1
|
Zhang H, Pan H, Chen X. Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block for gastric surgery: a meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol 2025; 25:225. [PMID: 40316918 PMCID: PMC12049037 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-025-03097-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2025] [Indexed: 05/04/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multimodal analgesia is an important component of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS). Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block helps achieve this pain management in various types of surgeries. To evaluate the efficacy of TAP block versus non-TAP approaches for postoperative pain management and recovery after gastric surgery. METHODS A systematic literature search across four databases (Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed) until February 2024 identified relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating TAP block in gastric surgery. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed analyses. PRIMARY OUTCOME postoperative pain scores. SECONDARY OUTCOMES postoperative opioid consumption, hospital stay, time to ambulation, and time to flatus. RESULTS Twelve RCTs involving 841 participants were included. Compared to non-TAP, the TAP group demonstrated significantly lower visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively (WMD range: -0.62 to -0.97). Time to first ambulation (SMD - 0.46; 95% CI: -0.92, 0.00) and first flatus (WMD - 5.17; 95% CI: -8.58, -1.77) were shorter in the TAP group. Postoperative opioid consumption was reduced with TAP (WMD - 1.89; 95% CI: -2.41, -1.37), with no difference in hospital stay between groups. CONCLUSION TAP block effectively relieves pain after gastric surgery, decreases postoperative morphine requirements, and modestly shortens bed rest duration while promoting intestinal function recovery. However, it does not significantly affect the overall hospital length of stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Zhang
- Department of general surgery, Chongqing Western Hospital, Jiulongpo District Chongqing, Chongqing, 400050, China
| | - Hong Pan
- Department of general surgery, Chongqing Western Hospital, Jiulongpo District Chongqing, Chongqing, 400050, China
| | - Xiaodong Chen
- Department of general surgery, Chongqing Western Hospital, Jiulongpo District Chongqing, Chongqing, 400050, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Carvello M, Maroli A, Wickramasinghe D, Di Candido F, Dal Buono A, Armuzzi A, Warusavitarne J, Spinelli A. Predicting conversion to tailor patient expectations and perioperative pain management in ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease. Updates Surg 2025:10.1007/s13304-025-02171-8. [PMID: 40266473 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-025-02171-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/09/2025] [Indexed: 04/24/2025]
Abstract
This study aims to identify risk factors of conversion to open surgery for patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for their CD and to develop a predictive scoring system. Data from patients undergoing minimally invasive resection for their CD were collected in two European referral centers. The scoring system was developed from a logistic regression model including clinical and operative variables and its performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) area under the curve (AUC). The study included 309 patients including surgery for recurrence. Conversion to open surgery occurred in 21% (65/309) of patients. The logistic regression analysis identified male sex, BMI, preoperative evidence of multiple disease localizations and abscess or perforation, and previous surgery for CD as independent risk factors for conversion. The risk score values in the converted group were significantly higher compared to non-converted group (MD = - 20.40; 95%CI - 14.12 to - 26.69; p < 0.0001). In the ROC analysis, the score achieved an AUC of 0.80 (SE = 0.03; 95%CI 0.74-0.86; p < 0.0001). Male sex, BMI, preoperative evidence of multiple disease localizations and abscess or perforation, and previous surgery for CD were associated with an increased risk of conversion to open surgical approach in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery and were used to develop a predictive score. The results of this study might be useful to tailor patient expectations and perioperative pain management in ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Carvello
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Milan, Italy
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Alessandro Manzoni 56Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Annalisa Maroli
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Alessandro Manzoni 56Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Di Candido
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Alessandro Manzoni 56Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Arianna Dal Buono
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Milan, Italy
- Department of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Armuzzi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Milan, Italy
- Department of Gastroenterology, IBD Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4Pieve Emanuele, 20090, Milan, Italy.
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Alessandro Manzoni 56Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khersonsky J, Alavi M, Yap EN, Campbell CI. Impact of Fascial Plane Block on Postoperative Length of Stay and Opioid Use Among Colectomy Patients Within an Established Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Pain Res 2025; 18:689-699. [PMID: 39963341 PMCID: PMC11831477 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s475139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2025] [Indexed: 02/20/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Use of fascial plane blocks is increasing yet their impact on hospital length of stay (LOS) and opioid use within the context of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway has been inconclusive. We address this gap by examining the impact of fascial plane blocks on postoperative LOS and opioid use for colorectal surgical procedures in a hospital setting with a robust ERAS program. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from a large, integrated health care delivery system with an established ERAS program in Northern California. Patients include adults who underwent non-emergent laparoscopic (n=5496) or non-laparoscopic (n=708) colectomy surgery from January 1, 2015 to May 20, 2021. The main exposure was type of anesthesia: general with long-acting fascial plane block, general with short-acting fascial plane block, or general only. Outcomes included postoperative LOS and average daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME) up to three days post-surgery. Results Most patients were older than age 50 (86% laparoscopic; 83% non-laparoscopic), female (52% laparoscopic; 58% non-laparoscopic), and non-Hispanic White (64% laparoscopic; 62% non-laparoscopic). In LOS adjusted models for laparoscopic and non-laparoscopic surgery, there was no significant difference for LOS with general with long-acting fascial plane block or with general with short-acting fascial plane block, compared to general only. In MME adjusted models for laparoscopic surgery, general with short-acting fascial plane block was associated with higher MME compared with general only (RE: 1.14,[95% CI: 1.03-1.25], p-value=0.01). However, in non-laparoscopic surgery, general with long-acting fascial plane block was associated with lower MME (RE: 0.63, [95% CI: 0.42-0.93], p-value=0.02), compared with general only. Conclusion Fascial plane blocks did not impact postoperative LOS in either surgical group but long acting resulted in lower overall postoperative opioid use for non-laparoscopic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Khersonsky
- Department of Anesthesia Vallejo Medical Center, The Permanente Medical Group, Vallejo, CA, USA
| | - Mubarika Alavi
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton, CA, USA
| | - Edward N Yap
- Department of Anesthesia South San Francisco Medical Center, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Cynthia I Campbell
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Katz J, Bok SS, Dizdarevic A. The Role of Regional Anesthesia in ICU Pain Management. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2025; 29:21. [PMID: 39777576 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01328-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to provide the most recent update and summary on the consideration, benefits and application of regional anesthesia in the ICU setting, as it pertains to the management of perioperative pain. RECENT FINDINGS Regional anesthesia and analgesia have become ubiquitous in the perioperative setting, with numerous indications and benefits. As integral part of the multimodal analgesia approach, various regional blocks have been increasingly utilized in critically ill patients. We focus this review on various regional techniques employed for critically ill patients after cardiac, thoracic, and major abdominal surgery, including neuraxial and novel truncal blocks. Effective pain management in critically ill patients poses many challenges and is extremely important. Regional anesthesia, in combination with other analgesia modalities, while still under-utilized, can help reduce acute perioperative pain, stress response, opioid use and related side effects and expedite recovery and improve clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jared Katz
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Knab K, Aurnhammer L, Büttner S, Seyfried S, Herrle F, Reissfelder C, Vassilev G, Hardt J. Comparison of early postoperative recovery in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery before and after ERAS® implementation-a single center three-armed cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2024; 39:194. [PMID: 39623070 PMCID: PMC11611963 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04770-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/22/2024] [Indexed: 12/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study examines the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) on patient recovery after elective colorectal surgery. The innovative PostopQRS™ tool was used for the analysis of patient recovery. METHODS This single-center study compares three cohorts: two retrospective cohorts before (A) and after (B) ERAS® implementation and a prospective cohort post-ERAS® implementation (C) using PostopQRS™. The present study was prospectively registered in the German Register of Clinical Trials (DRKS00026903). RESULTS A total of 153 patients were included from June 2020 to February 2022. Significant differences were observed in bowel function, oral food intake, opioid use, and PONV (postoperative nausea and vomiting) occurrence. By the day of discharge, 98% in cohorts B and C had bowel movements or stoma output, compared to 66% in cohort A (p < 0.001). Solid food intake on POD1 was higher in cohorts B and C (p = 0.025), while opioid use was lower (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001). Cohort C showed 90% recovery on discharge. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates improved early mobility, reduced need for opioids, a higher rate of patients with solid food intake on POD1, and earlier bowel movement as well as excellent recovery following the colorectal ERAS® implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Knab
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, D-68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Leon Aurnhammer
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, D-68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sylvia Büttner
- Department of Biometry and Statistics, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, D-68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Steffen Seyfried
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, D-68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Florian Herrle
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, D-68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christoph Reissfelder
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, D-68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Georgi Vassilev
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, D-68167, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Julia Hardt
- Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, D-68167, Mannheim, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Albalawi HIH, Alyoubi RKA, Alsuhaymi NMM, Aldossary FAK, Mohammed G AA, Albishi FM, Aljeddawi J, Najm FAO, Najem NA, Almarhoon MMA. Beyond the Operating Room: A Narrative Review of Enhanced Recovery Strategies in Colorectal Surgery. Cureus 2024; 16:e76123. [PMID: 39840197 PMCID: PMC11745840 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/20/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2025] Open
Abstract
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have significantly transformed the management of patients undergoing colorectal surgery. This comprehensive review explores the key components and benefits of ERAS in colorectal procedures, focusing on preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative strategies aimed at improving patient outcomes. These strategies include preoperative patient education, multimodal analgesia, minimally invasive surgical techniques, and early mobilization. ERAS protocols reduce postoperative complications, shorten hospital stays, and enhance overall recovery, leading to better patient satisfaction and decreased healthcare costs. However, challenges such as patient adherence and managing high-risk patients remain critical areas for further research. Additionally, future research should focus on refining ERAS protocols, integrating novel technologies such as minimally invasive techniques, and evaluating long-term outcomes to further enhance the recovery process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Neda Ahmed Najem
- General Practice, Fakeeh College of Medical Sciences, Jeddah, SAU
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cataldo R, Bruni V, Migliorelli S, Gallo IF, Spagnolo G, Gibin G, Borgetti M, Strumia A, Ruggiero A, Pascarella G. Laparoscopic-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Combined with Port-Site Infiltration (PSI) for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in an ERABS Pathway: A Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Obes Surg 2024; 34:2475-2482. [PMID: 38764003 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07292-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2024] [Revised: 05/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) commonly experience moderate to severe postoperative pain. We conducted a randomized, prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study to evaluate the analgesic effect of laparoscopic-guided TAP (LG-TAP) block after LSG in a high-volume bariatric center, applying an enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery (ERABS) pathway. MATERIAL AND METHODS One hundred ten patients were randomly allocated to receive LG-TAP block with local anesthetic (LA) or saline solution (placebo), both combined with port-site infiltration with LA (LA-PSI). Primary outcome was pain score measured in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and at 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV), analgesic requirement, time to walking, time to flatus, length of hospital stay (LOS), and surgical complications. RESULTS No significant differences were observed between LG-TAP and placebo groups in postoperative analgesia, with a median (IQR) NRS of 2 (4.75-0) vs. 2 (5.25-0) in PACU, 5.5 (7-3) vs. 6 (7-4) at 6 h, 2 (6-0) vs. 3 (5.25-1.75) at 12 h, and 2 (3.75-0) vs. 1 (2-0) at 24 h; all p > 0.05. A significant difference was found in PONV in PACU (LG-TAP, 46%; placebo, 25%, p-value, 0.019) and at 6 h postoperatively (LG-TAP, 69%, placebo, 41%, p-value, 0.003). No differences were observed as regards other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that LG-TAP block is not related to more effective postoperative analgesia compared to placebo when LA-PSI is performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Cataldo
- Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bruni
- Unit of Bariatric Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Sabrina Migliorelli
- Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128, Rome, Italy.
| | - Ida Francesca Gallo
- Unit of Bariatric Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Spagnolo
- Unit of Bariatric Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Gibin
- Unit of Bariatric Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Miriam Borgetti
- Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Strumia
- Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ruggiero
- Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Pascarella
- Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ho JCE, Goel AR, Fung AH, Shaikh I, Iqbal MR. Robotic ambulatory colorectal resections: a systematic review. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:202. [PMID: 38713324 PMCID: PMC11076342 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01961-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
Colorectal surgery has progressed greatly via minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic and robotic. With the advent of ERAS protocols, patient recovery times have greatly shortened, allowing for same day discharges (SDD). Although SDD have been explored through laparoscopic colectomy reviews, no reviews surrounding robotic ambulatory colorectal resections (RACrR) exist to date. A systematic search was carried out across three databases and internet searches. Data were selected and extracted by two independent reviewers. Inclusion criteria included robotic colorectal resections with a length of hospital stay of less than one day or 24 h. 4 studies comprising 136 patients were retrieved. 56% of patients were female and were aged between 21 and 89 years. Main surgery indications were colorectal cancer and recurrent sigmoid diverticulitis (43% each). Most patients had low anterior resections (48%). Overall, there was a 4% complication rate postoperatively, with only 1 patient requiring readmission due to postoperative urinary retention (< 1%). Patient selection criteria involved ASA score cut-offs, nutritional status, and specific health conditions. Protocols employed shared similarities including ERAS education, transabdominal plane blocks, early removal of urinary catheters, an opioid-sparing regime, and encouraged early oral intake and ambulation prior to discharge. All 4 studies had various follow-up methods involving telemedicine, face-to-face consultations, and virtual ward teams. RACrRs is safe and feasible in a highly specific patient population; however, further high-quality studies with larger sample sizes are needed to draw more significant conclusions. Several limitations included small sample size and the potential of recall bias due to retrospective nature of 2 studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aryan Raj Goel
- UCL Medical School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, London, UK
| | - Adriel Heilong Fung
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
- University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Irshad Shaikh
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
- University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Xie J, De Souza E, Perez F, Suárez-Nieto MV, Wang E, Anderson TA. Perioperative Regional Anesthesia Pain Outcomes in Children: A Retrospective Study of 3160 Regional Anesthetics in Routine Practice. Clin J Pain 2024; 40:72-81. [PMID: 37942728 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000001172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Randomized controlled trials indicate regional anesthesia (RA) improves postoperative outcomes with reduced pain and opioid consumption. Therefore, we hypothesized children who received RA, regardless of technique, would have reduced pain/opioid use in routine practice. METHODS Using a retrospective cohort, we assessed the association of RA with perioperative outcomes in everyday practice at our academic pediatric hospital. Patients 18 years or below undergoing orthopedic, urologic, or general surgeries with and without RA from May 2014 to September 2021 were categorized as single shot, catheter based, or no block. Outcomes included intraoperative opioid exposure and dose, preincision anesthesia time, postanesthesia care unit (PACU) opioid exposure and dose, PACU antiemetic/antipruritic administration, PACU/inpatient pain scores, PACU/inpatient lengths of stay, and cumulative opioid exposure. Regression models estimated the adjusted association of RA with outcomes, controlling for multiple variables. RESULTS A total of 11,292 procedures with 3160 RAs were included. Compared with no-block group, single-shot and catheter-based blocks were associated with opioid-free intraoperative anesthesia and opioid-free PACU stays. Post-PACU (ie, while inpatient), single-shot blocks were not associated with improved pain scores or reduced opioid use. Catheter-based blocks were associated with reduced PACU and inpatient opioid use until 24 hours postop, no difference in opioid use from 24 to 36 hours, and a higher probability of use from 36 to 72 hours. RA was not associated with reduced cumulative opioid consumption. DISCUSSION Despite adjustment for confounders, the association of RA with pediatric pain/opioid use outcomes was mixed. Further investigation is necessary to maximize the benefits of RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Xie
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Micali M, Cucciolini G, Bertoni G, Gandini M, Lattuada M, Santori G, Introini C, Corradi F, Brusasco C. Analgesic Strategies for Urologic Videolaparoscopic or Robotic Surgery in the Context of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol: A Prospective Study Comparing Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block. J Clin Med 2024; 13:383. [PMID: 38256522 PMCID: PMC10816131 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Regional anesthesia in postoperative pain management has developed in recent years, especially with the advent of fascial plane blocks. This study aims to compare the ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus the ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) on postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic or robotic urologic surgery. This was a prospective observational study; 97 patients (ESPB-group) received bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB with 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% plus 0.5 mcg/kg of dexmedetomidine in each side at the level of T7-T9 and 93 patients (TAPB-group) received bilateral ultrasound-guided TAPB with 20 mL ropivacaine 0.375% or 0.25%. The primary outcome was the postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score, which was significantly lower in the ESPB group on postoperative days 0, 1, 2, and 3 (p < 0.001) and, consequently, the number of patients requiring postoperative supplemental analgesic rescue therapies was significantly lower (p < 0.001). Concerning the secondary outcomes, consumption of ropivacaine was significantly lower in the group (p < 0.001) and the total amount of analgesic rescue doses was significantly lower in the ESPB-group than the TAPB-group in postoperative days from 2 to 4 (1 vs. 3, p > 0.001). Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in the TAPB group and no block-related complications were observed. Our data indicate that ESPB provides postoperative pain control at least as good as TAPB plus morphine, with less local anesthetic needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Micali
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy; (M.G.); (M.L.); (C.B.)
| | - Giada Cucciolini
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (G.C.); (F.C.)
| | - Giulia Bertoni
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, NOA—Nuovo Ospedale Apuano, 54100 Massa, Italy;
| | - Michela Gandini
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy; (M.G.); (M.L.); (C.B.)
| | - Marco Lattuada
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy; (M.G.); (M.L.); (C.B.)
| | - Gregorio Santori
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16126 Genoa, Italy;
| | - Carlo Introini
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Urology Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 12128 Genoa, Italy;
| | - Francesco Corradi
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (G.C.); (F.C.)
| | - Claudia Brusasco
- Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy; (M.G.); (M.L.); (C.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liu J, Tian JM, Liu GZ, Sun JN, Gao PF, Zhang YQ, Yue XQ. Application of remimazolam transversus abdominis plane block in gastrointestinal tumor surgery. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 15:2101-2110. [PMID: 38173426 PMCID: PMC10758652 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i12.2101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) is a block of the abdominal afferent nerve fibers between the internal oblique muscle and the transverse abdominal muscle achieved with local anesthetics. It can effectively block the conduction of the anterior nerve of the abdominal wall and exert a good analgesic effect. However, the effect of combining the block with remimazolam on anesthesia in patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery is still unclear. AIM To examine the effects of combining TAPB with remimazolam on the stress response and postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal tumor surgery patients. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 102 individuals diagnosed with gastrointestinal malignancies who underwent laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia between April 2020 and June 2023. The patients were categorized into a control group (n = 51), receiving remimazolam for general anesthesia, and an observation group (n = 51), receiving TAPB combined with remimazolam for general anesthesia. A comparison was made between both groups in terms of hemodynamic parameters, stress markers, pain levels, recovery quality, analgesic effects, and adverse reactions during the perioperative period. RESULTS The observation group had significantly higher heart rates at time points 1 min after induction and upon leaving the operating room than the control group (P < 0.05). The mean arterial pressure at time point T1 in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Five minutes after extubation, the levels of the hormones adrenaline and noradrenaline in the observation group were considerably lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). At 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h following surgery, the visual analog scale scores of the observation group were considerably lower than those of the control group (P < 0.05). The observation group had shorter awakening and extubation times and lower Riker sedation-agitation scale scores than the control group (P < 0.05). The observation group exhibited considerably fewer effective pump presses, lower fentanyl dosages, and lower incidences of rescue analgesia within 24 h following surgery than the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION The application effect of TAPB combined with remimazolam general anesthesia in anesthesia of patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery is good, which is helpful to promote faster recovery after operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui 453100, Henan Province, China
| | - Jian-Min Tian
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui 453100, Henan Province, China
| | - Guo-Ze Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui 453100, Henan Province, China
| | - Jun-Na Sun
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui 453100, Henan Province, China
| | - Peng-Fei Gao
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui 453100, Henan Province, China
| | - Yong-Qiang Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui 453100, Henan Province, China
| | - Xiu-Qin Yue
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui 453100, Henan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sifaki F, Vogiatzaki T, Mantzoros I, Koraki E, Christidis P, Pramateftakis MG, Tsapara V, Bagntasarian S, Ioannidis O, Chloropoulou PP. The Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided, Continuous, Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block in Perioperative Pain Management of Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized, Controlled, Double Blind, Prospective Trial. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7465. [PMID: 38068517 PMCID: PMC10707092 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Open and laparoscopic colorectal surgeries, while essential in the management of various colorectal pathologies, are associated with significant postoperative pain. Effective perioperative pain management strategies remain an anesthesiologic challenge. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB), a novel peripheral nerve block, has gained attention for its potential in providing analgesia for a wide variety of surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of continuous, bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB in perioperative pain management of patients undergoing colectomy. This prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial included 40 adult patients scheduled for elective open or laparoscopic colectomy. Patients undergoing open colectomy as well as patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy were randomly allocated into two groups: the ESPB group (n = 20) and the control group (n = 20). All patients received preoperatively ultrasound-guided, bilateral ESPB with placement of catheters for continuous infusion. Patients in the ESPB group received 0.375% ropivacaine, while patients in the control group received sham blocks. All patients received standardized general anesthesia and multimodal postoperative analgesia. Pain scores, perioperative opioid consumption, and perioperative outcomes were assessed. Patients in the ESPB group required significantly less intraoperative (p < 0.001 for open colectomies, p = 0.002 for laparoscopic colectomies) and postoperative opioids (p < 0.001 for open colectomies, p = 0.002 for laparoscopic colectomies) and had higher quality of recovery scores on the third postoperative day (p = 0.002 for open and laparoscopic colectomies). Patients in the ESPB group did not exhibit lower postoperative pain scores compared to those in the control group (p > 0.05 at various time points), while patients in both groups reported comparable satisfaction scores with their perioperative pain management (p = 0.061 for open colectomies, and p = 0.078 in laparoscopic colectomies). No complications were reported. ESPB is a novel and effective strategy in reducing perioperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing colectomy. This technique, as part of a multimodal analgesic plan and enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, can be proven valuable in improving the comfort and satisfaction of patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freideriki Sifaki
- Department of Anesthesiology, “Papageorgiou” General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 56429 Thessaloniki, Greece; (F.S.); (E.K.)
| | - Theodosia Vogiatzaki
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, 68100 Alexandroupoli, Greece; (T.V.); (P.-P.C.)
| | - Ioannis Mantzoros
- 4th Department of Surgery, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, “Georgios Papanikolaou” General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece; (I.M.); (P.C.); (M.-G.P.)
| | - Eleni Koraki
- Department of Anesthesiology, “Papageorgiou” General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 56429 Thessaloniki, Greece; (F.S.); (E.K.)
| | - Panagiotis Christidis
- 4th Department of Surgery, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, “Georgios Papanikolaou” General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece; (I.M.); (P.C.); (M.-G.P.)
| | - Manousos-Georgios Pramateftakis
- 4th Department of Surgery, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, “Georgios Papanikolaou” General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece; (I.M.); (P.C.); (M.-G.P.)
| | - Vaia Tsapara
- Department of Anesthesiology, “Georgios Papanikolaou” General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece; (V.T.); (S.B.)
| | - Stella Bagntasarian
- Department of Anesthesiology, “Georgios Papanikolaou” General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece; (V.T.); (S.B.)
| | - Orestis Ioannidis
- 4th Department of Surgery, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, “Georgios Papanikolaou” General Hospital of Thessaloniki, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece; (I.M.); (P.C.); (M.-G.P.)
| | - Pelagia-Paraskevi Chloropoulou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, 68100 Alexandroupoli, Greece; (T.V.); (P.-P.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yang R, Wang J, Shi DW, Niu Y, Zhou XD, Liu Y, Xu GH. The Efficiency of Multipoint Rectus Sheath Block Based on Incision Location in Laparoscopic-Assisted Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:1578-1586. [PMID: 37379171 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery is an effective surgery to treat colorectal cancer. During the laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery, a midline incision and several trocar insertions are required during the surgery. OBJECTIVE To observe whether the rectus sheath block based on the locations of the surgical incision and trocars can significantly reduce the pain score on the first day after surgery. DESIGN This study was a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial approved by the Ethics Committee of First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (registration number: ChiCTR2100044684). SETTINGS All patients were recruited from 1 hospital. PATIENTS Forty-six patients aged 18 to 75 years undergoing elective laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery were successfully recruited, and 44 patients completed the trial. INTERVENTIONS Patients in the experimental group received rectus sheath block, with 0.4% ropivacaine 40 to 50 mL, whereas the control group received an equal volume of normal saline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was pain score on postoperative day 1. Secondary outcomes included patient-controlled analgesia use at 24 and 48 hours after surgery and pain score at 6, 12, and 48 hours after surgery. RESULTS Pain scores at rest and during activity at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery and patient-controlled analgesia consumption of patients on the first day after surgery were significantly lower in the experimental group than those in the control group (all p < 0.05). LIMITATIONS We did not separate pain into visceral and somatic pain because patients often had difficulty differentiating the source of pain. CONCLUSIONS Our research indicates that in the context of multimodal analgesia, the rectus sheath block according to the midline incision and the positions of the trocars can reduce the pain scores and consumption of analgesic drugs on the first day after surgery for patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery. LA EFICIENCIA DEL BLOQUEO DE LA VAINA DEL RECTO DE VARIOS PUNTOS SEGN LA UBICACIN DE LA INCISIN EN LA CIRUGA COLORRECTAL ASISTIDA POR LAPAROSCOPIA UN ENSAYO CLNICO ALEATORIZADO ANTECEDENTES:La cirugía colorrectal asistida por laparoscopia es una cirugía eficaz para tratar el cáncer colorrectal. Durante la cirugía colorrectal asistida por laparoscopia, se requiere una incisión en la línea media y varias inserciones de trócaresOBJETIVO:El propósito de nuestro estudio fue observar si el bloqueo de la vaina del recto basado en las ubicaciones de la incisión quirúrgica y los trocares puede reducir significativamente la puntuación del dolor en el primer día después de la cirugía.DISEÑO:Este estudio fue un ensayo controlado aleatorio prospectivo, doble ciego, aprobado por el Comité de Ética del Primer Hospital Afiliado de la Universidad Médica de Anhui (número de registro: ChiCTR2100044684).ESCENARIO:Todos los pacientes fueron reclutados en un hospital.PACIENTES:Cuarenta y seis pacientes de 18 a 75 años de edad que se sometieron a cirugía colorrectal electiva asistida por laparoscopía fueron reclutados con éxito y cuarenta y cuatro pacientes completaron el ensayo.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes del grupo experimental recibieron bloqueo de la vaina del recto con 40-50 ml de ropivacaína al 0.4%, mientras que el grupo de control recibió el mismo volumen de solución salina normal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue la puntuación del dolor en el día 1 postoperatorio. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron el uso de analgesia controlada por el paciente a las 24 y 48 horas después de la cirugía y la puntuación del dolor a las 6, 12, y 48 horas después de la cirugía.RESULTADOS:Las puntuaciones de dolor en reposo y durante la actividad a las 6, 12, 24, y 48 horas después de la cirugía, y el consumo de PCA de los pacientes el primer día después de la cirugía fueron significativamente más bajos en el grupo experimental que en el grupo control (todos p < 0.05).LIMITACIONES:No separamos el dolor en dolor visceral y somático porque los pacientes a menudo tenían dificultades para diferenciar la fuente del dolor.CONCLUSIONES:Nuestra investigación indica que, en el contexto de la analgesia multimodal, el bloqueo de la vaina del recto de acuerdo con la incisión de la línea media y las posiciones de los trócares pueden reducir los puntajes de dolor y el consumo de analgésicos en el primer día después de la cirugía para pacientes sometidos a cirugía colorrectal laparoscópica. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Yang
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - De-Wen Shi
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Yong Niu
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Xiao-Dan Zhou
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Guang-Hong Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
- Department of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sharma R, Damiano J, Al-Saidi I, Dizdarevic A. Chest Wall and Abdominal Blocks for Thoracic and Abdominal Surgeries: A Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2023; 27:587-600. [PMID: 37624474 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01158-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to provide an up-to-date description and overview of the rapidly growing literature pertaining to techniques and clinical applications of chest wall and abdominal fascial plane blocks in managing perioperative pain. RECENT FINDINGS Clinical evidence suggests that regional anesthesia blocks, including fascial plane blocks, such as pectoralis, serratus, erector spinae, transversus abdominis, and quadratus lumborum blocks, are effective in providing analgesia for various surgical procedures and have more desirable side effect profile when compared to traditional neuraxial techniques. They offer advantages such as reduced opioid consumption, improved pain control, and decreased opioid-related side effects. Further research is needed to establish optimal techniques and indications for these blocks. Presently, they are a vital instrument in a gamut of multimodal analgesia options, especially when there are contraindications to neuraxial or para-neuraxial procedures. Ultimately, clinical judgment and provider skill set determine which blocks-alone or in combination-should be offered to any patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richa Sharma
- Department of Anesthesiology, Weill-Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - James Damiano
- Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Ibrahim Al-Saidi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Anis Dizdarevic
- Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Deshler BJ, Rockenbach E, Patel T, Monahan BV, Poggio JL. Current update on multimodal analgesia and nonopiate surgical pain management. Curr Probl Surg 2023; 60:101332. [PMID: 37302814 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2023.101332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bailee J Deshler
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Emily Rockenbach
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Takshaka Patel
- Department of Surgery, General Surgery Resident Physician, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Brian V Monahan
- Department of Surgery, General Surgery Resident Physician, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Juan Lucas Poggio
- Division and System Chief, Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Professor of Surgery, Temple University Health System, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yang W, Yuan T, Cai Z, Ma Q, Liu X, Zhou H, Qiu S, Yang L. Laparoscopic versus ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain management in minimally invasive colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis protocol. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1080327. [PMID: 37284204 PMCID: PMC10240957 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1080327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) is now commonly administered for postoperative pain control and reduced opioid consumption in patients undergoing major colorectal surgeries, such as colorectal cancer, diverticular disease, and inflammatory bowel disease resection. However, there remain several controversies about the effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic TAPB compared to ultrasound-guided TAPB. Therefore, the aim of this study is to integrate both direct and indirect comparisons to identify a more effective and safer TAPB approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS Systematic electronic literature surveillance will be performed in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for eligible studies through July 31, 2023. The Cochrane Risk of Bias version 2 (RoB 2) and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools will be applied to scrutinize the methodological quality of the selected studies. The primary outcomes will include (1) opioid consumption at 24 hours postoperatively and (2) pain scores at 24 hours postoperatively both at rest and at coughing and movement according to the numerical rating scale (NRS). Additionally, the probability of TAPB-related adverse events, overall postoperative 30-day complications, postoperative 30-day ileus, postoperative 30-day surgical site infection, postoperative 7-day nausea and vomiting, and length of stay will be analyzed as secondary outcome measures. The findings will be assessed for robustness through subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses. Data analyses will be performed using RevMan 5.4.1 and Stata 17.0. P value of less than 0.05 will be defined as statistically significant. The certainty of evidence will be examined via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) working group approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Owing to the nature of the secondary analysis of existing data, no ethical approval will be required. Our meta-analysis will summarize all the available evidence for the effectiveness and safety of TAPB approaches for minimally invasive colorectal surgery. High-quality peer-reviewed publications and presentations at international conferences will facilitate disseminating the results of this study, which are expected to inform future clinical trials and help anesthesiologists and surgeons determine the optimal tailored clinical practice for perioperative pain management. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=281720, identifier (CRD42021281720).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenming Yang
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Tao Yuan
- Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhaolun Cai
- Gastric Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qin Ma
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xueting Liu
- Department of Medical Discipline Construction, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hang Zhou
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Siyuan Qiu
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Lie Yang
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zheng V, Wee IJY, Abdullah HR, Tan S, Tan EKW, Seow-En I. Same-day discharge (SDD) vs standard enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for major colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:110. [PMID: 37121985 PMCID: PMC10149457 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04408-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs are well-established, resulting in improved outcomes and shorter length of hospital stay (LOS). Same-day discharge (SDD), or "hyper-ERAS", is a natural progression of ERAS. This systematic review aims to compare the safety and efficacy of SDD against conventional ERAS in colorectal surgery. METHODS The protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (394793). A systematic search was performed in major databases to identify relevant articles, and a narrative systematic review was performed. Primary outcomes were readmission rates and length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were operative time and blood loss, postoperative pain, morbidity, nausea or vomiting, and patient satisfaction. Risks of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. RESULTS Thirteen studies were included, with five single-arm and eight comparative studies, of which one was a randomised controlled trial. This comprised a total of 38,854 patients (SDD: 1622; ERAS: 37,232). Of the 1622 patients on the SDD pathway, 1590 patients (98%) were successfully discharged within 24 h of surgery. While most studies had an overall low risk of bias, there was considerable variability in inclusion criteria, types of surgery or anaesthesia, and discharge criteria. SDD resulted in a significantly reduced postoperative LOS, without increasing risk of 30-day readmission. Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative morbidity rates were comparable between both groups. Operative duration was shorter in the SDD group. Patient-reported satisfaction was high in the SDD cohort. CONCLUSION SDD protocols appear to be safe and feasible in selected patients undergoing major colorectal operations. Randomised controlled trials are necessary to further substantiate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Zheng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - I J Y Wee
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - H R Abdullah
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - S Tan
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - E K W Tan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - I Seow-En
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore City, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Russo E, Latta M, Santonastaso DP, Bellantonio D, Cittadini A, Pietrantozzi D, Circelli A, Gamberini E, Martino C, Spiga M, Agnoletti V. Regional anesthesia in the intensive care unit: a single center's experience and a narrative literature review. DISCOVER HEALTH SYSTEMS 2023; 2:4. [PMID: 37520512 PMCID: PMC9870192 DOI: 10.1007/s44250-023-00018-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Russo
- Department of Surgery and Trauma, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Marina Latta
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Alma Mater Studiorum – Università Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Daniele Bellantonio
- Department of Surgery and Trauma, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Alessio Cittadini
- Department of Surgery and Trauma, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Dario Pietrantozzi
- Department of Surgery and Trauma, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Alessandro Circelli
- Department of Surgery and Trauma, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Emiliano Gamberini
- Department of Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Infermi Hospital, Rimini, Italy
| | - Costanza Martino
- Department of Anesthesiology and Acute Care, Umberto I Hospital of Lugo, Ausl Della Romagna, Lugo, Italy
| | - Martina Spiga
- Department of Surgery and Trauma, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- Department of Surgery and Trauma, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Geng ZY, Zhang Y, Bi H, Zhang D, Li Z, Jiang L, Song LL, Li XY. Addition of preoperative transversus abdominis plane block to multimodal analgesia in open gynecological surgery: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2023; 23:21. [PMID: 36635627 PMCID: PMC9835300 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-01981-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block can provide effective analgesia for abdominal surgery. However, it was questionable whether TAP had additional effect in the context of multimodal analgesia (MMA). Therefore, this study aimed to assess the additional analgesic effect of preoperative TAP block when added to MMA protocol in open gynecological surgery. METHODS In this prospective, randomized-controlled trial, 64 patients scheduled for open gynecological surgery were randomized to receive preoperative TAP block (Study group, n = 32) or placebo (Control group, n = 32) in addition to MMA protocol comprising dexamethasone, acetaminophen, flurbiprofen and celecoxib, and rescued morphine analgesia. The primary outcome was rescued morphine within 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, adverse effects, quality of recovery measured by 40-item quality of recovery questionnaire score (QoR-40) at 24 h, and quality of life measured with short-form health survey (SF - 36) on postoperative day (POD) 30. RESULTS The Study group had less rescued morphine than the control group within 24 h [5 (2-9) vs. 8.5 (5-12.8) mg, P = 0.013]. The Study group had lower pain scores at 1 h [3 (2-4) vs. 4 (3-5), P = 0.007], 2 h [3 (2-4) vs. 3.5 (3-5), P = 0.010] and 6 h [3 (2-3) vs. 3 (2.3-4), P = 0.028], lower incidence of nausea at 48 h (25.8% vs. 50%, P = 0.039), and higher satisfaction score [10 (10-10) vs. 10 (8-10), P = 0.041]. The SF-36 bodily pain score on POD 30 was higher in the Study group (59 ± 13 vs. 49 ± 16, P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative TAP block had additional analgesic effect for open gynecological surgery when used as part of multimodal analgesia. Rescued morphine within 24 h was significantly reduced and the SF-36 bodily pain dimension at 30 days after surgery was significantly improved. TRIAL REGISTRATION www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2000040343, on Nov 28 2020).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi Yu Geng
- grid.411472.50000 0004 1764 1621Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- grid.411472.50000 0004 1764 1621Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Bi
- grid.411472.50000 0004 1764 1621Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Dai Zhang
- grid.411472.50000 0004 1764 1621Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zheng Li
- grid.411472.50000 0004 1764 1621Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lu Jiang
- grid.411472.50000 0004 1764 1621Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Lin Song
- grid.411472.50000 0004 1764 1621Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xue Ying Li
- grid.411472.50000 0004 1764 1621Department of Biostatics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Irani JL, Hedrick TL, Miller TE, Lee L, Steinhagen E, Shogan BD, Goldberg JE, Feingold DL, Lightner AL, Paquette IM. Clinical practice guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:5-30. [PMID: 36515747 PMCID: PMC9839829 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09758-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) are dedicated to ensuring high-quality innovative patient care for surgical patients by advancing the science, prevention, and management of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and anus as well as minimally invasive surgery. The ASCRS and SAGES society members involved in the creation of these guidelines were chosen because they have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and rectal surgery and enhanced recovery. This consensus document was created to lead international efforts in defining quality care for conditions related to the colon, rectum, and anus and develop clinical practice guidelines based on the best available evidence. While not proscriptive, these guidelines provide information on which decisions can be made and do not dictate a specific form of treatment. These guidelines are intended for the use of all practitioners, healthcare workers, and patients who desire information about the management of the conditions addressed by the topics covered in these guidelines. These guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of methods of care reasonably directed toward obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure must be made by the physician in light of all the circumstances presented by the individual patient. This clinical practice guideline represents a collaborative effort between the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) and was approved by both societies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Irani
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Traci L Hedrick
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Timothy E Miller
- Duke University Medical Center Library, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lawrence Lee
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Emily Steinhagen
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Benjamin D Shogan
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Joel E Goldberg
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel L Feingold
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA
| | - Ian M Paquette
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Surgery (Colon and Rectal), 222 Piedmont #7000, Cincinnati, OH, 45219, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Irani JL, Hedrick TL, Miller TE, Lee L, Steinhagen E, Shogan BD, Goldberg JE, Feingold DL, Lightner AL, Paquette IM. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Colon and Rectal Surgery From the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:15-40. [PMID: 36515513 PMCID: PMC9746347 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L. Irani
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Traci L. Hedrick
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Timothy E. Miller
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Lawrence Lee
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Emily Steinhagen
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Benjamin D. Shogan
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Joel E. Goldberg
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel L. Feingold
- Department of Surgery, Section of Colorectal Surgery, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Amy L. Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland Clinic
| | - Ian M. Paquette
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Alsharari AF, Abuadas FH, Alnassrallah YS, Salihu D. Transversus Abdominis Plane Block as a Strategy for Effective Pain Management in Patients with Pain during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:6896. [PMID: 36498471 PMCID: PMC9735918 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11236896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), unlike laparotomy, is an invasive surgical procedure, and some patients report mild to moderate pain after surgery. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been shown to be an appropriate method for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. However, there have been few studies on the efficacy of TAP block after LC surgery, with unclear information on the optimal dose, long-term effects, and clinical significance, and the analgesic efficacy of various procedures, hence the need for this review. Five electronic databases (PubMed, Academic Search Premier, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library) were searched for eligible studies published from inception to the present. Post-mean and standard deviation values for pain assessed were extracted, and mean changes per group were calculated. Clinical significance was determined using the distribution-based approach. Four different local anesthetics (Bupivacaine, Ropivacaine, Lidocaine, and Levobupivacaine) were used at varying concentrations from 0.2% to 0.375%. Ten different drug solutions (i.e., esmolol, Dexamethasone, Magnesium Sulfate, Ketorolac, Oxycodone, Epinephrine, Sufentanil, Tropisetron, normal saline, and Dexmedetomidine) were used as adjuvants. The optimal dose of local anesthetics for LC could be 20 mL with 0.4 mL/kg for port infiltration. Various TAP procedures such as ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (US-TAP) block and other strategies have been shown to be used for pain management in LC; however, TAP blockade procedures were reported to be the most effective method for analgesia compared with general anesthesia and port infiltration. Instead of 0.25% Bupivacaine, 1% Pethidine could be used for the TAP block procedures. Multimodal analgesia could be another strategy for pain management. Analgesia with TAP blockade decreases opioid consumption significantly and provides effective analgesia. Further studies should identify the long-term effects of different TAP block procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Dauda Salihu
- College of Nursing, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Oodit R, Biccard BM, Panieri E, Alvarez AO, Sioson MRS, Maswime S, Thomas V, Kluyts HL, Peden CJ, de Boer HD, Brindle M, Francis NK, Nelson G, Gustafsson UO, Ljungqvist O. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Abdominal and Pelvic Surgery at Primary and Secondary Hospitals in Low-Middle-Income Countries (LMIC's): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendation. World J Surg 2022; 46:1826-1843. [PMID: 35641574 PMCID: PMC9154207 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06587-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is the first Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guideline for primary and secondary hospitals in low-middle-income countries (LMIC's) for elective abdominal and gynecologic care. METHODS The ERAS LMIC Guidelines group was established by the ERAS® Society in collaboration with different representatives of perioperative care from LMIC's. The group consisted of seven members from the ERAS® Society and eight members from LMIC's. An updated systematic literature search and evaluation of evidence from previous ERAS® guidelines was performed by the leading authors of the Colorectal (2018) and Gynecologic (2019) surgery guidelines (Gustafsson et al in World J Surg 43:6592-695, Nelson et al in Int J Gynecol Cancer 29(4):651-668). Meta-analyses randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies from both HIC's and LMIC's were considered for each perioperative item. The members in the LMIC group then applied the current evidence and adapted the recommendations for each intervention as well as identifying possible new items relevant to LMIC's. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system (GRADE) methodology was used to determine the quality of the published evidence. The strength of the recommendations was based on importance of the problem, quality of evidence, balance between desirable and undesirable effects, acceptability to key stakeholders, cost of implementation and specifically the feasibility of implementing in LMIC's and determined through discussions and consensus. RESULTS In addition to previously described ERAS® Society interventions, the following items were included, revised or discussed: the Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC), preoperative routine human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing in countries with a high prevalence of HIV/AIDS (CD4 and viral load for those patients that are HIV positive), delirium screening and prevention, COVID 19 screening, VTE prophylaxis, immuno-nutrition, prehabilitation, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and a standardized postoperative monitoring guideline. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines are seen as a starting point to address the urgent need to improve perioperative care and to effect data-driven, evidence-based care in LMIC's.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravi Oodit
- Division of Global Surgery, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape South Africa
| | - Bruce M. Biccard
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape South Africa
| | - Eugenio Panieri
- Division of General Surgery, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape South Africa
| | - Adrian O. Alvarez
- Anesthesia Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Teniente General Juan Domingo Peron, 4190, C1199ABB Beunos Aires, Argentina
| | - Marianna R. S. Sioson
- Head Section of Medical Nutrition, Department of Medicine and ERAS Team, The Medical City, Ortigas Avenue, Manila, Metro Manila Philippines
| | - Salome Maswime
- Division of Global Surgery, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, Western Cape South Africa
| | - Viju Thomas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tygerberg Hospital and University of Stellenbosch, Francie Van Zyl Drive, Parow, Cape Town, Western Cape South Africa
| | - Hyla-Louise Kluyts
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Medunsa, Molotlegi Street, P.O. Box 60, Ga-Rankuwa, Pretoria, 0204 Gauteng South Africa
| | - Carol J. Peden
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1975 Zonal Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Hans D. de Boer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, Martini General Hospital Groningen, Van Swietenplein 1, 9728 NT Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Mary Brindle
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, London, Canada
- Alberta Children’s Hospital, Calgary, Canada
- Safe Systems, Ariadne Labs, Stockholm, USA
- EQuIS Research Platform, Orebro, Canada
| | - Nader K. Francis
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science- UCL, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| | - Gregg Nelson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Calgary, 1331 29 St NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2 Canada
| | - Ulf O. Gustafsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Entrevägen 2, 19257 Stockholm, Danderyd Sweden
| | - Olle Ljungqvist
- School of Medical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Örebro University, 701 85 Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Copperthwaite A, Sahebally SM, Raza ZM, Devane L, McCawley N, Kearney D, Burke J, McNamara D. A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ir J Med Sci 2022; 192:795-803. [PMID: 35499808 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-022-03017-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced recovery programmes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) employ combined approaches to achieve postoperative analgesia. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a locoregional anaesthetic technique that may reduce postoperative pain. AIMS To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic- versus ultrasound-guided TAP block in LCS. METHODS Databases were searched for relevant articles from inception until March 2022. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared laparoscopic (LTB) versus ultrasound-guided (UTB) TAP blocks in LCS were included. The primary outcome was narcotic consumption at 24 h postoperatively, whilst secondary outcomes included pain scores at 24 h postoperatively, operative time, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and complication rates. Random effects models were used to calculate pooled effect size estimates. RESULTS Three RCTs were included capturing 219 patients. Studies were clinically heterogenous. On random effects analysis, LTB was associated with significantly lower narcotic consumption (SMD - 0.30 mg, 95% CI = - 0.57 to - 0.03, p = 0.03) and pain scores (SMD - 0.29, 95% CI = - 0.56 to - 0.03, p = 0.03) at 24 h. However, there were no differences in operative time (SMD - 0.09 min, 95% CI = - 0.40 to 0.22, p = 0.56), PONV (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.36 to 2.65, p = 0.96) or complication (OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 0.64 to 2.64, p = 0.47) rates. CONCLUSIONS LTB is associated with significantly less narcotic usage and pain at 24 h postoperatively but similar PONV, operative time and complication rates, compared to UTB. However, the data were inconsistent, and our findings require further investigation. LTB obviates the need for ultrasound devices whilst also decreasing procedure logistical complexity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Copperthwaite
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, 9, Dublin, Ireland.
- Royal College of Surgeons, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland.
- Department of Otolaryngology, Sligo University Hospital, Sligo, Ireland.
| | - Shaheel Mohammad Sahebally
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, 9, Dublin, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Zeeshan Muhammad Raza
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, 9, Dublin, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Liam Devane
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, 9, Dublin, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Niamh McCawley
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, 9, Dublin, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland
| | - David Kearney
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, 9, Dublin, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John Burke
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, 9, Dublin, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Deborah McNamara
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, 9, Dublin, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Erten O, Isiktas G, Avci SN, Berber E. The efficacy of laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block on reducing postoperative narcotic usage in patients undergoing minimally invasive adrenalectomy. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:7204-7209. [PMID: 35112141 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09076-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-operative pain relief after abdominal operations is critical for patient satisfaction and rapid recovery. Narcotics have been a traditional part of postoperative analgesia, with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block introduced recently. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of laparoscopic TAP block on postoperative pain control in patients undergoing minimally invasive adrenalectomy. METHODS This was an institutional review board-approved retrospective study. Parameters related to postoperative pain control were compared between patients who underwent robotic transabdominal lateral adrenalectomy with (after December 2018) or without laparoscopic TAP block (control group) (before December 2018) by one surgeon. Statistics were performed using Mann Whitney U and Chi-square tests. RESULTS There were 86 patients in the TAP and 83 patients in the control group. Groups were similar regarding demographic and clinical parameters. Despite the availability of intravenous acetaminophen to a higher percentage of patients in the control (31.3%) versus the TAP group (8.1%), 0-24 h lowest postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the TAP group (P < 0.0001). In TAP versus control group, percentage of patients requiring narcotics and amount of narcotics used was lower (P = 0.04 vs P = 0.0004, respectively). Mainly due to less pain-related over-stay, percentage of patients requiring more than a day of hospital stay was less in the TAP (12%) versus control group (18%) (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION To our knowledge, the utility of TAP block in patients undergoing minimally invasive adrenalectomy has not been reported in the past. This study shows that there may be benefits of laparoscopic TAP block in reducing post-operative narcotic usage while improving pain control in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ozgun Erten
- Department of Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Gizem Isiktas
- Department of Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Seyma N Avci
- Department of Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Eren Berber
- Department of Endocrine Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. .,Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Parrish RH, Findley R, Elias KM, Kramer B, Johnson EG, Gramlich L, Nelson GS. Pharmacotherapeutic prophylaxis and post-operative outcomes within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) program: A randomized retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 73:103178. [PMID: 35003725 PMCID: PMC8717452 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacotherapy prophylaxis embedded in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) protocols is largely unknown because data related to agent choice, dosing, timing, and duration of treatment currently are not collected in the ERAS Interactive Audit System (EIAS®). This exploratory retrospective randomized cohort study characterized pharmacologic regimens pertaining to prophylaxis of surgical site infections (SSI), venous thromboembolism (VTE), and post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). MATERIALS AND METHODS The records of 250 randomly-selected adult patients that underwent elective colorectal (CR) and gynecologic/oncology procedures (GO) at an ERAS® site in North America were abstracted using REDCap. In addition to descriptive statistics, bivariate associations between categorical variables were compared. RESULTS Rates of SSI, VTE, & PONV were 3.3%, 1.1%, and 53.6%, respectively. Mean length of stay (LOS) for CR was 6.9 days and for GO, 3.5 days (p < 0.001). The most common antibiotic prophylaxis was one-time combination cefazolin 2 g and metronidazole 500 mg between 16 and 30 min preoperatively after chlorhexidine skin preparation. The most frequent VTE prophylaxis was tinzaparin 4500 units SC daily continued for at least 7 days after hospital discharge in oncology patients. PONV was related to longer LOS in both groups. Total morphine milligram equivalents (MME) was positively related to PONV and LOS in both CR & GO groups. CONCLUSION Guideline-consistent pharmacologic prophylaxis for SSI and VTE for both CR and GO patients was associated with low complication, LOS, and readmission rates. LOS in both groups was highly influenced by total MME, incidence of PONV and multi-modal anesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard H. Parrish
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Mercer University School of Medicine, 633 First Street, Columbus, GA, 31901, USA
- Corresponding author.;
| | - Rachelle Findley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, 1331 29 St NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Kevin M. Elias
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Brian Kramer
- Department of Pharmacy Services, 111 South Grant Avenue, Grant Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 43215, USA
| | - Eric G. Johnson
- Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Kentucky, 1000 S. Limestone, First Floor, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA
| | - Leah Gramlich
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Walter C Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, 8440 112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R7, Canada
| | - Gregg S. Nelson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, 1331 29 St NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bracale U, Di Nuzzo MM, Bracale UM, Del Guercio L, Panagrosso M, Serra R, Terracciano RM, De Werra C, Corcione F, Peltrini R, Sodo M. Sequential Minimally Invasive Treatment of Concomitant Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Center Experience. Ann Vasc Surg 2022; 78:226-232. [PMID: 34492315 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Revised: 07/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The surgical management of concomitant occurrence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and colorectal cancer (CRC) is still controversial. Conversely, benefits from a minimally invasive approach are well known concerning the treatment of both AAA and CRC. The aim of this study is to assess safety and feasibility of a sequential 2-staged minimally invasive during the same recovery by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) technique and laparoscopic colorectal resection. METHODS From January 2008 to December 2020, all patients with concomitant AAA and CRC were consecutively treated by EVAR and laparoscopic colorectal resection. Perioperative data were retrospectively collected in order to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes following the sequential 2-staged procedures. RESULTS A total of 24 patients were included. The localization of the aneurysm was infrarenal abdominal aortic in 23 cases and in one case of common iliac artery. EVAR procedure has always been performed first. In 18 patients, a percutaneous access has been used while in 6 patients a surgical access has been adopted. Twelve patients had cancer in the left colon, 9 in the right colon, and 3 patients had rectal cancer. No conversions or intraoperative complications had occurred during laparoscopic surgery. The major complications rate after EVAR and CRC surgery was 8.3% and 12.5%, respectively. The mean interval between EVAR and CRC treatment was 7.8 ± 1 and the mean length of stay was 15.4 ± 3.6. No deaths occurred during hospitalization and between the procedures. Overall mortality was 20.8% with a mean follow-up of 39.41 ± 19.2 months. CONCLUSION Elective sequential 2-staged minimally invasive treatment is a safe and feasible approach with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates and it should be adopted in current clinical practice to manage concomitant AAA and CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Bracale
- Department of Public Health, Minimally Invasive General and Oncological Surgery Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Michela Di Nuzzo
- Department of Public Health, Minimally Invasive General and Oncological Surgery Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Umberto Marcello Bracale
- Department of Public Health, Vascular Surgery Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Del Guercio
- Department of Public Health, Vascular Surgery Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Panagrosso
- Department of Public Health, Vascular Surgery Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Raffaele Serra
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Rosa Maria Terracciano
- Department of Public Health, Minimally Invasive General and Oncological Surgery Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Carlo De Werra
- Department of Public Health, Minimally Invasive General and Oncological Surgery Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Corcione
- Department of Public Health, Minimally Invasive General and Oncological Surgery Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Peltrini
- Department of Public Health, Minimally Invasive General and Oncological Surgery Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
| | - Maurizio Sodo
- Department of Public Health, Minimally Invasive General and Oncological Surgery Unit, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Daghmouri MA, Chaouch MA, Oueslati M, Rebai L, Oweira H. Regional techniques for pain management following laparoscopic elective colonic resection: A systematic review. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2021; 72:103124. [PMID: 34925820 PMCID: PMC8648937 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Pain management is an integral part of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) following laparoscopic colonic resection. A variety of regional and neuraxial techniques were proposed, but their efficacy is still controversial. This systematic review evaluates published evidence on analgesic techniques and their impact on postoperative analgesia and recovery for laparoscopic colonic surgery patients. Methods We conducted bibliographic research on May 10, 2021, through PubMed, Cochrane database, and Google scholar. We retained meta-analysis and randomized clinical trials. We graded the strength of clinical data and subsequent recommendations according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Results Twelve studies were included. Thoracic epidural analgesia improved postoperative analgesia and bowel function following laparoscopic colectomy. However, it lengthens the hospital stay. Transversus abdominis plane block was as effective as thoracic epidural analgesia concerning pain control but with better postoperative recovery and lower length of hospital stay. Moreover, Lidocaine intravenous infusion improved postoperative pain management and recovery; Quadratus lumborum block provided similar postoperative analgesia and recovery. Finally, wound infiltration reduced postoperative pain without improving recovery of bowel function, and it could be proposed as an alternative to thoracic epidural analgesia. Conclusions Several analgesic techniques have been investigated. We found that abdominal wall blocks were as effective as thoracic epidural analgesia for pain management but with lower hospital stay and better recovery. We registered this review on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021279228).
First systematic review assessing the efficacy of analgesic techniques following laparoscopic elective colonic resection. Only colonic resection was evaluated contrary to other studies, including rectal surgery. High-quality studies (randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses) were assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mohamed Ali Chaouch
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, University of Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Maroua Oueslati
- Department of Anesthesia, Trauma Center of Ben Arrous, University of Manar, Tunisia
| | - Lotfi Rebai
- Department of Anesthesia, Trauma Center of Ben Arrous, University of Manar, Tunisia
| | - Hani Oweira
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, S, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Honaker MD, Hawes CC, Vinter DA, Montgomery A, Parker JC, Smith BE. Continuous transversus abdominis plane blocks in patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery: a randomized pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:2511-2518. [PMID: 34240275 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03978-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks are used in an attempt to decrease narcotic use and its subsequent consequences. The primary goal of this study was to see if TAP blocks decreased narcotic use in patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery. METHODS A randomized pilot study was conducted. The amount of narcotic used examined in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) was collected for the first 4 post-operative days (PODs). Demographic data, length of stay (LOS), readmission rate, and 90-day mortality was also examined. Statistical analysis of the data was performed with a p < 0.05 determined to be significant. RESULTS Eighty-eight patients were included. Forty-seven were randomized to the TAP group and 41 to the no TAP group. There was no difference in age, race, gender, indication for operation, or Charlson Comorbidity Index (p > 0.05). The median MME for each POD was similar for POD 1 (22.5 vs 37.5; p = 0.054), POD 3 (15 vs 22.5; p = 0.48), and POD 4 (22.5 vs 10.5; p = 0.42) on bivariate analysis. On POD 2, the TAP group had significantly less narcotic intake than the no TAP group (17.5 vs 30; p = 0.047). However, on multivariate analysis when controlling for other variables, there was no statistical difference between the groups. Median LOS was 3 days for both groups. Readmissions, post-operative complications, and mortality were also similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION Our findings indicate that continuous TAP blocks do not decrease the amount of MME used during the first 4 post-operative days compared to patient receiving traditional pain control measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Drew Honaker
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Colorectal Surgery, Navicent Health, 800 1St Suite 240, Macon, GA, 31201, USA.
| | - Casey Chinn Hawes
- Department of Surgery, Mercer University School of Medicine, 777 Hemlock Street, Macon, GA, 31201, USA
| | - Dana Alina Vinter
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mercer University School of Medicine, 433 Cherry Street, Macon, GA, 31201, USA
| | - Anne Montgomery
- Georgia Rural Health Innovation Center, Mercer University School of Medicine, 1501 Mercer University Dr, Macon, GA, 31207, USA
| | - James Cole Parker
- Department of Surgery, Mercer University School of Medicine, 777 Hemlock Street, Macon, GA, 31201, USA
| | - Betsy Epps Smith
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mercer University School of Medicine, 433 Cherry Street, Macon, GA, 31201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Peltrini R, Podda M, Castiglioni S, Di Nuzzo MM, D'Ambra M, Lionetti R, Sodo M, Luglio G, Mucilli F, Di Saverio S, Bracale U, Corcione F. Intraoperative use of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in rectal cancer surgery: The state of the art. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:6374-6386. [PMID: 34720528 PMCID: PMC8517789 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i38.6374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging is widely used in abdominal surgery. The implementation of minimally invasive rectal surgery using new methods like robotics or a transanal approach required improvement of optical systems. In that setting, ICG fluorescence optimizes intraoperative vision of anatomical structures by improving blood and lymphatic flow. The purpose of this review was to summarize all potential applications of this upcoming technology in rectal cancer surgery. Each type of use has been separately addressed and the evidence was investigated. During rectal resection, ICG fluorescence angiography is mainly used to evaluate the perfusion of the colonic stump in order to reduce the risk of anastomotic leaks. In addition, ICG fluorescence imaging allows easy visualization of organs such as the ureter or urethra to protect them from injury. This intraoperative technology is a valuable tool for conducting lymph node dissection along the iliac lymphatic chain or to better identifying the rectal dissection planes when a transanal approach is performed. This is an overview of the applications of ICG fluorescence imaging in current surgical practice and a synthesis of the results obtained from the literature. Although further studies are need to investigate the real clinical benefits, these findings may enhance use of ICG fluorescence in current clinical practice and stimulate future research on new applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Peltrini
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli 80131, Italy
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Cagliari University Hospital "Duilio Casula", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Cagliari, Cagliari 09100, Italy
| | - Simone Castiglioni
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University G. D’Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, Pescara 65100, Italy
| | | | - Michele D'Ambra
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli 80131, Italy
| | - Ruggero Lionetti
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli 80131, Italy
| | - Maurizio Sodo
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli 80131, Italy
| | - Gaetano Luglio
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli 80131, Italy
| | - Felice Mucilli
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University G. D’Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, Pescara 65100, Italy
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Department of General Surgery, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese 21100, Italy
| | - Umberto Bracale
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli 80131, Italy
| | - Francesco Corcione
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli 80131, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Verla MA, Iqbal A. Multimodal analgesia: Opioid-sparing strategies for pain management. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scrs.2021.100830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
32
|
Harfoush M, Wilson D, Kim SY, Claude A. Open approach to the ventral transversus abdominis plane in the dog: evaluation and injectate dispersion in cadavers. Vet Anaesth Analg 2021; 48:767-774. [PMID: 34281772 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaa.2021.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate a direct intra-abdominal approach to injection of the ventral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) and compare the dispersion of two volumes of injectate. STUDY DESIGN Prospective anatomic and feasibility study. ANIMALS A total of 10 canine cadavers weighing 9 ± 4 kg. METHODS A ventral incision was made extending through the linea alba, from the umbilicus and extending 5 cm caudally. A single injection of an isovolumic mixture of iopamidol and new methylene blue was performed with a hypodermic needle placed within the TAP of each hemiabdomen, alternating between 0.5 mL kg-1 in low-volume group (LV) and 1 mL kg-1 in high-volume group (HV). Surgical staples marked the incision. Computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction of the tomographic images evaluated the dimensions, cranial and caudal spread beyond the incision and the total area of the injectate. Dissection determined the extent of nerve staining within the TAP adjacent to the abdominal incision. Wilcoxon signed rank (stain) or paired t test was used to compare variables between groups. Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation or median (range). RESULTS Injectate spread was within the ventral TAP. Length of spread was 2.5 ± 1.6 cm greater in group HV than in group LV. There was a strong positive correlation between the surface area (p = 0.02, r = 0.71) and cranial-caudal spread of injectate (p = 0.041, r = 0.65) with volume. All but two LV injections were associated with staining of all nerves adjacent to the incision. Additional nerves caudal to the incision were stained in group HV (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS This approach to the TAP was easily performed, with volume of injectate positively influencing distribution. CLINICAL RELEVANCE This technique is easily applied and future prospective studies are warranted to determine its analgesic efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Harfoush
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
| | - Deborah Wilson
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Sun Young Kim
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Andrew Claude
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Joshi TV, Bruce SF, Grim R, Buchanan T, Chatterjee-Paer S, Burton ER, Sorosky JI, Shahin MS, Edelson MI. Implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2021; 36:100771. [PMID: 34036136 PMCID: PMC8134956 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Enhanced recovery in gynecologic oncology decreased narcotic usage. Shorter length of hospital stay was also observed in the ERAS cohort. ERAS produced early return of bowel function. The ERAS cohort received less perioperative blood transfusions. A compliance analysis is integral to successful implementation of ERAS. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based approach that aims to reduce narcotic use and maintain anabolic balance to enable full functional recovery. Our primary aim was to determine the effect of ERAS on narcotic usage among patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy by gynecologic oncologists. We characterized its effect on length of stay, intraoperative blood transfusions, bowel function, 30-day readmissions, and postoperative complications. A retrospective cohort study was performed at Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health in gynecologic oncology. Women who underwent an exploratory laparotomy from 2011 to 2016 for both benign and malignant etiologies were included before and after implementation of our ERAS protocol. Patients who underwent a bowel resection were excluded. A total of 724 patients were included: 360 in the non-ERAS and 364 in the ERAS cohort. An overall reduction in narcotic usage, measured as oral morphine milliequivalents (MMEs) was observed in the ERAS relative to the non-ERAS group, during the entire hospital stay (MME 34 versus 68, p < 0.001 and within 72 h postoperatively (MME 34 versus 60, p < 0.005). A shorter length of stay and earlier return of bowel function were also observed in the ERAS group. No differences in 30-day readmissions (p = 0.967) or postoperative complications (p = 0.328) were observed. This study demonstrated the benefits of ERAS in Gynecologic Oncology. A significant reduction of postoperative narcotic use, earlier return of bowel function and a shorter postoperative hospital stay was seen in the ERAS compared to traditional perioperative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanvi V Joshi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, 1200 Old York Road, Price 109, Abington, PA 19001, United States
| | - Shaina F Bruce
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, 1200 Old York Road, Price 109, Abington, PA 19001, United States
| | - Rod Grim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, 1200 Old York Road, Price 109, Abington, PA 19001, United States
| | - Tommy Buchanan
- Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, 3941 Commerce Avenue, Willow Grove, PA 19090, United States
| | - Sudeshna Chatterjee-Paer
- Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, 3941 Commerce Avenue, Willow Grove, PA 19090, United States
| | - Elizabeth R Burton
- Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, 3941 Commerce Avenue, Willow Grove, PA 19090, United States
| | - Joel I Sorosky
- Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, 3941 Commerce Avenue, Willow Grove, PA 19090, United States
| | - Mark S Shahin
- Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, 3941 Commerce Avenue, Willow Grove, PA 19090, United States
| | - Mitchell I Edelson
- Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Abington Hospital-Jefferson Health, 3941 Commerce Avenue, Willow Grove, PA 19090, United States
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bowker B, Calabrese RO, Barber E. Postoperative Ileus. PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT CLINICS 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpha.2020.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
35
|
Hamid HKS, Marc-Hernández A, Saber AA. Transversus abdominis plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 406:273-282. [PMID: 32974803 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01995-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block compared with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in abdominal surgery has been controversial. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess outcomes of TAP block and TEA in a procedure-specific manner in colorectal surgery. METHODS A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases was conducted through July 10, 2020, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TAP block with TEA in colorectal surgery. Primary outcomes were pain scores at rest and movement at 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores at 0-2 and 48 h, opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), functional recovery, hospital stay, and adverse events. RESULTS Six RCTs with 568 patients were included. Methodological quality of these RCTs ranged from moderate to high. TAP block provided comparable pain control, lower 24 h and total opioid consumption, shorter time to ambulation and urinary catheter time, and lower incidence of sensory disturbance and postoperative hypotension compared with TEA. Meanwhile, the 48-h opioid consumption, PONV incidence, and hospital stay were similar between groups. When laparoscopic surgery was the only surgical approach employed, TAP block provided additional benefits of shorter time to first flatus and lower incidence of PONV compared with TEA. CONCLUSIONS Perhaps more germane to minimally invasive procedures, TAP block is equivalent to TEA in terms of postoperative pain control and provides better functional recovery with lower incidence of adverse events in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hytham K S Hamid
- Department of Surgery, Soba University Hospital, Khartoum, Sudan.
| | | | - Alan A Saber
- Department of Surgery, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|