been comprehensively discussed in the recent radiology literature. Understanding the role of imaging in GERD and its complications is important to aid in multidisciplinary treatment of GERD. GERD results from prolonged or recurrent reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus. Common symptoms include heartburn or regurgitation. Prolonged reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus can cause erosive esophagitis. Over time, the inflammatory response related to esophagitis can lead to deposition of fibrous tissue and development of strictures. Alternatively, the esophageal mucosa can undergo metaplasia (Barrett esophagus), a precursor to dysplasia (which can lead to adenocarcinoma). Conventional barium esophagography has long been considered the primary imaging modality for the esophagus, and the fluoroscopic findings for diagnosis of GERD have been well established. Multimodality imaging has a clear role in detection and assessment of the complications of GERD, specifically reflux esophagitis and Barrett esophagus; differentiation of benign and malignant strictures; and detection, staging, and posttreatment surveillance of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Given the dramatic changes in utilization of abdominal imaging during the past 2 decades, with significantly declining volume of fluoroscopic procedures and concomitant increase in CT and MRI studies, it is crucial that modern radiologists appreciate the value of barium esophagography in the workup of GERD and recognize the key imaging features of GERD and its complications at CT and MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria A Manning
- From the American Institute for Radiologic Pathology, 1100 Wayne Ave, Suite 1020, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (M.A.M.); Department of Radiology (M.A.M., A.D.L.) and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (S.S.), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; the Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (A.K.M.); and Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC (R.E.G.)
| | - Shervin Shafa
- From the American Institute for Radiologic Pathology, 1100 Wayne Ave, Suite 1020, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (M.A.M.); Department of Radiology (M.A.M., A.D.L.) and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (S.S.), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; the Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (A.K.M.); and Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC (R.E.G.)
| | - Anupamjit K Mehrotra
- From the American Institute for Radiologic Pathology, 1100 Wayne Ave, Suite 1020, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (M.A.M.); Department of Radiology (M.A.M., A.D.L.) and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (S.S.), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; the Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (A.K.M.); and Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC (R.E.G.)
| | - Rachel E Grenier
- From the American Institute for Radiologic Pathology, 1100 Wayne Ave, Suite 1020, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (M.A.M.); Department of Radiology (M.A.M., A.D.L.) and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (S.S.), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; the Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (A.K.M.); and Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC (R.E.G.)
| | - Angela D Levy
- From the American Institute for Radiologic Pathology, 1100 Wayne Ave, Suite 1020, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (M.A.M.); Department of Radiology (M.A.M., A.D.L.) and Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (S.S.), MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; the Joint Pathology Center, Silver Spring, Md (A.K.M.); and Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC (R.E.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Liu Y, He S, Zhang Y, Dou L, Liu X, Yu X, Lu N, Xue L, Wang G. Comparing long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for type II esophagogastric junction neoplasm. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:322. [PMID: 33708949 PMCID: PMC7944311 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are used to remove esophagogastric junction (EGJ) neoplasm. This study aimed to compare feasibility, safety, and effectiveness between ESD and EMR to help endoscopists choose treatment methods. Methods A total of 130 patients with EGJ neoplasm underwent endoscopic resection, including 52 patients with EMR and 78 patients with ESD. Cap-assisted EMR (EMRC) was performed with typical sequences. Larger lesions required removal in multiple pieces (i.e., piecemeal EMR). The ESD procedures were included that marking the periphery of the lesion, submucosa injected, circumferentially cutting and submucosal dissection. Resection time, adverse events, en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics or histopathological features between the two groups. Resection time was longer in the ESD group than in the EMR group (64.4±33.9 vs. 22.1±8.0 minutes; P<0.01). Adverse events were more common in the ESD group than in the EMR group (16.7% vs. 3.8%; P=0.03), including bleeding (7.7% vs. 3.8%), perforation (5.1% vs. 0%) and stenosis (5.1% vs. 0%). The en bloc resection rate and R0 resection rate were much higher in the ESD group than in the EMR group (98.7% and 92.3% vs. 23.1% and 23.1%, respectively; P<0.01). The 5-year overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate were 100% vs. 92.0% and 100% vs. 90.1% between the ESD and EMR groups, respectively (P=0.01 and P=0.01). The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was 100% vs. 96.0% between the ESD and EMR groups (P=0.08). The recurrence rate was lower in the ESD group than in the EMR group (0% vs. 9.6%; P=0.01). Conclusions ESD is an acceptable first-line endoscopic treatment for type II EGJ neoplasm, however, it is time-consuming and has a higher rate of adverse events. Furthermore, EMR is a safe and alternative technique, particularly when EMR could achieve en bloc resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Liu
- Department of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shun He
- Department of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yueming Zhang
- Department of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lizhou Dou
- Department of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Liu
- Department of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xinying Yu
- Department of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ning Lu
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Liyan Xue
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Guiqi Wang
- Department of Endoscopy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kolb JM, Wani S. Barrett's esophagus: current standards in advanced imaging. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 6:14. [PMID: 33409408 DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2020.02.10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) continues to be one of the fastest rising incident cancers in the Western population with the majority of patients presenting with late stage disease and associated with a dismal 5-year survival rate. Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the only identifiable precursor lesion to EAC. Strategies to screen for and survey BE are critical to detect earlier cancers and reduce morbidity and mortality related to EAC. A high-quality endoscopic examination with careful inspection of the Barrett's segment and adherence to the Seattle protocol for tissue sampling are critical. Advanced imaging modalities offer the potential to improve dysplasia detection, predict histopathology in real time and guide endoscopic eradication therapy (EET). Several technologies have been studied and although most are not yet recommended for routine clinical practice, high definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) as well as chromoendoscopy (including virtual chromoendoscopy) improved dysplasia detection in numerous studies supporting their use. Future studies should evaluate the role of artificial intelligence in optimizing detection of dysplasia in BE patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer M Kolb
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Triadafilopoulos G. GERD Outlook: A Gastroenterologist’s Perspective. MULTIDISCIPLINARY MANAGEMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE 2021:205-214. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-53751-7_15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
|
46
|
Kumarasinghe MP, Armstrong M, Foo J, Raftopoulos SC. The modern management of Barrett's oesophagus and related neoplasia: role of pathology. Histopathology 2020; 78:18-38. [PMID: 33382493 DOI: 10.1111/his.14285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Modern management of Barrett's oesophagus and related neoplasia essentially focuses upon surveillance to detect early low-risk neoplastic lesions and offering organ-preserving advanced endoscopic therapies, while traditional surgical treatments of oesophagectomy and lymph node clearance with or without chemoradiation are preserved only for high-risk and advanced carcinomas. With this evolution towards figless invasive therapy, the choice of therapy hinges upon the pathological assessment for risk stratifying patients into those with low risk for nodal metastasis who can continue with less invasive endoscopic therapies and others with high risk for nodal metastasis for which surgery or other forms of treatment are indicated. Detection and confirmation of neoplasia in the first instance depends upon endoscopic and pathological assessment. Endoscopic examination and biopsy sampling should be performed according to the recommended protocols, and endoscopic biopsy interpretation should be performed applying standard criteria using appropriate ancillary studies by histopathologists experienced in the pathology of Barrett's disease. Endoscopic resections (ERs) are both diagnostic and curative and should be performed by clinicians who are skilled with advanced endoscopic techniques. Proper preparation and handling of ERs are essential to assess histological parameters that dictate the curative nature of the procedure. Those parameters are adequacy of resection and risk of lymph node metastasis. The risk of lymph node metastasis is determined by depth invasion and presence of poor differentiation and lymphovascular invasion. Those adenocarcinomas with invasion up to muscularis mucosae (pT1a) and those with superficial submucosal invasion (pT1b) up to 500 µ with no poor differentiation and lymphovascular invasion and negative margins may be considered cured by endoscopic resections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Priyanthi Kumarasinghe
- PathWest and Clinipath Laboratories and Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, QEII Medical Centre, Perth, 6009, WA, Australia
| | - Michael Armstrong
- PathWest and Clinipath Laboratories and Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, QEII Medical Centre, Perth, 6009, WA, Australia
| | - Jonathan Foo
- PathWest and Clinipath Laboratories and Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, QEII Medical Centre, Perth, 6009, WA, Australia
| | - Spiro C Raftopoulos
- PathWest and Clinipath Laboratories and Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, QEII Medical Centre, Perth, 6009, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Wilson MS, Blencowe NS, Boyle C, Knight SR, Petty R, Vohra RS, Underwood TJ. A modified Delphi process to establish future research priorities in malignant oesophagogastric surgery. Surgeon 2020; 18:321-326. [PMID: 31859050 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2019.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Revised: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With rapid advancement in the genomics of oesophagogastric (OG) cancer and raised expectations in clinical outcomes from patients and clinicians alike there is a clear need to determine the current research priorities in OG cancer surgery. The aim of our study was to use a modified Delphi process to determine the research priorities among OG cancer surgeons in the United Kingdom. METHODS Delphi methodology may be utilised to develop consensus opinion amongst a group of experts. Members of the Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland were invited to submit individual research questions via an online survey (phase I). Two rounds of prioritisation by multidisciplinary expert healthcare professionals (phase II and III) were completed to determine a final list of high priority research questions. All questions submitted and subsequently ranked were analysed on an anonymised basis. RESULTS In total, 427 questions were submitted in phase I and 75 with an OG cancer focus were taken forward for prioritisation in phase II. Phase III produced a final list of 12 high priority questions with an emphasis on tailored or personalised treatment strategies in OG cancer surgery. CONCLUSION A modified Delphi process produced a list of 12 high priority research questions in OG cancer surgery. Future studies and awards from funding bodies should reflect this consensus list of prioritised questions in the interest of improving patient care and encouraging collaborative research across multiple centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Sj Wilson
- Department of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, FK5 4WR, UK.
| | - Natalie S Blencowe
- Centre for Surgical Research, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, BS2 8DZ, UK.
| | | | - Stephen R Knight
- Centre for Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, UK.
| | - Russell Petty
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Dundee, DD2 1SY, UK.
| | - Ravi S Vohra
- Trent Oesophago-Gastric Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK; NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK.
| | - Tim J Underwood
- Cancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Genco A, Castagneto-Gissey L, Lorenzo M, Ernesti I, Soricelli E, Casella G. Esophageal adenocarcinoma after sleeve gastrectomy: actual or potential threat? Italian series and literature review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2020; 17:848-854. [PMID: 33380354 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) leads to esophageal mucosal damage in an elevated percentage of cases, configuring a clinical condition of Barrett's esophagus (BE) in a proportion as high as 15-18.8%. BE may rarely evolve into esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). OBJECTIVES To raise awareness of BE as a precancerous lesion which may progress toward malignancy after this popular bariatric procedure. SETTING Bariatric referral centers, Italy. METHODS All patients referred to our bariatric center who developed an EAC after SG between 2012 and 2019 were reviewed and consecutively included in this study. The available scientific literature regarding this complication is additionally reviewed. RESULTS The 3 male patients comprised in this case series underwent laparoscopic SG between 2012 and 2015 in different bariatric referral centers. Age and body mass index at baseline ranged from 21-54 years and 43.1-75.6 kg/m2, respectively. All patients were lost to follow-up early after surgery (3.7 ± 1.4 months), and were diagnosed with EAC at a mean of 27.3 ± 7.6 months after SG. The 4 reported cases in the scientific literature developed an EAC at a mean of 32.5 ± 23 months from SG. Overall, a diagnosis of EAC was made approximately 30.3 ± 17.1 months postoperatively, which seems relatively and worryingly early after surgery. CONCLUSION Although the rate and probability of progression from BE to EAC is still not well defined, assuming that the rising popularity and execution of SG leads to a growth in the BE incidence, then the preoperative identification and stratification of cancer risk factors in this subset of patients is strongly encouraged. Clinical and endoscopic follow-ups are essential to allow for prevention and early diagnosis and for epidemiologic data collection purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfredo Genco
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Michele Lorenzo
- Azienda Ospedaliera Locale Napoli 3 (ASLNA3), Distretto Sanitario 56 (DS56), Unità Operativa Medicina Legale (UOML), Torre Annunziata, Naples, Italy
| | - Ilaria Ernesti
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuele Soricelli
- Department of Surgery, Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Santa Maria Nuova Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Giovanni Casella
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Canto MI, Trindade AJ, Abrams J, Rosenblum M, Dumot J, Chak A, Iyer P, Diehl D, Khara HS, Corbett FS, McKinley M, Shin EJ, Waxman I, Infantolino A, Tofani C, Samarasena J, Chang K, Wang B, Goldblum J, Voltaggio L, Montgomery E, Lightdale CJ, Shaheen NJ. Multifocal Cryoballoon Ablation for Eradication of Barrett's Esophagus-Related Neoplasia: A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115:1879-1890. [PMID: 33009064 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:
Ablation of Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the preferred approach for the treatment of neoplasia without visible lesions. Limited data on cryoballoon ablation (CBA) suggest its potential clinical utility. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of CBA in a multicenter study of patients with neoplastic BE.
METHODS:
In a prospective clinical trial, 11 academic and community centers recruited consecutive patients with BE of 1–6 cm length and low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia (HGD), or intramucosal adenocarcinoma (ImCA) confirmed by central pathology. Patients with symptomatic pre-existing strictures or visible BE lesions had dilation or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), respectively, before enrollment. A nitrous oxide cryoballoon focal ablation system was used to treat all visible columnar mucosa in up to 5 sessions. Study end points included complete eradication of all dysplasia (CE-D) and intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) at 1 year.
RESULTS:
One hundred twenty patients with BE with ImCA (20%), HGD (56%), or low-grade dysplasia (23%) were enrolled. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the CE-D and CE-IM rates were 76% and 72%, respectively. In the per-protocol analysis (94 patients), the CE-D and CE-IM rates were 97% and 91%, respectively. Postablation pain was mild and short lived. Fifteen subjects (12.5%) developed strictures requiring dilation. One patient (0.8%) with HGD progressed to ImCA, which was successfully treated with EMR. Another patient (0.8%) developed gastrointestinal bleeding associated with clopidogrel use. One patient (0.8%) had buried BE with HGD in 1 biopsy, not confirmed by subsequent EMR.
DISCUSSION:
In patients with neoplastic BE, CBA was safe and effective. Head-to-head comparisons between CBA and other ablation modalities are warranted (clinicaltrials.gov registration NCT02514525).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcia Irene Canto
- Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Arvind J. Trindade
- Division of Gastroenterology at the Zucker School of Medicine of Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Julian Abrams
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael Rosenblum
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA
| | - John Dumot
- Division of Gastroenterology at University Hospitals of Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Amitabh Chak
- Division of Gastroenterology at University Hospitals of Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Prasad Iyer
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - David Diehl
- Division of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danby Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Harshit S. Khara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danby Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Matthew McKinley
- Division of Gastroenterology at the Zucker School of Medicine of Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Eun Ji Shin
- Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology), Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Irving Waxman
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Anthony Infantolino
- Division of Gastroenterology, Jefferson Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christina Tofani
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jason Samarasena
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Kenneth Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Bingkai Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA
| | - John Goldblum
- Department of Pathology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Lysandra Voltaggio
- Department ofPathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions Baltimore Maryland, USA
| | - Elizabeth Montgomery
- Department ofPathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions Baltimore Maryland, USA
| | - Charles J. Lightdale
- Division of Gastroenterology at the Zucker School of Medicine of Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Nicholas J. Shaheen
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Saunders JH, Al-Zubaidi S, Waller RC, Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo J, Parsons SL, Ragunath K, Kaye PV. The management and long-term outcomes of endoscopic and surgical treatment of early esophageal adenocarcinoma. Dis Esophagus 2020; 33:doz097. [PMID: 32090253 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doz097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2019] [Revised: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic resection (ER) for early (pT1) esophageal adenocarcinoma can be justified if the rate of coexisting lymph node (LN) metastasis is less than the mortality rate from esophagectomy. This study examines endoscopic and surgical outcomes, histological assessment of submucosal (sm) disease, factors influencing LN metastasis, and the safety of treating pT1b disease endoscopically. Histopathological reexamination recorded thickness, width and depth of sm invasion, grade, presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), resection margin status and tumor stage. Multivariate analysis was employed to evaluate the factors influencing survival and LN metastasis. Rate of LN metastasis for pT1 low-risk (LR: sm invasion < 500 μm, G1-2, no LVI) or high-risk (HR: sm invasion >500 μm, G3-4 or LVI) disease were analyzed. Ninety three patients underwent ER and 96 underwent esophagectomy. We demonstrate conflicting histological methods of sm disease reporting, which may explain the difference in LN metastasis rate between reported surgical & endoscopic series. Multivariate analysis confirmed age, T stage, and presence of LN metastases were the independent factors predicting poor prognosis. Tumor thickness as well as grade, T stage, LVI were predictors of LN metastasis. Rates of LN metastasis are <2% in LR sm1 disease, and >15% in HR sm1 disease. Pathological reporting of sm invasion should be updated for uniform analysis of endoscopic and surgical specimens. Following rigorous histopathological examination and within a close endoscopic follow-up regimen, pT1a and pT1b LRsm1 disease may be treated with curative intent endoscopically, whereas pT1b HRsm1-sm3 disease should be offered surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jacobo Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo
- Gastroenterology, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, University of Nottingham and NIHR Nottingham BRC, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | | | - Krish Ragunath
- Gastroenterology, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, University of Nottingham and NIHR Nottingham BRC, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|