Since its introduction in 1977, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has widely been accepted treatment for unresectable intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Conventional TACE (c-TACE) uses an emulsion of chemotherapeutic agent and ethiodized oil with subsequent embolization of the feeding artery using gelatin sponge. Drug eluting beads (DEB) were introduced in clinical practice in the 2000s and have since been used as an alternative to c-TACE with better outcomes, especially in larger tumors. Considering the widespread use of TACE in HCC, it is important to revisit the current knowledge and the advances that have developed for better safety and efficacy. This article aims to emphasize on the current knowledge and importance of TACE, touch upon the technical aspects including post-TACE care, response assessment, and discontinuation strategies and highlight the recent advances in the technology, catheters, and embolization particles. Thus, despite a rapid change in treatment algorithms and availability of newer drugs for HCC, TACE will remain an integral part of HCC treatment alone or in combination with other therapies.

This meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors (T-T-P) and dual therapy with TKIs combined with TACE (T-T) for the treatment of advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

Literature related to the efficacy of TKIs combined with TACE plus PD-1 inhibitors in uHCC was searched using the Embase, PubMed, and Cocrane libraries. TSA was used to reduce false positive results due to random error.

Seventeen articles were included in this meta-analysis, including 2,561 patients. In the T-T-P group, OS [HR 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.52; p = 0.000], PFS [HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.38 - 0.48; p = 0.000], were significantly prolonged compared to those in the T-T group; ORR (RR 1.59 [95% CI 1.39-1.81]; p = 0.000) and DCR (RR 1.26 [95% CI 1.15-1.37]; p = 0.000) were significantly higher. TSA analysis showed early results without further testing. Prognostic factor analysis demonstrated that portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) and extrahepatic metastasis were common independent risk factors for OS and PFS. Regarding grade 3/4 adverse events results showed no statistically significant differences in any of them.

Compared with T-T treatment group, the T-T-P treatment group exhibited a notable improvement in OS and PFS, particularly in cases of PVTT and extrahepatic metastasis. Furthermore, it can markedly enhance the ORR and DCR in patients with uHCC.

This study aimed to evaluate the image quality and visualization of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on arterial phase computed tomography (CT) using the contrast enhancement (CE)-boost technique.

This retrospective study included 527 consecutive patients who underwent dynamic liver CT between June 2021 and February 2022. Quantitative and qualitative image analyses were performed on 486 patients after excluding 41 patients. HCC conspicuity was evaluated in 40 of the 486 patients with at least one HCC in the liver. Iodinated images obtained by subtracting nonenhanced images from arterial phase images were combined to generate CE-boost images. For quantitative image analysis, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured for the liver, pancreas, muscles, and aorta. For qualitative analysis, the overall image quality and noise were graded using a 3-point scale. Artifact, sharpness, and HCC lesion conspicuity were assessed using a 5-point scale. The paired-sample t test was used to compare quantitative measures, whereas the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare qualitative measures.

The mean SNR and CNR of the aorta, liver, pancreas, and muscle were significantly higher, and the image noise was significantly lower in the CE-boost images than in the conventional images ( P  < 0.001). The mean CNR of HCC was also significantly higher in the CE-boost images than in the conventional images ( P  < 0.001). In the qualitative analysis, CE-boost images showed higher scores for HCC lesion conspicuity than conventional images ( P  < 0.001).

The overall image quality and visibility of HCC were improved using the CE-boost technique.

Introduction: Curative treatment of HCC can be achieved by liver transplantation. In the framework of transplantation, add-on transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) can be performed as bridging therapy for local tumor control. The association between TACE and an increased incidence of hepatic arterial complications after transplantation has been investigated in multiple research items; however, the exact association remains unclear. The aim of this report was to explore the role of pre-transplantation TACE and pre-existing vascular celiac pathologies on the occurrence of postoperative hepatic arterial complications. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included all patients who underwent liver transplantation between 2008 and 2020. Arterial complication was defined as any postoperative occlusion, stenosis >50%, dissection or aneurysm on cross-sectional imaging. Results: This study encompasses 109 patients after transplantation, of which 80 underwent TACE prior to transplantation. The overall incidence of postoperative arterial complications did not differ between the groups (TACE 8/80 vs. control 6/29, p = 0.19). Further analysis showed no significant differences in the occurrence of specific complications (Occlusion: TACE 9/80 vs. control 3/29, p = 0.56; Stenosis: TACE 4/80 vs. control 5/29, p = 0.05; Dissection: TACE 1/80 vs. control 1/29; p = 0.46). Furthermore, linear regression analysis for preoperative TACE therapy, anatomic variants and pre-existing pathologies of the hepatic vasculature showed no association with postoperative arterial complications. Conclusions: Preoperative TACE therapy showed no influence on the incidence of post-transplant arterial complications in patients after liver transplantation. Furthermore, preoperative TACE therapy as well as anatomic variants and pre-existing arterial pathologies of the celiac axis could not be identified as risk factors for complications at the arterial anastomotic site after transplantation.

Drug-eluting microsphere transarterial chemoembolization (DEM-TACE) reduces systemic exposure to chemotherapeutic drugs compared with conventional TACE but permanently occludes the embolized vessels, potentially obviating the possibility of re-treatment with TACE. Temporary embolization by resorbable BioPearl™ microspheres might facilitate subsequent re-treatments. We herein describe the trial protocol of BIOPEARL-ONE, a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, post-market clinical follow-up study. The primary objectives are technical success and safety following the use. DEM-TACE with doxorubicin-loaded BioPearl™ for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The secondary objectives are tumor response, duration of response, progression-free survival, and survival rate at 18 months. Fifty patients with HCC nodules smaller than 5 cm and within the up-to-7 criteria will be enrolled.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05911633.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a proven and widely accepted treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma and it is recommended as first-line non-curative therapy for BCLC B/intermediate HCC (preserved liver function, multifocal, no cancer-related symptoms) in patients without vascular involvement. Different types of TACE are available nowadays, including TAE, c-TACE, DEB-TACE, and DSM-TACE, but at present there is insufficient evidence to recommend one TACE technique over another and the choice is left to the operator. This review then aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current literature on indications, types of procedures, safety, and efficacy of different TACE treatments.

Despite increasing interest, prospective data on the use of degradable starch microsphere-transarterial chemoembolization (DSM-TACE) in the management of patients with unresectable HCC are still scarce. The objective of the HepaStar study was to collect prospective safety and effectiveness data in a prospective multicenter observational study.

Between January 2017 and December 2022, consecutive participants with unresectable or recurrent HCC treated with DSM-TACE as standard of care at 6 participating centers in Europe were enrolled. Tumor response was evaluated according to the mRECIST criteria. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed by using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5. Liver function deterioration was assessed by monitoring changes in liver blood tests during the follow-up.

Seventy-nine participants (median age, 69 years (IQR, 51-87 years); 67 men (85%)) were enrolled and treated. The median follow-up time was 18 months (IQR 9.5-38.0 months). The estimated median OS and PFS for the entire cohort was 32 months (CI, 95% 21-NaN) and 9 months (CI, 95% 7-NaN), respectively. Eleven (13.9%) participants experienced at least one grade 3 or 4 AE. The most frequent grade 3-4 AE was elevated bilirubin (2.2%, 5 of 79). Deterioration of bilirubin, AST, ALT, and albumin were observed in 24.1%, 23.7%, 19%, and 24% of participants, respectively.

DSM-TACE achieves promising survival in patients with unresectable or recurrent HCC. This technique shows a favorable safety profile both in terms of treatment-related AEs and liver function deterioration.

Question Although degradable starch microspheres transarterial chemoembolization is widely used in clinical practice across Europe, prospective data on its application in hepatocellular carcinoma patients remains limited. Findings Degradable starch microspheres transarterial chemoembolization results in promising survival rates, good tumor response rates, and low rates of treatment-related adverse events. Clinical relevance In patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, degradable starch microspheres transarterial chemoembolization represents a safe and effective alternative to more well-established chemoembolization techniques like conventional transarterial chemoembolization and drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization.

This study aimed to propose a novel approach of lipiodol combined with drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (Lipiodol-DEB TACE) and to compare the safety and efficacy with DEB-TACE alone for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

From the database of four centers, the records of patients with HCC who received DEB-TACE or Lipiodol-DEB TACE as initial treatment were retrospectively evaluated. The tumor response was measured based on the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs) were compared between two groups.

A total of 244 patients were included with 160 patients receiving DEB-TACE and 84 patients receiving Lipiodol-DEB TACE. Lipiodol-DEB TACE group had higher objective response rate (86.9 % vs. 76.3 %), higher disease control rate (97.6 % vs. 88.8 %), longer median OS (42.6 vs. 25.8 months) and longer median PFS (34.0 vs. 17.0 months) than DEB-TACE group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference observed in the incidence of AEs between two groups. Cox analysis identified total bilirubin level, maximum tumor diameter, TACE method and portal vein invasion as independent prognostic factors.

Lipiodol-DEB TACE was a safe option and associated with improved tumor response and survival outcome compared to DEB-TACE alone for selected patients with HCC.

Optimizing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) can enhance treatment efficacy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study compares modified TACE (M-TACE), which combines a lipiodol-based emulsion and drug-eluting beads, with drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) as initial therapies for solitary HCC.

In this retrospective study, 185 patients undergoing M-TACE or DEB-TACE were evaluated. Propensity score matching was used to create 69 balanced pairs. Initial tumor response, repeated treatments within six months, local tumor progression (LTP), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed.

M-TACE exhibited significantly higher initial complete response (CR) rates (39.1% vs. 23.2%, p = 0.043) and fewer repeated treatments within six months (1.7 ± 0.9 vs. 2.1 ± 0.7; p = 0.033) compared to DEB-TACE. LTP rates were notably lower with M-TACE at 12 months (39.1% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.002), and median time to LTP was prolonged with M-TACE (13.3 vs. 8.2 months, p = 0.038). Stratified analysis revealed a significantly longer OS in individuals achieving a CR after the initial M-TACE (50.5 vs. 33.4 months, p = 0.043). However, the overall study population did not exhibit a significant difference in OS between the two groups. Comparable AEs (all p > 0.05) were observed.

M-TACE showed higher initial CR rates, lower LTP rates, and extended time to LTP compared to DEB-TACE, indicating its potential to enhance TACE effectiveness for solitary HCC.

For patients with large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the effectiveness of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains suboptimal, which necessitates the administration of substantial volumes of chemotherapy drugs and lipiodol, thereby increasing the risk of liver failure and other chemotherapy-related complications. Therefore, we devised a strategy of initial hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) followed by sequential drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE). In our treatment design, a lower tumor burden after HAIC facilitated complete embolization of tumor vasculature, and the use of less amount of embolic agents reduced the incidence of liver failure and embolization syndromes.

This retrospective study evaluated consecutive patients with unresectable large HCC with a maximum tumor diameter of ≥7 cm who received FOLFOX-HAIC combined with sequential DEB-TACE from April 2019 to February 2024. Efficacy was evaluated using the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS); and safety was assessed using the frequency of key adverse events (AEs).

Among the 76 patients included, the median maximum tumor diameter was 12.4 cm (range, 7.0-23.4 cm). The overall ORRs based on mRECIST and RECIST 1.1 criteria were 94.1% and 51.5%, respectively. The median OS was 28.1 months (95% CI, 22.7-33.4), and the median PFS was 11.7 months (95% CI, 7.7-15.8). All patients experienced AEs, but only 18.4% experienced grade 3 or 4 AEs, there was no treatment-related mortality.

In this single-center, retrospective study, our results suggested that FOLFOX-HAIC with sequential DEB-TACE demonstrated promising efficacy and safety for patients with unresectable HCC with a maximum tumor diameter of ≥7 cm.

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of 5-Fluorouracil (5-Fu) combined with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) compared to 5-Fu combined with drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) using CalliSpheres for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using propensity score weighting methods. This retrospective analysis included 131 patients with HCC treated with 5-Fu combined with cTACE (5-Fu-cTACE group, n = 65) or DEB-TACE (5-Fu-DEB-TACE group, n = 66) at the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January 2019 to December 2022. Based on the baseline data and laboratory indicators, propensity score weighting was used to reduce confounding bias. Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) were used to evaluate clinical efficacy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were the disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs). PFS was assessed using Kaplan‒Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. The ORRs at 1 month (M1) after treatment in the 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group and 5-Fu-cTACE group were 90.9% and 76.9%, respectively (P = 0.029), while at this time, the DCRs were 93.9% in the 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group and 90.8% in the 5-Fu-cTACE group (P = 0.494). At 3 months (M3) after treatment, the 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group had a higher ORR (84.8% vs. 56.9%, P < 0.001) and DCR (84.8% vs. 72.3%, P = 0.08). The ORR at 6 months (M6) was also higher in the 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group than in the 5-Fu-cTACE group (72.7% vs. 50.8%, P = 0.01). The median PFS after treatment with 5-Fu-DEB-TACE was longer than that after treatment with 5-Fu-cTACE (11 months vs. 6 months) (P = 0.004). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated that 5-Fu-DEB-TACE (HR = 0.590, P = 0.044), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) intermediate risk (HR = 2.470, P = 0.010), BCLC stage B (HR = 2.303, P = 0.036), BCLC stage C (HR = 3.354, P = 0.002) and ascitic fluid (HR = 2.004, P = 0.046) were independent predictors of PFS. No treatment-related deaths occurred in this study. The 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group had a greater incidence of abdominal pain (72.7% vs. 47.7%, P = 0.003). However, the incidence of postoperative elevated transaminase levels was higher in the 5-Fu-cTACE group (83.1% vs. 66.6%, P = 0.031). Subgroups analysis showed patients receiving 5-Fu-DEB-TACE have better PFS compared to those receiving 5-Fu-cTACE in the BCLC stage A group (P = 0.0093), BCLC stage B group (P = 0.0096), multifocal group (P = 0.0056), Child-Pugh stage A group (P<0.001), non- extrahepatic metastasis group (P = 0.022), non-vascular invasion group (P = 0.0093), and the group with a largest tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm (P = 0.0048). At M1, M3, and M6, patients with preserved liver function and in some cases of low tumor burden had higher Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) (P < 0.05). Compared with 5-Fu-cTACE, 5-Fu-DEB-TACE has superior therapeutic efficacy, prolongs PFS, and reduces hepatotoxicity. However, it is associated with an increased incidence of postoperative abdominal pain.

Genetic polymorphisms play a crucial role in predicting treatment efficacy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to evaluate the response to Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) in relation to the genetic polymorphisms of interleukin 28B (IL28B) and angiopoietin-2 (ANGPT2) in HCC patients.

Prospective cohort study conducted on 104 eligible HCC Egyptian patients who underwent TACE using doxorubicin and lipiodol. Genotyping of the IL28B and ANGPT2 genes was performed with laboratory data analysis.

At baseline IL28B rs12979860 genotypes C/T, C/C and T/T appeared in 43.9%, 34.6% and 21.5% while ANGPT2 rs55633437 genotypes C/C, C/A and A/A found in 71.03%, 28.04% and 0.93% of patients respectively. After one month of therapy, 51.4% of patients achieved a complete response. There was a significant difference in relation to IL28B rs12979860 genotypes (p = 0.017) whereas ANGPT2 rs55633437 genotypes (p = 0.432) showed no significant difference in patient response after one month of TACE.

This study demonstrates the effectiveness of TACE in Egyptian HCC patients, as evidenced by low recurrence rates. Furthermore, the IL28B rs12979860 (C/T) gene may be associated with the efficacy and prognosis of TACE treatment in HCC Egyptian patients.

The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (CT.gov identifier: NCT05291338).

Accurate detection of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) feeding vessels during transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is important for an effective treatment, while limiting non-target embolization. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and accuracy of pre-TACE three dimensional (3D) CT angiography for tumor-feeding vessels detection compared to DSA.

Sixty-nine consecutive patients referred for TACE from May 2022 to May 2023 were included. (3D) CT images were reconstructed from the pre-TACE diagnostic multiphasic contrast enhanced CT images and compared with non-selective digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images obtained during TACE for detection of HCC feeding vessels. A "Ground truth" made by consensus between observers after reviewing all available pre-TACE CT images, and DSA and CBCT images during TACE to detect the true feeding vessels was the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), accuracy and ROC curve with AUC were calculated for each modality and compared.

A total of 136 active HCCs were detected in the 69 consecutive patients included in the study. 185 feeding arteries were detected by 3D CT and DSA and included in the analysis. 3D CT detection of feeding arteries revealed mean sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of 91%, 71%, 98%, 36%, and 90%, respectively, with mean AUC = 0.81. DSA detection of feeding arteries revealed mean sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 80%, 58%, 96.5%, 16.5% and 78%, respectively, with mean AUC = 0.69.

Pre-TACE 3D CT angiography has shown promise in improving the detection of HCC feeding vessels compared to DSA. However, further studies are required to confirm these findings across different clinical settings and patient populations.

This study was prospectively registered at Clinicaltrials.gov with ID NCT05304572; Date of registration: 2-4-2022.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and 125I seed implantation are methods used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), PVTT often associated with arterioportal shunts(APS), there are few reports on the combined use of TACE and 125I seed implantation for such patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with PVTT 125I seed implantation in the treatment of HCC patients with APS.

Forty-two patients diagnosed with HCC combined with PVTT and APS between January 2020 and December 2021 were included. Appropriate materials were selected to transarterial embolization of the APS, and 125I seeds were implanted into the PVTT. The occlusion effect was observed and recorded after 3 months, the efficacy of intrahepatic lesions and PVTT was evaluated, and the patient survival, prognostic factors affecting APS recanalization were analyzed.

All 42 patients completed the follow-up three months after treatment. The immediate APS improvement rate was 100%, and the APS improvement rate at the three-month follow-up was 64.29%. The disease control rates of PVTT and intrahepatic lesions were 81.00% and 78.60%, respectively. The patients' 6-month and 12-month survival rates were 78.6% and 46.8%. The median OS for all patients was 11.90 months, and the median OS was 13.30 months in the APS effective treatment group and 8.30 months in the ineffective group. The PVTT type is the only independent factor affecting APS recanalization. (P=0.02).

For HCC patients with PVTT and APS, TACE combine with 125I seed implantation in PVTT is a potentially effective and safe method that contributes to prolonging patient survival.

Great strides have been made identifying molecular and genetic changes expressed by various tumor types. These molecular and genetic changes are used as pharmacologic targets for precision treatment using large molecule (LM) proteins with high specificity. Theranostics exploits these LM biomolecules via radiochemistry, creating sensitive diagnostic and therapeutic agents. Intravenous (i.v.) LM drugs have an extended biopharmaceutical half-life thus resulting in an insufficient therapeutic index, permitting only palliative brachytherapy due to unacceptably high rates of systemic nontarget radiation doses to normal tissue. We employ tumor arteriole embolization isolating a tumor from the systemic circulation, and local intra-arterial (i.a.) infusion to improve uptake of a LM drug within a porcine renal tumor (RT).

In an oncopig RT we assess the in vivo biodistribution of 99mTc-labeled macroaggregated albumin (MAA) a surrogate for a LM theranostics agent in the RT, kidney, liver, spleen, muscle, blood, and urine. Control animals underwent i.v. infusion and experimental group undergoing arteriography with pseudovascular isolation (PVI) followed by direct i.a. injection.

Injected dose per gram (%ID/g) of the LM at 1 min was 86.75 ± 3.76 and remained elevated up to 120 min (89.35 ± 5.77) with i.a. PVI, this increase was statistically significant (SS) compared to i.v. (13.38 ± 1.56 and 12.02 ± 1.05; p = 0.0003 p = 0.0006 at 1 and 120 min respectively). The circulating distribution of LM in the blood was less with i.a. vs i.v. infusion (2.28 ± 0.31 vs 25.17 ± 1.84 for i.v. p = 0.033 at 1 min). Other organs displayed a trend towards less exposure to radiation for i.a. with PVI compared to i.v. which was not SS.

PVI followed by i.a. infusion of a LM drug has the potential to significantly increase the first pass uptake within a tumor. This minimally invasive technique can be translated into clinical practice, potentially rendering monoclonal antibody based radioimmunotherapy a viable treatment for renal tumors.

To assess the prognostic value of Parenchymal Blood Volume (PBV) in predicting survival, tumor response, and PBV response after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

A total of 137 patients with malignant liver tumors who were treated with TACE between 07/2016 and 07/2018 were evaluated. Computed tomography illustrations were reworked at a dedicated workstation to create a PBV map which was overlapped with the associated magnetic resonance image to determine tumor diameter and PBV. Patients were divided into two groups according to their initial PBV value: PBV < 50 or ≥ 50 ml/l.

Retrospectively, for patients with at least 2 TACE and initial PBV < 50 ml/l (n = 27), the tumor volume, regardless of the primary tumor type, decreased by 13.26%, and PBV showed a decrease of 23.11%. For 84 patients with PBV ≥ 50 ml/l, the tumor volume decreased by 24.01%, and PBV showed a more substantial decrease of 44.69% (both p < 0.001). In the overall study population (n = 137), patients with an initial PBV ≥ 50 ml/l (n = 101) survived for an average of 15.05 months, while patients with an initial PBV < 50 ml/l (n = 36) survived for 10.01 months (p < 0.002). Subgroup analysis indicated that median survival in the HCC group was longer at PBV ≥ 50 ml/l. For CRC and other primary tumors, the survival time for high and low initial PBV was almost identical.

Our study reveals a noteworthy correlation between high initial PBV values and a significant reduction in both relative and absolute tumor volume. This association suggests a potential prognostic indicator, indicating that elevated PBV may signify a more favorable response to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Additionally, patients with high initial PBV values experienced an extended overall survival time. Notably, the subgroup analysis highlighted a prolonged survival time in the HCC group with elevated initial PBV values. These findings underscore the potential significance of assessing PBV as a predictive factor in the context of TACE, especially in specific tumor entities such as HCC. Further investigations are essential to validate and extrapolate these observations to optimize patient outcomes.

The liver is affected by two groups of malignant tumours: primary liver cancers and liver metastases. Liver metastases are significantly more common than primary liver cancer, and five-year survival after radical surgical treatment of liver metastases ranges from 28% to 50%, depending on primary cancer site. However, R0 resection (resection for cure) is not feasible in most people; therefore, other treatments have to be considered in the case of non-resectability. One possible option is based on the concept that the blood supply to hepatic tumours originates predominantly from the hepatic artery. Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) of the peripheral branches of the hepatic artery can be achieved by administering a chemotherapeutic drug followed by vascular occlusive agents and can lead to selective necrosis of the cancer tissue while leaving normal liver parenchyma virtually unaffected. The entire procedure can be performed without infusion of chemotherapy and is then called bland transarterial embolisation (TAE). These procedures are usually applied over a few sessions. Another possible treatment option is systemic chemotherapy which, in the case of colorectal cancer metastases, is most commonly performed using FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) and FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan) regimens applied in multiple sessions over a long period of time. These therapies disrupt the cell cycle, leading to death of rapidly dividing malignant cells. Current guidelines determine the role of TAE and TACE as non-curative treatment options applicable in people with liver-only or liver-dominant metastatic disease that is unresectable or non-ablatable, and in people who have failed systemic chemotherapy. Regarding the treatment modalities in people with colorectal cancer liver metastases, we found no systematic reviews comparing the efficacy of TAE or TACE versus systemic chemotherapy.

To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of transarterial embolisation (TAE) or transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) compared with systemic chemotherapy in people with liver-dominant unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.

We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and three additional databases up to 4 April 2024. We also searched two trials registers and the European Medicines Agency database and checked reference lists of retrieved publications.

We included randomised clinical trials assessing beneficial and harmful effects of TAE or TACE versus systemic chemotherapy in adults (aged 18 years or older) with colorectal cancer liver metastases.

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality; overall survival (time to mortality); and any adverse events or complications. Our secondary outcomes were cancer mortality; health-related quality of life; progression-free survival; proportion of participants dying or surviving with progression of the disease; time to progression of liver metastases; recurrence of liver metastases; and tumour response measures (complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease). For the purpose of the review and to perform necessary analyses, whenever possible, we converted survival rates to mortality rates, as this was our primary outcome. For the analysis of dichotomous outcomes, we used the risk ratio (RR); for continuous outcomes, we used the mean difference; and for time to event outcomes, we calculated hazard ratios (HRs), all with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used the standardised mean difference with 95% CIs when the trials used different instruments. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. We based our conclusions on outcomes analysed at the longest follow-up.

We included three trials with 118 participants randomised to TACE versus 120 participants to systemic chemotherapy. Four participants were excluded; one due to disease progression prior to treatment and three due to decline in health. The trials reported data on one or more outcomes. Two trials were performed in China and one in Italy. The trials differed in terms of embolisation techniques and chemotherapeutic agents. Follow-up ranged from 12 months to 50 months. TACE may reduce mortality at longest follow-up (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94; 3 trials, 234 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. TACE may have little to no effect on overall survival (time to mortality) (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.01; 1 trial, 70 participants; very low-certainty evidence), any adverse events or complications (3 trials, 234 participants; very low-certainty evidence), health-related quality of life (2 trials, 154 participants; very low-certainty evidence), progression-free survival (1 trial, 70 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and tumour response measures (presented as the overall response rate) (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.96; 3 trials, 234 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but the evidence is very uncertain. No trials reported cancer mortality, proportion of participants dying or surviving with progression of the disease, and recurrence of liver metastases. We found no trials comparing the effects of TAE versus systemic chemotherapy in people with colorectal cancer liver metastases.

The evidence regarding effectiveness of TACE versus systemic chemotherapy in people with colorectal cancer liver metastases is of very low certainty and is based on three trials. Our confidence in the results is limited due to the risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision. It is very uncertain whether TACE confers benefits with regard to reduction in mortality, overall survival (time to mortality), reduction in adverse events or complications, improvement in health-related quality of life, improvement in progression-free survival, and tumour response measures (presented as the overall response rate). Data on cancer mortality, proportion of participants dying or surviving with progression of the disease, and recurrence of liver metastases are lacking. We found no trials assessing TAE versus systemic chemotherapy. More randomised clinical trials are needed to strengthen the body of evidence and provide insight into the benefits and harms of TACE or TAE in comparison with systemic chemotherapy in people with liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

For patients with large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the effectiveness of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) remains suboptimal. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of modified TACE using low-dose chemotherapy with blank microspheres (BMS-TACE) plus low-dose lenvatinib (LD-LEN) and microwave ablation (MWA) in patients with large unresectable HCC.

In this prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study, patients with unresectable HCC exceeding the up-to-seven criteria, with maximum tumor diameter ≥7 cm, and without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastases, received initial BMS-TACE (lipiodol, low-dose doxorubicin, and lobaplatin up to 30 mg each, and blank microspheres; subsequently modified and repeated in most patients) plus LD-LEN (4-8 mg/day) and MWA. The primary endpoint was downstaging rate (DSR); secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events.

From November 2019 to March 2022, 43 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 21.2 months. Median largest tumor diameter was 11.2 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 7-25). Following BMS-TACE and LD-LEN, downstaging occurred in 37 (86.0%) patients, 32 of whom received MWA, and 8 of whom had a complete response (CR) without MWA. ORR was 93.0% (CR in 32 [74.4%] and partial response in 8 [18.6%] patients). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year PFS rates were 57.5%, 25.9%, and 18.1%, respectively (median PFS, 14.7 months [95% CI: 8.1-19.5]). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 85.8%, 67.7%, and 61.6%, respectively (median OS, 36.4 months [95% CI: 26.8-not reached]). After BMS-TACE, a significant decline in CD11b+/CD33+/HLA-DR- myeloid-derived suppressor cells and early elevation in CXCR5+/CD8+ and CXCR5+/CD4+ T cells were observed (both p < 0.05).

BMS-TACE plus LD-LEN and MWA resulted in promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity in patients with large unresectable HCC exceeding the up-to-seven criteria with a maximum tumor diameter ≥7 cm and without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastases.

The efficacy and safety of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) and conventional TACE (c-TACE) in the treatment of patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remained controversial. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between c-TACE and DEB-TACE among patients with ICC.

Between June 10, 2016 and November 19, 2022, consecutive patients with pathological diagnoses of ICC were divided into the DEB-TACE group and the c-TACE group based on the type of TACE treatment they received. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the characteristics between the c-TACE group and the DEB-TACE group.

A total of 132 patients were included in this study, with 64 patients in the c-TACE group and 68 patients in the DEB-TACE group. The median OS for c-TACE and DEB-TACE was 5 and 12 months, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) for c-TACE and DEB-TACE was 0 % and 66.2 %, respectively; the disease control rate (DCR) was 37.5 % and 91.2 %. There were no significant differences between c-TACE and DEB-TACE among adverse effects at 3 months after treatment (P > 0.05). The results remained consistent after PSM. The Cox regression demonstrated that the DEB-TACE was an independent protective factor for OS.

Patients in the DEB-TACE group had longer OS and higher ORR and DCR than those in the c-TACE group, but no significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding adverse effects.

Combination transarterial embolization and ablation is an increasingly common strategy for treating solitary, non-resectable hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) greater than 3 cm in size. However, manufacturer guidelines do not provide information as to the size of the ablation zone after embolization. This can put the patient at risk for inadvertent thermal damage to nearby anatomy such as the liver capsule, biliary ducts, diaphragm, and body wall. Thus, while combination therapy is associated with improved clinical outcomes, it is also associated with a higher complication rate. The goal of this study was to create a numerical model to evaluate the change in perfusion in embolization and correlate the perfusional change with final microwave ablation volume. This relationship was then validated in combination embolization ablation therapy in an in-vivo porcine liver model, using a novel MR perfusion sequence.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the standard treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Given the lack of specific recommendations for conventional TACE (cTACE) and drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) in patients having unresectable HCC with tumor infiltrating the common hepatic duct or the first-order branch of the bile ducts (B1-type bile duct invasion; B1-BDI) after biliary drainage, we retrospectively compared the safety and efficacy of DEB-TACE with cTACE in this patient population.

Using data from five tertiary medical centers (January 2017-December 2021), we compared complications, overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and tumor response rate between patients having unresectable HCC with B1-BDI who underwent DEB-TACE or cTACE after successful biliary drainage. X-tile software calculated the pre-TACE total bilirubin (TBil) cutoff value, indicating optimal timing for sequential TACE after drainage. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed.

The study included 108 patients with unresectable HCC (B1-BDI) who underwent DEB-TACE and 114 who received cTACE as initial treatment. After PSM (n = 53 for each group), the DEB-TACE group had a longer TTP (8.9 vs. 6.7 months, p = 0.038) and higher objective response rate (64.2% vs. 39.6%, p = 0.011) than did the cTACE group, although OS was comparable (16.7 vs. 15.3 months, p = 0.115). The DEB-TACE group exhibited fewer post-procedural increments in the mean albumin-bilirubin score, TBil, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), along with a significantly lower incidence of serious adverse events within 30 days (hepatic failure, ALT increase, and TBil increase) than the cTACE group (all p < 0.05). The pre-TACE TBil cutoff value was 99 μmol/L; patients with higher values (>99 μmol/L) had poorer OS in both groups (p < 0.05).

DEB-TACE is safe and effective after successful biliary drainage in unresectable HCC with B1-BDI, potentially better than cTACE in terms of liver toxicity, TTP, and ORR. Lowering TBil below 99 μmol/L through successful drainage may create ideal conditions for sequential TACE.

Current guidelines do not indicate any comprehensive management of hepatic hypervascular incidentalomas (HVIs) discovered in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients during intra-arterial therapies (IATs). This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of HVIs detected on per-interventional cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) during IAT for HCC in patients waiting for liver transplantation (LT).

In this retrospective single-institutional study, all liver-transplanted HCC patients between January 2014 and December 2018 who received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or radioembolization (TARE) before LT were included. The number of ≥10 mm HCCs diagnosed on contrast-enhanced pre-interventional imaging (PII) was compared with that detected on per-interventional CBCT with a nonparametric Wilcoxon test. The correlation between the presence of an HVI and histopathological criteria associated with poor prognosis (HPP) on liver explants was investigated using the chi-square test. Tumor recurrence (TR) and TR-related mortality were investigated using the chi-square test. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), TR-related survival (TRRS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed according to the presence of HVI using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Among 63 included patients (average age: 59 ± 7 years, H/F = 50/13), 36 presented HVIs on per-interventional CBCT. The overall nodule detection rate of per-interventional CBCT was superior to that of PII (median at 3 [Q1:2, Q3:5] vs. 2 [Q1:1, Q3:3], respectively, p < 0.001). No significant correlation was shown between the presence of HVI and HPP (p = 0.34), TR (p = 0.095), and TR-related mortality (0.22). Kaplan-Meier analysis did not show a significant impact of the presence of HVI on RFS (p = 0.07), TRRS (0.48), or OS (p = 0.14).

These results may indicate that the treatment plan during IAT should not be impacted or modified in response to HVI detection.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has become the standard of care for the treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, current clinical practice guidelines lack consensus on the best selection of a specific TACE technique. This study aims to compare safety, tumor response, and progression-free survival (PFS) of conventional TACE (cTACE), drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE), and degradable starch microsphere TACE (DSM-TACE).

This retrospective study included n = 192 patients with HCC who underwent first TACE with unbiased follow-up at 4-6 weeks at our center between 2008 and 2021. Eligibility for TACE was BCLC intermediate stage B, bridging/down-staging (B/D) to liver transplantation (LT), or any other stage when patients were not suitable for resection, LT, local ablation, or systemic therapy. Patients were grouped into three cohorts (n = 45 cTACE, n = 84 DEB-TACE, n = 63 DSM-TACE), and further categorized by TACE indication (B/D or palliative). Liver function and adverse events, response assessed by the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) 4-6 weeks post-TACE and PFS were analyzed.

There were no significant differences in age, gender distribution, BCLC stage, or etiology of liver disease among the three TACE groups, even in the B/D or palliative subgroups. DEB-TACE induced slight increases in bilirubin in the palliative subgroup and in lactate dehydrogenase in the entire cohort 4-6 weeks post-TACE, and more adverse events in the palliative subgroup. DEB-TACE and DSM-TACE showed significantly higher disease control rates (complete and partial response, stable disease) compared to cTACE, especially in the B/D setting (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in PFS between the groups [median PFS (months): cTACE, 10.0 vs. DEB, 7.0 vs. DSM, 10.0; p = 0.436].

Our study provides valuable perspectives in the decision-making for a specific TACE technique: DEB-TACE and DSM-TACE showed improved tumor response. DEB-TACE showed a prolonged impact on liver function and more side effects, so patients with impaired liver function should be more strictly selected, especially in the palliative subgroup.

Conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) utilizing ethiodized oil as a chemotherapy carrier has become a standard treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has been adopted as a bridging and downstaging therapy for liver transplantation. Water-in-oil emulsion made up of ethiodized oil and chemotherapy solution is retained in tumor vasculature resulting in high tissue drug concentration and low systemic chemotherapy doses. The density and distribution pattern of ethiodized oil within the tumor on post-treatment imaging are predictive of the extent of tumor necrosis and duration of response to treatment. This review describes the multiple roles of ethiodized oil, particularly in its role as a biomarker of tumor response to cTACE. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: With the increasing complexity of locoregional therapy options, including the use of combination therapies, treatment response assessment has become challenging; Ethiodized oil deposition patterns can serve as an imaging biomarker for the prediction of treatment response, and perhaps predict post-treatment prognosis. KEY POINTS: • Treatment response assessment after locoregional therapy to hepatocellular carcinoma is fraught with multiple challenges given the varied post-treatment imaging appearance. • Ethiodized oil is unique in that its' radiopacity can serve as an imaging biomarker to help predict treatment response. • The pattern of deposition of ethiodozed oil has served as a mechanism to detect portions of tumor that are undertreated and can serve as an adjunct to enhancement in order to improve management in patients treated with intraarterial embolization with ethiodized oil.

Background: The predictive value of Lipiodol was evaluated for response evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) by analysis of the enhancement pattern during angiography and in postinterventional computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 30 patients (mean age 63 years, range: 36 to 82 years, 22 males) with HCC. Patients received three Lipiodol-based cTACE sessions, each followed by an unenhanced CT within 24-h. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was acquired before and after the treatment to determine tumor response. Lipiodol enhancement pattern, tumor vascularization, and density were evaluated by angiography and CT. Initial tumor size and response to cTACE were analyzed by MRI according to modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) in a 4-week follow-up. Results: Analysis of HCC lesions (68 lesions in 30 patients) during cTACE revealed clear visibility and hypervascularization in angiography as a potential independent parameter able to predict tumor response. A significant correlation was found for response measurements by volume (p = 0.012), diameter (p = 0.006), and according to mRECIST (p = 0.039). The amount of Lipiodol and enhancement pattern in postinterventional CT did not correlate with therapy response. Measurements of Hounsfield unit values after cTACE do not allow sufficient prediction of the tumor response. Conclusion: Hypervascularized HCC lesions with clear visibility after Lipiodol administration in the angiography respond significantly better to cTACE compared to hypo- or nonvascularized lesions.

Liver metastases are the most common malignancy found in the liver and are 20 to 40 times more common than primary hepatic tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients with liver metastases often present with advanced disease and are not eligible for curative-intent surgery or ablative techniques. The unique hepatic arterial blood supply of liver metastases allows interventional radiologists to target these tumors with transarterial therapies. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been studied in the treatment of liver metastases originating from a variety of primary malignancies and has demonstrated benefits in terms of hepatic progression-free survival, overall survival, and symptomatic relief, among other benefits. Depending on the primary tumor from which they originate, liver metastases may have different indications for TACE, may utilize different TACE regimens and techniques, and may result in different post-procedural outcomes. This review offers an overview of TACE techniques and specific considerations in the treatment of liver metastases, provides an in-depth review of TACE in the treatment of liver metastases originating from colorectal cancer, neuroendocrine tumor, and uveal melanoma, which represent some of the many tumors beyond hepatocellular carcinoma that can be treated by TACE, and summarizes data regarding when one should consider TACE in their treatment algorithms.

To develop and validate a CT-based radiomics model for the prediction of the overall survival (OS) of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) treated with drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE).

Patients were retrospectively enrolled from two institutions for the constitution of training (n = 69) and validation (n = 31) cohorts with a median follow-up of 15 months. A total of 396 radiomics features were extracted from each baseline CT image. Features selected by variable importance and minimal depth were used for random survival forest model construction. The performance of the model was assessed using the concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, integrated discrimination index (IDI), net reclassification index (NRI), and decision curve analysis.

Type of PVTT and tumor number were proved to be significant clinical indicators for OS. Arterial phase images were used to extract radiomics features. Three radiomics features were selected for model construction. The C-index for the radiomics model was 0.759 in the training cohort and 0.730 in the validation cohort. To improve the predictive performance, clinical indicators were integrated into the radiomics model to form a combined model with a C-index of 0.814 in the training cohort and 0.792 in the validation cohort. The IDI was significant in both cohorts for the combined model versus the radiomics model in predicting 12-month OS.

Type of PVTT and tumor number affected the OS of HCC patients with PVTT treated with DEB-TACE. Moreover, the combined clinical-radiomics model had a satisfactory performance.

A CT-based radiomics nomogram, which consisted of 3 radiomics features and 2 clinical indicators, was recommended to predict 12-month overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombus initially treated with drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization.

• Type of portal vein tumor thrombus and tumor number were significant predictors of the OS. • Integrated discrimination index and net reclassification index provided a quantitative evaluation of the incremental impact added by new indicators for the radiomics model. • A nomogram based on a radiomics signature and clinical indicators showed satisfactory performance in predicting OS after DEB-TACE.

Liver transplantation (LT) is the recommended curative-intent treatment for patients with early or intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are ineligible for resection. Imaging plays a central role in staging and for selecting the best LT candidates. This review will discuss recent developments in pre-LT imaging assessment, in particular LT eligibility criteria on imaging, the technical requirements and the diagnostic performance of imaging for the pre-LT diagnosis of HCC including the recent Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) criteria, the evaluation of the response to locoregional therapy, as well as the non-invasive prediction of HCC aggressiveness and its impact on the outcome of LT. We will also briefly discuss the role of nuclear medicine in the pre-LT evaluation and the emerging role of artificial intelligence models in patients with HCC.

To evaluate the efficacy of combination therapy using transarterial chemoembolization with microwave ablation (MWA) therapy vs. MWA monotherapy for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) >3 cm in size.

This two-arm retrospective observational study included patients with HCCs >3 cm who underwent either combination therapy (29 patients) or MWA monotherapy (35 patients) between 2014 and 2020. The treatment outcomes related to primary treatment efficacy, local tumor progression (LTP), tumor control rate, and overall survival were compared between each cohort.

The technical success and primary efficacy were 96.56% and 100.00% in the combination therapy cohort, and 91.42% and 100.00% in the MWA cohort, respectively, over a mean follow-up period of 27.6 months. The 1- and 3-year rates of LTP-free survival were 78.57% and 69.56% in the combination therapy cohort, vs. 72.45% and 35.44% in the MWA cohort, respectively (P = 0.001). The overall progression-free survival was longer in the combination therapy cohort compared with the MWA cohort (median: 56.0 vs. 13.0 months; P = 0.017). With the incorporation of additional locoregional therapy, the overall survival rates were not significantly different, with 1- and 3-year overall survival rates of 100.00% and 88.71% in the combination therapy cohort and rates of 90.15% and 82.76% in the MWA cohort, respectively (P = 0.235).

The combination therapy provided significantly longer upfront LTP-free survival in HCCs >3 cm when compared with the MWA treatment alone, albeit with similar local tumor control and overall survival rates when accounting for additional locoregional therapies.

This study aimed to assess the treatment response, survival outcomes, and safety of a novel transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) technique with a three-stage mixed chemoembolic regimen (M-TACE) in patients with large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) measuring more than 5 cm in maximum diameter.

Between January 2017 and March 2023, a total of 82 patients were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Treatment response was assessed in the first month after M-TACE; progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. The prognostic factors associated with patient survival were statistically analyzed by the Cox regression model. Adverse events were recorded.

The maximum diameter of the tumors ranged from 5.3 cm to 20.0 cm (mean 10.71 cm). The objective response (OR) and disease control rates were 74.4 and 92.7%, respectively, at 1-month follow-up. The median survival time was 22 months (95% CI, 13.10-30.90 months). The OS rates were 82.0% at six months, 62.5% at one year, and 43.0% at two years. Targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy (P=0.001) and tumor response at one month (P=0.020) were protective factors for OS. In terms of safety, no major complications occurred and the only observed decrease within the normal range occurred in albumin and platelet levels one month after the embolization procedure. This decrease in levels did not show a significant relationship with the OR rates.

M-TACE demonstrated a promising objective tumor response, making it a viable and effective treatment option for patients with large unresectable HCC.

CalliSpheres® is a microsphere that is already widely used for primary liver cancer treatment; however, its application in colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) is limited. The current study aimed to investigate the efficacy of CalliSpheres® drug-eluting bead (DEB) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) therapy versus (vs.) conventional cTACE therapy in treating refractory CRLM (RCRLM) patients.

Twenty-two RCRLM patients who underwent CalliSpheres® DEB-TACE therapy (n = 11) or cTACE therapy (n = 11) were retrospectively analyzed. Data on clinical response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were retrieved.

The objective response rate (36.4% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.338) and disease control rate (81.8% vs. 54.4%, P = 0.170) were both numerically (but not statistically) higher in the DEB-TACE group than in the cTACE group. Meanwhile, PFS was prolonged in the DEB-TACE group compared with the cTACE group [median: 12.0 (95% CI: 5.6-18.4) vs. 4.0 (95% CI: 0.9-7.1) months, P = 0.018]; OS was also longer in the DEB-TACE group compared with the cTACE group [median: 24.0 (95% CI: 18.3-29.7) vs. 14.0 (95% CI: 7.1-20.9) months, P = 0.040]. In addition, after adjustment by multivariate Cox analyses, DEB-TACE was superior to cTACE independently regarding PFS (HR: 0.110, 95% CI: 0.026-0.463, P = 0.003) and OS (HR: 0.126, 95% CI: 0.028-0.559, P = 0.006).

CalliSpheres® DEB-TACE therapy may prolong survival profile than cTACE therapy in RCRLM patients, while further validation is still needed.

To assess the incidence and predictive factors of abdominal pain following transarterial hepatic chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

In this single-center retrospective cohort study, abdominal pain was defined as a score of 4 or more within 72 h after TACE and requiring additional drug intervention. Patient, tumor characteristics, and technical factors associated with severe pain were identified using the decision tree and binary logistic regression model.

Of 220 patients who were included in the study, 126 (57.3%) had abdominal pain after 206 of 420 TACE procedures (49.0%). A predictive model built based on the logistic regression identified the drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB-TACE) (odds ratio [OR] = 3.340; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.169-5.141), the number of tumors (OR = 2.235; 95% CI 1.060-4.713), embolization of both hepatic lobes (OR = 2.310; 95% CI 1.109-4.813), and concomitant extrahepatic artery embolism (OR = 2.654; 95% CI 1.227-5.739) as the independent predictors of severe abdominal pain. Similarly, the decision tree confirmed the DEB-TACE as the strongest predictor of subsequent performance, followed by the history of hepatectomy and the embolization in the right or both lobes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the classification prediction effect of the two models was 0.706 for the logistic regression and 0.676 for the decision tree. Internal validation results show that the accuracy of logistic regression model prediction was 71.4%.

The model suggests that DEB-TACE and multiple treatment sites are predictors of abdominal pain after TACE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. It may help improve nursing management practices.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was introduced in 1977 with the administration of chemotherapeutic agent to gelatin sponge particles through the hepatic artery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and was established as conventional TACE using Lipiodol in the 1980s. In the 2000s, drug-eluting beads were developed and applied clinically. Currently, TACE is a commonly used non-surgical treatment modality for patients with HCC who are unsuitable for curative treatment. Considering the vital role of TACE in the management of HCC, it is crucial to organize current knowledge and expert opinions regarding patient preparation, procedural techniques, and post-treatment care in TACE, which can enhance therapeutic efficacy and safety. A group of 12 experts in the fields of interventional radiology and hepatology, convened by the Research Committee of the Korean Liver Cancer Association (KLCA), has developed expert consensus-based practical recommendations in TACE. These recommendations have been endorsed by the Korean Society of Interventional Radiology and provide useful information and direction in performing TACE procedure as well as pre- and post- procedural patient care.

Background Hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) can be divided into proliferative and nonproliferative types, which may have implications for outcomes after conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE). Biopsy to identify proliferative HCC is not routinely performed before cTACE. Purpose To develop and validate a predictive model for identifying proliferative HCCs using CT imaging features and to compare therapeutic outcomes between predicted proliferative and nonproliferative HCCs after cTACE according to this model. Materials and Methods This retrospective multicenter study included adults with HCC who underwent liver resection or cTACE between August 2013 and December 2020. A CT-based predictive model for identifying proliferative HCCs was developed and externally validated in a cohort that underwent resection. Diagnostic performance was calculated for the model. Thereafter, patients in the cTACE cohort were stratified into groups with predicted proliferative or nonproliferative HCCs according to the model. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were tumor response rate and progression-free survival (PFS). These were compared between the two groups with use of the χ2 test and the log-rank test. Results A total of 1194 patients (1021 men; mean age, 54 years ± 12 [SD]; median follow-up time, 29.1 months) were included. The predictive model, named the SMARS score, incorporated lobulated shape, mosaic architecture, α-fetoprotein levels, rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, and satellite lesions. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the SMARS score was 0.83 for the training cohort and 0.80 for the validation cohort. According to the SMARS score, patients with predicted proliferative HCCs (n = 114) had lower tumor response rate (48% vs 71%; P < .001) and worse PFS (6.6 months vs 12.4 months; P < .001) and OS (14.4 months vs 38.7 months; P < .001) than those with nonproliferative HCCs (n = 263). Conclusion The predictive model demonstrated good performance for identifying proliferative HCCs. According to the SMARS score, patients with predicted proliferative HCCs have worse prognosis than those with predicted nonproliferative HCCs after cTACE. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article.

To compare the efficacy, overall survival (OS) and safety of drug-eluting beads-TACE (DEB-TACE) and C-TACE as initial treatment in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with main portal vein tumor thrombus (mPVTT).

The medical records of consecutive advanced HCC patients with mPVTT who underwent initial DEB-TACE or C-TACE from September 2015 to October 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. Treatment crossover was allowed in this retrospective research. The adverse events, disease control rate (DCR), time to tumor progression (TTP) and OS of patients who underwent DEB-TACE were compared with those of patients who underwent C-TACE.

Eighty-three patients were included: 42 patients in DEB-TACE group and 41 patients in C-TACE group. DEB-TACE could be safely performed in HCC patients with mPVTT, and they gained a better DCR than those submitted to the C-TACE (76.2% vs. 53.7%, P = 0.031), which might have resulted in longer TTP (median TTP: 9.0 months vs. 3.0 months, P < 0.001). Furthermore, DEB-TACE showed significant OS benefits compared with C-TACE (median OS: 12.0 months vs. 5.0 months, P < 0.001). DEB-TACE, absence of arterioportal shunts (APS), leisons with capsular non-infiltration were found to be independent prognostic factors for better OS. Furthermore, subgroup analysis proved that patients with good DCR gained longer OS in DEB-TACE group.

DEB-TACE could be safely performed and improve the DCR of HCC patients with mPVTT, which resulting in longer TTP and OS, compared with C-TACE.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was introduced in 1977 with the administration of chemotherapeutic agent to gelatin sponge particles through the hepatic artery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and was established as conventional TACE using Lipiodol in the 1980s. In the 2000s, drug-eluting beads were developed and applied clinically. Currently, TACE is a commonly used non-surgical treatment modality for patients with HCC who are unsuitable for curative treatment. Considering the vital role of TACE in the management of HCC, it is crucial to organize current knowledge and expert opinions regarding patient preparation, procedural techniques, and post-treatment care in TACE, which can enhance therapeutic efficacy and safety. A group of 12 experts in the fields of interventional radiology and hepatology, convened by the Research Committee of the Korean Liver Cancer Association (KLCA), has developed expert consensus-based practical recommendations in TACE. These recommendations have been endorsed by the Korean Society of Interventional Radiology and provide useful information and direction in performing TACE procedure as well as pre- and post- procedural patient care.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) was introduced in 1977 with the administration of chemotherapeutic agent to gelatin sponge particles through the hepatic artery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and was established as conventional TACE using Lipiodol in the 1980s. In the 2000s, drug-eluting beads were developed and applied clinically. Currently, TACE is a commonly used non-surgical treatment modality for patients with HCC who are unsuitable for curative treatment. Considering the vital role of TACE in the management of HCC, it is crucial to organize current knowledge and expert opinions regarding patient preparation, procedural techniques, and post-treatment care in TACE, which can enhance therapeutic efficacy and safety. A group of 12 experts in the fields of interventional radiology and hepatology, convened by the Research Committee of the Korean Liver Cancer Association (KLCA), has developed expert consensus-based practical recommendations in TACE. These recommendations have been endorsed by the Korean Society of Interventional Radiology and provide useful information and direction in performing TACE procedure as well as pre- and post-procedural patient care.