Regarding left-sided approaches to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, there is no established method for dissecting the pancreatic head plexus (PhPL) on the right side of the SMA. We developed a PhPL hanging technique for mesopancreas dissection.

A complete dissection around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) with artery-first concept is crucial during pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancers. The left-posterior (LP) approach to the SMA may be effective during robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD), but data on its technical feasibility and clinical outcomes are limited.

We retrospectively reviewed 83 RPD patients utilizing the LP approach, dividing them into early (n = 42) and late (n = 41) groups to assess procedural maturity. The LP approach was initiated at the first phase of resection to achieve circumferential SMA dissection from the left and posterior aspect and early vascular control through ligation of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery (IPDA). Postoperative short-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.

The late group demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (518 vs. 626 min; p < .01) and higher rates of IPDA ligation (90% vs. 71%; p = .03). The median blood loss in the late group was 50 mL (65 mL in the early group; p = .39). Lymph node retrieval number was 17 in both (p = .81), and R0 resection was achieved in all late group cases (96% in the early group; p = .35).

With experience from approximately 80 cases, the LP approach for RPD has enabled precise SMA dissection and early vascular control. A stable and super-magnified caudal view provided by robotic surgery is particularly advantageous for this approach.

Background: This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine plus S-1-based chemoradiotherapy (GS-CRT) among patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), especially among those with unresectable locally advanced (UR-LA) cases. Methods: A total of 351 consecutive PDAC patients were enrolled and prognostic predictors of disease-specific survival (DSS) were identified. Results: The treatment completion rate was 98.9% and Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 181 cases (51.6%). Among 319 re-evaluated patients, pancreatectomy was performed in 184 (57.7%). Based on resectability, the 5-year DSS rates for the entire cohort were 39.6% (R), 43.8% (BR-PV), 21.2% (BR-A) and 13.3% (UR-LA), while the predictors of DSS were performance status (PS), hemoglobin (Hb) level, celiac artery (CA) involvement of ≥180 degrees and JPS 8th T category. In the resected cases, the predictors of DSS were preoperative PS, preoperative CA19-9 level, preoperative JPS-T factor, degree of histological response and adjuvant chemotherapy. In UR-LA resected patients, preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI), absence of pathological venous invasion and adjuvant chemotherapy were predictors of DSS. Conclusions: Even though Grade 3 or higher adverse events were encountered in about half of the cases, they were uneventfully managed. Therefore, GS-CRT is safe and highly tolerable with potential to improve patients' prognosis. Preoperative PS, CA19-9 levels and histological response are important prognostic factors, as well as adjuvant therapy. In UR-LA patients, prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and adjuvant chemotherapy were important for curative intent surgery.

The effectiveness and preferred reconstruction methods of pancreatectomy associated with vein resection (PAVR) for pancreatic cancer, especially for the extensive portal vein/superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resections (more than 4 cm), are still subjects of debate. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of PAVR by analyzing data from two large institutions from different regions.

From 2008 to 2018, we identified consecutive series of patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent PAVR at Karolinska University Hospital (KUH), Sweden, and Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation of Cancer Research (JFCR), Japan. Both institutions adopted the artery-first approach to enhance surgical precision. This study compared the short- and long-term outcomes, vein resection types, and reconstruction methods between the two centers.

A total of 506 patients who underwent PAVR were identified, 211 patients were from KUH and 295 patients were from JFCR. A higher incidence of total pancreatectomy was identified at KUH (24.6 % vs 0.3 %). There were no significant differences in intraoperative estimated blood loss (KUH: 630 ml, JFCR: 600 ml), severe complications rate (8.5 %, 5.1 %), and mortality (2.4 %, 0.7 %). Primary end-to-end anastomosis was primarily performed even if the length of PV/SMV resection was 5 cm or more and achieved successfully with acceptable patency (No thrombus rate: overall cases, 98.0 %; 5 cm or more, 93.5 %).

We report favorable outcomes of PAVR for pancreatic cancer from two high-volume centers in the east and west. Primary end-to-end anastomosis was safe and feasible even if the length of PV/SMV resection was 5 cm or more.

Surgical management of pancreas cancer is complex, including the timing of surgery, surgical approach, intraoperative techniques, and postoperative management, which are reviewed in detail in this manuscript. Ultimately, referral to a high-volume pancreatic surgeon or pancreatic surgery center is critical to ensuring appropriate short-term and long-term outcomes.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with superior mesenteric artery (SMA) left posterior first approach and circumferential lymphadenectomy with total meso-pancreas (MP) dissection for periampullary malignancies.

31 patients who underwent LPD with left posterior SMA first-approach and circumferential lymphadenectomy with total MP dissection between September 2021 and September 2023. General characteristics, operative techniques, short-term outcomes and pathological results were prospectively evaluated.

The mean operation time and SMA first-approach time were 441.9 ± 73.7 min and 99.9 ± 27.7 min, respectively. The median intraoperative blood loss was 143 ml (range: 50-1500 ml). The median number of total LNs and left-sided SMA LNs harvested were 32,7 ± 13 (16-74) and 7,4 ± 6 (range: 3-30), respectively. The rate of metastatic left-sided SMA LNs and meso-pancreas were 25.8% and 22.6%, respectively. 22.6% of patients had pancreatic fistula, but mostly in grade A, with only one case that required conversion. Only one case developed postoperative refractory diarrhea. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 14.1 days. No 90-day mortality was reported.

LPD with left posterior SMA first-approach and circumferential lymphadenectomy with total MP dissection was safe and effective with favorable short-term outcomes.

The long-term survival rate of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has improved alongside the development of multidisciplinary treatment, and there is now demand for less invasive surgery that maintains postoperative pancreatic function. We evaluated the efficacy of pancreas-preserving distal pancreatectomy in terms of oncologic parameters and postoperative pancreatic function.

The data of 98 consecutive patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma between 2012 and 2022 in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. The surgical outcomes, overall survival, and postoperative pancreatic function were compared between pancreas-preserving distal pancreatectomy, in which the pancreatic stump was distal to the left margin of the portal vein on postoperative computed tomography, and conventional distal pancreatectomy.

Sixteen patients (16%) underwent pancreas-preserving distal pancreatectomy. Fewer lymph nodes were dissected in the pancreas-preserving distal pancreatectomy group than the conventional distal pancreatectomy group (19 vs 31, respectively; P < .01); however, the R0 resection rate (94% vs 93%, respectively; P = 1.00), recurrence-free survival, and overall survival were similar. Similar results were obtained in an analysis limited to patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the pancreatic tail. Patients who underwent pancreas-preserving distal pancreatectomy were less likely to develop worsening of their diabetes than those who underwent conventional distal pancreatectomy (19% vs 39%, respectively; P = .16). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease newly developed in 22% of the patients who underwent conventional distal pancreatectomy but in none of those who underwent pancreas-preserving distal pancreatectomy (P = .04).

The pancreatic transection site should be distally located to preserve postoperative pancreatic function when R0 resection can be achieved.

The superior mesenteric artery (SMA)-first approach for pancreatic cancer (PC) is common surgical technique in pancreaticoduodenectomy. To date, few studies have reported SMA-first approach in robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD). Herein, we present the anterior SMA-first approach for PC during RPD.

A 75-year-old man with resectable PC underwent RPD after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. As pancreatic head tumor contacted with the superior mesenteric vein (SMV), the anterior SMA approach was applied. After the mesenteric Kocher maneuver, the jejunum was divided and the left side of the SMA was dissected. Subsequently, the anterior plane of the SMA was dissected. Following the division of branches from the mesenteric vessels, the SMA was taped, and the circumferential dissection around the SMA was performed to detach the pancreatic neck from the SMA completely. Finally, the dissection between the SMV and the tumor was performed under vascular control to remove the specimen.

The anterior SMA-first approach can be optional in patients with PC undergoing RPD. This unique approach allows for the circumferential dissection around the SMA during RPD.

Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy is an increasingly accepted alternative for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).1 However, the ability to perform a meticulous robotic-assisted superior mesenteric artery (SMA) dissection to obtain a margin-negative resection remains unknown.2 PDAC within the head of the pancreas (HOP) that involves the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and portal vein (PV) requires total venous control (TVC) and a 'vein-to-the-right' (or anterior artery-first) approach to SMA dissection to minimize venous congestion and operative blood loss.3-5 Here, we demonstrate a robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with TVC and a 'vein-to-the-right' approach.

A 70-year-old woman with cT2N0M0 HOP PDAC with lateral SMV involvement and right gastroepiploic vein occlusion underwent robotic pancreatoduodenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. After transecting the pancreas, we achieved TVC by dividing the small venous tributaries and encircling the SMV, splenic vein, and PV. We then proceeded with a 'vein-to-the-right' approach. The inferior pancreatoduodenal arteries were divided to minimize HOP inflow and decrease specimen bleeding. Once the specimen was dissected off the periadventitial plane of the distal SMA, the SMV dissection was carefully performed using a partial side-wall vein resection using a vascular stapler.

Total operative time was 7.5 h and estimated blood loss was 25 mL. The patient recovered well postoperatively and was discharged on postoperative day 3. Final pathology exhibited a 2.4 cm, moderately to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with negative margins (ypT2N1, 2/38 lymph nodes positive).

For tumors with lateral vein involvement, robotic pancreatoduodenectomy can be safely performed via TVC and a 'vein-to-the-right' approach.

In PDAC patients, ctDNA detection's prognostic significance needs validation especially in resected patients. This study investigated ctDNA kinetics in portal and peripheral blood before and after resection, and whether tissue mobilization during surgery influences ctDNA detection. In this single-center prospective cohort, portal and peripheral blood were drawn during pancreaticoduodenectomy before and after tissue mobilization, during 12 postoperative months and were associated with overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and CA19-9 (secondary endpoints). Tumor mutations were identified using next-generation-sequencing and ctDNA detected by digital droplet PCR. From 2018 to 2022, 34 patients were included. The 2-year RFS and OS were 47.6%(95%CI[29.5; 63.6]) and 65.7%(95%CI[46.5; 79.4]) respectively. Intraoperatively, ctDNA detection in portal or peripheral blood was associated with worse RFS (HR[95%CI]3.26[1.26; 8.45],p = 0.010) and OS (HR[95%CI]5.46[1.65;18.01],p = 0.002). Portal vein sampling did not improve ctDNA detection. CtDNA levels were increased by 2.5-fold (p = 0.031) in peripheral blood after tissue mobilization but not significantly linked to RFS or OS. Detecting ctDNA intraoperatively was correlated with poorer RFS (HR [95% CI] 3.26 [1.26;8.45], p = 0.010) and 0S (HR [95% CI] 5.46 [1.65;18.01], p = 0.002). Portal vein sampling did not improve ctDNA detection. Tissue mobilization increases ctDNA levels. Intraoperative detection of ctDNA is associated with a worse prognosis.

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) is a high-risk surgical procedure. Delayed division of the pancreatic parenchyma (DDPP) was reported as a novel technique in HPD for reducing postoperative pancreatic fistula. However, it is often difficult to dissect the pancreatic head nerve plexus while leaving the pancreatic parenchyma intact, particularly in patients with a bulky tumor with vascular invasion. Of the various reported approaches to the superior mesenteric artery, the right lateral approach can provide a useful surgical field to conduct DDPP in HPD.

A 78-year-old man visited a local clinic with itching and jaundice. Laboratory tests revealed elevated hepatobiliary enzyme, total bilirubin, and tumor markers. Enhanced computed tomography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and intraductal ultrasonography of the bile duct were performed, and he was diagnosed with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with invasion to the right hepatic artery (40 × 15 mm, Bismuth IIIa, cT3N0M0 cStage III). After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, he underwent left hepatectomy with caudate lobectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, and combined resection of right hepatic artery using DDPP with a right lateral approach to the superior mesenteric artery. The pathological diagnosis was perihilar cholangiocarcinoma ypT3N1M0 ypStage IIIC, R0 resection. He was discharged on postoperative day 57 in good health and has been doing well for 6 months since the surgery.

We present an effective application of the right lateral approach to the superior mesenteric artery in DDPP during HPD. This procedure can provide a clear surgical field to easily divide the pancreatic head nerve plexus before transection of the pancreatic parenchyma.

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for limited resections for pancreatic uncinate lesions is not widely performed but can adequately treat benign or low-grade malignant lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of MIS-limited pancreatic resections for patients with suspected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs).

This was a retrospective study of six consecutive patients who underwent MIS for PNET within a single institution between 2017 and 2022.

Six patients underwent limited pancreas-preserving MIS of the uncinate process (uncinectomy or enucleation), of which two were performed through the robotic approach and four through laparoscopic approach. The median operation time was 212.5 (175-338.75) min, and the median blood loss was 50 (50-112.5) ml. The median post-operative hospital length of stay was 5.5 (3.75-11.5) days. Two patients (33.3%) had major post-operative morbidities (Clavien-Dindo ≥Grade 3). There were no open conversions or post-operative mortalities. Five patients had histologically proven Grade 1 neuroendocrine tumours. One was T2 and four were T1.

This study suggests that limited MIS resections of pancreatic uncinate PNETs are a feasible procedure with good patient outcomes. It offers a safe alternative to radical surgical resections like pancreatoduodenectomies in selected patients with low-grade malignant or benign tumours.

Although the dorsal pancreatic artery (DPA) is an important artery that supplies the pancreas, its morphology has not been sufficiently studied. We investigated the morphology of the DPA and the progression of pancreatic cancer along this vessel.

Overall, 142 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent surgical resection at Kanazawa University Hospital between 2004 and 2015 were enrolled. We examined the morphology of the DPA using preoperative computed tomography and cancer progression along the DPA using resected specimens. We investigated the anatomical structures surrounding the DPA through cadaveric examination.

The analysis of computed tomography images revealed the presence of the DPA in 141 patients. In typical cases, the DPA divides into a head and a body branch. Histopathological examination revealed cancer progression along the DPA in 32 patients. Cancer progression along the DPA was identified as a factor associated with a poor prognosis in pancreatic head or body cancer. Cadaveric examination showed the presence of abundant nerve and lymphatic tissues along the DPA.

It is important to remove the soft tissue surrounding the DPA during surgery for pancreatic head or body cancer because it may serve as an important route for cancer progression.

We describe details and outcomes of a novel technique for optimizing the surgical field during robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) for distal pancreatic lesions, which has become common with potential advantages over laparoscopic surgery.

For suprapancreatic lymph node dissection and splenic artery ligation, we used the basic center position with a scope through the midline port. During manipulation of the perisplenic area, the left position was used by moving the scope to the left medial side. The left lateral position is optionally used by moving the scope to the left lateral port when scope access to the perisplenic area is difficult. In addition, early splenic artery clipping and short gastric artery dissection for inflow block were performed to minimize bleeding around the spleen. We evaluated retrospectively the surgical outcomes of our method using a scoring system that allocated one point for blood inflow control and one point for optimizing the surgical view in the left position.

We analyzed 34 patients who underwent RDP or R-radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS). The left position was applied in 14 patients, and the left lateral position was applied in 6. Based on the scoring system, only the 0-point group (n = 8) had four bleeding cases (50%) with splenic injury or blood pooling; the other 1-point or 2-point groups (n = 13, respectively) had no bleeding cases (p = 0.0046).

Optimization of the surgical field using scope transition and inflow control ensured safe dissection during RDP.

Notable improvements in pancreatic cancer surgery have been due to utilization of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA)-first approach1 and triangle operation (clearance of triangle tissue between origin of SMA and celiac artery).2 The SMA-first approach was originally defined to assess resectability before taking the irreversible surgical steps. However, in the present era, resectability is judged by the preoperative radiology, and the benefit of the SMA-first approach is by improving the R0 resection rate and reducing blood loss. The basic principle is to identify the SMA at its origin and in the distal part, to guide the plane of uncinate dissection. This video demonstrates the combination of the posterior and right medial SMA-first approach along with triangle clearance during robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD).

The technique consisted of early dissection of SMA from the posterior aspect, by performing a Kocher maneuver using the 'posterior SMA-first approach'. The origin of the celiac artery, along with the SMA, was defined early in the surgery. During uncinate process dissection, the 'right/medial uncinate approach' was used to approach the SMA. 'Level 3 systematic mesopancreatic dissection' was performed along the SMA,3 culminating in the 'triangle operation'.2 RESULTS: The procedure was performed within 600 min, with a blood loss of 150 mL and no intraoperative or postoperative complications. The final histopathology report showed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (pT2, pN2), with all resection margins free.

The standardized technique of the SMA-first approach and triangle clearance during RPD is demonstrated in the video. Prospective studies should further evaluate the benefits of this procedure.

SMA-first approach in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) has been widely applied in open surgery as well as laparoscopy. Finding the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), inferior pancreatoduodenal artery (IPDA), first jejunal artery (J1A) has become a great challenge in laparoscopic PD (LPD). Meanwhile, exposing the midde colic artery (MCA) might be a feasible approach to determine SMA, IPDA, and J1A. Our study aims to find the anatomical correlation between MCA and SMA, IPDA, J1A, especially in SMA-first approach LPD from the left.

Uncontrolled clinical trial with 33 patients undergoing LPD had preoperative contrast abdominal CT scan to analyze the anatomical relevance between MCA and SMA, J1A, IPDA. The operation was performed starting with exposing MCA in advance to find SMA, J1A and IPDA. The data was analyzed by SPSS 25.0.

90.9% of MCA started at 12-3 o'clock from SMA, the mean distance from the SMA root to the MCA and J1A was 56.4 mm and 37.4 mm, respectively. The distance between SMA and J1A was 19 mm. 72.7% J1A started at 9-12 o'clock, 69.7% J1A and IPDA had a common trunk. 78.8% IPDA started at 3-6 o'clock. 100% of the cases had J1A controlled intraoperatively, 81.8% for IPDA when approached from the left, 3% had MCA injury. The mean time to approach from the left was 98 min, median blood loss was 100 ml.

Exposing MCA first helps determine SMA, J1A and IPDA safely, efficiently and faciliates SMA-first approach LPD from the left and complete dissection of the mesopancreas and lymph nodes.

In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), invasion of connective tissues surrounding major arteries is a crucial prognostic factor after radical resection. However, why the connective tissues invasion is associated with poor prognosis is not well understood.

From 2018 to 2020, 25 patients receiving radical surgery for PDAC in our institute were enrolled. HyperEye Medical System (HEMS) was used to examine lymphatic flow from the connective tissues surrounding SMA and SpA and which lymph nodes ICG accumulated in was examined.

HEMS imaging revealed ICG was transported down to the paraaortic area of the abdominal aorta along SMA. In pancreatic head cancer, 9 paraaortic lymph nodes among 14 (64.3%) were ICG positive, higher positivity than LN#15 (25.0%) or LN#18 (50.0%), indicating lymphatic flow around the SMA was leading directly to the paraaortic lymph nodes. Similarly, in pancreatic body and tail cancer, the percentage of ICG-positive LN #16a2 was very high, as was that of #8a, although that of #7 was only 42.9%.

Our preliminary result indicated that the lymphatic flow along the connective tissues surrounding major arteries could be helpful in understanding metastasis and improving prognosis in BR-A pancreatic cancer.

The middle colic artery usually arises from the superior mesenteric artery, but in rare cases it may arise from the coeliac trunk or its branches. The aim of this study was to investigate variant origins of the middle colic artery on computed tomography and anatomical dissection. Variant middle colic arteries were identified on computed tomography as part of an ongoing study investigating anatomical variations of vessels of the upper abdomen. Three-dimensional reconstructions were made to demonstrate the variant findings. Cadaveric dissections were performed as part of a routine dissection course. We report five cases of rare variant origins of the middle colic artery arising from the coeliac axis. Among these sites of origin were the coeliac trunk, the gastrosplenic trunk, the splenic artery, and the common hepatic artery. Four cases were identified on multi-detector computed tomography and one in a cadaver. In all cases, the vessels passed posterior to the body of the pancreas before entering the transverse mesocolon. Knowledge of middle colic artery variations is important to prevent inadvertent injury in digestive surgery, especially in the hepatopancreatic area. Variant origins of the middle colic artery are rare, and their knowledge is crucial to prevent unnecessary iatrogenic injury during abdominal surgery.

Although venous drainage of the jejunal loop may be maintained after sacrifice of jejunal vein tributaries during pancreatoduodenectomy, risk of severe jejunal mesenteric congestion following division of these tributaries can be difficult to predict. This study considered how best to predict safety of jejunal vein tributary dissection.

Preoperative imaging findings and results of intraoperative clamp tests of jejunal vein tributaries during pancreatoduodenectomy were analyzed in 121 patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease to determine whether this information adequately predicted safety of resecting superior mesenteric vein branches.

Jejunal vein tributaries caudal to the inferior border of the pancreatic uncinate process tended to be fewer when tributaries cranial to this landmark were more numerous. Tributaries cranial to the border drained a relatively wide expanse of jejunal artery territory in the jejunal mesentery. The territory of jejunal tributaries cranial to the inferior border of the pancreas did not vary according to course of the first jejunal vein branch relative to the superior mesenteric artery. One patient among 30 (3%) who underwent intraoperative clamp tests of tributaries cranial to the border showed severe congestion in relation to a venous tributary coursing ventrally to the superior mesenteric artery.

Jejunal venous tributaries drained an extensive portion of jejunal arterial territory, but tributaries located cranially to the inferior border of the pancreas could be sacrificed without congestion in nearly all patients. Intraoperative clamp testing of these tributaries can identify patients whose jejunal veins must be preserved to avoid congestion.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the only radical treatment for periampullary malignancies. Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) first approach combined with total meso-pancreas (MP) excision was conducted to improve the oncological results. There has not been any previous research of a technique that combines the SMA first approach and total MP excision with a detailed description of the MP macroscopical shape.

We prospectively assessed 77 patients with periampullary malignancies between October 2020 and March 2022 (18 months). All patients had undergone PD with SMA first approach combined total MP excision. The perioperative indications, clinical data, intra-operative index, R0 resection rate of postoperative pathological specimens (especially mesopancreatic margin), postoperative complications, and follow-up results were evaluated.

The median operative time was 289.6 min (178-540 min), the median intraoperative blood loss was 209 mL (30-1,600 mL). Microscopically, there were 19 (24.7%) cases with metastatic MP, and five cases (6.5%) with R1-resection of the MP. The number of lymph nodes (LNs) harvested and metastatic LNs were 27.2 (maximum was 74) and 1.8 (maximum was 16), respectively. Some (46.8%) patients had pancreatic fistula, but mostly in grade A, with 7 patients (9.1%) who required re-operations. Some 18.2% of cases developed postoperative refractory diarrhea. The rate of in-hospital mortality was 1.3%.

The PD with SMA first approach combined TMpE for periampullary malignancies was effective in achieving superior oncological statistics (rate of MP R0-resection and number of total resected LNs) with non-inferior short-term outcomes. It is necessary to evaluate survival outcomes with long-term follow-up.

Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is technically demanding, and 20-50 cases are required to surpass the learning curve. This study aimed to show our experience of 76 cases from the introduction of RPD and report the changes in surgical results owing to the accumulation of cases and optimization of surgical techniques.

A total of 76 patients who underwent RPD between November 2009 and May 2023 at the Fujita Health University Hospital were divided into three groups: competency (n = 23, Nov 2009-Mar 2020), proficiency (n = 31, Apr 2020-Jun 2022), and mastery (n = 22, Jul 2022-May 2023) phases. In the mastery phase, for the education of new surgeons and maintenance of surgical quality, optimization of the procedure, including hanging maneuver with or without stapling transection of the retropancreatic tissue was implemented. The surgical outcomes were compared between the groups.

The mean operation time decreased over time despite of the participation of newly started operators in mastery phase [competency: 921.5 min (IQR 775-996 min) vs. proficiency: 802.8 min (IQR 715-887 min) vs. mastery: 609.2 min (IQR 514-699 min), p < 0.001]. Additionally, Clavien-Dindo ≥ grade IIIa complications decreased from 52.2% in competency phase to 35.5% and 9.1% in proficiency and mastery phases, respectively (p = 0.005).

Operation time and major complications decreased along the learning curve from the introduction of RPD. In addition, optimization of the procedure, including hanging maneuver of the retropancreatic tissue seemed to be effective in reducing operation time and educating new RPD surgeons.

There is no evidence supporting the feasibility of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

The clinical data of consecutive patients with borderline resectable PDAC who received NACT and underwent either LPD or OPD between January 2020 and December 2022 at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center was prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed.

The analysis included 57 patients in the OPD group and 20 in the LPD group. Following NACT, the LPD group exhibited a higher median CA19-9 decrease rate compared to the OPD group (85.3% vs. 66.9%, P = 0.042). Furthermore, 3 anatomically borderline PDACs in the LPD group and 5 in the OPD group were downstaged into resectable status (30.0% vs. 12.3%, P = 0.069). According to RECIST criteria, 51 (66.2%) patients in the entire cohort were evaluated as having stable disease. The median operation time for the LPD group was longer than the OPD group (419 vs. 325 min, P < 0.001), while the venous resection rate was 35.0% vs. 43.9%, respectively (P = 0.489). There was no difference in the number of retrieved lymph nodes, with a median number of 18.5 in the LPD group and 22 in the OPD group, and the R1 margin rate (15.0% vs. 12.3%) was also comparable. The incidence of Clavien-Dindo complications (35.0% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.018) was lower in the LPD group compared to the OPD group. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that a tumor diameter > 3 cm before NACT (HR 2.185) and poor tumor differentiation (HR 1.805) were independent risk factors for recurrence-free survival, and a decrease rate of CA19-9 > 70% (OR 0.309) was a protective factor for early tumor recurrence and overall survival.

LPD for PDAC following NACT is feasible and oncologically equivalent to OPD. Effective control of CA19-9 levels is beneficial in reducing early tumor recurrence and improving overall survival.

A retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma is an exceptionally rare surgical entity, even more so in pancreaticoduodenal tumors. These well-differentiated neuroepithelial tumors originate in the neural crest, emerge in the sympathetic nervous system, and consist of ganglion cells and stromal Schwann cells. Generally, these tumors, despite being mostly benign, may be associated with venous or arterial vascular involvement. The symptomatology presented will depend on the mass effect due to tumor growth, and surgical excision is the only therapeutic option offered today to these patients. However, encapsulation of the main vessels represents a great surgical complexity. Various surgical approaches have been employed throughout history; however, the current preferred method is an open midline laparotomy, involving an extensive Kocher maneuver and an artery-first approach, aiming for an R0 resection of the tumor with total vascular preservation to the greatest extent possible. We present a case of an R2 resection involving a 95 mm x 85 mm retroperitoneal peripancreatic ganglioneuroma with double vascular involvement (celiac trunk and superior mesenteric artery). The procedure utilized an artery-first approach with total vascular preservation in a 17-year-old woman who had long-standing gastrointestinal symptoms due to the mass effect.

Pancreatic resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most complex procedures in abdominal surgery due to the technical and oncological challenges given by its local aggressive growth. The improvement of new multidrug chemotherapy regimens and surgical techniques has increased the caseload of "borderline resectable" (BR) or even "locally advanced" (LA) PDAC candidates for surgical resection. As a result, the increased heterogeneity of surgical scenarios has made it essential to utilize a tailored surgical strategy for each individual case. Notably, the strategy employed to approach and assess the peripancreatic vessels should be weighted according to tumor's location and the site of suspected vascular infiltration. The aim of this paper is to describe the open surgical approach for "BR" or "LA" PDAC used at our Institution and summarizes a "step-up approach" to manage vascular infiltration.

In pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), the approach to superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is a critical process that supports adequate surgical margins and radicality for pancreatic tumors. In most of the reports on laparoscopic PD, the right-sided approach in which the jejunum is pulled out to the right side for peri-SMA dissection is used, since the left side of the SMA is difficult to dissect, and the only way to do this is to dissect the vein first.

We devised a method to simplify and safely perform peri-SMA dissection by reversing the process, starting from the left side of the SMA. The first step involves the mobilization of the pancreatic head, which allows for rotation around the SMA. The second step involves the dissection of the left side of the SMA and transection of the jejunum. The key point is to change the incision line between the anterior and posterior mesojejunum. The third process includes the inferior pancreatoduodenal artery (IPDA) and first jejunal artery (J1A) dissection, which can be easily performed from the left side because the SMA rotates by simply continuing the dissection along the previously exposed SMA, and the IPDA/J1A are safely dissected at the root because they are drawn to the left side. The remaining processes are performed on the right side.

This method was performed in 16 cases, and in most cases IPDA/J1A were divided from the left side.

The technique for SMA dissection from the left posterior side was described with illustrations and video. Our method allows safe oncologic dissection around SMA avoiding anatomical misorientation during laparoscopic PD.

Various approaches have been reported for the resection of the nervous and lymphatic tissues around the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic cancer. We developed a new procedure for circumferential lymph node dissection around the SMA to minimize local recurrence.

We included 24 patients who underwent PD with circumferential lymph node dissection around the SMA (circumferential dissection) and 94 patients who underwent classical mesopancreatic dissection (classical dissection) between 2019 and 2021. The technical details of this new method are described in the figures and videos, and the clinical characteristics and outcomes of this technique were compared with those of classical dissection.

The median follow-up durations in the circumferential and classical dissection groups were 39 and 36 months, respectively. The patients' characteristics, including tumor resectability, preoperative and adjuvant chemotherapy rates, postoperative complication rates, and tumor stage, were similar between the two groups. No differences were observed in recurrence-free survival and overall survival between the two groups; however, the classical dissection group tended to have more local recurrences than the circumferential dissection group (8.3% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.168). Although no case of nodular-type recurrence after circumferential dissection was observed, 61.1% of local recurrences after classical dissection were of the nodular-type, and 36.4% were located on the left side of the SMA.

Performing circumferential lymph node dissection around the SMA during PD can be conducted safely with minimal risks of local recurrence and may enhance the completeness of local resection.

Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) are at the heart of "evidence-based" medicine. Conducting well-designed RCTs for surgical procedures is often challenged by inadequate recruitment accrual, blinding, or standardization of the surgical procedure, as well as lack of funding and evolution of the treatment strategy during the many years over which such trials are conducted. In addition, most clinical trials are performed in academic high-volume centers with highly selected patients, which may not necessarily reflect a "real-world" practice setting. Large databases provide easy and inexpensive access to data on a large and diverse patient population at a variety of treatment centers. Furthermore, large database studies provide the opportunity to answer questions that would be impossible or very arduous to answer using RCTs, including questions regarding health policy efficacy, trends in surgical practice, access to health care, the impact of hospital volume, and adherence to practice guidelines, as well as research questions regarding rare disease, infrequent surgical outcomes, and specific subpopulations. Prospective data registries may also allow for quality benchmarking and auditing. There are several high-quality RCTs providing evidence to support current practices in hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) oncology. Evidence from big data bridges the gap in several instances where RCTs are lacking. In this article, we review the evidence from RCTs and big data in HPB oncology identify the existing lacunae, and discuss the future directions of research in HPB oncology.

Despite the substantial decrease in mortality rates following a pancreaticoduodenectomy to less than 5%, morbidity rates remain significant, reaching even 73%. Postoperative pancreatic fistula is one of the most frequent major complications and is significantly associated with other complications, including patient death. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the ideal type of pancreatic anastomosis, as the question of the choice between a pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy is still open. Furthermore, worldwide implementation of an ideal pancreatic fistula risk prediction score is missing. Our study found several significant predictive factors for the postoperative occurrence of fistulas, such as the soft consistency of the pancreas, non-dilated Wirsung duct, important intraoperative blood loss, other perioperative complications, preoperative patient hypoalbuminemia, and patient weight loss. Our study also revealed that for patients who exhibit fistula risk factors, pancreaticogastrostomy demonstrates a significantly lower pancreatic fistula rate than pancreaticojejunostomy. The occurrence of pancreatic fistulas has been significantly associated with the development of other postoperative major complications, and patient death. As the current pancreatic fistula risk scores proposed by various authors have not been consensually validated, we propose a simple, easy-to-use, and sensitive score for the risk prediction of postoperative pancreatic fistula occurrence based on important predictors from statistical analyses that have also been found to be significant by most of the reported studies. The new pancreatic fistula risk score proposed by us could be extremely useful for improved therapeutic management of cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy patients.

The dorsal pancreatic artery (DPA) is a pancreatic branch with various anatomical variations. Previous studies mostly focused on the origin of the DPA, and its pathways and branching patterns have rarely been examined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the branching patterns and pathways of the DPA.

This study included 110 patients who underwent computed tomography scans. We examined the pathways and branching patterns of the DPA.

The DPA was identified in 101 patients (92%), and originated from the splenic artery in 30 patients (31%), the common hepatic artery in 17 patients (17%), the celiac trunk in 10 patients (10%), the superior mesenteric artery in 27 patients (27%), the replaced right hepatic artery in 7 patients (7%), the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery in 5 patients (5%), and other arteries in 3 patients (3%). Four distinct types of branches were identified as follows: the superior branch (32%), the inferior branch (86%), the right branch (80%), and the accessory middle colic artery (12%). Additionally, the arcs of Buhler and Riolan were observed in two patients each and their anastomotic vessels followed almost the same pathway as the DPA.

A number of variations of the DPA were observed with regard to its origin and branching pattern; however, the DPA and its branches always ran along the same pathway, as summarized in Fig. 4. The anatomical information gained from this study may contribute to performing safe pancreatic resections.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic cancer carries a high risk of massive intraoperative blood loss. The artery first approach (AFA) prevents blood loss during PD, but the optimal approach is unclear. The first jejunal vein (FJV) often comprises multiple veins and broadly supports venous drainage of the proximal jejunum. Its ligation carries a risk of proximal jejunum congestion. Here we investigated the anatomical characteristics of PD-associated vessels and AFA approach selection based on FJV anatomy.

This study included 148 Japanese living donors for liver transplantation. We reviewed their computed tomography images and assessed the anatomical pattern of PD-associated vessels in terms of FJV anatomy.

The FJV traveled posterior to the superior mesenteric artery in 128 patients (86.5%, dorsal group) and anterior in 20 (13.5%, ventral group). The predominant draining vein of the inferior pancreaticoduodenal vein was the superior mesenteric vein in the ventral group (87.5%) and the FJV in the dorsal group (97.9%). Compared with the dorsal group, the ventral group had a significantly greater percentage with the superior mesenteric vein ventral to the superior mesenteric artery (30.0% versus 10.9%) and a significantly larger posterior superior pancreaticoduodenal vein diameter (3.2 ± 0.9 versus 2.7 ± 0.6 mm, p = 0.0029). These results were validated in patients with pancreatic head cancer.

The anatomical characteristics of PD-associated vessels differed significantly between groups defined by FJV anatomy. Understanding the venous anatomy, especially the FJV, could support selection of the best approach in AFA for PD.

Tumors with involvement of common hepatic and gastroduodenal arteries (CHA and GDA) or GDA and the proper hepatic artery (PHA) are traditionally considered nonresectable. We have devised a new procedure that includes pancreaticoduodenectomy with preoperative hepatic artery embolization (PD-HAE) to facilitate an R0 resection of tumors involving the hepatic arteries without vascular anastomoses and complete sacrifice of normal hepatic arterial blood supply.

To allow resection of the hepatic arteries, preoperative embolization of the PHA was performed to induce an increased collateral arterial blood flow from the periphery of the liver, far from the hepatic hilum 10-14 days prior to the operation. Between May 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019, eight patients with ductal adenocarcinoma were operated with the PD-HAE procedure.

The embolizations were uneventful apart from a transient marginal elevation of alanine aminotransferase in three patients. All patients had N disease with perineural invasion of tumor cells around the adventitia of the artery and severe perivascular inflammation. An R0 resection (> 1.0 mm to all resection margins) was obtained in six patients (75%). Mean hospital stay was 12 days. Median survival was 23 months (95% CI: 19.5-26.5 months). Six patients (75%) are still alive 11 to 36 months after the operation. There was perioperative fatality, and morbidity was comparable to standard pancreaticoduodenectomy.

PD-HAE is a safe procedure and may provide the opportunity for curative resection in otherwise unresectable patients. However, larger studies are needed to evaluate this procedure.

To evaluate the outcomes of pancreatic cancer [pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)] surgery with concomitant portal vein resection (PVR), focusing on the PVR type according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).

Surgery offers the only chance for cure in PDAC. PVR is often performed for borderline or locally advanced tumors.

Consecutive patients with PDAC operated between January 2006 and January 2018 were included. Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes were analyzed and tested for survival prediction.

Of 2265 PDAC resections, 1571 (69.4%) were standard resections and 694 (30.6%) were resections with PVR, including 149 (21.5%) tangential resections with venorrhaphy (ISGPS type 1), 21 (3.0%) resections with patch reconstruction (type 2), 491 (70.7%) end-to-end anastomoses (type 3), and 33 (4.8%) resections with graft interposition (type 4). The 90-day mortality rate was 2.6% after standard resection and 6.3% after resection with PVR ( P <0.0001). Postoperative portal vein thrombosis and pancreas-specific surgical complications most frequently occurred after PVR with graft interposition (21.2% and 48.5%, respectively). In multivariable analysis, age 70 years and above, ASA stages 3/4, increased preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9, neoadjuvant treatment, total pancreatectomy, PVR, higher UICC stage, and R+ resections were significant negative prognostic factors for overall survival. Radical R0 (>1 mm) resection resulted in 23.3 months of median survival.

This is the largest single-center, comparative cohort study of PVR in PDAC surgery, showing that postoperative morbidity correlates with the reconstruction type. When radical resection is achieved, thrombosis risk is outweighed by beneficial overall survival times of nearly 2 years.

Pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth most frequent cause of cancer-related death in the Western world, and its incidence is rising. In patients that undergo curative resection, local recurrence (LR) is frequent. A recently described surgical technique of extended pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) termed the TRIANGLE operation has been proposed as a promising approach to reduce LR and improve disease-free survival in PDAC patients.

The TRIANGLE trial is a multicentre confirmatory randomised controlled superiority trial with two parallel study groups. A total of 270 patients with suspected or histologically confirmed pancreatic head cancer scheduled for PD will be included in the trial and randomly assigned to the intervention group (extended PD defined as Inoue level 3 dissection along the superior mesenteric and celiac artery as well as removal of all soft tissue in the so-called triangle between the celiac artery, the SMA and the mesenterico-portal axis) or the control group (conventional PD with lymphadenectomy and removal of soft tissue according to current guidelines). The primary endpoint of the trial will be the disease-free survival of patients. Other perioperative outcomes as well as oncological parameters and patient-reported outcomes will be analysed as secondary outcomes.

Despite multimodal treatment, LR remains high and disease-free survival is limited following PD for PDAC. The TRIANGLE operation could address these shortcomings of conventional PD as indicated in several retrospective studies. However, this technique could be associated with more adverse events for patients including intractable diarrhoea. The TRIANGLE trial will close the evidence gap as well as offer a risk-benefit assessment of this more radical approach to PD.

German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00030576 (UTN U1111-1243-4412) 19th December 2022.

Pancreas-sparing distal duodenectomy (PSDD) is a favorable option for distal duodenal neoplasms, and its procedure, including the extent of lymphadenectomy, should be modified according to the malignancy of the tumor. However, there are no coherent reports on the details of this procedure or long-term outcomes after each resection.

This study included 24 patients who underwent PSDD at our institution between January 2009 and October 2020. Patients were divided into two groups according to the tumor progression: nine with (Lv-II) and fifteen without (Lv-I) mesopancreas dissection. Postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Two groups had similar operation times, blood loss, hospital stay, and the rate of delayed gastric emptying (DGE): 40% versus 44%. There were no Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ III complications in the Lv-II group. The Lv-II group had a larger number of examined lymph nodes (median: 29), and three (33%) patients had lymph node metastasis. No local recurrence was observed, although two patients in the Lv-II group had liver metastasis. The 5-year overall survival rates of the Lv-I and Lv-II groups were 100% and 78%, respectively. None of the patients had an impaired nutrition status after one year of surgery, and no rehospitalization was observed in either group.

Although PSDD with or without mesopancreas dissection entailed a high risk of DGE, this procedure showed favorable long-term outcomes and may be an alternative to pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with distal duodenal neoplasms.