The incidences of human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) tonsillar and base tongue squamous cell carcinomas (TSCC and BOTSCC) have increased in recent decades. Notably, HPV+ TSCC and BOTSCC have a significantly better prognosis than their HPV-negative counterparts when treated with current surgical options, radiotherapy, or intensified chemoradiotherapy. However, a cure is not achieved in 20% of patients with HPV+ TSCC/BOTSCC. Meanwhile, cured patients often present with severe chronic side effects. This necessitates novel tailored alternatives, such as targeted therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and treatment de-escalation, together with better follow-up. Current precision medicine therefore focuses on detecting predictive and driver cancer genes to better stratify patient treatment, provide those with poor prognostic markers targeted therapy, and select those with favorable markers for de-escalated therapy. Moreover, detecting cell-free HPV DNA (cfHPV DNA) in plasma before and after treatment has been attempted to improve follow-up. In this context, this perspective discusses the significance of optimally defining HPV+ status, which requires HPV DNA and p16INKa overexpression, using prognostic markers, such as high CD8+ T-cell counts and HPV E2 mRNA expression, tumor size, and following cfHPV DNA for patient selection for specific therapies. Clinical trials with ICI with/without chemotherapy, targeted therapy with specific inhibitors-such as phosphoinositide 3-kinase and fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors-or immune therapy with various HPV-based vaccines for treating recurrences have yielded promising results.

The year 2024 marks the 60th anniversary of the discovery of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), the first virus confirmed to cause human cancer. Viral infections significantly contribute to the global cancer burden, with seven known Group 1 oncogenic viruses, including hepatitis B virus (HBV), human papillomavirus (HPV), EBV, Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). These oncogenic viruses induce cellular transformation and cancer development by altering various biological processes within host cells, particularly under immunosuppression or co-carcinogenic exposures. These viruses are primarily associated with hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric cancer, cervical cancer, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Kaposi sarcoma, lymphoma, and adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Understanding the mechanisms of viral oncogenesis is crucial for identifying and characterizing the early biological processes of virus-related cancers, providing new targets and strategies for treatment or prevention. This review first outlines the global epidemiology of virus-related tumors, milestone events in research, and the process by which oncogenic viruses infect target cells. It then focuses on the molecular mechanisms by which these viruses induce tumors directly or indirectly, including the regulation of oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes, induction of genomic instability, disruption of regular life cycle of cells, immune suppression, chronic inflammation, and inducing angiogenesis. Finally, current therapeutic strategies for virus-related tumors and recent advances in preclinical and clinical research are discussed.

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated malignancies continue to present a major health concern despite the development of prophylactic vaccines. Standard therapies offer limited benefit to patients with advanced-stage disease. Despite improved outcomes with programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) targeted therapies, treatment resistance and modest response rates highlight a significant unmet need to develop novel therapies for these patients. PDS0101 (designated HPV vaccine) is a liposomal nanoparticle HPV16-specific therapeutic vaccine that has been shown to generate strong HPV-specific responses in preclinical and clinical studies. Here we assess the efficacy of this HPV vaccine in combination with the tumor-targeting immunocytokine NHS-IL12 (PDS01ADC), plus either αPD-1 or the class I histone deacetylase inhibitor Entinostat.

Mice bearing HPV16+, αPD-1 refractory TC-1 and mEER tumors were treated with HPV vaccine, NHS-IL12, and either αPD-1 or Entinostat to determine antitumor efficacy and survival benefits. A comprehensive analysis of the tumor microenvironment was performed using flow cytometry, multiplex immunofluorescence, chemokine and cytokine assessment, and single-cell RNA sequencing with T-cell receptor (TCR) enrichment.

Combination of HPV vaccine and NHS-IL12 with either Entinostat or αPD-1 yielded significant antitumor activity and prolonged survival in αPD-1 refractory models of HPV16+ cancer, with superior activity employing Entinostat versus αPD-1 combination. Entinostat triple therapy increased overall and HPV16-specific tumor CD8+ T-cell infiltration with heightened cytotoxicity. TCR sequencing revealed a CD8+ T-cell clone unique to vaccine-treated cohorts, which displayed an enriched cytotoxic transcriptional profile with triple therapy. These effects were paralleled by strong differentiation of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) towards pro-inflammatory, antitumor M1-like cell states. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis indicated all three agents were required for highest modulation of both CD8+ T cells and TAMs conducive to tumor control. A biomarker signature reflecting the preclinical findings was found to be associated with improved survival in patients with HPV-associated malignancies.

Together, these findings provide a rationale for the combination of HPV vaccine, NHS-IL12, and Entinostat in the clinical setting for patients with HPV16-associated malignancies.

Over the years, there have been significant advancements in the field of cervical cancer research in developing new treatment approaches. One of the significant breakthroughs in cancer treatment is the emergence of immunotherapy that can be used as a standalone treatment or in combination with other cancer therapies. Immunotherapy has shown promising results in clinical trials and has become a viable strategy for treating cancer and improves the quality of life for cancer patients and overall survival rate. Here in the systematic review we are focusing towards the effectiveness and safety of immunotherapy in cervical cancer or HPV infections CIN with clinical trial data. The data extracted had from those studies were analyzed through certain statistical methods and subgroup analysis for validating and concluding our objective. PubMed and Science direct database were used for searching the studies with applied screening and filtering and 49 main reports were included for the studies. The immunotherapies subdivided to immune checkpoint inhibitors, cellular therapy and Vaccine were separately analysed through meta-analysis for the conclusion. The Pembrolizumab (immune checkpoint inhibitor), T cell therapy and Bivalent (Ecoli expressed) vaccine were analysed to be higher effective. Thus for future exploration on immunotherapy in cervical cancer, it was described in our studies of a combination of Ecoli rec HPV bivalent vaccine followed by Pembrolizumab or T cell therapy thus improving the immune mediated action against the cancer. Apart from that, a hypothetical model of multiepitope production on ecoli for vaccine generation has also been explained.

New treatment strategies are urgently needed for patients with advanced cervical cancer (CC). Here, a synergistic anti-CC effect of a novel combinatorial immunotherapy with adoptively transferred autologous Vγ9Vδ2 T cells and αβ T cells is shown. The pivotal role of both circulating and tumor-infiltrating Vγ9Vδ2 T cells in anti-CC immunity is uncovered. Importantly, autologous Vγ9Vδ2 T cells show a synergistic anti-CC effect with αβ T cells not only through killing tumor directly, but also by promoting the activation and tumoricidal activity of syngeneic αβ T cells through antigen presentation, which can be further boosted by conventional chemotherapy. Moreover, Vγ9Vδ2 T cells can restore the tumoricidal function of αβ T cell through competitively binding to BTN3A1, a TCR-Vγ9Vδ2 ligand on CC cells upregulated by IFN-γ derived from activated αβ T cell. These findings uncover a critical synergistic effect of autologous Vγ9Vδ2 T cells and αβ T cells in immunotherapy of CC and reveal the underlying mechanisms.

The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is rising, especially in immunosuppressed individuals, highlighting the need for new prevention strategies. Commensal human papillomaviruses (cHPVs) are associated with cutaneous SCC (cSCC) in immunosuppressed patients. Because of the intricate interactions between T cell immunity and cHPVs in virus-colonized tissues, we propose that enhancing T cell immunity against cHPVs through vaccination could suppress SCC.

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. The main aetiological factor for developing cervical cancer is the persistent infection of Human papillomavirus (HPV). The E6 and E7 oncoproteins produced by HPV mainly contribute to the carcinogenic process by inhibiting the function of tumour suppressor genes. The E6 protein causes degradation of p53 leading to impaired cellular stress response. In contrast, the E7 protein impairs the activity of retinoblastoma protein (pRb) resulting in continuous cell cycle propagation. Even though screening programmes and prophylactic vaccination have reduced the incidence of cervical cancer, the disease burden is still high, especially in low socioeconomic countries. Treatment of cervical cancer involves a multimodal strategy incorporating surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Most of these management approaches use invasive techniques and are associated with adverse effects. Drug resistance is observed over time with chemotherapeutic agents. Hence there is a crucial need for developing novel targeted treatment strategies for cervical cancer. The E6 and E7 viral oncoproteins are continuously expressed in HPV infected cells making them ideal targets for developing therapies. Therapeutic DNA vaccines, gene therapy involving RNA interference technology, and CRISPR are currently under intensive study. These technologies represent a productive and promising approach for the future treatment of cervical cancer. Moreover, several new compounds demonstrate significant anti-cancer effects against cervical cancer. This review provides an updated account of therapeutic strategies currently under research targeting the E6 and E7 viral oncoproteins.

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related lower genital cancers, including cervical cancer, anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), vaginal cancer, vulvar cancer, and penile cancer, pose a significant health burden, with approximately 45,000 new cases diagnosed annually. Current effective treatment modalities include chemoradiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The tumor microenvironment in HPV-related cancers is characterized by immune evasion mechanisms, including the modulation of immune checkpoints such as PD-L1/PD-1. HPV oncoproteins E5, E6, and E7 play crucial roles in this process, altering the expression of immune inhibitory molecules and the recruitment of immune cells. ICIs, such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, have shown efficacy in enhancing the immune response against HPV-associated tumors by blocking proteins that allow cancer cells to evade immune surveillance. Recent studies have demonstrated that HPV-positive tumors exhibit a more favorable response to ICI-based therapies compared to HPV-negative tumors. The integration of ICIs into treatment regimens for HPV-related cancers has been supported by several clinical trials. The inclusion of ICIs in the treatment approach for HPV-related lower genital cancers presents a promising opportunity for improving patient outcomes. Ongoing research and clinical trials are advancing our understanding of the immune microenvironment and the therapeutic potential of immunotherapy for these cancers.

Over the past few decades, cancer immunotherapy has experienced a significant revolution due to the advancements in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and adoptive cell therapies (ACTs), along with their regulatory approvals. In recent times, there has been hope in the effectiveness of cancer vaccines for therapy as they have been able to stimulate de novo T-cell reactions against tumor antigens. These tumor antigens include both tumor-associated antigen (TAA) and tumor-specific antigen (TSA). Nevertheless, the constant quest to fully achieve these abilities persists. Therefore, this review offers a broad perspective on the existing status of cancer immunizations. Cancer vaccine design has been revolutionized due to the advancements made in antigen selection, the development of antigen delivery systems, and a deeper understanding of the strategic intricacies involved in effective antigen presentation. In addition, this review addresses the present condition of clinical tests and deliberates on their approaches, with a particular emphasis on the immunogenicity specific to tumors and the evaluation of effectiveness against tumors. Nevertheless, the ongoing clinical endeavors to create cancer vaccines have failed to produce remarkable clinical results as a result of substantial obstacles, such as the suppression of the tumor immune microenvironment, the identification of suitable candidates, the assessment of immune responses, and the acceleration of vaccine production. Hence, there are possibilities for the industry to overcome challenges and enhance patient results in the coming years. This can be achieved by recognizing the intricate nature of clinical issues and continuously working toward surpassing existing limitations.

This first-in-human phase 1 study (NCT04432597) evaluated the safety and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of PRGN-2009, a gorilla adenoviral-vector targeting oncoproteins E6, E7 (human papillomavirus (HPV)16/18) and E5 (HPV16), as monotherapy (Arm 1A) and combined with the bifunctional TGF-β "trap"/anti-PD-L1 fusion protein bintrafusp alfa (BA; Arm 1B), in patients with recurrent/metastatic HPV-associated cancer.

Patients with ≥ 1 prior treatment (immunotherapy allowed) received PRGN-2009 (1 × 1011 particle units or 5 × 1011 particle units, subcutaneously) every 2 weeks for 3 doses, then every 4 weeks (Arm 1A), or PRGN-2009 (RP2D, schedule per Arm 1A) and BA (1200 mg, intravenously) every 2 weeks (Arm 1B). Primary endpoints were safety and RP2D of PRGN-2009; secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS).

Seventeen patients were treated. In Arm 1A (n = 6) there were no dose limiting toxicities or grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), 5 × 1011 PU was selected as RP2D, no responses were observed, and median OS (mOS) was 7.4 months (95% CI 2.9-26.8). In Arm 1B (n = 11), grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 27% of patients, ORR was 20% for all patients (22% in checkpoint-resistant patients), and mOS was 24.6 months (95% CI 9.6-not reached). Multifunctional HPV-specific T cells were increased or induced de novo in 80% of patients and not impacted by anti-vector antibodies. Higher serum IL-8 at baseline associated with shorter OS.

PRGN-2009 was well tolerated, and immune responses were observed to PRGN-2009. Encouraging anti-tumor activity and OS were noted in the combination with BA arm, consisting mainly of checkpoint-resistant patients. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04432597.

Immunotherapy has surfaced as a promising therapeutic modality for gastric cancer (GC). A comprehensive review of advancements, current status, and research trends in GC immunotherapy is essential to inform future investigative efforts.

To delineate the trends, advancements, and focal points in immunotherapy for GC.

We performed a bibliometric analysis of 2906 articles in English concerning GC immunotherapy published from 2000 to December 20, 2023, indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection. Data analysis and visualization were facilitated by CiteSpace (6.1.6R), VOSviewer v.1.6.17, and GraphPad Prism v8.0.2.

There has been an increase in the annual publication rate of GC immunotherapy research. China leads in publication volume, while the United States demonstrates the highest citation impact. Fudan University is notable for its citation frequency and publication output. Co-citation analysis and keyword frequency revealed and highlighted a focus on GC prognosis, the tumor microenvironment (TME), and integrative immunotherapy with targeted therapy. Emerging research areas include gastroesophageal junction cancer, adoptive immunotherapy, and the role of Treg cell in immunotherapy.

GC immunotherapy research is an expanding field attracting considerable scientific interest. With the clinical adoption of immunotherapy in GC, the primary goals are to enhance treatment efficacy and patient outcomes. Unlike hematological malignancies, GC's solid TME presents distinct immunological challenges that may attenuate the cytotoxic effects of immune cells on cancer cells. For instance, although CAR-T therapy is effective in hematological malignancies, it has underperformed in GC settings. Current research is centered on overcoming immunosuppression within the TME, with a focus on combinations of targeted therapy, adoptive immunotherapy, Treg cell dynamics, and precise prognosis prediction in immunotherapy. Additionally, immunotherapy's role in treating gastroesophageal junction cancer has become a novel research focus.

Advancements in personalized neoantigen-based cancer vaccines are ushering in a new era in oncology, targeting unique genetic alterations within tumors to enhance treatment precision and efficacy. Neoantigens, specific to cancer cells and absent in normal tissues, are at the heart of these vaccines, promising to direct the immune system specifically against the tumor, thereby maximizing therapeutic efficacy while minimizing side effects. The identification of neoantigens through genomic and proteomic technologies is central to developing these vaccines, allowing for the precise mapping of a tumor's mutational landscape. Despite advancements, accurately predicting which neoantigens will elicit strong immune responses remains challenging due to tumor variability and the complexity of immune system interactions. This necessitates further refinement of bioinformatics tools and predictive models. Moreover, the efficacy of these vaccines heavily depends on innovative delivery methods that enhance neoantigen presentation to the immune system. Techniques like encapsulating neoantigens in lipid nanoparticles and using viral vectors are critical for improving vaccine stability and delivery. Additionally, these vaccines contribute towards achieving Sustainable Development Goal 3.8, promoting universal health coverage by advancing access to safe and effective cancer treatments. This review delves into the potential of neoantigen-based vaccines to transform cancer treatment, examining both revolutionary advancements and the ongoing challenges they face.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors has recently become a promising and innovative therapeutic option for patients suffering from advanced recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer(CC), and several studies of immunotherapy have been published or have revealed stage-by-stage results at international congresses. Nevertheless, there is a lack of meta-analyses of ICIs for advanced CC in past Meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis rigorously followed the PRISMA guidelines, using Review Manager V.5.4 and R(v4.2.2) software for data synthesis. Hazard ratios, risk ratios, and risk differences were calculated, with statistical significance assessed via the Mantel-Haenszel test. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the Higgins I2 statistic, and sensitivity analyses were conducted if heterogeneity surpassed 50%. The efficacy outcomes examined and gathered included the overall response rate (ORR), progress-free survival, overall survival(OS), and the adverse events (AEs), crucial for understanding the efficacy and safety of ICIs in advanced cervical cancer.

The results demonstrate significant efficacy and manageable safety of ICIs in advanced cervical cancer. In RCTs, ICIs improved OS (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.58-0.75, P < 0.00001) and PFS (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.59-0.75, P < 0.0001), with a 34% and 33% reduction in death and progression risks, respectively. ORR was higher in ICIs groups (RR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.08-1.80, P = 0.01). Single-arm studies supported these findings (ORR: RD = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.22-0.40, P < 0.0001). Safety profiles were manageable, with comparable TRAEs in RCTs and higher incidences in single-arm studies. Subgroup analysis revealed superior OS benefits in PD-L1-positive patients (CPS ≥1, HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.50-0.84, P = 0.001) and significant efficacy in squamous cell carcinoma (HR = 0.67, P < 0.00001). Sensitivity analysis confirmed robust OS results (I² = 0%) and stable ORR despite heterogeneity. Risk of bias was low to moderate.

Our meta-analysis reveals that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) significantly prolong overall survival in advanced cervical cancer patients, reducing the hazard ratio for death. Despite heterogeneity in outcomes, ICIs offer substantial treatment benefits. Further research is needed to optimize usage and monitor AEs.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023387789.

The administration of second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in previously treated patients with advanced solid cancers has been clinically investigated. However, previous clinical trials lacked an appropriate primary endpoint for efficacy assessment. This systematic review aimed to explore the most optimal early efficacy endpoint for such trials.

Phase 2 or 3 clinical trials involving patients with advanced solid cancers with disease progression following standard first-line therapy receiving second-line or subsequent ICI administration, with adequate survival outcome data, were included from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases before February 2023. Quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized trials, respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 3, 6, and 9 months were investigated as potential early efficacy endpoint candidates for 12-month overall survival (OS), with a strong correlation defined as Pearson's correlation coefficient r ≥ 0.8.

A total of 64 RCTs comprising 22,725 patients and 106 non-randomized prospective trials involving 10,608 participants were eligible for modeling and external validation, respectively. RCTs examined 15 different cancer types, predominantly non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (17, 28%), melanoma (9, 14%), and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (5, 8%). The median sample size of RCTs was 124 patients, and the median follow-up time was 3.2-57.7 months. The ORR (r = 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.54) and PFS (r = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.14-0.64) exhibited weak trial-level correlations with OS. Within ICI treatment arms, the r values of ORR and 3-, 6-, and 9-month PFS with 12-month OS were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.37-0.79), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.88), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.90), and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.90), respectively. External validation of 6-month PFS indicated an acceptable discrepancy between actual and predicted 12-month OS.

In non-randomized phase 2 trials on second-line or subsequent ICI therapy in patients with advanced solid cancers, 6-month PFS could serve as an early efficacy endpoint. However, early efficacy endpoints are not recommended in RCTs to replace OS.

Since the introduction of prophylactic HPV vaccines, both HPV infection rates and cervical cancer rates have subsequently dropped. Yet, cervical cancer remains the fourth most common cancer diagnosis in women globally. As HPV and its role in the development of cervical cancer become better understood, vaccines have emerged as a front runner for improved therapeutic cervical cancer treatment. Recent studies have shown that protein and DNA vaccines may be effectively delivered via the use of several different vectors, while combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors provides even more effective treatment. Further investigation and additional clinical studies into specific vaccine strategies are necessary to determine how effective vaccines are as therapeutic treatment for cervical cancer. This review intends to summarize some of the most promising research on cervical cancer vaccines. Such a study may be helpful for gynecologists to prevent and manage patients with HPV infection.

Cancer continues to be a major global health burden, with high morbidity and mortality. Building on the success of immune checkpoint inhibitors and adoptive cellular therapy, cancer vaccines have garnered significant interest, but their clinical success remains modest. Benefiting from advancements in technology, many meticulously designed cancer vaccines have shown promise, warranting further investigations to reach their full potential. Cancer vaccines hold unique benefits, particularly for patients resistant to other therapies, and they offer the ability to initiate broad and durable T cell responses. In this review, we highlight the antigen selection for cancer vaccines, introduce the immune responses induced by vaccines, and propose strategies to enhance vaccine immunogenicity. Furthermore, we summarize key features and notable clinical advances of various vaccine platforms. Lastly, we delve into the mechanisms of tumor resistance and explore the potential benefits of combining cancer vaccines with standard treatments and other immunomodulatory approaches to improve vaccine efficacy.

Human papillomaviruses, particularly high-risk human papillomaviruses, have been universally considered to be associated with the oncogenesis and progression of various cancers. The genome of human papillomaviruses is circular, double-stranded DNA that encodes early and late proteins. Each of the proteins is of crucial significance in infecting the epithelium of host cells persistently and supporting viral genome integrating into host cells. Notably, E6 and E7 proteins, classified as oncoproteins, trigger the incidence of cancers by fostering cell proliferation, hindering apoptosis, evading immune surveillance, promoting cell invasion, and disrupting the balance of cellular metabolism. Therefore, targeting human papillomaviruses and decoding molecular mechanisms by which human papillomaviruses drive carcinogenesis are of great necessity to better treat human papillomaviruses-related cancers. Human papillomaviruses have been applied clinically to different facets of human papillomavirus-related cancers, including prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Several types of prophylactic vaccines have been publicly utilized worldwide and have greatly decreased the occurrence of human papillomavirus-related cancers, which have benefited numerous people. Although various therapeutic vaccines have been developed and tested clinically, none of them have been officially approved to date. Enhancing the efficacy of vaccines and searching for innovative technologies targeting human papillomaviruses remain critical challenges that warrant continuous research and attention in the future.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a major global health issue and is recognized as the leading cause of cervical cancer. While prophylactic vaccination programs have led to substantial reductions in both HPV infection rates and cervical cancer incidence, considerable burdens of HPV-related diseases persist, particularly in developing countries with inadequate vaccine coverage and uptake. The development of therapeutic vaccines for HPV represents an emerging strategy that has the potential to bolster the fight against cervical cancer. Unlike current prophylactic vaccines designed to prevent new infections, therapeutic vaccines aim to eradicate or treat existing HPV infections, as well as HPV-associated precancers and cancers. This review focuses on clinical studies involving therapeutic HPV vaccines for cervical cancer, specifically in three key areas: the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; the treatment of cervical cancer in combination with or without chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immune checkpoint inhibitors; and the role of prophylaxis following completion of treatment. Currently, there are no approved therapeutic HPV vaccines worldwide; however, active progress is being made in clinical research and development using multiple platforms such as peptides, proteins, DNA, RNA, bacterial vectors, viral vectors, and cell-based, each offering relative advantages and limitations for delivering HPV antigens and generating targeted immune responses. We outline preferred vaccine parameters, including indications, target populations, safety considerations, efficacy considerations, and immunization strategies. Lastly, we emphasize that therapeutic vaccines for HPV that are currently under development could be an important new tool in fighting against cervical cancer.

Clinically, multimodal therapies are adopted worldwide for the management of cancer, which continues to be a leading cause of death. In recent years, immunotherapy has firmly established itself as a new paradigm in cancer care that activates the body's immune defense to cope with cancer. Immunotherapy has resulted in significant breakthroughs in the treatment of stubborn tumors, dramatically improving the clinical outcome of cancer patients. Multiple forms of cancer immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), adoptive cell therapy and cancer vaccines, have become widely available. However, the effectiveness of these immunotherapies is not much satisfying. Many cancer patients do not respond to immunotherapy, and disease recurrence appears to be unavoidable because of the rapidly evolving resistance. Moreover, immunotherapies can give rise to severe off-target immune-related adverse events. Strategies to remove these hindrances mainly focus on the development of combinatorial therapies or the exploitation of novel immunotherapeutic mediations. Nanomaterials carrying anticancer agents to the target site are considered as practical approaches for cancer treatment. Nanomedicine combined with immunotherapies offers the possibility to potentiate systemic antitumor immunity and to facilitate selective cytotoxicity against cancer cells in an effective and safe manner. A myriad of nano-enabled cancer immunotherapies are currently under clinical investigation. Owing to gaps between preclinical and clinical studies, nano-immunotherapy faces multiple challenges, including the biosafety of nanomaterials and clinical trial design. In this review, we provide an overview of cancer immunotherapy and summarize the evidence indicating how nanomedicine-based approaches increase the efficacy of immunotherapies. We also discuss the key challenges that have emerged in the era of nanotechnology-based cancer immunotherapy. Taken together, combination nano-immunotherapy is drawing increasing attention, and it is anticipated that the combined treatment will achieve the desired success in clinical cancer therapy.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a prevalent infection affecting both men and women, leading to various cytological lesions. Therapeutic vaccines mount a HPV-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte response, thus clearing HPV-infected cells. However, no therapeutic vaccines targeting HPV are currently approved for clinical treatment due to limited efficacy. Our goal is to develop a vaccine that can effectively eliminate tumors caused by HPV.

We genetically fused the chemokine XCL1 with the E6 and E7 proteins of HPV16 to target cDC1 and enhance the vaccine-induced cytotoxic T cell response, ultimately developing a DNA vaccine. Additionally, we screened various interleukins and identified IL-9 as an effective molecular adjuvant for our DNA vaccine.

The fusion of Xcl1 significantly improved the quantity and quality of the specific CD8+ T cells. The fusion of Xcl1 also increased immune cell infiltration into the tumor microenvironment. The inclusion of IL-9 significantly elevated the vaccine-induced specific T cell response and enhanced anti-tumor efficacy. IL-9 promotes the formation of central memory T cells.

the fusion of Xcl1 and the use of IL-9 as a molecular adjuvant represent promising strategies for vaccine development.

Therapeutic human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA vaccine is an attractive option to control existed HPV infection and related lesions. The two early viral oncoproteins, E6 and E7, are continuously expressed in most HPV-related pre- and cancerous cells, and are ideal targets for therapeutic vaccines. We have previously developed an HPV 16 DNA vaccine encoding a modified E7/HSP70 (mE7/HSP70) fusion protein, which demonstrated significant antitumor effects in murine models. In this study, we employed multifaceted approach to enhance the potency of the HPV16 DNA vaccine. Strategies including inserting CpG oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG ODNs) into the vaccine vector backbone, selecting cytokine gene adjuvants, combining plasmids encoding mE6/HSP70 and mE7/HSP70, and utilizing electroporation for vaccination. Our findings revealed that mice immunized with CpG-modified vaccines, coupled with an IL-28B gene adjuvant exhibited heightened antigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses. Additionally, the combination of mE6/HSP70 and mE7/HSP70 plasmids synergistically enhanced the specific CD8+ T cell response. Furthermore, vaccination with CpG-modified mE7/HSP70 and mE6/HSP70 plasmids, alongside the Interleukin-28B (IL-28B) gene adjuvant, generated substantial preventive and therapeutic antitumor effects against HPV E6- and E7-expressing tumors in C57BL/6 mice. These results suggested that integrating these multiple strategies into an HPV DNA vaccine holds promise for effectively controlling HPV infection and related diseases.

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cause of morbidity and mortality in women. The major causative factor for cervical cancer is primary prolonged infection with human papillomavirus, along with secondary factors such as immunodeficiency, smoking, low socioeconomic standards, poor hygiene, and overuse of oral contraceptives. A grave need exists to practice novel strategies to overcome existing drawbacks of conventional therapy such as chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. Cancer immunotherapy works by strengthening the immune system of the host to combat against the cancerous cells. Immunotherapy in cervical cancer treatment has demonstrated long-lasting effects; however, the response to such therapies was nominal due to its prominent limitations such as immunosuppressive behavior of the tumor. Presently plethora of nanoplatforms such as polymeric nanoparticles, micelles, liposomes, and dendrimers are being maneuvered with cancer immunotherapy. The amalgamation of nanotechnology and immunotherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer is conceivable due to the mutual association between the tumor microenvironment and immunosurveillance. Safety concerns of nanoplatforms with immunotherapeutics such as toxicity, inflammation, and unwanted accumulation in tissues could be surmounted by surface modification methods. This review highlights the benefits of the amalgamation of nanotechnology and immunotherapy to improve shortcomings applicable to the conventional delivery of cancer treatment. We also aim to outline the nanoimmunotherapy sophistications and future translational avenues in this rapidly flourishing cancer treatment modality.

Hepatocellular carcinoma is the sixth most common tumor and the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide. It ranks fourth in the spectrum of malignant tumor incidence and second in the order of death from major malignant tumors in China. Hepatocellular carcinoma is a complex ecosystem containing non-tumor cells (mainly immune-related cells), and its immunotherapy can stimulate the recognition of specific tumor antigens, inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells, and produce over-memory lymphocytes, which can prevent recurrence. So, immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma is increasingly becoming a research hotspot in liver cancer treatment. With the intensive research in recent years, great progress has been made in immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, pericyte therapy, vaccination, and antiviral therapy. In addition, the study found that the therapeutic effect of combination therapy was enhanced compared to monotherapy. This review summarizes the most prominent immunotherapies currently available for the clinical treatment of patients with HCC and the main opportunities and challenges facing HCC research.

Tumor vaccines, as an immunotherapeutic approach, harness the body's immune cells to provoke antitumor responses, which have shown promising efficacy in clinical settings. However, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and the ineffective vaccine delivery systems hinder the progression of many vaccines beyond phase II trials. This article begins with a comprehensive review of the complex interactions between tumor vaccines and TME, summarizing the current state of vaccine clinical research. Subsequently, we review recent advancements in targeted vaccine delivery systems and explore biomaterial-based tumor vaccines as a strategy to improve the efficacy of both delivery systems and treatment. Finally, we have presented our perspectives on tumor vaccine development, aiming to advance the field towards the creation of more effective tumor vaccines.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically transformed the treatment landscape for various malignancies, achieving notable clinical outcomes across a wide range of indications. Despite these advances, resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) remains a critical clinical challenge, characterized by variable response rates and non-durable benefits. However, growing research into the complex intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics of tumors has advanced our understanding of the mechanisms behind ICI resistance, potentially improving treatment outcomes. Additionally, robust predictive biomarkers are crucial for optimizing patient selection and maximizing the efficacy of ICBs. Recent studies have emphasized that multiple rational combination strategies can overcome immune checkpoint resistance and enhance susceptibility to ICIs. These findings not only deepen our understanding of tumor biology but also reveal the unique mechanisms of action of sensitizing agents, extending clinical benefits in cancer immunotherapy. In this review, we will explore the underlying biology of ICIs, discuss the significance of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and clinical predictive biomarkers, analyze the current mechanisms of resistance, and outline alternative combination strategies to enhance the effectiveness of ICIs, including personalized strategies for sensitizing tumors to ICIs.

This meta-analysis seeks to assess the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in individuals with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer.

Databases from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were all thoroughly searched for pertinent research. Outcomes include complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), disease progression (PD), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), and adverse events (AEs) were retrieved for further analysis.

Ten trials with 721 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results for patients with cervical cancer receiving pembrolizumab were as follows: CR (0.06, 95%CI: 0.02-0.10), PR (0.15, 95%CI: 0.08-0.22), SD (0.16, 95%CI: 0.13-0.20), PD (0.50, 95%CI: 0.25-0.75), ORR (0.26, 95%CI: 0.11-0.41) and DCR (0.42, 95%CI: 0.13-0.71), respectively. Regarding survival analysis, the pooled mPFS and mOS were 3.81 and 10.15 months. Subgroup analysis showed that pembrolizumab in combination was more beneficial in CR (0.16 vs. 0.03, p = 0.012), PR (0.24 vs. 0.08, p = 0.032), SD (0.11 vs. 0.19, p = 0.043), ORR (0.42 vs. 0.11, p = 0.014), and mPFS (5.54 months vs. 2.27 months, p < 0.001) than as single agent. The three most common AEs were diarrhoea (0.25), anaemia (0.25), and nausea (0.21), and the incidence of grade 3-5 AEs was significantly lower, rarely surpassing 0.10.

For patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer, this systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that pembrolizumab had a favourable efficacy and tolerability. Future research will primarily focus on optimising customised regiments that optimally integrate pembrolizumab into new therapies and combination strategies. Designed to maximise patient benefit and efficiently control adverse effects while maintaining a high standard of living.

Recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (r/m CC) presents limited treatment options for patients failed or progressed quickly following first-line therapy. This study investigated the potential of sintilimab with a prophylactic human papillomavirus (HPV) quadrivalent vaccine as a second-line treatment for r/m CC.

In this phase 2 clinical trial, patients with r/m CC previously unresponsive or intolerant to standard treatments for metastatic or recurrent lesions were enrolled. Participants received sintilimab (3 mg/kg for body weight <60 kg; 200 mg for ≥60 kg) every 3 weeks until 24 months or 35 cycles and 3 doses of the HPV quadrivalent vaccine (initial dose prior to sintilimab initiation, with subsequent doses at 2 and 6 months). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). A Simon two-stage optimal design was used.

From October 2019 to October 2022, 13 patients with r/m CC were enrolled. ORR achieved 53.8% (95% CI 25.1% to 80.8%), and the disease control rate was 76.9% (95% CI 46.2% to 95.0%). Median follow-up duration was 16.07 months (range: 3.64-48.2 months), and median progressive free survival was 7.16 months (95% CI 1.91 -not applicable (NA)). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached (95% CI 9.89 -NA). Hypothyroidism (15.6%) was the most common treatment-related adverse event (AE). No grade 3 or above AEs were observed.

This study suggests the combination of sintilimab plus prophylactic HPV vaccine offers a potentially promising therapeutic strategy for patients with r/m CC unresponsive or intolerant to standard therapies.Trial registration numberNCT04096911.

Virus-like particles (VLPs) are naturally occurring delivery platforms with potential for mRNA vaccines that can be used as an alternative to lipid nanoparticles. Here we describe a self-amplifying mRNA vaccine based on tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) expressing a mutated E7 protein from human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16). E7 is an early gene that plays a central role in viral replication and the oncogenic transformation of host cells, but nononcogenic mutant E7 proteins can suppress this activity. Immunization studies involving the delivery of self-amplifying mutant E7 mRNA packaged with TMV coat proteins confirmed the elicitation of E7-specific IgG antibodies. Additional in vitro splenocyte proliferation and cytokine profiling assays indicated the activation of humoral and cellular immune responses. We conclude that TMV particles are suitable for the delivery of mRNA vaccines and can preserve their integrity and functionality in vitro and in vivo.

DNA vaccines are prospective for their efficient manufacturing process, but their immunogenicity is limited as they cannot efficiently induce CD8+ T cell responses. A promising approach is to induce cross-presentation by targeting antigens to DCs. Flt3L can expand the number of type 1 conventional DCs and thereby improve cross-presentation. In this study, we first constructed a DNA vaccine expressing soluble PD1 and found that the therapeutic effect of targeting DCs with only the sPD1 vaccine was limited. When combined the vaccine with Flt3L, the anti-tumor effect was significantly enhanced. Considering the complexity of tumors and that a single method may not be able to activate a large number of effective CD8+ T cells, we combined different drugs and the vaccine with Flt3L based on the characteristics of different tumors. In 4T1 model, we reduced Tregs through cyclophosphamide. In Panc02 model, we increased activated DCs by using aCD40. Both strategies triggered strong CD8+ T cell responses and significantly improved the therapeutic effect. Our study provides important support for the clinical exploration of DC-targeted DNA vaccines in combination with Flt3L.

Due to the high heterogeneity and the immunosuppressive microenvironment of tumors, most single antigen tumor vaccines often fail to elicit potent antitumor immune responses in clinical trials, resulting in unsatisfactory therapy effects. Hence, personalized tumor vaccines have become a promising modality for cancer immunotherapy. Here, we have developed a tumor in situ hydrogel vaccine (AH/DA-OR) capable of rapid hemostasis for personalized tumor immunotherapy, composed of dopamine-grafted hyaluronic acid (HA/DA) combined with sodium alginate (ALG), with coloaded oxaliplatin (OXA) and resiquimod (R848). The ALG and HA framework imparts excellent biocompatibility to the hydrogel, and dopamine (DA) modification endows it with rapid hemostatic functionality. Following local peritumor injection of AH/DA-OR into the tumor, the in situ hydrogel vaccine achieved the sustained release of the chemotherapeutic agent, OXA, inducing immunogenic cell death in tumor cells and effectively releasing personalized tumor-associated antigens to activate immune responses. Simultaneously, local R848 adjuvant sustained release at the tumor site enhanced immune responses, minimized drug side effects, and amplified immunotherapy effects. Finally, the hydrogel vaccine effectively activated host immune responses to suppress CT26 colorectal cancer growth in vivo, also exhibiting superior inhibition of untreated tumor growth at distant sites. This strategy of rapid hemostasis of tumor in situ hydrogel vaccine holds significant clinical potential and provides a paradigm for achieving secure and robust immunotherapy.

For best efficacy, vaccines must provide long-lasting immunity. To measure longevity, memory from B and T cells are surrogate endpoints for vaccine efficacy. When antibodies are insufficient for protection, the immune response must rely on T cells. The magnitude and differentiation of effective, durable immune responses depend on antigen-specific precursor frequencies. However, development of vaccines that induce durable T-cell responses for cancer treatment has remained elusive.

To address long-lasting immunity, patients with HER2+ (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) advanced stage cancer received HER2/neu targeted vaccines. Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot measuring HER2/neu IFN-γ T cells were analyzed from 86 patients from three time points: baseline, 1 month after vaccine series, and long-term follow-up at 1 year, following one in vitro stimulation. The baseline and 1-month post-vaccine series responses were correlated with immunity at long-term follow-up by logistic regression. Immunity was modeled by non-linear functions using generalized additive models.

Antigen-specific T-cell responses at baseline were associated with a 0.33-log increase in response at long-term follow-up, 95% CI (0.11, 0.54), p=0.003. 63% of patients that had HER2/neu specific T cells at baseline continued to have responses at long-term follow-up. Increased HER2/neu specific T-cell response 1 month after the vaccine series was associated with a 0.47-log increase in T-cell response at long-term follow-up, 95% CI (0.27, 0.67), p=2e-5. 74% of patients that had an increased IFN-γ HER2 response 1 month after vaccines retained immunity long-term. As the 1-month post-vaccination series precursor frequency of HER2+IFN-γ T-cell responses increased, the probability of retaining these responses long-term increased (OR=1.49 for every one natural log increase of precursor frequency, p=0.0002), reaching an OR of 20 for a precursor frequency of 1:3,000 CONCLUSIONS: Patients not destined to achieve long-term immunity can be identified immediately after completing the vaccine series. Log-fold increases in antigen-specific precursor frequencies after vaccinations correlate with increased odds of retaining long-term HER2 immune responses. Further vaccine boosting or immune checkpoint inhibitors or other immune stimulator therapy should be explored in patients that do not develop antigen-specific T-cell responses to improve overall response rates.

Locally advanced cervical carcinoma (LACC) remains a significant global health challenge owing to its high recurrence rates and poor outcomes, despite current treatments. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive risk stratification model for LACC by integrating Cox regression and competing risk analyses. This was done to improve clinical decision making. We analyzed data from 3428 patients with LACC registered in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and diagnosed them between 2010 and 2015. Cox regression and competing risk analyses were used to identify the prognostic factors. We constructed and validated nomograms for overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Multivariate Cox regression identified key prognostic factors for OS, including advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, age, marital status, ethnicity, and tumor size. Notably, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IIIA, IIIB, and IVA had hazard ratios of 2.227, 2.451, and 4.852, respectively, significantly increasing the mortality risk compared to stage IB2. Ethnic disparities were evident, with African Americans facing a 39.8% higher risk than Caucasians did. Competing risk analyses confirmed the significance of these factors in DSS, particularly tumor size. Our nomogram demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with area under the curve values ranging from 0.706 to 0.784 for DSS and 0.717 to 0.781 for OS. Calibration plots and decision curve analyses further validated the clinical utility of this nomogram. We present effective nomograms for LACC risk stratification that incorporate multiple prognostic factors. These models provide a refined approach for individualized patient management and have the potential to significantly enhance therapeutic strategies for LACC.

Although therapeutic human papillomavirus vaccines could offer a noninvasive treatment for patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, none has been clinically implemented. Oral administration of the therapeutic human papillomavirus vaccine IGMKK16E7 results in the histological regression of human papillomavirus 16-positive cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 to normal (complete response). We investigated biomarkers that could predict complete response after oral administration of IGMKK16E7.

Forty-two patients administered high-dose oral IGMKK16E7 in a phase I/II trial were included. Cervix-exfoliated cells were collected before vaccine administration. Gene expression of CD4, CD8, FOXP3, programmed cell death 1 protein, CTLA4, CD103, CD28, CD80, CD86, and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 in the cells was measured by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to explore potential biomarkers. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was used to correlate gene expression profiles with clinical outcome.

The only predictive biomarker of vaccine response for which receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed significant diagnostic performance with histological complete response was CD86 (area under the curve = 0.71, 95% confidence interval = 0.53 to 0.88, P = .020). Patients with complete response had significantly lower CD86 expression (CD86-low) than patients with no complete response (P = .035). The complete response rates for CD86-low and CD86-high patients were 50% and 19%, respectively, and CD86-low patients had a significantly higher complete response rate (P = .047). Compared with all patients, the CD86-low group had a 1.5-fold increase in the complete response rate. Gene expression of CD86 and CTLA4 showed the strongest positive correlation with clinical outcomes in the incomplete response group (P < .001).

Low expression of CD86 in exfoliated cervical cells can be used as a pretreatment biomarker to predict histological complete response after IGMKK16E7 administration.

Recent breakthroughs in cancer immunotherapies have emphasized the importance of harnessing the immune system for treating cancer. Vaccines, which have traditionally been used to promote protective immunity against pathogens, are now being explored as a method to target cancer neoantigens. Over the past few years, extensive preclinical research and more than a hundred clinical trials have been dedicated to investigating various approaches to neoantigen discovery and vaccine formulations, encouraging development of personalized medicine. Nucleic acids (DNA and mRNA) have become particularly promising platform for the development of these cancer immunotherapies. This shift towards nucleic acid-based personalized vaccines has been facilitated by advancements in molecular techniques for identifying neoantigens, antigen prediction methodologies, and the development of new vaccine platforms. Generating these personalized vaccines involves a comprehensive pipeline that includes sequencing of patient tumor samples, data analysis for antigen prediction, and tailored vaccine manufacturing. In this review, we will discuss the various shared and personalized antigens used for cancer vaccine development and introduce strategies for identifying neoantigens through the characterization of gene mutation, transcription, translation and post translational modifications associated with oncogenesis. In addition, we will focus on the most up-to-date nucleic acid vaccine platforms, discuss the limitations of cancer vaccines as well as provide potential solutions, and raise key clinical and technical considerations in vaccine development.

Radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy is a standard method for treating locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely applied in the treatment of recurrent cervical cancer, metastatic cervical cancer or LACC. The efficacy and safety of radiotherapy plus immunotherapy for LACC require further investigation. The objective of this review and meta-analysis was to analyze the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) combined with ICIs for treating LACC on the basis of the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

We comprehensively searched electronic databases to identify RCTs that focused on CCRT plus ICIs for LACC treatment. The outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). A standard method for systematic review and meta-analysis was used. Review Manager 5.4 was used for data combination and analyses.

Three RCTs involving 1882 participants with LACC were identified and included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. CCRT plus ICIs improved the rates of PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: CI: 0.64, 0.91, P = 0.002) and OS (HR: 0.7695% CI (95% CI 0.58-0.99, P = 0.04) in patients with LACC. Compared with the control group, the CCRT plus immunotherapy group had an increased ORR (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.02,1.85, P=0.04). The two methods had similar rates (HR=1.99, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.43; P=0.07) of treatment-related grade 3 or higher AEs. The CCRT plus immunotherapy group had a higher rate than did the control group (HR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.38, 5.21; P=0.004) in terms of any grade immunotherapy-related AEs.

CCRT plus ICIs is efficacious and safe for the management of LACC. The addition of ICIs to CCRT improved the rates of PFS and OS in patients with LACC. The adverse effects of immunotherapy-related AEs should be strictly examined and managed in a timely manner.